Bro. Drtjmmond's Defence. the New Philadelphia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
himself fairly down to master that peculiar correspondence, BRO. DRTJMMOND'S DEFENCE. can have any doubt where the " shoe pinched." Bro. Drummond's excuse seems simply to be, firstly, cannot seo how Bro. Drummond mends the WE " I know I ouffht not to have gone and done it;" and. matter of the Yorston case, (disagreeable and secondly, "it was only a little one ;" and he therefore painful as it is,) by his letter to the Masonic Token, a copy winds up with an impermissible and stupid " tu quoque " of which we present elsewhere in our impression to-day. to Bro. Gould, who certainly, considering hia Masonic He is like the witness always dreaded by barristers,—he labours, had a right to expect fair and courteous treatment says " too much." from professed Masonic students, and high American His confidences , as revealed to our worthy Bro. Berry, Masonic officials. the able editor of the Masonio Token, are alike effusive an d The matter is a very melancholy one in itself, and in its characteristic. He shows us his hand so clearly, that as " output," for all the brethren of our Order everywhere, he is evidently leading from a single " trump," he enables and especially as before the world, often tempted aud ever Bro. Gould to bring in his strong and leading " suit " ready to scoff at Masonic professions, and to question with singular effect . Masonic reality. Even his own admissions tell against himself and his Had Bro. Yorston, using his legal rights, originally " particepes criminis." printed the work, no one would have said anything, least Prom his " confession ," it is clear now, as Bro. Jack of all Bros. Jack and Gould , as the state of the law of suspected then , that a " ring " was formed , to publish copyright is very hard on the " brain carrier," and those Bro. Gould's History somehow or other, though we do not les and sacrifices are so easil ' whose labours, and strugg y proiess for one moment to understand how Bros. Carson, discounted, and so often forgotten. Yet, as it is useless to Drummond, Parvin , and Yorston could fancy then, or even " cry over spilt milk," so is it a waste of words and time to hold to it now, that what they were contemplating, was pour forth ceaseless " Jeremiades on a " fait accompli. characterised either by Masonic good form or equitable If , as a rule, " silence is golden," how much more is it treatment, as between " brother and brother." Bro. so where neither regret nor complaint can undo an injury, Yorston was " handicapped " in his start by a " leetle " or obliterate the evil, which mnst be left to the certain difficulty. " Nemesis " of time and justice ? He wanted to print the work undoubtedly, but he felt it But to cover this fortunate discovery of the " pea " necessary to stand fair with the American Craft. under the thimble," with the " high falutin of profuse "United " '" In the States we all know the Lodges often deal Masonic profession ; and to hoist the " Jolly Roger " in corporately with matters outside the purview of English tne guise ox a peaceiui ana nonesr. uraaer, is coo mucn ior Freemasonry. the consciences and digestions of " Gods and men," and is a They take what is familiarly termed the "high moral serious blot on the fair escutcheons of international and line " on many subjects, which we, in our worn-out old intellectual Freemasonry. country at home, think better to leave alone. We in fact do not " travel " beyond the Masonic " Record." Having respect to many recent American " deliverances," " de omnibus rebus et quibusdum aliis," it seems not easy THE NEW PHILADELPHIA THEORY. to say off-hand what matter of private transaction or BY BRO. JACOB NORTON. personal bearing our American Lodges might not deem it well to discuss and to adjudicate upon, on an alleged SINCE 1874 Bro. MacCalla has hammered away with all common law of Masonic morality and inter-individual rela- his might to prove that Coxe was " undoubtedly " tionship. Accordingly, though Bro. Yorston could not legally connected with the earliest introduction of Masonry into be prevented from reprinting Gould's Historv in America, Philadelphia ; and he actually succeeded in making as he thought best, there seemed to be a moral law of converts to his theory at home and abroad. * Recently, Masonic comity and brotherly good feeling, which some however, it was found that the Daniel Coxe theory is far Lodges in America might think he was violating, and might from being " undoubted ;" in fact, there is not the least treat with disapproval and condemnation. This stumbling foundation for it. But in order to soothe the former block in his way explains his apparent anxiety to come to believers in the Coxe theory, which includes all the Penn- some sort of a friendly understanding with Bro. Jack. sylvania Masons, Bro. Gould assured them that the Accordingly, he laid himself out to accomplish this feat St. John's Lodge of 1731 was a " Time Immemorial of Masonic international agreement, but he is never quite Lodge," and was, therefore, legal and legitimate without comfortable either in his verbiage or his protestations. " authority from home." Had Bro. Gould stopped there I He blew hot and cold, as we say ; and having to do with would not have troubled him further about it; but it seems a eanny Scotchman , as well as a worthy brother, who saw that his Philadelphia disappointed friends were not through his " little game " from the first, he had very little sufficientl y soothed with his " Time Immemorial " con- chance in the light and assurance of " running straight." cession. Hence, in the Keystone of 8th October, Brother And here it is that, as we view it, Bros. Carson and Gould, in a long letter, tried to prove that the 1731 Lodge Drummond seem to " pan out " so badly. at Philadelphia was not a 1731 Lodge at all, but it was a Bro. Yorston bases his action on Carson. Bro. Drum- 1728, or much older Lodge. This letter is spiced up here mond first relies on Bro. Carson, and then asserts his own and there with an "if so," a conjectu re ; and with the subjective view of tbe case and the correspondence. well-known method used in debating clubs, he proves to After that, as the Frenchman said, " tout est fini." his own satisfaction all he desires. He says :— But we confess that we do not see how any one, setting " It is evident that this [Philadelphia] Lodge was insti- tuted at the close of the year 1730, or the beginning Franklin " undoubted ly " was acquainted with the name of of the year 1731, with thirteen members. Now the said Lodge when he left Boston in 1723, and Franklin the point I wish to submit for your consideration is the " undoubtedly," in 1731, named the Philadelphia Lodge following one. Is it not as reasonable to conjecture that after the Boston Lodge. St. John's Lodge had existed before February 1731 ? Now, in the name of common sense T ask, whether there is . First of all, is there any evidence, aliunde , of the any evidence of the Philadelphia Quakers ever having had existence of Masonic Lodges in Philadelphia before 1731 ? any love for anything that was peculiarly English ? Their There is; in the Pennsylvania Gazette, No. 108, 8th Decem- towns and streets were named un-English, the map of ber 1730, printed by Benjamin Franklin, is the following Philadelphia is un-English ; they did not burn witches, or notice :— hang up Quakers, they had no Ancient and Honourable " As there are several Lodges of Freemasons in this Artillery Company, and, of course, they could not have Province, and people have lately been much amused with cared for English Masonry. conjectures concerning them, we think the following But here is something still more curious. My friend account of Freemasonry from London will not be unaccept- Bro. David Pulsifer, the Boston Antiquary, whose name able to the reader." I have mentioned in former communications, was employed " Here then [says Bro. Gould] the fact of there being by the State of Massachusetts, some years ago, to copy, in 1730, not one only, but several Lodges at work in the compile and edit some old documents, among which he Province, is satisfactorily established," Having satisfied found a letter dated 1654, page 137, containing the fol- himself that Franklin's statement was a bona fide fact, lowing order, viz. :— my good Brother then proceeded with speculating and " We desire that one psell of the goods now sent, guessing, that whereas Gibraltar had a Lodge in 1728, so marked and numbered as in the margin, may be deliuered may Pennsylvania have had Lodges even before 1728. In vnto Mr. John Eliot,"—21 March 1654 * short, it seems that Bro. Gould has forgotten the noble The mark alluded to is a Mason's Mark. Hence Bro. lessons he himself taught in his History of Freemasonry, Pulsifer copied it, and had it engraved. When Bro. John and has gone back to the old Masonic luminary style of T. Heard, a P.G.M. of Massachusetts, saw this mark he reasoning and proving. Bro. Gould ought to know that also took a copy thereof, for the purpose of proving by it with such a method of reasoning, a man may prove that the the antiquity of Masonry in Massachusetts. I have seen moon was made of green cheese. Now, with the same the mark, and there is no doubt that it is a Mason's mark. method of reasoning you shall see what I can prove.