Raven 28 Long Tieng, Mar 1970-May 1970

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Raven 28 Long Tieng, Mar 1970-May 1970 John Fuller, Raven 28 Long Tieng, Mar 1970-May 1970 It would be a bad two months for those flying near Long Tieng. The North Vietnamese and Pathet Lao had moved south to the other side of Skyline Ridge. Sam Thong and almost every site north had been overrun. Ground fire, weather, and the demands of flying long hours were as bad as ever. Maybe it was just that the bad phi, bad Hmong spirits, had been hiding and now showed up with a vengeance. At the end of March 1970, two Ravens took off from Vientiane, headed north for Long Tieng, and disappeared. That was the day before I showed up. Then an Air America C-130, making a routine descent through the weather into Long Tieng, crashed into Phou Bai mountain, killing all six onboard. They impacted just below the 9,250-foot peak. At the end of April, two more Ravens took a 37 mm round through the wing of their U-17, could not keep flying, and crashed just east of the Plaine des Jarres. They could not be recovered. One month later, I was shot down, picked up by an Air America Huey, and medevacked to the States. The only one lucky enough to make it home. Prologue “History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.” Winston Churchill I arrived for Project 404 at Udorn Air Base, Thailand, in March 1970. I had just completed eight months flying from Pleiku AB in Vietnam with the 20th Tactical Air Support Squadron (TASS), call sign Covey. We “crossed the fence” daily into southern Laos. Our primary mission was Steel Tiger, the southern part of the US interdiction program on the Ho Chi Minh Trail. The overall process seemed to be that the Soviets provided all the trucks in the world to the North Vietnamese, who then dispersed and sent them south through the many capillaries of the Trail. The USAF, Navy, and Army would then wander purposefully through the night, trying every type of technology the US could think of, to find and blow up each individual truck, soldier, or local civilian pressed into service hauling material south to the fight. I flew the O-2 on those nights, with a navigator in the right seat, hanging his head almost out the open window with an AN/PVS 2 Starlight scope. Most of the “navs” were senior to us young pilots; they deserved a medal for just strapping in with us. We droned through the night, searching for trucks, which were difficult to find even on a good night. The AAA (antiaircraft artillery) was pretty easy to see, however, as it tried to find us. Bernard C. Nalty wrote at the end of his book, The War Against Trucks: Aerial Interdiction in Southern Laos 1968-1972, that “without precise knowledge of the carefully concealed network of roads and trails, pipelines and streams, the Air Force in Southeast Asia could not direct its weapons, many of them ill-suited for the job at hand, against North Vietnamese troops and supplies in southern Laos or assess accurately the damage that was done. In short, the airmen spent almost five years and billions of dollars trying with courage, determination, and ingenuity to do the impossible.” He failed to mention the people who lost their lives in this pursuit, but I get his point. No source I am aware of estimates we ever stopped more than 15 percent of material flowing south. In August of 1969, John LeHecka and I first flew into Pleiku in a Covey O-2 sent to get us at DaNang, the 20th TASS headquarters. We were each on our first operational assignment. My personal call sign became Covey 579; his became 580. John had a few years on me, as he had spent a tour in the Peace Corps near what is now Bangladesh. He was married, and was a bit more settled than most of us first lieutenants. About five months after arrival, and after logging many night hours, we were selected at nearly the same time to fly the Prairie Fire (PF) mission, supporting long-range reconnaissance patrols (LRRPs) near the trail structure in Laos. It was Covey’s most demanding mission; not everyone was asked to join the program or opted in when asked. I don’t know how, but we had made the cut. It was very very Top Secret, since we would be putting American troops on the ground in Laos, which President Nixon adamantly denied. Maybe nobody told him. Prairie Fire pilots would fly with an experienced “Covey Rider” in the right seat. He was typically an Army Special Forces NCO or junior officer who had several tours in Vietnam running the LRRPs into Laos, North Vietnam, and Cambodia. We controlled Army UH-1 Hueys and AH-1 Cobras, Vietnamese H-34s, call sign Kingbee, and USAF A-1s during insertion and extraction of these teams. Teams consisted of about three Americans and nine indigenous Montagnards or Vietnamese or covertly imported Chinese Nungs. “Typical” Prairie Fire team. Fourth from left is Ken Bowra, with whom I served at JSOC in the mid-80s. Ken retired in 2003 as a major general. Snake eater does good! These Americans were assigned to the Studies and Observation Group (SOG) and were some of the toughest, most resourceful, and highly decorated soldiers in the war; we respected them highly. Consequently, we engaged in some high-risk flying for them. The teams conducted reconnaissance along the trail, captured prisoners, and on occasion their Bright Light teams were inserted to find downed airmen or missing team members. When the country is in danger, the military’s mission is to wreak destruction upon the enemy. It’s a harsh and bloody business, but that’s what the military’s for. As George Orwell pointed out, people sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. Adrian Grenier Some of these special operators went on to found the Army’s Tier One special operations counterterrorist unit. Others, like Ken, become “plank holders” at the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), serving in the initial four years of its existence. I’m a “plank holder” myself, but I’m not even in the same species as these guys. I’ll carry their water any day. John L. Plaster, a Prairie Fire veteran, has written several books describing the Prairie Fire program. One of his books, Secret Commandos: Behind Enemy Lines with the Elite Warriors of SOG, describes my friend John LeHecka’s last mission. On that day, January 10, 1970, John and I flew together to Kontum, a forward operating base for the teams. John was scheduled to fly a mission with Covey Rider “Haymaker.” Years later I learned his name was James “Sam” Zumbrun, a sergeant first class, on his third tour. He had already received the Silver Star, three Bronze Stars, and three Purple Hearts. All the PF riders wore sterile fatigues, as did the troops we inserted. PF Coveys quickly learned their call signs, but little personal history, or even their real names. I stayed at Kontum Ops that day and they flew in support of a company-sized Hatchet Force near the tri-border area, where Cambodia, Laos, and South Vietnam meet. I was in the Tactical Ops Center (TOC) when a team on the ground relayed that Covey 580 had crashed near their location. The Army put a small team into the crash site. It appeared that John had been shot and neither he nor Haymaker could recover the aircraft before crashing. The recovery team had difficulty removing them from the wreckage, but eventually returned John, and later Haymaker, to Kontum. I remember the body bags on the Ops Center concrete floor, while we tried to continue the necessary business of the moment. It’s hard to even imagine in my comfortable life today. John’s body was returned to Pleiku and properly processed before being flown home. Flying in the war “across the fence,” aircrews who crashed were rarely recovered. I doubt John’s widow Charlotte and family took much comfort in John’s rapid return. What none of us knew at the time was that some “recoveries,” when they did happen, wouldn’t happen until over 40 years later. I went back to flying Prairie Fire in southern Laos and occasionally Cambodia. The best strafing I ever saw was from an F-4 out of Thailand. Our team was on the run and I got an F-4E, call sign Gunfighter, overhead within minutes thanks to Hillsborough, the Airborne Command and Control Center (ABCCC). It or its nighttime equivalent was airborne over southern Laos 24/7. We couldn’t see the team’s exact location due to the triple-canopy jungle, and the team was running too hard to use a mirror. They did tell us their general direction of travel. The team leader threw a smoke can over his shoulder and kept on running. As soon as we saw his smoke, I cleared Gunfighter in, perpendicular to the team’s reported direction of travel. It worked and they broke contact. BUT, given the vagaries of smoke rising through dense jungle, the possibility for miscommunication, and the physics of spewing 20 mm high explosive rounds at the rate of 100/second from treetop level at 450+ knots made the whole enterprise pretty sketchy – For Emergency Use Only. Judging by the three helmets, and the attitude, I suspect I was headed on a routine administrative run to DaNang.
Recommended publications
  • Operation Barrel Roll
    In 1962, the United States began a “secret war” in Laos. The operation wasn’t revealed until 1970, by which time it con- sumed half of all US attack sorties in Southeast Asia. Barrel Roll By John T. Correll n early 1961, the hot spot of lead- ing concern in Southeast Asia was not Vietnam but Laos. The new US President, John IF. Kennedy, rated Laos as “the most im- mediate of the problems that we found upon taking office” in January. On March 23, Kennedy held a news conference, nationally televised, to talk about Laos. He pointed out the communist advance on a large map. The Pathet Lao insur- gents, supported by the Russians and the North Vietnamese, had captured the northeastern part of the country. “Laos is far away from America, but the world is small,” Kennedy said. “The security of all Southeast Asia will be endangered if Laos loses its neutral independence. Its own safety runs with the safety of us all, in real neutrality observed by all.” In itself, Laos had little strategic im- portance. It was remote and landlocked, with a population of only two million. However, it shared borders with six other countries and had traditionally served as a buffer zone between the more powerful neighboring states. Thousands of ancient stone jars dot the plains in the center of Laos. The real concern about Laos was that the insurgency would spread and destabilize the rest of the region. “If the group, about 750 people, left promptly, pilots flying air support for the Laotian communists [are] able to move in and but no more than 40 of the 7,000 North ground forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Webb, Jack OH222
    Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral History Interview with JOHN A. WEBB Air Controller, Air Force, Career and Vietnam War. 1999 OH 222 OH 222 Webb, John (Jack) A., (1936- ). Oral History Interview, 1999. User Copy: 2 sound cassettes (ca. 78 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Master Copy: 1 sound cassette (ca. 78 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Transcript: 0.1 linear ft. (1 folder). Abstract: John "Jack" A. Webb, a Durand, Wisconsin native, discusses his career in the Air Force, including service in Asia during the Vietnam War and the Cold War. Webb mentions his family’s military history, enlisting in 1954, and his military training, including work with radar and with electronic countermeasure systems for B-47s. He touches on volunteering for Combat Control, going through jump school, and joining a team at Hurlburt Field (Florida) in 1963. Webb outlines his career and states he served in Laos and Nakhon Phanom (Thailand) between 1964 and 1966, as well as in Korea and in Japan after the USS Pueblo Incident. He discusses taking different types of Special Forces training, including jungle survival in Panama and infiltrating a CIA base. He speaks of “Operation Water Pump/Project 404”: living at Vang Pao’s secret headquarters at Long Tieng (Laos), duties as an air controller working in conjunction with the Laos military, and officially being a member of the U.S. Embassy rather than an Air Force employee. Webb expresses regret that when he went to Laos, little was known about Hmong culture and everyone called the Hmong a derogatory term without knowing better.
    [Show full text]
  • Present-Day Effects of United States Bombing of Laos During the Vietnam War: Can Injured Laotians Recover Under the Federal Tort Claims Act
    Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Volume 13 Number 1 International Business Law Conference: Investment and Trade with the Article 11 Republic of China 10-1-1990 Present-Day Effects of United States Bombing of Laos during the Vietnam War: Can Injured Laotians Recover under the Federal Tort Claims Act Kenneth P. Kingshill Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kenneth P. Kingshill, Present-Day Effects of United States Bombing of Laos during the Vietnam War: Can Injured Laotians Recover under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 13 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 133 (1990). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol13/iss1/11 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Present-Day Effects of United States Bombing of Laos During the Vietnam War: Can Injured Laotians Recover Under the Federal Tort Claims Act? From break of day Till sunset glow I toil. I dig my well I plow my field, And earn my food and drink. What care I Who rules the land If I Am left in peace? Anonymous (Chinese, 2300 B.C.)' The roar of the bombs and the noise of the planesfrightened me terribly.
    [Show full text]
  • Air America in Laos II – Military Aid by Dr
    Air America in Laos II – military aid by Dr. Joe F. Leeker Part II First published on 29 May 2006, last updated on 24 August 2015 I) Air America in Laos: military and paramilitary aid 1968-1973 Madriver operations 1968-73 During the 1968-73 period, the original Madriver contract had been transformed into contract no. F62531-67-0028 for Fiscal Years 68, 69, and 70 on 1 July 67, but as before, this contract covered flying services to be provided by an ever growing number of Udorn-based UH-34Ds plus the operation of one C-47 out of Bangkok, apparently a courier aircraft.1 On 1 July 70, that contract was followed by contract no. F04606-71-C-0002 that covered the Udorn-based UH-34Ds, the Bangkok-based C-47 plus a Udorn-based Volpar, apparently another courier aircraft.2 That contract is much more complex, as it does not only cover flying services to be performed by the UH-34Ds and the 2 transport planes, but also drop-in maintenance of Raven O-1 and U-17 aircraft, crash / battle damage repair to DEPCHIEF- managed T-28s, support services to the Khmer Air Force and a lot of other operation and maintenance services. But apart from the prices, section XIV dealing with “Flying Services for Government furnished UH-34 aircraft (Item 1)” is not much different from similar sections in earlier versions of the Madriver contract.3 So it can be assumed that the types of missions flown by Air America’s UH-34Ds were still more or less the same as those described for the pre-1968 period.
    [Show full text]
  • PROBLEMS of WAR VICTIMS in INDOCHINA Part II: CAMBODIA and LAOS
    PROBLEMS OF WAR VICTIMS IN INDOCHINA Part II: CAMBODIA AND LAOS HEARING BEFORE' 'I'HE SUBOOMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE .PROBLEMS" CONNEOTED WITH REFUGEES AND ESCAPEES,: . OI!' THI~ , COMMITTEE ON THE J1J'DICIARY"'; '.'" . UNITED ~TATES SENAT;E NINETY-SECOND 'CONGRESS SEOOND'SESSION.· .' .':1 ,'. " :. ,"" ~.' .; ,', ,'; " .- t Printed for tbe use of the Committee on the Judiciary . U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OItFICE 79-lISS WASHtNGTON : 1972 . COMMITTEE. ON THE. ,JUDICIARY , , , ' . ;'_,; ':1 ,·,fJA¥l~S. O. EASTLAND, Miijslss1p~!. Ol~atrtn~, JO:aN'·L.-M'CCUIDLLAN. Arlift'u$Qs ' ROMAN t. HRUSK~, N6braskQ' cl~¥-J~ ~RV~N;,.JR".Not.th.9afolina HIRAl!d: L. FO~G, Hawaii PI1I{.JF:,A. HAltT"Mlchl'gM ;' : HUGH SCOTT i,Pennsylvania EDWARD M. KElNNEDY," Mnssachusetts 8'1'R01\£ THURMOND, 'South Carolina BIRCH BA,YH. Indiana , ,MARLOW W. COOK, Kentucky QUENTIN N. BURDICK, North Dakota CHARLES MeC. MATHIAS. JR., Maryland ROBERT C.'BYl'!'>. )1"1' ylr'lnl~ ': ]jJD'o/AilD J;.Gl)RN1!!".,])l9rldil JOHNV,TUN'NEn\caiHoblbt- ' "C"·" .. ,I"."" _., ;,' SUBCOMMITTEE TO i~I~~'BTIG~TE PBQBtJilM8 CoNNEo'TED! ~ir REFUGEES AND • < " ESOAP)nES ~,-; , ,.-, ,-) ~.) ,,' ,:' - ,- . EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetta, Chai~man JOHN L. McCLELLAN, Arkansas ·z' ., ,,~Bl),JI'A.M\L.:'FONG, Uawall FHILlr A. HART, Michigan CHARLES MCC;:MATHIAS, JR., Maryland DALII S"DIII HAAN"OOtm8tll JERRY M. TINKIIIR, Staff Oon8tdtant (n) CONTENTS Statement of- Pa~ Roderic L. O'Connor, Coordinator for Supporting Assistanc~} Agency for International Development; accompanied by Hon. William H. Sullivan, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of East Asian and PacifiQ Affairlij" Department of State; and Maj. Curtis G. Cook- USAF, Office of International Seourity Affairs, Department of Defense; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 GENERAL VANG PAO: a Review of Reputable Sources [15 May 2007]
    1 GENERAL VANG PAO: A Review of Reputable Sources [15 May 2007] by Alfred W. McCoy, Professor of Southeast Asian History, UW Madison In assessing the merits of the Madison School Board’s decision to name a school General Vang Pao, there are four factors that might give one pause--allegations that Vang Pao ordered summary executions, press reports that his army conscripted boy soldiers as young as 10 years old for combat, reports that his army’s command was involved in the Laos opium traffic, and press reports of financial fraud in Hmong-American welfare associations affiliated with him. In aftermath of the Vietnam War, books by authors ranging from the staunchly pro-Vang Pao Jane Hamilton-Merritt to Christian missionary William Smalley and commercial author Christopher Robbins have been unanimous in reporting that Vang Pao ordered extra-judicial executions of enemy prisoners, his own Hmong soldiers, and Hmong political opponents. All base these allegations, which have been repeated in recent press reports, on interviews with eyewitnesses, which include CIA operatives, American pilots for the CIA-owned Air America, and Hmong whose communities supported the CIA’s Secret Army. In the latter stages of the Vietnam War, 1971-73, General Vang Pao’s CIA army reportedly recruited children from ages 10 to 14 years-old to serve as boy soldiers in brutal combat with extraordinarily high casualties. Moreover, there are several sources, citing first-hand accounts from former CIA officials, alleging that the Secret Army’s command was involved in the Laos’s opium traffic, particularly in the transport of opium out of Hmong villages on the CIA’s airline Air America.
    [Show full text]
  • A RAVEN CHRONICLE: TALES from NEVERLAND the Experiences of 1St Lt Smoky Greene, USAF, As Raven 42 in Northern Laos
    Smoky Greene, Raven 42 Long Tieng, Jul 1969 – Feb 1970 A RAVEN CHRONICLE: TALES FROM NEVERLAND The experiences of 1st Lt Smoky Greene, USAF, as Raven 42 in Northern Laos Author’s Note: Some have read my account and offered alternative wording or factual corrections. I have considered all these comments carefully and incorporated changes where I judged them to improve accuracy. But absent convincing evidence, I have not allowed my own memory to be trumped by someone else’s memory. Thus some may judge my story inaccurate – but this is the way I remember these events. Preface As I write this at the tail end of 2013, many of my memories of my time in Laos 43 years ago have faded, though a few remain sharp and colorful as if they happened yesterday. Having retired some years ago, with spare time to spread 70 years out on the table and assess my life to date (a potentially depressing exercise), I can’t help but envy the young aviation adventurer I once was. When people ask me if I miss flying, I have lately begun to reply that I miss being 25. In 1970 I had just completed my Raven tour and embarked on a single-seat fighter career that would span another 25 years and thousands of flying hours in the venerable F-100, the A-7D, the RAF Harrier, and the A-10. By any measure I enjoyed quite an enviable flying career, but on reflection my six months in Laos as 24-year-old Raven 42 trumps all the rest in ways difficult to understand myself much less explain to others.
    [Show full text]
  • Indochina War Refugee Movements in Laos, 1954-1975
    Indochina War Refugee Movements in Laos, 1954–1975: A Chronological Overview Citing New Primary Sources Frederic C. Benson1 Abstract This paper outlines the history of the relief and resettlement assistance program established by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) to assist civilians displaced during the Second Indochina War in Laos. Many of the primary source materials cited in this paper can be found in a digitized collection of reports and documents that was recently made available in the University of Wisconsin’s Southeast Asian Images & Texts (SEAiT) digital collection. A fundamentally humanitarian undertaking, the USAID refugee program ultimately became a significant part of a larger, integrated political-military engagement, in which the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) played a significant role. The objective of this paper is to summarize the complexities of the USAID refugee program as it developed from January 1955, when the American embassy was opened in Vientiane, until the Second Indochina War came to an end and USAID was evicted from Laos in June 1975, the year in which the Lao Democratic People’s Republic (Lao PDR) was established. Viewed in historical and geographical contexts, population shifts within the hinterlands of Laos, which peaked during the war, continue into the present post-conflict period. This has been due in part to more recent interactions and struggles prompted by “political memories” of the Second Indochina War alignments, which have led, to an extent, to post-1975, anti-Lao PDR insurgencies and land (re)allocations that address security concerns and accommodate both foreign land-based investments and cross- border migrations.
    [Show full text]
  • AIR AMERICA - COOPERATION with OTHER AIRLINES by Dr
    AIR AMERICA - COOPERATION WITH OTHER AIRLINES by Dr. Joe F. Leeker First published on 23 August 2010, last updated on 24 August 2015 1) Within the family: The Pacific Corporation and its parts In a file called “Air America - cooperation with other airlines”, one might first think of Civil Air Transport Co Ltd or Air Asia Co Ltd. These were not really other airlines, however, but part of the family that had been created in 1955, when the old CAT Inc. had received a new corporate structure. On 28 February 55, CAT Inc transferred the Chinese airline services to Civil Air Transport Company Limited (CATCL), which had been formed on 20 January 55, and on 1 March 55, CAT Inc officially transferred the ownership of all but 3 of the Chinese registered aircraft to Asiatic Aeronautical Company Limited, selling them to Asiatic Aeronautical (AACL) for one US Dollar per aircraft.1 The 3 aircraft not transferred to AACL were to be owned by and registered to CATCL – one of the conditions under which the Government of the Republic of China had approved the two-company structure.2 So, from March 1955 onwards, we have 2 official owners of the fleet: Most aircraft were officially owned by Asiatic Aeronautical Co Ltd, which changed its name to Air Asia Co Ltd on 1 April 59, but three aircraft – mostly 3 C-46s – were always owned by Civil Air Transport Co Ltd. US registered aircraft of the family like C-54 N2168 were officially owned by the holding company – the Airdale Corporation, which changed its name to The Pacific Corporation on 7 October 57 – or by CAT Inc., which changed its name to Air America on 3 31 March 59, as the organizational chart of the Pacific Corporation given below shows.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs Hearing on Legislative
    U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Hearing On Legislative Presentations of Veterans Service Organizations & March 05, 2015 & March 18, 2015 -- Testimony of Philip Smith, Washington, D.C. Director & Liaison Lao Veterans of America, Inc. & Executive Director, Center for Public Policy Analysis ----------------- We sincerely wish to thank Chairman Johnny Isakson, Vice Chairman Richard Blumenthal, and each and every one of the Committee Members of the U.S. Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee for holding this important hearing today regarding the legislative presentations of Veterans Service Organizations (VS0s). We appreciate your concern about the plight of Lao- and Hmong- American veterans who served alongside U.S. clandestine and military forces during the Vietnam War, in defense of U.S. national security interests and the Royal Kingdom of Laos. We are also grateful for the efforts of former Chairman Bernard “Bernie” Sanders, and former Vice Chairman Richard Burr, of this Committee, in the previous Congress, for their recent leadership efforts in support of Lao and Hmong veterans, and their families in the United States, especially regarding S. 200 /S. 2337 / H.R. 3369, the “Hmong Veterans' Service Recognition Act” (also known as “The Lao & Hmong Veterans’ Burial Honors Bill”, in its various legislative incarnations, and its inclusion into various omnibus veterans bills in the previous session of Congress). We also wish to express our deep gratitude to Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, for her crucial leadership efforts, along with Congressman Jim Costa of California, in the House of Representatives, for introducing S. 200 /H.R. 3369 /S. 2337 in the previous Congress and helping to advance the legislation in a bipartisan manner in both the Senate and House, and before this Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Special Guerrilla Units (SGU) Service History
    The Special Guerrilla Units (SGU) Service History Presented by the Special Guerrilla Units Veterans and Families of USA, Inc. Enclosed is a brief background of information on the establishment of our SGU and Families of USA, Inc. We, the members of this non-profit organization, are military veterans who provided arm-services to the United States of America during the Cold War era in Southeast Asia. We served and fought on behalf of the United States inside Laos. We are proud to present you this synopsis of how the SGU was created by the United States’ CIA to participate in the Secret War inside Laos, as part of the Vietnam War. Map of Laos. The red arrows and circles represent the territory occupied by SGU forces where the red line running south is the Ho Chi Minh Trail. 2 I NTRODUCT I ON After WWII, China closed its doors to foreigners and built an alliance with Communist Russia. The two super power countries attempted to conquer Asia and Southeast Asia. Meanwhile the Westerners were preparing to return home in peace and give independence to the French-Indo China countries as the North Vietnamese Vietminh defeated the French at Dien Bien Phu in 1954. Subsequently, Laos was newly established as an independent and neutral state by the 1954 Geneva Accord. To protect United States’ principal interests in Asia, President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent the CIA to look for friendly allies and began to send troops into South Vietnam, including the United States Air Force and Navy to the South China Sea in the late 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Wisconsin- Eau Claire a History Of
    THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN- EAU CLAIRE A HISTORY OF HMONG MEN: PEB LEEJ TXIV LUB NEEJ (OUR FATHERS’ LIVES) DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY KHONG MENG HER SUPERVISING PROFESSOR: JOSEPH ORSER COORPERATING PROFESSOR: REIKO SHINNO EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN DECEMBER 2013 Copyright of this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, with the consent of the author. CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………..ii Acknowledgement…………………………………………….iii Dedication……………………………………………………..v Introduction…………………………………………………...1 History of the Hmong………………………………………....7 The Journey…………………………………………………...9 Fences…………………………………………………………19 Orange Buses………………………………………………….30 Conclusion…………………………………………………….33 Bibliography…………………………………………………..39 i Abstract Through the story of Cher Her, a Hmong man, this paper will discuss the lives and experiences of Hmong men during the evacuation of Long Cheng in 1975, the journey to the refugee camps, and leaving Thailand for resettlement in America. This narrative addresses how these men escaped persecution from communist forces, and led their families to refugee camps in Thailand. The flight presented many challenges: coping with new laws, their masculinity and pride taken away from them. It explores how the lives of Hmong men were affected by leaving Thailand, an place similar to their homeland, and entering a new world where social economics and culture shock has “flipped them upside down,” feeling like they now reside at the bottom of the family structure. ii Acknowledgement I would like to take this time to thank my mentor and friend Joseph Orser. He supported and helped me push forward in Hmong Studies. At times when I felt like giving up, his belief in me pushed me forward.
    [Show full text]