Noah Desimone Sitting So Tragically Abandoned? in This Junior, Geography/Urban Studies & Essay, I Answer This Question in Several Parts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Noah Desimone Sitting So Tragically Abandoned? in This Junior, Geography/Urban Studies & Essay, I Answer This Question in Several Parts The Newtown Line: Analyzing a an unusual feeling of dissonance in the Geography of Abandonment in spatial landscape. Why is an otherwise unassuming commuter railroad line, running Suburban Philadelphia through what seem to be communities perfectly deserving of passenger rail service, Noah DeSimone sitting so tragically abandoned? In this Junior, Geography/Urban Studies & essay, I answer this question in several parts. Philosophy First, I discuss what the line was, touching upon its intended purpose and history. Then, Running for about 15 miles through I discuss how the line changed as new urban several municipalities in Bucks and demands of the surrounding area rendered it Montgomery counties is a commuter rail obsolete. Finally, I analyze the future of the line. The line begins in Fox Chase, a line in the context of a new postmodern neighborhood in Northeast Philadelphia, geography of the Philadelphia region, and where it winds through largely residential what it will never be again—a commuter rail low-density townships before it ends in the line. borough of Newtown. This rail line is The Newtown Line was originally known today as the Newtown Line. At one conceived as competition to the point, it served scores of railroad patrons Pennsylvania Railroad’s, or PRR, traveling to and from Philadelphia, as well Philadelphia-New York route. At the time, 1 as some minor freight customers. Today,​ ​ this was the only railroad connecting the two most of it has been converted into a trail to cities. Originally an ambitious project by a and what remains, largely in Northampton group of speculators to provide rail service and Newtown Townships, sits unused and to New York, the Philadelphia, Newtown, & overgrown with brush. The single-tracked New York Railroad reached Newtown by line runs right up against white picket fences 2 1878 but never made it further. For​ a time, ​ and suburban landscaping, crossing it was a pettifogging instrument of railroad neighborhood streets, finding its way into obstructionism. In the latter half of the 19th ​ otherwise sequestered dormitory century, a third company known as the subdivisions. Reading Railroad planned to complete a line Portions of the line abut largely between Jenkintown and Bound Brook, NJ intact stations with small parking lots, now to provide its own service between crumbling from disuse. A few of these Philadelphia and New York. To continue its stations have modern signage with remnants monopoly of Philadelphia-New York of transit maps still visible. The impression railroad service, the PRR acquired this same of this abandoned infrastructure, a rail line ex-rival Newtown route to block the which follows a route connecting Reading’s Jenkintown-Bound Brook route.3 ​ well-established suburban communities, is When that attempt failed, the PRR sold the puzzling. Its location and current state create railroad, and it was incorporated into the Reading system. The Reading Railroad well-invested commuter rail service along Jenkintown-Bound Brook route ended up the line’s route.6 ​ crossing the Newtown Line at an at-grade After the Second World War, junction, an arrangement which continued to Philadelphia and the surrounding region had the line’s abandonment and is still visible developed into a Fordist geographic today. This back-and-forth, in which the landscape. Substantial government railroad continuously switched hands investment to roadway corridors coincided between companies, assured that the with increased automobile use, and Newtown Line would settle late into the Philadelphians continued to settle in Reading Railroad’s system. Tracks to newly-minted suburbs. The Reading connect trains from the Newtown Line’s Railroad catered to commuter rail traffic via Philadelphia terminus in the north of the city its Philadelphia-bound rail lines, with the to Reading Terminal would not be train service running to inner-ring completed until 1892. Thus, it had the north-of-Philadelphia suburban distinction of being one of the last railroads municipalities such as Abington, Glenside, th 4 completed in the 19 cent​ ury. Jenkintown, and Elkins Park. These ​ ​ Subsequently, the Newtown Line dormitory communities were home to never ranked highly on the Reading workers who commuted to and from Railroad’s list of infrastructure priorities, Philadelphia via the Reading system. despite the fact that it was surrounded by Beyond these proto-suburbs, however, other similar suburban-urban routes. When Bucks and Montgomery County townships the Reading Railroad electrified—meaning, like Northampton remained rural and provided overhead catenary wires to deliver undeveloped. Here, the Reading Railroad power —most of their passenger railroad did not provide the same scope of service, lines in the 1930s, the company decided to and therefore further infrastructure skip the Newtown Line. For its entire investment was not as widely carried out. existence, it remained a largely The final two lines electrified by the single-tracked line with two sidings. As Reading Railroad—the largely rural routes commuters were whisked into Center City to West Trenton and Doylestown— were Philadelphia by steel-clad soot-free electric completed just before the Great Depression 7 multiple units on other Reading lines, hit in 1932. Predictably,​ no further ​ Newtown-bound trains continued to utilize investment by the Reading Railroad into its 5 steam power until the 1950s. This​ Newtown Line occurred thereafter. ​ arrangement reflected the largely rural scope By the 1960s, Philadelphia city and limited population which the line officials took note of increasing traffic in the served. There was very little industry in the Northeast sections of the city, areas whose area which required freight service, nor was planning had been largely guided by a Le there very much bedroom community Corbusiean “garden city” vision of urban development which necessitated design. The Northeast to this day very suburban in nature, dominated by railroad reorganization, trains to Newtown townhome-style dwellings, wide-median ran in one or two car sets and were lightly 9 boulevards meeting front yards, shopping patronized. This​ was likely due to the rural ​ centers with parking lots, and little and lightly populated nature of the rail-based transit. Understandably, traffic surrounding area, which did not encourage was exacerbated by commuting patterns in much ridership. What is most unfortunate is the Northeast, creating major jams. To the timing of the real property development accommodate faster service required of this which would later explode in the middle high demand, Philadelphia city government Bucks County area. From 1960 through decided to significantly upgrade service to 1970, the population of Northampton Fox Chase. This entailed the portion of the Township grew by 163%, and from 1970 to Newtown Line which ran within city limits, 1980 the township grew an additional 73%. namely from where the line diverges from Neighboring Newtown Township felt the the Reading Railroad mainline in Olney to shockwaves or suburban growth a little later: the Fox Chase station Northeast it grew 126% from 1980 to 1990, and from Philadelphia. At the cost of $2 million, 1990 to 2000 it grew an astounding 202%.10 ​ Philadelphia upgraded the railroad between Intuitively, these substantial changes Reading Terminal and Fox Chase to enable to the areas along the line seem to justify the 8 electric train service. Today,​ the Fox Chase need for passenger rail service. ​ Line shuttles thousands of Northeast Unfortunately, this growth came too little Philadelphia residents to and from Center too late for the Newtown Line. In the rise of City Philadelphia. Just north of Fox Chase, post-Fordism, commuting patterns and where tracks once led to Newtown, is now general patterns of settlement have changed the start of a trail. Once completed, more for Philadelphia and its hinterland. than half of what is left of the railroad will Population growth in Northampton and become trail. Newtown has slowed considerably since the The 1960s city-led service increase settlement boom of the 1960s and 1970s.11 ​ along the Philadelphia portion of the Suburbs rich in primarily single-family Newtown Line was not met with an equal residences like Northampton have seemed to increase in service north of Fox Chase. “max out” in growth; relatedly, major Northern suburban municipalities did not employers like Newtown’s Lockheed Martin generate the same amount of ridership that have left their home municipality in suburban Northeast Philadelphia could—as, response to corporate restructuring brought beyond the city limits, the line ran through about by new global economic demands.12 ​ rural townships in Montgomery and Bucks These changes, combined with the County. From the 1970s until the shuttering easily-accessible Delaware Expressway of service in 1983, when the line changed completed in the mid-1960s, have made hands from the Reading Railroad to SEPTA train travel to and from Philadelphia on a in the aftermath of 1970s federally-overseen commuter-rail-scale functionally unnecessary. Middle Bucks and the northern historic sites, and park and trail systems. Philadelphia suburbs are no longer home to Priorities for residents in these solely Philly-bound commuters—many municipalities are much different than the areas host those who work in other priorities of those in Northampton and Delaware Valley exurbs and nearby Newtown. Those with Bryn Athyn and Northeast megalopolitan centers, like Huntington Valley addresses, suburbs where 13 Trenton or New York. These​ changes have average incomes creep up into the six-figure ​ made a commuter rail line to Center City range, have no interest in getting public Philadelphia significantly less desirable, and transportation back into their communities.17 ​ therefore less plausible to pursue, in the 21st Since the likelihood of garnering public ​ century. support in these communities is zero, by Multiple attempts have been made to effect, the likelihood of getting trains to run revive train transportation to Northampton to Northampton or Newtown is also zero. and Newtown Townships, and all have With this in mind, it is more than a 14 failed.
Recommended publications
  • RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak
    RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak Amtrak Police Department (APD) Frequency Plan Freq Input Chan Use Tone 161.295 R (160.365) A Amtrak Police Dispatch 71.9 161.295 R (160.365) B Amtrak Police Dispatch 100.0 161.295 R (160.365) C Amtrak Police Dispatch 114.8 161.295 R (160.365) D Amtrak Police Dispatch 131.8 161.295 R (160.365) E Amtrak Police Dispatch 156.7 161.295 R (160.365) F Amtrak Police Dispatch 94.8 161.295 R (160.365) G Amtrak Police Dispatch 192.8 161.295 R (160.365) H Amtrak Police Dispatch 107.2 161.205 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Primary 146.2 160.815 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Secondary 146.2 160.830 R (160.215) Amtrak Police CID 123.0 173.375 Amtrak Police On-Train Use 203.5 Amtrak Police Area Repeater Locations Chan Location A Wilmington, DE B Morrisville, PA C Philadelphia, PA D Gap, PA E Paoli, PA H Race Amtrak Police 10-Codes 10-0 Emergency Broadcast 10-21 Call By Telephone 10-1 Receiving Poorly 10-22 Disregard 10-2 Receiving Well 10-24 Alarm 10-3 Priority Service 10-26 Prepare to Copy 10-4 Affirmative 10-33 Does Not Conform to Regulation 10-5 Repeat Message 10-36 Time Check 10-6 Busy 10-41 Begin Tour of Duty 10-7 Out Of Service 10-45 Accident 10-8 Back In Service 10-47 Train Protection 10-10 Vehicle/Person Check 10-48 Vandalism 10-11 Request Additional APD Units 10-49 Passenger/Patron Assist 10-12 Request Supervisor 10-50 Disorderly 10-13 Request Local Jurisdiction Police 10-77 Estimated Time of Arrival 10-14 Request Ambulance or Rescue Squad 10-82 Hostage 10-15 Request Fire Department 10-88 Bomb Threat 10-16
    [Show full text]
  • Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options
    Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Review of Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning Studies
    APPENDIX A: REVIEW OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PLANNING STUDIES This appendix provides an overview of previous planning efforts undertaken in and around Philadelphia that are relevant to the Plan. These include city initiatives, plans, studies, internal memos, and other relevant documents. This appendix briefly summarizes each previous plan or study, discusses its relevance to pedestrian and bicycle planning in Philadelphia, and lists specific recommendations when applicable. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE PLAN APRIL 2012 CONTENTS WALKING REPORTS AND STUDIES .......................................................................................................................... 1 Walking in Philadelphia ............................................................................................................................................ 1 South of South Walkabilty Plan................................................................................................................................. 1 North Broad Street Pedestrian Crash Study .............................................................................................................. 2 North Broad Street Pedestrian Safety Audit ............................................................................................................. 3 Pedestrian Safety and Mobility: Status and Initiatives ............................................................................................ 3 Neighborhood/Area Plans and Studies .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Torresdale-Cottman to Fern Rock Transportation Center
    A ®SEPT 28ective September 1, 2019 Eff Torresdale-Cottman to Fern Rock Transportation Center Serving Tacony and Fox Chase Customer Service 215-580-7800 TDD/TTY 215-580-7853 www.septa.org W est Av G St Basil Bustleton Whitman re 24 O O d e Huntingdon W nw v C C Square S. C. R Academy Krewstown o od Av wn Rd elsh Rd F Valley S. C. Y A k ox R I Plaza r C H Northeast o h H E wsto Grant A Y Rockledge P v a u M A s Cedar A L d Philadelphia n O l Jenkintown t e erree Rd Kre v s Rd t G E V O e rr i T AD Pennypack Airport Salus Manor Fo ng N IL To 77 d O H Park v Northeast University w Jenkinto Manor Hollywood on ns M P hip College Pk S. C. Lin e R velt Blvd Blue Grass Rd d v 232 Fox Chase A wn Rd 611 r Pine RdRha e wn Bustleton A Blue Grass d S Roose Ashton Rd C la 77 FOX CHASE t 67 v hurch Rd a S. C. w To STATION Willits Rd d wnship Line Rd 18 Ogontz a 1 C Jeanes Elkins Park Moss Rehab 24 Algon A Church RdHospital O v Plaza x H erree Rd Spring A Einstein at Elkins f v a o V Gloria Dei 19 s Fox Chase r C Park Chu b d High r Rd elsh v c r h h R o 67 Estates 14 Nazareth u Cancer Center o A r d W c k Soll hool Rd h v Castor A 58 d 19 Sc A Montgomer R Elkins Park 59 y A Hospital Ashton Rd v 1 H v t Central A v v ELKINS a A S r n kany kw Holme A so Too P RYERS Rha H r i y The Shoppes o PARK lm d k wn St e A C r e Av n e STATION at Rhawnhurst 59 STATION v 50 o 20 d c y Ashbourne Rd Burholme e R Northeast Rhawnhurst S Holme v CHELTENHAM Cottman A k A r Union w H.
    [Show full text]
  • Fox Chase Line Public Timetable Layout 13
    STATION LOCATIONS CONNECTING SERVICES* SATURDAYS FOX CHASE 215-722-3681 18, 24, 28 Rhawn & Jeanes Sts FareServices Train Number 805 807 811 815 819 823 827 831 835 839 843 847 851 855 859 863 Zone Ê*ËStations AM AM AM AM AM AMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPM RYERS REGIONAL RAIL REGIONAL FOX CHASE 70, 77 2 DDFox Chase 6:49 7:49 8:49 9:49 10:49 11:49 12:49 1:49 2:49 3:49 4:49 5:49 6:49 7:49 8:49 9:39 Cottman & Rockwell Aves 2 DDRyers 6:51 7:51 8:51 9:51 10:51 11:51 12:51 1:51 2:51 3:51 4:51 5:51 6:51 7:51 8:51 9:41 2 DDCheltenham 6:53 7:53 8:53 9:53 10:53 11:53 12:53 1:53 2:53 3:53 4:53 5:53 6:53 7:53 8:53 9:43 CHELTENHAM 215-745-1974 LINE 2 D Lawndale 6:55 7:55 8:55 9:55 10:55 11:55 12:55 1:55 2:55 3:55 4:55 5:55 6:55 7:55 8:55 9:45 Old Soldiers Rd & Hasbrook Ave 1 DDOlney 6:58 7:58 8:58 9:58 10:58 11:58 12:58 1:58 2:58 3:58 4:58 5:58 6:58 7:58 8:58 9:48 LAWNDALE C D Temple University 7:08 8:08 9:08 10:08 11:08 12:08 1:08 2:08 3:08 4:08 5:08 6:08 7:08 8:08 9:08 9:58 To/From Center City Philadelphia C DDMarket East Station 7:15 8:15 9:15 10:15 11:15 12:15 1:15 2:15 3:15 4:15 5:15 6:15 7:15 8:15 9:15 10:05 Robbins & Newtown Aves C DDSuburban Station 7:20 8:20 9:20 10:20 11:20 12:20 1:20 2:20 3:20 4:20 5:20 6:20 7:20 8:20 9:20 10:10 OLNEY 8 Effective February 10, 2013 TO CENTER CITY TO C DD30th Street Station 7:24 8:24 9:24 10:24 11:24 12:24 1:24 2:24 3:24 4:24 5:24 6:24 7:24 8:24 9:24 10:14 Tabor Rd & Mascher St TO CENTER CITY Train continues to CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW CHW (see Destination Codes ) AM AM AM AM AM PMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPM
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Passenger System Survey, Phase III Date Published June 2004 a Working Document Publication No
    JUNE 2004 intermodal passenger system survey phaseiii A WORKING DOCUMENT DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTA Suburban St & Transit Map Web 2021
    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB CC Stoneback Rd Old n d California Rd w d Rd Fretz Rd R o t n R d Dr Pipersville o Rd Smiths Corner i Rd Run Rd Steinsburg t n w TohickonRd Eagle ta Pk Rolling 309 a lo STOCKTON S l l Hill g R Rd Kellers o Tollgate Rd in h HAYCOCK Run Island Keiser p ic Rd H Cassel um c h Rd P Portzer i Tohickon Rd l k W West a r Hendrick Island Tavern R n Hills Run Point Pleasant Tohickon a Norristown Pottstown Doylestown L d P HellertownAv t 563 Slotter Bulls Island Brick o Valley D Elm Fornance St o i Allentown Brick TavernBethlehem c w Carversvill- w Rd Rd Mervine k Rd n Rd d Pottsgrove 55 Rd Rd St Pk i Myers Rd Sylvan Rd 32 Av n St Poplar St e 476 Delaware Rd 90 St St Erie Nockamixon Rd r g St. John's Av Cabin NJ 29 Rd Axe Deer Spruce Pond 9th Thatcher Pk QUAKERTOWN Handle R Rd H.S. Rd State Park s St. Aloysius Rd Rd l d Mill End l La Cemetery Swamp Rd 500 202 School Lumberville Pennsylvania e Bedminster 202 Kings Mill d Wismer River B V Orchard Rd Rd Creek u 1 Wood a W R S M c Cemetery 1 Broad l W Broad St Center Bedminster Park h Basin le Cassel Rockhill Rd Comfort e 1100 y Weiss E Upper Bucks Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Roosevelt Boulevard Section 1 – Appendix 1
    Roosevelt Boulevard Section 1 – Appendix 1 Previous Studies Review March 2016 This page intentionally left blank Task 1.C Review of Previous Studies Roosevelt Boulevard Route for Change Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................................... i City of Philadelphia Plans 1. Philadelphia 2035 Citywide Vision (2011, Philadelphia City Planning Commission) .............. 1 Study Purpose and Highlights ........................................................................................................ 1 Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 2 Public Involvement Process ...........................................................................................................11 Relevance to Route for Change Program ......................................................................................11 2. Lower Northeast District Plan (2012, Philadelphia City Planning Commission) ................... 15 Study Purpose and Highlights ...................................................................................................... 15 Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 16 Frankford Transportation Center ............................................................................................. 17 Frankford Gateway .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Upper Southampton Township Comprehensive Plan Update Final Plan
    2010 Upper Southampton Township Comprehensive Plan Update Final Plan Prepared for: The Township of Upper Southampton Bucks County, PA Prepared by: Upper Southampton Township Planning Commission Pennoni Associates, Inc. Economic Development Associates Date of Adoption: November 3, 2010 Administration Building, 939 Street Road, Southampton, PA 18966-4787, Ph. (215) 322-9700 www.southamptonpa.com 2010 Comprehensive Plan Update Upper Southampton Board of Supervisors Lola G. Biuckians, Chair Marguerite C. Genesio, Vice-chair Walter C. Stevens, Secretary/Treasurer Stephen Wallin, Asst. Secretary/Treasurer Keith E. Froggatt, Member Joseph W. Golden, Township Manager Upper Southampton Comprehensive Plan Committee (Planning Commission) Stanley Gawel, Chair Franz Kautz, Vice-chair Lisa Deubel, Secretary (former member) David Faust, member David George, member Ray Grossmuller, member Lou Ann Hingley, member Stephen Stadler, member Nancy Triscoli, Recording Secretary (Special thanks to the many public participants for their valuable comments and input) Professional Planning Assistance Provided by Pennoni Associates Inc. 3001 Market Street, Second Floor Drexel Plaza Philadelphia, PA 19104 P: 215-222-3000 – F: 215-222-0598 www.pennoni.com This document was prepared with financial assistance from the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development through a Land Use Planning and Technical Assistance Program (LUPTAP) Grant. 2010 Upper Southampton Comprehensive Plan Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapters Description Pages Chapter 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Septa-Phila-Transit-Street-Map.Pdf
    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q v A Mill Rd Cricket Kings Florence P Kentner v Jay St Linden Carpenter Ho Cir eb R v Newington Dr Danielle Winding W Eagle Rd Glen Echo Rd B Ruth St W Rosewood Hazel Oak Dr Orchard Dr w For additional information on streets and b v o o r Sandpiper Rd A Rose St oodbine1500 e l Rock Road A Surrey La n F Cypress e Dr r. A u Dr Dr 24 to Willard Dr D 400 1 120 ant A 3900 ood n 000 v L v A G Norristown Rd t Ivystream Rd Casey ie ae er Irving Pl 0 Beachwoo v A Pine St y La D Mill Rd A v Gwynedd p La a Office Complex A Rd Br W Valley Atkinson 311 v e d 276 Cir Rd W A v Wood y Mall Milford s r Cir Revere A transit services ouside the City of 311 La ay eas V View Dr y Robin Magnolia R Daman Dr aycross Rd v v Boston k a Bethlehem Pike Rock Rd A Meyer Jasper Heights La v 58 e lle H La e 5 Hatboro v Somers Dr v Lindberg Oak Rd A re Overb y i t A ld La Rd A t St ll Wheatfield Cir 5 Lantern Moore Rd La Forge ferson Dr St HoovStreet Rd CedarA v C d right Dr Whitney La n e La Round A Rd Trevose Heights ny Valley R ay v d rook Linden i Dr i 311 300 Dekalb Pk e T e 80 f Meadow La S Pl m D Philadelphia, please use SEPTA's t 150 a Dr d Fawn V W Dr 80- arminster Rd E A Linden sh ally-Ho Rd W eser La o Elm Aintree Rd ay Ne n La s Somers Rd Rd S Poplar RdS Center Rd Delft La Jef v 3800 v r Horseshoe Mettler Princeton Rd Quail A A under C A Poquessing W n Mann Rd r Militia Hill Rd v rrest v ve m D p W UPPER Grasshopper La Prudential Rd lo r D Newington Lafayette A W S Lake Rd 1400 3rd S eldon v e Crestview ly o TURNPIKE A Neshaminy s o u Rd A Suburban Street and Transit Map.
    [Show full text]
  • CC Visitors Map 2018 48X48
    Center City Philadelphia Street & SEPTA Transit Map Suburban Station Jefferson Station Museum of the American Revolution Penn Medicine Station © 2020 SEPTA 1 Penn’s Landing Center, Philadelphia History Museum 6 City Hall 9 Philadelphia Museum of Art 13 South Philadelphia Sports Delaware River Waterfront at the Atwater Kent Broad & Market Sts Benjamin Franklin Pkwy & Kelly Drive & Entertainment Complex Independence Seaport Museum, Grand Routes: MFL, 17, 21, 33, 38, 42, 48 City Hall Visitor’s Center, Masonic Temple, Fairmount Water Works, Broad St & Pattison Ave Plaza, Riverlink Ferry PA Academy of Fine Arts Boathouse Row, Azalea Garden Route: BSL, 4 Routes: MFL, 17, 21, 33, 42, 48 4 African American Museum Routes: MFL, BSL, 4, 7, 16, 33, 38, 48 Routes: 32, 38 in Philadelphia 14 South Street 2 Christ Church 7th & Arch Sts 7 Love Park / Suburban Station 10 Please Touch Museum Front St to 10th St 2nd & Market Sts Routes: MFL, 47, 48, 17, 33 16th & JFK Blvd 4231 Avenue of the Republic Fairmount Park Dining, Shopping, Entertainment Old City Restaurants/Shops Routes: MFL, BSL, 17, 32, 38, 48 Routes: 38 Routes: 47, 57 Routes: MFL, 17, 33, 48, 57 5 Convention Center Area 12th & Market Sts 8 Parkway Museums District 11 Philadelphia Zoo 15 Italian Market 3 Independence Mall Area PA Convention Center, Reading Terminal, Benjamin Franklin Pkwy at 18th St 34th & Girard Ave 9th St & Washington Ave 3rd & 6th, Walnut to Race Fashion District, Chinatown, Franklin Institute, Academy of Routes: BSL to Route 15 Trolley America’s oldest outdoor market Visitor’s
    [Show full text]
  • Septa Rail Transit & Frequent Bus Network
    SEPTA RAIL TRANSIT & TO TO IONAL R LANSDALE/DOYLESTOWN WARMINSTER G AI TO E L WEST TRENTON, NJ CEDARBROOK PLAZA R CONTINUES TO NESHAMINY MALL FREQUENT BUS NETWORK GLENSIDE WEST TRENTON LINE CHELTENHAM-OGONTZ FOX CHASE SOMERTON STATION OGONTZ AV FOX CHASE EASTON RD JENKINTOWN WYNCOTE NESHAMINY MALL BUSTLETON AV THOURON ST OXFORD AV INTERPLEX FERN ROCK CHESTNUT CHESTNUT HILL EAST TRAN. CENTER PENNYPACK UPSAL AV SOUTHAMPTON HILL CONTINUES TO STENTON AV 5TH-GODFREY PARK PLYMOUTH MEETING B COTTMAN AV RED LION R E IG O IN FOX CHASE LINE CONTINUES TO N H H S A L W PE D ET FRANKFORD-KNIGHTS TO E CHESTNUT HILL WEST STRE GRANT D RISING SUN AV IS US B R L CHEW AV OLNEY T.C. OLNEY AV I R N O E WELSH NORRISTOWN N CHESTNUT HILL EAST LINE GREGG RHAWN FRANKFO ET- RD K L R IN FRANKFORD AV A E LOGAN M COTTMAN FRANKFORD GERMANTOWN AV TRAN. CENTER NORRISTOWN CHESTNUT HILL WEST LINE WYOMING US TO 5TH B BRIDGEPORT TRAN. CENTER TRENTON, NJ KING OF PRUSSIA/ COTTMAN AV CONTINUES TO VALLEY FORGE ROOSEVELT BLVD FRANKFORD-GREGG WISSAHICKON WAYNE TORRESDALE- DEKALB VALLEY PARK JUNCTION HUNTING PARK ARROTT T.C. R COTTMAN EG IL MANAYUNK/NORRISTOWN LINE IONAL RA HUNTING PARK AV SCHUYLKIL CHURCH TORRESDALE AV L RIVER 23RD- ERIE HUGHES PARK VENGANGO CONTINUES TO ERIE AV ERIE-TORRESDALE BAKERS CENTRE TRENTON LINE GULPH MILLS CONTINUES HENRY-MIDVALE/ WISSAHICKON T.C. TIOGA ALLEGHENY AV ALLEGHENY R MATSONFORD E IL GERMANTOWN AV G A CONTINUES TO 27TH- IONAL R GLADWYNE 35TH-ALLEGHENY SOMERSET ALLEGHENY AV COUNTY LINE ALLEGHENY CYNWYD ALLEGHENY << 6TH 5TH >> NORTH HUNTINGDON NORTH TO RADNOR PAOLI/THORNDALE LINE PHILADELPHIA PAOLI/ PHILADELPHIA THORNDALE RICHMOND- CONTINUES TO 29TH 22ND LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER NORTH BROAD WESTMORELAND VILLANOVA YORK-DAUPHIN ROLLEY 63RD- SUSQUEHANNA- T MALVERN FAIRMOUNT DAUPHIN STADIUM PARK TEMPLE U.
    [Show full text]