Worksheet from RJ Tarr at / 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Worksheet from RJ Tarr at / 1 Worksheet from RJ Tarr at www.activehistory.co.uk / 1 Causes of World War One: Summary Sheet Name Theme Key Quote Narrative Analysis ▪ 1878 Treaty of Berlin : Serbia made independent, ▪ Both Austro-Hungary and Serbia were backed up Bosnia placed under Austrian administration. by a world power: Germany on the one hand, • 1914 Assassination Austria = uses imperialism (“Kultur”) as justification Russia on the other. • 1878 Treaty of for rule; Serbia = uses Nationalism (“Pan-Slavism”) ▪ A war between Austro-Hungary and Serbia would Berlin Austria v. Nationalism v. ▪ 1908: Austria annexed Bosnia. Serbia feels likely draw in Germany and Russia. • 1908 Bosnian Serbia Imperialism threatened, by Russia too weak after Russo- ▪ Russia's alliance with France meant that Crisis Japanese war to back her up. Germany had to anticipate a "War on Two Fronts" • 1912-13 Balkan ▪ 1913: Second Balkan War. Serbia doubled in so she formed the Schlieffen Plan, which meant Wars size. Austria feels threatened, but has no pretext to invasion of France via Belgium which in turn declare war. involved Britain. ▪ 1871: Franco Prussian War : Germany formed ▪ The Triple Alliance: “Dreikaiserbund” with Austria and Russia to defend Too binding. This military agreement gave birth to herself against “Revanchist” claims of France to the Blank Cheque” and the “Schlieffen Plan” which Alsace-Lorraine was disastrous since they which relied upon • Bismarck > Franco- ▪ 1878: Treaty of Berlin creates tension between declaring war as a first, rather than a last resort, Prussian War Austria and Russia over Balkans; Dreikaiserbund against both countries. • Alsace-Lorraine starts to collapse; Dual Alliance between Germany Germany v. • Dreikaiserbund Alliance System and Austria. Italy joins 1881 = Triple Alliance ▪ The Triple Entente: Russia • Triple Entente / ▪ 1890: The “New Course” - Germany decides her Too loose. The fact that this was an Entente, not a Triple Alliance future lies with Austria; makes overtures to Britain, binding military alliance, meant that Britain’s • War on Two Fronts snubs Russia position remained unclear throughout the July > Schlieffen Plan ▪ 1894: Franco-Russian Entente Crisis; had Grey made Britain’s position clearer, ▪ 1904: Entente Cordiale Germany may well have backed down. ▪ 1907: Anglo-Russian Entente = Triple Entente • "Place in the Sun" ▪ 1901: “Place in the Sun” speech – Kaiser ▪ These crises created tension between Germany Speech announces Germany wants an Empire on the one hand, and France and Britain on the • Anglo-French = ▪ 1904: Entente Cordiale – Britain agrees to other. Germany v. Spheres of Influence recognise French claims in Morocco ; France ▪ This meant that it was all the more likely that the Colonial Rivalry France • Morocco 1905 / recognises British claims in Egypt alliance system would create a domino effect if a Algeciras ▪ 1905: 1st Morroccan Crisis – Britain stands by war broke out in the Balkans: Germany would have Conference France against Germany at the Algeciras no hesitation attacking France, and Britain would • Morroco 1911 / Conference have little hesitation in retaliating against Germany. Worksheet from RJ Tarr at www.activehistory.co.uk / 2 Mansion House ▪ 1911: 2nd Morroccan Crisis – Britain stands by Speech France against Germany in the Mansion House Speech ▪ 1896 : Kruger Telegram : Kaiser congratulates ▪ The naval race created massive Anglo-German Boers on defeating the British tension. • Kruger Telegram ▪ 1898, 1900: German Naval Laws via Admiral ▪ It was both a cause and a consequence of British • Berlin-Baghdad Tirpitz refusal to support Germany during the Morroccan Railway ▪ 1906: Dreadnought makes other battleships Crises (=symbiotic relationship). Germany v. • Dreadnought Arms race obsolete ▪ It drove Britain into the arms of France and Britain • Peers v. People ▪ 1908: Daily Telegraph Interview – Wilhelm calls hardened the alliance system. • Daily Telegraph the British “Mad as March Hares” Interview ▪ 1911: Constitutional Crisis: A special “People’s • Admiral Tirpitz Budget” to fund the naval race creates massive tensions between the Houses of Commons/Lords. ▪ 28/06/1914: Assassination of Franz Ferdinand ▪ The “Blank Cheque”, Russia’s early mobilisation (=Austria) by Black Hand Gang member Princip and the “Schlieffen Plan” closed off diplomatic • Colonel Apis (=Serbia). routes incredibly clearly. • Blank Cheque ▪ Serbia rejected the Austrian ultimatum; Austria • Ultimatum declares war after Germany gives Austria a “Blank General July Crisis • Willy-Nicky Cheque”. Telegrams ▪ Willy-Nicky telegrams: Kaiser and Tsar try to • Schlieffen Plan > avert the crisis but dialogue breaks down when AJP Taylor Russia mobilises and Germany has to activate the Schlieffen Plan. .
Recommended publications
  • Adobe PDF File
    BOOK REVIEWS David B. Quinn. European Approaches to North analyse social and demographic trends and so America, 1450-1640. Variorum Collected Studies; have been unfashionable for more than a decade" Aldershot and Brookfield, VT: Variorum Press, (221). It is, however, useful for historians and 1998. x + 342 pp., illustrations, maps, charts, others interested in the past to know what hap• index. US $101.95, cloth; ISBN 0-86078-769-9. pened, or at least what is likely to have happened. Quinn may be no exponent of the latest Paris fad This most recent collection of David Quinn's but he remains a scholar whose interpretation of essays on the early European exploration and events inevitably commands respect, precisely settlement of North America follows his Explor• because he is always more interested in making ers and Colonies: America, 1500-1625 (London, sense of the document than in validating a theo• 1990). Like its useful predecessor, European retical preconception. Approaches brings together Quinn's contributions What of the longer essays in this volume, in to several disparate publications. Although most which Quinn cautiously dons the unfamiliar of the essays in the present volume have appeared analytic robe? "Englishmen and Others" is a blunt in scholarly journals or conference proceedings and therefore interesting assessment of how since the late 1980s, that previous exposure does Quinn's compatriots viewed themselves and other not detract from the usefulness of this book. The Europeans on the eve of colonization. The final topics range from imagined Atlantic islands, to essay, "Settlement Patterns in Early Modern perceptions of American ecology, the French fur Colonization," is an analysis of the state of early trade, the settlement of Bermuda, editing Hakluyt, European colonization by 1700.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of the First World War Lesson 4 the Arms Race
    Lesson 4 The Arms Race CAUSES OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR LESSON 4 THE ARMS RACE Objectives/learning outcomes Starter Pupils will:- Discuss with pupils why countries need weapons. What are the threats today? What Know what the term ‘arms race’ were the threats in 1914? means and why this increased the How much does Britain spend on defence? tension between the major powers. Show diagram. Understand why the building of the Get pupils to understand the amount in dreadnought led to a naval arms comparison to other government spending. race. Defence: £44bn Education: £42bn Transport: Evaluate through sources whether £15bn. Germany wanted a war in 1914. Explain Militarism: building up armed forces; getting ready for war. Can this be applied to some countries today? Why did this happen up to 1914? Activities and homework Plenary Give pupils the following words/phrases:- Activity 1 The Arms Race Fear Activity 2 Jealousy The Dreadnought and the Naval Arms Naval Superiority Race Empire building [A linked cause] Activity 3 Worsening relations Did Germany want a war in 1914? More money spent on armaments Ask them to start with one word/phrase and Homework answer orally the question, ‘How did the arms Homework 1 Cartoon Analysis race help cause the First World War?’ [Advanced] Homework 1 Admiral Von Tirpitz They can use any of the other words/phrases [Standard] to answer the question. Causes of the First World War History Interactive© 1 Lesson 4 The Arms Race STARTER ACTIVITY Britain’s Defence Spending 2009 Equipment • £6.1bn Pay • £5.6bn • £2.6bn Wars Afghanistan • £2bn Iraq War pensions • £1bn Weapons • 27bn About £45 billion Causes of the First World War History Interactive© 2 Lesson 4 The Arms Race ACTIVITY 1 THE ARMS RACE How did the Arms Race add to the tensions between the major powers? ARMS RACE This was competition between countries to build up their military strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    BINDEX 06/25/2018 18:16:29 Page 379 INDEX ‘Ndrangheta, 261 Ambedkar, B. R., 115, 150, 238, 273, 1848 revolutions, 306 282, 311 1955 System, 137 American Civil War, 94 9/11, 178, 269, 273, 301, 302 American Constitution, 109, 318 Amin al-Husseini, Haj, 100 Aam Aadmi Party, 311 Amin, Idi, 127, 255 Abdullah of Jordan, King, 120 Amritsar Massacre (1919), 30, 48 Abe, Shinzo, 317 anarchism, 5, 10, 44, 61, 159, 219, 306 Aborigines, 38, 74, 265, 272, 275 Andaman Islands, 267 Abyssinia, 97, 250, 265 Anglo-Boer War, 16, 31, 39 Action Française, 59, 67, 81, 109, 225 Anglo-Egyptian Treaty (1936), 55 Adenauer, Konrad, 109, 132, 244 Anglo-Hindu law, 278 Advani, L. K., 171 Anglo-Iraq treaties; (1926), (1932) African National Congress, 142, 155, Anglo-Muhammadan law, 278 156, 176, 281, 312 Anglo-Russian Entente (1907), 22 Afrikaners, 31, 73, 127, 155, 279 animals in war, 210, 295 agricultural reforms, 54, 63, 75, 84, 85, Antarctica, 15 94, 119, 124, 127, 129, 134, 135, 146, Anthropocene, 214, 287, 295, 296 151, 153, 185, 232, 284, 291, 297, 307, Anthropology, 8, 179, 183, 186–189, 309, 316 192, 232, 234, 296 Ahmadiyya, 168, 234 anti-fascist resistance, 133 AIDS, 204, 205, 288, 289, 312, 323 Anti-French War, 123 Alawites, 22, 280 anti-hunting protests, 210, 295 Alexander I of Yugoslavia, King, 62 anti-Nazi resistance, 65 Alger Hiss case, 110 anti-Semitism, 16, 60, 66, 81, 100, 103, Algerian War of Independence,COPYRIGHTED 185 197, 243, 251,MATERIAL 256, 299, 308 Algérie Française, 156 Anti-US War, 123 Ali, Mehmet, 239, 240 anti-Vietnam War protests, 143, 200 Ali, Muhammad, 210 Antonius, George, 22, 28 Aligarh Muslim University, 207 Apartheid, 90, 127, 135, 156, 163, 174, Allahabad, 111, 276 176, 210, 255, 268, 279, 285, 296, 311, Allende, Salvador, 159 312 Allied Powers (First World War), 13, 96 Appadurai, Arjun, 6, 299 Remaking the Modern World 1900–2015: Global Connections and Comparisons, First Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 History Standard Grade − Credit Finalised Marking
    © 2010 History Standard Grade − Credit Finalised Marking Instructions © Scottish Qualifications Authority 2010 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only on a non- commercial basis. If it is to be used for any other purposes written permission must be obtained from the External Print Team, Centre Services, Dalkeith. Where the publication includes materials from sources other than SQA (secondary copyright), this material should only be reproduced for the purposes of examination or assessment. If it needs to be reproduced for any other purpose it is the centre’s responsibility to obtain the necessary copyright clearance. SQA’s External Print Team, Centre Services, at Dalkeith may be able to direct you to the secondary sources. These Marking Instructions have been prepared by Examination Teams for use by SQA Appointed Markers when marking External Course Assessments. This publication must not be reproduced for commercial or trade purposes. Information for markers The following general instructions are provided for the guidance of markers at all levels. It is vitally important that all markers are totally familiar with the candidate performance requirements, as set out in the correct arrangements document, for both assessable elements at each level in terms of: process; the place of recalled evidence where this is required. Marking conventions Markers must carefully observe the following points: All marking on candidate scripts must be in red biro. All marking must be carefully placed in the correct column on the right of the script: KU marks in the left column; ES marks in the right column. Half marks must not be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting the Enemy British-German Encounters in the Occupied Rhineland After the First World War
    Angles New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10 | 2020 Creating the Enemy Meeting the Enemy British-German Encounters in the Occupied Rhineland after the First World War Tom Williams Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/angles/488 DOI: 10.4000/angles.488 ISSN: 2274-2042 Publisher Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur Electronic reference Tom Williams, « Meeting the Enemy », Angles [Online], 10 | 2020, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 28 July 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/angles/488 ; DOI : https://doi.org/ 10.4000/angles.488 This text was automatically generated on 28 July 2020. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Meeting the Enemy 1 Meeting the Enemy British-German Encounters in the Occupied Rhineland after the First World War Tom Williams 1 Negative stereotypes of the German enemy were so pervasive in Britain during the First World War that, when crossing into German territory at the end of the conflict, the writer and social reformer Violet Markham remarked that it was “almost with a shock that you realise that German civilians are not equipped with hoofs and horns or other attributes of a Satanic character” (Markham 1921: 15). Visions of a brutal, arrogant, warmongering “Hun”, disseminated since 1914 in British propaganda as a means of justifying wartime mobilization and sacrifice, proved difficult to sustain once British soldiers and civilians met individual Germans face-to-face in the occupied Rhineland. However effective they may be as a propaganda tool for galvanising public opinion in wartime, enemy images inevitably require a process of psychological abstraction, relying on a set of beliefs and assumptions that often bear little relation to socio- historical realities or individual experiences (Rieber & Kelly 1991; Oppenheimer 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Side of the Global Imbalances: the Politics of Economic Reform in China Under the ‘New Normal’
    The Other Side of the Global Imbalances: The Politics of Economic Reform in China Under the ‘New Normal’ Chen Xie PhD University of York Politics March 2018 2 Abstract In the 21st century, the ‘rise of China’ in the post-financial crisis period is arguably the most important and widely debated topic in politics and international studies. Since, the 2008 financial crisis, compared with the US, whose power appears to have diminished, it seems more and more likely that China will soon become the engine of the world economy and, perhaps, one day the global hegemon. Although the financial crisis may have not, in itself, fundamentally changed the shape of the global order, it has arguably altered perceptions. This is especially so regarding the ‘global imbalances’ that are said to have provided the macro-economic conditions for the crisis to occur. Equally, the different positions occupied by the US - as the world’s largest debtor - and China - as the world’s largest creditor - both prior to and after the crisis are suggestive of a fundamental power shift in the global order. In this thesis, I aim to add to existing understandings of the rise of China by examining the relationship between its rise and the global imbalances in the contemporary order. In order to address my thesis questions, I utilise concepts and arguments about the relationship between power, institutions and the global order provided by different scholars and theoretical traditions in IPE. Based on these, I review the experiences of Britain and the US in three key historical periods of global imbalance in 19th and 20th centuries that are analogous to the role of China in the contemporary global imbalances.
    [Show full text]
  • A Naval Power Dataset, 1865-20111
    Power At Sea: A Naval Power Dataset, 1865-20111 Brian Benjamin Crisher Florida State University Mark Souva Florida State University Abstract Naval power is a crucial element of state power, yet existing naval datasets are limited to a small number of states and ship types. Here we present 147 years of naval data on all the world’s navies from 1865 to 2011. This country-year dataset focuses on warships with ship-based weapons capable of using kinetic force to inflict damage on other structures or peoples. After identifying a country’s active naval forces, we create a measure of naval power based on the aggregate tonnage of the active ships. Additionally, we create count variables for ship types such as aircraft carriers or battleships. This paper introduces the country-year data, describes variables of interests for use in country-year, dyadic, or systemic studies and suggests potential questions of interest scholars could explore using the naval power dataset. 1 We are grateful to David Abitbol, Cameron Cankaya, and Spencer Willis for their hard work as coders on this project. The project also benefited from feedback and suggestions received from the reviewers of International Interactions. Dataset, replication files, and online appendix can be downloaded from the International Interactions Dataverse webpage: http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/internationalinteractions. The naval data will also be available at www.briancrisher.net. Address correspondence to Brian B. Crisher, Department of Political Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. Email: [email protected] B. Crisher and M. Souva Naval power affects international interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2013 Series
    CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS Pre-U Certificate MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2013 series 9769 HISTORY 9769/13 Paper 1c (British History Outlines, 1689–2000), maximum raw mark 90 This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers. Cambridge will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes. Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2013 series for most IGCSE, Pre-U, GCE Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level components and some Ordinary Level components. www.theallpapers.com Page 2 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper Pre-U – May/June 2013 9769 13 These banding definitions address Assessment Objectives 1, 2 and 4, and should be used in conjunction with the indicative content mark schemes for each question. Introduction (a) The banding definitions which follow reflect, and must be interpreted within the context of, the following general statement: Examiners should give their highest marks to candidates who show a ready understanding of the relevant material and a disciplined management of the discussion the question provokes. They should be impressed more by critical judgement, careful discrimination and imaginative handling than by a weight of facts. Credit should be given for evidence of a good historical intelligence and for good use of perhaps unremarkable material rather than for a stereotyped rehearsal of memorised information.
    [Show full text]
  • British Public Opinion with Regard to Germany
    BRITISH PUBLIC OPINION WITH REGARD TO GERMANY 1890 to 1914". - by - Robert Joseph. Boroughs A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Apts in the Department/of Historjr. UNIVERSITY 0E BRITISH COLUMBIA October, 19 4 3. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Chapter I Public Opinion and The Press. .• 1 - 6A Chapter II Influential Public Opinion 1890-1914- 7 - 13 Chapter III British Foreign Policy 1890-1914. 14 - 29 Chapter IV Expressions of Opinion In Regard To Germany . 30 - 57 Chapter V Public Opinion and Foreign Policy. 58 - 62A Appendix I Bibliographic Notes on the British Press 63-69 Appendix II Key to the Relation between Political and Foreign Policy 1890-1914 ..... 69A- 690- CHAPTER ONE "Public opinion is no more than this, What people think that other people think." Alfred Austin, Prince Lucifer, Act VI, Sc.2 PUBLIC OPINION AND THE PRESS One of the vagaries of our English language is that we may use terms which at once convey to our readers our com• plete Idea and yet while connoting all so hedge our thought with an aura of generality that no tangible impression is made. The term "public opinion" may be considered to be a classic example of such specific vagueness. James Bryce once described public opinion as, " a congeries of all sorts of discrepant notions, beliefs, fancies, prejudices, aspirations. It is confused, incoherent, amorphous, varying from, day to day and week to week."1 We need not be too nonplussed by Lord Bryce's defini• tion, however, for Professor Carroll has defined It simply as "the composite reactions of the general public," This is an.
    [Show full text]
  • Eduard Bernstein on Social Democracy and International Politics Essays and Other Writings
    EDUARD BERNSTEIN ON SOCIAL DEMOCRACY AND INTERNATIONAL POLITICS ESSAYS AND OTHER WRITINGS Marius S. Ostrowski Eduard Bernstein on Social Democracy and International Politics Marius S. Ostrowski Eduard Bernstein on Social Democracy and International Politics Essays and Other Writings Marius S. Ostrowski All Souls College University of Oxford Oxford, UK ISBN 978-3-319-70780-8 ISBN 978-3-319-70781-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70781-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017962425 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision 8 Mark Essay Question
    DALZIEL HIGH SCHOOL HISTORY DEPARTMENT REVISION FOR THE STANDARD GRADE 8 MARK ESSAY Within this booklet there is SQA information regarding past paper 8 mark questions. Read through the questions and the marking instructions to help you with your revision. Remember an 8 mark question requires you to write an introduction and a conclusion. The essay must also be constructed in paragraphs, 1 mark will be awarded for each relevant piece of correctly applied evidence up to a maximum of 6 marks. Each piece of evidence may only be developed for a maximum of 1 additional mark. A further 2 marks may be awarded for process, ie whether the response is indeed an “essay”, constructed in paragraphs, at least two and separate from, a valid introduction and a clear conclusion. Such additional marks should be indicated as + 1 or + 2. A total mark should be written in the appropriate box. ESSAY QUESTIONS AND MARKING INSTRUCTIONS 2010 : How important as a cause of the First World War was: EITHER (a) the Naval Arms Race between Britain and Germany? OR (b) rivalry between Austria-Hungary and Russia in the Balkans? Naval Arms Race • Britain was convinced Germany was building a navy to threaten Britain • Germany was convinced Britain was trying to stop her from becoming a Great Power • British attitudes to naval supremacy – Two Power Standard/Britain as an island needed a strong navy • impact of German Naval Laws • details of Naval Rivalry/Naval Arms Race • impact of Dreadnoughts – new features, made other ships obsolete, Naval Race restarts • Germany was determined to build a bigger navy than Britain • impact of new naval bases on the Naval Arms Race • impact of widening the Kiel Canal – easier for Germany to get into the North Sea • British need for command of the seas/fear of invasion/protect trade/defend Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • IB History Study Guide
    Notum sit universis et singulis, quorum interest aut quomodolibet interesse potest, potest, interesse quomodolibet aut interest quorum singulis, et universis sit Notum postquam a multis annis orta in Imperio Romano dissidia motusque civiles eo usque usque eo civiles motusque dissidia Romano Imperio in orta annis multis a postquam increverunt, ut non modo universam Germaniam, sed et aliquot finitima regna, regna, finitima aliquot et sed Germaniam, universam modo non ut increverunt, potissimum vero Galliam, ita involverint, ut diuturnum et acre exinde natum sit bellum, bellum, sit natum exinde acre et diuturnum ut involverint, ita Galliam, vero potissimum primo quidem inter serenissimum et potentissimum principem ac dominum, dominum dominum dominum, ac principem potentissimum et serenissimum inter quidem primo Ferdinandum II., electum Romanorum imperatorem, semper augustum, Germaniae, Germaniae, augustum, semper imperatorem, Romanorum electum II., Ferdinandum Hungariae, Bohemiae, Dalmatiae, Croatiae, Sclavoniae regem, archiducem Austriae, Austriae, archiducem regem, Sclavoniae Croatiae, Dalmatiae, Bohemiae, Hungariae, ducem Burgundiae, Brabantiae, Styriae, Carinthiae, Carniolae, marchionem Moraviae, Moraviae, marchionem Carniolae, Carinthiae, Styriae, Brabantiae, Burgundiae, ducem ducem Luxemburgiae, Superioris ac Inferioris Silesiae, Wurtembergae et Teckae, Teckae, et Wurtembergae Silesiae, Inferioris ac Superioris Luxemburgiae, ducem principem Sueviae, comitem Habsburgi, Tyrolis, Kyburgi et Goritiae, marchionem Sacri Sacri marchionem Goritiae,
    [Show full text]