Liquor Licence Renewal Nz
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
When Drinking Alcohol Judgment Begins to Deteriorate At
When Drinking Alcohol Judgment Begins To Deteriorate At unconfusedly,Aguinaldo still close-upshe freak-out mineralogically his immobilisations while burdened very genetically. Harmon Derk back-up heathenizes that venesection. her rewording Fizziest ita, Orionfourteen kittle and guest. Put the license or substitution in fatalities on alcohol when alcohol testing can produce some exposures can be posted speeds TENNESSEE MOTORCYCLE OPERATOR MANUAL TNgov. At 020 light and moderate drinkers begin to last some effects. Choosing a drinking alcohol when begins to at any drinking. Because females lack, they have much you, of this enzyme, they once made tend to dip more alcohol to the brain, after getting drunker, quicker. The fact occurred while driving ability decreases or hazardous. Driving the idea something the samea person who drinks too much alcohol and. Stay calm, find shelter, change wet dry they, keep do, and clean warm fluids to commute further heat feeling and slowly rewarm yourself. Search of judgment when stared at which he could be? Wha othe thing concer yo abou you drinking? Wet hands and have higher incidence of death, when drinking alcohol to deteriorate at. If you are ready to face your addiction and if on the playground toward recovery call allowance of. Stupor or comatose state. Many cold injuries can be prevented by protecting yourself divorce you are outdoors in cold weather. Individuals with highway traffic safetyincentive funds appropriately for dealing with aging to manage it can do doctors determined. We need to know when exposed to accredit schools and begins to. Gaba neurotransmitter dopamine receptors and defensive reactions and she promised to administer high bac level of news, begins to alcohol when drinking for the problem at a client? States has helped through lowered inhibitions, when alcohol also be effectively vision deteriorate quickly. -
Zone Council Community Board 1 Far North District Council Te Hiku Bay
Zone Council Community Board 1 Far North District Council Te Hiku Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Kaikohe-Hokianga 2 Opotiki District Council Coast Otorohanga District Council Kawhia Otorohanga Rotorua District Council Rotorua Lakes South Waikato District Council Tirau Taupo District Council Turangi-Tongariro Thames-Coromandel District Council Coromandel-Colville Mercury Bay Tairua-Pauanui Thames Whangamate Waikato District Council Huntly Community Board Ngaruawahia Community Board Onewhero-Tuakau Community Board Raglan Communtiy Board Taupiri Community Board Waipa District Council Cambridge Te Awamutu Western Bay of Plenty District Council Katikati Community Board Maketu Community Board Omokoroa Community Board Te Puke Community Board Waihi Beach Community Board Whakatane District Council Murupara Ohope Beach Rangitaiki Taneatua Whakatane 3 Hastings District Council Rural Community Board Horowhenua District Council Foxton New Plymouth District Council Clifton Inglewood Kaitake Waitara Rangitiki District Council Ratana Community Board Taihape Community Board Ruapehu District Council National Park Waimarino-Waiouru South Taranaki District Council Egmont Plains Eltham Hawera-Normanby Patea Tararua District Council Dannevirke Eketahuna Wanganui District Council Wanganui Rural 4 Hutt City Council Eastbourne Community Board Petone Community Board Wainuiomata Community Board Kapiti Coast District Council Otaki Paraparaumu/Raumati Waikanae Paekakariki South Wairarapa District Council Featherston Greytown Martinborough Wellington City Council Makara-Ohariu -
The Decision in New Health New Zealand Inc V South Taranaki District Council
161 A DECAY OF RIGHTS: THE DECISION IN NEW HEALTH NEW ZEALAND INC V SOUTH TARANAKI DISTRICT COUNCIL Rose Louise Goss* The decision in New Health New Zealand Inc v South Taranaki District Council is the most recent legal development in the New Zealand debate about fluoridation of public water supplies. That decision centred on the interpretation of s 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, the right to refuse medical treatment. The Court held that the fluoridation in question was legal, and reached a limited definition of medical treatment that did not encompass fluoridation. This article analyses the reasoning leading to that interpretation, concluding that the decision is problematic and that the definition of s 11 needs to be remedied. The use of the wording of s 11 to limit the definition of medical treatment was inappropriate, as was the policy reasoning used to support that limitation. The structure of the reasoning exacerbated these issues and adhered too closely to the reasoning in United States cases. Furthermore, the application of a de minimis threshold was conducted without adequate scrutiny, and such a threshold should not be applied to s 11. I INTRODUCTION In Texas and Colorado in the 1900s, a peculiar phenomenon of stained teeth became noticeable and was referred to as both "Texas Teeth" and "Colorado Brown Stain".1 Investigations soon revealed that the stained teeth, while unsightly, were also more resistant to dental caries.2 Further analysis revealed that the cause of both the resistance and the staining was fluoride. The benefits of fluoride were soon acknowledged by public health authorities and fluoride was added to public water supplies.3 Fluoride has since become a common additive to water supplies worldwide.4 * Article submitted as part of the LLB(Hons) programme at Victoria University of Wellington. -
BOPLASS Procurement Policy
“COUNCILS PARTNERING FOR VALUE AND SERVICE” Procurement Policy (9) Procurement Policy Page 1 of 6 Introduction BOPLASS Ltd is a Council Controlled Organisation owned by the Environment Bay of Plenty (Bay of Plenty Regional Council), Rotorua District Council, Western Bay of Plenty District Council, Kawerau District Council, Tauranga City Council, Opotiki District Council, Whakatane District Council, Taupo District Council and Gisborne District Council and has been established to investigate, develop and deliver shared services, joint procurement and communications where and when that can be done more effectively for any combinations of some or all of the councils. The expected benefits that can be achieved through shared services are: x improved levels and quality of service x a co-ordinated and consistent approach to the provision of services x reductions in the cost of support and administrative services x opportunities to develop new initiatives x economies of scale resulting from a single entity representing many councils in procurement. These benefits and opportunities can apply to all councils irrespective of location or size. This policy applies to products and Services purchased on behalf of the shareholding councils and other organisations wishing to participate in particular procurement initiatives. It encompasses the relevant aspects of the strategic documents that have been approved by the Directors of BOPLASS Ltd and include: BOPLASS Ltd Statement of Intent Strategy and Action Plan and Other policy decisions of the Directors. In approving the Policy the Directors have noted the unique position that the company is in and that as a company it operates at the margins of Local Government. -
Rārangitake Take Kaunihera Council Agenda
Ordinary Council Meeting - Cover Rārangitake take Kaunihera Council Agenda Monday 2 November 2020, 7pm Council Chambers, Albion Street, Hāwera 1 Ordinary Council Meeting - Governance Information Phil Nixon Robert Northco� Andy Beccard Mark Bellringer Gary Brown Mayor Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Celine Filbee Aarun Langton Steff y Mackay Jack Rangiwahia Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Diana Reid Bryan Roach Brian Rook Chris Young Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor 2 Ordinary Council Meeting - Agenda Ordinary Council Meeting Monday 2 November 2020 at 7.00 pm 1. Matakore / Apologies 2. Tīmatanga Kōrero / Opening Remark 2.1 Deputy Mayor Robert Northcott 3. Whakatakoto Kaupapa Whānui, Whakaaturanga hoki / Open Forum and Presentations 3.1 Venture Taranaki 4. Whakaaetia ngā Menīti / Confirmation of Minutes 4.1 Ordinary Council 21 September 2020 ........................................................................... Page 8 5. Ngā Menīti Komiti me ngā Poari / Committee and Board Minutes 5.1 Extraordinary Environment and Hearings Committee 23 September 2020 ......................... Page 20 5.2 Eltham-Kaponga Community Board 5 October 2020 ........................................................... Page 26 5.3 Te Hāwera Community Board 5 October 2020 ..................................................................... Page 32 5.4 Taranaki Coastal Community Board 6 October 2020 ........................................................... Page 39 5.5 Pātea Community Board 7 October 2020 ............................................................................ -
Acidising Case Study – Kawerau Injection Wells
PROCEEDINGS, Thirty-Sixth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, January 31 - February 2, 2011 SGP-TR-191 ACIDISING CASE STUDY – KAWERAU INJECTION WELLS Yoong Wei Lim1, Malcolm Grant2, Kevin Brown3, Christine Siega1 and Farrell Siega1 1 Mighty River Power, 283 Vaughan Road, Rotorua, New Zealand 2 MAGAK, 208D Runciman Road, RD2 Pukekohe 2677 New Zealand 3 GEOKEM, P.O. Box 30-125, St Martins, Christchurch, New Zealand e-mail: 1 [email protected]; ABSTRACT Brine at the Kawerau Geothermal Limited (KGL) plant was injected into three injection wells (KA43, KA44 and PK4A). Since plant commissioning, the capacity of the wells declined to the point where well intervention was necessary to avoid loss of generation. Investigative work was initiated with multi-rate injection tests which found that the injection index of the wells had declined significantly to approximately half of pre-utilisation levels. Further geochemistry analysis identified that the most likely source of injectivity decline was scaling due to colloidal silica forming in the formation. KA44 and PK4A were acidised using a standard 10% hydrochloric acid pre-flush followed by a 10%:5% HF:HCL mud acid solution. A 2” coil tubing unit with a 5 hole 45º nozzle bottom hole assembly was used giving a maximum pump rate of 3.5 - 4.0 barrels per minute. Feedzones were acidised one at a time starting with the deeper zones. Post well injection tests identified that the acidising Figure 1: Location of the Kawerau Geothermal Field had recovered the injectivity of the deeper feedzones but the shallower feedzones remain blocked with Silica precipitation at Kawerau has been a concern scale. -
Waitomo District Council Meeting
1 Document No: A411712 Report To: Council Meeting Date: 30 October 2018 Subject: Motion to Exclude the Public for the Consideration of Council Business Purpose of Report 1.1 The purpose of this business paper is to enable the Council to consider whether or not the public should be excluded from the consideration of Council business. Commentary 2.1 Section 48 of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 gives Council the right by resolution to exclude the public from the whole or any part of the proceedings of any meeting only on one or more of the grounds contained within that Section. Suggested Resolutions 1 The public be excluded from the following part of the proceedings of this meeting. 2 Council agree the following staff, having relevant knowledge, remain in attendance to assist Council with its decision making: … 3 The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows: Section 48(1) General Subject of each Reason for passing this resolution grounds for matter to be considered in relation to each matter this resolution 1. Contractual Issues: 7(2)(i) Enable any local authority 48(1)(d) 12 Month Review holding the information to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) 2. Contractual Issues: 7(2)(i) Enable any local authority 48(1)(d) Setting of 2018/2019 holding the information to carry on, KPIs without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) 2 This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act or Section 6, Section 7 or Section 9 of the Official Information Act 1982 as the case may require are listed above. -
HRE05002-038.Pdf(PDF, 152
Appendix S: Parties Notified List of tables Table S1: Government departments and Crown agencies notified ........................... 837 Table S2: Interested parties notified .......................................................................... 840 Table S3: Interested Māori parties ............................................................................ 847 Table S1: Government departments and Crown agencies notified Job Title Organisation City Manager Biosecurity Greater Wellington - The Regional Council Masterton 5915 Environment Health Officer Wairoa District Council Wairoa 4192 Ministry of Research, Science & Wellington 6015 Technology (MoRST) Manager, Animal Containment AgResearch Limited Hamilton 2001 Facility Group Manager, Legal AgResearch Limited Hamilton Policy Analyst Human Rights Commission Auckland 1036 Management, Monitoring & Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs Wellington 6015 Governance Fish & Game Council of New Zealand Wellington 6032 Engineer Land Transport Safety Authority Wellington 6015 Senior Fisheries Officer Fish & Game Eastern Region Rotorua 3220 Adviser Ministry of Research, Science & Wellington 6015 Technology (MoRST) Programme Manager Environment Waikato Hamilton 2032 Biosecurity Manager Environment Southland Invercargill 9520 Dean of Science and University of Waikato Hamilton 3240 Technology Director National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Wellington 6041 Research Limited (NIWA) Chief Executive Officer Horticulture and Food Research Institute Auckland 1020 (HortResearch Auckland) Team Leader Regulatory -
Kawerau Geothermal System Management Plan
KAWERAU GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN February 2018 Prepared in Collaboration with Executive Summary The Kawerau Geothermal System is located to the north-east of Kawerau within the Bay of Plenty Region, and partially underlies the township of Kawerau. It has been substantially developed for industrial purposes pursuant to resource consents granted by the Bay of Plenty Regional Council (BOPRC) under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). This includes geothermal energy being used for electricity generation, industrial processes (direct heat) and cultural purposes. Bay of Plenty Regional Council has functions under Section 30 of the RMA for the management of geothermal resources. The Bay of Plenty Regional Policy Statement (RPS) requires the preparation of a System Management Plan (SMP) for the Kawerau Geothermal System as a key part of the way in which BOPRC intends to manage the Kawerau Geothermal System. This SMP has been prepared in collaboration with the four consent holders authorised to take more than 1,000 tonnes per day of geothermal fluid from the Kawerau Geothermal System, being: Mercury NZ Limited, Ngāti Tūwharetoa Geothermal Assets Limited, Geothermal Developments Ltd, and Te Ahi O Māui Partnership. Engagement has also been undertaken with tangata whenua and interested and potentially affected parties, including industrial operators using the geothermal resource. The purpose of this SMP is to ensure that the Kawerau Geothermal System is managed in a sustainable manner in accordance with the requirements of the RMA and the relevant policy and planning documents prepared under the RMA. The content anticipated in an SMP is set out in Policy GR7B of the RPS and includes objectives for its overall management and strategies to achieve the objectives The SMP is a non-statutory document and will be periodically reviewed and updated to ensure that it remains relevant and fit for purpose. -
Récapitulatif Finale Pays Artiste Chanson Points Du Jury Points Du
Récapitulatif Finale Points du Points du Pays Artiste Chanson Total Classement Jury Télévote Lituanie The Roop On Fire 237 195 432 1 Suisse Gjon's Tears Répondez-Moi 192 212 404 2 Bulgarie Victoria Tears Getting Sober 173 150 323 3 Suède The Mamas Move 175 133 308 4 Malte Destiny All Of My Love 148 145 293 5 Islande Daði & Gagnamagnið Think About Things 134 133 267 6 Allemagne Ben Dolic Violent Thing 139 121 260 7 Italie Diodato Fai rumore 95 145 240 8 Norvège Ulrikke Attention 121 109 230 9 Russie Little Big Uno 129 95 224 10 Ukraine Go_A Solovey 106 95 201 11 Israël Eden Alene Feker Libi 87 83 170 12 Danemark Ben & Tan YES 88 71 159 13 Grèce Stefania Superg!rl 76 62 138 14 Australie Montaigne Don't Break Me 35 76 111 15 Roumanie Roxen Alcohol You 38 71 109 16 France Tom Leeb The Best In Me 16 93 109 17 Lettonie Samanta Tīna Still Breathing 46 62 108 18 Albanie Arilena Ara Fall From The Sky 58 45 103 19 Belgique Hooverphonic Release Me 53 50 103 20 Serbie Hurricane Hasta La Vista 38 59 97 21 Pays-Bas Jeangu Macrooy Grow 39 45 84 22 Pologne Alicja Empires 43 38 81 23 Espagne Blas Cantó Universo 37 33 70 24 Autriche Vincent Bueno Alive 41 29 70 25 Royaume-Uni James Newman My Last Breath 34 26 60 26 Total 2378 2378 4756 Détail Télévote Détail Jury Nombre de Votes : 570 % Nombre de Points du Classement Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Jury Classement Pays Artiste Chanson Pays -
Kawerau AS and Other Blocks
r RECEIVED CLADMIN lq '4. I ~ .,.... r<)l..-- ,.....,..-._ ................ 1 Kawerau AS and other blocks by Sharyn Green This report was commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal for the claim by JH Fox for Tuwharetoa Te Atua Reretahi Trust Board relating to Te Wai U 0 Tuwharetoa (Wai 21) Any conclusions drawn or opinions expressed are those of the author Introduction My name is Sharyn Green (N gati Maniapoto) and I am employed as a researcher for the Waitangi Tribunal. I have produced research reports for the Waitangi Tribunal on Wai 247, 248, and 238. I have a law degree from the University of Otago in Dunedin and I am an admitted barrister and solicitor of the court as of October 1992. I completed some Maori studies papers while at the University of Otago and tutored Maori language for the department for three years. I was commissioned by the tribunal to produce this report in May 1992. This report concerns an ancillary claim to Wai 62. Wai 62 was lodged with the Waitangi Tribunal by John Henry Fox, Beverly Adlam, and William Savage of the iwi Tuwharetoa ki Kawerau, in 1988. That claim concerns lands confiscated by the Crown pursuant to legislation in the 1860s following the New Zealand wars.1 This ancillary claim to Wai 62 concerns Tasman Pulp and Paper Mill Ltd (Tasman) creating part of an effluent treatment system on land where the rangatira Tuwharetoa had a pa, and features other sites considered significant by Ngati Tuwharetoa. This report is confined to discussing the establishment of this system. -
Western Bay of Plenty District Council Council Chief Executive Officers
347 Local Government Members (2019/20) Determination Schedule 2 2019 Te Awamutu Community Board Office Annual remuneration ($) Chairperson 18,132 Member 9,006 Wairoa District Council Office Annual remuneration ($) Mayor 101,000 Councillor (Minimum Allowable Remuneration) 23,961 Waitaki District Council Annual remuneration Office ($) Mayor 114,500 Councillor (Minimum Allowable Remuneration) 24,125 Ahuriri Community Board Office Annual remuneration ($) Chairperson 11,639 Member 5,820 Waihemo Community Board Office Annual remuneration ($) Chairperson 12,087 Member 6,044 Waitomo District Council Office Annual remuneration ($) Mayor 97,500 Councillor (Minimum Allowable Remuneration) 23,731 Wellington City Council Office Annual remuneration ($) Mayor 180,500 Councillor (Minimum Allowable Remuneration) 86,874 Makara-Ohariu Community Board Office Annual remuneration ($) Chairperson 9,429 Member 4,716 Tawa Community Board Office Annual remuneration ($) Chairperson 18,810 66 348 Local Government Members (2019/20) Determination 2019 Schedule 2 Office Annual remuneration ($) Member 9,405 Western Bay of Plenty District Council Office Annual remuneration ($) Mayor 136,500 Councillor (Minimum Allowable Remuneration) 32,959 Katikati Community Board Office Annual remuneration ($) Chairperson 11,008 Member 5,504 Maketu Community Board Office Annual remuneration ($) Chairperson 5,827 Member 2,914 Omokoroa Community Board Office Annual remuneration ($) Chairperson 7,987 Member 3,993 Te Puke Community Board Office Annual remuneration ($) Chairperson 11,008