THE OFFICE and POWERS of the GOVERNOR of ARIZONA by Joel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE OFFICE and POWERS of the GOVERNOR of ARIZONA by Joel The office and powers of the governor of Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Dickinson, Joel Ray Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 08:22:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551822 THE OFFICE AND POWERS OF THE GOVERNOR OF ARIZONA by Joel Ray Dickinson A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 6 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: Q D. A. BINGHAM / 'Date Associate Professor of Government and Public Administration ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have been much aided by others— to "whom I want to make acknowledgment here. My major professor, Dr. David A. Bingham, encouraged and aided the effort throughout. His suggestions and corrections, as well as his guidance in locating and evaluating research material, have been invaluable to the study. A special appreciation goes to the following: John M. McGowan, Administrative Assistant to Governor Paul Fannin; Paul Fannin, Governor of Arizona, 1958 to 1964; and numerous members of the Arizona state legislature. I am indebted to the Special Collections Division of the University of Arizona Library and the Arizona State Library and Archives for research materials and study facilities which, without their kind assistance, would have proved difficult to obtain. I would like to express my thanks to all those who made it possible for me to conduct this study, especially to the Bureau of Business and Public Research at the University of Arizona, which extended me an assistantship during part of my study, and to my parents, Mr. and Mrs. Lawrence C. Dickinson. Lastly, a note of gratitude to my wife for her consideration, constant encouragement, and editing assistance. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1 The Problem ............. ............ .. 1 Statement of the problem ........................... 1 II. A “MODEL” EXECUTIVE BRANCH.............................. 9 Public Opinion and Administrative Reorganization in Arizona ........................................... 13 The period of 1 9 2 1 ...................................13 The period of 1930-1933 ................ 18 The period of 1 9 ^ 1 ...................................24 The period of 1950-1953 .......................... 2? The Constructed "Model"............................. 36 Principles of administrative organization ..... 36 Term of office ........................ ...... 38 Time of election .................. 4l The executive p o w e r s .................... 42 The legislative powers ............... 51 H I . THE LEGAL-POLITICAL POWERS AID OFFICE OF THE G O V E R N O R ....................................... 53 The Legal Powers................... 53 Constitutional powers ....... .............. 53 Statutory po w e r s .....................................70 iv CHAPTER PAGE The Political-Traditional Powers .......... ..... 88 Development and Adequacy of the Governor’s Staff ............................................ 101 IV. THE ARIZONA EXPERIENCE: POWERS AND CONTROLS ...... 110 The Executive Powers in Practice ........... 110 The budgetary p o w e r s ...............................110 Appointing and removal powers: The short ballot concept ................ 114 Term and election ...................... ..... 119 The Legislative Powers in Practice .......... 120 The veto and item veto ........................ 120 The recommending or message power . ............. 124 The special session p o w e r ...........................129 Controlling the Strengthened Governor ................. 134 Impeachment .................................. 135 The recall .... .............. ........ 136 Popular election ................................ 137 Legislative oversight ....... .......... .. 139 V. ADMINISTRATIVE REORGANIZATION AND THE FU T U R E ............ l4l Arguments against Reorganization ................ 143 Some Guidelines for the Future .............. 149 vi CHAPTER PAGE APPENDIXES.................................................... 153 APPENDIX A. Text of Governor's Statutory Civil Defense Powers .................. 153 APPENDIX B. Arizona State Government and Administration C h a r t .......................................... 161 APPENDIX C. Griffenhagen*s Reorganization Proposals— Arizona ............ 162 BIBLIOGRAPHY.................................................. 163 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE I. Governor*s Staff Positions and the Numbers of Personnel Assigned to Each, at Ten-Year Intervals During the Base Period 1911-1912 to I96O-I96I ..................... 103 vii ABSTRACT This thesis first constructs a “model" state executive branch that serves as a reference for the reader as he moves through the study. The source materials from "which this model is shaped include the most promising and challenging of the administrative reorganization principles and concepts that have been set forth in myriad publications and the view adopted by the average member of the Arizona polity with respect to the functions and responsibilities of the governor and his adminis­ tration. The governor's legal, political, and traditional powers are set forth, and the historical development and present adequacy of the governor's immediate office staff is studied. The thesis then indicates the weaknesses in the governor's budget and appointing-removal powers and compares the chief executive's powers in other areas with the constructed model. Methods for controlling the strengthened governor are discussed, along with proposals for increasing the authority and efficiency of the Arizona legislature. The study concludes with the assumption that the model represents the desired ends that the state's executive machinery should achieve and indicates that administrative reforms have been challenged and continue to be challenged by strong critical argument. Some guidelines to aid reorganization sponsors in achieving their goals are included. viii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The organization of the state executive branch and, more specifically, the office of the governor and his powers have been the subject of widespread, extensive studies and analyses throughout the United States. The fertile field of Arizona politics and government has afforded the student of political science an excellent opportunity for research in this extremely important area. The present study is intended to be a contribution to the knowledge of those in Arizona who seek to understand better the fascinating subject of their state government. I. THE PROBLEM Statement of the Problem The proponents of administrative reorganization have maintained since the early 1900*s that the chief executives of American states are handicapped in their attempts to perform their duties as elected public servants by inadequate powers and inefficient administrative organization. No state has escaped the constructive criticisms and suggestions put forth by these reformers. Some states have responded by revamping, either in part or completely, their executive branches in accordance with the reorganization principles which promise a sounder, more efficient execution of the functions of the modern 1 2 state government. Others have not. Arizona is a member of the latter group having experienced no major change in its executive machinery since the achievement of statehood in 1912. That a continued effort will be made to obtain some measure of administrative reorganization in Arizona government is indicated by this observation from Dr. Robert E. Riggs, Research Associate of the Bureau of Business and Public Research of the University of Arizona: What is the future of administrative reorganization in Arizona? It is not currently a major issue, nor has it been since 195^• On the basis of past experience, however, one can safely predict that reorganization will come again to prominence in Arizona politics— possibly within five years, almost certainly within the decade. The basic condition of governmental expansion and proliferation which gave substance to demands for reorganiza­ tion in the past has continued its inexorable march. Such growth cannot be ignored. It does not guarantee that reorganization will take place but it does guarantee periodic outbursts of demand for reorganization, as well as almost constant piecemeal efforts to accommodate the growth pressures.^ This movement is based
Recommended publications
  • Southern Arizona, United States of America
    Southern Arizona, United States of America 2 – ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Assessment and recommendations Southern Arizona region: from a resource-based economy to a knowledge-based economy Southern Arizona is the southern-most part of the state of Arizona in the United States. bordering the Mexican state of Sonora, with a multi-cultural heritage and a major gateway for trade with Mexico. The vast desert region consists of Pima County, Cochise County and Santa Cruz County, and has a population of approximately 1.2 million, accounting for 18% of the state population. The engine of the region’s development is the Tucson metropolitan area, the second largest metropolitan area in the state, just behind the Phoenix metropolitan area. About 23% of the land in Southern Arizona is owned by Native Americans, Tohono O’odham and Pascua Yaqui Nations, who continue to feature low education, labour market and health outcomes. Population growth is a major strength in the region, an opportunity for many industry sectors, but at the same time it poses cultural, economic and political challenges. Since World War II, Arizona has had one of the fastest growing populations in the United States. Between 1990 and 2000, Arizona experienced a 40.0% population increase which slowed down to 26.7% between 2000 and 2008. In Southern Arizona, the corresponding figures were 26.0% and 18.4%. Arizona has the fastest growing Hispanic population in the US, comprising about 25% of the state population and 27% of that of Southern Arizona. In Tucson, 40% of the residents identify themselves as Hispanic, while in Santa Cruz the majority of population are Hispanic.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Constitution Article I ARTICLE II
    Preamble We the people of the State of Arizona, grateful to Almighty God for our liberties, do ordain this Constitution. ARTICLE I. STATE BOUNDARIES 1. Designation of boundaries The boundaries of the State of Arizona shall be as follows, namely: Beginning at a point on the Colorado River twenty English miles below the junction of the Gila and Colorado Rivers, as fixed by the Gadsden Treaty between the United States and Mexico, being in latitude thirty-two degrees, twenty-nine minutes, forty-four and forty-five one- hundredths seconds north and longitude one hundred fourteen degrees, forty-eight minutes, forty-four and fifty-three one -hundredths seconds west of Greenwich; thence along and with the international boundary line between the United States and Mexico in a southeastern direction to Monument Number 127 on said boundary line in latitude thirty- one degrees, twenty minutes north; thence east along and with said parallel of latitude, continuing on said boundary line to an intersection with the meridian of longitude one hundred nine degrees, two minutes, fifty-nine and twenty-five one-hundredths seconds west, being identical with the southwestern corner of New Mexico; thence north along and with said meridian of longitude and the west boundary of New Mexico to an intersection with the parallel of latitude thirty-seven degrees north, being the common corner of Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico; thence west along and with said parallel of latitude and the south boundary of Utah to an intersection with the meridian of longitude one hundred fourteen degrees, two minutes, fifty-nine and twenty-five one- hundredths seconds west, being on the east boundary line of the State of Nevada; thence south along and with said meridian of longitude and the east boundary of said State of Nevada, to the center of the Colorado River; thence down the mid-channel of said Colorado River in a southern direction along and with the east boundaries of Nevada, California, and the Mexican Territory of Lower California, successively, to the place of beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Arizona State Legislature
    . STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL A PERFORMANCE AUDIT of THE ARIZONA RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM MARCH 1980 A REPORT TO THE ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE REPORT 80-1 OFFICE OF THE DOUGLAS R. NORTON. CPA AUDITOR GENERAL AUDITOR GENERAL March 28, 1980 The Honorable Bruce Babbitt, Governor Members of the Arizona Legislature Mr. Joe T. Fallini, State Land Commissioner Transmitted herewith is a report of the Auditor General, A Performance Audit of the Arizona Resources Information System. This report is in response to a July 19, 1979, resolution of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. A summary of this report is found on the blue pages at the front of the report. A response to this report by the State Land Commissioner is found on the yellow pages preceding the appendices of the report. My staff and I will be happy to meet with the appropriate legislative committees, individual legislators or other state officials to discuss or clarify any items in the report or to facilitate the implementation of the recommendations. Respectfully submitted, Douglas R. Norton Auditor General Staff: Gerald A. Silva Coni R. Good Brian C. Dalton James A. Sexton I12 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 600 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85004 255-4385 OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL A PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF THE ARIZONA RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT TO THE ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE REPORT 80-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND FINDINGS FINDING I The history of the Arizona Resources Information System (ARIS) is replete with improper or nonexistent planning and unclear purpose. As a result, as of March 1, 1980, ARIS represents a $1.5 million investment in aerial photographs and maps and a relatively sophisticated computer system which performs only rudimentary record-keeping tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona 2018 General Election Publicity Pamphlet
    ARIZONA 2018 GENERAL ELECTION PUBLICITY PAMPHLET NOVEMBER 6, 2018 NOVEMBER 6, 2018 GENERAL ELECTION TABLE OF Contents General Voting Information A Message to Voters from Secretary of State Michele Reagan .................................................................................. 4 Voter Registration Information .................................................................................................................................. 5 Online Voter Services ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Vote by Mail and In Person Early Voting ................................................................................................................... 6 Military and Overseas Voters ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Voter Accessibility ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Alternative Pamphlet Formats.................................................................................................................................... 7 Polling Place/Vote Center Information ...................................................................................................................... 8 ID at the Polls – Bring It! ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AVAILABLE from Arizona State Capitol Museum. Teacher
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 429 853 SO 029 147 TITLE Arizona State Capitol Museum. Teacher Resource Guide. Revised Edition. INSTITUTION Arizona State Dept. of Library, Archives and Public Records, Phoenix. PUB DATE 1996-00-00 NOTE 71p. AVAILABLE FROM Arizona State Department of Library, Archives, and Public Records--Museum Division, 1700 W. Washington, Phoenix, AZ 85007. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Elementary Secondary Education; Field Trips; Instructional Materials; Learning Activities; *Local History; *Museums; Social Studies; *State History IDENTIFIERS *Arizona (Phoenix); State Capitals ABSTRACT Information about Arizona's history, government, and state capitol is organized into two sections. The first section presents atimeline of Arizona history from the prehistoric era to 1992. Brief descriptions of the state's entrance into the Union and the city of Phoenix as theselection for the State Capitol are discussed. Details are given about the actualsite of the State Capitol and the building itself. The second section analyzes the government of Arizona by giving an explanation of the executive branch, a list of Arizona state governors, and descriptions of the functions of its legislative and judicial branches of government. Both sections include illustrations or maps and reproducible student quizzes with answer sheets. Student activity worksheets and a bibliography are provided. Although designed to accompany student field trips to the Arizona State Capitol Museum, the resource guide and activities
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of WELLIAMS, ARIZONA 1876-1951 James R. Fuchs A
    A history of Williams, Arizona, 1876-1951 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Fuchs, James R. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 09/10/2021 06:46:33 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551188 A HISTORY OF WELLIAMS, ARIZONA 1876-1951 James R. Fuchs A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Graduate College, University of Arizona 1952 3 - % TAB IE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.......................... ill TABLE OF MAPS.................................. lv INTRODUCTION .................................. v Chapter I. NORTHERN ARIZONA, 1540-1870.............. 1 II. PIONEERS IN THE WILLIAMS AREA, 1869-1881 . 25 III. CHARLES T. ROGERS AND THE WILLIAMS TOWNSITE................................. 38 IV. FORMATIVE YEARS, 1881-1890 .............. 56 V. GROWING PAINS, 1891-1900 ................ 104 VI. COMING OF AGE, 1901-1910.................. 154 VII. ERA OF CIVIC IMPROVEMENT, 1911-1930. 206 VIII. RECENT PROGRESS, 1931-1951.............. 259 IX. GATEWAY TO THE GRAND CANYON(CONCLUSION) . 296 APPENDICES......................................... 304 BIBLIOGRAPHY....................................... 312 22321S LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Follows Page 1 1.-.' John Clark............ .......................... 28 Charles Thomas Rogers, 1827-1905. 58 Gurley Street- Prescott, Showing Rogers' Market . 40 Frank Lansing'Rogers in 1876. ., . ..... 45 Williams in 1882 (Looking West) . 55- First Bridge in Johnson Canyon, At Simms Tunnel . 58 Completed Bridge in Johnson Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of ARIZONA STATE of ARIZONA, Ex Rel. MARK
    SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. Case No.: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Arizona, Respondent. PETITION FOR SPECIAL ACTION MARK BRNOVICH Attorney General Firm State Bar No. 14000 Brunn W. Roysden III (State Bar No. 28698) Oramel H. Skinner (State Bar No. 032891) Linley Wilson (State Bar No. 27040) Dustin Romney (State Bar No. 034728) Assistant Attorneys General 2005 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85004 602-542-8958 602-542-4377 (fax) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .....................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................5 PARTIES....................................................................................................................6 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ..........................................................................7 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE .................................................................................9 STATEMENT OF FACTS ........................................................................................9 I. Voters Approve Proposition 126 to Amend the Arizona Constitution. ........... 9 II. The City of Phoenix Adopts Ordinance G–6650 ..........................................10 A. The Ordinance Imposes New “Drop-Off” Fees……………………..10 B. The Ordinance Increases Other “Trip Fees” (“Pick-Up” Fees) ........... 11 ARGUMENT ...........................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 2 Clerk of the Superior Court *** Electronically Filed *** 11/05/2020 8:00 AM SUPERIOR COURT of ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY
    Exhibit 2 Clerk of the Superior Court *** Electronically Filed *** 11/05/2020 8:00 AM SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2019-014945 10/30/2020 CLERK OF THE COURT HONORABLE JOSEPH P. MIKITISH A. Walker Deputy PUENTE, et al. HEATHER HAMEL v. ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE THOMAS J. BASILE JUDGE MIKITISH MINUTE ENTRY Ruling on Motion to Dismiss The court has received and reviewed the Defendant Arizona State Legislature’s (the Defendant) Motion to Dismiss filed March 19, 2020; the Plaintiffs Puente, Mijente Support Committee, Jamil Nasar, Jamar Williams, and Jacinta Gonzalez’s (collectively the Plaintiffs) Response thereto filed May 4, 2020; and the Defendant’s Reply filed May 18, 2020. The Court heard argument on the motion on September 1, 2020 and took the matter under advisement. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. Background Docket Code 926 Form V000A Page 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2019-014945 10/30/2020 On December 4, 2019, the Plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking declaratory judgment against the Defendant for violating Arizona’s Open Meeting Law. The Plaintiffs asserted that a quorum of five legislative committees would be attending the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) Summit on December 4, 5, and 6, 2019, in Scottsdale, Arizona (the Summit). Those five committees include 1) the Senate’s Natural Resources and Energy Committee; 2) the Senate Water & Agriculture Committee; 3) the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee; 4) the House Federal Relations Committee; and 5) the House Health and Human Services Committee. The Plaintiffs assert that the summit will attract state legislators and private participants from across the country to formulate “model bills” that will be introduced in Arizona and nationwide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Arizona
    RIZO A THE BIRTH OF ARIZONA THE BABY STATE Bt J. MORRIS RICHARDS ARIZONA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Hi PHOENIX, ARIZONA 1940 GEORGE W. P. HUNT, President ARIZONA CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION 132899 PREFACE 40* The story of the Birth of Arizona is told here from the viewpoint of the newspaper men and the political party leaders who were active during the period in which the persistent efforts of Arizonans to obtain state- hood finally bore fruit. Much of the material that can be found in public records purposely has been omitted, particularly statis- tical records and lists of names. The purpose of this little book is to bring to the citizens of Arizona, and others, a rather complete story of that period in the history of the state which began when Congress and the President acted to admit Arizona and New Mexico into the Union. It closes with the es- tablishment, through the inauguration of the first state officials, of Arizona as the Baby State. Grateful acknowledgment is made to the many news- papers still published in Arizona for the quotations from their files. Appreciation is expressed to Mulford Winsor, state librarian, for permission to use the files of the library and for his criticism and verification of much of the material contained herein. Thanks are given, too, to Mr. Hilliard Brooke for his evaluation of the manu- script, and to Miss Margaret Bouck for her part in its preparation for the printer. Special thanks are given to Aloa Dixon Richards, my wife, for her assistance while the material was in proof form.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Phoenix, Arizona City Clerk Department Loyalty
    CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT LOYALTY OATH I, the undersigned, hereby execute this document in compliance with Chapter 108 (House Bill 115) Laws 1961, First Regular Session. Sec. 38-231, Arizona Revised Statutes: OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES REQUIRED TO TAKE LOYALTY OATH; FORM; PENALTY A. In order to ensure the statewide application of this section on a uniform basis, each board, commission, agency, and independent office of this state, and any of its political subdivisions, and of any county, city, town, municipal corporation, school district and public educational institution, shall completely reproduce this section so that the form of written oath or affirmation required in this section contains all of the provisions of this section for use by all officers and employees of all boards, commissions, agencies and independent offices. B. Any officer or employee who fails to take and subscribe to the oath or affirmation provided by this section within the time limits prescribed by this section is not be entitled to any compensation until the officer or employee does so take and subscribe to the form of oath or affirmation prescribed by this section. C. Any officer or employee having taken the form of oath or affirmation prescribed by this section, and knowingly or willfully at the time of subscribing to the oath or affirmation, or at any time thereafter during the officer’s or employee’s term of office or employment, does commit or aid in the commission of any act to overthrow by force or violence the government of this state or of any of its political subdivisions, or advocates the overthrow by force or violence of the government of this state or any of its political subdivisions, is guilty of a class 4 felony and on conviction under this section, the officer or employee is deemed discharged from the office or employment and is not be entitled to any additional compensation or any other emoluments or benefits which may have been incident or appurtenant to the office or employment.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Arizona the Executive Budget
    State of Arizona The Executive Budget STATE AGENCY BUDGETS FISCAL YEAR 2016 Douglas A. Ducey GOVERNOR JANUARY 2015 Table of Contents Introduction Financial Institutions, State Department of ........................... 154 Fingerprinting, Board of................................................................. 160 Budget in a Flash ................................................................................. 1 Fire, Building and Life Safety, Department of ....................... 162 Assumptions & Methodology ....................................................... 2 Forester, Arizona State ................................................................... 165 Agency Operating Budget Detail Funeral Directors and Embalmers, State Board of .............. 168 Game and Fish Department ......................................................... 170 Accountancy, State Board of .......................................................... 5 Gaming, Department of ................................................................. 175 Acupuncture Board of Examiners ................................................. 8 Geological Survey, Arizona ........................................................... 179 Administration, Arizona Department of ................................. 11 Governor’s Office .............................................................................. 182 Administrative Hearings, Office of ............................................ 21 Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting .. 185 African-American Affairs ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Highways, and J the Streamlined Decade of the 20Th Century, Man Managed to Get About Somehow
    ARIZOnA HIGHWAY✓n ovE:-m s�R . 1938 ADVENTURE OF THE OPEN ROAD. NORMAN G. WALLACE is You skim swiftly along on Highway 66 between Winslow and Flagstaff, through a land of distant horizons, where the world stretches endlessly around you and about you. Far, far away is the noise and bustle of the big city. Here there bigness and mystery and always adventure ahead '--� ... % ffl en> -a >% .. � ... - !!: 0 enz -I -I- C ...ffl • �-='�< .,. 0- 0 "' C , Cft .."'= � � en !!: � .. 0 CD CD ..• ';: 5'a CA a i: :, "' ...� JII a :, n :z: -· ..a, (IIn ..0 0 Travel Modes ,\\\&11 ' = .., 0 G Long before the era of modern Arizona highways, and J the streamlined decade of the 20th century, man managed to get about somehow. Along about 1907 and 1908, the gas buggy came along to scare Grandpop's horses. Left, we have a swanky affair. Could you name the make of the car, and could some of you old timers around Winslow name the occupants? To Lloyd C. Henning of Holbrook are we indebted for this pictorial relic of long ago. "Golden. Shell!" I scream • • • "Go there yourself!" he splutters And then there was the age before the gas buggy. Old Tombstone depended Mr. Bruggle can't hardly hear it upon the stage coach to carry travelers your engine, if your oil is sluggish, to and from Tucson. This photograph thunder. it don't get up out of the crank­ (right) was taken in Tombstone in the But I didn't know that, the first case-" '80's. The drivers were versatile and "I am NOT cranky!" he shouts, daring men, who had to protect their time he drives in.
    [Show full text]