MODIFYING TUBER SIZE DISTRIBUTION, LOW TEMPERATURE SWEETENING and TOLERANCE to HEAT STRESS in PROCESSING POTATOES ( Solanum Tube

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MODIFYING TUBER SIZE DISTRIBUTION, LOW TEMPERATURE SWEETENING and TOLERANCE to HEAT STRESS in PROCESSING POTATOES ( Solanum Tube MODIFYING TUBER SIZE DISTRIBUTION, LOW TEMPERATURE SWEETENING AND TOLERANCE TO HEAT STRESS IN PROCESSING POTATOES (Solanum tuberosum L.) By DEREK JAMES HERMAN A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Horticulture DECEMBER 2016 © Copyright by DEREK JAMES HERMAN, 2016 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by DEREK JAMES HERMAN, 2016 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of DEREK JAMES HERMAN find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. ___________________________________ N. Richard Knowles, Ph.D. ___________________________________ Mark Pavek, Ph.D. ___________________________________ John Fellman, Ph.D. ___________________________________ Nora Olsen, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to begin by thanking Dr. Rick Knowles for allowing me to further my education by attaining my Horticulture Doctorate of Philosophy degree in his prestigious laboratory. Your guidance, mentorship and generosity have allowed me to develop into the scientist, student and young man I am today. A special thanks to Dr. Lisa Knowles and Dr. Mohan Kumar, you are both world-class scientists and with your leadership and training I developed the skills necessary to thrive in the world of research. A special thank you to my undergraduate advisor and committee member Dr. John Fellman, your unique perspective and advice drove me to continue my education and for that I am so grateful. To the remainder of my committee, Dr. Mark Pavek and Dr. Nora Olsen, thank you for your advice on anything and everything potato. I would also like to thank all of those who helped with my research at Washington State University, but not limited to: Dr. Daniel Zommick, Zachary Holden, Chandler Dolezal, Dr. Rhett Spear, Dr. Jacob Blauer, Nora Fuller, Josh Rodriguez and Rudy Garza, without your assistance none of this would have been possible. Finally, thank you to my entire family, but most importantly my parents Drs. Doug and Wendy Herman. You instilled in me the hard work ethic and passion needed to be successful. I am forever grateful for the life you have given me, thank you and I love you. I appreciate you all so very much, without you I would not be where I am today. Thank you and Go Cougs! iii MODIFYING TUBER SIZE DISTRIBUTION, LOW TEMPERATURE SWEETENING AND TOLERANCE TO HEAT STRESS IN PROCESSING POTATOES (Solanum tuberosum L.) Abstract by Derek James Herman, Ph.D. Washington State University December 2016 Chair: N. Richard Knowles Controlling tuber size distribution and the propensity for low temperature sweetening (LTS) of processing potatoes are key to optimizing quality and maximizing crop value. My research focused on (1) developing methods to increase tuber set and shift tuber size distribution in cv. Bondi, (2) investigating how low O 2 storage modulates LTS of cvs. Innovator and Russet Burbank, (3) screening cultivars for tolerance to heat stress for retention of LTS-resistant phenotype and (4) determining the mechanism by which heat stress abolishes resistance to LTS. Bondi produces vigorous foliar growth, low tuber set and high yields of large tubers that frequently exceed optimum size for seed and processing markets. We evaluated several methods for altering apical dominance, tuber set and size distribution of Bondi and its maternal parent, Ranger Russet. Gibberellic acid (GA) applied to cut seed prior to planting reduced apical dominance, increased tuber set and decreased average tuber size; however, the optimal concentration to maximally shift tuber size distribution without decreasing marketable yield was iv 4-5-fold greater for Bondi than Ranger. The reduced sensitivity of Bondi to GA was likely inherited from its paternal parent Karaka, which displays similar morphological and developmental traits, indicative of high levels of endogenous GA. Russet Burbank and Innovator are frozen processing cultivars with inherently different susceptibilities to LTS. Here we show how low O 2 storage modulates cold-induced sweetening to reveal metabolic differences in LTS metabolism intrinsic to these cultivars. While storage of tubers in 2.5 kPa O 2 greatly attenuated the initial LTS responses for both cultivars, the effect was only temporary in Innovator. Low O 2 attenuated LTS by inhibiting invertase. Heat stress exacerbated cold-induced sweetening of Ranger and Russet Burbank tubers (LTS-susceptible cultivars), and abolished the inherent LTS-resistance of Sage Russet, GemStar Russet, POR06V12-3 and A02138-2 tubers. Heat stress rendered invertase cold-inducible in the LTS-resistant but non-heat tolerant cultivars/clones. Payette and its maternal parent EGA09702- 2, however, demonstrated considerable tolerance to heat stress for retention of LTS-resistance. Payette’s heat tolerance was conferred by the lack of cold-induction of invertase, similar to Innate ® Russet Burbank (W8) tubers, where silenced invertase activity conferred robust tolerance to heat stress. v Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………… iii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….. iv List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………….. x List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………. xi Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………………….. xiii Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………. 1 References………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Chapter 1 : DIFFERENTIAL SENSITIVITIES OF GENETICALLY RELATED POTATO CULTIVARS TO TREATMENTS DESIGNED TO ALTER APICAL DOMINANCE , TUBER SET AND SIZE DISTRIBUTION Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………. 8 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………... 10 Materials and Methods………………………………………………………………….. 13 Synopsis of Trials…………………………………………………………………… 13 Seed Preparation and Treatments…………………………………………………… 14 Field Plot Design and Maintenance………………………………………………… 15 Plant Establishment, Stem Counts, Harvesting and Sorting………………………... 15 Data Analysis and Presentation……………………………………………………... 16 Results…………………………………………………………………………………... 16 GA x BA Dose Response…………………………………………………………… 16 CV x GA Dose Response…………………………………………………………… 18 GA x Seed Age Response…………………………………………………………... 22 vi Discussion………………………………………………………………………………. 24 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………... 29 References………………………………………………………………………………. 30 Figures and Tables……………………………………………………………………… 36 Chapter 2: LOW OXYGEN STORAGE MODULATES INVERTASE ACTIVITY TO ATTENUATE COLD -INDUCED SWEETENING AND LOSS OF PROCESS QUALITY IN POTATO (Solanum tuberosum L.) Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….… 53 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………... 55 Materials and methods………………………………………………………………….. 57 Plant Materials, Storage Temperature, and Controlled Atmosphere Regimes……... 57 Whole Tuber Respiration…………………………………………………………… 58 Sprouting, Fry Process Quality, and Tissue Sample Preparation…………………... 58 Carbohydrate Analysis……………………………………………………………… 59 Invertase and Starch Phosphorylase Activities……………………………………... 60 Data Analysis and Presentation……………………………………………………... 61 Results…………………………………………………………………………………... 61 Tuber Respiration…………………………………………………………………… 61 Tuber Dormancy and Sprouting…………………………………………………….. 63 Process Quality (Fry Color, Reducing Sugars, Sucrose)…………………………… 63 Invertase and Starch Phosphorylase Activities……………………………………... 66 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………. 68 Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………... 74 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………... 74 vii References………………………………………………………………………………. 75 Figures and Tables……………………………………………………………………… 84 Chapter 3: HEAT STRESS AFFECTS CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM DURING COLD -INDUCED SWEETENING OF POTATO (S OLANUM TUBEROSUM L.) Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………. 95 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………... 96 Materials and methods………………………………………………………………….. 98 Plant Material……………………………………………………………………….. 98 In-season Heat Stress Studies………………………………………………………. 98 Postharvest Handling and Storage………………………………………………….. 101 Tissue Sampling and Process Quality Assessment…………………………………. 101 Sucrose and Reducing Sugar Analyses……………………………………………... 102 Dormancy Break……………………………………………………………………. 103 PHHS Studies………………………………………………………………………. 103 Enzyme Analysis…………………………………………………………………… 104 RNA Extraction and qPCR…………………………………………………………. 105 Data Analysis and Presentation…………………………………………………….. 106 Results…………………………………………………………………………………... 107 In-season Heat Stress Studies………………………………………………………. 107 Tuber Set, Size, Yield and Raw Quality……………………………………………. 108 At Harvest Process Quality and Reducing Sugar Accumulation During LTS……… 109 Dormancy Break and Sprout Growth………………………………………………. 111 PHHS Studies………………………………………………………………………. 112 viii Invertase and Starch Phosphorylase Activities……………………………………... 113 qPCR Analysis of Invertase and Invertase Inhibitors………………………………. 115 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………. 116 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………... 124 References………………………………………………………………………………. 125 Figures and Tables……………………………………………………………………… 136 Appendix………………………………………………………………………………... 154 ix List of Tables Chapter 1 1. Table 1. Seed Treatments and Experimental Design……………………………….. 36 2. Table 2. GA and BA affect Tuber Yield and Size Distribution…………………….. 37 3. Table 3. Yield Responses to GA Concentrations in 2013…………………………... 38 4. Table 4. Yield Responses to GA Concentrations in 2014………………………….. 39 5. Table 5. Effects of GA and Seed Age on Plant Emergence and Yield in 2014…….. 40 Chapter 2 6. Table 1. P-values for
Recommended publications
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0259700 A1 Elling Et Al
    US 2015025.9700A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0259700 A1 Elling et al. (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 17, 2015 (54) TRANSGENC PLANTS WITH RNA Publication Classification INTERFERENCE-MEDIATED RESISTANCE AGAINST ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES (51) Int. Cl. CI2N 5/82 (2006.01) (71) Applicant: WASHINGTON STATE CI2N IS/II3 (2006.01) UNIVERSITY, PULLMAN, WA (US) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC .......... CI2N 15/8285 (2013.01); C12N 15/I 13 (72) Inventors: Axel A. Elling, Pullman, WA (US); (2013.01); C12N 23 10/141 (2013.01); C12N Charles R. Brown, Pullman, WA (US) 2310/531 (2013.01) (21) Appl. No.: 14/626,070 (57) ABSTRACT Transgenic plants that are stably resistant to the nematode (22) Filed: Feb. 19, 2015 Meloidogyne Chitwoodi are provided, as are methods of mak ing such transgenic plants. The transgenic plants (such as Related U.S. Application Data potatoes) are genetically engineered to express interfering (60) Provisional application No. 61/948,761, filed on Mar. RNA that targets the Meloidogyn effector protein 6, 2014. Mc16D1OL. Patent Application Publication US 2015/025.9700 A1 OIGI9I?JÄI TOIGI9IDJÄI OIGI9I?IAI TOICI9IDJÄI OIC19I?IN TOICI9IDWI Patent Application Publication Sep. 17, 2015 Sheet 2 of 11 US 2015/025.9700 A1 e h; Figure 2A Figure 2B Figure 2C Figure 2D Figure 3 Patent Application Publication Sep. 17, 2015 Sheet 3 of 11 US 2015/025.9700 A1 COL E2 D1 D2 D4 COL E2 D1 D2 D4 Figure 4A Figure 4B 25000 ;20000 15000 s 10000 2 5000 DES E29 D54 D56 D57 DES E29 D54 D56 D57 Figure 5A Figure 5B 60 1800 50 3.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Ground up the First Fifty Years of Mccain Foods
    CHAPTER TITLE i From the Ground up the FirSt FiFty yearS oF mcCain FoodS daniel StoFFman In collaboratI on wI th t ony van l eersum ii FROM THE GROUND UP CHAPTER TITLE iii ContentS Produced on the occasion of its 50th anniversary Copyright © McCain Foods Limited 2007 Foreword by Wallace McCain / x by All rights reserved. No part of this book, including images, illustrations, photographs, mcCain FoodS limited logos, text, etc. may be reproduced, modified, copied or transmitted in any form or used BCE Place for commercial purposes without the prior written permission of McCain Foods Limited, Preface by Janice Wismer / xii 181 Bay Street, Suite 3600 or, in the case of reprographic copying, a license from Access Copyright, the Canadian Toronto, Ontario, Canada Copyright Licensing Agency, One Yonge Street, Suite 1900, Toronto, Ontario, M6B 3A9. M5J 2T3 Chapter One the beGinninG / 1 www.mccain.com 416-955-1700 LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Stoffman, Daniel Chapter Two CroSSinG the atlantiC / 39 From the ground up : the first fifty years of McCain Foods / Daniel Stoffman For copies of this book, please contact: in collaboration with Tony van Leersum. McCain Foods Limited, Chapter Three aCroSS the Channel / 69 Director, Communications, Includes index. at [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-9783720-0-2 Chapter Four down under / 103 or at the address above 1. McCain Foods Limited – History. 2. McCain, Wallace, 1930– . 3. McCain, H. Harrison, 1927–2004. I. Van Leersum, Tony, 1935– . II. McCain Foods Limited Chapter Five the home Front / 125 This book was printed on paper containing III.
    [Show full text]
  • International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants Geneva
    E TG/23/6 ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2004-03-31 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS GENEVA * POTATO (Solanum tuberosum L.) GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY Alternative Names: * Latin English French German Spanish Solanum tuberosum L., Potato Pomme de terre Kartoffel Papa, Patata S. tuberosum L. sensu lato ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS These guidelines should be read in conjunction with document TG/1/3, “G eneral Introduction to the Examination of Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability and the Development of Harmonized Descriptions of New Varieties of Plants” (hereinafter referred to as the “General Introduction”) and its associated “TGP” documents. * These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest infor mation.] TG/23/6 Potato, 2004 -03 -31 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUBJECT OF THESE TES T GUIDELINES ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 3 2. MATERIAL REQUIRED ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 3 3. METHOD OF EXAMINATIO N................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 3 3.1 Duration of Tests ................................ ................................ ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice Document for the Coexistence of Genetically Modified
    JRC SCIENCE FOR POLICY REPORT European Coexistence Bureau (ECoB) Best practice document for the coexistence of genetically modified potato with conventional and organic farming Ivelin Rizov, Gerhard Rühl, Maren Langhof, Jonas Kathage, Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo 2018 EUR 29047 EN This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Address: Edificio Expo. c/ Inca Garcilaso, 3. E-41092 Seville (Spain) Email: [email protected] Tel.: +34 954 48 8318 JRC Science Hub: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC109645 EUR 29047 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-77694-6 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/055172 Print ISBN 978-92-79-77695-3 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2760/336072 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 © European Union, 2018 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. How to cite this report: Ivelin Rizov, Gerhard Rühl, Maren Langhof, Jonas Kathage, and Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo, Best practice document for the coexistence of genetically modified potato with conventional and organic farming, EUR 29047 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, ISBN 978-92-79-77694-6, doi:10.2760/055172, JRC109645.
    [Show full text]
  • Potatoes in the Home Garden
    for the Gardener Growing Potatoes in the Home Garden f you could cultivate a vegetable crop that could be grown in almost every climate (except hot tropical zones) from sea level to 15,000 feet, could be eaten for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks, prepared in a myriad of ways, be easily kept Iwithout processing or refrigeration for up to 6-8 months, produced high yields (2-5 pounds per square foot) and was extremely nutritious (high in protein, vitamin C, niacin, B vitamins, iron and energy) but low in calories (sans butter and sour cream), you would wouldn’t you? If you did you would be in the minority of home gardeners. Most gardeners eschew the illustrious “spud” (Solanum tuberosum), thinking it doesn’t warrant space in the small garden and that home grown potatoes don’t taste much better than their store-bought counterparts. Not true! Wrong on both counts. Solanum tuberosum (the Andean potato) originated in the highlands of the Andes mountain ranges of South America (Peru, Columbia, Ecuador, Bolivia) at elevations up to 15,000 feet. Potatoes have been in cultivation for more than 2000 years and there are more than 2,000-3,000 Beveridge Melisa varieties extant today. It is an herbaceous perennial in its native habitat, but treated as a tender annual in the temperate zones and damaged by frost at 28-30°F. The plant’s only edible portions are the tubers produced underground, apically (at the tip) on stolons (horizontal underground stems; see drawing at right). While potatoes produce viable seed, the genetic makeup of sexually- produced plants is so diverse and variable (heterozygous) that production from this seed is negligible.
    [Show full text]
  • Potato - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Potato - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Log in / create account Article Talk Read View source View history Our updated Terms of Use will become effective on May 25, 2012. Find out more. Main page Potato Contents From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Featured content Current events "Irish potato" redirects here. For the confectionery, see Irish potato candy. Random article For other uses, see Potato (disambiguation). Donate to Wikipedia The potato is a starchy, tuberous crop from the perennial Solanum tuberosum Interaction of the Solanaceae family (also known as the nightshades). The word potato may Potato Help refer to the plant itself as well as the edible tuber. In the region of the Andes, About Wikipedia there are some other closely related cultivated potato species. Potatoes were Community portal first introduced outside the Andes region four centuries ago, and have become Recent changes an integral part of much of the world's cuisine. It is the world's fourth-largest Contact Wikipedia food crop, following rice, wheat and maize.[1] Long-term storage of potatoes Toolbox requires specialised care in cold warehouses.[2] Print/export Wild potato species occur throughout the Americas, from the United States to [3] Uruguay. The potato was originally believed to have been domesticated Potato cultivars appear in a huge variety of [4] Languages independently in multiple locations, but later genetic testing of the wide variety colors, shapes, and sizes Afrikaans of cultivars and wild species proved a single origin for potatoes in the area
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Organic Potato Farming on Human and Environmental Health and Benefits from New Plant Breeding Techniques
    sustainability Review Effect of Organic Potato Farming on Human and Environmental Health and Benefits from New Plant Breeding Techniques. Is It Only a Matter of Public Acceptance? Daniela Pacifico * and Roberta Paris Council for Agricultural Research and Economics Analysis (CREA), Centre for Research on Industrial Crops, Via di Corticella, 133, 40128 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: daniela.pacifi[email protected]; Tel.: +39-051-631-6811 Academic Editor: Gerhart U. Ryffel Received: 26 July 2016; Accepted: 13 October 2016; Published: 20 October 2016 Abstract: Organic farming practices are commonly thought to reduce the environmental impact of agriculture and to preserve the naturalness of the products. Herein, we report the effect of crop management practices on nutritional and toxicological value of potato tubers. Comparative studies are often controversial and the results are dependent on genotype and methodological approach. Targeted analysis and “omics” strategies are discussed, pointing at the nutritional aspects and the corresponding biological and molecular processes involved. Organic farming supporters still do not accept the use of genetic modification to produce new varieties suited for organic agriculture and crop improvement by genetic engineering still sparks hot debate among various scientific and social factions whose major concern is the possible existence of unintended effects both on human and world health. In this context, the advent of “new plant breeding techniques” has reignited the discussion on genetic engineering and on the compatibility of the new technologies with an eco-friendly agriculture. Could cisgenic and genome-edited potatoes be new good options for organic agriculture? We discuss how these approaches can be used to address food security challenges and to overcome specific problems based on the biological characteristics of potato tubers, producing new varieties that can improve farmers’ profit with a lower impact on public opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Potato Guide 2005
    2005 POTATO CROP Variety, Weed and Pest Control Guide Publication 1300A Prince Edward Island Potato Varieties Registered in Canada 2005 Abielle - 3 * Caesar * HiLite Russet * Pink Pearl AC Belmont CalWhite Innovator - 11 * Prospect - 6 * AC Blue Pride Caribe Irish Cobbler Ranger Russet Accent Carleton Island Sunshine * Red Gold AC Chaleur Carlingford * Jemseg Red La Soda AC Domino Cascade Kanona Red Pontiac AC Dubuc Century Russet Katahdin Redsen AC Glacier Chip * Cherokee Kennebec Rideau * AC LR Russet Burbank * Cherry Red - 12 * Keswick Rocket * AC Maple Gold * Chieftain Krantz Roselys - 2 AC Novachip Coastal Russet Lady Rosetta Russet Burbank AC Peregine Red * Concurrent Maine Chip Russet Norkotah AC Ptarmigan * Conestoga Maris Bard * Saginaw Gold AC Red Island Cupids McIntyre Sangre AC Saguenor Dakota Pearl * Mirton Pearl Santé * AC Stampede Russet * Desirée Mondial * Saxon * AC Sunbury Divina - 7 * Morona Sebago Adora * Dundrod * Morene * Selma Agata * Envol Morning Gold * Shepody Agria * Epicure Navan - 2 * Sierra * Alpha Eramosa Nipigon Snowden Alta Russet * Estima * Niska Sunrise Altitude - 10 * Fabula - 7 * NL 10-RBK * Superior Andover Fambo NL 10-SUP * Tobique Anson Fjord - 9 * NL 20-SHE * Tolaas Aquilon FL 1207 NL 30-RBK * True Blue * Argos - 5 FL 1291 Nooksack Ulla Asterix * FL 1533 Norchip Umatilla Russet* Atlantic FL 1625 * Norgold Russet Valor - 5 Banana FL 1833 * NorKing Russet Van Gogh Belleisle FL 1867 * Norland Viking Bijou Rouge - 8 FL 1879 * NorValley * VO 123-25 - 4 * Bintje FL 1930 - 5 NorWis Warba Blue Mac Frontier Russet Obelix * White Rose Bombance - 9 Fundy Onaway Winston - 5 Brigus Gigant Pacific Russet * Yukon Gold Brise du Nord - 1 Goldrush Penta * Butte Green Mountain Peribonka - 10 * 1 Interim Registration - expires March 6, 2004 7 Interim Registration - expires May 17, 2005 2 Interim Registration - expires April 26, 2004 8 Interim Registration - expires May 19, 2005 3 Interim Registration - expires August 23, 2004 9 Interim Registration - expires May 29, 2005 4 Interim Registration - expires Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.)
    United Kingdom National List / Plant Breeders’ Rights Technical Protocol for the Official Examination of Distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability (DUS) Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) February 2020 Contents Section A - General Information ..................................................................................................... 1 1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scope ................................................................................................................................ 1 3 Responsibilities ................................................................................................................. 1 4 Non Compliance with the Protocol .................................................................................... 3 5 Responsibility for GM Releases ........................................................................................ 3 6 Procedures for GM Varieties ............................................................................................. 3 7 Associated Documents ...................................................................................................... 4 Section B – Application Requirements ........................................................................................... 5 1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 5 2 Scope ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Michigan Potato Research Report
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE MICHIGAN POTATO INDUSTRY COMMISSION 2004 MICHIGAN POTATO RESEARCH REPORT Photo on Left Left to Right: Ben Kudwa, First Last, First Last, First Last, Senator Alan Cropsey, First Last, First Last Volume 36 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……………………………. 1 2004 POTATO BREEDING AND GENETICS RESEARCH REPORT David S. Douches, J. Coombs, K. Zarka, S. Copper, L. Frank, J. Driscoll and E. Estelle…………………………………………. 5 2004 POTATO VARIETY EVALUATIONS D. S. Douches, J. Coombs, L. Frank, J. Driscoll, J. Estelle, K. Zarka, R. Hammerschmidt, and W. Kirk…………………..….……...… 18 MANAGEMENT PROFILE FOR NEW POTATO VARIETIES AND LINES DECEMBER 2004 Sieg S. Snapp, Chris M. Long, Dave S. Douches, and Kitty O’Neil…...….. 50 2004 ON-FARM POTATO VARIETY TRIALS Chris Long, Dr. Dave Douches, Fred Springborn (Montcalm), Dave Glenn (Presque Isle) and Dr. Doo-Hong Min (Upper Peninsula)..…... 56 SEED TREATMENT, IN-FURROW AND SEED PLUS FOLIAR TREATMENTS FOR CONTROL OF POTATO STEM CANKER AND BLACK SCURF, 2004 W.W. Kirk and R.L. Schafer and D. Berry, P. Wharton and P. Tumbalam………………………………..……...…………..………..... 70 POTATO SEED PIECE AND VARIETAL RESPONSE TO VARIABLE RATES OF GIBBRELLIC ACID 2003-2004 Chris Long and Dr. Willie Kirk……………..……...…………..……….... 73 MANAGING RHIZOCTONIA DISEASES OF POTATO WITH OPTIMIZED FUNGICIDE APPLICATIONS AND VARIETAL SUSCEPTIBILITY; RESULTS FROM THE FIELD EXPERIMENTS. Devan R. Berry, William W. Kirk, Phillip S. Wharton, Robert L. Schafer, and Pavani G. Tumbalam………………….……….... 78 HOST PLANT RESISTANCE AND REDUCED RATES AND FREQUENCIES OF FUNGICIDE APPLICATION TO CONTROL POTATO BLIGHT (COOPERATIVE TRIAL QUAD STATE GROUP 2004) W.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Starch and Antioxidant Properties of Quebec-Bred Potato Genotypes
    Starch and Antioxidant Properties of Quebec-bred Potato Genotypes Christina Larder Department of Plant Science Macdonald Campus of McGill University Montréal, Québec, Canada December 2015 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science ©Christina Larder, 2015 I Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ VII Résumé ....................................................................................................................................... VIII Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ X Contribution of Authors ................................................................................................................ XI List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... XII List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. XV List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. XVI Chapter 1: General Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Area Ii Potato Research and Promotion Council and Northern
    MINNESOTA AREA II POTATO RESEARCH AND PROMOTION COUNCIL AND NORTHERN PLAINS POTATO GROWERS ASSOCIATION 2019 RESEARCH REPORTS Table of Contents 3. Impact of Sublethal Dicamba & Glyphosate Rates on Three Chipping Potato Cultivars M. Brooke, H. Hatterman-Valenti, A. Robinson, G. Secor & A. Auwarter 7. Vine Desiccation as an Effective Disease Management Strategy to Control Verticillium Wilt of Potato N. Gudmestad 13. Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Cold-induced Sweetening in Potato Tubers During Storage S. Gupta & C. Rosen 21. Pressure Flattening and Bruise Susceptibility Among New Fresh Market and Chip Varieties D. Haagenson 26. Adjuvent Comparison with Potato Desiccants, Grand Forks, 1 H. Hatterman-Valenti & C. Auwarter 27. Adjuvent Comparison with Potato Desiccants, Grand Forks, 2 H. Hatterman-Valenti and C. Auwarter 28. Evaluating SOP vs. MOP Programs in Russet Burbank Potato H. Hatterman-Valenti & C. Auwarter 29. Evaluating Single and Repeat Hail Event in “Clearwater” Potato H. Hatterman-Valenti & C. Auwarter 32. Baseline Evaluation of Pollinator Landscape Plantings Bordering Commercial Potato I. MacRae 36. Management of Colorado Potato Beetle in Minnesota & North Dakota I. MacRae 41. Managing PVY Vectors, 2018 I. MacRae 49. Carryover of Herbicides in Potato Production Systems A. Robinson, E. Brandvik, & P. Ihry 54. Effects of Planting Configuration & Plant Population Density on the N Response of Russet Burbank Tuber Yield & Size C. Rosen, J. Crants, M. McNearney, K. Olander& H. Barrett 66. Evaluation of Aspire, Micro-Essentials S10, & MicroEssentials SZ as Sources of Potassium, Phosphate, Sulfur, Boron & Zine for Russet Burbank Potatoes C. Rosen, J. Crants & M. McNearney 73. Evaluation of New Controlled Release Urea Fertilizer Products as N Sources for Russet Burbank Potatoes C.
    [Show full text]