The Word-Of-God Conflict in the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod in the 20Th Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Word-Of-God Conflict in the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod in the 20Th Century Luther Seminary Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary Master of Theology Theses Student Theses Spring 2018 The Word-of-God Conflict in the utherL an Church Missouri Synod in the 20th Century Donn Wilson Luther Seminary Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/mth_theses Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Donn, "The Word-of-God Conflict in the utherL an Church Missouri Synod in the 20th Century" (2018). Master of Theology Theses. 10. https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/mth_theses/10 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Theology Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE WORD-OF-GOD CONFLICT IN THE LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD IN THE 20TH CENTURY by DONN WILSON A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Luther Seminary In Partial Fulfillment, of The Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF THEOLOGY THESIS ADVISER: DR. MARY JANE HAEMIG ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr. Mary Jane Haemig has been very helpful in providing input on the writing of my thesis and posing critical questions. Several years ago, she guided my independent study of “Lutheran Orthodoxy 1580-1675,” which was my first introduction to this material. The two trips to Wittenberg over the January terms (2014 and 2016) and course on “Luther as Pastor” were very good introductions to Luther on-site. Just prior to the Wittenberg trip in 2014, I studied “The Theology of Martin Luther” with Dr. Steven Paulson, which was further good background for Luther’s understanding of the Word. Dr. Mark Granquist guided my study of “The History of Lutherans in North America,” “The History of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod,” and studies in biblical historical criticism in the context of the modern church – all courses which were very relevant for this thesis. My course work at Luther Seminary has been very helpful. Dr. Edward Schroeder, a professor at Concordia Seminary St. Louis during the time of this conflict, provided his interpretation of events, directed me to material in the Crossings internet site, and clarified some points about the formal and material principles. Dr. Patrick Keifert and Dr. Gary Simpson from Luther Seminary provided information that enlightened me about their experience as students during this conflict. Dr. Matthew Becker sent me a one-page description of Confessionalism in the 1830s in Germany and its influence on C.F.W. Walther. ii Dr. Samuel Nafzger, former Executive Director of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR) in the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, shared his perspective about this conflict during an interview-discussion. Dr. Robert Hausman, professor at Concordia Teachers College, River Forest, Illinois, explained his experiences as a moderate there from 1968-74. Missouri Synod pastors Dr. Thomas Trapp, Rev. Deane Schuessler, and Rev. Robert Cordes shared background from their student days at Concordia Seminary in St. Louis in the 1950s and 60s. I appreciate the contributions of all the above individuals in helping me to understand this period in church history. In addition, Joel Thoreson, Archivist for Management and Reference Services at the Evangelical Lutheran Church Archives, provided oral histories from the Oral History Collection of the Archives of Cooperative Lutheranism. Finally, I received assistance from the Library staff at Luther Seminary. Peter Susag contributed writing and technical talents related to footnotes, bibliography, and general design. Peter Watters was helpful in answering questions about books, articles, and research papers. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................................................ vii 1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1 2. LUTHERAN ORTHODOXY AND THE ENLIGHTENED MIND ............................8 Lutheran Orthodoxy ..............................................................................................9 Important Theological Terms Derived from Lutheran Orthodoxy ..............12 Verbal Plenary Inspiration ....................................................................12 Inerrancy ...............................................................................................13 Scriptural Authority ..............................................................................14 The Enlightened Mind .........................................................................................15 3. C.F.W. WALTHER AND THE RETURN TO LUTHERAN ORTHODOXY ...........20 Two Expressions of Lutheran Theology: Orthodox and Erlangen .....................21 Justification by Grace through Faith ...................................................................26 4. FRANZ PIEPER, CHIEF DOGMATICIAN ...............................................................32 17th Century Lutheran Orthodoxy in 20th Century America................................33 Orthodoxy and Fundamentalism .........................................................................37 5. MODERATE MISSOURI 1932-1969, PART I ..........................................................40 A Statement-44 in 1945 .......................................................................................44 The Bad Boll Conference, 1948 ..........................................................................47 Werner Elert and the Erlangen Inroad .................................................................50 The Serious Clout of the “Little Norwegian Synod” ...........................................52 6. MODERATE MISSOURI 1932-1969, PART 2 ..........................................................58 iv The “Golden Era” of the Moderate Movement in Missouri, 1958-1969 ............63 Martin Scharlemann, Missouri’s Uncommon Person ..................................65 The Inerrancy of Scripture ....................................................................68 The Bible as Record, Witness and Medium ...........................................69 Revelation and Inspiration ....................................................................70 Concordia Theological Monthly ..................................................................72 Assessing Franz Pieper .................................................................................76 Valparaiso University and the Promising Tradition .....................................78 The Conservative Counter ...................................................................................81 Gospel Reductionism ...................................................................................81 Convention Resolutions ...............................................................................82 A Crisis .........................................................................................................84 7. TIETJEN, PREUS, AND THE NEW ORLEANS CONVENTION ...........................87 The Context for the Decisive Events of 1973-74 ................................................87 John Tietjen, an Easterner ...................................................................................91 Jack Preus ............................................................................................................95 A Statement of Scriptural and Confessional Principles ....................................100 The New Orleans Convention, July 6-13, 1973 ................................................102 To Repudiate the Historical Critical Method .............................................103 To Condemn Elements of the Teaching of the Faculty Majority ...............105 The Subversion of the Authority of Scripture, the Formal Principle ..105 Gospel Reductionism: Reducing the Authority of Scripture to its Gospel Content ....................................................................................106 Denial of the Third Use of the Law ....................................................107 8. CONCLUSION ..........................................................................................................109 BIBLIOGRAPY ...............................................................................................................115 v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AELC Association of Evangelical Lutheran Churches ALC American Lutheran Church CSSL Concordia Seminary, St. Louis CTCR Commission on Theology and Church Relations CTM Concordia Theological Monthly ELS Evangelical Lutheran Synod LCMS Lutheran Church Missouri Synod MS Missouri Synod vi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Tables Table 1. Important 20th Century LCMS Theological Statements .................................... 43 Table 2. Sample: Where CSSL Professors Received Their Advanced Degrees ............... 60 Table 3. Two Decades of Moderate CSSL Seminary Presidencies, 1953-74 ................... 64 Table 4. MS Doctrinal Resolutions Related to the Bible, 1959-73 .................................. 83 Table 5. Timeline of Key Events Surrounding the New Orleans Convention.................. 88 Table 6. Changes in CSSL Student Enrollment, 1973-75 .............................................. 111 Figures
Recommended publications
  • The Reform of Baptism and Confirmation in American Lutheranism
    LOGIA 1 Review Essay: The Reform of Baptism and Confirmation in American Lutheranism Armand J. Boehme The Reform of Baptism and Confirmation in American Lutheranism. By Jeffrey A. Truscott. Drew University Studies in Liturgy 11. Lanham, Maryland & Oxford: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2003. his book1 is a study of the production of the baptismal the church.” Thus the crafters of LBW greatly expanded T and confirmation rites contained in Lutheran Book of the “assembly’s participation in the baptismal act” (pp. Worship (LBW).2 The theology that underlies LBW 33, 205). These changes flow from a theology of action and its understanding of worship has significantly (liturgy as the work of the people), which emphasizes altered the Lutheran understanding of baptism and the fact that the church or the congregation is the confirmation. The theological foundation of LBW has mediating agent of God’s saving activity (p. 33).6 For influenced other Lutheran church bodies, contributing LBW the sacraments are understood significantly to profound changes in the Lutheran ecclesiologically—as actions of the congregation (pp. landscape. As Truscott wrote, those crafting the 205-206)—rather than soteriologically—as God acting baptismal liturgy in LBW would have to “overturn” old to give his people grace and forgiveness. This leads to an theologies of baptism, deal with “a theology that” emphasis on baby drama, water drama, and other believed in “the necessity of baptism for salvation,” and congregational acts (pp. 24–26, 220). This theology of “would have to convince Lutherans of the need for a new action is tied to an analytic view of justification, that is, liturgical and theological approach to baptism” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Part-Time Faculty List 2019-2020 THEA M
    Part-Time Faculty List 2019-2020 THEA M. ABRAHAM 2009 Director of Records Instructor of English B.A., Missouri Baptist University, 2003 M.S.E., Missouri Baptist University, 2007 M.A., University of Missouri-St. Louis, 2012 Graduate Certificate in Writing, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 2012 JUSTIN R. ARNETT 2018 Instructor of School of Nursing A.S., Mineral Area College, 2001 B.S.N., Central Methodist University, 2004 M.S.N., University of Missouri, 2007 JEANNE M. ARNOLD 2015 Instructor of School of Business B.S., Webster University, 1998 M.B.A., Webster University, 2006 DAVID AUBUCHON 2013 Instructor of School of Business A.A., Mineral Area College, 1999 B.S., Maryville University, 2001 M.B.A., Missouri Baptist University, 2011 NANCY M. BAKER 2018 Instructor of School of Education B.S., University of Missouri-St. Louis, 1981 M.Ed., National-Louis University, 1995 Ed.S., Missouri Baptist University, 2009 RUTH M. BANKS 2012 Instructor of School of Education B.A., Washington University, 1977 M.A., Washington University, 1981 M.A., University of Missouri-St. Louis, 1990 Ed.D., Saint Louis University, 1999 PAULA BERNHARDT 2019 Instructor of Fine Arts B.A.M., Lindenwood University, 2008 M.M., Webster University, 2010 MARILYN BERRY 2010 Instructor of School of Education B.S.E., Southwest Missouri State University, 1983 M.S., Southwest Baptist University, 2007 Additional Studies: Southwest Missouri State University, Lindenwood University RICK BIESIADECKI 2018 Instructor of Social and Behavioral Sciences B.S., Liberty University, 1992 M.Div.,
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving Concepts of God
    Best Integrated Writing Volume 4 Article 7 2017 Evolving Concepts of God Jordan E. McGee Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/biw Part of the International and Area Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation McGee, J. E. (2017). Evolving Concepts of God, Best Integrated Writing, 4. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Best Integrated Writing by an authorized editor of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact library- [email protected]. JORDAN E. McGEE REL 2040 Evolving Concepts of God JORDAN E. McGEE REL 2040: The Bible, Qur’an, and Western Culture, Fall 2016 Nominated by: Dr. Sharon Showman Jordan is majoring in Organizational Leadership at Wright State University’s Lake Campus. Jordan lives in Celina and manages the local restaurant, C- Town Wings. Most of her spare time is spent on music, arts, and reading. Jordan Notes: I am interested in learning about different religion as well as getting more in- depth with my own. This project opened my eyes to the similarities and differences of theology throughout history. I hope that people will take away new knowledge about the evolving concept of God and develop a desire to continue learning about religion. Dr. Showman Notes: Jordan’s paper reflects a personal and theological journey many serious students who take REL 2040 The Bible, Qur’an, and Western Culture embrace during the semester. Many of their long-held religious ideas or beliefs are brought into focus as they engage with the content of the course.
    [Show full text]
  • The Free Church Tradition and Worship* I ~Ssl!ME That It Is Corporate and Pu~Lic Wor~Hip That I.S Primarily III Nund
    The Free Church Tradition and Worship* I ~SSl!ME that it is corporate and pu~lic wor~hip that i.s primarily III nund. Our fathers used to call It "SOCIal worship" and r wonder whether any significance attaches to the fact Ijjhat we now caU it ." public worship." :At this point, as with our doctrinal in­ heritance, we are part of the fruit of the great RefoTInation mo~­ ment of the 16th century and the heirs not of one but of several of the great reformers of that century. Our heritage is a varied and complex one. It is this which accounts both for its strength and its weakness. First and foremost comes our debt to Luther. For 'IJhe mediaeval Church the Mass was the centre and climax of worship. It had become by the 16th century-in the words of W. D. Maxwell­ "a dramatic spectacle, culminating not in communion but in [lhe miracle of transubstantiation" (An Outline of Christian Worship, 1939 edition, p. 72). The service was said ~naudibly in a rtongue of which few even df the priests remained really masters. Many of the latter were illiterate and the sermon had long fallen into general disuse. The great contribution of the dynamic 'Luther was to restore the vernacular as the medium of worship. His German Bible and his German IMass sett the pattern for many other lands and races besides the German, among them our own. But Luther did more than Ithat. He revised the Roman service of Mass in the interests of gospel purity and then, perhaps less soundly in the long run, asa medium of instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church's One Foundation
    April 2011 Volume 38 Number 2 The Church’s One Foundation CURRENTS in Theology and Mission Currents in Theology and Mission Published by Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago in cooperation with Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary Wartburg Theological Seminary Editors: Kathleen D. Billman, Kurt K. Hendel, Mark N. Swanson Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Associate Editor: Craig L. Nessan Wartburg Theological Seminary (563-589-0207) [email protected] Assistant Editor: Ann Rezny [email protected] Copy Editor: Connie Sletto Editor of Preaching Helps: Craig A. Satterlee Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago [email protected] Editors of Book Reviews: Ralph W. Klein (Old Testament) Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago (773-256-0773) [email protected] Edgar M. Krentz (New Testament) Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago (773-256-0752) [email protected] Craig L. Nessan (history, theology, and ethics) Wartburg Theological Seminary (563-589-0207) [email protected] Circulation Office: 773-256-0751 [email protected] Editorial Board: Michael Aune (PLTS), James Erdman (WTS), Robert Kugler (PLTS), Jensen Seyenkulo (LSTC), Kristine Stache (WTS), Vítor Westhelle (LSTC). CURRENTS IN THEOLOGY AND MISSION (ISSN: 0098-2113) is published bimonthly (every other month), February, April, June, August, October, December. Annual subscription rate: $24.00 in the U.S.A., $28.00 elsewhere. Two-year rate: $44.00 in the U.S.A., $52.00 elsewhere. Three-year rate: $60.00 in the U.S.A., $72.00 elsewhere. Many back issues are available for $5.00, postage included. Published by Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, a nonprofit organization, 1100 East 55th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60615, to which all business correspondence is to be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • (PDF) a History of God: the 4000-Year
    (PDF) A History Of God: The 4,000- Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam Karen Armstrong - pdf free book A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam PDF, Download A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam PDF, A History Of God: The 4,000- Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam by Karen Armstrong Download, Read Online A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam E-Books, Read A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam Full Collection Karen Armstrong, Read Best Book Online A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam, A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam Free Read Online, PDF A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam Full Collection, full book A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam, pdf download A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam, Download Free A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam Book, Download PDF A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam Free Online, pdf free download A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam, the book A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam, Download A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam E-Books, Read A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam Books Online Free, A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam pdf read online, A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam Free Download, A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam Free PDF Online, A History Of God: The 4,000-Year Quest Of Judaism, Christianity And Islam Ebook Download, CLICK TO DOWNLOAD Quiet 's interview.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Ministerium Commemorative Program
    Mi nneapol i s and Sai nt Paul Area Synod MINISTERIUM Oct ober 29, 2020 Celebrating and Giving Thanks for the 50th Anniversary of the Church's Decision to Ordain Women into the Ministry of Word and Sacrament 1970-2020 P R O G R A M W e l c o m e Bishop Ann Svennungsen Minneapolis Area Synod G a t h e r i n g S o n g Mary Preus & Tom Witt Our Saviour's Lutheran Church, Minneapolis D e v o t i o n O God, Bishop Patricia Lull Saint Paul Area Synod you have called your servants to ventures of which we cannot see the V i d e o o f 3 5 t h A n n i v e r s a r y ending, by paths as yet untrodden, through perils unknown. P a n e l Give us faith to go out with good Rev. Babette Chatman, Augsburg University, Minneapolis Rev. Liz Eide, Lutheran Church of Peace, Maplewood courage, not knowing where we go, Rev. Marlene Helgemo, All Nations Indian Church, Minneapolis but only that your hand is leading Rev. Jen Nagel, University Lutheran Church of Hope, Minneapolis us and your love supporting us; Rev. Megan Torgerson, Easter Lutheran Church, Eagan through Jesus Christ our Lord. M u s i c Amen. Mary Preus & Tom Witt S m a l l G r o u p s M u s i c Mary Preus V i d e o o f 2 0 1 9 C h u r c h w i d e A s s e m b l y M u s i c Mary Preus B l e s s i n g Bishop Ann Svennungsen Page 2 Ordination of Women 1970- 2020 June 29, 1970 July 19, 1987 The LCA in convention voted to allow women’s Marlene Helgemo was the first American ordination.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Constitutional Bad Faith
    VOLUME 129 FEBRUARY 2016 NUMBER 4 © 2016 by The Harvard Law Review Association ARTICLE CONSTITUTIONAL BAD FAITH David E. Pozen CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 886 I. BAD FAITH BASICS ............................................................................................................... 890 II. JUDICIAL TOLERATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL BAD FAITH ..................................... 896 A. Doctrinal Responses ......................................................................................................... 897 1. Explicit Enforcement Zones ....................................................................................... 898 2. Implicit Enforcement Zones ....................................................................................... 902 3. Nonenforcement Zones ................................................................................................ 905 B. Explanations ...................................................................................................................... 909 III. VARIETIES OF CONSTITUTIONAL BAD FAITH ............................................................. 918 A. Subjective Bad Faith ....................................................................................................... 920 1. Dishonesty .................................................................................................................... 920 2. Disloyalty .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download the Battle for God : Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam Kindle
    THE BATTLE FOR GOD : FUNDAMENTALISM IN JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Karen Armstrong | 464 pages | 02 Apr 2001 | HarperCollins Publishers | 9780006383482 | English | London, United Kingdom The Battle for God : Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam PDF Book The Battle for God Karen Armstrong Ballantine Books , - Seiten 14 Rezensionen In the late twentieth century, fundamentalism has emerged as one of the most powerful forces at work in the world, contesting the dominance of modern secular values and threatening peace and harmony around the globe. The Battle For God. The username or password you entered is incorrect. By Peter Pomerantsev. In The Battle for God , Karen Armstrong brilliantly and sympathetically shows us how and why fundamentalist groups came into existence and what they yearn to accomplish. This is a book that will prove indispensable. CrossCurrents Forum. Dan heb jij recht op studentenkorting! The First Muslim. Britain's greatest religious historian chronicles the rise and rise of fundamentalism. Also by Karen Armstrong. Armstrong sensitively recognizes one of fundamentalism's great ironies: though they ostensibly seek to restore a displaced, mythical spiritual foundation, fundamentalists often re-establish that foundation using profoundly secular, pseudo-scientific means "creation science" is a prime example. In the late twentieth century, fundamentalism has emerged as one of the most powerful forces at work in the world, contesting the dominance of modern secular values and threatening peace and harmony around the globe. Jesus the King. Fundamentalists view the contemporary world with horror, rejecting its claims to truth, and a state of war now exists over the future of our culture.
    [Show full text]
  • American Lutheran Church of Sun City
    American Lutheran Church of Sun City MISSION STATEMENT: To proclaim the love of Jesus Christ, invite others to participate in our faith community, and be a blessing to all in word and deed. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ 2 Message from Rev. Lowell Nelson ..................................................................................... 3 President of the Congregational Council ............................................................................. 4 Worship and Music Department ...................................................................................... 5-6 Wellness Minute .................................................................................................................. 7 Trust Committee .................................................................................................................. 7 Women’s Ministries ............................................................................................................ 8 Benevolence Committee ...................................................................................................... 9 Stephen Ministry ............................................................................................................... 10 Wednesday Night Alive! ................................................................................................... 10 Neighborhood Groups ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liturgy Committee Meeting Minutes May 2, 2017
    Liturgy Committee Meeting Minutes May 2, 2017 LITURGY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES – May 2, 2017 Present: Dawn Wenzl, Msgr. Luna, Gerard Cordero, Jeanine Fried, Louise Davis, Christine Nathe, Patti Mitchel, Sr. Kathleen Hurley, Deacon George Miller, Elizabeth Slimak, Sister Kathleen Hurley, John Caldwell, Krista Rashap Excused Absences: Larry Connell, Teresa Madrid, Michael Jones, Zeke Ortiz Opening Prayer & Mission Statements: All recited the Liturgy Committee Opening prayer: May the Holy Spirit guide us as we endeavor to prayerfully and reverently serve the Lord, our God, as Liturgical Ministers at St. Joseph on the Rio Grande. May we lead by the example of our own personal spiritual lives, and by our actions each and every day. As we serve, may we always remember that we are all brothers and sisters in Christ; and that true worship comes from humble and contrite hearts, and love of one another. We ask this through Christ our Lord. Amen All recited the mission statements for the Parish and for the Liturgy Committee. Approval of the Agenda for May 2, 2017 Added “Scheduling” to Other Items. Approval of the agenda as amended was moved (Christine), seconded (John), and passed. Approval of Minutes from February 21, 2017 Add Krista Rashap to the attendance. Approval of the minutes as amended was moved (John), seconded (Louise), and passed. OLD BUSINESS Sound System – Someone went into sound cabinet in the Sacristy and turned off the wireless microphones. Liz removed the key from the sound cabinet and will label the key. It will be stored with the other keys. Teen Mass, March 12 – There was a lot of positive feedback about the teens handling their roles; however, no one greeted Msgr.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Three Point Five
    Religious Neutrality Chapter Three Draft: Feb. 14, 2011 Please do not cite or quote Chapter Three The American Specification of Neutrality Secularism in the United States has never been a secularism of governmental religion-blindness.1 Rather, it is secularism of a religion-friendly kind, which aims at broad, nondenominational support for religion while remaining neutral among religious factions. Neutrality’s fluidity means that it can vary in both its conceptual scope and its field of application. Religious neutrality, for example, could mean neutrality among varieties of Protestantism, or varieties of Christianity, or varieties of monotheism, or something even broader and vaguer. Whatever conceptual scope is attributed to it, the obligation of neutrality could be held to apply only to judges, or to both judges and legislators, or to citizens when voting. In this chapter, I will examine the specific variety of neutrality that has been followed in American law. It has never stopped treating religion as a distinctive human good. That neutrality, however, has shifted over time, becoming vaguer and more inclusive. Modes of secularism Which specification of neutrality we actually adopt will depend on our substantive reasons for adopting neutrality in the first place. Bruce Ackerman (who capitalizes “Neutrality” because it is the master concept of his political theory) observes that “it would be a category mistake to imagine that there could be a Neutral justification for the practice of Neutral justification – for Neutrality makes no sense except as a part of the practice it constitutes.”2 It is not possible to be blind to an issue with respect to which one has resolved to remain neutral.
    [Show full text]