DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program Report Executive Office of the President Office of National Drug Control Policy High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program Report to Congress June 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ………………….……………………………. 1 Strategic Objectives…………...………..………………….………. 3 I. HIDTA Program Background Information …………........………..…...... 5 II. National HIDTA Program Evaluation ……….......…………….....…… 9 III. Assessment of Law Enforcement Intelligence Sharing in the HIDTA Program……. 13 IV. Assessment of Drug Enforcement Task Forces in HIDTAs…….....……....… 20 V. Individual HIDTA Reports 24 Appalachia ……………………………………….……..….. 27 Atlanta …………………………………………….……… 32 Central Florida ………………………………………………. 36 Central Valley California ………………………….………..…... 39 Chicago …………………………..…..….……………..…. 43 Gulf Coast ………………………………..………………... 47 Hawaii ………………………………………………..…... 52 Houston ………...………………………….…………..….. 58 Lake County ……….…………………….…………………. 64 Los Angeles …………..………………………………...…... 68 Michigan ……………..………………………..…..………. 74 Midwest …………………………...……….………...……. 78 Milwaukee ………………………………………...…...…... 85 Nevada …………………………………………...……...... 90 New England ……………………………………………….. 94 New York/New Jersey ……………………………...………….. 99 North Florida …………………………………...……..……. 106 North Texas ……………………………...……......………... 111 Northern California ……………………………...…….……… 116 Northwest ……………………………...…….........……….. 122 Ohio ……………………………...……............…………. 126 Oregon ……………………………...……............……….. 131 Philadelphia/Camden ……………………………...…………... 136 Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands ………………………………... 143 Rocky Mountain ……………………………...……………… 147 South Florida ……………………………...……....……....... 152 SWB - Arizona Region ……………………………...…….…… 156 SWB - California Region ……………………………...……..…. 162 SWB - New Mexico Region ……………………………………... 167 SWB - South Texas Region ……………………………………... 171 SWB - West Texas Region ……………………………………… 175 Washington/Baltimore …………………………………………. 179 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pursuant to the requirements of Section 707 of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) Reauthorization Act of 1998, as amended by Section 301 of the ONDCP Reauthorization Act of 2006, P.L. 109-469, ONDCP is providing Congress with this report on the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTAs). In order to present a national overview and individual HIDTA focus, this report provides background information and addresses three Congressional reporting requirements in one cohesive and coordinated document. This document is divided into an Executive Summary, Strategic Objectives, and five primary sections: 1. HIDTA Program Background Information The HIDTA program provides assistance to Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies operating in areas determined to be critical drug trafficking regions of the Nation. There are currently 28 regional HIDTAs which include approximately 16 percent of all counties in the United States and 60 percent of the population. HIDTA-designated counties are located in 45 states plus Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia. Through the HIDTA program, representatives of Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies in each HIDTA region coordinate and collaborate to address the specific drug threats of that region. 2. National HIDTA Program Evaluation This report provides Congress with an evaluation of HIDTA performance. ONDCP has established two goals for the HIDTA program which address program effectiveness, program efficiency, and program management. These goals also reflect the continued refinement of the process ONDCP has developed to manage and measure HIDTA performance. The first goal is to reduce drug availability by assisting Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies participating in HIDTAs to dismantle and disrupt drug trafficking organizations. The second goal is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of HIDTA initiatives. In order to report on their achievement of these goals, each HIDTA is required to provide the following four documents pertaining to its geographical area, on which its performance evaluation is based: 1) Threat Assessment; 2) Strategy; 3) Initiative Budget Proposals; and 4) Annual Report. 3. Assessment of Law Enforcement Intelligence Sharing in the HIDTA Program This report outlines the formal processes of the HIDTA program to assess law enforcement intelligence and information sharing, and highlights the formal evaluation and review process of the HIDTA program, including policy and budget guidance; FY 2009 funding levels for intelligence; processes for sharing Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement information; and the measures needed to achieve effective sharing of information. The HIDTA program has 57 operational intelligence and information sharing initiatives. Each HIDTA capitalizes on the combined resources of the Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement communities. The HIDTAs prepare and review threat assessments and apply the appropriate law enforcement response to combat illegal drug activity in our Nation. 1 4. Assessment of Drug Enforcement Task Forces in HIDTAs Regardless of the method of funding task forces (e.g., HIDTA, Justice Action Grant (JAG)/Byrne-sponsored), the 28 HIDTAs provide a coordination umbrella for Federal, state, local, and tribal drug law enforcement efforts; foster a strategy-driven systemic approach to integrate and synchronize efforts; facilitate efficiency, effectiveness, and cooperation among and between various agencies; and focus on outcomes and impacts. Using both formal and informal methods of coordination among drug enforcement task forces, the HIDTAs act as neutral centers to manage, deconflict, analyze, and report on drug enforcement activities in their respective regions. 5. Individual HIDTA Reports To address the specific reporting requirements, an analysis of each HIDTA is included in this report. These reports are succinct descriptions of the individual HIDTAs and their responses to the Congressional report requirements. For more comprehensive information on an individual HIDTA’s performance in addressing specific drug threats, ONDCP can provide, upon request, that HIDTA’s Annual Report, Strategy, or Threat Assessment. 2 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES This report demonstrates how the HIDTA program works to achieve the long-term goal of reducing drug trafficking and drug production in the United States by: (A) facilitating cooperation among Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies to share information and implement coordinated enforcement activities; (B) enhancing law enforcement intelligence sharing among Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies; (C) providing reliable law enforcement intelligence to law enforcement agencies needed to design effective enforcement strategies and operations; and, (D) supporting coordinated law enforcement strategies which maximize the use of available resources to reduce the supply of illegal drugs in designated areas and in the United States as a whole. ONDCP developed three specific strategic objectives in response to an analysis of the various components of this report. These strategic objectives, to be accomplished in FY 2011, include processes ONDCP either is currently undertaking or will soon undertake to achieve a more effective and efficient HIDTA program. Increase the Level of Participation in HIDTA Intelligence and Investigative Support Centers (IISCs)1 by Federal Agencies. • Surveying every HIDTA annually to determine the percentage of full-time agency participation in HIDTA IISCs. • Creating a headquarters-level interagency working group to assess Federal efforts to provide resources to HIDTA IISCs, and identify obstacles, and needed resources. • Encouraging increased participation and active engagement in IISCs by Federal agencies (DEA, FBI, ICE) through a series of focused meetings outlining the benefits of pooling resources and continuing to enhance the effectiveness of IISCs through integration with federal intelligence and investigative centers. Improve Information Flow and Collaboration Among HIDTAs and Non-HIDTA Task Forces. • Receive and disseminate recommendations and best practices from HIDTAs regarding the improvement of information flow and collaboration among HIDTA and non-HIDTA task forces. • Survey the HIDTAs to: o identify barriers o determine resource requirements to connect to the National Virtual Pointer System (NVPS).2 1 The Intelligence and Investigative Support Centers (IISCs) were previously known as Intelligence Support Centers (ISC) or Investigative Support Centers (ISC). 2 The NVPS was developed by the DEA, in partnership with the HIDTA program and the Regional Information Sharing Systems (RISS), to connect databases of participating Federal, state and local law enforcement agencies into a single automated system. Through NVPS, participating agencies have the capability to exchange target information through a single point of entry using a sensitive but unclassified secure network. It allows participating agencies to determine if any other law enforcement agency is investigating the same subject. 3 • Host strategy coordination meetings with HIDTAs on improving information flow among all drug enforcement task forces in their regions. Ensure HIDTA Investigative and Interdiction Initiatives Focus on Primary Drug Threats and are in Alignment with the National Drug Control Strategy and National goals. • Require all HIDTAs to establish and submit operational priorities in their annual Strategies, to include the identification of primary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Erie Watershed (Great Lakes Basin) Character Statement
    Lake Erie Watershed (Great Lakes Basin) Character Statement Lake Erie is the fourth largest of the Great Lakes in terms of water surface area (9,910 square miles) but the smallest by volume, containing only about 3% of the Great Lakes water. Lake Superior has over 50%, Lake Michigan has 21%, Lake Huron has 16%, and Lake Ontario has 9%. Water from the other Great Lakes reaches Lake Erie through the Detroit River and continues on to Lake Ontario through the Niagara River and Welland Canal. The total watershed is 30,140 square miles with only 511 square miles in Pennsylvania. Geology All of the Great Lakes experienced glaciation several times throughout the past. The force and power of these events led to the physical characteristics of the lakes including Lake Erie’s depth and size. Such events also defined the area’s geology and topography thus determining the groundwater resources. In PA, the Lake Erie watershed lies within two physiographic provinces. The area adjacent to the lake is located in the Eastern Lake Section of the Central Lowland Province and is situated over shale, sedimentary and sandstone bedrock. The upland area of the watershed is located in the Glaciated Pittsburgh Plateaus Section of the Appalachian Plateau Province. These provinces within the watershed are separated by an erosional scarp (a steep slope or cliff found at the margin of a flat or gently sloping area usually against the dip of the rocks) that is three to four miles from the lake and oriented in a southwest to northeast direction. Aquifers in both provinces benefit tremendously from the deposition of glacial drift – unconsolidated material from past glaciers.
    [Show full text]
  • Hello Pennsylvania
    Hello Pennsylvania A QUICK TOUR OF THE COMMONWEALTH There is much to be proud of in Pennsylvania. Magnificent land, steadfast citizens, lasting traditions, resilient spirit — and a system of government that has sustained Pennsylvania and the nation for over 300 years. Hello Pennsylvania is one of a series of booklets we at the House of Representatives have prepared to make our state and the everyday workings of our government more understandable to its citizens. As your representatives, this is both our responsibility and our pleasure. Copies of this booklet may be obtained from your State Representative or from: The Office of the Chief Clerk House of Representatives Room 129, Main Capitol Building Harrisburg, PA 17120-2220 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA • HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES a hello Pennsylv marvelous mix A PENNSYLVANIA PROFILE A Quick Tour of the If you wanted to draw a 7 NORTHERN TIER Hunting, fishing, hardwood, Commonwealth picture of Pennsylvania and agriculture The largest open space in the Three hundred years ago, it Chances are you studied the you would need some facts. northeastern United States, this region houses the Little Like the size of the state Grand Canyon and more deer, was known as Penn’s Woods Commonwealth of Pennsylvania bear, and trout than people. and the kind of land and Counties: Bradford, Cameron, (Penn’s Sylvania) – and in a classroom years ago – or as Clinton, Elk, Forest, Lycoming, waterways that mark its McKean, Potter, Sullivan, William Penn owned it all! No recently as yesterday. But few Susquehanna, Tioga, Wyoming surface. You might want of us have Pennsylvania facts at 1 COLONIAL PENNSYLVANIA 4 ANTHRACITE AREA 8 STEEL KINGDOM commoner in history, before or to show major industries Historic attractions, high-tech, Recreation, manufacturing, Manufacturing, coal, high-tech, If you’ve got a good ear, education, and banking and coal and banking since, personally possessed our fingertips.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting a Resiliency Plan in Place
    2018 VOLUME 24, NUMBER 6 THE COMMISSIONER PLANNING TOOLS | HISTORY | BEST PRACTICES | LAW communities to reevaluate the existing infrastructure, land-use patterns, and public facilities that could be affected by a catastrophic event, particularly a repeat event. An important factor for local, state, and regional governments to consider is a disaster’s economic impact on a com- munity. The faster an area recovers from the damage, the sooner businesses can reopen and begin the recovery period. Frequent disruptions in economic activity stemming from recurring events may indicate the need for a careful study of the area’s vulnerabilities. Bayshore Boulevard in Tampa experienced some flooding during Hurricane Michael The commissioner’s role in October, despite being more than 300 miles from landfall in Florida’s Panhandle. Commissioners have multiple tools at their disposal to aid in resiliency plan- ning. These tools range from local mitiga- Putting a Resiliency Plan in Place tion strategies, which can reduce or even eliminate risks, to capital improvement ECENT EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS have alerted planning commissioners all over plans that can identify needed projects the U.S.—and the world—to the need for resilience, a term that is becoming a key and options for financing them. R element of the planning vocabulary. In the wake of Hurricane Michael, the state Perhaps the most important tools of Florida is particularly sensitive to the threat of hazards. Hillsborough County, where are comprehensive plans and long-range I am the executive director of the city-county planning commission, is continually transportation plans. In 2015, the state taking steps toward greater resiliency.
    [Show full text]
  • BANKING on NATURE 2004: the Economic Benefits to Local Communities of National Wildlife Refuge Visitation
    BANKING ON NATURE 2004: The Economic Benefits to Local Communities of National Wildlife Refuge Visitation In a world where money counts, the land needs value to give it a voice. ─ Frances Cairncross, Costing the Earth James Caudill, Ph.D. and Erin Henderson Division of Economics U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC September 2005 Table of Contents Executive Summary......................................................................................................................... i Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Region 1.........................................................................................................................................13 Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge.............................................................................. 14 Bandon Marsh National Wildlife Refuge ............................................................................. 18 Columbia National Wildlife Refuge ..................................................................................... 22 Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge...................................................................................... 27 Grays Harbor National Wildlife Refuge............................................................................... 31 Guadalupe-Nipomo
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to State and Local Census Geography
    Guide to State and Local Census Geography Guide to State and Local Census Geography The first Guide to State and Local Census Geography (1990 CPH-I-18) was issued in June 1993 as a joint venture between the US Census Bureau and the Association of Public Data Users (APDU). The book contained an overview of census geography and had information about key geographic concepts for each state as it related to the 1990 Census. The US Census Bureau updated this publication based on geography for the 2010 Census and is making it available as a web publication. The format of this publication is similar to the 1993 publication in that it has information about the census geography of each state. This edition of the publication includes: Basic information about the state o 2010 Census Population o Land Area o Density o Capital o Date Became a State o Bordering States o International Borders History of the State o Includes information as to what censuses have data for this state American Indian Areas Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas and Related Statistical Areas Counties County Subdivisions Places Census Tracts/Block Groups/Blocks Congressional Districts School Districts State Legislative Districts Urban Areas ZIP Code Tabulation Areas Other Information of General Geographic Interest (select states) Historical Centers of Population Most Populous, Largest in Area, and Most Densely Populated Areas Lists of Entities Page | 1 http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/geoguide.html Guide to State and Local Census Geography Alabama .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Magazine
    THE WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL MAGAZINE Volume 57 October 1974 Number 4 JOHN NICHOLSON AND THE PENNSYLVANIA POPULATION COMPANY Robert D. Arbuckle Nicholson, 1757-1800, was an early Pennsylvania land spec- Johnulator, financier, and entrepreneur. While serving as comptroller- general of the state, 1782-1794, he was a major factor inhelping Penn- sylvania achieve financial solvency after the revolutionary war. In this capacity Nicholson created political alliances with those who stressed state rather than national sovereignty, and in the 1790s he was instru- mental inhelping to form the Democratic-Republican party. Nicholson was a friend of many prominent national and state political figures, such as Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Mifflin,Robert Morris, Aaron Burr, and Edmund Randolph. Inaddition to his political activities, Nicholson engaged in many entrepreneurial promotions. He and his partners were the major pri- vate purchasers of building lots in the Federal District (Washington. D.C.) in its infancy; he was a flour merchant and an ironmonger, helping to establish with John Haydn the first iron furnace west of the Allegheny Mountains, near present-day Uniontown; owned many lead, copper, silver, and coal mines; promoted inventors like John Fitch, James Rumsey, and Oliver Evans; managed and spon- sored internal improvement projects, such as the Philadelphia-Lancas- ter Turnpike and the Delaware and Schuylkill Canal ;and participated in many humanitarian activities, such as helping blacks inPhiladelphia. However, Nicholson's primary activity was land speculation. He Dr. Arbuckle is associate director of academic affairs and is an assistant professor of history at the Pennsylvania State University, New Kensington, Pa., campus. —Editor 354 ROBERT D.
    [Show full text]
  • Albright, Rebecca Gifford, "The Civil War Abercrombie, Gen
    A Major Robert Stobo, rev., 48, 389-91 rev. of Point of Empire :Conflict at the Abbott, John Charles, 48, 118 Forks of the Ohio, 53, 387-88 Abbott, WilliamD., 53, 9 Albree, Joseph (1850), 49, 171 Abbott, W. L. (1888), 48, 4 Albright, Rebecca Gifford, "The Civil War Abercrombie, Gen. James, 44, 108 ;45, 297 ; Career of Andrew Gregg Cur tin, Governor 46, 23, 251; 50, 99 of Pennsylvania," 47, 323-41; 48, 19-42, Aber's Creek (1758), 46, 52, 53 151-73 Abingdon, Earl of, 53, 109-10 Alcoholic consumption (1792-1823), 46, 349 Abolition Alcoholics, 46, 355 letter, 51, 77-79 Alcuin, Warren Co., 49, 314-16 Academy of Science and Art (Pgh.), 48, 60 Alden, Frank E., 48, 9 "Account Book of General John Neville," ed. Alden and Harlow (1896), 48, 9 by James H.Moon, 52, 345-60 Aldrich, Capt. C. S. (1864), 47, 235, 342 Acheson, David, 45, 38 Alexander, Eugene (1861), 49, 48 Acheson, Thomas, 45, 38 Alexander, Mary (c.1825), 49, 102 Acheson family, 45, 38 Alexander Hutchinson and Company (1895), Acorn, ship (1896), 48, 48 48, 291 Adams, Ida Bright (Mrs. Marcellin C.) Alexandria, Va. church history, 48, 2 CivilWar, 44, 107, 127; 45, 162, 241, 242, "The Civil War Letters of James Rush 244, 246, 250, 252; 46, 4, 11, 12, 14, Holmes," 44, 105-27 15, 270 Adams, John Quincy, 44, 238, 239; 47, 292 colonial, 44, 384, 392 Adams, Michael (1801), 49, 53 Alger, Horatio, 51, 287-88 Adams, Mrs. S. Jarvis, 44, 106 Aliquippa Incline Plane Company (1891), Adams, Sarah Jane, 44, 105-27 46, 328 Adams, Thomas, 46, 162 Allanowissica (1775), 47, 145, 152n Adams and Yernon, 48, 191 Allegheny Arsenal Additions to HSWP Collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County, Pa Cultural Heritage Plan
    ERIE COUNTY, PA CULTURAL HERITAGE PLAN A Component of the Erie County Comprehensive Plan FINAL: August 15, 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Appreciation is expressed to the following individuals who contributed to the content of this Plan, and also to those who will lead and participate in its successful implementation. This Erie County Cultural Heritage Plan is supported by a grant from the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, a state agency funded by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Additional funding was provided by Erie County, Preservation Erie, and the Erie Community Foundation. PLAN LEADERS AND FUNDING PARTNERS DECISION-MAKING BODIES Erie County Executive Kathy Dahlkemper Erie County Council Jay Breneman, Chairman Dr. Kyle Foust, Vice Chairman Edward T. DiMattio Kathy Fatica André R. Horton Fiore Leone Erie County Department of Planning Carol J. Loll Kathy Wyrosdick, Director John McGranor, Planning Program Administrator Erie County Planning Commission Ryan Anderson, Planning Support Will Rogers, Chair Charles Casey, Vice-Chair Preservation Erie Melinda Meyer, Chair Dr. Chris J. Magoc David Skellie CULTURAL HERITAGE PLAN TASK FORCE Sue Moyer Emily Beck, VisitErie Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office/ Linda Bolla, Erie Maritime Museum Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission Margarita Dangel, Sisters of Saint Joseph’s Neighborhood Bill Callahan, Western Pennsylvania Community Network East Preservation Coordinator Terri Dennison, PA Route 6 Alliance George Deutsch, Erie County Historical Society The Erie Community Foundation Anna Frantz, Our West Bayfront and Emerge 2040 Michael Glass, Erie Insurance Construction and Project Management Department Bridget Jeffery, Edinboro University Department of History, CONSULTING FIRM Politics, Languages, and Cultures Michael Largarticha, Impact Corry T&B Planning, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Survey of Moravian Lands in the Erie Triangle Translated and Edited by Paul A
    JACOB EYERLY'S JOURNAL, 1794: The Survey of Moravian Lands in the Erie Triangle Translated and edited by Paul A. W. Wallace understand the significance of Jacob Eyerly's journal of 1794 itis necessary to know not only why he undertook the journey, To'but also the dangers which confronted him on the way. The one calls for some familiarity with the Moravian mission to the Indians; the other, for a reminder of our country's border history during the months preceding Anthony Wayne's victory over the Miami Confederation at Fallen Timbers. One of the most hopeful experiments in race relations ever undertaken on this continent was the Moravian mission to the Dela- ware and Mahican Indians of Pennsylvania and Ohio during the latter part of the eighteenth century. In seeking to save these In- dians from the frustration and degradation brought upon them by the uprooting from their homelands which they had suffered at the hands of an aggressive white population, the Moravians used modern methods, placing education on an equal footing with evangelism. Their aim was not merely to win recruits for another world, but like the Good Samaritan to help people here and now. Without any parade of humiliating condescension, they set about revitalizing the Indian's total personality. They restored his morale by, among other things, teaching him how to meet the white man's furious (and, to the Indian mind, unsportsmanlike) competition without resorting to suicidal violence. The missionaries taught their charges to read and write, gave them some understanding of the white man's business methods, showed them improved ways of farming and cattle raising.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northwest Pennsylvania Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
    NORTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY The Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission REVISED: FALL 2016 0 The Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) contributes to effective economic development in the Northwest Pennsylvania region through a locally-based, regionally-driven economic development planning process. Simply put, the CEDS is a strategy driven plan for regional economic development. Regions must update their CEDS at least every five years to qualify for EDA assistance and is a prerequisite for designation by EDA as an Economic Development District. 1 Table of Contents I. Background ....................................................................................................... 2 a. Regional Location and Physical Characteristics .......................................... 2 b. Counties ...................................................................................................... 3 i. Clarion ............................................................................................ 4 ii. Crawford ........................................................................................ 5 iii. Erie ................................................................................................. 6 iv. Forest ............................................................................................. 7 v. Lawrence ........................................................................................ 8 vi. Mercer ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE CHATAUQUA.ERIE STORY B, Donald H
    ~1~,/NS ~)l c.JW. lqs~ kCL ").o8B THE CHATAUQUA.ERIE STORY B, Donald H. lent JOHN O. BOWMAN MAYVILL.~. NEW YORK JOIIIBWARD The paper read by Donald H. Kent at the 19D8 Annual Ueeting ot the Chautauqua County Historical Society is ot unusual interest because it is written by • maD who can be properly considered the expert, and the last word, on the early English and French History of North­ western Pennsylvania and Western New York. He was oorn in Erie in 1910, and, atter being graduated from Allegheny College in 1931 spent a few years in teaching History in Erie High Sohools and in Allegheny OoUlle. In 1937 he became associated with the PeDDlylvania Historical Commission and has spent his entire time witn them since that date, at present being the Chief of research and Publioation Division. He has written or edited some thirty books, pamphlets and articles on the early history of this section. He bas examined Canadian and other arohives, which may not have been available to our earlier historians, with the result that the following artiole oorrects quitl a tew errors in what we formerly considered the early history of this seotion. We feel he has performed a very distinot servioe in this 'conneotion and that we who are interested in the early history of this seotion are under real obligation to him. a. P. lr1p~ aiD I. Ith Street Irie, Plnnsylvania COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL AND MUSEUM COMMISSION STATE MUSEUM BUILDING HARRISBURG THE CllAUTAUQUA-EKJE STOIn by Donald H. Kent (A talk to the Chautauqua County Historical Society, A>gust 2, 1958 ) Chautauqua County, New York, and Erie Co'mty, Pennsyl­ venia, nay logically be considered a single region, so far as their early history is concerned, and they were equally important in the ~t~uggle of the Fre~ch ar.d the British for control of western ?ennsylvania and the Ohio Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • The Erie Triangle: the Final Link Between Philadelphia and the Great Lakes
    The Erie Triangle: The Final Link Between Philadelphia and the Great Lakes URING THE IMMEDIATE post-Revolutionary years, Pennsyl- vania government officials developed an almost fanatical zeal D to link the state and national capital, Philadelphia, with as large a hinterland as possible. The efforts of these officials in terms of economic goals were competitive with those of officials in New York and Maryland. Internal improvement schemes unfolded in Philadel- phia during the late 1780s and early 1790s. The planners proposed to develop canals on Pennsylvania's rivers, build roads across the state's Endless Mountains, attract produce into Pennsylvania from newly opening farm country in the rival states of New York and Maryland, and, ultimately, draw future products from the lower Great Lakes region through a "window on Lake Erie." The key objective of their last goal was to secure furs, other forest products, and agricultural products to the market center at Philadelphia. The "window on Lake Erie" was Presque Isle harbor in the Erie Triangle, a tract of federal land purchased on April 23, 1792, after a half decade of negotiations, by Pennsylvania officials from those representing the new Washington administration. (See Map 1.) This 202,187 acre addition to later Erie County had previously been claimed by four other states. The claims were turned over to the Confederation government between 1780 and 1785 as part of the general cession of western land claims by many of the original thirteen states. That Pennsylvania officials were interested in acquiring the Trian- gle is a matter of record. Less clear has been the reason for their interest.
    [Show full text]