Wood Boring Bark Beetles.Book

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wood Boring Bark Beetles.Book United States Department of New Pest Response Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Guidelines Inspection Service Exotic Wood-Boring and Bark Beetles Cooperating State Departments of Agriculture The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of any individuals income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication o program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. This document is not intended to be complete and exhaustive. It provides a foundation based upon available literature to assist in the development of appropriate and relevant regulatory activities. Some key publications were not available at the time of writing, and not all specialists and members of the research community were consulted in the preparation of this document. References to commercial suppliers or products should not be construed as an endorsement of the company or product by the USDA. All uses of pesticides must be registered or approved by appropriate Federal, State, and/or Tribal agencies before they can be applied. The information provided on pesticide labels may not reflect all of the actual information, including precautions and instructions for use, which you are required to follow in your specific State or locality. It is the responsibility of persons intending to use a pesticide to read and abide by the label, including labeling approved for the particular State or locality in which the chemical is to be used, and to comply with all Federal, State, Tribal, and local laws and regulations relating to the use of the pesticide. APHIS program staffs are responsible for their compliance with applicable environmental regulations. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife, if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. First edition issued 2011 Contents 1 Exotic Wood-Boring and Bark Beetles Contents i Figures v Tables xi Acknowledgements xiii How to Cite the Guidelines xiii Writers xiii Writer/Editor xiii Contributors xiii Assistance, Guidance and Review xiii Cover Image xiv Introduction 1-1 Contents 1 Purpose 1 Users 2 Pest Status 2 Contacts 3 Initiating an Emergency Pest Response Program 3 Preventing an Infestation 5 Scope 5 What the Guidelines Does Not Cover 6 Authorities 6 Resources 6 Program Safety 7 Support for Program Decisionmaking 7 How to Use the Guidelines 7 Conventions 8 Acknowledgements 11 How to Cite the Guidelines 11 How to Find More Information 11 Pest Information 2-1 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Classification 2 Pest Status 5 Economic Importance 5 Current and Potential Distribution and Detections 7 Damage to Host Plants 20 2/2011-1 Exotic Wood-Boring and Bark Beetles i Emergency and Domestic Programs Contents Hosts 26 Biology and Life Cycle 33 Environmental Impact 41 Identification 3-1 Contents 1 Introduction 1 Authorities 2 Reporting 2 Identifying 2 Description 3 Survey Procedures 4-1 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Preparation, Sanitization, and Clean-up 2 Survey Types 4 Detection Survey 5 Targeting and Site Selection 6 Survey Season and Timing 6 Sentinel Survey Sites 7 Delimiting Survey 7 Traceback and Trace-Forward Investigations 8 Monitoring Survey 8 Prediction of Insect Development 8 Trapping 10 Multi-Funnel Traps 11 Cross-Vane Panel Traps 13 Attractant Lures 15 Trap Placement and Density 17 Trap Setup 17 Collection of Trap Contents 18 Trap Trees 19 Pest-Specific Trapping and Lures 20 Visual Inspection 22 Pest-Specific Visual Inspection 23 Survey Records 40 Regulatory Procedures 5-1 Contents 1 Introduction 1 Instructions to Officials 1 Regulatory Actions and Authorities 2 Tribal Governments 3 Overview of Regulatory Program After Detection 4 Record-Keeping 4 Issuing an Emergency Action Notification 5 ii Exotic Wood-Boring and Bark Beetles 2/2011-1 Emergency and Domestic Programs Contents Regulated Area Requirements Under Regulatory Control 5 Establishing a Federal Regulatory Area or Action 5 Regulatory Records 6 Use of Chemicals 6 Control Procedures 6-1 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Overview of Emergency Programs 2 Treatment Options 3 Environmental Documentation and Monitoring 3 Efficacy of Treatment 3 Site Assessment 4 Safeguarding Against Artificial Movement 4 Chemical Controls 5 Pest-Specific Chemical Controls 6 EPA Registered Insecticides 8 Cultural Controls 10 Pest-Specific Cultural Controls 11 Biological Controls 13 Other Control Methods 14 Environmental Compliance 7-1 Content 1 Introduction 1 Overview 1 National Environmental Policy Act 2 Categorical Exclusion 2 Environmental Impact Statement 2 Environmental Assessment 3 Environmental Monitoring 3 Biological Assessment 4 Pathways 8-1 Contents 1 Introduction 1 Interceptions 1 Countries of Origin 3 Destinations 4 Risk 5 Solid Wood Packing Material 5 References References-1 Publications, Web Sites, and Other 1 Glossary Glossary-1 Resources A-1 Forms B-1 Contents 1 2/2011-1 Exotic Wood-Boring and Bark Beetles iii Emergency and Domestic Programs Contents PPQ 391 Specimens For Determination 2 PPQ 523 Emergency Action Notification 7 How to Submit Bark Beetle Specimens C-1 Taxonomic Support for Surveys D-1 Key to Help Screen Tomicus piniperda E-1 Key for Separating Tomicus Bark Beetles F-1 Natural Enemies G-1 Contents 1 Wasp Watcher Brochure H-1 Index Index-1 iv Exotic Wood-Boring and Bark Beetles 2/2011-1 Emergency and Domestic Programs Figures 1 Exotic Wood-Boring and Bark Beetles Figure 2-1 Host Risk Map for Agrilus biguttatus Fabricius in the Continental United States 2-9 Figure 2-2 Final Risk Map for Monochamus saltuarius Gebler in the Continental United States 2-11 Figure 2-3 Host Risk Map for Monochamus sutor Linnaeus in the Continental United States 2-13 Figure 2-4 Host Risk Map for Tetropium castaneum Linnaeus in the Continental United States 2-15 Figure 2-5 Host Risk Map for Tetropium fuscum Fabricius in the Continental United States 2-17 Figure 2-6 Host Risk Map for Platypus quercivorus Murayama (Platypodinae) in the Continental United States 2-18 Figure 2-7 Final Risk Map for Tomicus destruens Wollaston (Scolytinae) in the Continental United States 2-20 Figure 3-1 Final Stage Larva of Agrilus biguttatus Fabricius (Buprestidae) (Louis-Michel Nageleisen, Département de la Santé des Forêts, http:// www.bugwood.org) 3-6 Figure 3-2 Pupae of Agrilus biguttatus Fabricius (Buprestidae) (Louis-Michel Nageleisen, Département de la Santé des Forêts, http://www.bugwood.org) 3-6 Figure 3-3 Dorsal View of Agrilus biguttatus (Natasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, http:// www.bugwood.org) 3-7 Figure 3-4 Side View of Agrilus biguttatus (Natasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, http:// www.bugwood.org) 3-7 Figure 3-5 Adult of Agrilus biguttatus (Andrea Battisti, Università di Padova, http://www.bugwood.org UGA1329046) 3-8 Figure 3-6 Adult of Agrilus ater (Christoph Benisch, http://www.kerbtier.de/) 3-9 Figure 3-7 Adult of Agrilus guerini (Zdenk Chalupa and Petr Horsák) 3-9 Figure 3-8 Adult of Monochamus saltuarius (Cyorgy Csoka, Hungary Forest Research Institute, Hungary, http://www.bugwood.org UGA1231144) 3-12 Figure 3-9 Adult of Monochamus carolinensis (Natasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, http:// www.bugwood.org) 3-13 Figure 3-10 Adult Monochamus titillator (Natasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, http://www.bugwood.org) 3-13 2/2011-1 Exotic Wood-Boring and Bark Beetles v Emergency and Domestic Programs Figures Figure 3-11 Side View of Adult Monochamus titillator (Natasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, http:// www.bugwood.org) 3-14 Figure 3-12 Adult of Monochamus alternatus (Pest and Diseases Image Library, http://www.bugwood.org) 3-14 Figure 3-13 Dorsal View of Adult of Monochamus alternatus (Pest and Diseases Image Library, http://www.bugwood.org UGA2154049) 3-16 Figure 3-14 Ventral View of Adult Monochamus sutor (Christopher Pierce, USDA–APHIS–PPQ, http://www.bugwood.org UGA2154050) 3-17 Figure 3-15 Dorsal View of Adult Monochamus scutellatus (Natasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, http:// www.bugwood.org) 3-17 Figure 3-16 Side View of Adult Monochamus scutellatus (Natasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, http:// www.bugwood.org) 3-18 Figure 3-17 Larva and Frass of Tetropium castaneum Linnaeus (Stanislaw Kinelski, Poland, http://www.bugwood.org UGA1258315) 3-20 Figure 3-18 Pupa of Tetropium castaneum Linnaeus (Stanislaw Kinelski, http:/ /www.bugwood.org UGA1258317) 3-20 Figure 3-19 Adult of Tetropium castaneum (Gyorgy Csoka, Hungary Forest Research Institute, Hungary, http://www.bugwood.org UGA1231097) 3-21 Figure 3-20 Larva of Tetropium fuscum Fabricius (Stephanie Sopow, Natural Resources Canada, http://www.bugwood.org UGA 5331018) 3-23 Figure 3-21 Pupa of Tetropium fuscum Fabricius with Larval Exuvia (Stephanie Sopow, Natural Resources Canada, http://www.bugwood.org UGA5331016) 3-23 Figure 3-22 Adult of Tetropium fuscum Fabricius adult (Stanislaw Kinelski, Poland, http://www.bugwood.org UGA1258311) 3-24 Figure 3-23 Adult Male of Tetropium cinnamopterum (S. Sopow, Canadian Forest Service) 3-25 Figure 3-24 Adult Male of Tetropium schwarzianum (S.
Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • First Detection of Pine Wood Nematode Vector, Monochamus Sutor Sutor (Linnaeus, 1758) in Lebanon (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae)
    Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, 121 (4), 2016 : 455-460. First detection of Pine Wood Nematode Vector, Monochamus sutor sutor (Linnaeus, 1758) in Lebanon (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) by Zinette MOUSSA1, Christian COCQUEMPOT2 & Dany YAMMOUNI1 1 Laboratory of Entomology − Lebanese Agricultural Research Institute, Fanar, Lebanon <[email protected]> <[email protected]> 2 INRA, UMR CBGP, Campus International de Baillarguet, F − 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France <[email protected]> Abstract. − An adult of Monochamus (Monochamus) sutor sutor (Linnaeus, 1758) has been found alive in Lebanon in 2014. This potential vector of the phytoparasitic pine nematodes Bursaphelenchus spp., the causal agents of pine wilt disease, is a serious threat to Lebanese forest. The circumstances of the discovery are given, followed by information about the genera Monochamus and Bursaphelenchus applied to Lebanon. An evaluation of the risk for forests of Lebanon is specified. Résumé. − Premier signalement du vecteur du Nématode du Pin, Monochamus sutor sutor (Linnaeus, 1758) au Liban (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae). Un adulte de Monochamus (Monochamus) sutor sutor (Linnaeus, 1758) vivant a été découvert au Liban en 2014. Ce vecteur potentiel des Nématodes phytoparasites Bursaphe lenchus spp., agents du dépérissement des Conifères, représente une menace sérieuse pour la forêt libanaise. Les circonstances de la découverte sont données et suivies des informations sur les genres Monochamus et Bursaphelenchus appliquées au Liban. Une évaluation du risque encouru par les forêts du Liban est précisée. Keywords. − Bursaphelenchus spp., Pine wilt disease, Lebanon, interception, risks. _________________ Monochamus Dejean, 1821 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) is a large genus of wood-boring beetles comprising approximately 150 species reported in Asia, Europe, Africa and North America (VILLIERS, 1978; USDA-APHIS, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Dlhokrčky (Raphidioptera) Ostrova Kopáč
    VIDLIČKA, Ľ. 2007: Dlhokrčky (Raphidioptera) ostrova Kopáč Dlhokrčky (Raphidioptera) ostrova Kopáč (Bratislava) Ľubomír VIDLIČKA Ústav zoológie SAV, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 06 Bratislava e-mail: [email protected] Úvod Dlhokrčky (Raphidioptera) sú veľmi malá skupina hmyzu (okolo 200 druhov, 2 čeľade) rozšírená hlavne v palearktickej oblasti (Európa, Ázia), menej v holoarktickej oblasti (len na západe USA) a okrajovo v orientálnej oblasti. Larvy aj dospelce sú suchozemskými predátormi. Larvy väčšiny druhov žijú pod kôrou stromov a krov, zriedkavo aj na povrchu pôdy a v skalných puklinách. Imága sú charakteristické predĺženou predohruďou (od toho je odvodený slovenský názov). Je to malý až stredne veľký hmyz, v rozpätí krídiel dosahujú 1-4 cm. Zo Slovenska je doteraz známych len 9 druhov z 2 čeľadí (ZELENÝ, 1977). Zo susednej Moravy je známych 10 druhov. Druh Parainocellia braueri (ALBARDA, 1891) zistený na južnej Morave (CHLÁDEK, ZELENÝ, 1995; ŠEVČÍK, 1997) sa pravdepodobne tiež vyskytuje na juhu Slovenska. Výskum dlhokrčiek nebol doteraz na Slovensku systematicky robený. Prvé konkrétne údaje prináša MOCSÁRY (1899) vo Fauna regni Hungariae. Zo Slovenska uvádza 4 druhy (Raphidia notata, Raphidia ophiopsis, Raphidia flavipes a Raphidia xanthostigma). PONGRÁCZ (1914) uvádza z územia Slovenska už 7 druhov (doplnil Raphidia major, Raphidia ratzeburgi a Inocellia crassicornis). Posledné dva druhy doplnili BARTOŠ (1967) (A. nigricollis) a ZELENÝ (1977) (Raphidia cognata = confinis). BARTOŠ (1965) opísal zo Slovenska (z Lozorna na západnom Slovensku) dokonca nový druh dlhokrčky Raphidia barbata, ale ten bol o pár rokov synonymizovaný s druhom Raphidia ophiopsis LINNAEUS, 1758, ktorý je veľmi variabilný (ZELENÝ, 1969). Z okolia Bratislavy sú z literatúry známe iba dva druhy - Raphidia flavipes z Bratislavy a Raphidia major zo Sv.
    [Show full text]
  • Hohestein – Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 2
    Naturw.res.07-A4:Layout 1 09.11.2007 13:10 Uhr Seite 1 HESSEN Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, HESSEN ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz www.hmulv.hessen.de Naturwaldreservate in Hessen HOHESTEINHOHESTEIN ZOOLOGISCHEZOOLOGISCHE UNTERSUCHUNGENUNTERSUCHUNGEN Zoologische Untersuchungen – Naturwaldreservate in Hessen Naturwaldreservate Hohestein NO OO 7/2.2 NN 7/2.27/2.2 Naturwaldreservate in Hessen 7/2.2 Hohestein Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 2 Wolfgang H. O. Dorow Jens-Peter Kopelke mit Beiträgen von Andreas Malten & Theo Blick (Araneae) Pavel Lauterer (Psylloidea) Frank Köhler & Günter Flechtner (Coleoptera) Mitteilungen der Hessischen Landesforstverwaltung, Band 42 Impressum Herausgeber: Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Mainzer Str. 80 65189 Wiesbaden Landesbetrieb Hessen-Forst Bertha-von-Suttner-Str. 3 34131 Kassel Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt Grätzelstr. 2 37079 Göttingen http://www.nw-fva.de Dieser Band wurde in wissenschaftlicher Kooperation mit dem Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg erstellt. – Mitteilungen der Hessischen Landesforstverwaltung, Band 42 – Titelfoto: Der Schnellkäfer Denticollis rubens wurde im Naturwaldreservat „Hohestein“ nur selten gefunden. Die stark gefährdete Art entwickelt sich in feuchtem, stärker verrottetem Buchenholz. (Foto: Frank Köhler) Layout: Eva Feltkamp, 60486 Frankfurt Druck: Elektra Reprographischer Betrieb GmbH, 65527 Niedernhausen Umschlaggestaltung: studio
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use
    Diversity and resource choice of flower-visiting insects in relation to pollen nutritional quality and land use Diversität und Ressourcennutzung Blüten besuchender Insekten in Abhängigkeit von Pollenqualität und Landnutzung Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor rerum naturalium genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl. Biologin Christiane Natalie Weiner aus Köln Berichterstatter (1. Referent): Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Mitberichterstatter (2. Referent): Prof. Dr. Andreas Jürgens Tag der Einreichung: 26.02.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.04.2016 Darmstadt 2016 D17 2 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit entsprechend den Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis selbständig und ohne unzulässige Hilfe Dritter angefertigt habe. Sämtliche aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Gedanken sowie sämtliche von Anderen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Daten, Techniken und Materialien sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher keiner anderen Hochschule zu Prüfungszwecken eingereicht. Osterholz-Scharmbeck, den 24.02.2016 3 4 My doctoral thesis is based on the following manuscripts: Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2011): Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower-visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology 12 (4), 292-299. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2014): Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology 95, 466–474. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M , Blüthgen, N. (in prep.): Land-use intensification triggers diversity loss in pollination networks: Regional distinctions between three different German bioregions Weiner, C.N., Hilpert, A., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report 1
    Sand pit for Biodiversity at Cep II quarry Researcher: Klára Řehounková Research group: Petr Bogusch, David Boukal, Milan Boukal, Lukáš Čížek, František Grycz, Petr Hesoun, Kamila Lencová, Anna Lepšová, Jan Máca, Pavel Marhoul, Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek, Lenka Schmidtmayerová, Robert Tropek Březen – září 2012 Abstract We compared the effect of restoration status (technical reclamation, spontaneous succession, disturbed succession) on the communities of vascular plants and assemblages of arthropods in CEP II sand pit (T řebo ňsko region, SW part of the Czech Republic) to evaluate their biodiversity and conservation potential. We also studied the experimental restoration of psammophytic grasslands to compare the impact of two near-natural restoration methods (spontaneous and assisted succession) to establishment of target species. The sand pit comprises stages of 2 to 30 years since site abandonment with moisture gradient from wet to dry habitats. In all studied groups, i.e. vascular pants and arthropods, open spontaneously revegetated sites continuously disturbed by intensive recreation activities hosted the largest proportion of target and endangered species which occurred less in the more closed spontaneously revegetated sites and which were nearly absent in technically reclaimed sites. Out results provide clear evidence that the mosaics of spontaneously established forests habitats and open sand habitats are the most valuable stands from the conservation point of view. It has been documented that no expensive technical reclamations are needed to restore post-mining sites which can serve as secondary habitats for many endangered and declining species. The experimental restoration of rare and endangered plant communities seems to be efficient and promising method for a future large-scale restoration projects in abandoned sand pits.
    [Show full text]
  • Superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- Tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää
    20 © Sahlbergia Vol. 12: 20–32, 2007 Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää Winqvist, K. & Kahanpää, J. 2007: Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Diptera: Brachycera). — Sahlbergia 12:20-32, Helsinki, Finland, ISSN 1237-3273. Another part of the updated checklist of Finnish flies is presented. This part covers the families Lonchaeidae, Pallopteridae, Piophilidae, Platystomatidae, Tephritidae, Ulididae, Coelopidae, Dryomyzidae, Heterocheilidae, Phaeomyii- dae, Sciomyzidae and Sepsidae. Eight species are recorded from Finland for the first time. The following ten species have been erroneously reported from Finland and are here deleted from the Finnish checklist: Chaetolonchaea das- yops (Meigen, 1826), Earomyia crystallophila (Becker, 1895), Lonchaea hirti- ceps Zetterstedt, 1837, Lonchaea laticornis Meigen, 1826, Prochyliza lundbecki (Duda, 1924), Campiglossa achyrophori (Loew, 1869), Campiglossa irrorata (Fallén, 1814), Campiglossa tessellata (Loew, 1844), Dioxyna sororcula (Wie- demann, 1830) and Tephritis nigricauda (Loew, 1856). The Finnish records of Lonchaeidae: Lonchaea bruggeri Morge, Lonchaea contigua Collin, Lonchaea difficilis Hackman and Piophilidae: Allopiophila dudai (Frey) are considered dubious. The total number of species of Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea found from Finland is now 262. Kaj Winqvist, Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Email: [email protected] Jere Kahanpää, Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland. Email: kahanpaa@iki.fi Introduction new millennium there was no concentrated The last complete checklist of Finnish Dipte- Finnish effort to study just these particular ra was published in Hackman (1980a, 1980b). groups. Consequently, before our work the Recent checklists of Finnish species have level of knowledge on Finnish fauna in these been published for ‘lower Brachycera’ i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings, 23Rd U.S. Department of Agriculture Interagency Research
    United States Department of Proceedings Agriculture 23rd U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northern Interagency Research Forum on Research Station Invasive Species 2012 General Technical Report NRS-P-114 The findings and conclusions of each article in this publication are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service. All articles were received in digital format and were edited for uniform type and style. Each author is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her paper. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal, agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fi sh or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. Cover graphic by Vincent D’Amico, U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station. Manuscript received for publication August 2012 Published by: For additional copies: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Coleoptera Emergent from Various Decay Classes of Downed Coarse Woody Debris in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 11-30-2012 Comparison of Coleoptera emergent from various decay classes of downed coarse woody debris in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA Michael L. Ferro Louisiana State Arthropod Museum, [email protected] Matthew L. Gimmel Louisiana State University AgCenter, [email protected] Kyle E. Harms Louisiana State University, [email protected] Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Ferro, Michael L.; Gimmel, Matthew L.; Harms, Kyle E.; and Carlton, Christopher E., "Comparison of Coleoptera emergent from various decay classes of downed coarse woody debris in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA" (2012). Insecta Mundi. 773. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/773 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA A Journal of World Insect Systematics MUNDI 0260 Comparison of Coleoptera emergent from various decay classes of downed coarse woody debris in Great Smoky Mountains Na- tional Park, USA Michael L. Ferro Louisiana State Arthropod Museum, Department of Entomology Louisiana State University Agricultural Center 402 Life Sciences Building Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, U.S.A. [email protected] Matthew L. Gimmel Division of Entomology Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas 1501 Crestline Drive, Suite 140 Lawrence, KS, 66045, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Our Partnerships Fomentando Nuestra Colaboración
    Proceedings of the 1st Joint Meeting of the 12th National Symposium on Forest Parasites and the 54th Western Forest Insect Work Conference (WFIWC) Memorias de la Primera Reunión Conjunta XII Simposio Nacional de Parasitología Forestal y 54ava Conferencia de Entomología Forestal del Oeste Guadalajara, México November 3-6, 2003 Enhancing our Partnerships Fomentando Nuestra Colaboración i Proceedings of the 1st Joint Meeting of the 12th National Symposium on Forest Parasites and the 54th Western Forest Insect Work Conference (WFIWC) Memorias de la Primera Reunión Conjunta XII Simposio Nacional de Parasitología Forestal y 54ava Conferencia de Entomología Forestal del Oeste Guadalajara, Mexico November 3-6, 2003 Enhancing our Partnerships Fomentando Nuestra Colaboración Compiled by / Recopilación de: Brytten E. Steed USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection 4746 S. 1900 E. Ogden UT 84403, USA NOT FOR CITATION / NO USAR PARA REFERENCIA INFORMATION FOR CONFERENCE MEMBERS ONLY / INFORMACIÓN SOLAMENTE PARA MIEMBROS DE LA CONFERENCIA The contents of these proceedings are not available for citation or publication without consent of the author. Articles were reformatted but printed approximately as submitted. Authors are responsible for content. El contenido de este documento no esta disponible para citar o publicar sin el consentimiento del autor. Los artículos fueron reformateados pero impresos aproximadamente como fueron remitidos. Los autores son los responsables del contenido. i ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITTEES / COMITES ORGANIZADORES Steering
    [Show full text]
  • The Biodiversity of Flying Coleoptera Associated With
    THE BIODIVERSITY OF FLYING COLEOPTERA ASSOCIATED WITH INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT OF THE DOUGLAS-FIR BEETLE (Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins) IN INTERIOR DOUGLAS-FIR (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco). By Susanna Lynn Carson B. Sc., The University of Victoria, 1994 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Zoology) We accept this thesis as conforming To t(p^-feguired standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 2002 © Susanna Lynn Carson, 2002 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. 1 further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) Abstract Increasing forest management resulting from bark beetle attack in British Columbia's forests has created a need to assess the impact of single species management on local insect biodiversity. In the Fort St James Forest District, in central British Columbia, Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco) (Fd) grows at the northern limit of its North American range. At the district level the species is rare (representing 1% of timber stands), and in the early 1990's growing populations of the Douglas-fir beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsuage Hopkins) threatened the loss of all mature Douglas-fir habitat in the district.
    [Show full text]