DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 CONTRIBUTION TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF GLOBAL ENERGY Contents 1 ASSOCIATION 2 THE GLOBAL ENERGY PRIZE 4 Key Indicators 44 About the Award 11 Address by the President of the Association 48 The International Award Committee 14 Key Events of 2018 52 Nomination Process 24 History of the Association 53 Nomination Cycle 26 Association Members 54 Nominating Persons 27 Organizational Structure 54 Independent International Experts Pool 29 Mission and Values 55 National Award Support Committees 30 Development Strategy 56 2018 Nomination Cycle Results 35 International Cooperation 57 Award Laureates 40 Financial Results 64 Award Development 65 Position in the Industry 3 PROGRAMS OF THE ASSOCIATION 4 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 68 Programs and Contests of the Association. 80 Corporate Governance Development Plans 89 Internal Control and Audit 70 The Energy of Youth Contest 90 Implementation of IT-solutions 72 The Energy of Breakthrough Contest 91 HR Policy 74 The Energy of Thought Scientific Symposium 93 Interaction with Stakeholders 75 The Energy of Knowledge Program 96 Work with Award Laureates and Program Winners 76 The Energy of Education Program 77 The Energy of Inspiration Award 77 The Energy of Words International Media Contest 118 GLOSSARY 119 DISCLAIMER 119 CONTACT DETAILS 120 ANNEXES 120 1. About the Report 121 2. GRI Content Index 126 3. Financial Statements for 2018 130 4. Conclusion on the Results of the Audit of the Association Activities 132 5. Feedback Form TRANSFORMATION ASSOCIATION FOR FUTURE GROWTH 1 OUR ASSOCIATION HELPS TO SHAPE THE ENERGY OF THE FUTURE BY SUPPORTING ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS AND STIMULATING 3 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY COOPERATION IN THE INTERESTS CORE ACTIVITIES OF ALL HUMANKIND. WE FAVOR THE TECHNOLOGIES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF WORLD ENERGY, ENSURING THE SAFETY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ACHIEVEMENT OF GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS. 4 5 1 ASSOCIATION Key Indicators 2018 ANNUAL REPORT KEY INDICATORS NOMINATING PERSONS PEOPLE FROM The Global Energy Prize – NOMINEES GEOGRAPHY OF NOMINATING PERSONS 60 11 COUNTRIES XVI AWARD CYCLE PEOPLE FROM 14 COUNTRIES Experts who nominated scientists 44 for the prize GEOGRAPHY OF NOMINEES Scientists nominated for the prize (2017–2018) 85% 5% 8% 57% 27% 14% 2% DISTRIBUTION OF NOMINEES BY COUNTRY DISTRIBUTION OF NOMINATING PERSONS BY COUNTRY CONTINENT/COUNTRY QUANTITY 2% CONTINENT/COUNTRY QUANTITY Europe 25 Europe 50 Russia 16 Russia 32 Italy 1 Italy 13 United Kingdom 3 United Kingdom 2 Finland 1 The Netherlands 1 Switzerland 1 Portugal 1 Germany 1 Germany 1 Lithuania 1 Spain 1 North America 5 North America 12 USA 5 USA 12 Asia 4 Asia 6 China 2 Japan 2 Kazakhstan 2 China 1 Japan 1 Bangladesh 1 Bangladesh 1 EUROPE 57% Australia and Oceania 1 EUROPE 85% Australia and Oceania 1 NORTH AMERICA 27% Australia 1 NORTH AMERICA 5% Australia 1 ASIA 14% ASIA 8% TOTAL 60 TOTAL 44 AUSTRALIA AND OCEANIA 2% AUSTRALIA AND OCEANIA 2% 6 7 1 ASSOCIATION Key Indicators 2018 ANNUAL REPORT KEY AREAS OF RESEARCH FOCUS The Global Energy Association Contests THE ENERGY OF YOUTH ALL-RUSSIAN CONTEST OF YOUTH SCIENTIFIC Share 34% 15 RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS IN THE FIELD OF ENERGY Quantity 2018 results 16% 7 EXPLORATION, PRODUCTION, TOTAL WINNERS: COVERAGE: TRANSPORTATION, AND PROCESSING APPLICATIONS: 91 3 36 OF FUEL AND ENERGY RESOURCES 80% of applications were submitted for expert assessment regions of Russia 14% 6 NUCLEAR ENERGY 9% 4 EFFICIENT USE OF ENERGY 7% 3 ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY 7% 3 NEW MATERIALS USED IN POWER INDUSTRY 7% 3 FUEL ELEMENTS AND HYDROGEN ENERGY The most popular areas • Moscow; • Republic of Dagestan; • St. Petersburg; • Republic of Sakha (Yakutia); of the contest: • Arkhangelsk Oblast; • Republic of Tatarstan; • Belgorod Oblast; • Ryazan Oblast; EXPLORATION, PRODUCTION, BIOENERGY • Vologda Oblast; • Samara Oblast; 3% 1 TRANSPORTATION, • Voronezh Oblast; • Saratov Oblast; AND PROCESSING OF FUEL • Ivanovo Oblast; • Sakhalin Oblast; AND ENERGY RESOURCES • Irkutsk Oblast; • Sverdlovsk Oblast; • Kaluga Oblast; • Stavropol Krai; ELECTRIC ENERGY • Kirov Oblast; • Tver Oblast; 3% HEAT POWER INDUSTRY • Leningrad Oblast; • Tomsk Oblast; 1 RENEWABLE ENERGY • Lipetsk Oblast; • Tyumen Oblast; • Moscow Oblast; • Udmurt Republic; HEAT POWER INDUSTRY • Nizhny Novgorod Oblast; • Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug – Ugra; • Novosibirsk Oblast; • Chelyabinsk Oblast; • Orenburg Oblast; • Chukotka Autonomous Okrug; THE AVERAGE SCORE • Penza Oblast; • Yaroslavl Oblast. OF SHORTLIST NOMINEES • Perm Krai; 4,1 of 5 • Republic of Bashkortostan; 8 9 1 ASSOCIATION Key Indicators 2018 ANNUAL REPORT In 2018, the majority of applications the ‘New Technologies and Materials’ Among the participants, there are Scientific degrees Positions (status) Project actualization stages for the contest (over 60%) came nomination, including those related top managers in both business and from universities, 25% – from to the improvement of satellites. science – they make over 2% of the business structures and NCOs, and participants of the contest. One-third of the participants are 14% – from research institutes. candidates of sciences (technical, More than half of the projects of chemical and economic). The vast young scientists were included in the majority of participants of the ‘Traditional Energy’ nomination. 12% contest (almost 80%) are ordinary of applications were submitted within specialists, researchers and engineers. Organizations coverage Contest nominations Areas 1% 2% 68% Professor Directors Research results are available 4% 12% 20% Doctor of Technical Sciences Heads of departments Startup 29% 79% 12% Candidate of Technical Sciences Specialists At the implementation stage 6% 7% Candidate of Chemical Sciences Students 1% Candidate of Economic Sciences 61% (39) 55% 22% HIGHER EDUCATIONAL TRADITIONAL ENERGY Exploration, Production, Transportation, and Processing of Fuel and Energy Resources 2% INSTITUTIONS (gas, coal, oil, heat and electric Postgraduate power) 25% (16) 19% Electric Energy 57% Location BUSINESS/NCOS 33% No degree NONCONVENTIONAL ENERGY 16% 14% (9) (RES, nuclear energy, hydrogen energy, Renewable Energy SRI bioenergy) 48% 14% Higher educational institutions staff 12% Heat Energy NEW TECHNOLOGIES 34% (new types of technologies/materials for 14% Research institutes staff energy production, space technologies) Efficient Use of Energy 11% 8% Employees of organizations (business) New Materials Used in Energy 4% 4% Managers Fuel Elements and Hydrogen Energy 3% 2% Other Nuclear Energy 1% Bioenergy 10 11 1 ASSOCIATION Key Indicators 2018 ANNUAL REPORT THE ENERGY OF BREAKTHROUGH ALL-RUSSIAN CONTEST OF IMPLEMENTED ADDRESS BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION INNOVATIVE PROJECTS IN THE FIELD OF ENERGY 2018 results TOTAL WINNERS: COVERAGE: Dear friends, partners, and colleagues! APPLICATIONS: 39 1 19 The past year was for us the year of the beginning of transformation, designing a long-term development regions of Russia strategy for the Global Energy Association and transiting to a new quality level – raising the ‘global’ component of the Global Energy Prize and the association that was created to contribute to the development of both Russian and global energy, and support for the enhancement of technology and scientific breakthroughs of our laureates. It is difficult to overestimate the importance of the practical use of technologies and the applied role of laureates’ developments in clean, efficient and affordable technologies in both traditional and renewable energy, bioenergy, fuel cells, and hydrogen energy. Savings and value added from the developments based on discoveries and technologies, which became possible due to the scientific achievements of our laureates, already amount to tens of billions of dollars and are being actively implemented worldwide. Our goal is to promote scientific activities in the energy sector, supporting the «Our association has a direct and indirect industry entering a new technological cycle, which sets an Top-3 areas: impact on the development of international important task of improving the quality of life. Moreover, EFFICIENT USE OF ENERGY • Moscow; St. Petersburg; energy projects through scientific it is science that is called upon to become a locomotive • Irkutsk Oblast; for modern and sought-after education and innovative ELECTRIC ENERGY • Kemerovo Oblast; cooperation, which has no boundaries». production sites involved in the energy sector. • Kirov Oblast; HEAT ENERGY • Primorskiy Krai; The Global Energy Prize remains a vital component of • Republic of Bashkortostan; the association’s activity. It not only emphasizes the The Efficient Use of Energy became We can see the tendency of a large • Republic of Dagestan; Alexander Ignatov • Republic of Sakha (Yakutia); importance of energy in Russia but also contributes to the the most popular area of the contest number of applications submitted Acting president • Republic of Tatarstan; achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals in 2018, which corresponds to by young professionals representing of the Global Energy Association • Samara Oblast; 2030. As of today, we are influencing directly or indirectly global energy trends (the efficient the operating production enterprises • Sakhalin Oblast; 5 of the 17 global goals, aimed at improving the quality use and storage of energy is one of the fuel and energy complex. It • Sverdlovsk Oblast; of the key trends today). Young is the combination of scientific and • Tomsk Oblast; and standard of living of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stanislav Nikolaevich Rodionov (–)
    SCIENCE & GLOBAL SECURITY ,VOL.,NO.,– http://dx.doi.org/./.. Memoriam: Stanislav Nikolaevich Rodionov (–) Oleg Prilutsky and Frank von Hippel Stanislav Rodionov was a member of the first post-World War II generation of Soviet physicists. He began his scientific career in 1953 in what is now known as the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute” where he carried out an exper- iment in which, for the first time in the Soviet Union, he captured electrons from tritium decay in a magnetic mirror adiabatic trap. From 1958 to 1973, he worked in the Nuclear Physics Institute of the Siberian Division of USSR Academy of Sciences in Akademgorodok near Novosibirsk. Dur- ing the 1960s, while Rodionov was there, this institute, directed by Academician Budker, built one of the first electron-positron colliders in the world (VEPP-2). Rodionov played a very important scientific-organizational role as the Secretary of the institute’s Scientific Council—its “Round Table.” In 1974, Rodionov returned to Moscow to join the staff of the Soviet Academy of Sciences’ Space Research Institute (IKI) directed by Roald Sagdeev. There he partici- pated in the organization of international collaborations in space research programs, which was a pioneering contribution to opening up Soviet science to the world. Rodionov also supported Sagdeev in doing arms-control research under the aus- pices of the Committee of Soviet Scientists for Peace and Against the Nuclear Threat. This Committee was established during a 17–19 May 1983 All-Union conference of scientists within the Soviet Academy called in response to President Reagan’s 23 MarchspeechaskingAmericanscientiststojoininaStrategicDefenseInitiative to make nuclear-armed ballistic missiles “impotent and obsolete.” Evgeny Velikhov was the first chairman with Sagdeev, Sergei Kapitza and Andrei Kokoshin as his Vice Chairmen.
    [Show full text]
  • The True History of the U.S. Fusion Program —And Who Tried to Kill It
    PPPL Inside the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, while it was in con- struction. The TFTR set world records for plasma temperature and fusion power produced in the late 1980s and early 1990s. But budget cuts closed it down before all its planned experiments were completed. The True History of The U.S. Fusion Program An inside analysis of how the U.S. fusion program was —And Who euthanized, dispels the myth that “fusion can’t work.“ Tried To Kill It by Marsha Freeman here is no disputing that the world is facing an energy been visible on the horizon for years, but seemingly never crisis of vast proportions. But this could have been avoid- close at hand. Why? Ted. For more than five decades, scientists, engineers, en- Legend has it that there are more problems in attaining con- ergy planners, policy-makers, and, at times, even the public at trolled nuclear fusion than scientists anticipated, and that little large, have known what the ultimate alternative is to our finite progress has been made. “Fusion is still 50 years away, and energy resources—nuclear fusion. This energy, which powers always has been” has become the common refrain of skeptics. the Sun and all of the stars, and can use a virtually unlimited But the reason that we do not have commercially available supply of isotopes of hydrogen, available from seawater, has fusion energy is not what is commonly believed. 21st Century Science & Technology Winter 2009/2010 15 In 1976, the Energy Research and Development Administra- tion, or ERDA—the predecessor to the Department of Energy—pub- lished a chart showing various policy and funding options for the magnetic fusion energy research program.
    [Show full text]
  • John A. Shanahan, Corresponding Author January 11, 2010 Dr. John P. Holdren Director, Office of Science & Technology Policy
    John A. Shanahan, Corresponding Author January 11, 2010 Dr. John P. Holdren Director, Office of Science & Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President Washington, D.C. Dear John, We met in Palo Alto, California in 1970, while you were working on your doctorate at Stanford University and I was starting an engineering career in nuclear power. You visited my family in Switzerland in the 1980s, where I was working on Nuclear Power Plant Leibstadt. You have also answered questions over the years on applications of Einstein‘s equations that is much appreciated. Nearly 40 years have passed. We are both still working to make genuine contributions through science and engineering for the lasting benefit of society and the planet. Please hear our statement and pass it on to the President. Peace on earth and preservation of the marvels of nature will not be achieved without a sound energy policy. This policy must include well-managed and well-governed slow- and fast-neutron nuclear power, recycling spent fuels and depleted uranium and possibly thorium. This was the goal of the founding scientists in the 1940s and still is the best way to a reliable and secure energy future. But the world is leaving us behind. At present, 58 new nuclear plants (including two fast reactors, one in Russia and one in India) are under construction in 14 countries. Of these, 20 are in China, 9 in Russia, 6 each in India and South Korea. Only one is in North America, and that is resumed work on a plant that was mothballed in 1988 when it was 80% finished.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Bulletin of (He National Fusion Proyrnm Issuu 28, Juin; 1
    r CÀ9600782 Canada Bulletin of (he National Fusion Proyrnm Issuu 28, Juin; 1 ¥M> h t h| i s Issue Canada-US Collaboration Review Fast electrons in tokamaks: New data from TdeV CFFTP: New Manager and New Rôle y INIS-mf — 14893 CCFM: Program review Canada-Chile Fusion Work Velikhov to address Montréal fusion ISSN 0835-488X News Notes meeting INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL Canada-US fusion meeting in Montréal: Fusion Breeder Work 'Joint CNS/FPA Fusion Symposium' in Chile Montréal, Canada, September 6-8,1995 Canadian experts assist Chilean fusion breeder researchers Evgeny Velikhov (ITER) to give keynote address Chilean researchers have a long- N. Anne Davies (USDOE) to review US Fusion Program term goal of manufacturing lithium ceramic tritium breeder materials The program for the Joint • ITER (JCT and Home Teams for fusion power reactors. CNS/FPA Fusion Symposium in work). Researchers at Chile's La Reina Montréal, September 6-8, has nuclear research site near Santiago been finalized. The Canadian • Tritium work (Canada, US, have been developing their lithium Nuclear Society (CNS) and the TFTR). ceramics fusion breeder program USA's Fusion Power Associates for several years. A tritium mea- (FPA) are jointly presenting the • Spherical tokamaks and TPX. surement laboratory is being Symposium. established at La Reina for this Other presentation topics work. Dr. Evgeny Velikhov, Chair of the include: compact toroid fuelling, ITER Council, will deliver the inertia) confinement (NIF), educa- Canada-Chile cooperation in fusion keynote address. tional activities and plasma-aided breeders began in 1993, and is manufacturing. centred on the eventual manufac- Dr. N.
    [Show full text]
  • Television and Politics in the Soviet Union by Ellen Mickiewicz TELEVISION and AMERICA's CHILDREN a Crisis of Neglect by Edward L
    SPLIT SIGNALS COMMUNICATION AND SOCIETY edited by George Gerbner and Marsha Seifert IMAGE ETHICS The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Film, and Television Edited by Larry Gross, John Stuart Katz, and Jay Ruby CENSORSHIP The Knot That Binds Power and Knowledge By Sue Curry Jansen SPLIT SIGNALS Television and Politics in the Soviet Union By Ellen Mickiewicz TELEVISION AND AMERICA'S CHILDREN A Crisis of Neglect By Edward L. Palmer SPLIT SIGNALS Television and Politics in the Soviet Union ELLEN MICKIEWICZ New York Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1988 Oxford University Press Oxford New York Toronto Delhi Bombay Calcutta Madras Karachi Petaling Jaya Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo Nairobi Dar es Salaam Cape Town Melbourne Auckland and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Copyright © 1988 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc., 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission of Oxford University Press. Mickiewicz, Ellen Propper. Split signals : television and politics in the Soviet Union / Ellen Mickiewicz. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0-19-505463-6 1. Television broadcasting of news—Soviet Union. 2. Television broadcasting—Social aspects—Soviet Union. 3. Television broadcasting—Political aspects—Soviet Union. 4. Soviet Union— Politics and government—1982- I. Title. PN5277.T4M53 1988 302.2'345'0947—dc!9 88-4200 CIP 1098 7654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Preface In television terminology, broadcast signals are split when they are divided and sent to two or more locations simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • PJSC FGC UES | Appendices to the Annual Report 2016
    Appene to te Annual Report 2016 Annual Report 2016 1 Appendix 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE SECTIONS OF THE ANNUAL REPORT Contents APPENDIX 1. Additional Information on the The following Appendices are available on the official Company’s website at http://www.fsk-ees.ru/eng/investors/company_reports/ or in the electronic version of the Annual Report of PJSC FGC UES for 2016: Sections of the Annual Report Appendix 1. Additional Information on the Sections of the Annual Report 1 About the Company Appendix 2. Audit Commission’s Report 54 International Activity Appendix 3. Report on Compliance with the Russian Corporate Governance Code and 59 Federal Grid Company (PJSC FGC UES) is the transmission across the border of the Russian Report on Compliance with Main Principles of the UK Corporate Governance organization managing the Unified National Electric Federation and is a technical contractor of the export/ Code Grid (UNEG) under the Federal Law on 26 March 2003 import commercial contracts of the Wholesale Appendix 4. Information on Major Transactions and on Transactions by PJSC FGC UES in 80 No. 35-FZ On Electric Power. Starting from Electricity and Capacity Market (WECM) participants. 2016, Classified Under the laws of the Russian Federation as Related Party 1 January 2004 PJSC FGC UES performs the electricity Transactions Subject To Approval by the Company’s Authorised Governing Bodies Appendix 5. Information on Material Transactions made by PJSC FGC UES and Entities 113 Fnlan Controlled Thereby Appendix 6. Information on the Actual Execution of Instructions of the President and the 116 Government of the Russian Federation Estonia China Appendix 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Director's Corner
    eNews December 16, 2009 (Issue 39) CONTENTS Director’s Corner Jim Van Dam Reports Meeting of the ITER Integrated Modeling Expert Group Don Batchelor Summary of FY09 Joint Facility Milestone Report on Particle Control Steve Allen, and Fuel Retention Charles Skinner, and Dennis Whyte Summary of the Meeting of the ITPA Topical Group on MHD Stability Abhijit Sen, Ted Strait, and Yuri Gribov Upcoming Burning Plasma-related Events 2010 Events 2011 Events Dear Burning Plasma Aficionados: This newsletter provides a short update on U.S. Burning Plasma Organization activities. E-News is also available online at http://burningplasma.org/enews.html Comments on articles in the newsletter may be sent to the Editor (Tom Rognlien [email protected]) or Assistant Editor (Rita Wilkinson [email protected]). Thank you for your interest in Burning Plasma research in the U.S.! Director’s Corner by J. Van Dam USBPO Talk at FPA Annual Meeting At the recent Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting (December 2-3, 2009, Washington, DC), Amanda Hubbard, Chair of the USBPO Council, presented a talk entitled “U.S. Burning Plasma Organization: Supporting U.S. Scientific Contributions to ITER,” which can be found at (http://burningplasma.org/reference.html). 5th ITER Council Meeting The ITER Council held its fifth meeting November 18-19, 2009, at Cadarache, France. The meeting began with an address from the French Minister for Research and Higher Education and the French State Secretary for European Affairs, which contained the following important statement: The most recent project reviews have in effect revealed cost increases and the necessity of carefully taking into account possible technical unknowns.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Public Joint Stock Company ROSSETI 2020 ANNUAL
    Public Joint Stock Company ROSSETI 2020 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT in compliance with the UK Disclosure and Transparency Rules April 2021 Moscow 1 Company review In accordance with Russian Federation Presidential Decree No. 1567 of November 22, 2012 "On Open Joint Stock Company Russian Grids" and the Electric Grid Sector Development Strategy No. 511-r of April 3, 2013, the following functions are assigned to ROSSETI: strategic functions; coordinating functions; supervising functions; addressing the institutional challenges facing the entire industry; participation in the consolidation of local grid operators (LGOs) in order to ensure the required level of reliability and quality of power supply to consumers. History 1992–2008 2003–2008 2008–2013 2014–… Establishment and Restructuring the energy Structuring of the ROSSETI Development and digital activities of RAO industry Group transformation of the UES of Russia JSC ROSSETI Group 1992 Based on the 2003 The Board of Directors of RAO 2012 The Decree of the President of 2017 Ordinary shares of Decree of the UES of Russia JSC developed and the Russian Federation sets out the PJSC ROSSETI were transferred to President of the adopted the strategy of RAO UES of main tasks for further restructuring Level 1 quotation list of the Moscow Russian Federation Russia JSC for 2003–2008 (5 + 5) of the sector, including the Exchange; PJSC ROSSETI's securities which was aimed at creating a RAO UES of Russia, a establishment of JSC ROSSETI to were included in the FTSE4Good competitive market in certain Russian energy improve the efficiency and Emerging Index calculation base segments of the industry, improving development of the electric grid grounded on sustainability criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Report 2013 Corporate Socialand Sustainability Responsibility Report 2013
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2013 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY RESPONSIBILITY SOCIAL AND SUSTAINABILITY CORPORATE REPORT REPORT 2013 www.rosseti.ru/eng CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORT CONTENTS STATEMENT FROM MANAGEMENT 4 I. COMPANY PROFILE 6 1.1. Core Activities 7 1.2. Role and Business Position of the Company 7 1.3. Awards Received in the Reporting Period 8 1.4. Corporate Administration System 8 2. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY SYSTEM 12 2.1. Stakeholder Relations 13 2.2. Development of the Non-Financial Reporting System 18 3. STRATEGY FOR REPUTATIONAL POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATED COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT 20 3.1. Principles and Practices of Disclosures 21 3.2. Main Areas of Integrated Communications 22 3.3. Measures to Implement the Uniform Information Policy 26 4. INTERNAL CONTROL AND RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 28 4.1. Organizational Structure and Goals of Internal Control and Risk Management 29 4.2. Regulatory Documents Applicable to Internal Control and Risk Management 29 4.3. Internal Control System Participants; Their Authority and Responsibility 29 4.4. Measures to Promote Internal Control and Risk Management 32 4.5. Risk Management System of the Company and SDCs 32 4.6. Key Risks of the Company and its SDCs 33 5. DEVELOPMENT OF CUSTOMER RELATIONS 40 5.1. Customer-oriented approach 41 5.2. Tariff Policy 42 5.3. Electricity Distribution Services 45 5.4. Network Connection Services 51 5.5. Customer Service 55 6. ECONOMIC IMPACT 58 6.1. IFRS Key Financial Indicators of the Russian Grids Group 59 6.2. Policy, Practical Approaches to Spending on Locally-Based Suppliers, and Proportion of Such Spending at Significant Locations of Operation 60 6.3.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY REPORT Public Joint Stock Company ROSSETI Issuer Code
    QUARTERLY REPORT Public Joint Stock Company ROSSETI Issuer Code: 55385-E Quarter 3 of 2016 Address of the issuer: Moscow, Russia The information contained in this Quarterly Report is subject to disclosure in accordance with the securities laws of the Russian Federation Director General ____________ O. M. Budargin Date: November 11, 2016 signature Director of the Accounting and Reporting Department and Chief Accountant ____________ V. V. Shchukin Date: November 10, 2016 signature Seal Contact person: Kseniya Valerievna Khokholkova, Deputy Head of the Shareholders’ Equity Division and Head of the Unit for Support for Shareholder Rights of the Department for Corporate Governance and Shareholder and Investor Relations Telephone: (495) 995-5333 #3203 Fax: (495) 664-81-33 E-mail: [email protected] The information contained in this Quarterly Report is available on the Internet at www.rosseti.ru and http://www.e-disclosure.ru/portal/company.aspx?id=13806 1 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Section I. Details of the Issuer’s Bank Accounts, Auditor (Audit Organization), Appraiser, and Financial Advisor and the Individuals Who Signed This Quarterly Report .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Candidates Nominated for Election to the Board of Directors of FGC UES, PJSC and Information on Availability Or
    Information on candidates nominated for election to the Board of Directors of FGC UES, PJSC and information on availability or absence of their written consent to election to the Board of Directors of FGC UES, PJSC Status2 Aggregate Membership in the Boards of Directors of Relation to Shareholdi period of other companies ng in the Shareholder(s) Position (at the Candidate’s Candidate’s position and place of membership in Company No. who nominated Date of birth, education moment of I E N at the date of the report Nominated by the affiliates major Consent Full Name employment in the last 5 years1 the Company’s 1 the candidate nomination) candidate counter- Board of parties Directors 2013 – 2013 Director General, JSC Far East and Baikal Region Development Fund; Year of birth: 1973 2013 – 2014 Temporary Chief Pavel Executive Officer of Polyus Gold Higher Sergeyevich International Limited; Director General of Saint Petersburg State PJSC RusHydro Grachev PJSC 2014 – 2016 Chief Executive Officer PJSC Polyus 3 years 10 1 University, Diploma in Legal PJSC Polyus PJSC RusHydro no no no available (as an ROSSETI of Polyus Gold International Limited; Director General of months Studies, Lawyer; independent 2014 – 2016 President, JSC Polyus LLC “MC Polyus” SL Zoloto LLC director) Krasnoyarsk; University of Trieste, major in 2014 – present day Director General Law, J.D. of PJSC Polyus; 2016 – present day Director General of LLC “MC Polyus” 2008 – present day Member of the Year of birth: 1977 Management Board, Endowment Fund The Russian for Support and Development of the Prosperity Fund, Higher: Saint-Petersburg State University; PJSC "Aeroflot" The Prosperity M.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS
    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody July 5, 2018 Issue No. 2018/24 Company News MTS owners elect board, nod to pay bonuses to management with shares On June 28, 2018 shareholders of major Russian mobile operator MTS elected the board of directors, changing its three members, and decided to pay remuneration to the board with stock instead of cash. The new members on the board are MTS President Alexei Kornya, who headed the company in March, Alexei Katkov, a managing partner at Sistema, MTS’ main shareholder, and independent director Wolfgang Schussel. MTS’ shareholders also approved a new wording of a statement on remuneration of the board members, which stipulates payments in shares, not in money. The board members will not sell the shares for three years. TGC-2 can buy Quadra for RUB 18 bln in September-October 2018 On June 29, 2018 it was reported that Russian power producer Territorial Generating Company-2 (TGC-2) was making due diligence of Quadra to buy it from Onexim of Mikhail Prokhorov in September-October for RUB 18 bln. Onexim bought 48.6% in Quadra, then known as TGC-4, in 2008 during a split of RAO UES of Russia, for RUB 26 bln. Onexim’s stake grew to 49.99% after that. Businessinform of Prokhorov owns 24.74% in the power producer and brokerage company Region 6.4%. A source said that TGC-2 plans to spin off some Quadra assets after the purchase, leaving only generation. Global Ports says appoints Delo Group’s Bychkov as new CEO On June 29, 2018 it was announced that Russian container terminal operator Global Ports appointed Vladimir Bychkov, an executive of one of companies of businessman Sergei Shishkaryov’s Delo Group, as CEO starting from July 16.
    [Show full text]