Bro. Drtjmmond's Defence. the New Philadelphia
himself fairly down to master that peculiar correspondence, BRO. DRTJMMOND'S DEFENCE. can have any doubt where the " shoe pinched." Bro. Drummond's excuse seems simply to be, firstly, cannot seo how Bro. Drummond mends the WE " I know I ouffht not to have gone and done it;" and. matter of the Yorston case, (disagreeable and secondly, "it was only a little one ;" and he therefore painful as it is,) by his letter to the Masonic Token, a copy winds up with an impermissible and stupid " tu quoque " of which we present elsewhere in our impression to-day. to Bro. Gould, who certainly, considering hia Masonic He is like the witness always dreaded by barristers,—he labours, had a right to expect fair and courteous treatment says " too much." from professed Masonic students, and high American His confidences , as revealed to our worthy Bro. Berry, Masonic officials. the able editor of the Masonio Token, are alike effusive an d The matter is a very melancholy one in itself, and in its characteristic. He shows us his hand so clearly, that as " output," for all the brethren of our Order everywhere, he is evidently leading from a single " trump," he enables and especially as before the world, often tempted aud ever Bro. Gould to bring in his strong and leading " suit " ready to scoff at Masonic professions, and to question with singular effect . Masonic reality. Even his own admissions tell against himself and his Had Bro. Yorston, using his legal rights, originally " particepes criminis." printed the work, no one would have said anything, least Prom his " confession ," it is clear now, as Bro.
[Show full text]