DOCSLIB.ORG

Space Rescue Ensuring the Safety of Manned Space¯Ight David J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Space Rescue Ensuring the Safety of Manned Space¯Ight David J Space Rescue Ensuring the Safety of Manned Space¯ight David J. Shayler Space Rescue Ensuring the Safety of Manned Spaceflight Published in association with Praxis Publishing Chichester, UK David J. Shayler Astronautical Historian Astro Info Service Halesowen West Midlands UK Front cover illustrations: (Main image) Early artist's impression of the land recovery of the Crew Exploration Vehicle. (Inset) Artist's impression of a launch abort test for the CEV under the Constellation Program. Back cover illustrations: (Left) Airborne drop test of a Crew Rescue Vehicle proposed for ISS. (Center) Water egress training for Shuttle astronauts. (Right) Beach abort test of a Launch Escape System. SPRINGER±PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason, B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D. ISBN 978-0-387-69905-9 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2008934752 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. # Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2009 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci®c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: Jim Wilkie Project management: Originator Publishing Services, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK Printed on acid-free paper Contents Author's preface ....................................... xiii Acknowledgments ...................................... xv Foreword by Paul J. Weitz ................................ xvii List of ®gures ........................................ xxi List of abbreviations and acronyms ........................... xxvii Prologue ............................................ xxxi 1 STS-107: Rescue or repair? ............................. 1 Columbia's last ¯ight ................................. 1 Columbia's 28th mission . .......................... 3 Columbia is lost ................................ 4 The physical cause............................... 5 Rescue or repair? ................................... 6 Extending the mission . .......................... 6 Inspection EVA ................................ 6 Atlantis to the rescue . .......................... 9 Rescue mission crewing . .......................... 10 The Space Shuttle rescue ball . .......................... 10 Hypothetical Columbia rescue mission pro®le ................. 14 Template comparisons . .......................... 14 Atlantis rescue mission . .......................... 15 Rescue EVA................................... 19 Atlantis return and Columbia disposal.................. 22 A repair EVA option? ................................ 23 Limited options................................. 24 vi Contents RepairEVA techniques ........................... 26 Alternative options .................................. 26 LiOH regeneration............................... 26 Alternative vehicles .............................. 27 Reality check ...................................... 27 References ........................................ 29 2 Space: A ®nal frontier ................................ 31 Ambassadors of humanity ............................. 32 The Outer Space TreatyÐan International Agreement ....... 32 Rescue Agreement ............................... 33 Keeping it updated .............................. 34 Back to the future ............................... 35 The theory of risk................................... 36 Keeping the public aware .......................... 38 Hazards of ¯ying in space.......................... 38 Rescue systems and options......................... 43 Safety in mission design ............................... 47 Mission design ................................. 47 Nominal mission design ........................... 49 Contingency mission design ......................... 50 De®ning launch aborts ............................ 52 Orbital operations condensation ...................... 54 Descent phase consideration ........................ 54 Summary......................................... 55 References ........................................ 56 3 Training to survive................................... 57 NASA astronaut survival and wilderness training .............. 57 Mercury..................................... 58 Gemini ...................................... 60 Apollo. ...................................... 63 Shuttle ...................................... 67 Constellation .................................. 74 Russian cosmonaut survival training ....................... 74 Vostok and Voskhod ............................. 74 Soyuz....................................... 76 Zond ....................................... 80 Buran....................................... 80 Chinese survival training............................... 81 Passenger and specialist survival training .................... 81 American payload specialists ........................ 82 Russian cosmonaut researchers....................... 83 International crewing ............................. 84 References ........................................ 84 Contents vii 4 Pad escape........................................ 85 If a launch goes wrong ............................... 85 Atthepad........................................ 86 BaikonurCosmodrome. .......................... 86 Cape Canaveral................................. 89 Kennedy Space Center. .......................... 93 Vandenberg Air Force Base......................... 104 China....................................... 105 References ........................................ 106 5 Launch escape, 1: Escape towers .......................... 107 Escape towers...................................... 107 Mercury Launch Escape Tower .......................... 108 Reliability and safety in ¯ight ....................... 108 Mercury Escape Tower. .......................... 109 System operation................................ 111 The astronaut ``chicken switch'' ...................... 114 Evolving the system .............................. 115 Little rocket for a big role ......................... 115 Form-®tting couch............................... 118 Wind tunnels and ground tests....................... 118 Tractor rocket de®nition . .......................... 118 Beach abort program . .......................... 119 Little Joe ..................................... 119 Mercury-Redstone ............................... 123 The day they launched the escape tower ................ 123 Mercury-Atlas.................................. 125 Summary ..................................... 125 Gemini Launch Escape Tower. .......................... 126 Apollo Launch Escape Tower. .......................... 127 Overview ..................................... 128 Hardware..................................... 128 Operation .................................... 131 Apollo abort capabilities . .......................... 134 Launch Escape System development ................... 138 White Sands Launch Facility ........................ 141 Ground-based test program ......................... 142 Apollo LES ¯ight test program ...................... 144 Pad abort tests ................................. 144 Little Joe test program . .......................... 148 Saturn 1 unmanned test program ..................... 151 Manned operations .............................. 152 Summary ..................................... 153 Soyuz Launch Escape Tower. .......................... 153 Development .................................. 154 viii Contents Testing the system ............................... 157 System upgrades ................................ 159 Description and operation .......................... 160 Operational experiences ........................... 162 Summary..................................... 163 OtherSoviet escape towers ............................. 163 TKS ferry for Almaz ............................. 163 Cosmonauts forthe Moon ......................... 164 Launch escape ................................. 164 Shenzhou Launch Escape System ......................... 166 Orion Launch Escape Tower ............................ 168 The Flight Test Of®ce ............................ 170 The test program................................ 170 Test vehicle con®gurations.......................... 172 Launch Abort System ............................ 173 Test stand prepared .............................. 175 AA-1 and beyond ............................... 176 Summary......................................... 176 References ........................................ 177 6 Launch escape, 2: Ejection seats .......................... 179 Ejection seat history ................................. 179 Rocket planes...................................... 180 X-1, breaking the barrier with a parachute (1946±1958) ...... 181 Skystreak and Skyrocket (1947±1956) .................. 181 X-2, a different approach (1952±1956) .................. 181 X-3, stiletto (1952±1956)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Annotated List of Works Cited Primary Sources Newspapers “Apollo 11 se Vraci na Zemi.” Rude Pravo [Czechoslovakia] 22 July 1969. 1. Print. This was helpful for us because it showed how the U.S. wasn’t the only ones effected by this event. This added more to our project so we had views from outside the US. Barbuor, John. “Alunizaron, Bajaron, Caminaron, Trabajaron: Proeza Lograda.” Excelsior [Mexico] 21 July 1969. 1. Print. The front page of this newspaper was extremely helpful to our project because we used it to see how this event impacted the whole world not just America. Beloff, Nora. “The Space Race: Experts Not Keen on Getting a Man on the Moon.” Age [Melbourne] 24 April 1962. 2. Print. This was an incredibly important article to use in out presentation so that we could see different opinions. This article talked about how some people did not want to go to the moon; we didn’t find many articles like this one. In most everything we have read it talks about the advantages of going to the moon. This is why this article was so unique and important. Canadian Press. “Half-billion Watch the Moon Spectacular.” Gazette [Montreal] 21 July 1969. 4. Print. This source gave us a clear idea about how big this event really was, not only was it a big deal in America, but everywhere else in the world. This article told how Russia and China didn’t have TV’s so they had to find other ways to hear about this event like listening to the radio.
    [Show full text]
  • ORION ORION a to Z APOGEE to Break the Frangible Joints and Separate the Fairings, Three Parachutes
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration ORION www.nasa.gov ORION A to Z APOGEE to break the frangible joints and separate the fairings, three parachutes. The next two parachutes will then VAN ALLEN RADIATION BELTS The term apogee refers to the point in an elliptical exposing the spacecraft to space. LAS - LAUNCH ABORT SYSTEM deploy and open. Once the spacecraft slows to around The Van Allen Belts are belts of plasma trapped by orbit when a spacecraft is farthest from the Earth. Orion’s Launch Abort System (LAS) is designed to 100 mph, the three main parachutes will then deploy the Earth’s magnetic field that shield the surface of During Exploration Flight Test-1, Orion’s flight path will GUPPY propel the crew module away from an emergency on using three pilot parachutes and slow the spacecraft the Earth from much of the radiation in space. During take it to an apogee of 3,600 miles. Just how high is The Super Guppy is a special airplane capable of the launch pad or during initial takeoff, moving the to around 20 mph for splashdown in the Pacific Ocean. Exploration Flight Test-1, Orion will pass within the Van that? A commercial airliner flies about 8 miles above transporting up to 26 tons in its cargo compartment crew away from danger. Orion’s LAS has three new When fully deployed, the canopies of three main Allen Radiation Belts and will spend more time in the the Earth’s surface, so Orion’s flight is 450 times farther measuring 25 feet tall, 25 feet wide, and 111 feet long.
    [Show full text]
  • Space: the Luttc Ered Frontier Christopher D
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 60 | Issue 4 Article 6 1995 Space: The luttC ered Frontier Christopher D. Williams Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Christopher D. Williams, Space: The Cluttered Frontier, 60 J. Air L. & Com. 1139 (1995) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol60/iss4/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. SPACE: THE CLUTTERED FRONTIER CHRISTOPHER D. WILIAMs TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................... 1140 II. OVERVIEW OF THE PROBLEM ................ 1141 A. AMOUNT OF DEBRIS .......................... 1141 B. TYPES OF DEBRIS ............................. 1142 C. RISKS OF SPACE DEBRIS ....................... 1144 1. Damage Caused by Space Debris ............ 1144 2. Probability of Collisions With Space Debris ... 1144 3. Interference Caused by Space Debris.......... 1146 III. DEFINING SPACE DEBRIS ..................... 1147 A. WHAT IS A SPACE OBJECT? .................... 1147 B. WHAT IS SPACE DEBRIS? ...................... 1149 IV. INTERNATIONAL LAW PROVISIONS .......... 1151 A. OUTER SPACE TREATY ........................ 1151 1. Article I-General Principles................ 1152 2. Article II-Appropriation Theory ............ 1152 3. Article VI and Article VII-Responsibility and Liability .............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Orbital-Hub: Low Cost Platform for Human Spaceflight After ISS
    67th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Guadalajara, Mexico, 26-30 September 2016. Copyright ©2016 by the International Astronautical Federation (IAF). All rights reserved. IAC-16, B3,1,9,x32622 The Orbital-Hub: Low Cost Platform for Human Spaceflight after ISS O. Romberga, D. Quantiusa, C. Philpota, S. Jahnkea, W. Seboldta, H. Dittusb, S. Baerwaldeb, H. Schlegelc, M. Goldd, G. Zamkad, R. da Costae, I. Retate, R. Wohlgemuthe, M. Langee a German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Space Systems, Bremen, Germany, [email protected] b German Aerospace Center (DLR), Executive Board, Space Research and Technology, Cologne, Germany, c European Space Agency (ESA) Contractor, Johnson Space Center, Houston, USA, d Bigelow Aerospace, Las Vegas / Washington, USA, e Airbus DS, Bremen, Germany Abstract The International Space Station ISS demonstrates long-term international cooperation between many partner governments as well as significant engineering and programmatic achievement mostly as a compromise of budget, politics, administration and technological feasibility. A paradigm shift to use the ISS more as an Earth observation platform and to more innovation and risk acceptance can be observed in the development of new markets by shifting responsibilities to private entities and broadening research disciplines, demanding faster access by users and including new launcher and experiment facilitator companies. A review of worldwide activities shows that all spacefaring nations are developing their individual programmes for the time after ISS. All partners are basically still interested in LEO and human spaceflight as discussed by the ISECG. ISS follow-on activities should comprise clear scientific and technological objectives combined with the long term view on space exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Davis • Critical Essay by Elizabeth Howie
    weep not for the future: the photographs of Sam Davis • Critical Essay by Elizabeth Howie Sam Davis’s work, in particular images from his portfolios Tragic Heroes, Rocketships, and Tin, consists of a variety of approaches to exploring our longstanding fascination with outer space. Utilizing such devices as pinhole, medium format and 4x5 cameras, as well as processing ranging from daguerreotypes to tintypes, silver gelatin, and Chromira C-prints, Davis shows us our memories, dreams, and fantasies about our hopes and fears of the universe around us. Tragic Heroes, consisting almost entirely of panoramic shots, brings us into the proximity of solitary moon-suit clad figures. They are reminiscent of spacemen of cinema and television, such as the 1939 Buck Rogers movie serial, the 1952 serial Commando Cody, Earth vs. the Flying Saucers of 1956, 1959’s When Worlds Collide, or the all-too-earnest space travelers of the original Star Trek, which ran from 1966-69. The gadgets and spacecraft (also made by Davis) evoke even earlier examples, such as ray-guns from the 1936 film Flash Gordon. The above classic early sci-fi vehicles utilized special effects, which now appear quite clunky, to try to demonstrate the wonders and threats of the future.[1] Despite their retro stylings, Davis’s heroes have arrived in that future, and strangely, things have not advanced all that much. But some things are definitely different. Countering the myth of the NASA astronaut as idealized he-man, someone who possesses “the right stuff,”[2] Davis’s figures—and perhaps" spacemen" is a better word than "astronauts," to suggest their relation to science fiction— demonstrate instead a kind of wistful vulnerability we would never have been permitted to observe in the Apollo age.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Practices for Human Space Flight Occupant Safety
    Recommended Practices for Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Version 1.0 August 27, 2014 Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation 800 Independence Avenue, Room 331 7 3 Washington, DC 20591 0 0 - 4 1 C T Recommended Practices for Human Space Flight Page ii Occupant Safety – Version 1.0 Record of Revisions Version Description Date 1.0 Baseline version of document August 27, 2014 Recommended Practices for Human Space Flight Page iii Occupant Safety – Version 1.0 Recommended Practices for Human Space Flight Page iv Occupant Safety – Version 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope ................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Development Process ....................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Level of Risk and Level of Care ...................................................................................... 2 4.1 Level of Risk ................................................................................................................ 2 4.2 Level of Care ................................................................................................................ 3 5.0 Structure and Nature of the
    [Show full text]
  • Shroudlines Vol 13 Issue 1 11X17.Pub
    DARS NAR Section #308 SHROUDLINES Jan/Feb 2004 A Newsletter of the Dallas Area Rocket Society Volume 13, Issue 1 Dallas Area Rocket Society (“DARS”) In Memory of Beth Sapp By James Gartrell This issue of Shroudlines is devoted to Beth Sapp, loving and devoted wife of Tim Sapp, and loving and devoted mother of her two sons whom she loved so dearly, Alex and Eric. Although Beth has left this physical world, she will always remain in our hearts and minds. I know I speak for everyone from DARS when I say our deepest sympathies go Member - National Association out to Tim, Alex and Eric, and the rest of of Rocketry (“NAR”). their family. They will forever remain in my prayers, and I think that’s what Beth would want us all to do. Special points of interest: • In Memory of Beth Sapp - This Beth was also a dear friend and a wonderful Valwood Branch at: 13940 N. Stemmons Freeway, Suite A, Farmers Branch, TX 75234 issue is devoted to the memory person, DARS member and certified Level 2, of Beth Sapp. The first three Telephone (972) 406-1116, Fax (972) 406-9998, www.kinkos.com and much more. I don’t think there are pages include remembrances enough words or the right words to truly and photos of Beth. memorialize a person as special as Beth was, • Currently planned Launches, even though I’ve had a long time to think Outreach, and Contest Events about it since her funeral on January 24. The Dallas Area Rocket Society for 2004 are listed.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthrise- Contents and Chapter 1
    EARTHRISE: HOW MAN FIRST SAW THE EARTH Contents 1. Earthrise, seen for the first time by human eyes 2. Apollo 8: from the Moon to the Earth 3. A Short History of the Whole Earth 4. From Landscape to Planet 5. Blue Marble 6. An Astronaut’s View of Earth 7. From Cold War to Open Skies 8. From Spaceship Earth to Mother Earth 9. Gaia 10. The Discovery of the Earth 1. Earthrise, seen for the first time by human eyes On Christmas Eve 1968 three American astronauts were in orbit around the Moon: Frank Borman, James Lovell, and Bill Anders. The crew of Apollo 8 had been declared by the United Nations to be the ‘envoys of mankind in outer space’; they were also its eyes.1 They were already the first people to leave Earth orbit, the first to set eyes on the whole Earth, and the first to see the dark side of the Moon, but the most powerful experience still awaited them. For three orbits they gazed down on the lunar surface through their capsule’s tiny windows as they carried out the checks and observations prescribed for almost every minute of this tightly-planned mission. On the fourth orbit, as they began to emerge from the far side of the Moon, something happened. They were still out of radio contact with the Earth, but the on- board voice recorder captured their excitement. Borman: Oh my God! Look at that picture over there! Here’s the Earth coming up. Wow, that is pretty! Anders: Hey, don’t take that, it’s not scheduled.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey: the International Space Station an Annotated Storyboard: an Example of How to Create a Digital Story
    A Journey: The International Space Station An Annotated Storyboard: An Example of How to Create a Digital Story This was my first attempt to create a digital story, and in fact the first time I had ever done video editing on the computer. As a result, it is not perfect. The original intent had been to create a digital story of no more than about 7 minutes length, that told of some aspect of my life, Work or interests. It was to include a variety of images and videos from several sources, have a soundtrack, and my own narration. One of the first things you are told when you go to build a digital story, is to create a storyboard to lay out your ideas, scenes, script and thoughts, aims and goals for each segment of the story. This was not how I created this story. I think visually. My first steps were to review my extensive image and video collection to identify source material and a list of topics from which I would begin my work, and from that, to select a series of videos and still images which I would try to incorporate in my story, and lay them out in a meaningful order. My original idea was to talk about different spacecraft and how they operate. But during the initial review of a preliminary draft of that story, my mentor asked, “why is this meaningful for you” and, when I showed videos of the interior of the space station, he asked “well I see a bunch of stuff, but what is it?” This set me off in a somewhat different direction from where I had started.
    [Show full text]
  • THE APPLICABILITY of the NORMS of EMERGENCY RESCUE of ASTRONAUTS to SPACE TOURISTS Author
    The King’s Student Law Review Title: THE APPLICABILITY OF THE NORMS OF EMERGENCY RESCUE OF ASTRONAUTS TO SPACE TOURISTS Author: Tanvi Mani Source: The King’s Student Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 1 (2016), pp. 28-39 Published by: King’s College London on behalf of The King’s Student Law Review All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature, without the prior, express written permission of the King’s Student Law Review. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Enquiries concerning reproducing outside these terms and in other countries should be sent to the Editor in Chief. KSLR is an independent, not-for-profit, online academic publication managed by students of the King’s College London School of Law. The KSLR seeks to publish high-quality legal scholarship written by undergraduate and graduate students at King’s and other leading law schools across the globe. For more information about the KSLR, please contact: [email protected]. ©King’s Student Law Review 2016 THE APPLICABILITY OF THE NORMS OF EMERGENCY RESCUE OF ASTRONAUTS TO SPACE TOURISTS THE APPLICABILITY OF THE NORMS OF EMERGENCY RESCUE OF ASTRONAUTS TO SPACE TOURISTS Tanvi Mani* The rescue of Space Tourists is a significant issue that has been effectively excluded from the domain of Outer Space Law and policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rex D. Hall and David J. Shayler
    Rex D. Hall and David J. Shayler Soyuz A Universal Spacecraft ruuiiMicPublishedu 11in1 aaaundiiuiassociationi witwimh ^^ • Springer Praxis Publishing PRHB Chichester, UK "^UF Table of contents Foreword xvii Authors' preface xix Acknowledgements xxi List of illustrations and tables xxiii Prologue xxix ORIGINS 1 Soviet manned spaceflight after Vostok 1 Design requirements 1 Sever and the 1L: the genesis of Soyuz 3 The Vostok 7/1L Soyuz Complex 4 The mission sequence of the early Soyuz Complex 6 The Soyuz 7K complex 7 Soyuz 7K (Soyuz A) design features 8 The American General Electric concept 10 Soyuz 9K and Soyuz 1 IK 11 The Soyuz Complex mission profile 12 Contracts, funding and schedules 13 Soyuz to the Moon 14 A redirection for Soyuz 14 The N1/L3 lunar landing mission profile 15 Exploring the potential of Soyuz 16 Soyuz 7K-P: a piloted anti-satellite interceptor 16 Soyuz 7K-R: a piloted reconnaissance space station 17 Soyuz VI: the military research spacecraft Zvezda 18 Adapting Soyuz for lunar missions 20 Spacecraft design changes 21 Crewing for circumlunar missions 22 The Zond missions 23 The end of the Soviet lunar programme 33 The lunar orbit module (7K-LOK) 33 viii Table of contents A change of direction 35 References 35 MISSION HARDWARE AND SUPPORT 39 Hardware and systems 39 Crew positions 40 The spacecraft 41 The Propulsion Module (PM) 41 The Descent Module (DM) 41 The Orbital Module (OM) 44 Pyrotechnic devices 45 Spacecraft sub-systems 46 Rendezvous, docking and transfer 47 Electrical power 53 Thermal control 54 Life support 54
    [Show full text]
  • EH9.3 JULYL04 Gallery.Pmd
    gallery NEIL MAHER ON SHOOTING THE MOON ON 22 APRIL 1970, the first Earth Day, citizens paraded, rallied, and protested for the environment with drawings, paintings, and illustrations—but not with photographs—of the entire Earth. No such photograph existed. In 1970, the reigning iconic image of the Earth from space was the first picture shown here, Earthrise, taken by Apollo 8 in late December of 1968. On 7 December 1972, an Apollo 17 astronaut snapped the second photograph below, which quickly replaced Earthrise as the image of Earth from space for an American public ready to “Think Globally, Act Locally.” This essay explores the connections between technology, nature, and narrative in the production and reception of these two popular NASA photographs. While both these pictures are familiar to Americans today, the stories they tell are less well known, surprisingly divergent, and indicate that whether we are hiking close to home with map and compass or rocketing toward the Moon, technology mediates our contact with the environment and in doing so shapes the stories we tell about nature. As important, these extraterrestrial tales also suggest how the relationship between nature and technology in American culture shifted during four of the most turbulent years of the postwar period.1 The technology used to create and publicize these two photographs was nearly identical. Both the Apollo 8 and Apollo 17 missions depended on three-stage Saturn 5 rockets, developed by NASA’s Wernher Von Braun, to transport astronauts far enough from Earth—approximately 240,000 nautical miles—to peer back at the entire planet.
    [Show full text]