DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia and the Dilemmas of Nuclear Disarmament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INSTITUTE OF WORLD ECONOMY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVE RUSSIA AND THE DILEMMAS OF NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT Edited by Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin and Sergey Oznobishchev Moscow IMEMO RAN 2012 УДК 327.37(470) ББК 66.4 (2 Рос) Rus 95 Authors: Alexei Arbatov (I.4, I.5; II.4; III.2, III.3; IV.2; V.1, V.2; VI.4, VI.9), Vladimir Baranovsky (VI.10), Vladimir Dvorkin (I.1, I.2; II.2; III.1; IV.1; VI.1, VI.8), Anatoly Dyakov (V.4), Victor Yesin (VI.6), Raymond Jeanloz (VI.2), Edward Ifft (VI.5), Sergey Oznobishchev (I.3; II.3; III.4; IV.2), Alexander Pikaev (I.3; IV.3, IV.6), Jules Silberberg (II. 1), Viktor Slipchenko (V.3), Peter Topychkanov (IV.7), Malcolm Chalmers (VI.3), James Acton (VI.7). Rus 95 Russia and the Dilemmas of Nuclear Disarmament / Eds. A.G. Arbatov, V.Z.Dvorkin, S.K.Oznobishchev. – M.: IMEMO RAN, 2012. – 264 p. ISBN 978-5-9535-0330-3 This book embraces the topics analyzed under the joint project implemented by the Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) and the Nuclear Threat Initiative, Inc. (NTI) and titled “Russia and the Deep Nuclear Disarmament”. This research report was commissioned by the Nuclear Security Project (NSP) of the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI). For more information see the NSP website at http://www.nuclear security.org. The views expressed in this paper are entirely the authors' own and not those of the IMEMO or NSP. The book is intended for specialists in international relations and security and the public in general. To view IMEMO RAN publications, please visit our website at http://www.imemo.ru ISBN 978-5-9535-0330-3 © IMEMO RAN, 2012 CONTENTS PREFACE ....................................................................................................................7 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................11 PART I. STRATEGIC STABILITY AFTER THE COLD WAR I.1. Strategic stability in the cold war era...............................................................13 I.2. Factors affecting strategic stability ..................................................................17 I.3. Destabilizing factors in the new environment..................................................23 I.4. Russia’s perceptions of the United States military policy................................25 I.5. China and stability............................................................................................27 PART II. СONTEMPORARY NUCLEAR DOCTRINES II.1. US nuclear posture review 2010.....................................................................41 II.2. Russia’s nuclear strategy ................................................................................45 II.3. Evolution of NATO nuclear doctrine .............................................................50 II.4. Comparative analysis of modern nuclear doctrines ........................................58 PART III. NON-NUCLEAR FACTORS OF NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT III.1. Prospects for cooperation between Russia and US on ballistic missile defense..............................................................................................65 III.2. Strategic offensive conventional weapons ....................................................72 III.3. Space weapons...............................................................................................82 III.4. Nonarmament of space..................................................................................88 PART IV. REGIONAL PROBLEMS OF DISARMAMENT IV.1. Russia and NATO after the cold war ............................................................95 IV.2. European security: searching for a new architecture...................................103 IV.3. Non-strategic nuclear weapons ...................................................................109 IV.4. Russia, NATO and BMD programs ............................................................119 IV.5. NATO and the prospects of the CFE Treaty ...............................................123 IV.6. Third nuclear states .....................................................................................131 IV.7. Middle and Far East, South Asia.................................................................135 PART V. NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT AND NON-PROLIFERATION V.1. Dialectics of disarmament and non-proliferation .........................................146 V.2. Issues of strengthening the NPT...................................................................155 V.3. Prohibition of nuclear tests ...........................................................................162 V.4. Nuclear warheads and weapon-grade materials ...........................................170 6 CONTENTS PART VI. PROSPECTS FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF NUCLEAR DETERRENCE VI.1. Transforming nuclear deterrence through cooperation in BMD .................179 VI.2. Prospects of cooperative BMD and nuclear deterrence ..............................182 VI.3. Cooperation on BMD: possibility not panacea ...........................................185 VI.4. Mutual renunciation of the launch-on-warning concept .............................192 VI.5. Reducing the operational readiness of ballistic missiles ............................200 VI.6. Transforming nuclear deterrence through transparency..............................206 VI.7. Transparency and strategic stability............................................................210 VI.8. The Prague START Treaty and the prospects of further arms reductions.....218 VI.9. The powers' foreign and military policy as a factor of disarmament ..........223 VI.10. Ensuring peace and stability on the way to nuclear disarmament.............235 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................242 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1.Articles of the prominent public figures of USA and Russia.........251 Attachment 2. Table. Variants of military doctrine. Role of nuclear weapons.......259 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................260 PREFACE This book outlines the main results of the joint project implemented by IMEMO RAN and the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) in 2010-2011. Its principal objective was to provide expert analysis of opportunities for transition to deep nuclear disarmament and the major obstacles to that. In Russia and the US, as well as in other P-5 states a belief has been widely spread that only nuclear weapons continue to reliably guarantee national security. Unfortunately, this viewpoint is also shared by the so-called new nuclear-weapon states, i.e. countries that have acquired nuclear weapons in different ways in the recent ten years, and the nations that are only striving for it. Meanwhile, several important considerations make the universal character of these conventional truths seem quite doubtful. Now that the Cold War is over, with the current globalization and increasing global interdependency (to which the current economy crisis has been yet another illustration), nuclear deterrence seems to prevent the threats of the past, the 20th century threats. That is to say, it prevents deliberate nuclear or massive conventional attacks of major powers or their alliances against each other. This threat is now extremely low in its prob- ability and significance. At the same time, nuclear deterrence does not address the real threats of modern times, such as international terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and their delivery systems, ethnic and religious conflicts, to say nothing of the issues related to climate, environment, illegal migration, epi- demics, trans-border crime, etc. As to the dependence of Russia’s security on nuclear weapons, this concept also seems to be rather superficial in practice. It should be remembered that by the time the Warsaw Treaty Organization and the Soviet Union collapsed, Mos- cow had 5 to 7 times more nuclear weapons than today’s Russia. One has to have no faith at all in the Russian people to regard nuclear weapons (most of which are a Soviet legacy) as the sole attribute of Russia as a great power. This would imply an assumption that Russia is non-competitive either in terms of economy, re- search and development innovations, or in terms of improving the citizens’ well- being and political life, as well as in terms of advanced general-purpose forces and conventional arms. In the changing politico-military environment, the perception of strategic stability has significantly expanded as compared to the Cold War era in view of new threats and destabilizing factors. The essence of today’s and future strategic stability requires major adjustment. The contributors to the project have devel- oped and discussed in this book a whole set of pertinent suggestions. 8 PREFACE The signing of a new START Treaty has become an important milestone on the way towards further arms reductions and limitations. This is obviously an im- portant event both in terms of unprecedentedly low levels set forth for the strate- gic weapons of the parties and in terms of the two powers’ resuming the legal co- operation in this area that was suspended for more than a decade. The recent history vividly demonstrates that the processes related to nego- tiations and agreements on nuclear disarmament between Russia and the US should be continuous and consistent. Deadlocks and standstills in the negotiations inevitably lead to the loss of mutual understanding
Recommended publications
  • Stanislav Nikolaevich Rodionov (–)

    Stanislav Nikolaevich Rodionov (–)

    SCIENCE & GLOBAL SECURITY ,VOL.,NO.,– http://dx.doi.org/./.. Memoriam: Stanislav Nikolaevich Rodionov (–) Oleg Prilutsky and Frank von Hippel Stanislav Rodionov was a member of the first post-World War II generation of Soviet physicists. He began his scientific career in 1953 in what is now known as the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute” where he carried out an exper- iment in which, for the first time in the Soviet Union, he captured electrons from tritium decay in a magnetic mirror adiabatic trap. From 1958 to 1973, he worked in the Nuclear Physics Institute of the Siberian Division of USSR Academy of Sciences in Akademgorodok near Novosibirsk. Dur- ing the 1960s, while Rodionov was there, this institute, directed by Academician Budker, built one of the first electron-positron colliders in the world (VEPP-2). Rodionov played a very important scientific-organizational role as the Secretary of the institute’s Scientific Council—its “Round Table.” In 1974, Rodionov returned to Moscow to join the staff of the Soviet Academy of Sciences’ Space Research Institute (IKI) directed by Roald Sagdeev. There he partici- pated in the organization of international collaborations in space research programs, which was a pioneering contribution to opening up Soviet science to the world. Rodionov also supported Sagdeev in doing arms-control research under the aus- pices of the Committee of Soviet Scientists for Peace and Against the Nuclear Threat. This Committee was established during a 17–19 May 1983 All-Union conference of scientists within the Soviet Academy called in response to President Reagan’s 23 MarchspeechaskingAmericanscientiststojoininaStrategicDefenseInitiative to make nuclear-armed ballistic missiles “impotent and obsolete.” Evgeny Velikhov was the first chairman with Sagdeev, Sergei Kapitza and Andrei Kokoshin as his Vice Chairmen.
  • Annual Report 2018

    Annual Report 2018

    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 CONTRIBUTION TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF GLOBAL ENERGY Contents 1 ASSOCIATION 2 THE GLOBAL ENERGY PRIZE 4 Key Indicators 44 About the Award 11 Address by the President of the Association 48 The International Award Committee 14 Key Events of 2018 52 Nomination Process 24 History of the Association 53 Nomination Cycle 26 Association Members 54 Nominating Persons 27 Organizational Structure 54 Independent International Experts Pool 29 Mission and Values 55 National Award Support Committees 30 Development Strategy 56 2018 Nomination Cycle Results 35 International Cooperation 57 Award Laureates 40 Financial Results 64 Award Development 65 Position in the Industry 3 PROGRAMS OF THE ASSOCIATION 4 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 68 Programs and Contests of the Association. 80 Corporate Governance Development Plans 89 Internal Control and Audit 70 The Energy of Youth Contest 90 Implementation of IT-solutions 72 The Energy of Breakthrough Contest 91 HR Policy 74 The Energy of Thought Scientific Symposium 93 Interaction with Stakeholders 75 The Energy of Knowledge Program 96 Work with Award Laureates and Program Winners 76 The Energy of Education Program 77 The Energy of Inspiration Award 77 The Energy of Words International Media Contest 118 GLOSSARY 119 DISCLAIMER 119 CONTACT DETAILS 120 ANNEXES 120 1. About the Report 121 2. GRI Content Index 126 3. Financial Statements for 2018 130 4. Conclusion on the Results of the Audit of the Association Activities 132 5. Feedback Form TRANSFORMATION ASSOCIATION FOR FUTURE GROWTH 1 OUR ASSOCIATION HELPS TO SHAPE THE ENERGY OF THE FUTURE BY SUPPORTING ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS AND STIMULATING 3 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY COOPERATION IN THE INTERESTS CORE ACTIVITIES OF ALL HUMANKIND.
  • The True History of the U.S. Fusion Program —And Who Tried to Kill It

    The True History of the U.S. Fusion Program —And Who Tried to Kill It

    PPPL Inside the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, while it was in con- struction. The TFTR set world records for plasma temperature and fusion power produced in the late 1980s and early 1990s. But budget cuts closed it down before all its planned experiments were completed. The True History of The U.S. Fusion Program An inside analysis of how the U.S. fusion program was —And Who euthanized, dispels the myth that “fusion can’t work.“ Tried To Kill It by Marsha Freeman here is no disputing that the world is facing an energy been visible on the horizon for years, but seemingly never crisis of vast proportions. But this could have been avoid- close at hand. Why? Ted. For more than five decades, scientists, engineers, en- Legend has it that there are more problems in attaining con- ergy planners, policy-makers, and, at times, even the public at trolled nuclear fusion than scientists anticipated, and that little large, have known what the ultimate alternative is to our finite progress has been made. “Fusion is still 50 years away, and energy resources—nuclear fusion. This energy, which powers always has been” has become the common refrain of skeptics. the Sun and all of the stars, and can use a virtually unlimited But the reason that we do not have commercially available supply of isotopes of hydrogen, available from seawater, has fusion energy is not what is commonly believed. 21st Century Science & Technology Winter 2009/2010 15 In 1976, the Energy Research and Development Administra- tion, or ERDA—the predecessor to the Department of Energy—pub- lished a chart showing various policy and funding options for the magnetic fusion energy research program.
  • Arms Control, Disarmament and International Security

    Arms Control, Disarmament and International Security

    RUSSIA: ARMS CONTROL, DISARMAMENT AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY IMEMO CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE RUSSIAN EDITION OF THE SIPRI YEARBOOK 2004 Institute of World Economy and International Relations RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF WORLD ECONOMY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (IMEMO) RUSSIA: ARMS CONTROL, DISARMAMENT AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY IMEMO SUPPLEMENT TO THE RUSSIAN EDITION OF THE SIPRI YEARBOOK 2004 Compiled and edited by ALEXANDRE KALIADINE AND ALEXEI ARBATOV Moscow 2005 УДК 327 ББК 64.4 (0) Rus 95 Rus 95 Russia: arms control, disarmament and international security/ IMEMO supplement to the Russian edition of the SIPRI Yearbook 2004 / Compiled and edited by A. Kaliadine, A. Arbatov. IMEMO, 2005. – 128 p. ISBN 5-9535-0038-6 Your comments and requests for obtaining the book should be sent to: IMEMO 23, Profsoyuznaya str., Moscow GSP-7, 117997 Russian Federation Telephone: (+7 095) 128 05 13 Telefax: (+7 095) 128 65 75 E-mail: [email protected] Internet URL:: http://www.imemo.ru ISBN 5-9535-0038-6 © ИМЭМО РАН, 2005 CONTENTS PREFACE........................................................................................... 5 ACRONYMS ...................................................................................... 7 PART I. ANALYSES, FORECASTS, DISCUSSIONS 1. PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS: NEW THREATS, NEW SO LUTIONS. Alexei ARBATOV ................ 13 Nuclear deterrence and terrorism: the prospect of terrorists coming into possession of nuclear weapons....................................................... 14 Synergy of proliferation
  • Adobe PDF File

    Adobe PDF File

    BOOK REVIEWS David B. Quinn. European Approaches to North analyse social and demographic trends and so America, 1450-1640. Variorum Collected Studies; have been unfashionable for more than a decade" Aldershot and Brookfield, VT: Variorum Press, (221). It is, however, useful for historians and 1998. x + 342 pp., illustrations, maps, charts, others interested in the past to know what hap• index. US $101.95, cloth; ISBN 0-86078-769-9. pened, or at least what is likely to have happened. Quinn may be no exponent of the latest Paris fad This most recent collection of David Quinn's but he remains a scholar whose interpretation of essays on the early European exploration and events inevitably commands respect, precisely settlement of North America follows his Explor• because he is always more interested in making ers and Colonies: America, 1500-1625 (London, sense of the document than in validating a theo• 1990). Like its useful predecessor, European retical preconception. Approaches brings together Quinn's contributions What of the longer essays in this volume, in to several disparate publications. Although most which Quinn cautiously dons the unfamiliar of the essays in the present volume have appeared analytic robe? "Englishmen and Others" is a blunt in scholarly journals or conference proceedings and therefore interesting assessment of how since the late 1980s, that previous exposure does Quinn's compatriots viewed themselves and other not detract from the usefulness of this book. The Europeans on the eve of colonization. The final topics range from imagined Atlantic islands, to essay, "Settlement Patterns in Early Modern perceptions of American ecology, the French fur Colonization," is an analysis of the state of early trade, the settlement of Bermuda, editing Hakluyt, European colonization by 1700.
  • John A. Shanahan, Corresponding Author January 11, 2010 Dr. John P. Holdren Director, Office of Science & Technology Policy

    John A. Shanahan, Corresponding Author January 11, 2010 Dr. John P. Holdren Director, Office of Science & Technology Policy

    John A. Shanahan, Corresponding Author January 11, 2010 Dr. John P. Holdren Director, Office of Science & Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President Washington, D.C. Dear John, We met in Palo Alto, California in 1970, while you were working on your doctorate at Stanford University and I was starting an engineering career in nuclear power. You visited my family in Switzerland in the 1980s, where I was working on Nuclear Power Plant Leibstadt. You have also answered questions over the years on applications of Einstein‘s equations that is much appreciated. Nearly 40 years have passed. We are both still working to make genuine contributions through science and engineering for the lasting benefit of society and the planet. Please hear our statement and pass it on to the President. Peace on earth and preservation of the marvels of nature will not be achieved without a sound energy policy. This policy must include well-managed and well-governed slow- and fast-neutron nuclear power, recycling spent fuels and depleted uranium and possibly thorium. This was the goal of the founding scientists in the 1940s and still is the best way to a reliable and secure energy future. But the world is leaving us behind. At present, 58 new nuclear plants (including two fast reactors, one in Russia and one in India) are under construction in 14 countries. Of these, 20 are in China, 9 in Russia, 6 each in India and South Korea. Only one is in North America, and that is resumed work on a plant that was mothballed in 1988 when it was 80% finished.
  • Causes of the First World War Lesson 4 the Arms Race

    Causes of the First World War Lesson 4 the Arms Race

    Lesson 4 The Arms Race CAUSES OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR LESSON 4 THE ARMS RACE Objectives/learning outcomes Starter Pupils will:- Discuss with pupils why countries need weapons. What are the threats today? What Know what the term ‘arms race’ were the threats in 1914? means and why this increased the How much does Britain spend on defence? tension between the major powers. Show diagram. Understand why the building of the Get pupils to understand the amount in dreadnought led to a naval arms comparison to other government spending. race. Defence: £44bn Education: £42bn Transport: Evaluate through sources whether £15bn. Germany wanted a war in 1914. Explain Militarism: building up armed forces; getting ready for war. Can this be applied to some countries today? Why did this happen up to 1914? Activities and homework Plenary Give pupils the following words/phrases:- Activity 1 The Arms Race Fear Activity 2 Jealousy The Dreadnought and the Naval Arms Naval Superiority Race Empire building [A linked cause] Activity 3 Worsening relations Did Germany want a war in 1914? More money spent on armaments Ask them to start with one word/phrase and Homework answer orally the question, ‘How did the arms Homework 1 Cartoon Analysis race help cause the First World War?’ [Advanced] Homework 1 Admiral Von Tirpitz They can use any of the other words/phrases [Standard] to answer the question. Causes of the First World War History Interactive© 1 Lesson 4 The Arms Race STARTER ACTIVITY Britain’s Defence Spending 2009 Equipment • £6.1bn Pay • £5.6bn • £2.6bn Wars Afghanistan • £2bn Iraq War pensions • £1bn Weapons • 27bn About £45 billion Causes of the First World War History Interactive© 2 Lesson 4 The Arms Race ACTIVITY 1 THE ARMS RACE How did the Arms Race add to the tensions between the major powers? ARMS RACE This was competition between countries to build up their military strength.
  • Canada Bulletin of (He National Fusion Proyrnm Issuu 28, Juin; 1

    Canada Bulletin of (He National Fusion Proyrnm Issuu 28, Juin; 1

    r CÀ9600782 Canada Bulletin of (he National Fusion Proyrnm Issuu 28, Juin; 1 ¥M> h t h| i s Issue Canada-US Collaboration Review Fast electrons in tokamaks: New data from TdeV CFFTP: New Manager and New Rôle y INIS-mf — 14893 CCFM: Program review Canada-Chile Fusion Work Velikhov to address Montréal fusion ISSN 0835-488X News Notes meeting INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL Canada-US fusion meeting in Montréal: Fusion Breeder Work 'Joint CNS/FPA Fusion Symposium' in Chile Montréal, Canada, September 6-8,1995 Canadian experts assist Chilean fusion breeder researchers Evgeny Velikhov (ITER) to give keynote address Chilean researchers have a long- N. Anne Davies (USDOE) to review US Fusion Program term goal of manufacturing lithium ceramic tritium breeder materials The program for the Joint • ITER (JCT and Home Teams for fusion power reactors. CNS/FPA Fusion Symposium in work). Researchers at Chile's La Reina Montréal, September 6-8, has nuclear research site near Santiago been finalized. The Canadian • Tritium work (Canada, US, have been developing their lithium Nuclear Society (CNS) and the TFTR). ceramics fusion breeder program USA's Fusion Power Associates for several years. A tritium mea- (FPA) are jointly presenting the • Spherical tokamaks and TPX. surement laboratory is being Symposium. established at La Reina for this Other presentation topics work. Dr. Evgeny Velikhov, Chair of the include: compact toroid fuelling, ITER Council, will deliver the inertia) confinement (NIF), educa- Canada-Chile cooperation in fusion keynote address. tional activities and plasma-aided breeders began in 1993, and is manufacturing. centred on the eventual manufac- Dr. N.
  • Television and Politics in the Soviet Union by Ellen Mickiewicz TELEVISION and AMERICA's CHILDREN a Crisis of Neglect by Edward L

    Television and Politics in the Soviet Union by Ellen Mickiewicz TELEVISION and AMERICA's CHILDREN a Crisis of Neglect by Edward L

    SPLIT SIGNALS COMMUNICATION AND SOCIETY edited by George Gerbner and Marsha Seifert IMAGE ETHICS The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Film, and Television Edited by Larry Gross, John Stuart Katz, and Jay Ruby CENSORSHIP The Knot That Binds Power and Knowledge By Sue Curry Jansen SPLIT SIGNALS Television and Politics in the Soviet Union By Ellen Mickiewicz TELEVISION AND AMERICA'S CHILDREN A Crisis of Neglect By Edward L. Palmer SPLIT SIGNALS Television and Politics in the Soviet Union ELLEN MICKIEWICZ New York Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1988 Oxford University Press Oxford New York Toronto Delhi Bombay Calcutta Madras Karachi Petaling Jaya Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo Nairobi Dar es Salaam Cape Town Melbourne Auckland and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Copyright © 1988 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc., 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission of Oxford University Press. Mickiewicz, Ellen Propper. Split signals : television and politics in the Soviet Union / Ellen Mickiewicz. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0-19-505463-6 1. Television broadcasting of news—Soviet Union. 2. Television broadcasting—Social aspects—Soviet Union. 3. Television broadcasting—Political aspects—Soviet Union. 4. Soviet Union— Politics and government—1982- I. Title. PN5277.T4M53 1988 302.2'345'0947—dc!9 88-4200 CIP 1098 7654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Preface In television terminology, broadcast signals are split when they are divided and sent to two or more locations simultaneously.
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    BINDEX 06/25/2018 18:16:29 Page 379 INDEX ‘Ndrangheta, 261 Ambedkar, B. R., 115, 150, 238, 273, 1848 revolutions, 306 282, 311 1955 System, 137 American Civil War, 94 9/11, 178, 269, 273, 301, 302 American Constitution, 109, 318 Amin al-Husseini, Haj, 100 Aam Aadmi Party, 311 Amin, Idi, 127, 255 Abdullah of Jordan, King, 120 Amritsar Massacre (1919), 30, 48 Abe, Shinzo, 317 anarchism, 5, 10, 44, 61, 159, 219, 306 Aborigines, 38, 74, 265, 272, 275 Andaman Islands, 267 Abyssinia, 97, 250, 265 Anglo-Boer War, 16, 31, 39 Action Française, 59, 67, 81, 109, 225 Anglo-Egyptian Treaty (1936), 55 Adenauer, Konrad, 109, 132, 244 Anglo-Hindu law, 278 Advani, L. K., 171 Anglo-Iraq treaties; (1926), (1932) African National Congress, 142, 155, Anglo-Muhammadan law, 278 156, 176, 281, 312 Anglo-Russian Entente (1907), 22 Afrikaners, 31, 73, 127, 155, 279 animals in war, 210, 295 agricultural reforms, 54, 63, 75, 84, 85, Antarctica, 15 94, 119, 124, 127, 129, 134, 135, 146, Anthropocene, 214, 287, 295, 296 151, 153, 185, 232, 284, 291, 297, 307, Anthropology, 8, 179, 183, 186–189, 309, 316 192, 232, 234, 296 Ahmadiyya, 168, 234 anti-fascist resistance, 133 AIDS, 204, 205, 288, 289, 312, 323 Anti-French War, 123 Alawites, 22, 280 anti-hunting protests, 210, 295 Alexander I of Yugoslavia, King, 62 anti-Nazi resistance, 65 Alger Hiss case, 110 anti-Semitism, 16, 60, 66, 81, 100, 103, Algerian War of Independence,COPYRIGHTED 185 197, 243, 251,MATERIAL 256, 299, 308 Algérie Française, 156 Anti-US War, 123 Ali, Mehmet, 239, 240 anti-Vietnam War protests, 143, 200 Ali, Muhammad, 210 Antonius, George, 22, 28 Aligarh Muslim University, 207 Apartheid, 90, 127, 135, 156, 163, 174, Allahabad, 111, 276 176, 210, 255, 268, 279, 285, 296, 311, Allende, Salvador, 159 312 Allied Powers (First World War), 13, 96 Appadurai, Arjun, 6, 299 Remaking the Modern World 1900–2015: Global Connections and Comparisons, First Edition.
  • 2010 History Standard Grade − Credit Finalised Marking

    2010 History Standard Grade − Credit Finalised Marking

    © 2010 History Standard Grade − Credit Finalised Marking Instructions © Scottish Qualifications Authority 2010 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only on a non- commercial basis. If it is to be used for any other purposes written permission must be obtained from the External Print Team, Centre Services, Dalkeith. Where the publication includes materials from sources other than SQA (secondary copyright), this material should only be reproduced for the purposes of examination or assessment. If it needs to be reproduced for any other purpose it is the centre’s responsibility to obtain the necessary copyright clearance. SQA’s External Print Team, Centre Services, at Dalkeith may be able to direct you to the secondary sources. These Marking Instructions have been prepared by Examination Teams for use by SQA Appointed Markers when marking External Course Assessments. This publication must not be reproduced for commercial or trade purposes. Information for markers The following general instructions are provided for the guidance of markers at all levels. It is vitally important that all markers are totally familiar with the candidate performance requirements, as set out in the correct arrangements document, for both assessable elements at each level in terms of: process; the place of recalled evidence where this is required. Marking conventions Markers must carefully observe the following points: All marking on candidate scripts must be in red biro. All marking must be carefully placed in the correct column on the right of the script: KU marks in the left column; ES marks in the right column. Half marks must not be used.
  • Meeting the Enemy British-German Encounters in the Occupied Rhineland After the First World War

    Meeting the Enemy British-German Encounters in the Occupied Rhineland After the First World War

    Angles New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10 | 2020 Creating the Enemy Meeting the Enemy British-German Encounters in the Occupied Rhineland after the First World War Tom Williams Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/angles/488 DOI: 10.4000/angles.488 ISSN: 2274-2042 Publisher Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur Electronic reference Tom Williams, « Meeting the Enemy », Angles [Online], 10 | 2020, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 28 July 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/angles/488 ; DOI : https://doi.org/ 10.4000/angles.488 This text was automatically generated on 28 July 2020. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Meeting the Enemy 1 Meeting the Enemy British-German Encounters in the Occupied Rhineland after the First World War Tom Williams 1 Negative stereotypes of the German enemy were so pervasive in Britain during the First World War that, when crossing into German territory at the end of the conflict, the writer and social reformer Violet Markham remarked that it was “almost with a shock that you realise that German civilians are not equipped with hoofs and horns or other attributes of a Satanic character” (Markham 1921: 15). Visions of a brutal, arrogant, warmongering “Hun”, disseminated since 1914 in British propaganda as a means of justifying wartime mobilization and sacrifice, proved difficult to sustain once British soldiers and civilians met individual Germans face-to-face in the occupied Rhineland. However effective they may be as a propaganda tool for galvanising public opinion in wartime, enemy images inevitably require a process of psychological abstraction, relying on a set of beliefs and assumptions that often bear little relation to socio- historical realities or individual experiences (Rieber & Kelly 1991; Oppenheimer 2006).