DOCSLIB.ORG

463083 Vol2.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
463083 Vol2.Pdf Volume 2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE Variable print quality DAMAGED TEXT IN ORIGINAL TEXT CUT OFF IN ORIGINAL 266 Chapter 4 The Population of Middlesbrough 1) General Accounts a) Shortcomings in the mid-Nineteenth Century Sources Regarding the printed census material for Middlesbrough down to 1871, two aspects are important. From 1801 to 1831, Middlesbrough appears as part of the Liberty of West Langbaurgh in the North Riding: the information obtainable is limited, as is the general case, until after 1841, and the only complication is the separation of the township of Middlesbrough from the township of Linthorpe, both of which constitute the parish of Middlesbrough. Yet in all these early censuses the population of both townships was very small, and it is only in the year before the 1831 census was taken that the industrialisation of Middlesbrough began. From 1841 to 1871 Middlesbrough township was enumerated as part of Yarm sub-district, which was in the Registration District of Stockton, in the Registration County of Durham. As such, the town of Middlesbrough was not given the attention it may have received if it had remained part of the North Riding area. Some confusion arises because although most of the information on Middlesbrough appears with the Durham information, some crops up nevertheless under the North Riding auspices. Yet in spite of the fact that two areas present information on Middlesbrough, there are gaps in the presentations. This is especially annoying because in these years Middlesbrough experienced its 'mushroom' growth: population more than doubled between 1851 and 1861, and also between 1861 and 1871. These gaps can be illustrated by looking at specific questions. There is information for each census regarding the lumber of people in the town, their sex, and houses occupied and building. 267 Conversely information would not be expected on family size, household structure, and actual families and streets. Yet between these two sets of information there remains data on ages, birthplaces, and occupations. Normally one would expect to find this information for a growing industrial town, for as W. A. Armstrong has remarked ' one can easily obtain birthplace, occupational, and age-sex distributions for a given Victorian town 1 from the printed volumes'. Armstrong notes that the problem is to obtain relationships within these variables, and it is here of course that sampling from the enumerators' books comes in. Yet in respect of Middlesbrough even the variables are not easily obtainable. ' In 184.1 two of these three variables are obtainable. In the North Riding information in the Enumeration Abstracts, part I, there is included a break-down into parishes and townships oP 2 ages by sex, under and above 20 years. Also in the Age Abstracts, part I, there is North Riding information of the principal towns 3 in the county for ages by sex, for every quiennium: and the 4 chapelry of Middlesbrough is included as a principal town. Available also is information on birth places. On the same page of the Enumeration Abstracts as shows Ages above and below 20 years, there is a table showing how many of the total population were born in 'this county', and how many 'elsewhere'. For an indication of occupation, the information is less helpful. 1) W. A. Armstrong - The Interpretation of the Census Enumerators Books for Victorian Towns (in The Study of Urban History, 1968) 2) Emuneration Abstract, Part I, 184.3 (496) p 376. (497) 3) Age Abstract, Part I, 1843 pp 334 - 5. 4) The term ' ohapelry' used only in this census, is synonymous with the term 'township' as used in all the other censuses. 268 The preface of the Occupation Abstraft notes that 'there are separate returns ( distinguishing the sex, and whether above or under 20 years of age) for every county in Great Britain and for 1 the larger towns ' all ... Yet for neither the native county nor the registration is 'larger county Middlesbrough classed as .a town'. The North Riding limits itself to Richmond, Scarborough 2 and Whitby; whilst Durham limits itself to Bishops Wearmouth, 3 Darlington, Durham City and Gateshead. Thus, whilst in one volume of the 1841 census, Middlesbrough is included as a 'principal town' within the traditional county, it is not included in another volume as a 'larger town' in either the traditional or the registration county. The consequence is that the information regarding occupation is very much inferior to that of the 1831 census. In 1851 the situation deteriorated even further. Data on none of these three variables is available for the town. For the Ages of the population, the only available information is at district and sub-district levels, thus the nearest one can get to a break-down of the Middlesbrough data is as part of the sub-district of Yarm, where quinquennial groups are given for a total population 4 of 12,611.. For birth places the break-down of information is even more remote. Middlesbrough is included in the Stockton district figures, which show birth places with an analysis of under and over 20 years. A footnote merely records that 'part 1) Occupational Abstract, Part I, 1841 (587) p 7- 2) nnnnp 218. 3) nnnnp 34. 4) E1691 Population Tables II, vol II, 1854 - Ill p 744. 269 of the Stockton District containing 12,681 inhabitants, extends I into the North Riding of York' : nearly half this number were of course in the township of Middlesbrough. Occupations are listed 2 according to age and sex but only for the registration county. Thus for all three variables there is no information specifically for Middlesbrough. Sometimes details regarding age, birth place, and occupations are given for the 'principal' towns, but Middlesbrough is not so classed in the appropriate volume; however in the volume dealing with the Number of Inhabitants, Middlesbrough does appear in 3 the index as a 'principal' town which in this case refers to 'towns 4, 2000 inhabitants but the information in this of and upwards' , given volume refers only to population totals and houses, which information 5 is available in more detailed form elsewhere in the census publications. The published data for 1861 is equally unhelpful for the t own. Middlesbrough does not appear in the population tables volume under 6 a list of 'principal cities, boroughs, and towns', although by now the population of the township was 18,714.. In connection with this particular census, and the birth places of the inhabitants of 1) Population Tables II, II `1691 vol , 1854 - II] p 801. 2) " .. n it pp 756 - 61. [632 3) vol II, 1852 p 674. n nnp 102. 5) nn Div X, pp 12 - 13. 0322] 6) vol II, 186 3 Div X, p 937. 270 Middlesbrough, Ravenstein provides an interesting example of how he attempted to use Middlesbrough as one of his main examples, whilst lacking the sort of information I have mentioned. In making his comparison between the 1861 and 1871 birth place information he showed that between these two censuses, the I native' county element 1 dropped from 73.2% to 50.1% ; yet one must ask where his 2 information for 1861 came from. In a footnote he shows that he took 'the superintendent-registrar's district of Guisborough (22,128 inhabitants) as representing the Middlesbrough (18,992 inhabitants) of 1861', as 'no other details of the birthplaces for that year (were) obtainable'. He suggests in this way that the major part of the Guisborough area was made up of the population 3 Middlesbrough but that the aase: Guisborough of , was not was a registration district within the North Riding part of the Yorkshire registration county, whilst Middlesbrough was part of the Yarm sub-district within the Stockton registration district, as part of the Durham registration county. There was no demographic over- lap between the two areas. Ravenstein's method dictated that he take the information of the Yarm sub-district as the basis of his calculation: here the total population was 25,079, of whom 18,714 (75.6%) were in the township of Middlesbrough. Yet even here, 4 information was once more not obtainable. , With the publication of the data for 1871 the Piddle sbrough information became adequate, and comparable with places of a similar size. All three variables are available for the town although not without some slight inconsistency. Age, birthplace and occupation 1) See next section p 276. 2) (Journal E. G. Ravenstein - The Laws of Migration of the Statistical Society, vol 6,1885) p 215. 3) See Ravenstein's asterisked footnote in above article, p 216. 4) See appendices for an illustration of the limited use of the data available. 271 data for Middlesbrough are available within the Yorkshire Division, yet although the Durham Division data gives the Middlesbroush statistics for age and occupation, it omits birthplaces. The long- term pattern is thus that Middlesbrough data was comparatively adequate up to 1831 and from 1871, but in the gap between, the data was less adequate for 1841 and absent for 1851 and 1861, and even in 1871 the information is fuller in the Yorkshire pages than in those of Durham, although Middlesbrough was still part of the registration county of Durham. One gets the impression that the town is less well served, even in this statistical sense, because of its lack of status in the pre-census period, and because of its mid-way position between Durham and the North Riding, that caused it to become part of Durham for demographic purposes whilst remaining in most senses as part of the North Riding. This poverty of source material however has not inhibited a great amount of detailed comment on the town's population, as I shall demonstrate in my next section.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ORTHODONTIC COMMISSIONING INTENTIONS (Final - Sept 2018)
    CUMBRIA & NORTH EAST - ORTHODONTIC COMMISSIONING INTENTIONS (Final - Sept 2018) Contract size Contract Size Units of Indicative Name of Contract Lot Required premise(s) locaton for contract Orthodontic Activity patient (UOAs) numbers Durham Central Accessible location(s) within Central Durham (ie Neville's Cross/Elvet/Gilesgate) 14,100 627 Durham North West Accessible location(s) within North West Durham (ie Stanley/Tanfield/Consett North) 8,000 356 Bishop Auckland Accessible location(s) within Bishop Auckland 10,000 444 Darlington Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Darlington 9,000 400 Hartlepool Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Hartlepool 8,500 378 Middlesbrough Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Middlesbrough 10,700 476 Redcar and Cleveland Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Redcar & Cleveland, (ie wards of Dormanstown, West Dyke, Longbeck or 9,600 427 St Germains) Stockton-on-Tees Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Stockton on Tees) 16,300 724 Gateshead Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Gateshead 10,700 476 South Tyneside Accessible location(s) within the Borough of South Tyneside 7,900 351 Sunderland North Minimum of two sites - 1 x accesible location in Washington, and 1 other, ie Castle, Redhill or Southwick wards 9,000 400 Sunderland South Accessible location(s) South of River Wear (City Centre location, ie Millfield, Hendon, St Michael's wards) 16,000 711 Northumberland Central Accessible location(s) within Central Northumberland, ie Ashington. 9,000 400 Northumberland
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The development of education in the North Ridings of Yorkshire 1902 - 1939 Jennings, E. How to cite: Jennings, E. (1965) The development of education in the North Ridings of Yorkshire 1902 - 1939, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9965/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Abstract of M. Ed. thesis submitted by B. Jennings entitled "The Development of Education in the North Riding of Yorkshire 1902 - 1939" The aim of this work is to describe the growth of the educational system in a local authority area. The education acts, regulations of the Board and the educational theories of the period are detailed together with their effect on the national system. Local conditions of geograpliy and industry are also described in so far as they affected education in the North Riding of Yorkshire and resulted in the creation of an educational system characteristic of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Council of the Borough of Middlesbrough (Woodlands Road / Southfield Road / Fern Street) Temporary Traffic Regulation Order 2020
    THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MIDDLESBROUGH (WOODLANDS ROAD / SOUTHFIELD ROAD / FERN STREET) TEMPORARY TRAFFIC REGULATION ORDER 2020 NOTICE is hereby given that on 21st April 2020 Middlesbrough Council made an Order which prevents vehicles from using the lengths of road set out below due to redevelopment / improvement works by Teesside University taking place on or near the road because of the likelihood of danger to the public. Access for pedestrians and the emergency services will be maintained at all times. Access will also be provided for vehicles used in connection with maintenance and works carried out by statutory undertakers. The roads will be closed during the programmed dates shown below for up to 18 months or until the works have been completed and there is no longer a danger to the public. If the works are not completed within 18 months, the Order may be extended with the approval of the Secretary of State. Dated 23rd April 2020 Charlotte Benjamin Director of Legal and Governance Services Town Hall Middlesbrough TS1 9FX Location Description Programmed Dates Woodlands Road from its junctions with the southern kerbline of Clarendon 8/6/20 - 10/8/20 Road to the northern kerbline of Southfield Road. Southfield Road from a point 5m west of its junction with the western 20/7/20 - 10/8/20 kerbline of Woodlands Road to a point 15m east of its junction with the eastern kerbline of Woodlands Road. Southfield Road (northern parking bays only) from a point 6m west of its 27/4/20 - 10/8/20 junction with the western kerbline of Fern Street for a distance of 18m in a westerly direction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Council of the Borough of Middlesbrough (South Area) (Waiting and Loading and Parking Places) (Consolidation) Order 2006
    THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MIDDLESBROUGH (SOUTH AREA) (WAITING AND LOADING AND PARKING PLACES) (CONSOLIDATION) ORDER 2006 The Council of the Borough of Middlesbrough ('the Council') in exercise of its powers under Sections 1(1) and(2), 2(1) to (3) 3(2) 32(1) 35 45 46 46A 47 49 51 and 53 and Part IV of Schedule 9 to the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, ('the Act') and of all other enabling powers and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of Schedule 9 to the Act, hereby makes the following Order: DEFINITIONS In this Order all expressions except as otherwise herein provided shall have the meanings assigned to them by the Act. “disabled person's badge” has the same meaning as in the Disabled Persons (Badges for Motor Vehicles) (England) Regulations 2000 “disabled person's vehicle” means a vehicle lawfully displaying a disabled person's badge. “driver” in relation to a vehicle waiting in a parking place, means the person driving the vehicle at the time it was left in the parking place. “dual purpose vehicle” has the same meaning as in Regulation 3 of the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986, as amended. “freehold owner” means the owner of premises used for business purposes situated adjacent to a permit parking place more particularly set out in Schedule 10 to this Order. “goods vehicle” means a motor vehicle which is constructed or adapted for use for the carriage of goods or burden of any description and which has an unladen weight not exceeding 7.5 tonnes and is not drawing a trailer.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 28 April, 1931
    2744. THE LONDON GAZETTE, 28 APRIL, 1931. there by Norton Boad, Billingham Eoad, (2) In the Rural District of Stockton:— Belasis Lane ,and Avenue to the Transporter ••Yarm Boad, Tees Boad. Bridge (Port. Clarence). (4) As per Route (3) described jabove to (3) In the Rural District of Sto&esley:— Billingham Eoad, along that road thence by Yarm High Street, Leven Boad, Leven Bank, New Boad, Chilton Lane to Transporter Yarm Bank, Spital Lane, Thornaby Boad. Bridge" (Port Clarence). (4) In the Borough of Thornaby-on-Tees:— (5) Between Exchange Place, Middles- Victoria Bridge, Mandale Boad, Westbury brough, and Town Hall, Stockton-on-Tees, via Street, Boseberry Crescent, Cheltenham Newport Boad. Avenue, Mansfield Avenue, Cobden Street, (6) Between Exchange Place, Middles- Acklam Boad, Thornaby Boad, Middlesbrough brough, via Linthorpe Boad and Acklam Boad, Boad, Lanehouse Boad. - to Town Hall, Stockton-on-Tees. (5) In* the Rural District of Middlesbrough:— (7) Between North Ormesby, Middlesbrough, and Norton Green, Stockton-on-Tees, by New- Acklam Eoad, Newport Lane. port Eoad. (6) In the Borough of Middlesbrough:— (8) On certain roads in the Urban District Stockton Boad, Newport Boad, Corporation of Billingham in connection with the co- Boad, Albert Boad, Exchange Place, Newport ordination of services. Lane, Cambridge Boad, Orchard Boad, The Notice is also given that any Local Avenue, Linthorpe Boad, Borough Boad West, Authority, the Council of any County, or any North Ormesby Boad. persons who are already providing transport facilities on or in the neighbourhood of any (7) In the Rural District of Hartlepool:— part of any route to which the application Tees Boad.
    [Show full text]
  • 9777 Town and Country Planning Acts
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 6ra SEPTEMBER 1966 9777 The application relates to the roads specified in Within the Borough of Stockton-on-Tees the Schedule hereto, and .to routes made up of the Road A.67—from the Borough of Thornaby-on- said roads or parts thereof (together with roads on Tees to Stockton Town Hall. which the Corporation are permitted at present to Notice is also given that any Local Authority, the run Public Service Vehicles as part of their omnibus Council of any County, or any persons who are Undertaking). already providing transport facilities on or in the neighbourhood of any part of the route to which the THE SCHEDULE application relates, may lodge objections in writing The Urban District of Eston with the Traffic Commissioners at their offices, Low 1. A. 174 from The Square, Eston, along Eston Friar House, 36-42 Low Friar Street, Newcastle- High Street, Normanby High Street and Ormesby upon-Tyne 1, not later than the 26th day of Road to the eastern boundary of the rural district September 1966. of Stokesley (Spencer Beck Bridge). Dated this 30th day of August 1966. The Rural District of Stokesley 1. A. 174 from the eastern boundary of the rural /. L. Flynn, Clerk to the Board. district of Stokesley (Spencer Beck Bridge) along Middlesbrough Road, Normanby Road to the eastern boundary of the South Bank, Middlesbrough. County Borough of Middlesbrough. (210) 2. A. 1044 from the western boundary of the County Borough of Middlesbrough to its junction with the A.1045. The County Borough of Middlesbrough TOWN AND COUNTRY 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Sources for Further Reading May 2011 National Trust Bibliography
    Bibliography Sources for further reading May 2011 National Trust Bibliography Introduction Over many years a great deal has been published about the properties and collections in the care of the National Trust, yet to date no single record of those publications has been established. The following Bibliography is a first attempt to do just that, and provides a starting point for those who want to learn more about the properties and collections in the National Trust’s care. Inevitably this list will have gaps in it. Do please let us know of additional material that you feel might be included, or where you have spotted errors in the existing entries. All feedback to [email protected] would be very welcome. Please note the Bibliography does not include minor references within large reference works, such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica, or to guidebooks published by the National Trust. How to use The Bibliography is arranged by property, and then alphabetically by author. For ease of use, clicking on a hyperlink will take you from a property name listed on the Contents Page to the page for that property. ‘Return to Contents’ hyperlinks will take you back to the contents page. To search by particular terms, such as author or a theme, please make use of the ‘Find’ function, in the ‘Edit’ menu (or use the keyboard shortcut ‘[Ctrl] + [F]’). Locating copies of books, journals or specific articles Most of the books, and some journals and magazines, can of course be found in any good library. For access to rarer titles a visit to one of the country’s copyright libraries may be necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations 2011
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2011 No. 2679 IMMIGRATION The Immigration (Procedure for Formation of Civil Partnerships) Regulations 2011 Made - - - - 7th November 2011 Laid before Parliament 10th November 2011 Coming into force - - 1st December 2011 The Secretary of State makes the following Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by paragraphs, 4, 9, 13 and 16(3)(a) of Schedule 23 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004(a). In accordance with paragraphs 4(4), 9(2) and 13(2) of Schedule 23 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 she has consulted with the Registrar General. Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Immigration (Procedure for Formation of Civil Partnerships) Regulations 2011 and shall come into force on 1 December 2011. (2) In these Regulations— (a) “the 2004 Act” means the Civil Partnership Act 2004; and (b) “civil partnership” means a civil partnership which exists under or by virtue of the 2004 Act. Specified registration authorities in England and Wales 2.—(1) The registration authorities in England and Wales listed in the left-hand column of the Schedule to these Regulations are specified for the purposes of paragraph 4(1)(a) of Schedule 23 to the 2004 Act. (2) An employee or officer or other person provided by a specified registration authority is a “relevant individual” for the purposes of paragraph 4(1)(b) and (2) of Schedule 23 to the 2004 Act if he or she— (a) is authorised by that authority to attest notices of proposed civil partnership; and (b) is located at the office specified in relation to that authority in the right-hand column of the Schedule to these Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • North East Region
    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the North East region June 2021 Contents Summary 2 Who we are and what we do 2 The 2023 Review 2 Initial proposals 2 What is changing in the North East region? 2 How to have your say 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 4 2 Background to the 2023 Review 5 The rules in the legislation 6 Timetable for our review 7 Stage one – development of initial proposals 7 Stage two – consultation on initial proposals 8 Stage three – consultation on representations received 8 Stage four – development and publication of revised proposals 9 Stage five – development and publication of the final report and recommendations 9 3 Initial proposals for the North East region 10 Initial proposals for the Newcastle upon Tyne, North Tyneside and Northumberland sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the County Durham, South Tyneside and Sunderland sub-region 13 Initial proposals for the Gateshead sub-region 15 Initial proposals for the Tees Valley sub-region 16 4 How to have your say 18 How can you give us your views? 19 What do we want views on? 20 Appendix: Initial proposals for constituencies, including wards and electorates 21 Glossary 32 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the North East region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do The Boundary Commission for England (BCE) is an independent and impartial non-departmental public body, which is responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The 2023 Review We have the task of periodically reviewing the boundaries of all the Parliamentary constituencies in England.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 24 August, 1945 4293
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 24 AUGUST, 1945 4293 BOROUGH OF MANCHESTER (cont.)— COUNTY OF 'NORTHUMBERLAND— Platting Division: Captain Hugh James Berwick-upon-Tweed Division: Lieutenant- DELARGY. Colonel Robert Allen Fenwick THORPE, Rusholme Division: Hugh Lester O.B.E. HUTCHINSON, Esq. Hexham Division: Colonel The Right Honour- Withington Division: Squadron Leader able Douglas CLIFTON-BROWN. Edward Lascelles FLEMING, K.C. Wansbeck Division: Alfred ROBENS, Esq. COUNTY OF MERIONETH— BOROUGH OF NORWICH— Squadron Leader Emrys Owain ROBERTS. Lucy Baroness NOEL-(BUXTON, and John BOROUGH OF MERTHYR TYDFIL— PATON, Esq. Aberdare Division: George Henry HALL, Esq. COUNTY OF NOTTINGHAM—• Merthyr Division: Stephen Owen DAVIES, Bassetlaw Division: Frederick John Esq. BELLENGER, Esq. Broxtowe Division: Frederick Seymour BOROUGH OF MIDDLESBROUGH— COCKS, Esq. East Division: Alfred EDWARDS, Esq. Mansfield Division: Harry Bernard TAYLOR, West Division: Wing Commander Geoffrey Esq. COOPER. Newark Division: Sidney SHEPARD, Esq. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX— Rushcliffe Division: Florence Beatrice PATON. Acton Division: Joseph Alfred SPARKS, Esq. BOROUGH OF NOTTINGHAM— Brentford and Chiswfok Division: Captain Central Division: Geoffrey Stanley DE Francis Edward NOEL-BAKER. FREITAS, Esq. En-field Division: Ernest Albert John DAVIES East Division: James HARRISON, Esq. Esq. South Division: Henry Norma.n SMITH, Esq. Finchley Division: John Frederick West Division: Thomas O'BRIEN, Esq. Elleniborough CROWDER, Esq. Spelthome Division: George Albert BOROUGH OF OLDHAM— PARGITER, Esq. Frank FAIRHURST, Esq., and Charles Leslie Uxbridge Division: Flight Lieutenant Frank HALE, Esq. BBS WICK. COUNTY OF OXFORD— Wood Green Division: Arthur Beverley Banbury Division: Colonel Arthur Douglas BAXTER, Esq. DODDS-PARKER . Henley Division: Sir Gifford Wheaton Grey BOROUGH OF MITCHAM— Fox, Bart. Thomas BRADDOCK, Esq. BOROUGH OF OXFORD—• COUNTY OF MONMOUTH— Quintin McGarel HOGG.
    [Show full text]
  • The Council of the Borough of Middlesbrough (Central
    This document was classified as: OFFICIAL THE BOROUGH OF STOCKTON-ON-TEES ENVIRONMENTAL 7.5 TONNE WEIGHT RESTRICTION (AMENDMENT) ORDER 2021 The Council of the Borough of Stockton-on-Tees (“the Council”) in exercise of its powers under Sections 1, 2, 4 and Part IV of Schedule 9 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, (“the Act”) and of all other enabling powers and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of Schedule 9 to the Act, hereby makes the following Order: 1. This Order shall come into operation on the 1st day of November 2021 and may be cited as The Borough of Stockton-on-Tees, Environmental 7.5 Tonne Weight Restriction (Amendment) Order 2021. 2. The Borough of Stockton-on-Tees Environmental 7.5 Tonne Weight Restriction Order 2020 (“the 2020 Order”) shall be amended as follows but shall otherwise remain in full force and effect. (1) The words specified in the Schedule hereto are to be inserted into the Schedule of the 2020 Order. Given under the Common seal of the Council of the Borough of Stockton-on-Tees on 25th day of June 2021. THE SCHEDULE Wording to be added to the Schedule of the 2020 Order Road Length Central Avenue, Billingham Between its junctions with Station Road roundabout and Cowpen Lane roundabout. Lunedale Road, Billingham Full length. Kildale Road, Billingham Full length. Teesdale Avenue, Billingham Full length. Station Crescent, Billingham Full length. Stokesley Crescent, Billingham Full length. Swaledale Crescent, Billingham Full length. Wharfdale Avenue, Billingham Full length.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliamentary Constituencies (England) Order 2007
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No. 1681 REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE, ENGLAND REDISTRIBUTION OF SEATS The Parliamentary Constituencies (England) Order 2007 Made - - - - - 13th June 2007 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) £12.00 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No.1681 REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE, ENGLAND REDISTRIBUTION OF SEATS The Parliamentary Constituencies (England) Order 2007 Made - - - - 13th June 2007 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 13th day of June 2007 Present, The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council The Boundary Commission for England, in accordance with section 3(1) of the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986(a), submitted to the Secretary of State a report dated 31st October 2006 showing the parliamentary constituencies into which they recommend, in accordance with that Act, that England should be divided. A draft of this Order in Council together with a copy of the Boundary Commission’s report was laid before Parliament by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 3(5) of the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986, to give effect, without modifications, to the recommendations contained in the report, and each House of Parliament has by resolution approved the draft. Therefore, Her Majesty, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to make the following Order under section 4 of the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Parliamentary Constituencies (England) Order 2007. (2) This Order shall come into force on the fourteenth day after the day on which it is made. Parliamentary constituencies in England 2.—(1) England shall be divided into the parliamentary constituencies— (a) which are named in column 1 of the Table in the Schedule to this Order; (b) which are designated as being either county constituencies or borough constituencies by inclusion of those words beneath the name in column 1 of the Table in the Schedule; and (a) 1986 c.56.
    [Show full text]