DOCSLIB.ORG

Presidential Aids Advisory Panel Report 2 3.2 OVERVIEW on the NECESSITY for SURVEILLANCE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Presidential Aids Advisory Panel Report 2 3.2 OVERVIEW on the NECESSITY for SURVEILLANCE PRESIDENTIAL AIDS ADVISORY PANEL REPORT A synthesis report of the deliberations by the panel of experts invited by the President of the Republic of South Africa, the Honourable Mr Thabo Mbeki March 2001 Contents CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................... 7 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 8 CHAPTER 1 – SETTING THE SCENE .................................................................................. 9 1.1 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................9 1.2 COMPOSITION OF THE PRESIDENTIAL AIDS ADVISORY PANEL ............................................................10 1.3 TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL AIDS ADVISORY PANEL ................................................11 1.4 THE REPORT.............................................................................................................................13 CHAPTER 2 - AETIOLOGY AND TRANSMISSION OF AIDS ................................................ 15 2.1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................15 2.2 DOES HIV CAUSE AIDS?............................................................................................................16 2.2.1 Visualisation and Isolation of the Virus ..........................................................................16 2.2.2 PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and ELISAs ...............................................................18 2.2.3 Clinical and Laboratory Evidence of Causation...............................................................19 2.2.4 Evidence from Animal Models........................................................................................22 2.2.5 Epidemiological Evidence ..............................................................................................22 2.3 ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS ON THE CAUSE OF AIDS..........................................................................23 2.3.1 The Chemical AIDS Hypothesis......................................................................................23 2.3.2 The Immunotoxicological Hypothesis.............................................................................24 2.3.3 The Oxidation Hypothesis..............................................................................................24 2.4 THE INVOLVEMENT OF COFACTORS (OR RISK FACTORS) IN AIDS.........................................................24 2.4.1 Involvement of cofactors in HIV-causes-AIDS Hypothesis..............................................25 2.4.2 Risk factors that are the primary cause of AIDS according to alternative hypotheses/theories......................................................................................................27 2.5 TRANSMISSION OF HIV AND AIDS ...............................................................................................28 2.5.1 HIV Transmission as Estimated from ‘AIDS Deaths’ .......................................................29 2.5.2 Sexual Transmission......................................................................................................30 2.5.3 Mother-to-Child Transmission........................................................................................32 2.5.4 Blood-borne transmission and Occupational Exposure ...................................................33 2.5.5 Epidemiology of Transmission .......................................................................................34 CHAPTER 3 – SURVEILLANCE ........................................................................................ 37 3.1 WHAT ARE THE QUESTIONS AND ISSUES? .......................................................................................37 Presidential Aids Advisory Panel Report 2 3.2 OVERVIEW ON THE NECESSITY FOR SURVEILLANCE............................................................................37 3.3 SOUTH AFRICAN EPIDEMIC – FACT OR FICTION................................................................................38 3.3.1 AIDS mortality...............................................................................................................39 3.4 EPIDEMIOLOGICAL THEORY OF CAUSAL INFERENCE...........................................................................41 3.5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC RISK FACTORS ..................................................................................................42 3.6 DIFFERENCES IN THE AFRICAN EPIDEMIC, COMPARED WITH EUROPE AND THE USA .................................43 3.7 THE ROLE OF MATHEMATICAL MODELS IN FORECASTING THE EPIDEMIC..................................................44 3.8 SURVEILLANCE RECOMMENDATIONS – WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT THE SOUTH AFRICAN EPIDEMIC?.......45 3.8.1 Deliberations of the panel .............................................................................................45 RECOMMENDATION ..............................................................................................................................45 3.8.2 Discussion on mortality data .........................................................................................45 RECOMMENDATION ..............................................................................................................................45 3.8.3 Recommendations from panellists who do not subscribe to the causal linkage between HIV and AIDS................................................................................................................45 3.8.4 Recommendations from panellists who subscribe to HIV as the cause of AIDS ..............46 3.8.5 General recommendation ..............................................................................................48 CHAPTER 4 - HIV TESTS AND THEIR ACCURACY............................................................49 4.1 HIV TESTING ...........................................................................................................................49 4.1.1 ELISA test....................................................................................................................50 4.1.2 Western Blot .................................................................................................................51 4.1.3 PCR test for viral load ...................................................................................................52 4.1.4 CD4 count.....................................................................................................................53 4.2 VIRUS ISOLATION OR CO-CULTURING.............................................................................................53 4.3 MORATORIUM ON HIV TESTING ...................................................................................................53 4.4 RECOMMENDATIONS ON HIV TESTING ...........................................................................................54 4.4.1 Proposed studies and experiments ................................................................................54 4.4.2 Recommendation on future HIV testing.........................................................................55 4.4.3 General recommendations on testing ............................................................................55 CHAPTER 5 –THE TREATMENT OF AIDS AND THE USE OF ANTI-RETROVIRAL DRUGS ...... 56 5.1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................56 5.2 EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF THE USE OF ANTI-RETROVIRAL DRUGS .........................................................56 5.3 EVIDENCE AGAINST THE USE OF ANTI-RETROVIRAL DRUGS..................................................................57 5.4 RECOMMENDATIONS ON TREATMENT WITH ANTI-RETROVIRAL DRUG .....................................................59 5.4.1 Recommendations on the use of anti-retroviral drugs from the group opposed to their use................................................................................................................................59 5.4.2 Recommendations from the proponents of anti-retroviral drug use................................60 RECOMMENDATIONS: ...........................................................................................................................61 CHAPTER 6: PREVENTIVE AND PROPHYLACTIC MEASURES AGAINST AIDS ................... 63 Presidential Aids Advisory Panel Report 3 6.1 PREVENTION OF AIDS FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF PANELLISTS WHO DO NOT SUPPORT THE CAUSAL LINK BETWEEN HIV AND AIDS ..........................................................................................................64 6.1.1 Recommendations.........................................................................................................64 6.2 PREVENTION OF AIDS FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF PANELLISTS WHO SUPPORT THE CAUSAL LINK OF HIV TO AIDS ....................................................................................................................................65 6.2.1 General recommendations.............................................................................................66 6.2.2 Recommendations on prevention of HIV/AIDS through sexual transmission ..................66
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kate Fitzgerald
    In This Issue: 2020 Young Investigator Awardees pg. 3-9 In Memorium page pg. 14-15 New Member Mini-Bios pg. 19-21 Trials of Interferon Lambda pg. 31 Cytokines 2021 Hybrid Meetin pg. 24-27 Signals THE INTERNATIONAL CYTOKINE & INTERFERON SOCIETY + NEWSLETTER APRIL 2021 I VOLUME 9 I NO. 1 A NOTE FROM THE ICIS PRESIDENT Kate Fitzgerald Dear Colleagues, Greetings from the International Cytokine and Interferon Society! I hope you and your family are staying safe during these still challenging times. Thankfully 2020 is behind us now. We have lived through the COVID-19 pandemic, an event that will continue to impact our lives for some time and likely alter how we live in the future. Despite the obvious difficulties of this past year, I can’t help but marvel at the scientific advances that have been made. With everything from COVID-19 testing, to treatments and especially to the rapid pace of vaccine development, we are so better off today than even a few months back. The approval of remarkably effective COVID-19 vaccines now rolling out in the US, Israel, UK, Europe and across the globe, brings light at the end of the tunnel. The work of many of you has helped shape our understanding of the host response to Sars-CoV2 and the ability of this virus to limit antiviral immunity while simultaneously driving a cytokine driven hyperinflammatory response leading to deadly consequences for patients. The knowledge gained from all of your efforts has been put to good use to stem the threat of this deadly virus.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Research in Action Awards
    TREATMENT ACTION GROUP The Board of Trustees 2016 RESEARCH IN ACTION AWARDS and staff of amfAR, The Foundation Treatment Action Group’s (TAG’s) annual Research in Action Awards honor activists, scientists, philanthropists and creative artists who have made for AIDS Research extraordinary contributions in the fight against AIDS. Tonight’s awards ceremony is a fundraiser to support TAG’s programs and provides a forum for honoring heroes of the epidemic. salute the recipients of the HONOREES LEVI STRAUSS & CO. for advancing human rights and the fight 2016 TAG Research in Action Awards against HIV/AIDS ROSIE PEREZ actor/activist MARGARET RUSSELL award-winning design journalist/editor, Levi Strauss & Co. cultural leader and accomplished advocate for HIV prevention and care BARBARA HUGHES longtime AIDS activist and dedicated Rosie Perez President of TAG’s Board since 1996 HOSTS Margaret Russell JENNA WOLFE lifestyle and fitness expert BRUCE VILANCH comedy writer, songwriter, actor and Emmy ® Barbara Hughes Award winner THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2016 6PM Cocktails and Hors d’Oeuvres 7PM Awards Presentation SLATE www.amfar.org 54 West 21st Street New York City TAG ad 102716.indd 1 10/27/16 3:17 PM TAG 2016 LIMITED ART EDITION RIAA 2016 CO-CHAIRS SCOTT CAMPBELL Executive Director, Elton John AIDS Foundation DICK DADEY Executive Director, Citizens Union JOY TOMCHIN Founder of Public Square Films, Executive Producer of How to Survive a Plague and the upcoming documentary Sylvia and Marsha RIAA 2016 HONORARY CHAIRS 2014 RIAA honoree ALAN CUMMING and GRANT SHAFFER 2009 RIAA honoree DAVID HYDE PIERCE and BRIAN HARGROVE ROSALIND FOX SOLOMON Animal Landscape, 1979 Archival pigment print | 15 1/2 x 15 1/2 inches | 8-ply mat + granite welded metal frame + uv plexi 23 1/2 x 23 inches | Edition of 15 + 3 AP's | ©Rosalind Fox Solomon, www.rosalindsolomon.com RIAA 2016 COMMITTEE Courtesy of Bruce Silverstein Gallery Joy Episalla, Chair for Projects Plus, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    AGING AND HIV THOUGHTS ON PrEP FROM the FIRST PERSON CURED of HIV ARE YOU AT RISK FOR ANAL CANCER? POSITIVELY AWARE THE HIV TREATMENT JOURNAL OF TEST POSITIVE AWARE NETWORK JANUARY+FEBRUARY 2015 LEONG-T RM suRVIVORS ARE Not JUST LIVING loNGER, they’RE KICKING TEZ ANDERSON AND MATT SHARP take on AIDS ASS SURVIVOR SYNDROME This page intentionally left blank. ➤ POSITIVELY AWARE [email protected] CORRE CTING A disease and remind us not to focus exclu- know that all the hard work that goes into CONTRADICTION sively on T-cells and antiretrovirals. compiling such a class A magazine is not IN TERMS —CARL STEIN, MHS, PAC, AAHIVS overlooked. May you be blessed. PHYSiciAN ASSISTANT —C HERYL VITELLO R egarding “Can Hepatitis C Be Sexually OWEN MEDICAL GROUP GATESVILLE, TX Transmitted?” in the November+December SAN FRANCISCO, CA StiGMA 2014 issue: On page 28 Andrew Reynolds responds: I am currently incarcerated at Collins the author writes, Correctional Facility in Collins, New York. “We know that Dear Carl and other readers, I want to tell how I was a target of HIV stigma HCV is present in Thank you for the careful (“Have you ever been the target of HIV stigma blood, but there reading and feedback on the or discrimination?” poll, September+October is no evidence article “Can Hepatitis C Be 2014). It started right in my own neighbor- that it is found Sexually Transmitted?” You are hood after I disclosed to someone who I in semen....” On absolutely correct in my contra- thought was a friend. He eventually told some page 29 the author diction on pages 28 and 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Leon Chaitow Protease Inhibitors the Drug-AIDS Hypothesis Leon
    CONTINUUM LeonLeon ChaitowChaitow ––holisticholistic healinghealing && AIDSAIDS ProteaseProtease InhibitorsInhibitors ––thethe hypehype fadesfades TheThe Drug-AIDSDrug-AIDS HypothesisHypothesis —what’s—what’s thethe link?link? changing the way we think about aids vol 4 no 5 february/march 1997 UK £3 USA $5 CONTINUUM a magazine by the living for the living vol 4, no 5 why CONTINUUM? focus february/march 1997 Protease Inhibitors The orthodox view on AIDS holds that it is caused by a virus known as HIV that is PIs in Provincetown 8 JOHN LAURITSEN wonders how hope can transmitted through the exchange of body exact such a price fluids. Once infected, a person will remain well for a time, though infectious to others, From Hype to Hesitation 11 before going on to develop AIDS and dying. Recent research has led to serious caution Despite the huge sums of money spent on reports HUW CHRISTIE medical research, there is still no cure, just drug therapies said to slow the progress of the disease, and regular T-cell counts to measure health. features A whole industry has evolved around New Wave in France 13 AIDS, on which many careers and A recent health conference opened doors to businesses depend, but which offers little freedom of treatment hope to those affected. It works on the premise that HIV=AIDS=DEATH. Interview 14 CONTINUUM began as a newsletter Holistic doctor LEON CHAITOW says AIDS is a encouraging those effected to empower complex scenario which natural healing themselves to make care and treatment methods can address choices. As we look further, anomalies in the orthodox view continue to appear.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV Twenty-Eight Years Later: What Is the Truth? Gary Null, Phd December 3, 2012
    HIV Twenty-Eight Years Later: What is the Truth? Gary Null, PhD December 3, 2012 In the May 4, 1984 issue of the prestigious journal Science, one of the most important research papers of the last quarter century was published. “Frequent Detection and Isolation of Cytopathic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) from Patients with AIDS and at Risk for AIDS” would rapidly become the medical Magna Carta for the entire gold rush to develop diagnostic methods to identify the presence of HIV in human blood and to invent pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines in a global war against AIDS. This paper, along with three others published in the same issue of Science, was written by Dr. Robert Gallo, then head of the Laboratory of Tumor Cell Biology (LTCB) at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland, and his lead researcher Dr. Mikulas Popovic. To this day, this article continues to document the most cited research to prove the HIV hypothesis in scientific papers and places like the nation’s Centers of Disease Control (CDC) website. For virologists, molecular biologists and other infectious disease researchers, particularly those tied to the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries and the national medical and health institutions, the news of Gallo’s discovery was manna rained down from heaven. All research into other possible causes for the AIDS crisis ended abruptly. As soon as the winds shifted away from earlier efforts to find the cause of AIDS —people’s lifestyles, immune suppressing illicit drug use and other health risks and illnesses that adversely affect the body’s immune system — to that of a single new virus, the case was closed.
    [Show full text]
  • AIDS Post-HIV : Beat of a Different Drummer
    cover 6/1 9/10/00 3:30 pm Page 1 O C conscious health for radical times AIDS post-HIV : beat of a different drummer The South African Panel of Inquiry Conference in Uganda CONTINUUM Nutrition and immunity Isolation and rejection - the scientific struggles Vol. 6 No. 1/2 autumn 2000 Vol. UUM CONT IN UU M towards a healthier body politic v o l 6, no 1/2 October 2000 C o n s u l t a n t s Michael Baumgartner ,I.F.A.S., Contents Switzerland Lluis Botinas , Co-ordinator COBRA, 2. First International Holistic AIDS Conference - Uganda. Spain Co-organiser Rosalind Harrison reports Leon Chaitow , ND, DO, MRO, England Kevin Corbett, BA(Hons), HDFA, 6. Life cycle - no handicap! An interview with a test-positive MSc, RGN, England man with attitude! Prof. Peter Duesberg , Molecular Biologist, USA Nigel Edwards , MA (Oxon), 8. HIV diagnosis and the potential of a holistic healing process Journalist/Broadcaster, England - research study on the therapeutic effect of Tai Chi, by Carolyn Michael Ellner , DD, MSH, CHt, Howell President HEAL, USA Felix de Fries, Public Relations Consultant, Switzerland 13. President Thabo Mbeki’s letter to President Clinton and Volker Gildemeister , MA, DPhil Prime Minister Blair (Oxon), Biochemist, England Dmitri Gouskov, PhD, Sociologist, Ukraine 15. Folly or Grace - Joan Shenton’s report on the first South Prof. Alfred Hässig , Immunologist, African AIDS Panel meeting Switzerland Neville Hodgkinson , Author/Journalist, England 22. The Second Meeting - Huw Christie’s report on the followup Christine Johnson , Science meeting in Johannesburg Information Co-ordinator, USA Dr med.
    [Show full text]
  • AIDS – the End of Dogma and Taboo!
    AIDS – The End of Dogma and Taboo! What we realize ...and what is hidden. Nothing is harder and needs more character, As to be in open dissent with your time and to say: No! (Kurt Tucholsky, German writer, 1890-1935) Content: Why I want to write this book ………………………………………………….…3 Violation of Human Rights: The Unbelievable Story of the Seebald Family in Austria…………………….…… 5 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….….. 11 1. Progress and Errors in Science and Medicine…………………………………..13 2. The Conflict of Gallo and Montagnier………………………………………….33 1 3. HIV-Tests: Cui bono? (Whose profit?)………………………………………….38 4. What is AIDS? Does a Virus exist?......................................................................44 5. Retrovirus, Research, Revision…………………………………………………..49 6. The Human Genome Project and HIV…………………………………………..53 7. Gene Expression instead of HIV: Epigenetics and RNA……………………….60 8. Pregnancy, Nursing and Positive Testing……………………………………….63 9. The Immune System and AIDS………………………………………….……...71 10. Stress and Disease……………………………………………………………….75 11. Medication and Vaccination…………………………………………………….81 12. AIDS – Latest Findings, that should not be kept secret…………………………86 13. AIDS-“Dissidents”................................................................................................90 14. Epigenetics: About Environmental Influence on the Genome ………………….95 15. Media and the Freedom of Expression……………………………..…………....99 16. Forces that Suppress the Truth …………………………………………………124 17. Consciousness, Freedom and Responsibility……………………………………138 18.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science AIDS Denialism In
    The London School of Economics and Political Science AIDS Denialism in South Africa: A case study in the rationality and ethics of science policy Katherine Furman A thesis submitted to the Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, September 2016. 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. 2 Abstract From 28 October 1999 to 26 September 2000 Mbeki publically endorsed the position of ‘denialist’ AIDS scientists – a marginal group who oppose the claim that HIV causes AIDS – and used their views as the basis for a policy of not providing ARVs (antiretrovirals – the treatment that prevents HIV from replicating) via the public health system. This policy persisted until 2004, with severe consequences – best estimates indicate that it resulted in 171, 000 avoidable new infections and 343,000 deaths over the 1999 – 2002 period. I use this case to address two questions.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE AGAINST HIV-Last Updated 1403-869 References (PDF)
    THE CASE AGAINST HIV October 2013 (Last updated March 2014) Collated by Henry Bauer www.henryhbauer.homestead.com Additions and corrections are welcomed, indeed solicited, at our comments page . That HIV causes AIDS has been the officially sanctioned view for about 3 decades, believed almost universally but questioned openly by thousands of people, some of whom are expert in relevant sciences 1,2,3. These dissidents point out that a comprehensive reading of the mainstream literature together with analysis of mainstream data demonstrates conclusively that HIV is neither a necessary nor a sufficient cause of AIDS. An annotated bibliography of dissident books and other writings was published in 1993 4; dissident books not listed there or published since that time include Bauer 5, Bialy 6, Crewdson 7, Culshaw 8, De Harven 9, Duesberg 10 , Farber 11 , Fiala 12 , Hodgkinson 13 , Konotey 14 , Kremer 15 , Lauritsen 16 , Lauritsen & Young 17 , Leitner 18 , Maggiore 19 , Root-Bernstein 20 , Shenton 21 . The Immunity Resource Foundation ( IRF ) offers important archival material including many documentary films and videos; many issues of Continuum magazine; many links to other AIDS-Rethinking or HIV-Skeptical websites; and a blog and newspage . The 2013 award- winning film, “ Positively False — Birth of a Heresy ” can be rented or bought at the IRF website. Another award-winning documentary is " House of Numbers ." At first sight, that HIV does not cause AIDS must seem unbelievable in light of the officially promulgated view that has so thoroughly pervaded the media and the public sphere. How could medical science be so wrong for so long about something so important? Moreover, haven’t the miracle antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) saved countless lives and changed AIDS from an invariably fatal death sentence into a chronic, manageable, condition? Aren’t Africans dying in hordes from AIDS only because they can’t get enough of those drugs? Those questions can all be answered, but not in any brief way.
    [Show full text]
  • Myths and Misconceptions of the Orthodox View of AIDS in Africa
    Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, IX, 2007, 2, pp. 330-370 Myths and Misconceptions of the Orthodox View of AIDS in Africa CHARLES L. GESHEKTER Department of History California State University, Chico [email protected] “Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood.” Marie Curie “To kill an error is as good a service as, and sometimes even better than, establishing a new truth or fact.” Charles Darwin ABSTRACT This article rebuts conventional claims that AIDS in Africa is a microbial problem to be controlled through sexual abstinence, behavior modification, condoms, and drugs. The or- thodox view mistakenly attributes to sexual activities the common symptoms that define an AIDS case in Africa - diarrhea, high fever, weight loss and dry cough. What has really made Africans increasingly sick over the past 25 years are deteriorating political economies, not people’s sexual behavior. The establishment view on AIDS turned poverty into a medical issue and made everyday life an obsession about safe sex. While the vast, self- perpetuating AIDS industry invented such aggressive phrases as “the war on AIDS” and “fighting stigma,” it viciously denounced any physician, scientist, journalist or citizen who exposed the inconsistencies, contradictions and errors in their campaigns. Thus, fighting AIDS in Africa degenerated into an intolerant religious crusade. Poverty and social ine- quality are the most potent co-factors for an AIDS diagnosis. In South Africa, racial ine- qualities rooted in apartheid mandated rigid segregation of health facilities and dispropor- tionate spending on the health of whites, compared to blacks. Apartheid policies ignored the diseases that primarily afflicted Africans - malaria, tuberculosis, respiratory infections and protein anemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sex, Queer Intimate Kinship, and How the AIDS Epidemic Bathhouse Closures Constituted a Dignity Taking
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 92 Issue 3 Dignity Takings and Dignity Restoration Article 13 3-6-2018 Fucking With Dignity: Public Sex, Queer Intimate Kinship, and How the AIDS Epidemic Bathhouse Closures Constituted a Dignity Taking Stephen M. Engel Bates College Timothy S. Lyle Iona College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen M. Engel & Timothy S. Lyle, Fucking With Dignity: Public Sex, Queer Intimate Kinship, and How the AIDS Epidemic Bathhouse Closures Constituted a Dignity Taking, 92 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 961 (2018). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss3/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. FUCKING WITH DIGNITY: PUBLIC SEX, QUEER INTIMATE KINSHIP, AND HOW THE AIDS EPIDEMIC BATHHOUSE CLOSURES CONSTITUTED A DIGNITY TAKING STEPHEN M. ENGEL* TIMOTHY S. LYLE** I. INTRODUCTION On Friday, March 11, 2016, just before Nancy Reagan’s funeral be- gan, Hillary Clinton offered an unprompted assessment of the former first- lady’s advocacy on AIDS: “It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS in the 1980s. And because of both President and Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scorn of Heretics Anthony F. Liversidge Conference on Science
    The Scorn of Heretics 1 Anthony F. Liversidge Conference on Science and Democracy Naples, April 2001/NYC 2002 THE SCORN OF HERETICS My topic is the unexpected closemindedness of scientists, and people generally, when confronted with new ideas, and why this may occur. But now I feel at a small disadvantage. The previous speaker has challenged our own open mindedness by telling us that nuclear fusion in a bottle is a promising avenue of research, and would be known as such but for its concealment by military interests. Like many people, I am afraid I find this difficult to credit without knowing more. After all, mainstream sources inform us that the claimed phenomenon, once it was announced by two scientists, was investigated by many others, who were unable to replicate it. This, of course, is how professional science works. We confirm or deny the truth of a new claim after a review of the logic and the evidence. But the theme of my own talk is the origin of the unreasonable closemindedness that I and others have documented in the science establishment today, the combination of politics, system flaws and psychology which shores up ruling paradigms against review. Surely, if I reject nuclear fusion in a bottle without researching the issue, I will be acting no differently from the mainstream scientists in, for example, AIDS, my case study, who reject dissent out of hand? The difficulty in AIDS, however, is that an unproven scientific claim has not been dismissed, as in fusion in a bottle. On the contrary, it has been universally adopted as valid, even though conventional scientific review has called it into very serious, in fact, overwhelming doubt.
    [Show full text]