DOCSLIB.ORG

From Social History to the History of Society Author(S): E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Social History to the History of Society Author(S): E From Social History to the History of Society Author(s): E. J. Hobsbawm Source: Daedalus, Vol. 100, No. 1, Historical Studies Today (Winter, 1971), pp. 20-45 Published by: The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20023989 Accessed: 23/03/2009 03:18 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mitpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The MIT Press and American Academy of Arts & Sciences are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Daedalus. http://www.jstor.org E. J. HOBSBAWM From Social History to the History of Society essay is an to a This attempt observe and analyze, not to state or to is personal credo express (except where this clearly stated) the this at author's preferences and value judgments. I say the to are outset in order distinguish this essay from others which or for their defenses of pleas the kind of history practiced by it at authors?as happens social history does not need either the to two com moment?but also avoid misunderstandings especially mon in discussions heavily charged with ideology. All discus are. sions about social history to The first is the tendency for readers identify authors with the views they write about, unless they disclaim this identification even so. in the clearest terms and sometimes when they do The or second is the tendency to confuse the ideological political moti vations of research, or its utilization, with its scientific value. Where or or as is often ideological intention bias produces triviality error, case we the in the human sciences, may happily condemn motiva a tion, method, and result. However, life would be great deal simpler our were those if understanding of history advanced exclusively by we are in or in on with whom agreement sympathy all public and even private matters. Social history is at present in fashion. to seen None of those who practice it would care be keeping with all those who come under the same ideological company is more than to historical heading. Nevertheless, what important define one's attitude is to discover where social history stands today if after two decades of unsystematic copious development, and it whither might go. I term The social history has always been difficult to define, and no to until recently there has been great pressure define it, for it has lacked the institutional and professional vested interests which 20 Social History to the History of Society on until normally insist precise demarcations. Broadly speaking, at name?it was in the present vogue of the subject?or least of the senses. it the past used in three sometimes overlapping First, or more referred to the history of the poor lower classes, and spe move cifically to the history of the movements of the poor ( "social even more ments"). The term could be specialized, referring to essentially the history of labor and socialist ideas and organiza reasons tions. For obvious this link between social history and the or movements history of social protest socialist has remained strong. A number of social historians have been attracted to the subject were or as because they radicals socialists and such interested in subjects of great sentimental relevance to them.1 was on a Second, the term used to refer to works variety of to in terms as human activities difficult classify except such "man rea ners, customs, everyday life." This was, perhaps for linguistic a since the sons, largely Anglo-Saxon usage, English language lacks suitable terms for what the Germans who wrote about similar sub in a manner? jects?often also rather superficial and journalistic or was called Kultur- Sittengeschichte. This kind of social history not oriented the lower particularly toward classes?indeed rather more the opposite?though the politically radical practitioners tended to pay attention to them. It formed the unspoken basis of was what may be called the residual view of social history, which in put forward by the late G. M. Trevelyan his English Social as It History (London, 1944) "history with the politics left out." no comment. requires term was common The third meaning of the certainly the most and for our purposes the most relevant: "social" was used in com bination with "economic history." Indeed, outside the Anglo Saxon world, the title of the typical specialist journal in this field before the Second World War always ( I think ) bracketed the two as in u. words, the Vierteljahrschrift fuer Sozial Wirtschaftsgeschi chte, the Revue dHistoire E. 6- S., or the Annales d'Histoire E. ?r S. It must be admitted that the economic half of this combination was were overwhelmingly preponderant. There hardly any social histories of equivalent caliber to set beside the numerous volumes to economic devoted the history of various countries, periods, and were subjects. There in fact not very many economic and social 1939 otie can a histories. Before think of only few such works, admittedly sometimes by impressive authors (Pirenne, Mikhail W. mono Rostovtzeff, J. Thompson, perhaps Dopsch), and the 21 D DALUS or was graphic periodical literature even sparser. Nevertheless, the habitual bracketing of economic and social, whether in the or definitions of the general field of historical specialization under the more banner of economic is specialized history, significant. an to It revealed the desire for approach history systemati one. cally different from the classical Rankean What interested historians of this kind was the evolution of the economy, and this in turn it on interested them because of the light threw the struc ture and in more on changes society, and especially the relation as ship between classes and social groups, George Unwin ad mitted.2 This social dimension is evident even in the work of the most or economic so as narrowly cautiously historians long they to claimed be historians. Even J. H. Clapham argued that economic was history of all varieties of history the most fundamental be cause was it the foundation of society. The predominance of the over we economic the social in this combination had, may suggest, two reasons. It was to a economic partly owing view of theory which refused to isolate the economic from social, institutional, and other elements, as with the Marxists and the German historical to over school, and partly the sheer headstart of economics the other social sciences. If to history had be integrated into the social economics was the one it had to come sciences, primarily to terms with. One might go further and argue (with Marx) that, whatever the essential inseparability of the economic and the social in human society, the analytical base of any historical inquiry into the evolu tion of human societies must be the process of social production. the a None of three versions of social history produced spe academic field social until the at cialized of history 1950's, though one time the famous Annales of Lucien Febvre and Marc Bloch the economic its dropped half of subtitle and proclaimed itself was a purely social. However, this temporary diversion of the war now years, and the title by which this great journal has been a a known for quarter of century?Annales: ?conomies, soci?t?s, well as nature its civilisations?as the of contents, reflect the origi nal and essentially global and comprehensive aims of its founders. nor Neither the subject itself, the discussion of its problems, de in veloped seriously before 1950. The journals specializing it, still few in number, were not founded until the end of the 1950's: we may perhaps regard the Comparative Studies in Society and His as an tory (1958) the first. As academic specialization, social new. history is therefore quite 22 Social History to the History of Society and What explains the rapid development growing emancipa in The could tion of social history the past twenty years? question be answered in terms of technical and institutional changes within deliberate the academic disciplines of social science: the speciali zation of economic history to fit in with the requirements of the economic and of which the rapidly developing theory analysis, is an and "new economic history" example; the remarkable world as an wide growth of sociology academic subject and fashion, turn which in called for subsidiary historical service-branches to cannot analogous those required by economics departments. We as neglect such factors. Many historians (such the Marxists) who had previously labeled themselves economic because the prob were in were not or even lems they interested plainly encouraged ex considered by orthodox general history, found themselves a economic truded from rapidly narrowing history and accepted or if welcomed the title of "social historians," especially their mathe matics were is in poor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historians of Technology in the Real World: Reflections on the Pursuit of Policy-Oriented History
    Historians of Technology in the Real World: Reflections on the Pursuit of Policy-Oriented History Richard F. Hirsh Technology and Culture, Volume 52, Number 1, January 2011, pp. 6-20 (Article) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: 10.1353/tech.2011.0039 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/tech/summary/v052/52.1.hirsh.html Access provided by Virginia Polytechnic Inst. __ACCESS_STATEMENT__ St.University __ACCESS_STATEMENT__ (Viva) (6 Feb 2014 13:11 GMT) 02_52.1hirsh 6–20:03_49.3dobraszczyk 568– 1/22/11 7:49 AM Page 6 Historians of Technology in the Real World Reflections on the Pursuit of Policy-Oriented History RICHARDF.HIRSH Nearly all historians writing about their craft begin by explaining the value of studying the past. According to the authors of a popular primer, history represents a collective memory that provides an awareness of past events, helping us shape our present and future.1 History has great practical signif- icance, notes another academic, because “intelligent action” draws on past experience.2 As a consequence of the way pedagogues extol the relevance of their work, many high-school students can paraphrase Santayana’s dictum that “[t]hose who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”3 Despite widespread acceptance of the notion that history provides tan- gible benefits, historians usually remain reluctant to apply “lessons” to real- world situations, especially in the realms of public and business policy. Eager to be viewed as unbiased, dispassionate observers of events, most aca- demic historians seem happy to write primarily for their peers.
    [Show full text]
  • Social History Would Be Termed ‘Social Geography’ There Has Been Too Jones E 1975 Readings in Social Geography
    Social History would be termed ‘social geography’ there has been too Jones E 1975 Readings in Social Geography. Oxford University little interaction between those researchers working on Press, Oxford, UK developing and developed countries. There are, how- Johnston R J 1987 Theory and methodology in social geo- ever, some indications that this is changing with graphy. In: Pacione M (ed.) Social Geography: Progress and Prospect. Croom Helm, London greater appreciation of the implications of the globali- Johnston R L, Gregory D, Smith D M 1994 The Dictionary of zation of communication and economic relationships Human Geography, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, UK and the significance of diasporic cultures. Meinig D (ed.) 1979 The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes. For many social geographers the growth of cultural Oxford University Press, New York geography presents an opportunity to combine many Pahl R 1965 Trends in social geography. In: Chorley R J, of the themes of the two sub-disciplines in fruitful Haggett P (eds.) Frontiers in Geographical Teaching. Methuen, investigation of social inequality and difference and to London focus on and destabilize definitions of a wider range of Pahl 1975 Whose City? 2nd edn. Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK ‘social groups’—such as disabled people and gay and Rex J 1968 The sociology of a zone in transition. In: Pahl R E (ed.) Readings in Urban Sociology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, lesbian people. Social geographers’ tradition of pol- UK itical engagement and ethnographic research can Smith D 1977 Human Geography: A Welfare Approach. Edward combine positively with cultural geographers’ sen- Arnold, New York sitivity to discourse and symbolic expression of dif- Shevky E, Bell W 1955 Social Area Analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Sociology Vs. History
    Julia Adams. The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005. xi + 235 pp. $35.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8014-3308-5. Reviewed by Susan R. Boettcher Published on H-Low-Countries (November, 2007) Historical Sociology vs. History discipline, gender relations) developed by practi‐ Two fundamental concerns of historical soci‐ tioners of the "new cultural history."[2] In her ology have always been the origin and nature of new book on the relationship of gender to devel‐ modernity. In response to modernization and de‐ oping states, Adams claims to be "charting ... new pendency theory, which seemed to present territory in the study of the formation of Euro‐ modernity as an objectively describable condi‐ pean states" (p. 12). However, while Adams adds tion, previous generations of historical sociolo‐ some elements to her account, especially gender gists studied comparative issues in early modern and the colonial economy, if this work is indica‐ European history, especially themes emphasized tive of the "new" historical sociology, it provides in that body of theory, such as democratic revolu‐ us primarily with another version of the story tion and the emergence of the nation-state. Those rather than new questions, different approaches, sociologists (one thinks of Charles Tilly, Theda or perhaps most importantly, new characteriza‐ Skocpol, Barrington Moore, and Immanuel tions of the genesis and trajectory of the early Wallerstein) enriched not only the questions his‐ modern state. torians asked but substantially influenced the so‐ Adams's book is organized in an introduction cial history written in response.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Theory (His2c01)
    HISTORY AND THEORY (HIS2C01) STUDY MATERIAL II SEMESTER CORE COURSE M.A. HISTORY (2019 Admission onwards) UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT SCHOOL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. MALAPPURAM - 673 635, KERALA 190505 School of Distance Education, University of Calicut 1 School of Distance Education, University of Calicut 2 HIS2C01 : HISTORY AND THEORY SCHOOL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT STUDY MATERIAL SECOND SEMESTER M.A. HISTORY (2019 Admission onwards) CORE COURSE: HIS2C01 : HISTORY AND THEORY Prepared by: Dr. MYTHRI P U Assistant Professor (on contract) Department of History University of Calicut Scrutinized by: Sri. MUJEEB RAHIMAN K.G. Assistant Professor Department of History Govt. Arts & Science College Calicut School of Distance Education, University of Calicut 3 HIS2C01 : HISTORY AND THEORY School of Distance Education, University of Calicut 4 HIS2C01 : HISTORY AND THEORY CONTENTS Module I Enlightenment and the Perception of Historical Past 7 Module II History and Classical Social theory 35 Module III The Annales 63 Module IV Methodological Debates and Contemporary Trends 84 School of Distance Education, University of Calicut 5 HIS2C01 : HISTORY AND THEORY School of Distance Education, University of Calicut 6 HIS2C01 : HISTORY AND THEORY Module 1 Enlightenment and the Perception of Historical Past Vico Giovanni Battista Vico (1668–1744) spent most of his professional life as Professor of Rhetoric at the University of Naples. He was trained in jurisprudence, but read widely in Classics, philology, and philosophy, all of which informed his highly original views on history, historiography, and culture. His thought is most fully expressed in his mature work, the Scienza Nuova or The New Science.
    [Show full text]
  • History from a Philosophic Perspective
    CANADIAN SOCIAL STUDIES VOLUME 41 NUMBER 1, Fall 2008 www.quasar.ualberta.ca/css History from a Philosophic Perspective Catherine Broom Simon Fraser University Return to Articles Abstract One of the key components of Social Studies has always been history, yet many of us seldom explore what we mean by history. This paper delves into the meaning of history through an examination of Collingwood’s work and a discussion of how we can incorporate twentieth century thought into his work. This paper aims, in Collingwood’s words, to “deepen understanding” of our craft. Philosophy of History: Collingwood The philosophies of history of Thucydides, Plato, Aristotle, Polybius, St Augustine, Bodin, Vico, Herder, and Hegel (selections in Tillinghast, 1963) and Collingwood (1956) make clear that understanding “history” is not easy. The questions that have to be answered, such as for and of whom is it written and why, are philosophical ones. Most of these philosophers saw history from a religious viewpoint: they viewed its events as illustrating the unfolding of “Providence,” or God’s purpose. However, Collingwood’s work (1956) illustrates the true meaning of history. Collingwood argues that certain early accounts, such as in pre­Greek societies, or certain modern accounts, like those based on dividing societies into a number of epochs, such as Marx’s, are not really history, as they shape facts to suit their larger theoretical frameworks. Rather, history is the re­enactment of past thought in the mind of a historian in order to answer a question about people in the past the historian has first articulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Historical Anthropology Jacques Le Goff and Aaron J
    Exploring Historical Anthropology Jacques Le Goff and Aaron J. Gurevich Leonore Scholze-Irrlit z Scholze-Irrlitz, Leonore 1994 : Exploring Historical Anthropology. Jacques Le Goff and Aaron J. Gurevich . - Ethnologia Europaea 24: 119-132. The different styles of research of two historians - Jacques Le Goff and Aaron J . Gurevich - are analysed and compared. Both understand anthropology as th e basis of a new all-encompassing attempt at synthesising historical studies, and produce ind ependent results by taking into consideration lit erary-hermeneut­ ical, ethnological and structuralistic methods, thus forming two different co­ existing "styles of relationship" of medieval mentality. Le Goff and Gurevich contribute to historical anthropology and to a publicly effective renewal of the science of history through explanatory, deterministic and contemporary exam­ ination. An interview with A. J. Gurevich on the relationship between social history and the history of mentality is published as an append ix. Dr. phil. Leonore Scholze-Irrlitz, Eichbergstr. 23, D-12589 Berlin-Wilhelmsha­ gen. This paper deals with the styles of research and space (Le Goff 1970: 215 and 1977: 25, Le and the methods of Jacques Le Goff and Aaron Goff & Chartier 1990: 13). Significant for the J. Gurevich - two historians from very differ­ "Annales" school and also for Le Goff are fur­ ent scientific traditions. The contribution both ther the comparative methods of historical in­ of these medieval specialists have made to his­ terpretation and the concept of "histoire to­ torical anthropology reveals new dimensions tale" (Le Goff 1983 : XI, Honegger 1977: 13-14, in the science of history. Burke 1991: 29). The "Annales" went through three stages of development, the last of which is characterized by J.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Era in the Study of Global History Is Born but It Needs to Be Nurtured
    [JCH 5.1-2 (2018–19)] JCH (print) ISSN 2051-9672 https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.39422 JCH (online) ISSN 2051-9680 A New Era in the Study of Global History is Born but It Needs to be Nurtured Harvey Whitehouse1 University of Oxford, UK Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) Peter Turchin2 University of Connecticut Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) Pieter François3, Patrick E. Savage4, Thomas E. Currie5, Kevin C. Feeney6, Enrico Cioni7, Rosalind Purcell8, Robert M. Ross9, Jennifer Larson10, John Baines11, Barend ter Haar12, R. Alan Covey13 Abstract: Thisa rticle is a response to Slingerland e t al. who criticize the quality of the data from Seshat: Global History Databank utilized in our Nature paper entitled “Complex Societies Precede Moralizing Gods throughout World History”. Their cri- tique centres around the roles played by research assistants and experts in procuring and curating data, periodization structure, and so-called “data pasting” and “data fill- ing”. We show that these criticisms are based on misunderstandings or misrepresenta- tions of the methods used by Seshat researchers. Overall, Slingerland et al.’s critique (which is crosslinked online here) does not call into question any of our main findings, but it does highlight various shortcomings of Slingerland et al.’s database project. Our collective efforts to code and quantify features of global history hold out the promise of a new era in the study of global history but only if critique can be conducted con- structively in good faith and both the benefitsa nd the pitfalls of open science fully recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historiography of Social Movements Å
    Chapter 1 The Historiography of Social Movements å Halfway through the twentieth century, Fernand Braudel raised a call for establishing a productive dialogue between history and the social sciences whereby history might freely employ indispensable concepts that it was incapable of developing by itself, and the social sciences might acquire the temporal depth they lacked. He went on to state that there would be no social science ‘other than by the reconciliation in a simultaneous practice of our different crafts’. The convergence of history with the social sciences was baptized ‘social history’ and later, in the United States, as ‘historical sociology’ to underline sociologists’ shift towards historiography.1 At the fi rst international congress of historical sciences held after the Second World War in Paris, 1950, Eric Hobsbawm was involved in the section on social history, ‘probably the fi rst in any historical congress’, as he recalls in his autobiography.2 It gained momentum in 1952 with the creation of the British journal Past and Present, which brought to- gether a group of Marxist historians (Hobsbawm himself, Christopher Hill, Rodney Hilton, George Rudé, and E.P. Thompson), joined by such prominent scholars as Lawrence Stone, John Elliot and Moses Finley. Meanwhile, in the United States, historical sociology took its fi rst steps forward with Barrington Moore, the Harvard teacher of Charles Tilly. It would be very hard to fi nd a sociologist who has taken better ad- vantage of history than Tilly. With the exception of his fi rst book, on the counter-revolution in the Vendée (published in 1964), long duration, which Braudel conceptualized as the history of structures, is the time- frame for Tilly’s analysis, whether it be of social struggles in France, state systems, European revolutions, democracy or social movements worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Domestication of Historical Sociology
    The Rise and Domestication of" Historical Sociology Craig Calhoun Historical sociology is not really new, though it has enjoyed a certain vogue in the last twenty years. In fact, historical research and scholarship (including comparative history) was central to the work of many of the founders and forerunners of sociology-most notably Max Weber but also in varying degrees Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Alexis de Tocqueville among others. It was practiced with distinction more recently by sociologists as disparate as George Homans, Robert Merton, Robert Bellah, Seymour Martin Lipset, Charles Tilly, J. A. Banks, Shmuel Eisenstadt, Reinhard Bendix, Barrington Moore, and Neil Smelser. Why then, should historical sociology have seemed both new and controversial in the 1970s and early 1980s? The answer lies less in the work of historical sociologists themselves than in the orthodoxies of mainstream, especially American, sociology of the time. Historical sociologists picked one battle for themselves: they mounted an attack on modernization theory, challenging its unilinear developmental ten- dencies, its problematic histori<:al generalizations and the dominance (at least in much of sociology) of culture and psycllology over political economy. In this attack, the new generation of historical sociologists challenged the most influential of their immediate forebears (and sometimes helped to create the illusion that historical sociology was the novel invention of the younger gener- ation). The other major battle was thrust upon historical sociologists when many leaders of the dominant quantitative, scientistic branch of the discipline dismissed their work as dangerously "idiographic," excessively political, and in any case somehow not quite 'real' sociology. Historical sociology has borne the marks of both battles, and in some sense, like an army always getting ready to fight the last war, it remains unnecessarily preoccupied with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Labeling and Analyzing Historical Phenomena: Some Preliminary Challenges Kenneth Pomeranz University of California at Irvine
    Cliodynamics: the Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical History Labeling and Analyzing Historical Phenomena: Some Preliminary Challenges Kenneth Pomeranz University of California at Irvine A serious obstacle to the search for a more scientific history is that humans label themselves and their actions. These labels can be extremely sticky and often obscure the categories which might be most useful for seeking regularities. Another, related, problem is a focus on dramatic events that seem to be relatively rare and are commonly recognized as landmarks, e.g. political and industrial revolutions. Having formed several of these major events into a class, scientifically-minded historians have then often searched for a very small set of discrete variables that could predict the occurrence or non-occurrence of these very special events. By contrast, I would argue that we are likely to be better off by looking at more general processes that may include but are not limited to these dramatic events, and looking for clusters of variables which interact with each other; the hoped-for result would usually be not to explain the categorical presence or absence of some process (e.g., “economic development”) but to group many cases into families, seeking to explain both within-group and between-group variation by means of systematic comparison. Naming Historical Events and Processes: Problems of Familiarity Historians often say that because they study processes in which the participants are consciously trying to affect the results, they cannot be expected to come up with generalizations comparable to those found by people studying, say, microbes or electrons. But human volition need not be a fatal obstacle to the search for a more scientific history; it does not rule out the possibility that there are regularities to be found in these human responses, at various levels of aggregation.
    [Show full text]
  • Historiography in French Theory
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 9-25-2015 12:00 AM Historiography in French Theory Eric J. Guzzi The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Antonio Calcagno The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Theory and Criticism A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Eric J. Guzzi 2015 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Guzzi, Eric J., "Historiography in French Theory" (2015). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 3255. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3255 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTORIOGRAPHY IN FRENCH THEORY (Thesis Format: Monograph) By Eric Guzzi Graduate Program in Theory & Criticism A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Creative Commons 2015, Attribution License Abstract This thesis examines historical writing by drawing on the works of historians, philosophers, theorists and intellectuals, from antiquity to the contemporary moment. In order to answer the demand for scholarship that assembles insights of the Annales historians with other French intellectuals, I treat historians as theorists and theorists as historians. Through the course of my analysis, I examine issues of historical writing such as the scope of historical research and the historian’s task and place; I treat theoretical questions of constructivism, potentiality, agency, causality, teleology, and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Integration of Economic History Into Economics
    Cliometrica https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-018-0170-8 ORIGINAL PAPER The integration of economic history into economics Robert A. Margo1 Received: 28 June 2017 / Accepted: 16 January 2018 Ó Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract In the USA today the academic field of economic history is much closer to economics than it is to history in terms of professional behavior, a stylized fact that I call the ‘‘integration of economic history into economics.’’ I document this using two types of evidence—use of econometric language in articles appearing in academic journals of economic history and economics; and publication histories of successive cohorts of Ph.D.s in the first decade since receiving the doctorate. Over time, economic history became more like economics in its use of econometrics and in the likelihood of scholars publishing in economics, as opposed to, say, economic history journals. But the pace of change was slower in economic history than in labor economics, another subfield of economics that underwent profound intellec- tual change in the 1950s and 1960s, and there was also a structural break evident for post-2000 Ph.D. cohorts. To account for these features of the data, I sketch a simple, overlapping generations model of the academic labor market in which junior scholars have to convince senior scholars of the merits of their work in order to gain tenure. I argue that the early cliometricians—most notably, Robert Fogel and Douglass North—conceived of a scholarly identity for economic history that kept the field distinct from economics proper in various ways, until after 2000 when their influence had waned.
    [Show full text]