DOCSLIB.ORG

Experiences, Representations, Practices for Studying Cultural Diversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Experiences, Representations, Practices for Studying Cultural Diversity anno XVI (2013), n. 15 (2) ARCHIVIO ISSN 2038-3215 ANTROPOLOGICO MEDITERRANEO ARCHIVIO ANTROPOLOGICO MEDITERRANEO on line anno XVI (2013), n. 15 (2) SEMESTRALE DI SCIENZE UMANE ISSN 2038-3215 Università degli Studi di Palermo Dipartimento di Beni Culturali - Studi Culturali Sezione di Scienze umane, sociali e politiche Direttore responsabile GABRIELLA D’AGOSTINO Comitato di redazione SERGIO BONANZINGA, IGNAZIO E. BUTTITTA, GABRIELLA D’AGOSTINO, FERDINANDO FAVA, VINCENZO MATERA, MATTEO MESCHIARI Segreteria di redazione DANIELA BONANNO, ALESSANDRO MANCUSO, ROSARIO PERRICONE, DAVIDE PORPORATO (website) Impaginazione ALBERTO MUSCO Comitato scientifico MARLÈNE ALBERT-LLORCA Département de sociologie-ethnologie, Université de Toulouse 2-Le Mirail, France ANTONIO ARIÑO VILLARROYA Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, University of Valencia, Spain ANTONINO BUTTITTA Università degli Studi di Palermo, Italy IAIN CHAMBERS Dipartimento di Studi Umani e Sociali, Università degli Studi di Napoli «L’Orientale», Italy ALBERTO M. CIRESE (†) Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, Italy JEFFREY E. COLE Department of Anthropology, Connecticut College, USA JOÃO DE PINA-CABRAL Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal ALESSANDRO DURANTI UCLA, Los Angeles, USA KEVIN DWYER Columbia University, New York, USA DAVID D. GILMORE Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, NY, USA JOSÉ ANTONIO GONZÁLEZ ALCANTUD University of Granada, Spain ULF HANNERZ Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm University, Sweden MOHAMED KERROU Département des Sciences Politiques, Université de Tunis El Manar, Tunisia MONDHER KILANI Laboratoire d’Anthropologie Culturelle et Sociale, Université de Lausanne, Suisse PETER LOIZOS London School of Economics & Political Science, UK ABDERRAHMANE MOUSSAOUI Université de Provence, IDEMEC-CNRS, France HASSAN RACHIK University of Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco JANE SCHNEIDER Ph. D. Program in Anthropology, Graduate Center, City University of New York, USA PETER SCHNEIDER Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Fordham University, USA PAUL STOLLER West Chester University, USA UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PALERMO Dipartimento di Beni Culturali - Studi Culturali Sezione di Scienze umane, sociali e politiche 5 Gabriella D’Agostino, Costruire o de-costruire il campo/Constructing or de-constructing the field Indice De-constructing the field 9 Vincenzo Matera, Ethnography: experiences, representations, practices for studying cultural diversity. Introductory notes 19 Thomas Fillitz, Spatialising the field: Conceptualising fields and interconnections in the context of contemporary art of Africa 29 Michela Fusaschi, Le silence se fait parole : ethnographie, genre et superstes dans le post-génocide rwandais 41 Ferdinando Fava, “Chi sono per i miei interlocutori?”. L’antropologo, il campo e i legami emergenti 59 Nigel Rapport, The informant as anthropologist. Taking seriously “native” individuals’ constructions of social identity and status 69 Paolo Favero, Picturing Life-Worlds in the City. Notes for a Slow, Aimless and Playful Visual Ethnography 87 Francesco Pompeo, «We don’t do politics». Rhetorics of Identity and Immigrant Representation in Rome City Council Documentare 99 Mariano Fresta, Proprietà intellettuale, marchio e cultura popolare. Riflessioni sul caso dei bottari di Macerata Campania e Portico di Caserta 107 Leggere - Vedere - Ascoltare 109 Abstracts In copertina: Photographing the Taj (© Paolo Favero) Vincenzo Matera Ethnography: experiences, representations, practices for studying cultural diversity. Introductory notes During the second half of the twentieth century, dosi ancora eroe solitario, si cimenta con una lin- anthropologists increasingly addressed the issues gua differente dalla propria, in condizioni talvolta De-constructing the field of conflict, cultural and social change and, in more rudi e, più di tutto, con forme altre di vita; oppure general terms, the merging (or, better, the creoliza- oggetto testuale, costrutto narrativo rivelatore tion, see Hannerz 1996), of different cultural and piuttosto dei codici e dei dispositivi retorici che social traits. Hence, at the turn of the century, the ne hanno governata la scrittura, rianimato infine making of hybrid (or creole) cultures, the conflu- solo dalle riletture di chi cerca in esso l’illusione ence of separate and different traditions – that is, nostalgica di mondi sempre a lui lontani? traditions with historical roots in different conti- nents at the moment of their creolization – became A similar question is the one posed some years the main dimension of cultural analysis. This turn ago by Steven Feld, in the first lines of the second signalled that older notions of culture as a holistic edition of Sound and Sentiment (1990). and integrated entity, and especially as a localized entity, were replaced with a new awareness regard- Recent commentaries on anthropological writing ing the creole nature of cultural processes. This have argued that ethnographic texts involved a turn had (and still has) important consequences formidable sense of allegory. The genre is said on ethnography. In part, such consequences, al- to tell us significant things about ourselves, our though they were evident in ethnographic reports modes of constructing “otherness”, our idealiza- (often in non-official ethnographic notes like Ma- tions and self-deceptions, our gender and class linowski’s Diary, for example) or at least in the biases, our time and historical positions. These ethnographic awareness of many scholars, did arguments are undoubtedly true in a general way not emerge fully until the publication of Writing […], but it is also true that an ethnography is Culture and its growing circulation within the an- something more than a Rorschach test of writing thropological community. Still not yet completely conventions, intellectual fads, and tacit prejudic- clear in contemporary anthropology is that, if we es. An ethnography is a report of a unique expe- accept the idea of creolization as the major factor rience. It is about the dialogue of sensibilities im- in the production and circulation of cultural mean- plicated in encountering and depicting a people ings, we have also to deal critically with the idea and place. The work and the writer are thus spe- of an organic relationship among a population, a cifically accountable not just to the interpretive territory, a language, an identity, a form of political preoccupations of scholarly readers, but to that organization, and one of those organized packages people and that place, and to need for incisive of meanings termed “culture” whence the classic and honest depiction (Feld, 1990: X). concept of “field” has been drawn. As Thomas Fillitz writes in his paper, indeed, This point recalls the one underlined by Greg- «Malinowski’s concept of fieldwork has for long ory Bateson, several years ago, in the first pages of passed into the non-debated “archetype” of the his famous book, Naven (1936); Bateson warned discipline’s tradition». However, in more recent against constraining cultural complexity experi- ethnographic research practice, the conceptions enced on the spot, so to speak, into the rigid form that ethnographers have of their fields appear very of a written text made up of linear sentences, se- distant from that ideal. quences of words that can be read one after the Ferdinando Fava too, in his paper, asks a crucial other. Naven is an anomalous ethnographic text in question regarding the archetype of the “field” in which the effort to find a more articulated way to the anthropological tradition. write ethnography was evident. According to Bate- son the core of the ethnographic experience lies in Località geografica, dove l’antropologo, creden- the encounter with a fully multi-sensorial range of 9 ARCHIVIO ANTROPOLOGICO MEDITERRANEO on line, anno XVI (2013), n. 15 (2) human interconnections (see Finnegan 2002). It litical, epistemological and ethical self-awareness. has to do with complex rituals, material objects, This means that the central question at the turn of with all sorts of indexical links between space and the century was no longer only that of Representa- time. This gives a dense sense to this peculiar expe- tion. Another “R” had been added to ethnography, riential dimension of human life. All these multiple that is, Reflexivity. The latter entail an exploration communicative processes are mediated through not of the lived experience of the knowing subject, publicly-shared enactments, not through publica- but of the effects and limits of the (political and tion in written texts. Something similar has been engaged) act of representations (see, for example, claimed by Dennis Tedlock (1983) with regards to Bourdieu 2002; Clark 2004; Kempny 2012; Naza- the dialogical emergence of culture. Tedlock (and ruk 2011; Burawoy 2003; Salzman 2002). Bruce Mannaheim 1995) assign a status of priority Indeed, political and epistemological conscious- to dialogue with respect to monologue. The latter ness – reflexivity – entails a critical view of culture, is the real core of any ethnographic experience – no longer something that we observe as social sci- especially in storytelling and oral narrative studies entists and talk about and describe by writing, by – even though it will sooner or later be transformed a more or less plain (more or less unproblematic) into a monological written text following the norms use of writing. Rather, it is a position that we speak of the ethnographic genre.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blackwell Companion to the Anthropology of Politics
    1 Blackwell Companion to the Anthropology of Politics Human Rights Richard A. Wilson [email protected] I. Human Rights, Cultural Relativism and the Cold War In the middle of the twentieth century, cultural anthropology was largely hostile to the notion of human rights, but by the end of the twentieth century, the study of human rights had become a significant strand within political anthropology. This is an account of that realignment of the place of rights in the discipline from marginality to mainstream. The key to understanding anthropology's historical opposition to human rights lies in the centrality of the concept of 'culture' and the resultant adherence to a moral-ethical position of cultural relativism within the discipline during the Cold War period of 1945-1989. In the United States by the 1940s, cultural anthropology was becoming established in universities as one of the youngest of the social sciences. The founding father of modern cultural anthropology in the US was a German emigré Franz Boas (1859-1941), who carried out empirical research among Inuit (Eskimos) and North American Indians. Boas reacted against the widely accepted evolutionary theories of the time, advocated by those such as the British anthropologist Edward Tylor, the sociologist Hebert Spencer and Lewis Henry Morgan who in turn influenced Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Evolutionism broadly asserted that all societies progressed in a unilinear fashion along a scale from the most 'simple' to the most 'complex', with each stage achieving a higher level of moral and societal improvement. In the context of the European colonialism of the time, this social evolutionism involved an explicit ranking of societies which reinforced the colonial project and a sense of western superiority.
    [Show full text]
  • Swedish Anthropology: Past and Present Ulf Hannerz | Professor Emeritus of Social Anthropology, Stockholm University
    kritisk etnografi – Swedish Journal of Anthropology VOL. 1, NO. 1, 55-68 URN: URN:NBN:SE:UU:DIVA-355995 Swedish Anthropology: Past and Present Ulf Hannerz | Professor Emeritus of Social Anthropology, Stockholm University I have been in Swedish anthropology, and what went before it, for well over half a century now. What follows is an assemblage of recollections, opinions and attempted overview.1 It was the early 1960s. I was nineteen, an undergraduate newcomer at Stockholm University, and without definite plans for how I would spend my life. But I had become interested in Africa – a “wind of change” was blowing through the continent, as one British prime minister commented when he witnessed a large part of the Empire turning independent. What could I do at the university to satisfy my curiosity? Not much, it seemed. In the early 1960s, the human sciences at Swedish universities were mostly complacently inward-turning, occasionally concerning themselves with European themes, casting a glance toward North America mostly as it related to Swedish emigration as a topic in history, but certainly not paying much attention to the rest of the world. So I decided to spend a term taking the introductory course, and whatever else might be on offer, in the discipline known as General and Comparative Ethnography. (The term “anthropology” was at the time officially connected only to “physical anthropology,” a quaint one-man enterprise in a back alley of Swedish academic life, engaging in skull measurements and self-publishing text books.) I believe there were twelve of us taking the course. Beyond a sort of academic legitimation, however, this did not offer much of a response to my kind of African interests either.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Laborative Anthropology Crafting Reflexivities Experimentally
    Secondary publication on the edoc server of the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Chapter in an edited volume Co-laborative anthropology Crafting reflexivities experimentally Jörg Niewöhner∗ 2016 This is the submitted, english-language manuscript (preprint) of the published chap- ter in an edited volume as follows: Title Yhteistyöstävä Antropologia [Co-laborative anthropology] Subtitle Kuinka edistää refleksiivisyyttä kokeellisesti [Crafting reflex- ivities experimentally] Author Niewöhner, Jörg Date of publication 2016 Title of the edited volume Etnologinen tulkinta ja analyysi: Kohti avoimempaa tutkimus- prosessia [Ethnological interpretation and analysis: Towards a transparent research process] Editors Jouhki, Jukka; Steel, Tytti Pages 81–125 Publisher Ethnos ∗[email protected]; ORCiD: 0000-0002-9034-9761 CO-LABORATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY: CRAFTING REFLEXIVITIES EXPERIMENTALLY Jörg Niewöhner The Finnish translation of this piece has been published in: Jukka Jouhki and Tytti Steel (2016) Ethnologinen tulkinta ja analyysi. Kohti avoimempaa tutkimusprosessia. Ethnos, Helsinki: 81-125. Introduction: why co-laborate? Anthropology is concerned with liVed sociality, i.e. humans liVing in groups. It wants to understand how humans arrange themselVes within particular environments as well as the dynamics of these arrangements. This is a straightForward research question – and a grand challenge. It is particularly grand For social and cultural anthropologists considering that they tend to work alone with little more support than a Field notebook and a pencil. It is thus perhaps disciplinary prudence that most practitioners of anthropology today consider addressing this question futile if not dangerous. The history of anthropology shows how attempts at grand explanations or narratiVes remain contingent and ethically disputable. Practitioners Feel more comFortable in their respectiVe specialty niches.
    [Show full text]
  • Haney Foundation Series : Ethnography in Today's World : Color
    Ethnography in Today’s World ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:34 PS PAGE i HANEY FOUNDATION SERIES A volume in the Haney Foundation Series, established in 1961 with the generous support of Dr. John Louis Haney ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:34 PS PAGE ii Ethnography in Today’s World Color Full Before Color Blind Roger Sanjek UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PRESS PHILADELPHIA ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:34 PS PAGE iii Copyright ᭧ 2014 University of Pennsylvania Press All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of review or scholarly citation, none of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher. Published by University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112 www.upenn.edu/pennpress Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10987654321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sanjek, Roger, 1944– Ethnography in today’s world : color full before color blind / Roger Sanjek.—1st ed. p. cm. — (Haney foundation series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8122-4545-5 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Ethnology—United States—Methodology. 2. Ethnology—Methodology. 3. Anthropology—United States—Methodology. 4. Anthropology—Methodology. I. Title. GN345.S255 2014 305.800973—dc23 2013019444 ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:35 PS PAGE iv For my teachers: Anne Schwerner, Robert Stigler, Marvin Harris, Lambros Comitas, Jaap van Velsen, George C. Bond, Allen Johnson ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:35 PS PAGE v This page intentionally left blank Contents Preface ix PART I.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Anthropology?
    Decolonisation, modernisation, globalisation, the crisis of Karl-Heinz Kohl Holger Jebens & representation, and the ‘cultural turn’ in neighbouring disciplines have unsettled anthropology to such an extent that the field’s The end of foundations, the subjects of its study as well as its methods and concepts, appear to be eroded. anthropology? It is now time to take stock and either abandon anthropology as a fundamentally untenable or superfluous project, or to set it on more solid foundations. In this volume some of the edited by Holger Jebens & Karl-Heinz Kohl world’s leading anthropologists – including Vincent Crapanzano, Maurice Godelier, Ulf Hannerz and Adam Kuper – do just that. Reflecting on how to meet the manifold institutional, theoretical, methodological, and epistemological challenges to the field, The End of Anthropology? as well as on the continued, if not heightened, importance of anthropology in a world where diversity and cultural difference are becoming ever more important economically, politically, and legally, they set upon the task of reconstructing anthropology’s foundations and firming up its stance vis-à-vis these challenges. ‘With a backward glance at earlier predictions of the demise of anthropology, the essays present a confident account of the future of the discipline. Defining in clear terms what it is that anthropologists do, a well-chosen group of distinguished contributors confront the diversity and internal distinctions that characterize the field, weigh the seriousness of the trend toward interdisciplinary studies in the human sciences, and redefine the strengths of the anthropological mode of knowledge production’. (Shirley Lindenbaum, Professor Emerita, City University of New York) Holger Jebens is Senior Research Fellow at the Frobenius Institute and Managing Editor of Paideuma.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Robert P. Weller and Keping Wu Th e passing of Fredrik Barth marked the end of an era in anthropology. Nev- ertheless, his contributions also promise new beginnings. As his students and colleagues, we felt nothing could honor our debts to him more than an intellec- tual eff ort that brings attention to his relevance to anthropology today, rather than simply celebrating his legacy. Th is volume attempts to do that by off ering chapters that expand on his work, sometimes argue with it, but always honor its humanist approach. In the process, the book may also serve as a summary of some of his main themes, and it may illustrate how much we owe him intellec- tually, but our main goal is neither intellectual biography nor commemoration. It is instead to pass on Barth’s humanistic tradition of knowledge, so it can live and evolve.1 Such a process of continuous intellectual evolution characterized Barth’s own career as well. In the late 1970s, when Robert attended his graduate sem- inar at Johns Hopkins, Barth was already highly celebrated. Th is was above all because of his introductory essay in Ethnic Groups and Boundaries (1969), which had appeared a decade earlier. Th ough Barth repeatedly said that he was not an expert on ethnicity, this essay fundamentally shifted the way people conceptualize ethnicity—from “cultural stuff ” to the boundaries actors set out to maintain. However, instead of dwelling on his fame or reiterating his earlier ideas, it was clear that Barth at that time was wrestling with new issues, espe- cially with the problem of how to understand a person as both a potentially cre- ative individual and as a product of broader social processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Kids in Vienna: a Contribution to the Anthropology of Urban Youth
    DISSERTATION Titel der Dissertation “We’re Doing It in the Park!” Park Kids in Vienna: A Contribution to the Anthropology of Urban Youth Verfasserin Mag. Danila Mayer angestrebter akademischer Grad Doktorin der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) Wien, 2010 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 092 307 Dissertationsgebiet lt. Studienblatt: Kultur- und Sozialanthropologie Betreuer: Univ.- Prof. Dr. Andre Gingrich 2 Acknowledgements I am grateful to all my former colleagues and the Verein Wiener Jugendzentren. My gratitude goes to Professor Ghaus Ansari who introduced me to Urban Anthropology and to studies of the Windy City, and to Andre Gingrich who supported me on long and winding roads. Thanks to all who let me share the park life, And to my other friends. The title of this study comes from the Blackbyrds’ song Rock Creek Park from the album City Life, Fantasy 1975: “We’re doing it in the park, we’re doing it after dark …”. Donald Byrd (né Donaldson Toussaint L’Ouverture Byrd II), hard bop trumpeter in the 1950s and 1960s, formed the group in Washington D.C. in 1973, from his best students at Howard University. The song has been sampled by many music and rap groups, e.g. by the Rock Steady Crew on their album 30 years to the day, Noiseland 2007. The Rock Steady Crew from the South Bronx, early break dance pioneers, are well-known from the movie Wild Style and the early rap movement, and joined Afrika Bambaata’s Zulu Nation in 1982. Breakers are Mr. Freeze, Frosty Freeze, Crazy Legs, and Prince Ken Swift. 3 Table of Contents A.
    [Show full text]
  • UNC Chapel Hill Department of Anthropology Volume 6 No. 1 Spring 2001 Please Send Your Email Address to <Anarchaey.Notes@Unc
    UNC Chapel Hill Department of Anthropology Volume 6 No. 1 Spring 2001 Please Send Your Email address to <[email protected] > in this issue: Where is the Field Going? Notes from the Field: Tanzania & Denmark Obituaries: Tom Hargrove & Joffre Coe Society for Anthropology Students Some Views of Instructional Technologies News From the RLA Interview with the Chair: "Really Excited About This Department" In this issue of Anarchaey Notes, we are foregoing our past custom of asking the Chair to write a special column, "Notes from the Chair," simply because it has been almost impossible for Dorothy (Dottie) Holland, our Department Chair, to find time to write it, given her torrid schedule of Chairly commitments and activities. (Did we mention she has also been a formidable researcher, writer, advisor, and teacher while serving as Chair?) Instead, in March 2001, your redoubtable Editorial crew (Don Nonini and Seth Murray) caught up with Dottie Holland to interview her for a few calm minutes in her otherwise hectic and drama-filled day. Don Nonini: Dottie, good afternoon. What do you think the most important changes have been in the Department of Anthropology during the five years of your tenure as Chair? Dorothy Holland: Well, let me say that I think this [interview] is a great idea, and it's much better than "Notes from the Chair". What I think has happened, for one thing, we've added nine new faculty. We have a reasonable and stable TA [teaching assistant] budget. There are other things too but I'll mention some things that I think are distinctive.
    [Show full text]
  • Swedish Journal of Anthropology
    kritiskSWEDISH JOURNAL OF etnoANTHROPOLOGY gra2018, 1(1) ISSN: 2003-1173 kritisk etnografi – Swedish Journal of Anthropology About kritisk etnografi – Swedish Journal of Anthropology is owned and published by Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography (Svenska Sällskapet för Antropologi och Geografi). The journal is peer-reviewed, online, and publishes original research articles, as well as reports from the Swedish anthropological community. kritisk etnografi aims to foster responsible scholarship with global scope, local relevance and public engagement. Websites www.ssag.se www.kritisketnografi.se Editors Sten Hagberg, Uppsala University Jörgen Hellman, University of Gothenburg Editorial Committee Gudrun Dahl, Stockholm University Tova Höjdestrand, Lund University Ivana Maček, Stockholm University Paula Uimonen, Stockholm University Charlotta Widmark, Uppsala University Design, layout and typesetting Mats Hyvönen, Uppsala University Address kritisk etnografi – Swedish Journal of Anthropology c/o Sten Hagberg Dept. of Cultural Anthropology and Ethnology Thunbergsvägen 3H, PO Box 631 SE-751 26 Uppsala Sweden Email [email protected] URN urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-355996 Contents Foreword Thomas Borén Fostering Engaged and Responsible Scholarship: Global Scope, Local Relevance and Public Engagement Sten Hagberg & Jörgen Hellman .......................................................................................7 The Public Presence of Anthropology: A Critical Approach Didier Fassin ...................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded From: Ebooks.Adelaide.Edu.Au/D/Descartes/Rene/D44dm/Part2.Html, Sept
    A History of Anthropology Eriksen HOA3 00 pre 1 16/04/2013 16:04 Anthropology, Culture and Society Series Editors: Professor Vered Amit, Concordia University and Dr Jon P. Mitchell, University of Sussex Published titles include: Claiming Individuality: Discordant Development: The Aid Effect: The Cultural Politics of Global Capitalism and the Giving and Governing in Distinction Struggle for Connection in International Development EDITED BY VERED AMIT AND Bangladesh EDITED BY DavID MOSSE AND NOEL DYCK KATY GARDNER DavID LEWIS Community, Cosmopolitanism Anthropology, Development Cultivating Development: and the Problem of Human and the Post-Modern An Ethnography of Aid Policy Commonality Challenge and Practice VERED AMIT AND KATY GARDNER AND DavID MOSSE NIGEL RAPPORT DavID LEWIS Contesting Publics Home Spaces, Street Styles: Border Watch: Feminism, Activism, Contesting Power and Identity Cultures of Immigration, Ethnography in a South African City Detention and Control LYNNE PHILLIPS AND SALLY COLE LESLIE J. BANK ALEXANDRA HALL Terror and Violence: In Foreign Fields: Corruption: Imagination and the The Politics and Experiences Anthropological Perspectives Unimaginable of Transnational Sport EDITED BY DIETER HALLER AND EDITED BY ANDREW STRATHERN, Migration CRIS SHORE PAMELA J. STEWART AND THOMAS F. CARTER Anthropology’s World: NEIL L. WHITEHEAD On the Game: Life in a Twenty-First Century Anthropology, Art and Women and Sex Work Discipline Cultural Production SOPHIE DAY ULF HANNERZ MAruškA SvašEK Slave of Allah: Humans and Other Animals Race
    [Show full text]
  • Among the Foreign Correspondents: Reflections on Anthropological Styles and Audiences
    A mong the Foreign Correspondents 5 7 Among the Foreign Correspondents: Reflections on Anthropological Styles and Audiences Ulf Hannerz Stockholm University, Sweden ABSTRACT The interface between anthropology and journalism is drawing increasing attention. Newsmedia foreign correspondents, in particular, are engaged in a pursuit parallel to that of classical anthropology, reporting from one part of the world to another. Yet they work under very different organizational circumstances and relate differently to time and space. Drawing on examples from the work of ‘Africa corre- spondents’, the paper discusses the possibilities of personal initative in reporting. It also notes the role of the newsmedia in shaping public engagements with the world, and comments on the part of anthropological writing in influencing public culture. KEYWORDS Journalism, ethnography, anthropological writing, public culture ndeed it may be true, as the introduction to this collection of essays has it, that what we are doing nowadays would barely be recognizable to our I ancestors in anthropology, to Franz Boas or to Bronislaw Malinowski. But with a move that at least Malinowski might have found familiar, let me begin by taking you to one particular somewhat remote locale. You are in Richmond, a small suburban enclave a little to the west of central Johannes- burg, South Africa, close to two main thoroughfares. As you turn off Stanley Road at the shop sign of the London Pie Company, and go slightly downhill along Menton Road, you will find Richmond quiet and a bit nondescript. There are some commercial establishments — a couple of car dealers, a com- puter equipment business, a photocopy and fax service, a liquor store, a small restaurant, and a couple of modest shops selling newspapers and sundry gro- ceries.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Report 2010 –2011 Volume II (Appendix)
    Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Report 2010 - 2011 Volume II (Appendix) Halle /Saale Imprint Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Report 2010 –2011 Volume II (Appendix) Published by Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle /Saale P. O. Box 11 03 51 D - 06017 Halle /Saale Germany Phone: +49 (0) 345 2927- 0 http://www.eth.mpg.de Editorial Board: Jennifer Cash, John Eidson, Bettina Mann, Martin Ramstedt assisted by: Gesine Koch, Kristin Magnucki, Ralph Orlowski, Berit Westwood, Viktoria Zeng Cover Photo: Paper effigies at Thuong Temple, Lao Cai, Vietnam, 2010. © Kirsten W. Endres Printed 2012 by IMPRESS Druckerei, Halle /Saale Responsibility for the content of the contributions lies with the individual authors. © 2012 Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology ISSN 1618-8683 Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Report 2010 – 2011 Volume II (Appendix) Halle/Saale Table of Contents iii Table of Contents Structure and Organisation of the Institute 2010–2011 1 Junior Scientists and Guest Scientists 7 Finalised Habilitations and Dissertations 7 Visiting Scholars 10 Scientific Awards and Memberships 14 Scientific Awards 14 Professional Memberships 14 Editorships 22 Transfer of Knowledge 24 Cooperation with National and International Research Institutions 26 Professorships 26 Cooperation 27 Teaching 29 PhD Examinations 35 Symposia, Conferences, etc. 38 Conferences and Workshops 38 Joint Institutes Colloquia 53 Talks 2010 /2011 at the Institute 56 Anthropological Workshop /Werkstatt Ethnologie 59 Lectures 62 Presentations at Conferences and Workshops 70 Public Relations Work 108 Public Talks and Outreach 108 Equal Opportunities and Support of Scientists 114 Index 116 Location of the Institute 120 Structure and Organisation of the Institute 1 Structure and Organisation of the Institute 2010–2011 Because questions concerning the equivalence of academic titles that are conferred by institutions of higher learning in different countries have still not been resolved completely, all academic titles have been omitted from this report.
    [Show full text]