DOCSLIB.ORG

Radiobiology Study Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Radiobiology Study Guide 2020 ASTRO RADIATION/CANCER BIOLOGY STUDY GUIDE Produced by the Radiation/Cancer Biology Study Guide Taskforce of American Society for Radiation Oncology Copyright © 2020 American Society for Radiation Oncology If you notice and errors or have feedback about this document, please contact: Gayle Woloschak, PhD, Professor Departments of Radiation Oncology and Radiology Robert E. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University 303 E. Chicago Avenue, Ward 13-002 Chicago, IL 60611 Tel: 312-503-4312 Email: [email protected] Kathryn Huber, MD, PhD Tufts Medical Center 800 Washington St. Box 359 Boston, MA 0211 Email: [email protected] 1 Editors-in-Chief (2020) Gayle E. Woloschak, Ph.D. Northwestern University Medical School Kathryn Huber, MD, PhD Tufts Medical Center Editors-in-Chief (2014) Gayle E. Woloschak, Ph.D. Northwestern University Medical School Christopher Barker, M.D. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Editor-in-Chief (2006-2012) Barry S. Rosenstein, Ph.D. Mount Sinai School of Medicine NYU School of Medicine Associate Editors 2020 Bryan Allen, MD, PhD Sunil Krishnan, MD, FASTRO University of Iowa Mayo Clinic, Florida David Mayhew, MD, PhD Dorthe Schaue, PhD Tufts Medical Center University of California, Los Angeles Douglas Spitz, PhD Ranjit Bindra, MD, PhD University of Iowa Yale University Yaacov Lawrence, MD, MRCP Zhiyuan Shen, PhD Sheba Medical Center Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey Naoyuki Saito, MD, PhD Indiana University School of Medicine Associate Editors (2013) Elizabeth Balcer-Kubiczek, Ph.D. David Gius, M. D., Ph. D. University of Maryland School of Medicine Northwestern University Medical School Beth Beadle, M. D., Ph.D. Martin Hauer-Jensen, Ph. D. Univ. Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Univ. Arkansas School of Medicine Eleanor Blakely, Ph. D. Michael Joiner, Ph. D. Wayne State Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory University 2 Juong G. Rhee, Ph.D. Michael D. Story, Ph.D. University of Texas University of Maryland School of Medicine Southwestern Medical Center Navesh K. Sharma, Ph.D., D.O. Phuoc Tran, M. D., Ph. D. University of Maryland School of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Medicine Brian Marples, Ph. D. Zhiyuan Shen, M.D., Ph.D. UMDNJ-Robert William Beaumont Hospital Wood Johnson Medical School Associate Editors (2011-2012) Elizabeth Balcer-Kubiczek, Ph.D. Brad G. Wouters, Ph.D. University of Maryland School of Medicine Ontario Institute for Cancer Research Christopher Barker, M.D. Michael E.C. Robbins, Ph.D. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Wake Forest University School of Medicine Michael C. Joiner, Ph.D. Juong G. Rhee Ph.D. Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University of Maryland School of Medicine University School of Medicine Navesh K. Sharma, Ph.D., D.O. David G. Kirsch, M.D., Ph.D. University of Maryland School of Medicine Duke University Medical Center Zhiyuan Shen, M.D., Ph.D. Brian Marples, PhD UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School William Beaumont Hospital Michael D. Story, Ph.D. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Associate Editors (2006-2011) Kathryn D. Held, Ph.D. Jacqueline Williams, Ph.D. Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General University of Rochester Medical Center Hospital Elaine M. Zeman, Ph.D. Sara Rockwell, Ph.D. University of North Carolina School of Medicine Yale University School of Medicine Contributors Joan Allalunis-Turner, Ph.D. Elizabeth K. Balcer-Kubiczek, Ph.D. University Cross Cancer Institute of Maryland School of Medicine Sally A. Amundson, Ph.D. Kevin A. Camphausen, M.D. National Columbia University Cancer Institute/NIH 3 Theodore L. DeWeese, M.D. Johns Hopkins David Kirsch, M.D., Ph.D. University School of Medicine Duke University School of Medicine Evan B. Douple, Ph.D. The National Academies Amy Kronenberg, Sc.D. Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman, Ph.D. Memorial Sloan- William F. Morgan, Ph.D. Kettering Cancer Center Pacific Notrhwest National Laboratory Dennis E. Hallahan, M.D. John P. Murnane, Ph.D. Vanderbilt University University of California, San Francisco Martin Hauer-Jensen, M.D., Ph.D. Peggy L. Olive, Ph.D. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences British Columbia Cancer Research Centre Kathryn D. Held, Ph.D. Martin Pruschy, Ph.D. Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General University Hospital Zurich Hospital Sara Rockwell, Ph.D. Richard P. Hill, Ph.D. Yale University School of Medicine Ontario Cancer Institute Michael E.C. Robbins, Ph.D. Rakesh K. Jain, Ph.D. Harvard Medical School Wake Forest University School of Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Joseph L. Roti Roti, Ph.D. Henning Willers, M.D. Washington University School of Medicine Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital Carolyn I. Sartor, M.D. University of North Carolina School of Medicine Jacqueline Williams, Ph.D. University of Rochester Medical Center Joann Sweasy, Ph.D. Yale University School of Medicine Elaine M. Zeman, Ph.D. University of North Carolina School of Medicine Marie-Catherine Vozenin-Brotons Ph.D. Institut Gustave Roussy Daniel Zips, Ph.D. Technical University Dresde Gayle E. Woloschak, Ph.D. Northwestern University Medical School 4 Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Radiation-Matter Interactions .............................................................................................................................. 7 DNA Damage Mechanisms ................................................................................................................................... 9 DNA Repair Mechanisms .................................................................................................................................... 10 Chromosome Damage ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Cell Death Mechanisms ...................................................................................................................................... 16 Survival Assay ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Cell Survival Models ........................................................................................................................................... 21 Linear Energy Transfer ....................................................................................................................................... 24 Oxygen Effect ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 Cellular Repair .................................................................................................................................................... 28 Tumor Assay Systems ......................................................................................................................................... 30 Tumor Biology and Microenvironment .............................................................................................................. 32 Cell and Tissue Kinetics ...................................................................................................................................... 38 Molecular Signaling ............................................................................................................................................ 42 Cancer ................................................................................................................................................................ 44 Total Body Irradiation......................................................................................................................................... 50 Normal Tissue Response .................................................................................................................................... 52 Therapeutic Ratio ............................................................................................................................................... 58 Time, Dose, Fractionation .................................................................................................................................. 60 Brachytherapy .................................................................................................................................................... 62 Alternative Delivery Systems .............................................................................................................................. 63 Chemotherapy.................................................................................................................................................... 65 Radiation Modifying Drugs ................................................................................................................................. 68 Hyperthermia ..................................................................................................................................................... 71 Radiation Carcinogenesis ................................................................................................................................... 72 Heritable Effects ................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Time, Dose and Fractionation in Radiotherapy
    2/25/2013 The introduction of Fractionation 2-13/13 Radiobiology lecture Time, Dose and Fractionation in Radiotherapy The Four Rs of Radiobiology Repair of Sublethal Damage • Cells exposed to sparse radiation experience • Efficacy of fractionation based on the 4 Rs: sublethal injury that can be repaired – Repair of sublethal damage • Cell killing requires a greater total dose when given –Repopulation in several fractions – Reassortment of cells within the cell cycle • Most tissue repair occurs in about 3 hours and up –Reoxygenation to 24 hours post radiation • Allows for repair of injured normal tissue and gives a potential therapeutic advantage over tumor cells Reoxygenation Redistribution • Oxygen stabilizes free radicals • Position in cell cycle at time of radiation • Hypoxic cells require more radiation to kill determines sensitivity •Hypoxic tumors • S phase is radioresistant – Temporary vessel constriction •G2 phase delay results in increased radiation – Outgrowth of blood supply and capillary collapse resistance • Tumor shrinkage reduces hypoxic areas • Fractionated RT redistributes cells • Reinforces fractionated dosing • Rapidly cycling cells like mucosa, skin are more sensitive • Slower cyclers like connective tissue, brain are spared 1 2/25/2013 Repopulation • Increased regeneration of surviving fraction Basics of Fractionation • Rapidly proliferating tumors regenerate faster • Determines the length and timing of therapy course • Dividing a dose into several fractions spares normal tissues • Accelerated Repopulation – Repair
    [Show full text]
  • The Utilization of MOSFET Dosimeters for Clinical Measurements in Radiology
    The Utilization of MOSFET Dosimeters for Clinical Measurements in Radiology David Hintenlang, Ph.D., DABR, FACMP Medical Physics Program Director J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering Medical Physics Program Conflict of interest statement: The presenter holds no financial interest in, and has no affiliation or research support from any manufacturer or distributor of MOSFET Dosimetry systems. J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering Medical Physics Program The MOSFET Dosimeter • Metal oxide silicon field effect transistor • Uniquely packaged to serve as a radiation detector – developed as early as 1974 • Applications – Radiation Therapy Dose Verification – Cosmic dose monitoring on satellites – Radiology • ~ 1998 - present J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering Medical Physics Program Attractive features • Purely electronic dosimeter • Provides immediate dose feedback • Integrates over short periods of time • Small size and portability • Simultaneous measurements (up to 20) J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering Medical Physics Program Demonstrated radiology applications – Patient dose monitoring/evaluation • Radiography • Fluoroscopic and interventional procedures • CT • Mammography J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering Medical Physics Program Principles of operation • Ionizing radiation results in the creation of electron-hole pairs • Holes migrate and build up
    [Show full text]
  • 小型飛翔体／海外 ［Format 2］ Technical Catalog Category
    小型飛翔体／海外 ［Format 2］ Technical Catalog Category Airborne contamination sensor Title Depth Evaluation of Entrained Products (DEEP) Proposed by Create Technologies Ltd & Costain Group PLC １．DEEP is a sensor analysis software for analysing contamination. DEEP can distinguish between surface contamination and internal / absorbed contamination. The software measures contamination depth by analysing distortions in the gamma spectrum. The method can be applied to data gathered using any spectrometer. Because DEEP provides a means of discriminating surface contamination from other radiation sources, DEEP can be used to provide an estimate of surface contamination without physical sampling. DEEP is a real-time method which enables the user to generate a large number of rapid contamination assessments- this data is complementary to physical samples, providing a sound basis for extrapolation from point samples. It also helps identify anomalies enabling targeted sampling startegies. DEEP is compatible with small airborne spectrometer/ processor combinations, such as that proposed by the ARM-U project – please refer to the ARM-U proposal for more details of the air vehicle. Figure 1: DEEP system core components are small, light, low power and can be integrated via USB, serial or Ethernet interfaces. 小型飛翔体／海外 Figure 2: DEEP prototype software ２．Past experience (plants in Japan, overseas plant, applications in other industries, etc) Create technologies is a specialist R&D firm with a focus on imaging and sensing in the nuclear industry. Createc has developed and delivered several novel nuclear technologies, including the N-Visage gamma camera system. Costainis a leading UK construction and civil engineering firm with almost 150 years of history.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Anti-Oxidant Protection Against Ionizing Radiation in Bdelloid Rotifers
    Extreme anti-oxidant protection against ionizing radiation in bdelloid rotifers Anita Kriskoa,b, Magali Leroya, Miroslav Radmana,b, and Matthew Meselsonc,1 aInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unit 1001, Faculté de Médecine Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75751 Paris Cedex 15, France; bMediterranean Institute for Life Sciences, 21000 Split, Croatia; and cDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Contributed by Matthew Meselson, December 6, 2011 (sent for review November 10, 2011) Bdelloid rotifers, a class of freshwater invertebrates, are extraor- in A. vaga as in other eukaryotes, and its genome is not smaller dinarily resistant to ionizing radiation (IR). Their radioresistance is than that of C. elegans (1). Instead, it has been proposed that a not caused by reduced susceptibility to DNA double-strand break- major contributor to bdelloid radiation resistance is an enhanced age for IR makes double-strand breaks (DSBs) in bdelloids with capacity for scavenging reactive molecular species generated by IR essentially the same efficiency as in other species, regardless of and that the proteins and other cellular components thereby radiosensitivity. Instead, we find that the bdelloid Adineta vaga is protected include those essential for the repair of DSBs but not far more resistant to IR-induced protein carbonylation than is the DNA itself (1). In agreement with this explanation, we find that much more radiosensitive nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.In A. vaga is far more resistant than C. elegans to IR-induced protein both species, the dose–response for protein carbonylation parallels carbonylation, a reaction of hydroxyl radicals with accessible side that for fecundity reduction, manifested as embryonic death.
    [Show full text]
  • Exemplifying an Archetypal Thorium-EPS Complexation by Novel Thoriotolerant Providencia Thoriotolerans
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Exemplifying an archetypal thorium‑EPS complexation by novel thoriotolerant Providencia thoriotolerans AM3 Arpit Shukla 1,2, Paritosh Parmar 1, Dweipayan Goswami 1, Baldev Patel1 & Meenu Saraf 1* It is the acquisition of unique traits that adds to the enigma of microbial capabilities to carry out extraordinary processes. One such ecosystem is the soil exposed to radionuclides, in the vicinity of atomic power stations. With the aim to study thorium (Th) tolerance in the indigenous bacteria of such soil, the bacteria were isolated and screened for maximum thorium tolerance. Out of all, only one strain AM3, found to tolerate extraordinary levels of Th (1500 mg L−1), was identifed to be belonging to genus Providencia and showed maximum genetic similarity with the type strain P. vermicola OP1T. This is the frst report suggesting any bacteria to tolerate such high Th and we propose to term such microbes as ‘thoriotolerant’. The medium composition for cultivating AM3 was optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) which also led to an improvement in its Th‑tolerance capabilities by 23%. AM3 was found to be a good producer of EPS and hence one component study was also employed for its optimization. Moreover, the EPS produced by the strain showed interaction with Th, which was deduced by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Te afermaths of atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1945), more than 2000 nuclear tests (1945–2017), the Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster (1986) and more recently, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (2011), highlight the release of considerable radioactive waste (radwaste) to the environment use of various radionuclides has led to the creation of considerable radioactive waste (radwaste).
    [Show full text]
  • Basics of Radiation Radiation Safety Orientation Open Source Booklet 1 (June 1, 2018)
    Basics of Radiation Radiation Safety Orientation Open Source Booklet 1 (June 1, 2018) Before working with radioactive material, it is helpful to recall… Radiation is energy released from a source. • Light is a familiar example of energy traveling some distance from its source. We understand that a light bulb can remain in one place and the light can move toward us to be detected by our eyes. • The Electromagnetic Spectrum is the entire range of wavelengths or frequencies of electromagnetic radiation extending from gamma rays to the longest radio waves and includes visible light. Radioactive materials release energy with enough power to cause ionizations and are on the high end of the electromagnetic spectrum. • Although our bodies cannot sense ionizing radiation, it is helpful to think ionizing radiation behaves similarly to light. o Travels in straight lines with decreasing intensity farther away from the source o May be reflected off certain surfaces (but not all) o Absorbed when interacting with materials You will be using radioactive material that releases energy in the form of ionizing radiation. Knowing about the basics of radiation will help you understand how to work safely with radioactive material. What is “ionizing radiation”? • Ionizing radiation is energy with enough power to remove tightly bound electrons from the orbit of an atom, causing the atom to become charged or ionized. • The charged atoms can damage the internal structures of living cells. The material near the charged atom absorbs the energy causing chemical bonds to break. Are all radioactive materials the same? No, not all radioactive materials are the same.
    [Show full text]
  • G20070354/G20070331 Fact Sheet, Biological Effects of Radiation
    Fact Sheet 11 Ofice of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 E-mail : opa @nrc.g ov I Biological Effects of Radiation Background Radiation is all around us. It is naturally present in our environment and has been since the birth of this planet. Consequently, life has evolved in an environment which has significant levels of ionizing radiation. It comes from outer space (cosmic), the ground (terrestrial), and even from within our own bodies. It is present in the air we breathe, the food we eat, the water we drink, and in the construction materials used to build our homes. Certain foods such as bananas and brazil nuts naturally contain higher levels of radiation than other foods. Brick and stone homes have higher natural radiation levels than homes made of other building materials such as wood. Our nation's Capitol, which is largely constructed of granite, contains higher levels of natural radiation than most homes. Levels of natural or background radiation can vary greatly from one location to the next. For example, people residing in Colorado are exposed to more natural radiation than residents of the east or west coast because Colorado has more cosmic radiation at a higher altitude and more terrestrial radiation from soils enriched in naturally occurring uranium. Furthermore, a lot of our natural exposure is due to radon, a gas from the earth's crust that is present in the air we breathe. The average annual radiation exposure from natural sources to an individual in the United States is about 300 millirem (3 millisieverts)*. Radon gas accounts for two-thirds of this exposure, while cosmic, terrestrial, and internal radiation account for the remainder.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiment "Gamma Dosimetry and Dose Rate Determination" Instruction for Experiment "Gamma Dosimetry and Dose Rate Determination"
    TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY DRESDEN Institute of Power Engineering Training Reactor Reactor Training Course Experiment "Gamma Dosimetry and Dose Rate Determination" Instruction for Experiment "Gamma Dosimetry and Dose Rate Determination" Content: 1 .... Motivation 2..... Theoretical Background 2.1... Properties of Ionising Radiation and Interactions of Gamma Radiation 2.2. Detection of Ionising Radiation 2.3. Quantities and Units of Dosimetry 3..... Procedure of the Experiment 3.1. Commissioning and Calibration of the Dosimeter Thermo FH40G 3.2. Commissioning and Calibration of the Dosimeter Berthold LB 133-1 3.3. Commissioning and Calibration of the Dosimeter STEP RGD 27091 3.4. Setup of the Experiment 3.4.1. Measurement of Dose Rate in Various Distances from the Radiation Source 3.4.2. Measurement of Dose Rate behind Radiation Shielding 3.5. Measurement of Dose Rate at the open Reactor Channel 4..... Evaluation of Measuring Results Figures: Fig. 1: Composition of the attenuation coefficient µ of γ-radiation in lead Fig. 2: Design of an ionisation chamber Fig. 3: Classification and legal limit values of radiation protection areas Fig. 4: Setup of the experiment (issued: January 2019) - 1 - 1. Motivation The experiment aims on familiarising with the methods of calibrating different detectors for determination of the dose and the dose rate. Furthermore, the dose rate and the activity in the vicinity of an enclosed source of ionising radiation (Cs-137) will be determined taking into account the background radiation and the measurement accuracy. Additionally, the experiment focuses on the determination of the dose rate of a shielded source as well as on the calculation of the required thickness of the shielding protection layer for meeting the permissible maximum dose rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiobiology Is a Young Science and Is Solely Concerned with the Study Of
    The Rockefeller Foundation and its support of Radiobiology up to the 1970s By Sinclair Wynchank Senior Lecturer University of Cape Town Rondebosch, South Africa [email protected] © 2011 by Sinclair Wynchank Radiation biology, or radiobiology, is a very young science, solely concerned with the study of the interactions between ionizing radiation and living matter. This science slowly became a recognized field of study after the discovery of ionizing radiation (i.e., X rays) in 1895. A broadly varied and evolving terminology has been applied to aspects of radiobiology and therefore, archival searches concerning it are complex. This report is a work in progress, which mainly recounts support given by the Rockefeller Foundation (RF) to radiobiology. The RF was a most important player in the early history of radiobiology and a crucial influence in ensuring that the science steadily matured during its first six decades. Time constraints prevented all relevant items from being accessed, but a clear idea of the RF‟s strong influence on radiobiology‟s early history has resulted. Examples of RF activities to verify this assertion are given below, in by and large chronological order. After a brief analysis of RF aid, there is a short account of why its support so strongly benefitted the young science. To my knowledge there is very little written about the history of radiobiology and nothing about the role that the RF or other philanthropic bodies played in this history. Inevitably, for an extensive time, individual radiobiologists first studied other fields of science before radiobiology. Even in 2011 there are only five universities in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Radiography
    RADIATION PROTECTION OF WORKERS Industrial Radiography RADIATION AND RADIOGRAPHS RADIOACTIVE SOURCES PROCEDURES RADIOGRAPHERS DO follow the procedures. Ionizing radiation can pen- Materials of higher den Sealed sources are small þ Safe storage Precautions þ DO use the appropriate equipment, including collimators. in size and contain material etrate objects and create sity absorb more radiation. þ DO confi rm that there are no other people working in the images on photographic The metal components are which emits penetrating area of radiography. fi lm. The technique is revealed inside this tele radiation continuously. Radioactive sources should be kept in a secure, fi re þ DO use clear working signs and signals. called radiography and phone because they have Special containers made þ DO set up the controlled area and the necessary barriers. the processed fi lms are absorbed more radiation of dense metal shielding resistant and adequately shielded storage location þ DO confi rm the location of the source, or that X rays are called radiographs. than the surrounding plastic. are necessary to store, not being generated, by use of a survey meter. when not in use, and should move and manipulate these þ DO secure and store the source or X ray machine when sources. Due to their small be kept separate from other not in use. materials. The storage loca- size and manoeuvrability, Portable and mobile radiographic þ DO wear your personal dosimeter. sealed sources can be containers. ~ tion for X ray machines that used in confined spaces. are not in use is not required to be shielded. OTHER WORKERS Iridium-192 is a common radioactive source used þ DO observe the access restrictions, however remote it may in gamma radiography.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Basics
    Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV \'- f Susana Field Laboratory .A . &at is radiation? Ra - -.. - -. - - . known as ionizing radiatios bScause it can produce charged.. particles (ions)..- in matter. .-- . 'I" . .. .. .. .- . - .- . -- . .-- - .. What is radioactivity? Radioactivity is produced by the process of radioactive atmi trying to become stable. Radiation is emitted in the process. In the United State! Radioactive radioactivity is measured in units of curies. Smaller fractions of the curie are the millicurie (111,000 curie), the microcurie (111,000,000 curie), and the picocurie (1/1,000,000 microcurie). Particle What is radioactive material? Radioactive material is any material containing unstable atoms that emit radiation. What are the four basic types of ionizing radiation? Aluminum Leadl Paper foil Concrete Adphaparticles-Alpha particles consist of two protons and two neutrons. They can travel only a few centimeters in air and can be stopped easily by a sheet of paper or by the skin's surface. Betaparticles-Beta articles are smaller and lighter than alpha particles and have the mass of a single electron. A high-energy beta particle can travel a few meters in the air. Beta particles can pass through a sheet of paper, but may be stopped by a thin sheet of aluminum foil or glass. Gamma rays-Gamma rays (and x-rays), unlike alpha or beta particles, are waves of pure energy. Gamma radiation is very penetrating and can travel several hundred feet in air. Gamma radiation requires a thick wall of concrete, lead, or steel to stop it. Neutrons-A neutron is an atomic particle that has about one-quarter the weight of an alpha particle.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Chemical Dosimeters Development Of
    SUDANSUDAN ACADEMYAGADEMY OFOF SCIENCES(SAS)SGIENGES(SAS) ATOMICATOMIC ENERGYEhTERGYRESEARCHESRESEARCHES COORDINATIONCOORDII\rATI ON COUNCILCOUNCIL - Development of Chemical Dosimeters A dissertation Submitted in a partial Fulfillment of the Requirement forfbr Diploma Degree in Nuclear Science (Chemistry) By FareedFadl Alla MersaniMergani SupervisorDr K.S.Adam MurchMarch 2006 J - - - CONTENTS Subject Page -I - DedicationDedication........ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... I Acknowledgement ... '" ... ... ... ... ... ... '" ... ... ... ... '" ... '" ....... .. 11II Abstract ... ... ... '" ... ... ... '" ... ... ... ... -..... ... ... ... ... ... ..... III -I Ch-lch-1 DosimetryDosimefry - 1-1t-l IntroductionLntroduction . 1I - 1-2t-2 Principle of Dosimetry '" '" . 2 1-3l-3 DosimetryDosimefiySystems . 3J 1-3-1l-3-l primary standard dosimeters '" . 4 - 1-3-2l-3-Z Reference standard dosimeters ... .. " . 4 1-3-3L-3-3 Transfer standard dosimeters ... ... '" . 4 1-3-4t-3-4 Routine dosimeters . 5 1-4I-4 Measurement of absorbed dose . 6 1-5l-5 Calibration of DosimetryDosimetrvsystemsvstem '" . 6 1-6l-6 Transit dose effects . 8 Ch-2ch-2 Requirements of chemical dosimeters 2-12-l Introduction ... ... ... .............................................. 111l 2-2 Developing of chemical dosimeters ... ... .. ....... ... .. ..... 12t2 2-3 Classification of Dosimetry methods.methods .......................... 14l4 2-4 RequirementsRequiremsnts of ideal chemical dosimeters ,. ... 15 2-5 Types of chemical system .
    [Show full text]