DOCSLIB.ORG

Vesicular Transport in Cells – from Analysis to Biogenesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vesicular Transport in Cells – from Analysis to Biogenesis Powered by Website address: https://www.gesundheitsindustrie- bw.de/en/article/news/vesicular-transport-in-cells-from- analysis-to-biogenesis Vesicular transport in cells – from analysis to biogenesis COPI vesicles, one of the three major types of intracellular transport vesicles, are an excellent example of how the molecular analysis of individual vesicle components can lead to an understanding of the biogenesis and transport mechanisms of membrane vesicles as a whole. The research carried out by Dr. Felix T. Wieland’s team at the University of Heidelberg has made a decisive contribution to such detailed insights. Eukaryotic cells are characterised by complex membrane systems that separate different metabolic compartments from each other at the same time as transporting metabolic products and messenger substances to specific destinations inside the cell and into the extracellular space. The transport is mediated by vesicles that detach from the folded and branched cisternae of intracellular membranes. They either then fuse with intracellular membranes again or with the plasma membrane where the contents of the vesicles, secretory proteins for example, are discharged to the outside of the cell. This process is referred to as exocytosis. The opposite process is known as endocytosis, in which cells take up molecules from the exterior by enveloping them in their cell membrane before releasing them inside the cell. Camillo Golgi (1843-1926). © Universitá degli studi di Pavia The Golgi apparatus, named after the Italian physiologist Camillo Golgi who discovered a method to 1 stain nervous tissue with silver, which led to his discovery in 1898 of the "apparato reticulare interno" in the hippocampal neurons, is integral in modifying and packaging macromolecules for exocytosis or use within the cell (endocytosis). Camillo Golgi was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1906 for his work on the structure of the nervous system. However, the importance of the Golgi apparatus and the intracellular membrane system was recognised much later, in particular through the research of Albert Claude, Christian de Duve and George Palade (Nobel Prize 1974) and Günter Blobel (Nobel Prize 1999). Three types of transport containers The mechanism of intracellular vesicular transport has since turned out to be quite complex: molecules are transported into and outside of cells, a process for which different cargo containers are used. Three major types of transport vesicles have been analysed in detail on the molecular level, and are defined through the protein coats surrounding their membranes. The first type of transport vesicles known was the so-called “clathrin coated vesicles” (CVV), which bud into the cytoplasm (endocytosis) and also mediate the transport between the trans-Golgi network, plasma membrane, endosomes and lysosomes. The two other types of transport vesicles, which are known as COPI- and COPII vesicles (COP stands for ‘coat protein’), are responsible for intracellular cargo transport: COPII vesicles transport newly synthesised secretory and membrane-bound proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus, or more precisely, to the so-called ‘intermediate compartment’ located between the ER and the Golgi apparatus. COPI vesicles mediate the transport inside the Golgi apparatus, i.e. between the individual cisternae of the Golgi apparatus, as well as the retrograde transport of cargo from the cis-Golgi network to the ER. Vesicular transport in a cell involving endocytotic and exocytotic vesicles © Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 360-364 (2009) The group of researchers led by Prof. Dr. Felix T. Wieland at the Biochemistry Centre at the University of Heidelberg (BZH) has been carrying out an intensive investigation of the structure, function and 2 biogenesis of COPI vesicles. In cooperation with a group of researchers led by Prof. James E. Rothman (then at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, now at Yale University), Wieland’s team isolated and purified a quantity of COPI vesicles that was large enough to enable the chemical analysis of the COPI components. They made use of Rothman’s groundbreaking discovery that the isolated Golgi apparatus is able to form COPI vesicles in vitro [editor’s note: Ways to isolate the Golgi apparatus itself, using classical cell fractionation methods including ultracentrifugation in sugar density gradients, were developed as early as the end of the 1960s, amongst others by J. D. Morré at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, with the participation of the author of this article.] Wieland and his team showed that the COPI vesicles form at the Golgi apparatus by binding a soluble cytosolic coat protein, which forms a complex of seven subunits (COPs) that is referred to as coatomer. Genome sequencing revealed that two (gamma and zeta) of the seven subunits occur as isotypes. Different COP combinations lead to three coatomer isotypes, stoichiometrically composed of seven subunits, namely gamma1/zeta1, gamma1/zeta2 and gamma2/zeta1. These three coatomer complexes are located at different sites in the vesicular transport system and are thought to have different functions. Researchers were able to isolate vesicles containing the gamma2/zeta1 coatomer isotype from the other COPI vesicles. Biogenesis of COPI vesicles Prof. Dr. Felix T. Wieland, Heidelberg University Biochemistry Centre © University of Heidelberg Another cytosolic component required for the budding of COPI vesicles at the Golgi apparatus is the ADP ribosylation factor 1 (Arf1), a small GTP-binding protein. Stimulated by a membrane-bound GTPase-activating protein (GAP), GTP is hydrolysed to GDP by ARF during vesicle formation. The membrane also contains transmembrane proteins from the p24 protein family which act as coat receptors. The Heidelberg researchers have developed a detailed model on the step-wise budding of COPI vesicles from the Golgi membrane based on the molecular characteristics and the binding behaviour of the individual components. This model was tested in vitro in a liposomal system and, amongst other things, has been used to explain that coatomer is bound to the Golgi apparatus via ARF and p24 proteins. This leads to a conformational change of coatomer, which in turn leads to its polymerisation on the membrane and makes the membrane bend into a bud shape. It is assumed that the lipid composition of the membrane also plays a role in the formation of vesicles. 3 The lipids of the COPI vesicles It has been known for many decades that each cell organelle has a typical lipid composition. Since the organelles, for example ER and Golgi apparatus, are connected with each other by way of vesicular membrane transport, one could perhaps assume that the lipid composition of the transport vesicles corresponds to that of the donor or recipient membrane or to an intermediary pattern of the two. When the Heidelberg team analysed the lipids of the COPI vesicles and those of their donor membranes, i.e. the Golgi cisternae, they found that the vesicles had a sphingomyelin and cholesterol (two lipids that are found in very high concentrations in the plasma membrane) content that was considerably lower than that of the Golgi membranes. Transmission electron microscope image of a Golgi apparatus (composed of membrane-bound stacks of cisternae) and secretory vesicles. © Institute of Cell Biology, University of Freiburg The researchers were particularly surprised to find that the concentration of a certain sphingomyelin species, which contains the fatty acid stearic acid (18:0), was 12 times higher in COPI vesicles than in the Golgi membrane. The researchers concluded that the vesicular membrane proteins specifically interact with the lipids, which leads to their selection and sorting. Many questions relating to the biogenesis and the transport of COPI vesicles are of course not yet solved. In two projects funded by the DFG as part of the cooperative research centre "Dynamics of macromolecular complexes involved in biosynthetic transport" (SFB 638), Wieland is currently focusing on the "Dynamics of COPI assembly" (in cooperation with PD Dr. Britta Brügger from BZH) and the "Dynamics of coatomer structures" (in cooperation with Dr. John Briggs from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Heidelberg). Wieland is the spokesperson of the SFB 638 which went into its second funding period in January 2008. Further information: Prof. Dr. Felix Wieland Biochemistry Centre at the University of Heidelberg (BZH) E-mail: felix.wieland(at)bzh.uni-heidelberg.de PD Dr. Britta Brügger Biochemistry Centre at the University of Heidelberg (BZH) E-mail: britta.bruegger(at)bzh.uni-heidelberg.de 4 Article 12-Jul-2010 EJ BioRN © BIOPRO Baden-Württemberg GmbH The article is part of the following dossiers Membrane proteins 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RANDY SCHEKMAN Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA
    GENES AND PROTEINS THAT CONTROL THE SECRETORY PATHWAY Nobel Lecture, 7 December 2013 by RANDY SCHEKMAN Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA. Introduction George Palade shared the 1974 Nobel Prize with Albert Claude and Christian de Duve for their pioneering work in the characterization of organelles interrelated by the process of secretion in mammalian cells and tissues. These three scholars established the modern field of cell biology and the tools of cell fractionation and thin section transmission electron microscopy. It was Palade’s genius in particular that revealed the organization of the secretory pathway. He discovered the ribosome and showed that it was poised on the surface of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) where it engaged in the vectorial translocation of newly synthesized secretory polypeptides (1). And in a most elegant and technically challenging investigation, his group employed radioactive amino acids in a pulse-chase regimen to show by autoradiograpic exposure of thin sections on a photographic emulsion that secretory proteins progress in sequence from the ER through the Golgi apparatus into secretory granules, which then discharge their cargo by membrane fusion at the cell surface (1). He documented the role of vesicles as carriers of cargo between compartments and he formulated the hypothesis that membranes template their own production rather than form by a process of de novo biogenesis (1). As a university student I was ignorant of the important developments in cell biology; however, I learned of Palade’s work during my first year of graduate school in the Stanford biochemistry department.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Lez Concept of Synapses
    Synapse • Gaps Between Neurons A synapse is a specialised junction between 2 neurones where the nerve impulse is passed from one neuron to another Santiago Ramón Camillo Golgi y Cajal The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1906 was awarded jointly to Camillo Golgi and Santiago Ramón y Cajal "in recognition of their work on the structure of the nervous system Reticular vs Neuronal Doctrine The 1930 s and 1940s was a time of controversy between proponents of chemical and electrical theories of synaptic transmission. Henry Dale was a pharmacologist and a principal advocate of chemical transmission. His most prominent adversary was the neurophysiologist, JohnEccles. Otto Loewi, MD Nobel Laureate (1936) Types of Synapses • Synapses are divided into 2 groups based on zones of apposition: • Electrical • Chemical – Fast Chemical – Modulating (slow) Chemical Gap-junction Channels • Connect communicating cells at an electrical synapse • Consist of a pair of cylinders (connexons) – one in presynaptic cell, one in post – each cylinder made of 6 protein subunits – cylinders meet in the gap between the two cell membranes • Gap junctions serve to synchronize the activity of a set of neurons Electrical synapse Electrical Synapses • Common in invertebrate neurons involved with important reflex circuits. • Common in adult mammalian neurons, and in many other body tissues such as heart muscle cells. • Current generated by the action potential in pre-synaptic neuron flows through the gap junction channel into the next neuron • Send simple depolarizing
    [Show full text]
  • The Hippocampus Marion Wright* Et Al
    WikiJournal of Medicine, 2017, 4(1):3 doi: 10.15347/wjm/2017.003 Encyclopedic Review Article The Hippocampus Marion Wright* et al. Abstract The hippocampus (named after its resemblance to the seahorse, from the Greek ἱππόκαμπος, "seahorse" from ἵππος hippos, "horse" and κάμπος kampos, "sea monster") is a major component of the brains of humans and other vertebrates. Humans and other mammals have two hippocampi, one in each side of the brain. It belongs to the limbic system and plays important roles in the consolidation of information from short-term memory to long-term memory and spatial memory that enables navigation. The hippocampus is located under the cerebral cortex; (allocortical)[1][2][3] and in primates it is located in the medial temporal lobe, underneath the cortical surface. It con- tains two main interlocking parts: the hippocampus proper (also called Ammon's horn)[4] and the dentate gyrus. In Alzheimer's disease (and other forms of dementia), the hippocampus is one of the first regions of the brain to suffer damage; short-term memory loss and disorientation are included among the early symptoms. Damage to the hippocampus can also result from oxygen starvation (hypoxia), encephalitis, or medial temporal lobe epilepsy. People with extensive, bilateral hippocampal damage may experience anterograde amnesia (the inability to form and retain new memories). In rodents as model organisms, the hippocampus has been studied extensively as part of a brain system responsi- ble for spatial memory and navigation. Many neurons in the rat and mouse hippocampus respond as place cells: that is, they fire bursts of action potentials when the animal passes through a specific part of its environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Charles Sherrington'sthe Integrative Action of the Nervous System: a Centenary Appreciation
    doi:10.1093/brain/awm022 Brain (2007), 130, 887^894 OCCASIONAL PAPER Sir Charles Sherrington’sThe integrative action of the nervous system: a centenary appreciation Robert E. Burke Formerly Chief of the Laboratory of Neural Control, National Institute of Neurological Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA Present address: P.O. Box 1722, El Prado, NM 87529,USA E-mail: [email protected] In 1906 Sir Charles Sherrington published The Integrative Action of the Nervous System, which was a collection of ten lectures delivered two years before at Yale University in the United States. In this monograph Sherrington summarized two decades of painstaking experimental observations and his incisive interpretation of them. It settled the then-current debate between the ‘‘Reticular Theory’’ versus ‘‘Neuron Doctrine’’ ideas about the fundamental nature of the nervous system in mammals in favor of the latter, and it changed forever the way in which subsequent generations have viewed the organization of the central nervous system. Sherrington’s magnum opus contains basic concepts and even terminology that are now second nature to every student of the subject. This brief article reviews the historical context in which the book was written, summarizes its content, and considers its impact on Neurology and Neuroscience. Keywords: Neuron Doctrine; spinal reflexes; reflex coordination; control of movement; nervous system organization Introduction The first decade of the 20th century saw two momentous The Silliman lectures events for science. The year 1905 was Albert Einstein’s Sherrington’s 1906 monograph, published simultaneously in ‘miraculous year’ during which three of his most celebrated London, New Haven and New York, was based on a series papers in theoretical physics appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Great Ideas of Biology
    GREATGREAT IDEASIDEAS OFOF BIOLOGYBIOLOGY Paul Nurse KITP Public Lecture, Feb 24, 2010 THETHE CELLCELL The basic unit of life ROBERTROBERT HOOKEHOOKE’’SS MICROSCOPEMICROSCOPE Cork Image: Past Present STEMSTEM IMAGES:IMAGES: PASTPAST ANDAND PRESENTPRESENT Nehemiah Grew (1682) ANTONIANTONI VANVAN LEEUWENHOEKLEEUWENHOEK MICROORGANISMSMICROORGANISMS VANVAN LEEUWENHOEK?LEEUWENHOEK? THEODORTHEODOR SCHWANNSCHWANN “We have seen that all organisms are composed of essentially like parts, namely, of cells.” (1839) RUDOLFRUDOLF VIRCHOWVIRCHOW “Every animal appears as a sum of vital units, each of which bears in itself the complete characteristics of life.” (1858) CELLCELL Rockefeller Nobel Prize Winners in Cell Biology George E. Palade (1974) Christian de Duve (1974) Albert Claude (1974) Günter Blobel (1999) MAMMALIANMAMMALIAN EMBRYOEMBRYO SPERMSPERM ANDAND EGGEGG THETHE CELLCELL The basic unit of life Underpins all reproduction and development Stem cells THETHE GENEGENE Basis of heredity GREGORGREGOR MENDELMENDEL MENDELMENDEL’’SS GARDENGARDEN PEASPEAS PEASPEAS 1919TH CENTURYCENTURY CHROMOSOMESCHROMOSOMES EDOUARDEDOUARD VANVAN BENEDENBENEDEN’’SS NEMATODENEMATODE CHROMOSOMESCHROMOSOMES PNEUMOCOCCUSPNEUMOCOCCUS Avery, MacLeod and McCarty, Rockefeller University (1944) DNADNA MOLECULEMOLECULE CENTRALCENTRAL DOGMADOGMA THETHE GENEGENE Basis of heredity Genotype to phenotype Implications for what we are EVOLUTIONEVOLUTION BYBY NATURALNATURAL SELECTIONSELECTION Life evolves Mechanism of natural selection ERASMUSERASMUS ANDAND CHARLESCHARLES DARWINDARWIN
    [Show full text]
  • George Palade 1912-2008
    George Palade, 1912-2008 Biography George Palade was born in November, 1912 in Jassy, Romania to an academic family. He graduated from the School of Medicine of the The Founding of Cell Biology University of Bucharest in 1940. His doctorial thesis, however, was on the microscopic anatomy of the cetacean delphinus Delphi. He The discipline of Cell Biology arose at Rockefeller University in the late practiced medicine in the second world war, and for a brief time af- 1940s and the 1950s, based on two complimentary techniques: cell frac- terwards before coming to the USA in 1946, where he met Albert tionation, pioneered by Albert Claude, George Palade, and Christian de Claude. Excited by the potential of the electron microscope, he Duve, and biological electron microscopy, pioneered by Keith Porter, joined the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, where he did Albert Claude, and George Palade. For the first time, it became possible his seminal work. He left Rockefeller in 1973 to chair the new De- to identify the components of the cell both structurally and biochemi- partment of Cell Biology at Yale, and then in 1990 he moved to the cally, and therefore begin understanding the functioning of cells on a University of California, San Diego as Dean for Scientific Affairs at molecular level. These individuals participated in establishing the Jour- the School of Medicine. He retired in 2001, at age 88. His first wife, nal of Cell Biology, (originally the Journal of Biochemical and Biophysi- Irina Malaxa, died in 1969, and in 1970 he married Marilyn Farquhar, cal Cytology), which later led, in 1960, to the organization of the Ameri- another prominent cell biologist, and his scientific collaborator.
    [Show full text]
  • Cajal, Golgi, Nansen, Schäfer and the Neuron Doctrine
    Full text provided by www.sciencedirect.com Feature Endeavour Vol. 37 No. 4 Cajal, Golgi, Nansen, Scha¨ fer and the Neuron Doctrine 1, Ortwin Bock * 1 Park Road, Rosebank, 7700 Cape Town, South Africa The Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine of 1906 was interconnected with each other as well as connected with shared by the Italian Camillo Golgi and the Spaniard the radial bundle, whereby a coarsely meshed network of Santiago Ramo´ n y Cajal for their contributions to the medullated fibres is produced which can already be seen at 2 knowledge of the micro-anatomy of the central nervous 60 times magnification’. Gerlach’s work on vertebrates system. In his Nobel Lecture, Golgi defended the going- helped to consolidate the evolving Reticular Theory which out-of-favour Reticular Theory, which stated that the postulated that all the cells of the central nervous system nerve cells – or neurons – are fused together to form a were joined together like an electricity distribution net- diffuse network. Reticularists like Golgi insisted that the work. Gerlach was one of the most influential anatomists of axons physically join one nerve cell to another. In con- his day and the author of many books, not least the 1848 trast, Cajal in his lecture said that his own studies Handbuch der Allgemeinen und Speciellen Gewebelehre des confirmed the observations of others that the neurons Menschlichen Ko¨rpers: fu¨ r Aerzte und Studirende. For are independent of one another, a fact which is the twenty years he lent his considerable credibility to the anatomical basis of the now-accepted Neuron Doctrine Reticular Theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Design in Physics and Biology: from the Origin of the Universe to the Origin of Life
    52 stephen c. meyer Pages 53–111 of Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe. The Proceedings of the Wethersfield Institute. Michael Behe, STEPHEN C. MEYER William A. Dembski, and Stephen C. Meyer (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2001. 2000 Homeland Foundation.) EVIDENCE FOR DESIGN IN PHYSICS AND BIOLOGY: FROM THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE TO THE ORIGIN OF LIFE 1. Introduction In the preceding essay, mathematician and probability theo- rist William Dembski notes that human beings often detect the prior activity of rational agents in the effects they leave behind.¹ Archaeologists assume, for example, that rational agents pro- duced the inscriptions on the Rosetta Stone; insurance fraud investigators detect certain ‘‘cheating patterns’’ that suggest intentional manipulation of circumstances rather than ‘‘natu- ral’’ disasters; and cryptographers distinguish between random signals and those that carry encoded messages. More importantly, Dembski’s work establishes the criteria by which we can recognize the effects of rational agents and distinguish them from the effects of natural causes. In brief, he shows that systems or sequences that are both ‘‘highly com- plex’’ (or very improbable) and ‘‘specified’’ are always produced by intelligent agents rather than by chance and/or physical- chemical laws. Complex sequences exhibit an irregular and improbable arrangement that defies expression by a simple formula or algorithm. A specification, on the other hand, is a match or correspondence between an event or object and an independently given pattern or set of functional requirements. As an illustration of the concepts of complexity and speci- fication, consider the following three sets of symbols: 53 54 stephen c.
    [Show full text]
  • Balcomk41251.Pdf (558.9Kb)
    Copyright by Karen Suzanne Balcom 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Karen Suzanne Balcom Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine Committee: E. Glynn Harmon, Supervisor Julie Hallmark Billie Grace Herring James D. Legler Brooke E. Sheldon Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine by Karen Suzanne Balcom, B.A., M.L.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2005 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my first teachers: my father, George Sheldon Balcom, who passed away before this task was begun, and to my mother, Marian Dyer Balcom, who passed away before it was completed. I also dedicate it to my dissertation committee members: Drs. Billie Grace Herring, Brooke Sheldon, Julie Hallmark and to my supervisor, Dr. Glynn Harmon. They were all teachers, mentors, and friends who lifted me up when I was down. Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my committee: Julie Hallmark, Billie Grace Herring, Jim Legler, M.D., Brooke E. Sheldon, and Glynn Harmon for their encouragement, patience and support during the nine years that this investigation was a work in progress. I could not have had a better committee. They are my enduring friends and I hope I prove worthy of the faith they have always showed in me. I am grateful to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • E Neurobiology of Learning and Memory – As Related in the Memoirs of Eric R
    www.surgicalneurologyint.com Surgical Neurology International Editor-in-Chief: Nancy E. Epstein, MD, Clinical Professor of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, State U. of NY at Stony Brook. SNI: Socioeconomics, Politics, and Medicine Editor James A Ausman, MD, PhD University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA Open Access Book Review e neurobiology of learning and memory – as related in the memoirs of Eric R. Kandel Miguel A. Faria Clinical Professor of Surgery (Neurosurgery, ret.) and Adjunct Professor of Medical History (ret.), Mercer University School of Medicine, United States. E-mail: *Miguel A. Faria - [email protected] Author : Eric R. Kandel Published by : W.W. Norton & Co., New York, NY, USA Price : $19.95 ISBN-13 : 978-0393329377 ISBN-10 : 9780393329377 Year : 2006 *Corresponding author: Miguel A. Faria, MD Clinical Professor of Surgery (Neurosurgery, ret.) and Adjunct Professor of Medical History (ret.), Mercer University School of Medicine, United States. [email protected] is magnificent tome by Eric R. Kandel, M.D., a psychoanalyst and neuroscience researcher, Received : 22 July 2020 is both a delightful autobiography and a scrupulously detailed history of the neurobiology of Accepted : 22 July 2020 learning and memory, a relatively new area of neuroscience that Kandel refers to as a “new [7] Published : 15 August 2020 science of mind.” His own fundamental work in this area made him a recipient of a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2000, which he shared with two other distinguished investigators, DOI Drs. Arvid Carlsson (for elucidating the effects of dopamine in Parkinson’s disease) and Paul 10.25259/SNI_458_2020 Greengard (for the discovery of signal transduction in neurons).
    [Show full text]
  • Guest Editorial 1 Guest Editorial
    Indian JJ PhysiolPhysiol PharmacolPharmacol 2012; 2012; 56(1) 56(1) : 1–6 Guest Editorial 1 Guest Editorial IMMUNOLOGY AND NOBEL PRIZE : A LOVE STORY Several breakthroughs revealing the way in which our bodies protect us against microscopic threats of almost any description have been duly acknowledged by the Nobel Prizes in Physiology or Medicine. Interestingly, Nobel Prizes in Physiology or Medicine including the latest one, for the year 2011, has been awarded for twelve times to the field of Immunology. The story began in 1901 with the very first Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine - it was awarded to Emil Von Behring for his pioneering work which resulted in the discovery of antitoxins, later termed as antibodies. Working with Shibasaburo Kitasato, Von Behring found that when animals were injected with tiny doses of weakened forms of tetanus or diphtheria bacteria, their blood extracts contained chemicals released in response, which rendered the pathogens’ toxins harmless. Naming these chemical agents ‘antitoxins’, Von Behring and Erich Wernicke showed that transferring antitoxin-containing blood serum into animals infected with the fully virulent versions of diphtheria bacteria cured the recipients of any symptoms, and prevented death. This was found to be true for humans also; and thus Von Behring’s method of treatment – passive serum therapy – became an essential remedy for diphtheria, saving many thousands of lives every year. Shortly after this, the very first explanation about the mechanisms of immune system’s functioning was proposed which paved way for extensive research in immunology till today. Paul Ehrlich had hit upon the key concept of how antibodies seek and neutralize the toxic actions of bacteria, while Ilya Mechnikov had discovered that certain body cells could destroy pathogens by simply engulfing or “eating” them.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates
    The Rockefeller University » Nobel Laureates Sunday, December 15, 2013 Calendar Directory Employment DONATE AWARDS & HONORS University Overview & Nobel Laureates Quick Facts History Since the institution's founding in 1901, 24 Nobel Prize winners have been associated with the university. Of these, two Faculty Awards are Rockefeller graduates (Edelman and Baltimore) and six laureates are current members of the Rockefeller faculty (Günter Blobel, Christian de Duve, Paul Greengard, Roderick MacKinnon, Paul Nurse and Torsten Wiesel). Nobel Prize Albert Lasker Awards Ralph M. Roderick Paul Nurse National Medal of Science Steinman MacKinnon 2001 Institute of Medicine 2011 2003 Physiology or National Academy of Physiology or Chemistry Medicine Sciences Medicine Gairdner Foundation International Award Campus Map & Views Travel Directions Paul Günter R. Bruce NYC Resources Greengard Blobel Merrifield Office of the President 2000 1999 1984 Physiology or Physiology or Chemistry Chief of Staff Medicine Medicine Board of Trustees and Corporate Officers Sustainability Torsten N. David Albert Contact Wiesel Baltimore Claude 1981 1975 1974 Physiology or Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Medicine Christian George E. Stanford de Duve Palade Moore 1974 1974 1972 Physiology or Physiology or Chemistry Medicine Medicine William H. Gerald M. H. Keffer Stein Edelman Hartline 1972 1972 1967 Chemistry Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Peyton Joshua Edward L. Rous Lederberg Tatum 1966 1958 1958 http://www.rockefeller.edu/about/awards/nobel/[2013/12/16 7:42:49] The Rockefeller University » Nobel Laureates Physiology or Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Medicine Fritz A. John H. Wendell Lipmann Northrop M. Stanley 1953 1946 1946 Physiology or Chemistry Chemistry Medicine Herbert S.
    [Show full text]