FOREST PLAN MONITORING and EVALUATION REPORT Fiscal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FOREST PLAN MONITORING and EVALUATION REPORT Fiscal United States Department of Agriculture FOREST PLAN Forest Service MONITORING AND Beaverhead- EVALUATION REPORT Deerlodge National Forest Fiscal Year 2005 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity provider and employer Cover Photo: South Boulder River, Tobacco Roots, Janet Bean-Dochnahl. TABLE OF CONTENTS Forest Plan Monitoring & Evaluation Report Fiscal Year 2005......................................... 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 List of Preparers.............................................................................................................. 2 BEAVERHEAD NATIONAL FOREST............................................................................ 3 Summary of Observations............................................................................................... 3 Wildlife ........................................................................................................................... 6 Fisheries ........................................................................................................................ 13 Riparian......................................................................................................................... 17 Watershed ..................................................................................................................... 20 Soils............................................................................................................................... 22 Recreation ..................................................................................................................... 22 Range ............................................................................................................................ 28 Timber........................................................................................................................... 30 Facilities........................................................................................................................ 35 Protection ...................................................................................................................... 38 Economics..................................................................................................................... 40 Adjacent Lands ............................................................................................................. 42 Allocations .................................................................................................................... 45 Appeals ......................................................................................................................... 45 DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST............................................................................. 49 Summary of Observations............................................................................................. 49 Recreation ..................................................................................................................... 53 Roadless ........................................................................................................................ 55 Wilderness..................................................................................................................... 55 Wildlife ......................................................................................................................... 56 Fisheries ........................................................................................................................ 65 Riparian......................................................................................................................... 75 Range ............................................................................................................................ 76 Timber........................................................................................................................... 78 Soil and Water............................................................................................................... 88 Minerals ........................................................................................................................ 99 Protection .................................................................................................................... 100 Facilities...................................................................................................................... 103 Economics................................................................................................................... 105 Adjacent Lands ........................................................................................................... 106 All Resources.............................................................................................................. 108 Research...................................................................................................................... 109 Literature Cited ........................................................................................................... 116 Forest Plan Monitoring & Evaluation Report Fiscal Year 2005 Introduction This Forest Plan Annual Monitoring Report provides an account of the management activities of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest (BDNF) for Fiscal Year 2005 (October 2004- September 2005). Monitoring and evaluation are tools the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest uses to assess whether we are accomplishing the goals and objectives set forth in the Forest Plans. The results provide Forest line officers and employees, Regional and Washington offices, Congress, and the public with information on the progress and results of implementing the Forest Plans. Over the 19 years since implementation of Forest Plans, evaluation of data has been leading us closer to initiating Forest Plan revision. In 2002, this Forest began the process of revising the two Plans and consolidating them into one Plan. An important step preparing for Revision was to review the findings from a dozen previous Forest Monitoring and Evaluation Reports along with other information to determine which parts of the plan are in greatest need of revision. We know much of our current Plans direction (goals, objectives, outputs and costs) and the related monitoring items will be changing soon with the revised Plan. This year’s monitoring effort recognizes that fact. “Evaluation” refers to the detailed discussion provided in the draft Analysis of the Management Situation (2002). Monitoring information for the BDNF is presented in two separate reports because we still follow two separate Forest Plans until Plan Revision is complete. At that point, late in 2007, we will have a single Forest Plan for the BDNF. Until then, monitoring requirements are unique (though sometimes overlapping) for the Beaverhead and Deerlodge portions of the Forest. For some monitoring items, data is collected for the entire Forest and cannot be broken out by unit. This is noted as Forestwide data, where that is the case. The Beaverhead Report is presented first, then the Deerlodge. A separate Table of Contents and Summary of the monitoring items by Forest is presented at the beginning of each Forest Report. 2005 Monitoring & Evaluation Report Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest List of Preparers Resource Name and Position Appeals and NEPA Cindy Tencick, Appeals and Litigation Coordinator Economics, Emerging Issues Janet Bean-Dochnahl, Planner, Social Science Facilities, Transportation Craig Simonsen, Transportation Planner Fire Tammy Clark, Fire Management Officer Fisheries Jim Brammer, Fisheries Biologist Heritage Resources Mike Ryan, Archaeologist Insect and Disease, Research Robert Wooley, Forest Ecologist Minerals Dan Avery, Geologist Noxious Weeds Robert Wooley, Forest Ecologist Old Growth Art Rohrbacher, Wildlife Biologist Range Grant Godbolt, Range Management Specialist, Juanita Miller, Resource Assistant Recreation Patty Bates, Recreation/Lands/Eng Staff Officer Research Robert Wooley, Forest Ecologist Riparian and Watersheds Bryce Bohn, Dave Salo; Hydrologists Roadless Janet Bean-Dochnahl, Planner, Social Science Soils Dan Svoboda, Dave Ruppert, Karen Gallogly; Soil Scientists Timber Rick Henningsen, Timber Management Officer, Cathy Frey, Timber Resource Specialist Wildlife Art Rohrbacher, Wildlife Biologist Wilderness Jonathan Klein, Recreation Tech; John Ericson, Recreation Forester COORDINATORS: Peri Suenram, Planning Staff Officer, Janet Bean-Dochnahl, Planner WRITER/EDITOR: Sharon Sawyer, Program Analyst APPROVAL:
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of Gibbonsville, Shewag
    IDAHO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT 14-2 MOSCOW-BOISE-POCATELLO IDAHOGEOLOGY.ORG STEWART AND OTHERS TKi REGIONAL SETTING CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS 114° 113.5° Qa HOLOCENE TKi GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE GIBBONSVILLE , SHEWAG LAKE , AND ALLAN MOUNTAIN QUADRANGLES , AND PARTS 40’ 5061 38 Ydc e Qg g PLEISTOCENE CENOZOIC n x a e l R p Ydc e t fault OF THE OST RAIL ASS AND IG OLE ASS UADRANGLES , EMHI OUNTY , DAHO , AND AVALLI AND r L T P B H P Q L C I R i UNCONFORMITY m n h o p C p e e Ts ? Tfb 5060 a r g 40 S o n C a TKi 48 45 60 t EAVERHEAD OUNTIES , ONTANA R Tcv Tcr B C M 70 45 A’ o 50 t tains EOCENE 25 o o 65 r r o r oun Tcd oot detachme e r r 45 Ydc 55 54 40 t r t reek fault e t i t 45 e ? Lick C t Td B 50 t Eric D. Stewart, Travis D. Steel, David E. Stewart, and Paul K. Link 40 i tler M 5059 65 37 B in 40 60 Bit 46° UNCONFORMITY 2014 35 60 Ydc CRETACEOUS Yg onda-P onda detachmefault n TKi 40 Yg MESOZOIC 64 nac nac 40 A A Lick C 630 000 FEET Qa reek fault (MT) 58 Yg 5058 60 32 45 UNCONFORMITY MAP LOCATION AND SCALE Yg 75 Ys 60 LEMHI SUB-BASIN BELT BASIN? MESOPROTEROZOIC This Technical Report is independent mapping by Eric D. Stewart, Travis 40 alls D.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Mountain Passes Across Continental Divide Segments Surrounding the Southwest Montana Big Hole and Beaverhead River Drainage Basins, USA
    Open Journal of Geology, 2017, 7, 1362-1385 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojg ISSN Online: 2161-7589 ISSN Print: 2161-7570 Origin of Mountain Passes across Continental Divide Segments Surrounding the Southwest Montana Big Hole and Beaverhead River Drainage Basins, USA Eric Clausen Jenkintown, PA, USA How to cite this paper: Clausen, E. (2017) Abstract Origin of Mountain Passes across Conti- nental Divide Segments Surrounding the The evolution of southwest Montana’s Big Hole and Beaverhead River drai- Southwest Montana Big Hole and Beaver- nage basins is determined from topographic map evidence related to moun- head River Drainage Basins, USA. Open Jour- tain passes crossing what are today high altitude drainage divides including nal of Geology, 7, 1362-1385. North America’s east-west Continental Divide. Map evidence, such as orien- https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2017.79091 tations of valleys leading away from mountain passes (and saddles) and Received: August 15, 2017 barbed tributaries found along the downstream drainage routes, is used to re- Accepted: September 16, 2017 construct flow directions of streams and rivers that once crossed the present-day Published: September 19, 2017 high mountain divides. Large south-oriented anastomosing complexes of di- verging and converging channels are interpreted to have eroded what are Copyright © 2017 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. today closely spaced passes and saddles now notched into high mountain ridges. This work is licensed under the Creative Water in those south-oriented channels is interpreted to have flowed across Commons Attribution International emerging mountains and subsiding basins. Headward erosion of deeper south- License (CC BY 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • An Administrative History of Big Hole National Battlefield. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 440 038 SO 031 703 AUTHOR Catton, Theodore; Hubber, Ann TITLE Commemoration and Preservation: An Administrative History of Big Hole National Battlefield. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 1999-00-00 NOTE 202p.; Prepared by Historical Research Associates, Inc., Missoula, Montana for the National Park Service's Columbia Cascades Support Office. AVAILABLE FROM United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Big Hole National Battlefield, P.O. Box 237, Wisdom, MT 59761. Tel: 406-689-3155. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/biho/adhi/adhi.htm. PUB TYPE Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *American Indians; Educational Facilities; Field Trips; *Government Role; Historic Sites; Indigenous Populations; *National Parks; *United States History; *War IDENTIFIERS Nez Perce (Tribe); Site Visits ABSTRACT Few places in the west are as evocative of the tragic story of the Indian Wars as Big Hole (Montana) National Battlefield. The site memorializes the bravery of the Nez Perce and U.S. soldiers and volunteers who fought there during the epic flight of the Nez Perce in 1877. Big Hole preserves the scene of one of the most famous battles of the Indian Wars. This administrative history is divided into chronological chapters, with each chapter divided into topical sections and subsections. A chronological organization highlights two salient themes in Big Hole National Battlefield's administrative development:(1) its long evolution as a small unit assigned to a succession of federal agencies (the War Department, the Forest Service, and the National Park Service); and (2) the close connection that exists between its land base, interpretive (education) program, and resource management.
    [Show full text]
  • Presettlement Vegetation of Southern Beaverhead County, Montana
    PRESETTLEMENT VEGETATION OF SOUTHERN BEAVERHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA Peter Lesica & Stephen V. Cooper Montana Natural Heritage Program P.O. Box 201800 1515 East Sixth Avenue Helena, Montana 59620-1800 © 1997 Montana Natural Heritage Program Prepared for: USDI Bureau of Land Management State Office P.O. Box 36800 Billings, MT 59107-6800 (Assistance Agreement No. 1422-E950-A1-0006; Task Order # 32) and USDA Forest Service Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest 420 Barrett Street Dillon, MT 59725 (Challenge Cost-Share Agreement No. 11-01-02-95-36) This document should be cited as follows: Lesica, P. and S. V. Cooper. 1997. Presettlement vegetation of southern Beaverhead County, Montana. Unpublished report to the State Office, Bureau of Land Management and Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 35 pp. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3 METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 3 RESULTS........................................................................................................................ 6 Hypothesis 1. Bison were common in southern Beaverhead County .................. 6 Hypothesis 2. Livestock grazing was common in the later part of the 19th Century ................................................................................................................ 7 Hypothesis 3. Palatable bunch grasses had
    [Show full text]
  • National Historic Trail Progress Report Winter 2016
    Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail Progress Report Winter 2016 Administrator’s Corner Dear NPNHT Supporters, I would like to begin with a heartfelt thank you for making 2015 a year of major progress for the Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail (NPNHT). With your help we enhanced our outreach and education efforts, and made advancements for heritage, stewardship, conservation preservation, and continued to share the NPNHT with a wide audience. Your support and dedication to the NPNHT is making a positive impact to preserve and protect this important National Historic Trail to make it more accessible for everyone whether they visit the Trail on the ground, visit special sites associated with the Trail, or virtually. In 2015, together we empowered many volunteers and Challenge Cost Share partners. Some of those resulted in the reopening of more than 3 miles of trail on the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forest and the 2016 “Exploring the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail” marketing program for the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountain Regions which will build upon the awareness generated from the 2015 program. We added NPNHT historic sites and visitor centers Photo Service Forest U.S. on new Auto Tour brochures for Montana, Idaho, and Oregon and including the NPNHT on Sandra Broncheau- reprinted brochures for Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota. To see more on our great McFarland with Smokey partners see details in side of this report. Bear. We enabled thousands of people to virtually access the trail through the NPNHT website, our photo gallery, Flickr and YouTube, and virtual Trail experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices (PDF)
    Appendices Appendix A: Background Information for the Lewis and Clark Expedition ............................................................. 3 The Expedition: Making Ready ................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Supplies .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Timeline for the Lewis and Clark Expedition ............................................................................................................. 9 Map of the Westward Route of the Lewis and Clark Expedition ............................................................................ 19 Map of the Eastbound Route of the Lewis and Clark Expedition ............................................................................ 20 The Expedition: Putting Away ................................................................................................................................ 21 Appendix B: People of the Lewis and Clark Expedition ....................................................................................... 23 President Thomas Jefferson ................................................................................................................................... 23 Captain Meriwether Lewis (Co-Leader) .................................................................................................................. 24 Seaman (Dog and Expedition
    [Show full text]
  • Tertiary Sediments of the Big Hole Valley and Pioneer Mountains, Southwestern Montana: Age, Provenance, and Tectonic Implications
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2010 Tertiary Sediments of the Big Hole Valley and Pioneer Mountains, Southwestern Montana: Age, Provenance, and Tectonic Implications Warren Paul Roe The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Roe, Warren Paul, "Tertiary Sediments of the Big Hole Valley and Pioneer Mountains, Southwestern Montana: Age, Provenance, and Tectonic Implications" (2010). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1318. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1318 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TERTIARY SEDIMENTS OF THE BIG HOLE VALLEY AND PIONEER MOUNTAINS, SOUTHWESTERN MONTANA: AGE, PROVENANCE, AND TECTONIC IMPLICATIONS By Warren Paul Roe B.A., Geography, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 2002 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geosciences The University of Montana Missoula, MT August 2010 Approved by: Perry Brown, Associate Provost for Graduate Education Graduate School James Sears, Committee Chair Geosciences Julia Baldwin Geosciences Paul Wilson Geography Roe, Warren, M.S., Summer 2010 Geosciences Tertiary sediments of the Big Hole Valley and Pioneer Mountains, southwestern Montana: Age, Provenance, and Tectonic Implications Committee Chair: James Sears Tertiary terrestrial sedimentary rocks of the Big Hole basin and Pioneer Mountains of southwestern Montana provide a record of regional extensional tectonism.
    [Show full text]
  • Metallogeny of Mesoproterozoic Sedimentary Rocks in Idaho and Montana—Studies by the Mineral Resources Program, U.S
    Metallogeny of Mesoproterozoic Sedimentary Rocks in Idaho and Montana—Studies by the Mineral Resources Program, U.S. Geological Survey, 2004–2007 Open-File Report 2007–1280 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Metallogeny of Mesoproterozoic Sedimentary Rocks in Idaho and Montana—Studies by the Mineral Resources Program, U.S. Geological Survey, 2004–2007 Edited by J. Michael O’Neill Contributions by J. Michael O’Neill, Edward T. Ruppel, David A. Lopez, Arthur A. Bookstrom, Craig A. Johnson, Gary P. Landis, Thomas P. Frost, and John F. Slack Volume comprises Chapters A, B, and C Open-File Report 2007–1280 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This publication has not been reviewed for stratigraphic nomenclature. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: O’Neill, J.M., ed., 2007, Metallogeny of Mesoproterozoic sedimentary rocks in Idaho and Montana—Studies by the Mineral Resources Program, 2004–2007: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Official Publication of the Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundation, Inc
    The Official Publication of the Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundation, Inc. Vol. 24, No. 4 November 1998 - THE LEWIS AND CLARK TRAIL •. HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INC. In this issue- Incorporated 1969 under Missouri General Not-For-Profit Corporation Act IRS Exemption Certificate No. 501 (C)(3)- ldentification No. 51-0187715 Page 4- A Closer Look at the Uniform Coats OFFICERS ACTIVE PA.ST PRESIDENTS of the Lewis and Clark Expedition President Irving W. Anderson Bob Moore David Borlaug Pore/and. Oregon Box 492 Robert K. Doerk. Jr. Washburn, ND 58577 Cheyenne. Vlryoming Page 9- President Elect James R. Fazio Meriwether Lewis's Cindy Orlando Moscow. Idaho Box 604-FC Robert E. Gatten. Jr. "Curious Adventure" Ascoria, OR 97103 Greensboro, North Carolina Dayton Duncan Vice President H. john Montague Barbara Kubik Portland. Oregon 17 12 S. Perry Ct. Clyde G "Sid" Huggins Page 14- Kennewick. WA 99338 Mandeville. Louisiana Bismarck Is Ready to Serve You Secretary Donald F. Nell Ludd Trozpek Bozeman. Montana 4 141 Via Padova James M. Peterson Page 16- Claremont. CA 91 71 I Vermillion. South Dakota "We Encamped By Some Treasurer jerry Garrett William P. Sherman Butifull Springs" IO I 7 4 Sakura Drive Portland. Oregon An Interpretation of Captain William St. Louis, MO 63128 L. Edwin Wang Clark's Campsite on July 7, 1806 Immediate Past President Minneapolis. Minnesota Anna Loge James M. Peterson Wilbur P. Werner Vermillion, SD 57069 Mesa. Arizona Executive Director Stuart E. Knapp Page 28- Sammye Meadows Bozeman. Montana 597 I 5 'This Report Has Vexed Me a Little" DIRECTORS A.T LARGE William Clark Reports on An Affair of Honor Jane Henley Robert Weir Beverly Hinds Larry Epstein James j.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana and Idaho Day & Overnight Hikes Guide
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: IDAHO & MONTANA Photo by Steven Shattuck CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT IDAHO & MONTANA! Day & Overnight Hikes on the CDT THE GEM STATE AND THE TREASURE STATE Montana, known as “The Treasure State” and “Big Sky Country,” and Idaho, “The Gem State,” offer many wonderful Continental Divide Trail (CDT) experiences! The trail meanders along the southern border of Montana and eastern border of Idaho and extends for 1,012 miles through the two states, running through the present-day and ancestral lands of numerous Native American tribes including the Niitsitapi (Blackfoot), Ktunaxa, Eastern Shoshone, Lemhi Shoshone, Shoshone-Bannock, Salish Kootenai, and Tsuu T’ina tribes. In these states you’ll find mountain goats, grizzly bears, wolves, and bald eagles, as well as douglas fir, lodgepole pine, aspen, lady-slipper, buttercups, beargrass, and glacier lilies. We’ve put together this list of the best day and overnight hikes on the CDT in Montana and Idaho for you to explore some of our favorite parts of the trail! Hikes in this guide are listed from south to north. WILDLIFE: Idaho and Montana have both black bears and grizzly bears, each with distinct characteristics and behaviors. We recommend learning more about best practices while hiking in bear country. If you plan on hiking, make sure you are prepared with bear spray. MOUNTAIN WEATHER: Snow can stay in the high mountains long into the summer. Remember that you likely won’t be able to get to the higher trails during the winter and spring. Additionally, mountain weather can change drastically and unpredictably.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology
    Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Biennial Report of Activities and Programs July 1, 2004–June 30, 2006 Compiled by the Staff of the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Edmond G. Deal Director and State Geologist Biennial Report of Activities and Programs, 2004–2006 Contents Director’s Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Research Division Introduction ............................................................................................3 Geologic Projects ................................................................................................................ 5 Geologic Mapping Program ...........................................................................................5 Stratigraphic Research .................................................................................................. 7 Montana Sapphires ....................................................................................................... 8 Industrial Minerals of Montana ...................................................................................... 9 Mineral Museum ............................................................................................................10 A Rock by Any Other Name: Understanding Lewis and Clark’s Geography, Geology and Navigation in Montana ......................................................................................12 Montana Seismograph Network and Earthquake Studies Offi ce .................................
    [Show full text]
  • GM62 2007Booklet.Pdf
    Front Cover: Precambrian Mt. Cowan gneiss underlies these unnamed peaks in the Absaroka Range, Park County. Photo by Jeff Lonn, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology. GEOLOGIC MAP OF MONTANA Edition 1.0 (2007) Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Geologic Map 62 Compiled by: Susan M. Vuke, Karen W. Porter, Jeffrey D. Lonn, and David A. Lopez Director and State Geologist Edmond G. Deal Assistant Director Research Division Chief Marvin Miller John Metesh Geologic Mappers Geologic Editors Richard B. Berg Karen Porter Susan Vuke Robert N. Bergantino Phyllis A. Hargrave Geographic Information Systems David A. Lopez Ken Sandau Jeffrey D. Lonn Paul Thale Catherine McDonald Cartography and Graphic Design Karen W. Porter Susan Smith Larry N. Smith Michael C. Stickney Editors Edith M. Wilde Susan Barth Kay Eccleston Susan M. Vuke Butte offi ce Billings offi ce 1300 W. Park Street 1300 N. 27th Street Butte, Montana 59701 http://www.mbmg.mtech.edu Billings, Montana 59101 Telephone: (406) 496-4180 Telephone: (406) 657-2938 Fax: (406) 496-4451 Fax: (406) 657-2633 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction. 1 Descriptions of Stratigraphic Units . 11 Source Maps for Plate 1 . 21 30' x 60' Quadrangles . 21 1° x 2° Quadrangles . 57 References Cited . 65 FIGURES Figure 1. Cultural features . 2 Figure 2. Physiographic features. .3 Figure 3. Precambrian provinces . .4 Figure 4. Major tectonic features . .5 Figure 5. Major faults . .6 Figure 6. Central Montana tectonic and physiographic features . .7 Figure 7. Plutons, diatremes, and other intrusive rock . .8 Figure 8. Volcanic rock. .9 Figure 9. Index of source maps available online as of July 2007.
    [Show full text]