DOCSLIB.ORG

ESA's Data Management System for the Russian Segment of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ESA's Data Management System for the Russian Segment of The iss data management system ESA’s Data Management System for the Russian Segment of the International Space Station J. Graf, C. Reimers & A. Errington ESA Directorate of Manned Spaceflight and Microgravity, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Role of the Data Management System It will also provide overall guidance and The first modules of the International Space navigation for the entire station. Station (ISS) will be the Functional Cargo Block (FGB, built by Russia and financed by NASA), Overall DMS-R Configuration NASA’s Node 1 and the Russian Service The Data Management System architecture of Module. As the Service Module has to be the Russian Segment and its interfaces with the autonomous from the beginning of its orbital overall International Space Station is shown life, it carries its own Data Management System in Figure 1. Ten MIL-STD buses provide the (DMS-R). interconnectivity between the various elements and equipment. The ESA-provided Service In October 1997, two flight units of the Data Management System Module onboard units are: (DMS-R) for the Service Module of the Russian Segment of the – Two Fault Tolerant Computers (Figure 2): a International Space Station were handed over by ESA to the Russian Control Computer and a Terminal Computer. Space Agency (RKA) for use by RSC Energia, the prime contractor for – Two Control Posts (Figures 3 and 4) for the Service Module and the entire Russian Segment. The Data command and control by the crew via the Management System was developed and manufactured in Europe by DMS-R, and for commanding experiments an industrial team led by Daimler-Benz Aerospace (DASA) in Bremen, and the European Robotic Arm (ERA), which Germany, under a contract placed by ESA’s Directorate of Manned is also being developed by ESA under a Spaceflight and Microgravity in Noordwijk, The Netherlands. The cooperative arrangement. project is governed by a cooperative agreement between ESA and RKA. A more detailed block diagram of the Service Module Data Management System is shown in This is the first delivery of ESA flight hardware within the International Figure 5. The Control Computer and Terminal Space Station Programme to another International Partner. It will be Computer have built-in redundancy to provide launched with the station’s third assembly flight, in December 1998. the required failure tolerance. The Control Posts can be configured to execute different, dedicated tasks or to operate in redundancy Ultimately, the Data Management System will mode. not only control the module itself, but also perform overall control, mission and failure The application software for the onboard management of the entire Russian Segment, computers is being developed by the Russian such as: Service Module contractor, RSC Energia, using – system and subsystem control, especially an ESA-provided Ground System, which guidance, navigation and control provides the hardware and software – mission management and supervisory environment to support software design, control by ground and crew development, simulation, test and validation. – management of onboard tasks and failure It is also being used to integrate hardware and recovery software into the Service Module Flight Model. – time distribution, time tagging and synchronisation Principles and implementation of failure – data acquisition and control for onboard tolerance systems and experiments The Control Computer and the Terminal – exchange of data and commands with the Computer feature a fault-masking architecture other parts of the station and are single-failure tolerant. r bulletin 93 — february 1998 bull Fault masking is achieved by majority voting deadlock situation have been verified through following parallel execution of the application many millions of simulation runs. The programs in three identical computer units. simulations and design analysis were These units are called Fault Containment performed by an independent team at the Regions. For this voting process, the Fault University of Bremen, Germany. Containment Regions must receive identical, synchronised input values in order to be able to For the Russian Service Module, the required deliver identical output values. configuration for the Fault Tolerant Computer consists of three Fault Containment Regions, Because of potential errors in data distribution, which provide masking of one deterministic some distribution rules have to be considered. fault. These are defined by the ‘Byzantine Theory’, which specifies the required number of Fault Associated ground system Containment Regions, individual data links and The DMS-R onboard equipment is comple- data distribution rounds, depending on the mented by a set of ground hardware and number of failures to be recovered. software for the application software development and verification process, as well As a result, a Byzantine Fault Tolerant as for system integration and check-out. The Computer system consists of multiple Fault Ground System is based on the Columbus Containment Regions cross-strapped by Ground Software, developed by DASA for multiple high-speed point-to-point data links. ESA’s Columbus Orbital Facility, one of Europe’s main contributions to the International In order to survive F simultaneous faults, the Space Station. The Columbus Ground system must meet the following requirements Software is a consistent set of software (according to Lamport, Shostak and Pease, products that forms the basis for a ‘The Byzantine General’s Problem’): comprehensive set of integrated ground facilities. It is also in use at NASA for the Space – the system must consist of 3F+1 Fault Station Mission Build Facility and the System Containment Regions Verification Facility. – the Fault Containment Regions must be interconnected through 2F+1 individual The Ground Segment consists of three main paths facilities: – the inputs must be exchanged F+1 times between the Fault Containment Regions 1. The Software Design and Development – the Fault Containment Regions must be Facility synchronised. 2. The Software Integration and Test Environment For data distribution, electrically-isolated full 3. The Test Facility with the necessary Electrical duplex serial data links are used to avoid error Ground Support Equipment and onboard propagation between the Fault Containment DMS engineering models for system-level Regions. The realisation of an individual data software integration. This facility is also path must be a point-to-point connection. connected to the Functional Cargo Block Keeping in mind the data throughput, which is (FGB) ground facility, provided by NASA to reduced by the required data distribution support integrated Service Module/FGB/ rounds, these data links must have very high Node/Shuttle interface verification testing. transmission rates. ESA and Russia: the cooperative This DMS-R development is the first time that experience the Byzantine Theory on failure tolerance has A challenging aspect of DMS-R development been realised for a space application. was working within two contrasting engineering cultures. A number of important differences in One of the most critical problems in the design approach became evident early on, while some of synchronised computer systems is the were not fully appreciated at the time. elimination of deadlock situations, where one software task is waiting for an event or data The old ‘Soviet’ approach to spacecraft coming from another software task, which itself development, like other activities of key is waiting for events or data from the first. In importance to the former Soviet Union, was to order to avoid such situations, all com- assign abundant resources within the prime munication paths in the software have been contractor and its various subcontractors, all modelled by an abstraction method in order to under the overall responsibility of the General reflect all related vectors and variables. The Designer, who had almost absolute power to integrity of the design and the absence of any accomplish the required task. iss data management system The development itself was driven mainly by History of European/Russian Cooperation on DMS design ideas rather than by detailed functional and interface requirements. It required very The project goes back to 1992, when discussions were initiated between close cooperation between individual Russia and Europe on potential ESA contributions to the planned Mir-2 designers, plus repeated iterations and station. One candidate was the Data Management System. However, the intermediate breadboarding of individual design political climate evolved very rapidly and the International Space Station, elements until the desired overall performance built and operated under multi-national cooperation, replaced the separate was achieved. This approach meant that Freedom and Mir-2 programmes. The European/Russian DMS was also functional and interface requirements of the confirmed for the new Space Station scenario and fully endorsed by NASA. individual design elements could change significantly during the design process, but it DMS development was formalised in an ESA/RKA Arrangement, signed on offered performance improvements and 1 March 1996, which defined ESA’s DMS obligations and RKA’s obligations, optimisation during development. Document- in exchange, to design and deliver to ESA the Russian Docking System for ation was limited to essential high-level ESA’s Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV). The ATV, launched by Ariane-5, will requirements, as all detailed information was support ISS resupply. open to change anyway. On 10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ORION ORION a to Z APOGEE to Break the Frangible Joints and Separate the Fairings, Three Parachutes
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration ORION www.nasa.gov ORION A to Z APOGEE to break the frangible joints and separate the fairings, three parachutes. The next two parachutes will then VAN ALLEN RADIATION BELTS The term apogee refers to the point in an elliptical exposing the spacecraft to space. LAS - LAUNCH ABORT SYSTEM deploy and open. Once the spacecraft slows to around The Van Allen Belts are belts of plasma trapped by orbit when a spacecraft is farthest from the Earth. Orion’s Launch Abort System (LAS) is designed to 100 mph, the three main parachutes will then deploy the Earth’s magnetic field that shield the surface of During Exploration Flight Test-1, Orion’s flight path will GUPPY propel the crew module away from an emergency on using three pilot parachutes and slow the spacecraft the Earth from much of the radiation in space. During take it to an apogee of 3,600 miles. Just how high is The Super Guppy is a special airplane capable of the launch pad or during initial takeoff, moving the to around 20 mph for splashdown in the Pacific Ocean. Exploration Flight Test-1, Orion will pass within the Van that? A commercial airliner flies about 8 miles above transporting up to 26 tons in its cargo compartment crew away from danger. Orion’s LAS has three new When fully deployed, the canopies of three main Allen Radiation Belts and will spend more time in the the Earth’s surface, so Orion’s flight is 450 times farther measuring 25 feet tall, 25 feet wide, and 111 feet long.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orbital-Hub: Low Cost Platform for Human Spaceflight After ISS
    67th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Guadalajara, Mexico, 26-30 September 2016. Copyright ©2016 by the International Astronautical Federation (IAF). All rights reserved. IAC-16, B3,1,9,x32622 The Orbital-Hub: Low Cost Platform for Human Spaceflight after ISS O. Romberga, D. Quantiusa, C. Philpota, S. Jahnkea, W. Seboldta, H. Dittusb, S. Baerwaldeb, H. Schlegelc, M. Goldd, G. Zamkad, R. da Costae, I. Retate, R. Wohlgemuthe, M. Langee a German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Space Systems, Bremen, Germany, [email protected] b German Aerospace Center (DLR), Executive Board, Space Research and Technology, Cologne, Germany, c European Space Agency (ESA) Contractor, Johnson Space Center, Houston, USA, d Bigelow Aerospace, Las Vegas / Washington, USA, e Airbus DS, Bremen, Germany Abstract The International Space Station ISS demonstrates long-term international cooperation between many partner governments as well as significant engineering and programmatic achievement mostly as a compromise of budget, politics, administration and technological feasibility. A paradigm shift to use the ISS more as an Earth observation platform and to more innovation and risk acceptance can be observed in the development of new markets by shifting responsibilities to private entities and broadening research disciplines, demanding faster access by users and including new launcher and experiment facilitator companies. A review of worldwide activities shows that all spacefaring nations are developing their individual programmes for the time after ISS. All partners are basically still interested in LEO and human spaceflight as discussed by the ISECG. ISS follow-on activities should comprise clear scientific and technological objectives combined with the long term view on space exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Session II-A - Energy Block of International Space Station "Alpha"
    1995 (32nd) People and Technology - The Case The Space Congress® Proceedings For Space Apr 26th, 2:00 PM - 5:00 PM Paper Session II-A - Energy Block of International Space Station "Alpha" Anatoli I. Kiselev General Director Khrunichev, SRPSC Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Kiselev, Anatoli I., "Paper Session II-A - Energy Block of International Space Station "Alpha"" (1995). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 28. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1995-32nd/april-26-1995/28 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENERGY BLOCK OF INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION "ALPHA" Ana10Ji I.Kisclev - General Director K.hrunichcv SRPSC Anatoli i.Nedaivoda - General Designer Valdimir K.Karra.sk - Professor, Design Center Director The international space station "Alpha" consists of the American, Rus­ sian, European and Japanese segments. Its integration in the orbit will take place in November, 1997 starting from the injection of 20-tonn erergy block on the basis of the unified functional c.argo blade (russian abbr1.. "' iation as EFGB) by means of the "Proton" LY. The EFG B is designed by the KHRUNICHEV State Research and Production Space Center (KSRPSC) The orbit hight with the inclination of 51.6 deg for EFGB is so selected thett by the end of December, 1997 it can be decreased upto the hight (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Rex D. Hall and David J. Shayler
    Rex D. Hall and David J. Shayler Soyuz A Universal Spacecraft ruuiiMicPublishedu 11in1 aaaundiiuiassociationi witwimh ^^ • Springer Praxis Publishing PRHB Chichester, UK "^UF Table of contents Foreword xvii Authors' preface xix Acknowledgements xxi List of illustrations and tables xxiii Prologue xxix ORIGINS 1 Soviet manned spaceflight after Vostok 1 Design requirements 1 Sever and the 1L: the genesis of Soyuz 3 The Vostok 7/1L Soyuz Complex 4 The mission sequence of the early Soyuz Complex 6 The Soyuz 7K complex 7 Soyuz 7K (Soyuz A) design features 8 The American General Electric concept 10 Soyuz 9K and Soyuz 1 IK 11 The Soyuz Complex mission profile 12 Contracts, funding and schedules 13 Soyuz to the Moon 14 A redirection for Soyuz 14 The N1/L3 lunar landing mission profile 15 Exploring the potential of Soyuz 16 Soyuz 7K-P: a piloted anti-satellite interceptor 16 Soyuz 7K-R: a piloted reconnaissance space station 17 Soyuz VI: the military research spacecraft Zvezda 18 Adapting Soyuz for lunar missions 20 Spacecraft design changes 21 Crewing for circumlunar missions 22 The Zond missions 23 The end of the Soviet lunar programme 33 The lunar orbit module (7K-LOK) 33 viii Table of contents A change of direction 35 References 35 MISSION HARDWARE AND SUPPORT 39 Hardware and systems 39 Crew positions 40 The spacecraft 41 The Propulsion Module (PM) 41 The Descent Module (DM) 41 The Orbital Module (OM) 44 Pyrotechnic devices 45 Spacecraft sub-systems 46 Rendezvous, docking and transfer 47 Electrical power 53 Thermal control 54 Life support 54
    [Show full text]
  • Space Rescue Ensuring the Safety of Manned Space¯Ight David J
    Space Rescue Ensuring the Safety of Manned Space¯ight David J. Shayler Space Rescue Ensuring the Safety of Manned Spaceflight Published in association with Praxis Publishing Chichester, UK David J. Shayler Astronautical Historian Astro Info Service Halesowen West Midlands UK Front cover illustrations: (Main image) Early artist's impression of the land recovery of the Crew Exploration Vehicle. (Inset) Artist's impression of a launch abort test for the CEV under the Constellation Program. Back cover illustrations: (Left) Airborne drop test of a Crew Rescue Vehicle proposed for ISS. (Center) Water egress training for Shuttle astronauts. (Right) Beach abort test of a Launch Escape System. SPRINGER±PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason, B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D. ISBN 978-0-387-69905-9 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2008934752 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. # Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2009 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci®c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • The New American Space Age: a Progress Report on Human Spaceflight the New American Space Age: a Progress Report on Human Spaceflight the International Space
    The New American Space Age: A PROGRESS REPORT ON HUMAN SpaCEFLIGHT The New American Space Age: A Progress Report on Human Spaceflight The International Space Station: the largest international scientific and engineering achievement in human history. The New American Space Age: A Progress Report on Human Spaceflight Lately, it seems the public cannot get enough of space! The recent hit movie “Gravity” not only won 7 Academy Awards – it was a runaway box office success, no doubt inspiring young future scientists, engineers and mathematicians just as “2001: A Space Odyssey” did more than 40 years ago. “Cosmos,” a PBS series on the origins of the universe from the 1980s, has been updated to include the latest discoveries – and funded by a major television network in primetime. And let’s not forget the terrific online videos of science experiments from former International Space Station Commander Chris Hadfield that were viewed by millions of people online. Clearly, the American public is eager to carry the torch of space exploration again. Thankfully, NASA and the space industry are building a host of new vehicles that will do just that. American industry is hard at work developing new commercial transportation services to suborbital altitudes and even low Earth orbit. NASA and the space industry are also building vehicles to take astronauts beyond low Earth orbit for the first time since the Apollo program. Meanwhile, in the U.S. National Lab on the space station, unprecedented research in zero-g is paving the way for Earth breakthroughs in genetics, gerontology, new vaccines and much more.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Greatest Projects and Their Engineers - VII
    America's Greatest Projects and Their Engineers - VII Course No: B05-005 Credit: 5 PDH Dominic Perrotta, P.E. Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 22 Stonewall Court Woodcliff Lake, NJ 076 77 P: (877) 322-5800 [email protected] America’s Greatest Projects & Their Engineers-Vol. VII The Apollo Project-Part 1 Preparing for Space Travel to the Moon Table of Contents I. Tragedy and Death Before the First Apollo Flight A. The Three Lives that Were Lost B. Investigation, Findings & Recommendations II. Beginning of the Man on the Moon Concept A. Plans to Land on the Moon B. Design Considerations and Decisions 1. Rockets – Launch Vehicles 2. Command/Service Module 3. Lunar Module III. NASA’s Objectives A. Unmanned Missions B. Manned Missions IV. Early Missions V. Apollo 7 Ready – First Manned Apollo Mission VI. Apollo 8 - Orbiting the Moon 1 I. Tragedy and Death Before the First Apollo Flight Everything seemed to be going well for the Apollo Project, the third in a series of space projects by the United States intended to place an American astronaut on the Moon before the end of the 1960’s decade. Apollo 1, known at that time as AS (Apollo Saturn)-204 would be the first manned spaceflight of the Apollo program, and would launch a few months after the flight of Gemini 12, which had occurred on 11 November 1966. Although Gemini 12 was a short duration flight, Pilot Buzz Aldrin had performed three extensive EVA’s (Extra Vehicular Activities), proving that Astronauts could work for long periods of time outside the spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • A Call for a New Human Missions Cost Model
    A Call For A New Human Missions Cost Model NASA 2019 Cost and Schedule Analysis Symposium NASA Johnson Space Center, August 13-15, 2019 Joseph Hamaker, PhD Christian Smart, PhD Galorath Human Missions Cost Model Advocates Dr. Joseph Hamaker Dr. Christian Smart Director, NASA and DoD Programs Chief Scientist • Former Director for Cost Analytics • Founding Director of the Cost and Parametric Estimating for the Analysis Division at NASA U.S. Missile Defense Agency Headquarters • Oversaw development of the • Originator of NASA’s NAFCOM NASA/Air Force Cost Model cost model, the NASA QuickCost (NAFCOM) Model, the NASA Cost Analysis • Provides subject matter expertise to Data Requirement and the NASA NASA Headquarters, DARPA, and ONCE database Space Development Agency • Recognized expert on parametrics 2 Agenda Historical human space projects Why consider a new Human Missions Cost Model Database for a Human Missions Cost Model • NASA has over 50 years of Human Space Missions experience • NASA’s International Partners have accomplished additional projects . • There are around 70 projects that can provide cost and schedule data • This talk will explore how that data might be assembled to form the basis for a Human Missions Cost Model WHY A NEW HUMAN MISSIONS COST MODEL? NASA’s Artemis Program plans to Artemis needs cost and schedule land humans on the moon by 2024 estimates Lots of projects: Lunar Gateway, Existing tools have some Orion, landers, SLS, commercially applicability but it seems obvious provided elements (which we may (to us) that a dedicated HMCM is want to independently estimate) needed Some of these elements have And this can be done—all we ongoing cost trajectories (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • CSM15 Launch Escape System
    LAUNCH ESCAPE PITCH CONTROL MOTO TOWER JETTISON MOTOR LAUNCH ESCAPE MOTO CANARD LAUNCH ESCAPE MOTOR ACTUATOR THRUST ALIGNMENT FITIING STU OS & POWER SYSTEMS & INSTRUMENTATION WIRE HARNESS FRANGIBLE LAUNCH ESCAPE TOWER ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT FITIINGS P-186 BOOST PROTECTIVE COVER (APEX SECTION) Launch escape subsystem The launch escape subsystem will take the com­ nozzles and at the bottom to the command module mand module containing the astronauts away from by means of an explosive connection. the launch vehicle in case of an emergency on the pad or shortly after launch. The subsystem carries A boost protective cover is attached to the tower the CM to a sufficient height and to the side, away and completely covers the command module. This from the launch vehicle, so that the earth landing cover protects the command module from the subsystem can operate. rocket exhaust and also from the heating generated by launch vehicle boost through the atmosphere. It The subsystem looks like a large rocket con­ remains attached to the tower and is carried away nected to the command module by a lattice-work when the launch escape assembly is jettisoned. tower. It is 33 feet long and weighs about 8,000 pounds. The maximum diameter of the launch The subsystem is activated automatically by the escape assembly is four feet. emergency detection system in the first 100 seconds or manually by the astronauts at any time The forward or rocket section of the subsystem from the pad to jettison altitude. With the Saturn is cylindrical and houses three solid-propellant V, the subsystem is jettisoned at about 295,000 rocket motors and a ballast compartment topped by feet, or about 30 seconds after ignition of the a nose cone containing instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orion Spacecraft As a Key Element in a Deep Space Gateway
    The Orion Spacecraft as a Key Element in a Deep Space Gateway A Technical Paper Presented by: Timothy Cichan Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] Kerry Timmons Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] Kathleen Coderre Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] Willian D. Pratt Lockheed Martin Space [email protected] July 2017 © 2014 Lockheed Martin Corporation Abstract With the Orion exploration vehicle and Space Launch System (SLS) approaching operational status, NASA and the international community are developing the next generation of habitats to serve as a deep space platform that will be the first of its kind, a cislunar Deep Space Gateway (DSG). The DSG is evolvable, flexible, and modular. It would be positioned in the vicinity of the Moon and allow astronauts to demonstrate they can operate for months at a time well beyond Low Earth Orbit. Orion is the next generation human exploration spacecraft being developed by NASA. It is designed to perform deep space exploration missions, and is capable of carrying a crew of 4 astronauts on independent free-flight missions up to 21 days, limited only by consumables. Because Orion meets the strict requirements for deep space flight environments (reentry conditions, deep-space communications, safety, radiation, and life support for example) it is a key element in a DSG and is more than just a transportation system. Orion has the capability to act as the command deck of any deep space piloted vehicle. To increase affordability and reduce the complexity and number of subsystem functions the early DSG must be responsible for, the DSG can leverage these unique deep space qualifications of Orion.
    [Show full text]
  • Launch Abort System Crew Module Service Module
    LAUNCH ABORT SYSTEM National Aeronautics and The launch abort system, positioned on a tower atop the Space Administration crew module, can activate within milliseconds to propel the vehicle to safety and position the crew module for a safe landing. CREW MODULE The crew module is capable of transporting four to six crew members beyond the moon, providing a safe habitat from launch through landing and recovery. Inside the familiar deep-space capsule shape are advances in life support, avionics, power systems, and advanced manufacturing techniques. SERVICE MODULE Created in collaboration with ESA (European Space Agency), the service module provides support to the crew module from launch through separation prior to entry. It NASA’s Orion spacecraft will carry astronauts provides in-space propulsion capability for orbital transfer, farther than humans have ever gone before. attitude control and high altitude ascent aborts. While It will serve as the exploration vehicle that will mated with the crew module, it also provides water and air carry the crew to deep space, provide to support the crew. emergency abort capability, sustain astronauts during their missions and provide safe re-entry SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM back to Earth. The Space Launch System is a powerful launch vehicle, which will expand human presence to celestial destinations beyond low-Earth orbit and throughout the Orion features technology advancements and solar system. This launch vehicle will be capable of innovations that have been incorporated into launching Orion to asteroids, the moon and on the the spacecraft's design. It includes crew and journey to Mars. service modules, a spacecraft adapter and a revolutionary launch abort system that will significantly increase crew safety.
    [Show full text]
  • ISS Interface Mechanisms and Their Lineage
    ISS Interface Mechanisms and their Heritage The International Space Station, by nurturing technological development of a variety of pressurized and unpressurized interface mechanisms fosters “competition at the technology level”. Such redundancy and diversity allows for the development and testing of mechanisms that might be used for future exploration efforts. The International Space Station, as a test-bed for exploration, has 4 types of pressurized interfaces between elements and 6 unpressurized attachment mechanisms. Lessons learned from the design, test and operations of these mechanisms will help inform the design for a new international standard pressurized docking mechanism for the NASA Docking System. This paper will examine the attachment mechanisms on the ISS and their attributes. It will also look ahead at the new NASA docking system and trace its lineage to heritage mechanisms. ISS Interface Mechanisms and their Heritage John Cook1, Valery Aksamentov2, Thomas Hoffman3, and Wes Bruner4 The Boeing Company, 13100 Space Center Boulevard, Houston, Texas, 77059 The International Space Station, by requiring technological development of a variety of pressurized and unpressurized interface mechanisms fosters “competition at the technology level”. Such redundancy and diversity allows for the development and testing of mechanisms that might be used for future exploration efforts. The International Space Station, as a test-bed for exploration, has four types of pressurized interfaces between elements and nine unpressurized attachment mechanisms. Lessons learned from the design, test and operations of these mechanisms will aid in the design for a new International Standard pressurized docking mechanism for future NASA and commercial vehicles. This paper will examine the attachment mechanisms on the ISS and their attributes.
    [Show full text]