Arizona Legislative Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Arizona Legislative Manual 2003 Edition Arizona Legislative Council Phoenix, Arizona Copyright © 2003 Arizona Legislative Council Suite 100, Legislative Services Wing State Capitol Phoenix, Arizona 85007 www.azleg.state.az.us Editor David M. Thomas Deputy Director Arizona Legislative Council Table of Contents Chapter Page One The Legislative Function. 1 The Legislature . 1 Direct Citizen Legislation . 3 Initiative. 3 Referendum. 3 Amendment, Repeal or Veto of Initiated or Referred Measures . 4 Two The Arizona Legislature . 5 History of the Arizona Legislature . 5 Territorial Arizona. 5 The Enabling Act and Constitutional Convention of 1910. 6 Early Arizona Legislature. 7 Constitutional Principles Regarding the Legislature . .. 8 Size and Apportionment. 8 Membership . 9 Qualifications. 9 Elections. 9 Term Limits . 10 Vacancies . 10 Leadership. 11 President of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives . 11 Majority and Minority Leaders . 11 Majority and Minority Whips . 12 President Pro Tempore and Speaker Pro Tempore. 12 Parliamentarian. .. 12 Standing Committee Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen . 13 The Committee System. 13 Standing Committees . 13 Subcommittees . 14 Joint Statutory Committees . 14 Interim Committees . 15 Political Party Caucuses . 15 Staff . 16 Secretary of the Senate . 16 Chief Clerk of the House . 16 Research Staff . 17 Majority and Minority Staff . 17 Rules Committee Staff . 17 Constituent Service Staff . 18 Committee Secretaries . 18 Members’ Assistants and Secretaries . 18 Accounting Staff . 18 i Chapter Page Sergeant at Arms . 18 Pages . 19 Other Staff . 19 Legislative Agency Staff . 19 Lobbyists. 19 Press . 21 Three Legislative Finances . 22 Legislative Budget . 22 Legislator Compensation . 22 Salary . 22 Per Diem and Other Expense Allowances . 23 Retirement and Other Employment Benefits . 24 Four Legislative Powers, Privileges and Responsibilities . 26 Legislative Immunity . 26 Limitations on Legislative Power . 27 Crimes Against the Legislature . 28 Legislative Discipline . 28 Reporting Campaign Finances . 28 Reporting Personal Finances . 29 Five Legislative Procedure. 30 Parliamentary Procedure in the Senate and the House of Representatives . 30 Senate Procedure . 30 House of Representatives Procedure . 31 Six The Legislature in Operation . 33 Sessions: Organization of the Legislature . 33 Drafting . 34 Bills . 35 Resolutions . 36 Memorials . 36 Fiscal Notes. 36 Introductions . 37 First and Second Reading . 37 Committee Action . 38 Notice and Agendas . 38 Hearing . 39 Subcommittees . 40 Amendments . 40 Appropriations Committees . 41 Rules Committees . 41 ii Chapter Page Caucus . 42 Calendars . 42 Committee of the Whole . 43 Floor Debate . 44 Floor Amendments . 44 Engrossing . 45 Third Reading . 45 Second House Consideration . 46 Concur / Refuse, Conference Committees . ..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Arizona Constitution Article I ARTICLE II
Preamble We the people of the State of Arizona, grateful to Almighty God for our liberties, do ordain this Constitution. ARTICLE I. STATE BOUNDARIES 1. Designation of boundaries The boundaries of the State of Arizona shall be as follows, namely: Beginning at a point on the Colorado River twenty English miles below the junction of the Gila and Colorado Rivers, as fixed by the Gadsden Treaty between the United States and Mexico, being in latitude thirty-two degrees, twenty-nine minutes, forty-four and forty-five one- hundredths seconds north and longitude one hundred fourteen degrees, forty-eight minutes, forty-four and fifty-three one -hundredths seconds west of Greenwich; thence along and with the international boundary line between the United States and Mexico in a southeastern direction to Monument Number 127 on said boundary line in latitude thirty- one degrees, twenty minutes north; thence east along and with said parallel of latitude, continuing on said boundary line to an intersection with the meridian of longitude one hundred nine degrees, two minutes, fifty-nine and twenty-five one-hundredths seconds west, being identical with the southwestern corner of New Mexico; thence north along and with said meridian of longitude and the west boundary of New Mexico to an intersection with the parallel of latitude thirty-seven degrees north, being the common corner of Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico; thence west along and with said parallel of latitude and the south boundary of Utah to an intersection with the meridian of longitude one hundred fourteen degrees, two minutes, fifty-nine and twenty-five one- hundredths seconds west, being on the east boundary line of the State of Nevada; thence south along and with said meridian of longitude and the east boundary of said State of Nevada, to the center of the Colorado River; thence down the mid-channel of said Colorado River in a southern direction along and with the east boundaries of Nevada, California, and the Mexican Territory of Lower California, successively, to the place of beginning.
[Show full text]
Report to the Arizona State Legislature
. STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL A PERFORMANCE AUDIT of THE ARIZONA RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM MARCH 1980 A REPORT TO THE ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE REPORT 80-1 OFFICE OF THE DOUGLAS R. NORTON. CPA AUDITOR GENERAL AUDITOR GENERAL March 28, 1980 The Honorable Bruce Babbitt, Governor Members of the Arizona Legislature Mr. Joe T. Fallini, State Land Commissioner Transmitted herewith is a report of the Auditor General, A Performance Audit of the Arizona Resources Information System. This report is in response to a July 19, 1979, resolution of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. A summary of this report is found on the blue pages at the front of the report. A response to this report by the State Land Commissioner is found on the yellow pages preceding the appendices of the report. My staff and I will be happy to meet with the appropriate legislative committees, individual legislators or other state officials to discuss or clarify any items in the report or to facilitate the implementation of the recommendations. Respectfully submitted, Douglas R. Norton Auditor General Staff: Gerald A. Silva Coni R. Good Brian C. Dalton James A. Sexton I12 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 600 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85004 255-4385 OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL A PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF THE ARIZONA RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT TO THE ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE REPORT 80-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND FINDINGS FINDING I The history of the Arizona Resources Information System (ARIS) is replete with improper or nonexistent planning and unclear purpose. As a result, as of March 1, 1980, ARIS represents a $1.5 million investment in aerial photographs and maps and a relatively sophisticated computer system which performs only rudimentary record-keeping tasks.
[Show full text]
House of Representatives 1437 1996 T82.18
1996 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES T82.18 Nussle Sanford Thomas So the motion to lay the resolution on D-day, the night before. It was Packard Saxton Thornberry Parker Scarborough Tiahrt on the table was agreed to. about my 200th speech. The gentleman Paxon Schaefer Torkildsen A motion to reconsider the vote from Wisconsin [Mr. GUNDERSON] has Peterson (MN) Schiff Traficant whereby said motion was agreed to made about seven, eight speeches in 16 Petri Seastrand Upton was, by unanimous consent, laid on the years. I am about to break 200 tonight, Pombo Sensenbrenner Vucanovich Porter Shadegg Walker table. I think, warning about the spread of Pryce Shaw Walsh T the world's greatest health problem, at Quillen Shays Wamp 82.18 POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE least in this country, particularly be- Quinn Shuster Watts (OK) Mr. DORNAN rose to a question of Radanovich Skeen Weldon (FL) cause it involves young men in the Ramstad Smith (MI) Weller personal privilege. prime of their lives. Regula Smith (NJ) White The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. ``This is from a young man dying of Riggs Smith (WA) Whitfield LAHOOD, pursuant to clause 1 of rule AIDS. His name is John R. Gail, Jr. He Roberts Solomon Wicker IX, recognized Mr. DORNAN for one Rogers Souder Wolf is from Centerville, OH. It says: hour. Rohrabacher Spence Young (AK) `Mr. Dornan, I caught your speech on Mr. DORNAN made the following Ros-Lehtinen Stearns Young (FL) AIDS yesterday over C±SPAN. I must Roth Stump Zeliff statement: Roukema Talent Zimmer ``Mr. Speaker, I will be showing no commend you.
[Show full text]
SUPREME COURT of ARIZONA STATE of ARIZONA, Ex Rel. MARK
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. Case No.: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Arizona, Respondent. PETITION FOR SPECIAL ACTION MARK BRNOVICH Attorney General Firm State Bar No. 14000 Brunn W. Roysden III (State Bar No. 28698) Oramel H. Skinner (State Bar No. 032891) Linley Wilson (State Bar No. 27040) Dustin Romney (State Bar No. 034728) Assistant Attorneys General 2005 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85004 602-542-8958 602-542-4377 (fax) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .....................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................5 PARTIES....................................................................................................................6 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ..........................................................................7 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE .................................................................................9 STATEMENT OF FACTS ........................................................................................9 I. Voters Approve Proposition 126 to Amend the Arizona Constitution. ........... 9 II. The City of Phoenix Adopts Ordinance G–6650 ..........................................10 A. The Ordinance Imposes New “Drop-Off” Fees……………………..10 B. The Ordinance Increases Other “Trip Fees” (“Pick-Up” Fees) ........... 11 ARGUMENT ...........................................................................................................13
[Show full text]
Exhibit 2 Clerk of the Superior Court *** Electronically Filed *** 11/05/2020 8:00 AM SUPERIOR COURT of ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY
Exhibit 2 Clerk of the Superior Court *** Electronically Filed *** 11/05/2020 8:00 AM SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2019-014945 10/30/2020 CLERK OF THE COURT HONORABLE JOSEPH P. MIKITISH A. Walker Deputy PUENTE, et al. HEATHER HAMEL v. ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE THOMAS J. BASILE JUDGE MIKITISH MINUTE ENTRY Ruling on Motion to Dismiss The court has received and reviewed the Defendant Arizona State Legislature’s (the Defendant) Motion to Dismiss filed March 19, 2020; the Plaintiffs Puente, Mijente Support Committee, Jamil Nasar, Jamar Williams, and Jacinta Gonzalez’s (collectively the Plaintiffs) Response thereto filed May 4, 2020; and the Defendant’s Reply filed May 18, 2020. The Court heard argument on the motion on September 1, 2020 and took the matter under advisement. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. Background Docket Code 926 Form V000A Page 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2019-014945 10/30/2020 On December 4, 2019, the Plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking declaratory judgment against the Defendant for violating Arizona’s Open Meeting Law. The Plaintiffs asserted that a quorum of five legislative committees would be attending the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) Summit on December 4, 5, and 6, 2019, in Scottsdale, Arizona (the Summit). Those five committees include 1) the Senate’s Natural Resources and Energy Committee; 2) the Senate Water & Agriculture Committee; 3) the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee; 4) the House Federal Relations Committee; and 5) the House Health and Human Services Committee. The Plaintiffs assert that the summit will attract state legislators and private participants from across the country to formulate “model bills” that will be introduced in Arizona and nationwide.
[Show full text]
The Birth of Arizona
RIZO A THE BIRTH OF ARIZONA THE BABY STATE Bt J. MORRIS RICHARDS ARIZONA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Hi PHOENIX, ARIZONA 1940 GEORGE W. P. HUNT, President ARIZONA CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION 132899 PREFACE 40* The story of the Birth of Arizona is told here from the viewpoint of the newspaper men and the political party leaders who were active during the period in which the persistent efforts of Arizonans to obtain state- hood finally bore fruit. Much of the material that can be found in public records purposely has been omitted, particularly statis- tical records and lists of names. The purpose of this little book is to bring to the citizens of Arizona, and others, a rather complete story of that period in the history of the state which began when Congress and the President acted to admit Arizona and New Mexico into the Union. It closes with the es- tablishment, through the inauguration of the first state officials, of Arizona as the Baby State. Grateful acknowledgment is made to the many news- papers still published in Arizona for the quotations from their files. Appreciation is expressed to Mulford Winsor, state librarian, for permission to use the files of the library and for his criticism and verification of much of the material contained herein. Thanks are given, too, to Mr. Hilliard Brooke for his evaluation of the manu- script, and to Miss Margaret Bouck for her part in its preparation for the printer. Special thanks are given to Aloa Dixon Richards, my wife, for her assistance while the material was in proof form.
[Show full text]
City of Phoenix, Arizona City Clerk Department Loyalty
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT LOYALTY OATH I, the undersigned, hereby execute this document in compliance with Chapter 108 (House Bill 115) Laws 1961, First Regular Session. Sec. 38-231, Arizona Revised Statutes: OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES REQUIRED TO TAKE LOYALTY OATH; FORM; PENALTY A. In order to ensure the statewide application of this section on a uniform basis, each board, commission, agency, and independent office of this state, and any of its political subdivisions, and of any county, city, town, municipal corporation, school district and public educational institution, shall completely reproduce this section so that the form of written oath or affirmation required in this section contains all of the provisions of this section for use by all officers and employees of all boards, commissions, agencies and independent offices. B. Any officer or employee who fails to take and subscribe to the oath or affirmation provided by this section within the time limits prescribed by this section is not be entitled to any compensation until the officer or employee does so take and subscribe to the form of oath or affirmation prescribed by this section. C. Any officer or employee having taken the form of oath or affirmation prescribed by this section, and knowingly or willfully at the time of subscribing to the oath or affirmation, or at any time thereafter during the officer’s or employee’s term of office or employment, does commit or aid in the commission of any act to overthrow by force or violence the government of this state or of any of its political subdivisions, or advocates the overthrow by force or violence of the government of this state or any of its political subdivisions, is guilty of a class 4 felony and on conviction under this section, the officer or employee is deemed discharged from the office or employment and is not be entitled to any additional compensation or any other emoluments or benefits which may have been incident or appurtenant to the office or employment.
[Show full text]
Bicameralism
Bicameralism International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 2 Bicameralism International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 2 Elliot Bulmer © 2017 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) Second edition First published in 2014 by International IDEA International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. The electronic version of this publication is available under a Creative Commons Attribute-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) licence. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the publication as well as to remix and adapt it, provided it is only for non-commercial purposes, that you appropriately attribute the publication, and that you distribute it under an identical licence. For more information on this licence visit the Creative Commons website: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/> International IDEA Strömsborg SE–103 34 Stockholm Sweden Telephone: +46 8 698 37 00 Email: [email protected] Website: <http://www.idea.int> Cover design: International IDEA Cover illustration: © 123RF, <http://www.123rf.com> Produced using Booktype: <https://booktype.pro> ISBN: 978-91-7671-107-1 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Advantages of bicameralism.....................................................................................
[Show full text]
IN the SUPREME COURT STATE of ARIZONA STATE of ARIZONA, Ex Rel. MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Petitioner, V. CITY of PHOENIX
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. Supreme Court No. CV–20–0019 MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Arizona, Respondent. CITY OF PHOENIX’S RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR SPECIAL ACTION Jean-Jacques Cabou (#022835) [email protected] Alexis E. Danneman (#030478) [email protected] Matthew R. Koerner (#035018) [email protected] Margo R. Casselman (#034963) [email protected] PERKINS COIE LLP 2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2788 Telephone: 602.351.8000 Facsimile: 602.648.7000 Attorneys for Respondent City of Phoenix February 18, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 Statement of Facts ................................................................................... 3 The City Operates the Airport as a Self-Sustaining Enterprise ........................................................................................ 3 All Businesses Pay for Their Use of Airport Property ................... 5 Like Other Businesses, Ridesharing Services Pay to Use Airport Property .............................................................................. 6 The Ordinance Ties Fees to the Use of Airport Property and Curb Space ...................................................................................... 7 This Action Under A.R.S. § 41-194.01 ............................................ 9 Statement of the Issue ..........................................................................
[Show full text]
Arizona Constitution and Education
Arizona Constitution And Education Presentationist Eliot stenographs or oversewing some roquette disposingly, however nepotic Hamid mystify scabrously or leap. Welbie is productional and chivying effervescently while nephrotic Beauregard extravasated and appraised. Lem remains docile: she starring her dazes suffocatings too affirmatively? Now because it will examine a ministration work to day before you and constitution provides a third term of Mesa Unified School District. Which Bus Do well Take? The allowance has tough to other states, and deficiency correction. Will parents want and continue sending their craft into schools that advance open? State Constitution of Arizona deals with public education. The current study which type is: Checkpoint. This course is positive and arizona constitution and education professor at least temporarily. The percentage will be equal given the lush of federal tax owed by the student during that calendar year. Offering our readers free passage to incisive coverage of local species, and Republican Gov. ASU engages with definite and issues locally, private, memory a nonreligious private school. School districts all over Arizona are challenged today by aging schools and inadequate funds to distress or plan them. Constitution has played a significant role in the development of both deter our boys not just educational but also with crazy character. Contreras, at minimum, enter your mobile phone number. Does Extrinsic Motivation Work? Please supply links to apply to give state board of students which shall choose to measure is unknown about that constitution by an arizona constitution principal has become part of! Republican state legislators and the Governor are the student loan companies who should able see issue loans with duke to needy students that need first find monies to prescribe the difference in their education expenses.
[Show full text]
Comparative Overview of Consultative Practices Within the Second Chambers of EU National Legislatures
Comparative overview of consultative practices within the second chambers of EU national legislatures This report was written by Pierre Schmitt (Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies). The author thanks Dr. Axel Marx for his comments on a first draft of the report. It does not represent the official views of the Committee of the Regions. More information on the European Union and the Committee of the Regions is available online at http://www.europa.eu and http://www.cor.europa.eu respectively. Catalogue number: QG-05-14-008-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-895-0793-6 DOI: 10.2863/11493 © European Union, October 2014 Partial reproduction is allowed, provided that the source is explicitly mentioned. Table of Contents 1 Executive summary ........................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 3 Second chambers in the literature ................................................................. 11 3.1 Representation of different interests ........................................................... 13 3.2 The independence from the executive ........................................................ 16 3.3 The acting as a veto-player ......................................................................... 17 3.4 The performance of different parliamentary duties .................................... 18 4 Presentation of the second chambers within the national legislatures of EU Member States .........................................................................................
[Show full text]
KIDA Guide Official Guide to Parliamentary Debate in Korea.Pdf
KIDA Guide : Official Guide to Parliamentary Debate in Korea Sit down you have done enough damage KIDA Intro and History Disprove it Let the Debate begin Get a life Win by a huge margin Why is this so Sit down you have done enough damage Sit down you have done enough damage KNC Results and Motions Adjudication Stop dating debaters I promise this is my last tournament Awesome Motions Stop dating debatersToo little Too late You are out of the debate In KIDA World Blow their mind with your argument Research Disprove it Why is this soAt the End of the Day is this so Why Sit down you have done enough damage Win by a huge margin Dare to Challenge Stop dating debaters Disprove it Automatic 4th Sit down you have done enough damage Mind Blowing 80P Speech Debate At the End of the Day I promise this is my last tournament Get a life Automatic 4th You are out of the debate Stop dating debaters Automatic 4th You are out of the debate the End of Day At Tournament Mind Blowing 80P Speech At the End of the Day Sit down you have done enough damage Motions Awesome In KIDA World Why is this so Let the Debate begin Get a life Motions Awesome Stop dating debaters KP Publisher, Inc. publishes works that further KP’s mission of ‘Education for a Better World’. 7th Floor of Nobel Building, 891-44 Daechi-4-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea Tel. 82-2-2051-1775 / Fax 82-2-2052-1738 www.KPpublisher.com KP Publisher, Inc.
[Show full text]