British Identity and the Royal Navy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

British Identity and the Royal Navy British Identity and the Royal Navy Tension between a Fear of Losing Naval Supremacy and Pride in the Royal Navy Ida Marie Kristensen Master Thesis Lektorprogrammet 30 credits Department of Education Faculty of Educational Sciences UNIVERSITY OF OSLO June 2017 II British Identity and the Royal Navy Tension between a Fear of Losing Naval Supremacy and Pride in the Royal Navy Photograph of the Union Jack. III © Ida Marie Kristensen 2017 British Identity and the Royal Navy Ida Marie Kristensen http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo IV Abstract This thesis has studied the role of the Royal Navy played in creating and maintaining a common British national identity from 1884 to 1914. During this time period the Anglo-German naval arms race unfolded. Great Britain experienced a shift in threat from abroad, as France had been the major threat for centuries preceding this period, suddenly Germany emerged and began to challenge something uniquely British, namely the naval supremacy of the Royal navy. Furthermore, the start of the time period was marked by the naval scare of 1884 and ended with the Great War in 1914. The thesis argues that there was a tension between a fear of losing naval supremacy and a pride in the Royal Navy which resulted in increased public interest in naval affairs as the naval position was being challenged for the first time since the Napoleonic Wars. Therefore, a feeling of pride in the Royal Navy and its historical achievements had been allowed to grow. A common British national identity was necessary for uniting the different groups living within the British Isles. Both older ‘national’ and regional identities existed within Great Britain at the time. A truly ‘British’ institution could therefore be used to unite these groups. The Royal Navy can be seen as such an institution. The navy was also seen as the clearest symbol of the British ‘island race’ which had come to define the British people. The Navy League was founded as a response to the increasing challenge from Germany, and attempted to raise support for the Royal Navy at a time when the navy would prove particularly important for the British public. Public interest in the Royal Navy was used by The Navy League and the Admiralty, by including the navy in public celebrations. The British public were involved in naval affairs, especially during the Dreadnought Crisis of 1909 were the British public influenced the outcome through the use of a slogan; “We want eight and we won’t wait”. V VI Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the help and support of the following, who have contributed to this thesis in numerous ways. First, I would like to express my great appreciation to Dr Atle L. Wold, my supervisor, for encouragement and belief in the project, as well as useful critique and feedback throughout the process. He was also of great help in recommending the use of newspaper articles as primary sources. Secondly, I would like to offer a special thanks to Dr Marianne Czisnik for considerable help in recommending sources for the background study and thus offering appoint of departure for this thesis. A very special thanks to my boyfriend Ole Harald Moe for his support and encouragement throughout this process, not to mention his help in proofreading the thesis and giving constructive feedback. I also wish to acknowledge the help from my friend Annelise Berentsen Kullmann, for help in proofreading this thesis. Finally, I wish to thank my family for their support and encouragement throughout my study. Ida Marie Kristensen Oslo, May 2017. VII VIII Table of Contents British Identity and the Royal Navy ........................................................................... III Abstract ................................................................................................................................. V Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ VII 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.1 Motivation and Previous Work .................................................................................1 1.2 Method .....................................................................................................................3 1.3 Organisation of Thesis ..............................................................................................3 2 Historical Pride in the Royal Navy ..................................................................................5 2.1 Context of threat to British naval position .................................................................5 2.2 The Battle of Trafalgar and Lord Horatio Nelson .................................................... 10 3 Tension ......................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Pride in the Royal Navy.......................................................................................... 16 The ‘Island Race’ .......................................................................................................... 16 ‘Blue Water Strategy’ ................................................................................................... 17 3.2 A Fear of Losing Naval Supremacy ........................................................................ 19 How did the press and public view the Royal Navy in the time period? ......................... 19 Newspapers influence on the Dreadnought Crisis of 1909 ............................................. 22 3.3 Public Support of the Royal Navy .......................................................................... 24 4 Royal Navy and Identity ............................................................................................... 27 4.1 The Royal Navy as a Symbol of ‘Britishness’ ......................................................... 29 The naval theatre and public celebrations ...................................................................... 30 Losing naval supremacy and British identity ................................................................. 31 Ownership of the Royal Navy ....................................................................................... 32 4.2 Britain as an ‘Island Race’ ...................................................................................... 35 5 Influencing Public Interest ............................................................................................ 38 Timing .......................................................................................................................... 39 The Naval Theatre ........................................................................................................ 40 ‘Cohesive society’ ........................................................................................................ 42 6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 44 Bibliography......................................................................................................................... 47 IX List of figures Figure 1: «Articles dealing with British naval issues 1870-1890 in four major periodicals» ....6 Figure 2: Number of hits for the search word «Royal Navy» in the British Newspaper Archives accessed on May 22, 2017. .................................................................................... 15 X 1 Introduction This thesis has studied the presence of a common British national identity where the Royal Navy was a crucial element in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, more specifically from 1884 to 1914. By 1884, Great Britain was a great naval power with the world’s strongest navy and had been for centuries. This was especially true of the period from the victory at the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805. The period studied in this thesis marks the end of the British naval supremacy. During Pax Britannica, which was a period of relative peace in Europe after the Battle of Waterloo in 1815, Great Britain enjoyed a position as unchallenged naval power. The period from 1884 to 1914 was also characterised by rapid technological development and social changes, which threatened the position of the Royal Navy. 1.1 Motivation and Previous Work The motivation for studying the Royal Navy and Great Britain in between 1884 and 1914 was an increase in public interest related to the Royal Navy in the period from 1884 to 1914. This was related to an increased threat towards the British naval position. Several nations, such as Germany, the United States, France, and Russia, were building stronger navies. Therefore, the British had to readjust in order to meet this naval threat. This thesis will argue that Great Britain and the British Empire was proud of its highly distinguished Royal Navy and dependent on being a strong naval power. There was an increased public interest in the Royal Navy during the period. Therefore, the Royal Navy stands out as a relevant object of study in relation to identity building in Great Britain in the period. The thesis question that will be answered is as follows: Did the Royal Navy contribute to creating and maintaining a common British national identity between 1884 and 1914? Identity as a concept requires research, especially when studying Great Britain, as there is so much diversity within the British Isles. Identity is defined
Recommended publications
  • Adobe PDF File
    BOOK REVIEWS David B. Quinn. European Approaches to North analyse social and demographic trends and so America, 1450-1640. Variorum Collected Studies; have been unfashionable for more than a decade" Aldershot and Brookfield, VT: Variorum Press, (221). It is, however, useful for historians and 1998. x + 342 pp., illustrations, maps, charts, others interested in the past to know what hap• index. US $101.95, cloth; ISBN 0-86078-769-9. pened, or at least what is likely to have happened. Quinn may be no exponent of the latest Paris fad This most recent collection of David Quinn's but he remains a scholar whose interpretation of essays on the early European exploration and events inevitably commands respect, precisely settlement of North America follows his Explor• because he is always more interested in making ers and Colonies: America, 1500-1625 (London, sense of the document than in validating a theo• 1990). Like its useful predecessor, European retical preconception. Approaches brings together Quinn's contributions What of the longer essays in this volume, in to several disparate publications. Although most which Quinn cautiously dons the unfamiliar of the essays in the present volume have appeared analytic robe? "Englishmen and Others" is a blunt in scholarly journals or conference proceedings and therefore interesting assessment of how since the late 1980s, that previous exposure does Quinn's compatriots viewed themselves and other not detract from the usefulness of this book. The Europeans on the eve of colonization. The final topics range from imagined Atlantic islands, to essay, "Settlement Patterns in Early Modern perceptions of American ecology, the French fur Colonization," is an analysis of the state of early trade, the settlement of Bermuda, editing Hakluyt, European colonization by 1700.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of the First World War Lesson 4 the Arms Race
    Lesson 4 The Arms Race CAUSES OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR LESSON 4 THE ARMS RACE Objectives/learning outcomes Starter Pupils will:- Discuss with pupils why countries need weapons. What are the threats today? What Know what the term ‘arms race’ were the threats in 1914? means and why this increased the How much does Britain spend on defence? tension between the major powers. Show diagram. Understand why the building of the Get pupils to understand the amount in dreadnought led to a naval arms comparison to other government spending. race. Defence: £44bn Education: £42bn Transport: Evaluate through sources whether £15bn. Germany wanted a war in 1914. Explain Militarism: building up armed forces; getting ready for war. Can this be applied to some countries today? Why did this happen up to 1914? Activities and homework Plenary Give pupils the following words/phrases:- Activity 1 The Arms Race Fear Activity 2 Jealousy The Dreadnought and the Naval Arms Naval Superiority Race Empire building [A linked cause] Activity 3 Worsening relations Did Germany want a war in 1914? More money spent on armaments Ask them to start with one word/phrase and Homework answer orally the question, ‘How did the arms Homework 1 Cartoon Analysis race help cause the First World War?’ [Advanced] Homework 1 Admiral Von Tirpitz They can use any of the other words/phrases [Standard] to answer the question. Causes of the First World War History Interactive© 1 Lesson 4 The Arms Race STARTER ACTIVITY Britain’s Defence Spending 2009 Equipment • £6.1bn Pay • £5.6bn • £2.6bn Wars Afghanistan • £2bn Iraq War pensions • £1bn Weapons • 27bn About £45 billion Causes of the First World War History Interactive© 2 Lesson 4 The Arms Race ACTIVITY 1 THE ARMS RACE How did the Arms Race add to the tensions between the major powers? ARMS RACE This was competition between countries to build up their military strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Commemorating Trafalgar Day 2020
    COMMEMORATING TRAFALGAR DAY 2020 Wednesday 21 October As we know, our National EVENING SCHEDULE Trafalgar Day this year is to be 5.50pm Unwind from school and get in the mood for Trafalgar Day by scaled down due to the ongoing learning about the day through our fact finder. pandemic. But don’t worry! We’ve put together this activity 6.00pm Create a drink for the evening. Smoothy or squash, what’s pack for you to complete on going to be your tonic to keep scurvy at bay? the evening of Wednesday 6.30pm We’ll be launching the official Trafalgar Day video on our 21 October. social media channels. Watch to see cadets lay the memorial Work through the activities with wreath on Trafalgar Square and share a moment’s silence to friends or on your own and be remember those who have fallen. sure to join us on social media 6.45pm Post your virtual salutes to your social media channels and on the evening by using the be sure to tag @SeaCadetsUK in and we’ll share them on #VirtualTrafalgarDay2020 Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Tik-Tok. 7.00pm Tackle our two activities. Create your bicorn hat and craft your floating craft using the guidelines in the pack. 2 6 FACT FINDING VOYAGE HMS Victory had 104 guns and was constructed from 6,000 oaks and elm trees. Its sails required 26 miles of rope 1 and rigging for the three masts, and On 21 October 1805, the British fleet, because there were so many manual jobs, under the command of Admiral Nelson, it was crewed by over 800 men.
    [Show full text]
  • Newslettejan2006
    NEWSLETTER of THE NELSON SOCIETY OF AUSTRALIA INC January 2006 Souvenir Edition THE BI-Centennial CELEBRATIONS Vice Admiral Viscount Lord Nelson 2006 PROGRAMME St Michael’s Church Hall, Cnr. the Promenade & Gunbower Rd, Mt Pleasant, WA Meetings at 7pm for 7.30 start. Feb 13th — 7pm Time Capsule finally put to rest in Memorial Garden of St Michael’s followed at 7.30pm by a lecture by Mike Sargeant Nelson’s Funeral Mar 20th — AGM - Short talk on ‘Baudin’ by a member of the Baudin Society. May 8th — To be announced later July 10th — Video — 2005 Fleet review Sept 11th — Nelson’s Trial — to be confirmed Oct 22nd — Memorial Service Nov 10th — Pickle Night. Highlights of the Royal Naval Association. Bi-Centennial Trafalgar Dinner at the South of Perth Yacht Club, 21 October 2005 South of Perth Yacht Club Foreshore Pictures of Evening Colours and the RAN band Page 3 Newsletter of the Nelson Society of Australia Inc. Jan. 2006 More Highlights HMS Voctory Page 4 Newsletter of the Nelson Society of Australia Inc. Jan. 2006 The Trafalgar Dinner 21 October 2005 Ivan Hunter & Rear Admiral Phil Kennedy Commodore David Orr Nelson’s Writing set This bone china writing set was in the possession of Vice Admiral Lord Nelson on the Victory at the Battle of Trafalgar. Its present owners are the Family descendants of Nelson’s sister, Kitty Matcham. Below left is Mrs Audrey Oliver, a direct descendant of Nelson’s Sister. Below is Mark Kumara also a Nelson family descendant. Page 5 Newsletter of the Nelson Society of Australia Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    BINDEX 06/25/2018 18:16:29 Page 379 INDEX ‘Ndrangheta, 261 Ambedkar, B. R., 115, 150, 238, 273, 1848 revolutions, 306 282, 311 1955 System, 137 American Civil War, 94 9/11, 178, 269, 273, 301, 302 American Constitution, 109, 318 Amin al-Husseini, Haj, 100 Aam Aadmi Party, 311 Amin, Idi, 127, 255 Abdullah of Jordan, King, 120 Amritsar Massacre (1919), 30, 48 Abe, Shinzo, 317 anarchism, 5, 10, 44, 61, 159, 219, 306 Aborigines, 38, 74, 265, 272, 275 Andaman Islands, 267 Abyssinia, 97, 250, 265 Anglo-Boer War, 16, 31, 39 Action Française, 59, 67, 81, 109, 225 Anglo-Egyptian Treaty (1936), 55 Adenauer, Konrad, 109, 132, 244 Anglo-Hindu law, 278 Advani, L. K., 171 Anglo-Iraq treaties; (1926), (1932) African National Congress, 142, 155, Anglo-Muhammadan law, 278 156, 176, 281, 312 Anglo-Russian Entente (1907), 22 Afrikaners, 31, 73, 127, 155, 279 animals in war, 210, 295 agricultural reforms, 54, 63, 75, 84, 85, Antarctica, 15 94, 119, 124, 127, 129, 134, 135, 146, Anthropocene, 214, 287, 295, 296 151, 153, 185, 232, 284, 291, 297, 307, Anthropology, 8, 179, 183, 186–189, 309, 316 192, 232, 234, 296 Ahmadiyya, 168, 234 anti-fascist resistance, 133 AIDS, 204, 205, 288, 289, 312, 323 Anti-French War, 123 Alawites, 22, 280 anti-hunting protests, 210, 295 Alexander I of Yugoslavia, King, 62 anti-Nazi resistance, 65 Alger Hiss case, 110 anti-Semitism, 16, 60, 66, 81, 100, 103, Algerian War of Independence,COPYRIGHTED 185 197, 243, 251,MATERIAL 256, 299, 308 Algérie Française, 156 Anti-US War, 123 Ali, Mehmet, 239, 240 anti-Vietnam War protests, 143, 200 Ali, Muhammad, 210 Antonius, George, 22, 28 Aligarh Muslim University, 207 Apartheid, 90, 127, 135, 156, 163, 174, Allahabad, 111, 276 176, 210, 255, 268, 279, 285, 296, 311, Allende, Salvador, 159 312 Allied Powers (First World War), 13, 96 Appadurai, Arjun, 6, 299 Remaking the Modern World 1900–2015: Global Connections and Comparisons, First Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 History Standard Grade − Credit Finalised Marking
    © 2010 History Standard Grade − Credit Finalised Marking Instructions © Scottish Qualifications Authority 2010 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only on a non- commercial basis. If it is to be used for any other purposes written permission must be obtained from the External Print Team, Centre Services, Dalkeith. Where the publication includes materials from sources other than SQA (secondary copyright), this material should only be reproduced for the purposes of examination or assessment. If it needs to be reproduced for any other purpose it is the centre’s responsibility to obtain the necessary copyright clearance. SQA’s External Print Team, Centre Services, at Dalkeith may be able to direct you to the secondary sources. These Marking Instructions have been prepared by Examination Teams for use by SQA Appointed Markers when marking External Course Assessments. This publication must not be reproduced for commercial or trade purposes. Information for markers The following general instructions are provided for the guidance of markers at all levels. It is vitally important that all markers are totally familiar with the candidate performance requirements, as set out in the correct arrangements document, for both assessable elements at each level in terms of: process; the place of recalled evidence where this is required. Marking conventions Markers must carefully observe the following points: All marking on candidate scripts must be in red biro. All marking must be carefully placed in the correct column on the right of the script: KU marks in the left column; ES marks in the right column. Half marks must not be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Lord Nelson and the Battle of Trafalgar
    Lord Nelson and the Battle of Trafalgar Lord Nelson and the early years Horatio Nelson was born in Norfolk in 1758. As a young child he wasn’t particularly healthy but he still went on to become one of Britain’s greatest heroes. Nelson’s father, Edmund Nelson, was the Rector of Burnham Thorpe, the small Norfolk village in which they lived. His mother died when he was only 9 years old. Nelson came from a very big family – huge in fact! He was the sixth of 11 children. He showed an early love for the sea, joining the navy at the age of just 12 on a ship captained by his uncle. Nelson must have been good at his job because he became a captain at the age of 20. He was one of the youngest-ever captains in the Royal Navy. Nelson married Frances Nisbet in 1787 on the Caribbean island of Nevis. Although Nelson was married to Frances, he fell in love with Lady Hamilton in Naples in Italy. They had a child together, Horatia in 1801. Lord Nelson, the Sailor Britain was at war during much of Nelson’s life so he spent many years in battle and during that time he became ill (he contracted malaria), was seriously injured. As well as losing the sight in his right eye he lost one arm and nearly lost the other – and finally, during his most famous battle, he lost his life. Nelson’s job helped him see the world. He travelled to the Caribbean, Denmark and Egypt to fight battles and also sailed close to the North Pole.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism, Geopolitics, and Naval Expansionism from the Nineteenth Century to the Rise of China Robert S
    Naval War College Review Volume 71 Article 4 Number 4 Autumn 2018 Nationalism, Geopolitics, and Naval Expansionism From the Nineteenth Century to the Rise of China Robert S. Ross Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Ross, Robert S. (2018) "Nationalism, Geopolitics, and Naval Expansionism From the Nineteenth Century to the Rise of China," Naval War College Review: Vol. 71 : No. 4 , Article 4. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol71/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ross: Nationalism, Geopolitics, and Naval Expansionism From the Ninetee NATIONALISM, GEOPOLITICS, AND NAVAL EXPANSIONISM From the Nineteenth Century to the Rise of China Robert S. Ross here is perhaps no more momentous great-power strategic decision, short of launching a war, than to develop a power-projection, war-winning mari- Ttime capability—thereby challenging, and risking heightened conflict with, an established maritime power� The likely costs of such a decision should caution the rising power against pursuing expansive naval ambitions� Such costs include the long-term costs of building the requisite number of surface ships that possess the advanced engineering and military capabilities necessary to
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting the Enemy British-German Encounters in the Occupied Rhineland After the First World War
    Angles New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10 | 2020 Creating the Enemy Meeting the Enemy British-German Encounters in the Occupied Rhineland after the First World War Tom Williams Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/angles/488 DOI: 10.4000/angles.488 ISSN: 2274-2042 Publisher Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur Electronic reference Tom Williams, « Meeting the Enemy », Angles [Online], 10 | 2020, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 28 July 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/angles/488 ; DOI : https://doi.org/ 10.4000/angles.488 This text was automatically generated on 28 July 2020. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Meeting the Enemy 1 Meeting the Enemy British-German Encounters in the Occupied Rhineland after the First World War Tom Williams 1 Negative stereotypes of the German enemy were so pervasive in Britain during the First World War that, when crossing into German territory at the end of the conflict, the writer and social reformer Violet Markham remarked that it was “almost with a shock that you realise that German civilians are not equipped with hoofs and horns or other attributes of a Satanic character” (Markham 1921: 15). Visions of a brutal, arrogant, warmongering “Hun”, disseminated since 1914 in British propaganda as a means of justifying wartime mobilization and sacrifice, proved difficult to sustain once British soldiers and civilians met individual Germans face-to-face in the occupied Rhineland. However effective they may be as a propaganda tool for galvanising public opinion in wartime, enemy images inevitably require a process of psychological abstraction, relying on a set of beliefs and assumptions that often bear little relation to socio- historical realities or individual experiences (Rieber & Kelly 1991; Oppenheimer 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Volume 5. Wilhelmine Germany and the First World War, 1890-1918
    Volume 5. Wilhelmine Germany and the First World War, 1890-1918 England and the German Fleet: Alfred von Tirpitz looks back on the Naval Race (1920) In his memoirs, Alfred von Tirpitz (1849-1930) looks back on the arms race that led up to World War I. He faults both German diplomacy and British animosity for the escalation of tensions between the two industrial powers. For Tirpitz, the Moroccan crisis of 1911 was the single most unfortunate event in Anglo-German relations. 1. In the first few years of its encirclement policy, England did not take Germany’s fleet construction program seriously. It was convinced that Germany would not be able to build a first-class fleet with its limited budget. The English believed that our technology was under- developed and that we lacked sufficient organizational experience. They were accustomed to seeing us fail, since a large number of Prussian and German naval plans had never made it past the planning stages. It was only in 1904 that they looked at our naval program anew. Contrary to my wishes, we presented all our ships to Edward VII at the Kiel Regatta Week, and the Kaiser toasted ―the renewed maritime power of the newly created German Empire.‖ King Edward responded coolly and, when inspecting our ships, exchanged meaningful glances and words with Selborne, the first lord of the Admiralty. These exchanges were disagreeable to me. It was an unpleasant shock to the English that we had accomplished so much with limited funds and that we had developed an organic process that was more methodical than their own.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Britain, 1945–1965 : the Air Ministry and the Few / Garry Campion
    Copyrighted material – 978–0–230–28454–8 © Garry Campion 2015 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978–0–230–28454–8 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Side of the Global Imbalances: the Politics of Economic Reform in China Under the ‘New Normal’
    The Other Side of the Global Imbalances: The Politics of Economic Reform in China Under the ‘New Normal’ Chen Xie PhD University of York Politics March 2018 2 Abstract In the 21st century, the ‘rise of China’ in the post-financial crisis period is arguably the most important and widely debated topic in politics and international studies. Since, the 2008 financial crisis, compared with the US, whose power appears to have diminished, it seems more and more likely that China will soon become the engine of the world economy and, perhaps, one day the global hegemon. Although the financial crisis may have not, in itself, fundamentally changed the shape of the global order, it has arguably altered perceptions. This is especially so regarding the ‘global imbalances’ that are said to have provided the macro-economic conditions for the crisis to occur. Equally, the different positions occupied by the US - as the world’s largest debtor - and China - as the world’s largest creditor - both prior to and after the crisis are suggestive of a fundamental power shift in the global order. In this thesis, I aim to add to existing understandings of the rise of China by examining the relationship between its rise and the global imbalances in the contemporary order. In order to address my thesis questions, I utilise concepts and arguments about the relationship between power, institutions and the global order provided by different scholars and theoretical traditions in IPE. Based on these, I review the experiences of Britain and the US in three key historical periods of global imbalance in 19th and 20th centuries that are analogous to the role of China in the contemporary global imbalances.
    [Show full text]