DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mass a Study of the Roman Liturgy Nihil Ob‘Tat: F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Mass a Study of the Roman Liturgy Nihil Ob‘Tat: F The Mass A Study of the Roman Liturgy Nihil Ob`tat: F. Thos. Bergh, O.S.B., Censor deputatus Imprimatur: Edm. Can. Surmont, Vic. gen. Westmonasterii, die 26 Martii, 1912. The Mass A Study of the Roman Liturgy Adrian Fortescue G P Goretti Publications 1200 Dozenal numeration is a system of thinking of numbers in twelves, rather than tens. Twelve is much more versatile, having four even divisors—2, 3, 4, and 6—as opposed to only two for ten. This means that such hatefulness as “0.333 ... ” for 1/3 and “0.1666 ... ” for 1/6 are things of the past, replaced by easy “0;4” (four twelfths) and “0;2” (two twelfths). In dozenal, counting goes “one, two, three, four, ve, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, elv, dozen; dozen one, dozen two, dozen three, dozen four, dozen ve, dozen six, dozen seven, dozen eight, dozen nine, dozen ten, dozen elv, two dozen, two dozen one ... ” It’s written as 2 2 3 such: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, , ,3 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1 , 1 , 20, 21 . Dozenal counting is at once much more ecient and much easier than decimal counting, and takes only a little bit of time to get used to. Further information can be had from the dozenal societies (http://www.dozenal.org), as well as in many other places on the Internet. This text is in the public domain, originally published in 1142 (1922). This document may be copied and distributed freely, as its text is in the public domain. Goretti Publications http://gorpub.freeshell.org [email protected] Table of Contents Editors’ Preface vii Preface ix Preface to the Second Edition xi I. The History of the Mass I. TheEucharist in the First ThreeCenturies 3 1. Liturgical Fragments in the New Testament ............. 3 2. The Liturgy in the Apostolic Fathers ................ 7 3. The Liturgy in the Second Century .................. 3 4. The Fathers of the Third Century . 16 5. Liturgical Uniformity in the First Three Centuries . 25 6. The Liturgy in the Early Church Orders . 28 7. The Liturgy in Apostolic Constitutions VIII . 31 8. Some Special Points .......................... 34 9. Influence of Jewish ritual ....................... 36 II. The Parent Rites and Their Descendants 3 3 1. The Development of the Parent Rites ................ 3 3 2. The Antiochene Rite ........................ 41 3. Liturgies derived from Antioch ................... 44 4. The Alexandrine Rite ........................ 49 5. The Gallican Rite .......................... 4 3 6. Table of Liturgies .......................... 55 III. The Origin of the Roman Rite 57 1. State of the Question ......................... 57 2. Earliest Liturgical Books ....................... 59 3. Latin as the Liturgical Language ................... 64 iii iv Contents 4. First Traces of the Roman Mass ................... 65 5. Conjectured Reconstructions of the Mass ............... 6 3 6. Bunsen’s Theory ........................... 70 7. Probst and Bickell .......................... 71 8. Dom Cagin .............................. 72 9. Mr. W. C. Bishop .......................... 73 .2 Dr. Baumstark ............................ 75 .3 Dr. Buchwald ............................ 76 10. Dr. Drews .............................. 79 11. Dom Cabrol ............................. 84 12. Concluding Remarks ......................... 85 IV. The Mass Since Gregory I 87 1. From Gregory I to Adrian I (590-795) . 87 2. The Spread of the Roman rite .................... 8 2 3. Gallican Influence .......................... 91 4. Dierent Kinds of Mass. Low Mass . 92 5. Mediæval and Later Commentators . 97 6. Mediæval derived rites ........................ 9 2 7. The Reform of Pius V (1570) .................... 2 8. Later Revisions and Modern Times ................. 42 II. The Order of the Mass V. To the Collects 92 1. Arrangements of the Parts of the Mass ............... 92 2 2. The Introit .............................. 3 3. The Celebrant’s Preparation ..................... 3 4. First Incensing of the Altar ..................... 53 5. Kyrie eleison ............................. 63 3 6. Gloria in Excelsis ........................... 3 7. Collects ................................ 103 VI. The Lessons 109 1. The Lessons in General . 109 2. Epistle ................................ 112 Contents v 3. Gradual, Alleluia, Tract and Sequence . 113 4. Gospel ................................ 120 5. Homily and Creed . 122 VII. The Mass of the Faithful to the Eucharis- tic Prayer 127 1. The Prayers of the Faithful . 127 2. The Oertory Act . 129 3. Azyme bread ............................ 12 3 4. The Oertory Chant . 131 5. Oertory Prayers . 131 6. The Incensing and Washing of Hands . 133 7. Secrets ................................. 135 VIII.The Canon 139 1. The Preface .............................. 139 2. Sanctus ................................140 3. Name, Extent and General Character of the Canon . 142 4. Te Igitur to the Words of Institution . 145 5. The Elevation ............................. 14 2 6. To the End of the Canon . 152 IX. The Communion 15 3 1. The Lord’s Prayer .......................... 15 3 2. Fraction, Commixture, Fermentum . 161 3. Kiss of Peace .............................164 4. The Communion Act . 165 5. Communion under One Kind . 168 6. Communion Prayers ......................... 16 3 7. Agnus Dei and Communion Antiphon . 171 X. After the Communion 173 1. Postcommunion and Oratio super Populum . 173 2. Dismissal ............................... 174 3. After the Dismissal . 175 vi Contents Appendices Appendix A. The Names of the Mass 179 Appendix B. The Epiklesis 181 Appendices for the New Edition Appendix C. Notes on the Text 187 Appendix D. About the Author 189 Editors’ Preface his series of Handbooks is designed to meet a need, which, the Editors be- lieve, has been widely felt, and which results in great measure from the pre- T dominant importance attached to Dogmatic and Moral Theology in the studies preliminary to the Priesthood. That the rst place must of necessity be given to these subjects will not be disputed. But there remains a large outlying eld of professional knowledge which is always in danger of being crowded out in the years before ordination, and the practical utility of which may not be fully realised until some experience of the ministry has been gained. It will be the aim of the present series to ofer the sort of help which is dictated by such experience, and its developments will be largely guided by the suggestions, past and future, of the Clergy themselves. To provide Textbooks for Dog- matic Treatises is not contemplated—at any rate not at the outset. On the other hand, the pastoral work of the missionary priests will be kept constantly in view, and the series will also deal with those historical and liturgical aspects of Catholic belief and practice which are every day being brought more into prominence. That the needs of English-speaking countries are, in these respects, exceptional, must be manifest to all. In point of treatment it seems desirable that the volumes should be popular rather than scholastic, but the Editors hope that by the selection of writers, fully competent in their special subjects, the information given may always be accurate and abreast of modern research. The kind approval of this scheme by His Grace the Archbishop of Westminster, in whose Diocese these manuals are edited, has suggested that the series should be introduced to the public under the general title of TheWestminster Library. It is hoped, however, that contributors may also be found among the distinguished Clergy of Ireland and America, and that the Westminster Library will be representative of Catholic scholarship in all Engiish-speaking countries. vii Preface his book is intended to supply information about the history of the Roman liturgy. The dogmatic side of the Mass is discussed by the Bishop of Newport in T the same series.1 The title shows that it is a study of the Roman rite. It is only in the Roman (or Gallican) rite that the Eucharistic service can correctly be called Mass. The chapter about other liturgies and the frequent references to them throughout are meant only to put our Roman Mass in its proper perspective and to illustrate its elements by comparison. In spite of the risk of repetition, the clearest plan seemed to be to discuss rst the origin and development of the Mass in general; and then to go through the service as it stands now, adding notes to each prayer and ceremony. The present time is perhaps hardly the most convenient for attempting a history of the Mass. For never before have there been so many or so various theories as to its origin, as to the development of the Canon, the Epiklesis and so on. Where the best authorities difer so widely it would be absurd to pretend to ofer a nal solution. I have no pretence of supplying a new answer to any of these questions, or even of taking a side nally among theories already proposed. The only reasonable course seems to be to state the chief systems now defended and to leave the reader to make up his own mind. I have however shewn some preference for the main ideas of Dr. Drews and Dr. Baumstark and for certain points advanced by Dr. Buchwald. And I have added a few general remarks on the points which seem to me to be fairly established. But this has not, I think, prevented a fair statement of other theories; nor should it make it more dicult for the reader to see the present state of the dicult questions. I doubt if it be possible to think of a solution of the main question (the order of the Canon) which has not yet been proposed, or of one that has not some diculties. At any rate I have thought of none such. The list of books at the end represents the chief sources used in writing this one. Though obviously exceedingly incomplete (a bibliography of the Mass would be a gigantic undertaking), it will perhaps be of some use as a rst guide to further study. If a reference in the notes is not complete it will be found complete there.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dogma of the Assumption in the Light of the First Seven Ecumenical Councils
    University of Dayton eCommons Marian Reprints Marian Library Publications 1-1961 080 - The ogD ma of the Assumption in the Light of the First Seven Ecumenical Councils Gregory Cardinal Peter XV Agagianian Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_reprints Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Agagianian, Gregory Cardinal Peter XV, "080 - The oD gma of the Assumption in the Light of the First Seven Ecumenical Councils" (1961). Marian Reprints. Paper 97. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_reprints/97 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Marian Library Publications at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marian Reprints by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Gregory Peter XV Cardinal Agagianian is perhaps one of the best­ known of the non-American Cardinals. He has become familiar to Amer­ ican Catholic and non-Catholic readers because of the publicity given to his appointment to succeed Cardinal Stritch as Pro-prefect of the Sacred Congregation of the Faith in June, 1958. At this time and during the period following the death of the late Pius XII, he was considered by many observers as one of the most likely "candidates" for the Papacy. His two trips to the United States in 1954 and in May of this past year have served to bring him to the attention of the American public. Born in the Russian Caucasus sixty-five years ago, Cardinal Agagianian grew up in what is now Russian Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirby Catalogue Part 8 1891-1895
    Archival list The Kirby Collection Catalogue Irish College Rome ARCHIVES PONTIFICAL IRISH COLLEGE, ROME Code Date Description and Extent KIR/ 1890 / 494 circa 1890 Holograph letter from Sr. Mary, Rome, to Kirby: Writer thanks Kirby for consenting to be their confessor. Query as to steps to be taken. [see KIR/1890/316] ['Sr. Mary' would appear to be the Foundress of the Little Company of Mary.] 3pp 495 31 December Holograph letter from J.J. Farr, Chettendale, Marrickville, 1890 to Kirby: Personal letter. [Although this letter is dated 'December 31st 1890', the postscript which states 'All well but very hot here' is dated January 5th 1891.] 1p 1 1 January Holograph letter from Sr. M. Peter Frances O'Reilly, 1891 Lisbon, to Kirby: Convent news. Sisters M. de Ricci and Martha died during 1890. School has fallen off considerably of late years, probably due to number of schools now in the country and 'rage amongst the higher class for foreign governesses'. Requests Pope's blessing on 'his Irish children in Bon Successo, Lisbon' and a special one on the writer who celebrates Golden Jubilee of her profession on 5 October of present year. Necessary to re-open novitiate to admit 2 'promising novices', the one French and the other from Loanda, a former pupil'. 4pp 2 1 January Holograph letter from Sr. M. Ignatius Walsh, Yarrawonga, 1891 Victoria, to Kirby: Personal letter. 4pp 3 1 January Holograph letter from Sr. Mary A. Beckett, Birr, to Kirby: 1891 Thanks Kirby for painting of Our Lady of Mercy, which writer has had framed in Dublin and erected in their own chapel 'in time for St.
    [Show full text]
  • Colin Mcallister Regnum Caelorum Terrestre: the Apocalyptic Vision of Lactantius May 2016
    Colin McAllister Regnum Caelorum Terrestre: The Apocalyptic Vision of Lactantius May 2016 Abstract: The writings of the early fourth-century Christian apologist L. Caecilius Firmianus Lactantius have been extensively studied by historians, classicists, philosophers and theologians. But his unique apocalyptic eschatology expounded in book VII of the Divinae Institutiones, his largest work, has been relatively neglected. This paper will distill Lactantius’s complex narrative and summarize his sources. In particular, I investigate his chiliasm and the nature of the intermediate state, as well as his portrayal of the Antichrist. I argue that his apocalypticism is not an indiscriminate synthesis of varying sources - as it often stated - but is essentially based on the Book of Revelation and other Patristic sources. +++++ The eminent expert on all things apocalyptic, Bernard McGinn, wrote: Even the students and admirers of Lactantius have not bestowed undue praise upon him. To Rene Pichon [who wrote in 1901 what is perhaps still the seminal work on Lactantius’ thought] ‘Lactantius is mediocre in the Latin sense of the word - and also a bit in the French sense’; to Vincenzo Loi [who studied Lactantius’ use of the Bible] ‘Lactantius is neither a philosophical or theological genius nor linguistic genius.’ Despite these uneven appraisals, the writings of the early fourth-century Christian apologist L. Caecilius Firmianus Lactantius [c. 250-325] hold, it seems, a little something for everyone.1 Political historians study Lactantius as an important historical witness to the crucial transitional period from the Great Persecution of Diocletian to the ascension of Constantine, and for insight into the career of the philosopher Porphyry.2 Classicists and 1 All dates are anno domini unless otherwise indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Church and Liturgical Objects and Terms
    Church and Liturgical Objects and Terms Liturgical Objects Used in Church The chalice: The The paten: The vessel which golden “plate” that holds the wine holds the bread that that becomes the becomes the Sacred Precious Blood of Body of Christ. Christ. The ciborium: A The pyx: golden vessel A small, closing with a lid that is golden vessel that is used for the used to bring the distribution and Blessed Sacrament to reservation of those who cannot Hosts. come to the church. The purificator is The cruets hold the a small wine and the water rectangular cloth that are used at used for wiping Mass. the chalice. The lavabo towel, The lavabo and which the priest pitcher: used for dries his hands after washing the washing them during priest's hands. the Mass. The corporal is a square cloth placed The altar cloth: A on the altar beneath rectangular white the chalice and cloth that covers paten. It is folded so the altar for the as to catch any celebration of particles of the Host Mass. that may accidentally fall The altar A new Paschal candles: Mass candle is prepared must be and blessed every celebrated with year at the Easter natural candles Vigil. This light stands (more than 51% near the altar during bees wax), which the Easter Season signify the and near the presence of baptismal font Christ, our light. during the rest of the year. It may also stand near the casket during the funeral rites. The sanctuary lamp: Bells, rung during A candle, often red, the calling down that burns near the of the Holy Spirit tabernacle when the to consecrate the Blessed Sacrament is bread and wine present there.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Rite Catholicism
    Eastern Rite Catholicism Religious Practices Religious Items Requirements for Membership Medical Prohibitions Dietary Standards Burial Rituals Sacred Writings Organizational Structure History Theology RELIGIOUS PRACTICES Required Daily Observances. None. However, daily personal prayer is highly recommended. Required Weekly Observances. Participation in the Divine Liturgy (Mass) is required. If the Divine Liturgy is not available, participation in the Latin Rite Mass fulfills the requirement. Required Occasional Observances. The Eastern Rites follow a liturgical calendar, as does the Latin Rite. However, there are significant differences. The Eastern Rites still follow the Julian Calendar, which now has a difference of about 13 days – thus, major feasts fall about 13 days after they do in the West. This could be a point of contention for Eastern Rite inmates practicing Western Rite liturgies. Sensitivity should be maintained by possibly incorporating special prayer on Eastern Rite Holy days into the Mass. Each liturgical season has a focus; i.e., Christmas (Incarnation), Lent (Human Mortality), Easter (Salvation). Be mindful that some very important seasons do not match Western practices; i.e., Christmas and Holy Week. Holy Days. There are about 28 holy days in the Eastern Rites. However, only some require attendance at the Divine Liturgy. In the Byzantine Rite, those requiring attendance are: Epiphany, Ascension, St. Peter and Paul, Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and Christmas. Of the other 15 solemn and seven simple holy days, attendance is not mandatory but recommended. (1 of 5) In the Ukrainian Rites, the following are obligatory feasts: Circumcision, Easter, Dormition of Mary, Epiphany, Ascension, Immaculate Conception, Annunciation, Pentecost, and Christmas.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpolated Amen's in the Canon of the Mass Öerald Ellard, S.J., Ph.D
    INTERPOLATED AMEN'S IN THE CANON OF THE MASS ÖERALD ELLARD, S.J., PH.D. St. Mary^s College FJEW things are so venerable, few so carefully guarded, as the canon *• of the Roman Mass. It is indicative of how highly it was regarded from the very earliest period that the oldest Latin Mass-books of Spain, Gaul, and Ireland, different as they are in so many respects, all spontaneously adopted that Roman canon, which Pope Vigilius had described in 538, shortly before Gregory the Great was born, as of apostolic antiquity: "textum . .quern Deo propitio ex apostolica tradi- tione suscepimus."1 True, the canon, as we use it now, is called Gregorian in perpetuation of the memory of the revision, slight and insignificant, that Gregory gave it around 595. For all that, the canon in our Mass-book contains four interpolated amen's—at the conclusion of the prayers Communicantes, Rane igitur, Supplices, and Memento etiam—and narrowly missed permanently acquiring a fifth one, at the end of the Nobis quoque peccatoribus. This article centers attention on those adventitious amen's and seeks to unravel their story somewhat more accurately than I have seen it set out elsewhere. There is need of greater precision in the matter. Thus, Dom Bernard Botte, in his definitive Le canon de la Messe, edition critique, in the excellent apparatus criticus setting out the variant readings of the oldest texts, hinted that these four amen's came in with the edition of the canon printed at Rome in 1474.2 He adduced that particular edition of the Roman Mass-book because it then issued in print for the first time and has been reprinted nowadays for our con­ sultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Vestments and Sacred Vessels Used at Mass
    Vestments and Sacred Vessels used at Mass Amice (optional) This is a rectangular piece of cloth with two long ribbons attached to the top corners. The priest puts it over his shoulders, tucking it in around the neck to hide his cassock and collar. It is worn whenever the alb does not completely cover the ordinary clothing at the neck (GI 297). It is then tied around the waist. It symbolises a helmet of salvation and a sign of resistance against temptation. 11 Alb This long, white, vestment reaching to the ankles and is worn when celebrating Mass. Its name comes from the Latin ‘albus’ meaning ‘white.’ This garment symbolises purity of heart. Worn by priest, deacon and in many places by the altar servers. Cincture (optional) This is a long cord used for fastening some albs at the waist. It is worn over the alb by those who wear an alb. It is a symbol of chastity. It is usually white in colour. Stole A stole is a long cloth, often ornately decorated, of the same colour and style as the chasuble. A stole traditionally stands for the power of the priesthood and symbolises obedience. The priest wears it around the neck, letting it hang down the front. A deacon wears it over his right shoulder and fastened at his left side like a sash. Chasuble The chasuble is the sleeveless outer vestment, slipped over the head, hanging down from the shoulders and covering the stole and alb. It is the proper Mass vestment of the priest and its colour varies according to the feast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Marian Doctrine As
    INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, OHIO in affiliation with the PONTIFICAL THEOLOGICAL FACULTY MARIANUM ROME, ITALY By: Elizabeth Marie Farley The Development of Marian Doctrine as Reflected in the Commentaries on the Wedding at Cana (John 2:1-5) by the Latin Fathers and Pastoral Theologians of the Church From the Fourth to the Seventeenth Century A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Sacred Theology with specialization in Marian Studies Director: Rev. Bertrand Buby, S.M. Marian Library/International Marian Research Institute University of Dayton 300 College Park Dayton, OH 45469-1390 2013 i Copyright © 2013 by Elizabeth M. Farley All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Nihil obstat: François Rossier, S.M., STD Vidimus et approbamus: Bertrand A. Buby S.M., STD – Director François Rossier, S.M., STD – Examinator Johann G. Roten S.M., PhD, STD – Examinator Thomas A. Thompson S.M., PhD – Examinator Elio M. Peretto, O.S.M. – Revisor Aristide M. Serra, O.S.M. – Revisor Daytonesis (USA), ex aedibus International Marian Research Institute, et Romae, ex aedibus Pontificiae Facultatis Theologicae Marianum, die 22 Augusti 2013. ii Dedication This Dissertation is Dedicated to: Father Bertrand Buby, S.M., The Faculty and Staff at The International Marian Research Institute, Father Jerome Young, O.S.B., Father Rory Pitstick, Joseph Sprug, Jerome Farley, my beloved husband, and All my family and friends iii Table of Contents Prėcis.................................................................................. xvii Guidelines........................................................................... xxiii Abbreviations...................................................................... xxv Chapter One: Purpose, Scope, Structure and Method 1.1 Introduction...................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liturgical Press Style Guide
    STYLE GUIDE LITURGICAL PRESS Collegeville, Minnesota www.litpress.org STYLE GUIDE Seventh Edition Prepared by the Editorial and Production Staff of Liturgical Press LITURGICAL PRESS Collegeville, Minnesota www.litpress.org Scripture texts in this work are taken from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Catholic Edition © 1989, 1993, Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Cover design by Ann Blattner © 1980, 1983, 1990, 1997, 2001, 2004, 2008 by Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, Minnesota. Printed in the United States of America. Contents Introduction 5 To the Author 5 Statement of Aims 5 1. Submitting a Manuscript 7 2. Formatting an Accepted Manuscript 8 3. Style 9 Quotations 10 Bibliography and Notes 11 Capitalization 14 Pronouns 22 Titles in English 22 Foreign-language Titles 22 Titles of Persons 24 Titles of Places and Structures 24 Citing Scripture References 25 Citing the Rule of Benedict 26 Citing Vatican Documents 27 Using Catechetical Material 27 Citing Papal, Curial, Conciliar, and Episcopal Documents 27 Citing the Summa Theologiae 28 Numbers 28 Plurals and Possessives 28 Bias-free Language 28 4. Process of Publication 30 Copyediting and Designing 30 Typesetting and Proofreading 30 Marketing and Advertising 33 3 5. Parts of the Work: Author Responsibilities 33 Front Matter 33 In the Text 35 Back Matter 36 Summary of Author Responsibilities 36 6. Notes for Translators 37 Additions to the Text 37 Rearrangement of the Text 37 Restoring Bibliographical References 37 Sample Permission Letter 38 Sample Release Form 39 4 Introduction To the Author Thank you for choosing Liturgical Press as the possible publisher of your manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • 5922F53627bed1.99452702.Pdf
    Did you know? you Did YOUR BUSYCALENDAR FOR STARBUCKS,SOMEFAMOUSMUSIC,AND WE HAVETHESIXTEENTHCENTURYTOTHANK the Order of Friars Minor Capuchin, everyone ofFriarsMinorCapuchin,everyone the Order namewas Although theirofficial them. approved butin1528thepope suppressed, first theywere At Assisi. of Francis St. of ideals primitive to the hisfellowFranciscans ciscan, soughttoreturn 1520s whenMatteodaBascio(1495–1552),aFran the in arose order reforming This friars. chin ofCapu theorder surprisingly, deriving from, The word ONE LATTEANDAM came tobeassociatedwithcappuccinos. a Capuchinfriar,weseethebrown hoodwhosecolor HO LD THEWH cappuccino eled by later critics against the dramatic,eled bylatercriticsagainst shaped pearl”—originallyaninsultlev Portuguese the from itselfcame Theword name “Baroque.” century andwaseventuallygiventhe that wouldextendintotheseventeenth architecture and music, art, of ering a flow the arts,andithelpedtouchoff encouragedThe CatholicReformation IF shop order. foryournextcoffee tle background lit a have you Now monkey. of kind itisthenamefora kingdom, where to thedrink—andalsoanimal puccio hoods( their distinctivebrown called themsimply“Capuchins”after I PPED CREAM I T’S REALLYBAR ). Somehow, the name migrated thenamemigrated ). Somehow, is originally an Italian word isoriginallyanItalianword is originally an Italian word isoriginallyanItalianword O NK, PLEASE Inthis17th-c.imageof O barroco QUE…. , or “oddly, cap - - - - - - - Handel, andRembrandttestify. astheexamplesofBach, not immunetothetrend, were and “Picturingsaints,”pp.16–18).Protestants
    [Show full text]
  • Prefatory Materials of the King James Bible
    THE PREFATORY MATERIALS OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE Ý The Translators’ Dedication to King James and their Addresss to the Reader in the King James Bible. 1611 By Matthew Verschuur The Prefatory Materials of the King James Bible First published 2010 Copyright Matthew Verschuur This material has been produced for personal study, ministry teaching and Christian educational purposes. Bible Protector www.bibleprotector.com ¶ Introduction This work was written around 2003/2004. It was later condensed significantly and formed part of the Guide to the Pure Cambridge Edition. It is an initial treatment and attempt to understand the teachings and the references of the King James Bible translators’ scholarship. Since this work was analytical and notational in nature, and represented initial investigations into these details, it must contain various crudities and incomplete assessments. Thus, it must be stressed that this is only a novice study. As the King James Bible went to the press in 1611, a dedication was written by Thomas Bilson, and an admonition to the reader was written by Miles Smith. These two works in combination show the intention of the translators in their work, and explain various principles in their labouring to present of the Word of God. These two works are called “The Epistle Dedicatory” and “The Translators to the Reader”. This work treats both these statements. § I. Notes on The Epistle Dedicatory ¶ 1. Overview of The Epistle Dedicatory The Dedication was written by the 1611 translator, Thomas Bilson. It appeared in the 1611 Edition, and has been retained in Cambridge Bibles ever since. A full and proper Cambridge copy of The Epistle Dedicatory (TED) has been supplied, mainly because of slight differences that can be observed in it in different King James Bibles.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book Ordinary and Canon of the Mass : According to the Use
    ORDINARY AND CANON OF THE MASS : ACCORDING TO THE USE OF THE CHURCH OF SARUM (1872) PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Theodore Dodd | 56 pages | 30 Apr 2009 | Kessinger Publishing Co | 9781104303860 | English | Kila, MT, United States Ordinary And Canon Of The Mass : According To The Use Of The Church Of Sarum (1872) PDF Book Another translation appears in Pearson, The Sarum Missal This is the present rule, according to an order made by pope Pius the fifth []. Tertia est quoniam sicut ex multis granis collectis unus panis effi citur et ex multis racemis vinum eliquatur, sic et ex multis fidelibus quorum quidam boni, quidam mali una ecclesia constituitur et coadunatur. Thus the York use appoints two different arrangements of psalms and prayers ; the Bangor has one only ; and so the Hereford. It has been thought, not only by myself but by not a few eminent churchmen and liturgiologists whom I have consulted, that a translation of the SARUM Ordinary and Canon possibly as the precursor of a complete Sarum Missal in English with rubrical direction as ample and detailed as those in Messrs. Under Edward VI , Protestant pressure for public worship in English resulted in its replacement by successive versions of the Book of Common Prayer in and Back to top Ordering and regulating the liturgy To those who recited the liturgy as part of their daily pattern it will have been very familiar. As with the Office, there were two principal books for the Mass: the Missal for the priest, and the Gradual for those in choir. Liturgy of St.
    [Show full text]