This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. ‘DARK, DEPRESSING RIDDLE’: GERMANS, JEWS, AND THE MEANING OF THE VOLK IN THE THEOLOGY OF PAUL ALTHAUS RYAN TAFILOWSKI A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH, NEW COLLEGE IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY EDINBURGH, UK 2017 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It has been a joy to study at New College. On that account, I am first of all deeply indebted to my supervisors, Dr. Hannah Holtschneider and Dr. David Grumett. Dr. Holtschneider’s support for the project began over five years ago, when she graciously read (many, many) poorly-crafted drafts of my initial research proposal. Since that time, her vast insight and expertise, sharp editorial eye, and dependable oversight have made the thesis a much better product than it otherwise would have been. Thanks are due also to Dr. Grummet, whose careful proofing improved the quality of the work greatly. I would like to express my gratitude to the various institutions which made this project possible. I am grateful to the governing bodies of the Edinburgh Global Research Grant and the School of Divinity for funding this research. A term of study and research at the Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen was funded by an Erasmus grant, for which I am thankful. I owe a special debt to Professor Gotthard Jasper, who supported my research by providing access to the Althaus Nachlass in Erlangen. I wish to thank also the research support staff at the Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg for helping to coordinate the logistics of my research trip. Thanks are also due to Dr. Stephen Hamilton and Dr. Nadine Hamilton for their hospitality in Erlangen. I wish also to thank the senior scholars who took the time to answer naïve and/or tedious questions about Althaus, read drafts of my work at various stages of the project, or gave me the opportunity to present my research: Professor Nicholas Adams, Professor Matthew Becker, Professor Robert Ericksen, Professor Paul Hinlicky, Professor Jeff Mallinson, Dr. Christopher Probst, Dr. Joshua Ralston, Professor Paul Rorem, Professor Hans Schwarz, Professor Christoph Schwöbel, Professor Kevin Spicer, Professor Kirsi Stjerna, Professor Scott Wenig, and Dr. Joe Wright. I have been blessed beyond measure to meet so many wonderful people during my time at New College. I am grateful for the warm and collegial community in the School of Divinity, and I have made many close friends here: Dr. Kengo Akiyama, Dr. Andrew Blaski, Tom Breimeier, Josh Bruce, Cory Brock, Dr. Zach Cole, Cameron Clausing, Andrew Johnson, Dr. Will Kelly, and Steve Stiles all made my time in Edinburgh memorable. But special thanks are owed to two colleagues: Dr. David Robinson and Benj Petroelje. David didn’t realise that when he came to New College he’d really be doing two PhDs—his own, on Bonhoeffer’s reception of Hegel, and mine, about a little-known Lutheran named Paul Althaus. David read countless drafts and offered invaluable insight, for which he received far too little compensation. The same is true for Benj, who, after long hours of wrangling with Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians, ended up learning more about Althaus than anyone would ever want to know—every single weekend. Thanks for your friendship, Benj. I owe you a great many breakfast sandwiches. I offer my love and gratitude to my parents, Ed and Jeanie, whose deep piety and respect for learning inspired my love for theology at an early age. I want to thank you for challenging me to study in Britain. Usually, parents are disappointed when iii their children move far away from home—you would have been disappointed if I didn’t. I also owe a great deal to my sister, Allyson, whose free spirit and zest for life is a much-needed corrective to my subdued personality. My love and thanks also to my parents-in-law, Eric and Merri, and my brother-in-law, Justin, who trusted me enough to drag their daughter across an ocean on very uncertain venture. Thank you for giving of yourselves to support me in this work. I am indebted (on a number of levels) to Louise and Audrey, without whom none of this would have been even remotely possible. I am thankful also to the congregation at Foothills Fellowship Church, who never forgot us even while we were thousands of miles away. I could not have completed this project without the support of these three families. These last three years I have truly eaten my bread ‘by the sweat of my Frau.’ I have written these 100,000 words, but I still can’t seem to find the vocabulary to express my gratitude to my wife, Adrienne, who put her own dreams and aspirations on hold so that I could pursue mine. I will never forget your sacrifice, your grit, and your unconditional love and support. Thank you for always reminding me that there is (mercifully!) more to life than dead German theologians. In the end, each of these was a grace from the giver of every good gift: the relentlessly faithful God, the Father of Jesus Christ, who is the strength of my heart and my portion forever, even while my flesh and my heart may fail. Ryan Tafilowski Ph.D. Candidate Summer 2017 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE .............................................................................................................................................. i DECLARATION......................................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................................. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ...............................................................................................................................v ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................................. vii I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................1 i. Statement of the research question .......................................................................................4 ii. Biography and intellectual influences ..................................................................................7 iii. Between guilt and innocence: the legacy of Paul Althaus .................................................. 13 a. Suspicion .............................................................................................................. 15 b. Sympathy ............................................................................................................. 24 c. Ambivalence ........................................................................................................ 34 iv. Method, scope, and structure .............................................................................................. 37 a. A dialectical approach .......................................................................................... 37 b. A chronological approach .................................................................................... 40 MOVEMENT I: THE VOLK WHO BELONG EVERYWHERE AND NOWHERE: ALTHAUS’ SOCIETAL VISION FOR THE JEWS DURING THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC (1918–1933) II. INVISIBLE OTHERS: THE ‘JEWISH QUESTION’ IN THE ALTHAUSIAN IMAGINATION ...................... 47 i. Althaus in the context of the Weimar Republic ................................................................. 47 ii. The Jews as social and spiritual threat – ‘Kirche und Volkstum’ (1927) ........................... 53 iii. The Jews as the bearers of a ‘difficult fate’ – Leitsätze zur Ethik (1929) ........................... 64 iv. Conclusion: inclusion and exclusion ................................................................................. 77 III. ‘OPEN WOUNDS’: THE MYSTERIOUS PURPOSE OF JEWISH EXISTENCE ......................................... 79 i. The Jews as exploders of ‘ethnic national community’ – ‘Gott und Volk’ (1932) ............ 79 ii. The Jews as riddle of the coming Kingdom – Der Brief an die Römer (1932) .................. 87 iii. Conclusion: pathology and performance ............................................................................ 95 MOVEMENT II: AT THE CHURCH’S ‘GERMAN HOUR’: GERMANS, JEWS, AND ECCLESIAL SPACE UNDER NATIONAL SOCIALISM (1933–1945) IV. VOLK BEFORE CHURCH: THE ERLANGEN OPINION ON THE ARYAN PARAGRAPH AND THE ANSBACH MEMORANDUM .................................................................................................................................... 104 i. Althaus in the context of the Kirchenkampf .................................................................... 105 ii. The theological framework
Recommended publications
  • Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2018 Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany William Peter Fitz University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Fitz, William Peter, "Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany" (2018). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 275. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/275 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTIONARY POSTMODERNISM? NEOLIBERALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, THE INTERNET, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NEW FAR RIGHT IN GERMANY A Thesis Presented by William Peter Fitz to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In European Studies with Honors December 2018 Defense Date: December 4th, 2018 Thesis Committee: Alan E. Steinweis, Ph.D., Advisor Susanna Schrafstetter, Ph.D., Chairperson Adriana Borra, M.A. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Neoliberalism and Xenophobia 17 Chapter Two: Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity 52 Chapter Three: The Philosophy of the New Right 84 Chapter Four: The Internet and Meme Warfare 116 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 166 1 “Perhaps one will view the rise of the Alternative for Germany in the foreseeable future as inevitable, as a portent for major changes, one that is as necessary as it was predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Relationality and Our Identity in Christ: Helmut Thielicke's
    Human Relationality and Our Identity in Christ: Helmut Thielicke’s Theological Anthropology for the Sitz im Leben by Mark Hubert Lack A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Trinity College and the Theological Department of the Toronto School of Theology In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Theology awarded by Trinity College and the University of Toronto © Copyright by Mark Hubert Lack 2017 Human Relationality and Our Identity in Christ: Helmut Thielicke’s Theological Anthropology for the Sitz im Leben Mark Hubert Lack Master of Theology Trinity College and the University of Toronto 2017 Abstract For the German theologian Helmut Thielicke (1908-1986), theology must engage contemporary culture’s challenges. While the divine Word creates and maintains the reality of the human (and is essential to the profoundest understanding of the human), situation-specific challenges require specific applications of the Gospel. Thielicke’s theological anthropology exemplifies this approach: it confronts his culture’s existential concerns with a particular articulation of God’s “many-splendored” grace. To the postwar Germans anxious over identity and meaning, Thielicke proclaimed that humanity, created in God’s image and appointed to a divine relationship, is reconciled by Christ. Although immanent, penultimate relations defined and controlled the human person in popular understanding, Thielicke contended it is the person’s transcendent, definitive relation to God in Christ that constitutes true being. Thielicke’s theological approach and his Christological-relational anthropology remain pertinent today. ii Although Thielicke observed idiosyncratic expressions of existential concerns, those concerns are perennial. They are grounded in humanity’s universal sinful condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Billy Graham in West Germany: German Protestantism Between Americanization and Rechristianization, 1954–70
    Billy Graham in West Germany: German Protestantism between Americanization and Rechristianization, 1954–70 Uta Andrea Balbier Billy Graham in Düsseldorf, June 1954 (Bundesarchiv, Picture 194-0798-41, Photo: Hans Lachmann) In June 1954, American evangelist Billy Graham came to the Federal Republic of Germany for his first revival meetings. In Frankfurt, he preached at the American Christ Chapel, in Düsseldorf at the Rheinstadium, and two days later he closed his first German campaign with a service at the Olympic Stadium in Berlin. Thousands came to see him and hundreds stepped forward at the end of the service to publicly accept Christ as their Savior. Another campaign fol- lowed in 1955. The American preacher then returned to Germany again dur- ing the 1960s, and his work there peaked in 1970 with his EURO 70 campaign.1 Graham’s campaigns in Germany were not foreign spectacles, but rites of passage in German Protestantism. For many actors in the religious field, Gra- ham evoked and catalyzed fear of secularization and hopes for rechristianiza- Zeithistorische Forschungen/Studies in Contemporary History 7 (2010), S. 343-363 © Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen 2010 ISSN 1612–6033 344 Uta Andrea Balbier tion. Being an icon of religious modernization and a return to the traditional at the same time, he became a focal point of self-reflection for German Protes- tants in the 1950s and 1960s. Church leaders, theologians, and laymen used Graham’s campaigns to discuss secular and political challenges and deep social transformations in the religious and secular sphere. Therefore, leading Protes- tant bishops such as Otto Dibelius and Hanns Lilje supported Graham’s cam- paigns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften Des Historischen Kollegs
    The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften des Historischen Kollegs Herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching Kolloquien 91 The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Herausgegeben von Holger Afflerbach An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Schriften des Historischen Kollegs herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching in Verbindung mit Georg Brun, Peter Funke, Karl-Heinz Hoffmann, Martin Jehne, Susanne Lepsius, Helmut Neuhaus, Frank Rexroth, Martin Schulze Wessel, Willibald Steinmetz und Gerrit Walther Das Historische Kolleg fördert im Bereich der historisch orientierten Wissenschaften Gelehrte, die sich durch herausragende Leistungen in Forschung und Lehre ausgewiesen haben. Es vergibt zu diesem Zweck jährlich bis zu drei Forschungsstipendien und zwei Förderstipendien sowie alle drei Jahre den „Preis des Historischen Kollegs“. Die Forschungsstipendien, deren Verleihung zugleich eine Auszeichnung für die bisherigen Leis- tungen darstellt, sollen den berufenen Wissenschaftlern während eines Kollegjahres die Möglich- keit bieten, frei von anderen Verpflichtungen eine größere Arbeit abzuschließen. Professor Dr. Hol- ger Afflerbach (Leeds/UK) war – zusammen mit Professor Dr. Paul Nolte (Berlin), Dr. Martina Steber (London/UK) und Juniorprofessor Simon Wendt (Frankfurt am Main) – Stipendiat des Historischen Kollegs im Kollegjahr 2012/2013. Den Obliegenheiten der Stipendiaten gemäß hat Holger Afflerbach aus seinem Arbeitsbereich ein Kolloquium zum Thema „Der Sinn des Krieges. Politische Ziele und militärische Instrumente der kriegführenden Parteien von 1914–1918“ vom 21.
    [Show full text]
  • (Or a Close Approximation Thereof). Some Among
    '!10} !SX6!nc:?l l?l+ , MAR?.l'lN L[iTHii'M. , . B lil'i ?l l '.', The Theology of Marttn Luther. '11mm ll? l lllll'l m'l A Critical Assessment, By Hans- l m l 14 f 111 i ls' l!,I Martin Barth. Translated by Linda l 1 l' ill 1811 } 41i l I Thll I l:i l J 1 :!l IW l'.a .1 i'i l l Malony. Minneapolis: Fortress l :l l t 111 yaim m l :ll l -l W Press, 2012. W l mm mmmPl :!17 f Ql l ix 11 mmsl l l fl. m il mm r 11 # ti im l N l m l I !i l 11 m H s llffil l I m mil ffl mi l s ! n a Y m & .i N Jjkl nkl sii l m l 11 l i W i Ul 11!iill *!l l s ll l m & I'kll lk s m l m i l l mli m 411114 anli a ir im Renaissance over a century ago, nu- s ii fflilailjiM iMii W j&&l l a ?ir 1 vmimlJlm mmmi s mms l l a 111111 imi "The Theology of Martin Luther" (or a close approximation thereof). Some among these have aimed at a more systematic presentation (notably the contri- butions of Theodosius Harnack, Paul Althaus, and Oswald Bayer), while others have mixed chronological and systematic approaches (notably Julius K5stlin and Bernhard Lohse). Nev- erthe}ess, all such treatments have generally focused on what they considered to be valuable about their subject and have at- tempted to highlight the Reformer's positive contribution to theology, Hans-Martin Barth's presentation of Luther stands in both continuity and discontinuity with these studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans Rößler Nationalsozialismus in Der Fränkischen Provinz Neuendettelsau Unterm Hakenkreuz
    Hans Rößler Nationalsozialismus in der fränkischen Provinz Neuendettelsau unterm Hakenkreuz Hans Rößler Nationalsozialismus in der fränkischen Provinz Neuendettelsau unterm Hakenkreuz Bibliografische Informationen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbib- liografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet unter http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. 1. Auflage 2017 © Diakonie Neuendettelsau ISBN 978-3-9809431-9-2 Gestaltung: Andrea Töcker/Neuendettelsau Druck: VDS VERLAGSDRUCKEREI SCHMIDT 91413 Neustadt an der Aisch Umschlagsgestaltung: Reinhard Zimmermann/Mörsach Bildvorlage: Postkarte „Heilgrüße aus Neuendettelsau“ (Verlag SA. Trupp 4/19 Neuendettels- au/Mfr.), 1933 Inhalt Geleitwort von Rektor Dr. Mathias Hartmann .......................................................... 9 Vorwort: NS-Forschung in der fränkischen Provinz ................................................... 11 Einleitung: Der Ort Neuendettelsau in den 1930-er Jahren ....................................... 17 1. Teil: Christian Keyßers Hitler-Lied und seine Unterzeichner (1933) ............................... 21 1.1 Das Hitler-Lied von Christian Keyßer ......................................................................... 21 1.2 Dr. h. c. Christian Keyßer (1877–1961) – von der Missionspraxis der Stammesbekehrung zur völkischen Ideologie ............................................................ 24 1.3 Dr. Friedrich Eppelein (1887–1969) – durch die Volksmission zum Nationalsozialismus
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Program Book
    PRELIMINARY PROGRAM BOOK Friday - 8:00 AM-12:00 PM A20-100 Status of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, and Queer Persons in the Profession Committee Meeting Patrick S. Cheng, Chicago Theological Seminary, Presiding Friday - 8:00 AM-12:00 PM Friday - 8:00 AM-1:00 PM A20-101 Status of Women in the Profession Committee Meeting Su Yon Pak, Union Theological Seminary, Presiding Friday - 8:00 AM-1:00 PM Friday - 9:00 AM-12:00 PM A20-102 Public Understanding of Religion Committee Meeting Michael Kessler, Georgetown University, Presiding Friday - 9:00 AM-12:00 PM Friday - 9:00 AM-1:00 PM A20-103 Status of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the Profession Committee Meeting Nargis Virani, New York, NY, Presiding Friday - 9:00 AM-1:00 PM Friday - 9:00 AM-2:00 PM A20-104 International Connections Committee Meeting Amy L. Allocco, Elon University, Presiding Friday - 9:00 AM-2:00 PM Friday - 9:00 AM-5:00 PM A20-105 Regional Coordinators Meeting Susan E. Hill, University of Northern Iowa, Presiding Friday - 9:00 AM-5:00 PM A20-106 THATCamp - The Humanities and Technology Camp Eric Smith, Iliff School of Theology, Presiding John Crow, Florida State University, Presiding Michael Hemenway, Iliff School of Theology/University of Denver, Presiding Theme: THATCampAARSBL2015 Friday - 9:00 AM-5:00 PM Friday - 10:00 AM-1:00 PM A20-107 American Lectures in the History of Religions Committee Meeting Louis A. Ruprecht, Georgia State University, Presiding Friday - 10:00 AM-1:00 PM Friday - 11:00 AM-6:00 PM A20-108 Religion and Media Workshop Ann M.
    [Show full text]
  • By Submitting This Dissertation, I Declare That the Entirety of the Work
    RECOVERING THE CALVIN OF “TWO KINGDOMS”? A HISTORICAL-THEOLOGICAL INQUIRY IN THE LIGHT OF CHURCH-STATE DISCOURSE IN SOUTH AFRICA Simon Nicholas Jooste Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Theology at Stellenbosch University Promotor: Professor Robert R. Vosloo March 2013 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za By submitting this dissertation, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: February 20, 2013 Copyright © 2013 University of Stellenbosch All Rights Reserved i Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To begin, I must express my deepest gratitude for the supervision of Professor Robert R. Vosloo over the past three years. Despite his reservations from the outset about the central claims of this thesis, he has nevertheless provided wise and insightful guidance, and always with the most irenic spirit. Professor Vosloo is indicative of the warm reception I have received from the Faculty of Theology at Stellenbosch. I would like to express particular thanks to Professor Dirk J. Smit and Dr. Gerrit Brand for challenging me to think in ways I had not done before, and for being good traveling companions. I also acknowledge with gratitude the many opportunities presented at Stellenbosch to be exposed to world-class visiting scholars as well as Extraordinary Professors of the Stellenbosch Faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Theology
    CURRENT THEOLOGY CHANGES IN THE UNDERSTANDING OF LUTHER: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE YOUNG LUTHER Is Luther a Lutheran? Is there such a thing as a Lutheran theology or a Lutheran interpretation of Luther? The evaluation and re-evaluation of Martin Luther is an old yet current and urgent problem. It has always been urgent for Protestants to know the Reformers in order to know their tradition. Today it is especially important for both Protes­ tants and Roman Catholics to understand the Reformation. On the Protes­ tant side, contemporary theology has been influenced extensively by the Reformers. Thus one must be sure historically that the sixteenth century has not been distorted by contemporary interests, and systematically that the riches and relevance of Reformation theology have been fully realized. Traditionally, Roman Catholics have been interested in the Reformation more to attack it than to understand it. This is changing. Today Roman Catholics seek to understand the Reformation in order to achieve a theologi­ cal rapprochement with its heirs. Christian theologians of all traditions must understand the Reformation in order to understand theology. Theology as the many-splendored experience of the Church must appropriate the decisive product and critique of the Middle Ages. Actually, the task of understanding the Reformers is very complex. The search for the historical Luther has never yielded many permanent conclu­ sions. The interpretation of the "real'* Luther has changed from generation to generation. Today there is a re-evaluation of Luther going on—but historically this has always been the case, in varying degrees. One of the critical questions of modern Luther studies is the development of the young Luther.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Leaming 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI' PHILIP MELANCHTHON, THE FORMULA OF CONCORD, AND THE THIRD USE OF THE LAW DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ken Ray Schurb, B.A., B.S.Ed., M.Div., M.A., S.T.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Word-Of-God Conflict in the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod in the 20Th Century
    Luther Seminary Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary Master of Theology Theses Student Theses Spring 2018 The Word-of-God Conflict in the utherL an Church Missouri Synod in the 20th Century Donn Wilson Luther Seminary Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/mth_theses Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Donn, "The Word-of-God Conflict in the utherL an Church Missouri Synod in the 20th Century" (2018). Master of Theology Theses. 10. https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/mth_theses/10 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Theology Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE WORD-OF-GOD CONFLICT IN THE LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD IN THE 20TH CENTURY by DONN WILSON A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Luther Seminary In Partial Fulfillment, of The Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF THEOLOGY THESIS ADVISER: DR. MARY JANE HAEMIG ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr. Mary Jane Haemig has been very helpful in providing input on the writing of my thesis and posing critical questions. Several years ago, she guided my independent study of “Lutheran Orthodoxy 1580-1675,” which was my first introduction to this material. The two trips to Wittenberg over the January terms (2014 and 2016) and course on “Luther as Pastor” were very good introductions to Luther on-site.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Theology
    CURRENT THEOLOGY CURRENT ACCENTS IN LUTHER STUDY: 1960-67 In 1521, the year in which Luther made his stand at Worms in what the Whiggish English historian James Froude has described as "perhaps the finest scene in human history," Luther exclaimed: "We have become the spectacle of the world!" Four and a half centuries later Luther is once again in front and center as the Church reconsiders its past with an eye toward the future. "The historian," quipped the philosopher A. W. Schlegel, "is a prophet looking backward." In the eighteenth century J. G. Hamann, the magus of the North, could lament (1759) : "What a shame for our times that the spirit of this man [Luther] who founded our church lies thus under the ashes. What a power of eloquence, what a spirit for interpretation, what a prophet I How good the old wine will taste to you!" A hundred years later Theodosius Harnack declared the renewed study of Luther's theology to be one of the joyous developments in theological scholarship, although his own two-volume work (1862) remained almost a unique effort in the dismal nine­ teenth century. With the renaissance of Reformation studies in the twentieth century, Luther literature has reached mountainous proportions, so that one American scholar has estimated that more has been written about Luther than about any other person in history with the exception of Christ. The fifty years between the Reformation celebrations in 1917 and the year 1967 have not only witnessed an increase in volume but also the emerg­ ence of many new lines of inquiry in Luther study.
    [Show full text]