FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 174 Thursday, September 11, 1969 • Washington, D.C. Pages 14265-14310

Agencies in this issue— The President Atomic Energy Commission Business and Defense Services Administration Civil Aeronautics Board Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communications Commission Federal Reserve System Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Indian Affairs Bureau Interior Department International Joint Commission— United States and Canada Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Oil Import Administration Securities and Exchange Com m ission Treasury Department Detailed list of Contents appears inside. MICROFILM EDITION FEDERAL REGISTER 35mm MICROFILM

Complete Set 1936-67,167 Rolls (1,162

Vot. Year Price Voi. Year Price Voi. Year Price 1 1936 $8 12 1947 $26 23 1958 $36 2 1937 10 13 1948 27 24 1959 40 3 1938 9 14 1949 22 25 1960 49 4 1939 14 15 1950 26 26 1961 46 5 1940 15 16 1951 43 27 1962 50 6 1941 20 17 1952 35 28 1963 49 7 1942 35 18 1953 32 29 1964 57 8 1943 52 19 1954 39 30 1965 58 9 1944 42 20 1955 36 31 1966 61 10 1945 43 21 1956 38 32 1967 64 11 1946 42 22 1957 38

Order Microfilm Edition from Publications Sales Branch National Archives and Records Service* Washington, D.C. 20408

/ b l \ Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National FERERAL#REGISTER Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration, Washington, D.O. 20408, pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 15), under regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, ap­ proved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The F ederal R egister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $2.50 per month or $25 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies is 20 cents for each issue, or 20 cents for each group of pages as actually bound. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code o p F ederal Regulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pursuant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended (44 U.S.C. 1510). The Code op F ederal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal Register issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister or the Code op F ederal R egulations. Contents

FEDERAL AVIATION Notices THE PRESIDENT administration Quinault Indian Reservation, PROCLAMATION Washington; notice of accept­ Rules and Regulations ance of retrocession of jurisdic­ National Employ the Physically Airworthiness directives; Beech tion ______14288 Handicapped Week, 1969—'------14269 Models 99 and 99A airplanes— 14280 Control zone; alteration.„ — 14280 EXECUTIVE ORDERS INTERNATIONAL JOINT The Honorable Everett McKinley Control zone and transition area; Dirksen (2 documents) __ 14271,14277 alteration__ ;______14281 COMMISSION—UNITED The President’s Committee on Em­ Transition area; STATES AND CANADA ployment of the Handicapped— 14273 Alteration______;_ 14281 Designation; correction______14281 Notices EXECUTIVE AGENCIES Proposed Rule Making Metropolitan Corporation of Proposed alterations: Greater Winnipeg; postpone­ AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Control zones and transition ment of public hearing_;_____ 14308 See Consumer and Marketing areas (2 documents) — __ 14285 Service. Transition area______14286 INTERSTATE COMMERCE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Notices COMMISSION Notices Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc., and Notices Fourth section applications for New York State Atomic and Canada-U.S.A. television agree­ relief______14297 Space Development Authority; ment modified______14306 Motor carrier: issuance of safeguards amend­ Channel 41, Battle Creek, Mich.; Broker, water carrier and freight ment to provisional operating applications for construction fowarder applications______14288 license______- 14302 p erm it______14306 Trustees of Columbia University Temporary authority applica­ in City of New York; issuance of FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM tions ___ 14297 operating license___ ;______14302 Switching rates in Chicago switch­ Rules and Regulations ing district______;_ 14296 BUSINESS AND DEFENSE Specific functions delegated to Board employees and Federal LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Reserve banks__ —______14279 Notices Notices FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Jackson Laboratory; duty-free Oregon; opening of public lands; entry of scientific articles__ _ 14298 Rules and Regulations correction______14287 Hunting in certain wildlife ref- Wyoming; opening of public CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD uges: lands :______;______14287 Rules and Regulations Arizona and California______14284 Alternate transportation provided Mississippi ____ _.______- _- 14284 OIL IMPORT ADMINISTRATION passengers denied boarding___ 14281 North Dakota (2 documents) — 14283, 14284 Rules and Regulations Notices W ashington______— _ 14284 Hearings, etc. : Oil import regulation; miscellane­ Ceskoslovenske A e r o l i n i e FOOD AND DRUG ous amendments______14283 (CSA) ______14303 Chicago-Baltimore n o n s t o p ADMINISTRATION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE service investigation.______14303 Notices COMMISSION Travel-Air Aviation, Inc., and Drugs for human use; drug ef­ nonpriority mail rates_____ 14303 ficacy implementation <3 docu­ Notices United Air Lines, Inc. (2 ments) -&-VS,___ _L___J— 14299, 14300 documents) ______;_ 14304, 14305 Hearings, etc.: ■ W.A.A.C. (Nigeria) Ltd______14306 Commercial Finance Corpora­ HEALTH/ EDUCATION, AND tion of New Jersey______14308 COMMERCE DEPARTMENT WELFARE DEPARTMENT Federal Oil Co______14308 See Business and Defense Services See Food and Drug Administra­ Liberty Equities Corp.______14309 Administration. tion. Pacific Fidelity Corp______14309 CONSUMER AND MARKETING INDIAN AFFAIRS BUREAU TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT SERVICE Notices See Federal Aviation Administra­ Rules and Regulations Area Administrative Officer, Min­ tion. . Handling limitation: neapolis Area Office; delegation Almonds grown in California.— 14279 of authority———. —_14287 Valencia oranges grown in Cali- TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTERIOR DEPARTMENT fornia ____ 14279 Notices domestic dates produced „or See also Fish and Wildlife Service; Packed in designated part 'of Indian Affairs Bureau; Land Electronic receiving tubes from California; expenses and rate of Management Bureau; Oil Im­ Japan; determination of sales assessments___— ______14280 port Administration. at not less than fair value_____ 14287 14267 14268 CONTENTS List of CFR Parts Affected The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1969, and specifies how they are affected.

3 CFR 7 CFR P roposed R ules: 71 (3 documents)______14285, 14286 P roclamation: 908— — — ___ — — — 14279 3927______14269 981______14279 987______;______— ____ _ 14280 32A CFR Executive Orders: OIA (Ch. X ): 10994 (superseded by 11480) ——— 14273 12 CFR OI Reg. 1...... —...... 14283 11018 (superseded by 11480)_____ 14273 265— ______14279 11479 ______14271 11480 ______14273 14 CFR 50 CFR 11481 ______14277 39-______— ___ — — 14280 32 (5 documents)______- 14283, 14284 71 (4 documents) ______14280, 14281 250______„14281 Presidential Documents

Title 3— THE PRESIDENT Proclamation 3927 NATIONAL EMPLOY THE PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED WEEK, 1969 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation During the past three decades, this Nation, has made great progress in helping handicapped Americans find work. Seven million men and women have overcome disabilities and found a place for themselves in industry, commerce, and the professions. As favorable as are the statistics documenting this achievement, there are still many handicapped persons in need of rehabilitation. Programs are needed which will continue and expand the work which has already been done. Yet even the best programs are not enough if they are not matched by a growth of understanding on the part of employers and the public at large. Misconceptions concerning disability must be supplanted by facts. We must help the physically handicapped not only because it enables them to build better lives, but also because an American who is em­ ployed despite his handicap can help to build a better nation for all of us. NOW, THEREFORE, I, RICHARD NIXON, President of the United States of America, in accordance with the joint resolution of Congress approved August 11,1945 (59 Stat. 530), designating the first full week of October of each year as National Employ the Physically Handicapped Week, do hereby call upon the people of our Nation to observe the week beginning October 5, 1969, for such purpose. During that week I urge all the Governors of States, mayors of cities, and other public officials, as well as leaders of industry, educational and religious groups, labor, civic, veterans’, agricultural, women’s, scientific, professional, and fraternal organizations, and all other inter­ ested organizations and individuals, including the handicapped them­ selves, to participate in this observance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of September, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred sixty-nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America, the one hundred ninety-fourth.

[F.R. Doc. 69-10937; Filed, Sept. 10,1969; 10: 28 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969

THE PRESIDENT 14271

Executive Order 11479 THE HONORABLE EVERETT McKINLEY DIRKSEN As an added mark of respect to the memory of the Honorable Everett McKinley Dirksen, late Minority Leader and Member of the Senate of the United States, it is hereby ordered that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff on all buildings, grounds, and naval vessels of the Federal Government in the metropolitan area of the District of Columbia from the day of death until interment, as the flag will be flown in his home State of Illinois under the provisions of Proclamation 3044 of March 1,1954.

T h e W h it e H ouse, September 8,1969. [F.R. Doc. 60-10940; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; 11:25 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969

THE PRESIDENT 14273

Executive Order 11480 THE PRESIDENT’S COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT OF THE HANDICAPPED By virtue of the authority vested in me as^ President of the United States, and in order to provide for the carrying out of the provisions of the Joint Resolution approved July 11, 1949, ch. 302, 63 Stat. 409, as amended, and the provisions of section 8 of the Vocational Re­ habilitation Act, as amended (29 U.S.C. 38), it is ordered as follows: S ection 1. Establishment and composition of the President's Com­ mittee. (a) There is hereby established the President’s Committee on Employment of the Handicapped (hereinafter referred to as the Com­ mittee or as the President’s Committee). (b) The Committee shall be composed of a Chairman and not more than four Vice Chairmen, who shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the President, and of so many other members as may be appointed thereto from time to time by the Chairman of the Presidents Committee from among persons (including representatives of organi­ zations) who can contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the Committee. Members appointed by the Chairman shall be ap­ pointed for a term of three years and may be reappointed. The Chair­ man of the President’s Committee may at any time terminate the service of any member of the President’s Committee, except any member appointed by the President. (c) The Chairman of the President’s Committee, upon the advice of the Executive Committee (hereinafter provided for), may designate as, or invite to be, associate members of the President’s Committee any heads of Federal departments and agencies which have responsi­ bility for rehabilitation services or promotional activities touching the field of interest of the Committee or which are leading employers of handicapped personnel. (d) Representatives of industry, labor, public and private agencies, and other concerned organizations and individuals may be invited to attend meetings of the Committee. S ec. 2. Fimctions of the Committee. The President’s Committee shall facilitate the development of maximum employment opportuni­ ties for the physically handicapped, mentally retarded, and mentally restored. To this end the Committee shall supply information to em­ ployers, labor unions, and national and international organizations, conduct a program of public education, promote cooperation between organizations and agencies, and enlist the support of Federal officials, State and local officials, Governors’ and local Committees on Employ­ ment of the Handicapped, professional organizations, organized labor, and appropriate international organizations. In carrying out the func­ tions vested in it by section 8 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act, as amended, the Committee shall work closely with the Department of Labor, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, the Veterans Administration, State employment-security agencies, and State voca­ tional rehabilitation agencies. S ec. 3. Executive Committee, (a) There is hereby established the Executive Committee of the President’s Committee on Employment of the Handicapped. The Executive Committee shall be composed of the Chairman of the President’s Committee, who shall also be the Chairman of the Executive Committee, the Vice Chairmen of the President’s Committee, and so many additional members as will pro­ vide an Executive Committee of not less than fifteen and not more than fifty members. The said additional members shall be appointed an­ nually by the Chairman of the President’s Committee, from among the members of the President’s Committee or otherwise. The Chairman of the President’s Committee may at any time terminate the service of any member of the Executive Committee.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14274 THE PRESIDENT (b) The Executive Committee shall advise and assist the Chairman of the President’s Committee in the conduct of the business of the President’s Committee and, as authorized by the President’s Commit­ tee or the Chairman thereof (with due regard for the responsibilities of other Federal agencies), shall study the problems of the handi­ capped in obtaining and retaining suitable employment, invite author­ ities in the various professional, technical, and other pertinent fields to assist in the exploration of those problems, and review and develop plans and projects for promoting the employment of the handicapped. S ec. 4. Advisory Council. There is hereby established the Advisory Council on Employment of the Handicapped, which shall advise the President’s Committee with respect to the responsibilities of the Com­ mittee. The Council shall be composed of the Chairman of the Presi­ dent’s Committee, who shall also be the Chairman of the Council, and of the following-named officers, or their respective alternatives: The Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, the Sec­ retary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of Trans­ portation, the Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs, and the Chairman of the United States Civil Service Commission. S ec. 5. Administrative and incidental matters, (a) The President’s Committee, the Executive Committee, and the Advisory Council shall each meet on call of the Chairman of the President’s Committee at a time and place designated by him. In the case of the President’s Com­ mittee and the Executive Committee, the Chairman shall call at least one meeting and two meetings, respectively, to be held during each calendar year. (b) In the absence of designation by the President, the Chairman of the President’s Committee may from time to time designate a Vice Chairman of the President’s Committee to be one or more of the fol­ lowing-named in the absence of the Chairman: Acting Chairman of the President’s Committee, Acting Chairman of the Executive Com­ mittee, and Acting Chairman of the Advisory Council. The Chairman of the President’s Committee shall from time to time assign other duties to the Vice Chairman thereof. . (c) The Chairman of the President’s Committee shall on behalf of the President direct the President’s Committee and its functions. (d) The Chairman may from time to time prescribe such necessary rules, procedures, and policies relating to the President’s Committee, the Executive Committee? and the Advisory Council, and their affairs, as are not inconsistent with law or with the provisions of this order. (e) The Vice Chairmen shall advise and counsel the Committee and shall represent the Committee on appropriate occasions. (f) All members (including the Chairman and Vice Chairmen) of the President’s Committee, the Executive Committee, and the Ad­ visory Council shall serve without compensation. The Chairman and the Vice Chairmen of the President’s Committee may receive trans­ portation and per diem allowances as authorized by law for persons serving without compensation. (g) Employees of the President’s Committee shall be appointed, subject to law, and shall be directed, bv the Chairman of the Com­ mittee. To such, extent as may be mutually arranged by the Chairman of the Committee and the Secretary of Labor, employees of the Com­ mittee shall be subject to the administrative rules, regulations, and procedures of the Department of Labor.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 THE PRESIDENT 14275 (h) The Department of Labor is requested to make available to the President’s Committee necessary office space and to furnish the Committee, under such arrangements respecting financing as may be appropriate, necessary equipment, supplies, and services. The esti­ mates of appropriations for the operations of the Committee shall be included within the framework of the appropriation structure of the Department of Labor, in such manner as the Director of the Bureau of the Budget may prescribe. The Chairman of the Committee, in cooperation with the Assistant Secretary for Administration of the Department of Labor, shall be responsible for the preparation and justification of the estimates of appropriations for the Committee. S ec. 6. Prior orders; transition, (a) To the extent that this order is inconsistent with any provision of any prior order, or with any provision of any regulation or other measure or disposition, heretofore issued, made, or taken by the President or by any other officer of the executive branch of the Government, this order shall control. Execu­ tive Order No. 10994 of February 14, 1962, and Executive Order No. 11018 of April 27,1962, are hereby superseded. (b) Without further action by the President or the Chairman of the Committee, all members, employees, records, property, funds, and pending business of the President’s Committee on Employment of the Handicapped provided for in Executive Order No. 10994 of Febru­ ary 14,1962, as amended, shall on the date of this order become mem­ bers, employees, records, property, funds and pending business of the Committee established by this order. (c) The tenure of persons as members of the Committee in pursu­ ance of the provisions of section 6(b) of this order, (i), in the case of persons appointed to the predecessor Committee by the President, shall be at the pleasure of the President, and (ii), in the case of other members, shall be for periods equal to their respective unexpired terms under Executive Order No. 10994, as amended, but shall also be subject to the provisions of the last sentence of section 1(b) of ' this order.

T he W hite H ouse, September 9, 1969. [F.R. Doc. 69-10941; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; 11:25 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969

THE PRESIDENT 14277

Executive Order 11481 THE HONORABLE EVERETT McKINLEY DIRKSEN In further respect to the memory of the Honorable Everett McKinley Dirksen, late Minority Leader of the Senate of the United States, I direct that on the day of his interment, September 11, 1969, the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff on all buildings, grounds and naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations.

T h e W hite H ouse, September 10,1969. [F.R. Doc. 69-10942 ; Filed, Sept 10, 1969 ; 11:39 a,m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969

14279 Rules and Regulations

disseminated among handlers of such Title 7— AGRICULTURE Valencia oranges; it is necessary, in Title 12— BANKS AND BANKING order to eff ectuate the declared policy of Chapter II— Federal Reserve System Chapter IX— Consumer and Market­ the act, to make this section effective SUBCHAPTER A— BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF ing Service (Marketing Agreements during the period herein specified; and THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM and Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, compliance with this section will not re­ Nuts), Department of Agriculture quire any special preparation on the part PART 265— RULES REGARDING of persons subject hereto which cannot DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY [Valencia Orange Reg. 293] be completed on or before the effective date hereof. Such committee meeting was Specific Functions Delegated to Board PART 908— V A LEN CIA ORANGES GROWN IN ARIZONA AND DESIG­ held on September 9,1969. Employees and Federal Reserve (b) Order. (1) The respective quan­ Banks NATED PART OF CALIFORNIA tities of Valencia oranges grown in Ari­ 1. Effective immediately, § 265.2(c) is Limitation of Handling zona and designated part of California amended by adding subparagraph (13) which may be handled during the period § 908.593 Valencia Orange Regulation September 12, 1969, through Septem­ and § 265.2(f) is amended by adding sub- 293. paragraph (17), as follows: ber 18,1969, are hereby fixed as follows: (a) Findings. (1) Pursuant to the (1) District 1: 400,000 cartons; § 265.2 Specific functions delegated to marketing agreement, as amended, and (ii) District 2: 404,193 cartons; Board employees and Federal Re­ Order No. 908, as amended (7 CFR Part (iii) District 3: 12,000 cartons. serve Banks. 908), regulating the handling of Valen­ (2) As used in this section, “handler,” * * * * * cia oranges grown in Arizona and desig­ “District 1,” “District 2,” “District 3,” (c) The Director of the Division of nated part of California, effective trader and “carton” have the same meaning as Supervision and Regulation (or in his the applicable provisions of the Agricul­ when used in said amended marketing absence, the Acting Director) is author­ tural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, agreement and order. ized: as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and upon (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. *#*-** the basis of the recommendations and in­ 601-674) formation submitted by the Valencia (13) Under the provisions of §§ 207.2 Orange Administrative Committee, es­ Dated: September 10,1969. (f), 220.2(e), and 221.3(d) of this chap­ tablished under the said amended mar­ P aul A. Nicholson, ter (Regulations G, T, and U, respec­ keting agreement and order, and upon Acting Director, Fruit and Veg­ tively) to approve issuance of the list of other available Information, it is hereby etable Division, Consumer and OTC margin stocks and to add, omit, or found that the limitation of handling of Marketing Service. remove any stock in circumstances indi­ such Valencia oranges, as hereinaftes cating that such change is necessary or [P.R. Doc. 69-10938; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; provided, will tend to effectuate the de­ 11:25 ajn.] appropriate in the public interest. clared policy of the act. * «r * _ * * (2) It is hereby further found that it (f) Each Federal Reserve Bank is is impracticable and contrary to the pub­ PART 981 — ALMONDS GROWN IN authorized, as to member banks or other lic interest to give preliminary notice, CALIFORNIA indicated organizations headquartered in engage in public rule-making procedure, its district: and postpone the effective date of this Expenses of the Almond Control * * * a a section until 30 days after publication Board and Rate of Assessment for hereof in the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. (17) Under the provisions of § 207.1 553) because the time intervening be­ the 1969—70 Crop Year (b) of this chapter (Regulation G), to tween the date when information upon approve applications for termination of Notice was published in the August 23, which this section is based became 1969, issue of the F ederal R egister (34 registration by persons who are regis­ available and the time when this sec­ tered pursuant to § 207.1(a) of this F.R. 13601) regarding proposed expenses chapter. tion must become effective in order to of the Almond Control Board for the effectuate the declared policy of the act 1969—70 crop year and rate of assessment 2a. The purpose of these amendments is insufficient, and a reasonable time is for that crop year, pursuant to §§ 981.80 is to delegate certain functions of the permitted, under the circumstances, for and 981.81 of the marketing agreement, Board relating to administration of preparation for such effective time; and as amended, and Order No. 981 as margin requirements (Regulations G, T, good cause exists for making the pro­ amended (7 CFR Part 981), regulating and U) so far as they apply to securities visions hereof effective as hereinafter the handling of almonds grown in Cali­ traded over the counter., set forth. The committee held an open fornia. The marketing agreement and b. The provisions of section 553~of title meeting during the current week, after order are effective under the Agricultural 5, United States Code, relating to notice giving due notice thereof, to consider Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as and public participation and to deferred supply and market conditions for Valen­ amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). effective dates, were not followed in con­ cia oranges and the need for regulation; The notice afforded interested persons nection with the adoption of this amend­ interested persons were afforded an op­ an opportunity to submit written data, ment, because the rules contained portunity to submit information and views, or arguments with respect to the therein are procedural in nature and ac­ views at this meeting; the recommenda­ proposal. None were submitted within the cordingly do not constitute substantive tion and supporting information for reg­ rules subject to the requirements of such prescribed time. section. ulation during the period specified herein After consideration of all relevant mat­ were promptly submitted to the Depart­ ter presented, including that in the Adopted September 4,1969. ment after such meeting was held; the notice, the information and recommen­ By order of the Board of Governors. provisions of this section, including its dations submitted by the Control Board, and other available information, it is (seal] Robert P. Forrestal, effective time, are identical with the found that the expenses of the Control Assistant Secretary. aforesaid recommendation of the com­ Board and rate of assessment for the Ip-R. Doc. 69-10804; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; mittee, and information concerning such crop year beginning July 1,1969 shall be 8:45 a.m.} provisions and effective time has been as follows:

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14280 RULES AND REGULATIONS

§ 981.319 Expenses of the Control of the Date Administrative Committee can result in unexpected changes in the Board and rate of assessment for and the rate of assessment for the control wheel forces which will allow the the 1969—70 crop year. 1969-76 crop year (which began Au­ pilot’s hands to slide on the control wheel (a) Expenses. Expenses in the amount gust 1, 1969, and ends July 31, 1970), in such a manner as to prevent him from of $90,000 are reasonable and likely to be shall be as follows: reaching the trim system disconnect incurred by the Control Board during the § 987.314 Expenses of die Date Admin­ switch located on the control wheel. As crop year beginning July 1, 1969, for its istrative Committee and rate of part of a continuing program to reduce maintenance and functioning and for assessment for the 1969—70 crop this hazard, the manufacturer has de­ such purposes as the Secretary may, pur­ year. veloped a modification by installing pilot suant to the provisions of this part, deter­ and copilot control wheel handgrips to (a) Expenses. Expenses in the amount eliminate this slipperiness. Beech Service mine to be appropriate. „ of $127,600 are reasonable and likely to (b) Rate of assessment. The rate of Instructions No. 0265-156 covers the in­ be incurred by the Date Administrative stallation of these handgrips. assessment for said crop year, payable by Committee during the 1969-70 crop year each handler in accordance with § 981.81, beginning August 1, 1969, for its main­ Since this condition exists in all model is fixed at 0.085 cent per pound of al­ tenance and functioning and for such airplanes of the same type design, an air­ monds (kernel weight basis). other purposes as the Secretary may, worthiness directive is being issued which It is found that good cause exists for pursuant to the applicable provisions of will require within 25 hours’ time in serv­ not postponing the effective time of this this part, determine to be appropriate. ice after the effective date of this air­ action until 30 days after publication in (b) Rate of assessment. The rate of worthiness directive the installation of the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. 553) in assessment for that crop year which each the control wheel handgrips in accord­ that: (1) The relevant provisions of said handler is required, pursuant to § 987.72, ance with said Service Instructions. marketing agreement and this part re­ to pay to the Date Administrative Com­ Since immediate action is required in quire that the rate of assessment fixed for mittee as his pro rata share of the ex­ the interest of safety, compliance with the a particular crop year shall be applicable penses is fixed at 40 cents per hundred­ notice and public procedure provisions of to all almonds received by handlers for weight on all assessable dates. Assessable the Administrative Procedure Act is not their own accounts during such crop dates are dates which the handler has practical and good cause exists for mak­ year; and (2) the current crop year certified during the crop year as meeting ing this amendment effective in less than began on Jiily 1, 1969, and the rate of the requirements for marketable dates, thirty (30) days. assessment herein fixed will automati­ including the eligible portion of any In consideration of the foregoing and cally apply to all such almonds beginning field-run dates certified and set aside or pursuant to the authority delegated to with that date. disposed of pursuant to § 987.45(f). me by the Administrator (31 F.R. 13697), (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. It is further found that good cause section 39.13 of the Federal Aviation Reg­ 601-674) exists for not postponing the effective ulations is amended by adding the fol­ Dated: September 8,1969. time of this action until 30 days after lowing new airworthiness directive: publication in the F ederal R egister (5 Beech. Applies to Models 99 and 99A (Serial P aul A. N icholson, U.S.C. 553) in that: (1) The relevant Nos. U—1 through. U-134) airplanes. Acting Director, Fruit and Veg­ provisions of said marketing agreement Compliance: Required within the next 25 etable Division, Consumer and and this part require that the rate of hours’ time in service after the effective date Marketing Service. of this airworthiness directive, unless already assessment fixed for a particular crop accomplished. , „ [F.R. Doc. 69-10846; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; year shall be applicable to all dates cer­ To eliminate control wheel slipperiness, ac­ 8:48 a.m.] tified during that crop year as meeting complish the following: the requirements for marketable dates, Install handgrips on both the pilot’s and including the eligible portion of certain copilot’s control wheel in accordance with PART 987— DOMESTIC DATES PRO­ field-run dates; and (2) the current crop Beecl) Service Instructions No. 0265-156, or DUCED OR PACKED IN A DESIG­ year began August 1, 1969, and the rate later Federal Aviation Administration ap­ proved revision, or an equivalent approved by NATED AREA OF CALIFORNIA of assessment herein fixed will automati­ the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing cally apply to all such dates beginning Branch, Federal Aviation Administration, Expenses of the Date Administrative with that date. Central Region. Committee and Rate of Assessment (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. for the 1969—70 Crop Year 601-674) This amendment becomes effective September 11, 1969. Notice was published in the August 27, Dated: September 8, 1969. (Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, Federal Aviation Act ederal egister 1969, issue of the F R (34 P aul A. N icholson, of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423; sec. F.R. 13704) regarding proposed expenses Acting Director, Fruit and Veg­ 6(c) Department of Transportation Act (49 of the Date Administrative Committee etable Division, Consumer and U.S.C. 1655(c)) for the 1969-70 crop year and rate of Marketing Service. assessment for that crop year. This cur­ Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on Sep­ rent action approves such expenses and [F.R. Doc. 69-10847; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; tember 3, 1969. 8:48 a.m.] Edward Marsh, assessment rate, and is pursuant to Director, Central Region. §§ 987.71 and 987.72 of the marketing agreement, as amended, and Order No. [F.R. Doc. 69-10827; Filed Sept. 10, 1969; 987, as amended (7 CFR Part 987). The 8:47 a.m.] amended marketing agreement and order Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND regulate the handling of domestic dates produced or packed in a designated area SPACE [Airspace Docket No. 69-SO-87] of California, and are effective under the PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FED­ Chapter I— Federal Aviation Adminis­ Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act ERAL AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIR­ tration, Department of Transportation of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). SPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS The notice afforded interested persons [Docket No. 69-CB-22-AD; Arndt. 39-839] an opportunity to submit written data, Alteration of Control Zone Views, or arguments on the proposal. PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS None were submitted within the pre­ DIRECTIVES The purpose of this amendment to Part scribed time. 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations After consideration of all relevant Beech Models 99 and 99A Airplanes is to alter the Tuscaloosa, Ala., control matter presented, including that in the Recent investigations have established zone. notice, the information and recommen­ that a potentially hazardous condition The Tuscaloosa control zone is de­ dations submitted by the Date Admin­ exists in the longitudinal control of scribed in § 71471 (34 F.R. 4557). istrative Committee, and other available Beech Models 99 and 99A airplanes. A U.S. Standards for Terminal Instru­ information, it is found that the expenses malfunction or misuse of the trim system ment Procedures (TERPs), issued after

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 14281

extensive consideration and discussion the procedure turn altitudes for Cross­ Gobelet, Colo. with Government agencies concerned and ville Memorial Airport that permits a That airspace extending upward from 700 affected industry groups, are now being substantial reduction in the length and feet above the surface within a 0-mile radius applied to update the criteria for in­ width of the transition area extensions. of Weld County Airport (latitude 40°25'35" strument approach procedures. The Current airspace criteria appropriate to N., longitude 104° 37'45" W.) and within 3.5 miles each side of the Gill VOR 038® and criteria for the designation of controlled IFR departures requires an increase in 218° radials extending from the 6-mile airspace for the protection of these pro- the transition area basic radius circle radius area to 11 miles northeast of the cedures was revised to conform to TERPs from 6 to 6.5 miles and a decrease in the VOR; that airspace extending upward from and achieve increased and efficient uti­ control zone extension of 1J> miles. 1,200 feet above the surface within 10 miles lization of airspace. Since these amendments are minor in northwest and 7 miles southeast of the Gill Because of this revised criteria, it is nature and impose no additional burden VOR 038® and 218° radials, extending from necessary to alter the control zone de­ on the public, notice and public procedure 20 miles northeast to 13 miles southwest scription by increasing the width of the hereon are unnecessary and action is of the VOR. extension predicated on the Tuscaloosa taken herein to amend the descriptions Effective date. This amendment shall VORTAC 061° and 241° radials from 2 accordingly. be effective 0901 G.m.t.» November 13, to 3 miles and increasing the length of In consideration of the foregoing, Part 1969. the extension from 8 miles to 8.5 miles 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Issued hi Los Angeles, Calif., on Au­ northeast of the VORTAC. is amended, effective 0901 Gm.t., Au­ gust 28,1969. In view of the foregoing, notice and gust 28,1969, as hereinafter set forth. Lee E. Warren, public procedure hereon are unnecessary In § 71.171 (34 F.R. 4557>, the Cross­ Acting Director, Western Region. and action is taken herein to amend the ville, Tenn., control zone is amended as description accordingly . [F.R. Doc. 69-10830; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; follows: “* * * to the VORTAC.” is 8:47 a.m.] In consideration of the foregoing, Part deleted and “* * * to 1.5 miles north­ 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations west of the VORTAC.” is substituted is amended, effective immediately, as thiC rcffO’i* [Airspace Docket No. 69-013-23] hereinafter set forth. In §71.181 (34 F.R. 4637), the Cross­ In § 71.171 (34 F.R. 4557), the Tusca­ PART 7T— DESIGNATION OF FED­ ville, Tenn., transition area is amended ERAL AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIR­ loosa, Ala., control zone is amended to to read: read: --'.v.' SPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS T uscaloosa, Ala. That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile Designation of Transition Area Within a 5-mile radius of Van De Graaff radius of the Crossville Memorial Airport Airport (latitude 33*13'10" N„ longitude (latitude 35°57'05" N., longitude 85°Q5'05" Correction 87°36'45" W.); within 3 miles each side of W.); within 2 miles eaeh side of the Cross­ In F.R. Doc. 69-10208 appearing at the Tuscaloosa VORTAC 061° and 241° ville VORTAC 334® radial, extending from page 13698 In the issue of Wednesday, radials, extending from the 5-mile radius the 6.6-mile radius area to the VORTAC; zone to 8.5 miles northeast of the VORTAC. August 27, 1969, the eighth line of the within 3 miles each side of the 063® bearing Jacksonville, m . transition area reading: (Sec. 307(a) Federal Aviation Act of 1958; from the Crossville RBN (latitude 35°58'06" N., longitude 84°59'40" W.), extending from “northwest of the airport, excluding the 49 U.S.C. 1348(a); sec. 6(c) Department of par-” should read “northwest of the air­ Transportation Act; 49 U.S.C. 1655(c) ) the 6.5-mile radius area to 8.5 miles north­ east of the RBN. port; and that airspace”. Issued in East Point, Ga., on August 28, 1969. (See. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1348(a); sec. 6(c) Department of Chapter II— Civil Aeronautics Board Gordon A. Williams, Jr., Transportation Act; 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) Acting Director, Southern Region. Issued in East Point, Ga., on August SUBCHAPTER A— ECONOMIC REGULATIONS [P.R Doc. 69-10828; Piled, Sept. 10» 1969; [Reg. ER-588] 8:47 am.] 28,1969. Gordon A. Williams, Jr., PART 250— PRIORITY RULES, DENIED Acting Director, Southern Region. BOARDING COMPENSATION TAR­ [Airspace Docket No. 69-SO-85] [FJR. Doe. 69-10829; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; IFFS AND REPORTS OF UNACCOM­ 8:47 a.m.] PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FED­ MODATED PASSENGERS ERAL AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIR­ SPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS [Airspace Docket No. 69-WE-64] Alternate Transportation Provided Passengers Dented Boarding Alteration of Control Zone and PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FED­ ERAL AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIR­ Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Transition Area Board at its office in Washington, D.C., SPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS The purpose of this amendment to Part on the 4th day of September 1969. ; 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is Alteration of Transition Area Ih a notice of proposed rule making» to alter the Crossville, Tènn., control dated May 15, 1969 (EDR-164, 34 F.R. zone and transition area. The purpose of this amendment to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ 7915) the Board proposed certain The Crossville control zone is de­ tions is to alter the description of the amendments to Part 250 of the economic scribed in § 71.171 (34F.R.4557) And the regulations. The amendments would re­ Greeley, Colo., transition area. vise the exception to eligibility for de­ transition area is described in § 71.181 The criteria for establishment of <34 F.R. 4637). transition areas has recently been nied boarding compensation where the U-S. Standards for Terminal Instru- changed. Accordingly it is necessary to carrier arranged alternate transporta­ ment Procedures (TERPs), issued after designate a small additional amount of tion for the passenger C§ 250.6(b) ) and extensive consideration and discussion other minor revisions of the rule were 700-foot transition area to protect air­ proposed. with Government agencies concerned and craft executing the VOR approach pro­ affected industry groups, are now being cedure during descent below 1,500 feet Comments have been received pur­ applied to update the criteria for instru­ above the surface. suant to the notice1 and have been given ment approach procedures. The criteria Since this change is minor in nature full consideration. For the reasons here­ for the designation of controlled airspace and imposes no additional burden on any inafter set forth and those announced for the protection of these procedures person, notice and public procedure are was revised to conform to TERPs and unnecessary. 1 From Air West, Delta Air Lines, Eastern achieve increased and efficient utiliza­ Bn view of the foregoing, in § 71.181 (34 Air Lines, Frontier Airlines, Mobawk Airlines, tion of airspace. Pan American World Airways, Trans World F.R. 4637) the description of the Greeley, Airlines, United Air Lines,- Air Wisconsin, Additionally, revised instrument ap­ Colo., transition area is amended to Hub Airlines, East Coast Airlines, and Puerto proach procedures reflect a change in read as follows: Rico International Airlines.

FÉDÉRAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11 ( 1969 No. 174----- 3 14282 RULES AND REGULATIONS

in EDR-164, we have decided to adopt severely inconvenienced by alternate conducting intra-Alaska service exclu­ the proposed rule with modifications, transportation which is provided to an sively, holding a certificate issued by the ánd, except as modified, the tentative airport other than the one at which he Board pursuant to section 401(d) (1) findings set forth in the explanatory planned to arrive, it is equally true that and (2) of the Act, authorizing the statement to the proposed rule aré incor­ the passenger may not be inconvenienced transportation of persons. porated herein by reference and made at all and in fact may even benefit by “Comparable a ir transportation” final. the change. This point is well taken, and means transportation provided by air The comments are addressed chiefly we agree with the suggestion of several carriers or foreign air carriers holding to two proposals for amendment of Part carriers that the rule be modified to al­ certificates of public convenience and 250. The first proposal would have the low a passenger to elect between denied necessity or foreign permits issued by effect of giving an oversold passenger boarding compensation and arrival at the Board. the option of either accepting denied another area airport, since the passen­ “Confirmed reserve space’’'means space boarding compensation or accepting ger, not the carrier, is the best judge on a specific date and on a specific flight “other transportation” arriving at the as to the acceptability of the other air­ and class of service of a carrier which has passenger’s stopover or destination at port. We shall accomplish this modifi­ been requested by a passenger and which specified time. “Other transportation” cation by deleting the definition of the carrier or its agent has verified, by would be other than that provided by “point” and references thereto in § 250.6 appropriate notation on the ticket, as air carriers or foreign air carriers holding (b)3 and adding a definition “airport” to being reserved for the accommodation of certificates or permits. A number of com­ mean “the airport at which the direct the passenger. ments3 object to the proposal and sug­ or connecting flight, on which the pas­ “Stopover” means a deliberate inter­ gest, in effect, that where a carrier ar­ senger holds confirmed reserved space, ruption of a journey by the passenger, ranges alternate transportation for a de­ is planned to arrive or some other air­ scheduled to exceed 4 hours, at a point nied boarding passenger which is pro­ port serving the same metropolitan area between the place of departure and the vided by an FAA-certificated, Part 298 that is served by the former, provided place of destination. air taxi and which arrives at the passen­ that transportation to the other airport “Value of the first remaining flight ger’s stopover or destination within the is accepted (i.e., used) by the passenger.” coupon” means the applicable oneway prescribed time, that the passenger be In addition to the latter modification fare, including any surcharge, less any Ineligible for denied boarding of the rule as proposed, pursuant to car­ applicable discount. compensation. rier suggestions, certain clarifying revi­ 2. Amend § 250.6(b) to read as follows: „We shall not adopt this suggestion. We sions to § 250.6(b)* and to CAB Form 2515 will be made. § 250.6 Exceptions to eligibility for de­ do not feel that a passenger who has re­ nied boarding compensation. served space with a certificated carrier Accordingly, thè Civil Aeronautics should be compelled to accept transpor­ Board amends Part 250 of the Economic * * * * * tation on light aircraft or forfeit his right Regulations (14 CFR Part 250), effective (b) The carrier arranges for compara­ to compensation for denied boarding. October 10,1969, as follows: ble air transportation or for other trans­ Such transportation is clearly dissimilar 1. Amend § 250.1 by revising the defi­portation accepted (i.e., used) by the to that which the passenger purchased nition of “stopover” and adding defini­ passenger, which, at the time either such and the carrier agreed to provide. It tions of “airport” and “comparable air transportation” as follows: arrangement is made, is planned to ar­ should not be offered as alternate trans­ rive at the airport of the passenger’s next portation on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. § 250.1 Definitions. The Board has had complaints about the stopover or, if none, at the airport of his practice of carriers arranging for alter­ For the purposes of this part: destination earlier than, or not later than nate transportation on light aircraft and “Airport” means the airport at which 2 hours after, the time the direct or con­ the comments indicate that similar com­ the direct or connecting flight, on which necting flight, on which confirmed re­ the passenger holds confirmed reserved plaints have been registered with served space is held, is planned to arrive carriers. space, is planned to arrive or some other in the case of interstate and overseas air On the other hand, certain comments airport serving the same metropolitan indicate that in the great majority of area that is served by the former, pro­ transportation, or 4 hours after such cases the services of air taxi operators vided that transportation to the other time in the case of foreign air transpor­ have been both adequate and satisfac­ airport is accepted (i.e., Used) by the tation; or tory. Accordingly, it would appear likely passenger. ***** that a substantial number of passengers “Carrier” means an air carrier, except a helicopter operator or an air carrier 3. Amend the third paragraph of the would elect to avail themselves of this statement following § 250.9 to read as arrangement, rather than take compen­ follows: sation and face substantial delay and 8 United objects to a definition of “point” inconvenience, and the rule so permits. synonymous with airport and urges that it § 250.9 Written explanation of denied The proposed rule also would have be deleted. boarding compensation. required that the alternate transporta­ * Mohawk states tha/t the proposed amend­ ***** ment should be clarified to provide that the In order to qualify for such compensation tion be provided to the airport at which passenger shall be deemed to have accepted the direct or connecting flight, on which “other transportation” if he in fact uses it, a passenger must have complied fully with the passenger holds confirmed reserved and Pan American suggests tha/t the word the carrier’s requirements as to ticketing, space, is planned to arrive. This proposal check-in, and reconfirmation procedures and “for” be placed before “other” to make clear be acceptable for transportation under the was motivated by the fact that alternate that the passenger has a right of acceptance carrier’s tariff. However, a passenger is not transportation had sometimes been pro­ only as to “other transportation.” In addi­ eligible for compensation If (a) the flight for vided to airports other than those at tion we believe that the word “ei/ther” should which the passenger holds confirmed reserved which passengers planned to arrive, a be added between “time” and “such arrange­ space is unable to accommodate him because practice which could cause severe incon­ ment is made” for clarification. Section of Government requisition of space or sub­ venience to passengers. 250.6(b) will be revised to read: “The carrier stitution of equipment of lesser capacity for arranges for comparable air transportation or operational and/or safety reasons; (b) the A number of carriers object to this for other transportation accepted (i.e., used) carrier arranges for comparable air transpor­ proposal. For example, Pan American by the passenger, which, at the time either tation 6 or for other transportation accepted states that while a passenger can be such arrangement is made, is planned to (i.e., used) by the passenger, which, at the arrive * * (Italic words added.) time either such arrangement is made, is 6 TWA suggests that the footnote to item 2 It may be noted that the four air taxi 2 be revised to read: “If any passengers operators filing comments are under the im­ qualified for denied boarding compensation 6 "Comparable air transportation” means pression that under the proposed rule “an were not offered compensation, attach a transportation provided by air carriers or for­ airline could not provide transportation by statement as to the number of such passen­ eign air carriers holding certificates of public air taxi operations." This is not, of course, gers and an explanation of why the offer was convenience and necessity or foreign permits the case. not made.” The italic words have been added. issued by the Board.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 14283 planned to arrive at the airport7 of the pas­ Paragraph (o) ‘'petrochemical plant (ii) Oruáe oil and unfinished oils senger's next stopover or, if none, at the air­ inputs” has been revised to add a new which are imported into the United port* of his destination earlier than, or hot paragraph to make it clear that ASTM States by pipeline, rail, or other means later than 2 hours after, the time the direct standard grade aromatics cannot become of overland transportation from the or connecting flight, on which confirmed! country where they were produced, which reserved space is held, is planned to arrive in qualified petrochemical plant inputs by the case of interstate and overseas air trans­ intentional, unintentional, or in process country in the case of unfinished oils portation, or 4 hours af ter such time in the adulteration. produced from crude oil, liquefied gases, case of foreign air transportation; or (c) the For the allocation period January 1, or natural gas products is also the coun­ passenger is accommodated on the flight for 1969, through December 31, 1969 from try of production of the crude oil, lique­ which he holds confirmed reserved space, but the total amount of oil available for allo­ fied gases, or natural gas products from Is offered accommodations or is seated In a cation in Districts I-IV, approximately which the unfinished oils were processed section of the aircraft other than that speci­ or manufactured, fied in his ticket at no extra charge; Provided, 2,000 b/d of crude oil and unfinished oils That a passenger seated in a section for which were set aside for the Oil Import Appeals (ill) Unfinished oils which are ob­ a lower fore is charged shall he entitled to Board, 10,106 b/d were set aside for allo­ tained by transactions such as sales, an appropriate refund. cations to new or reactivated refinery purchases, or exchanges which are de­ capacity, and 8,310 b/d were set aside for signed to avoid the exclusion specified 4. Amend the facing page of CABallocation to new or reactivated petro­ in subdivision (i) of this paragraph (2), Form 251 as set forth in the Appendix* chemical plants, the latter amounts to be and (Secs. 204(a) and 407 of the Federal Aviation licensed under section 25 of the regula­ (iv) Benzene or toluene or any xylene Act of 1958, as amended (72 Stat. 743, 766; 49 tions. The allocations which have been derived from crude oil, liquefied gases, U.S.C. 1324,1377) ) tentatively issued under section 25 of the or natural gas products which met the Note: This is Amendment No. 1 to Fart 250, regulations have not required all of the distillation specification of the ASTM effective Oct. 17,1967. 10,106 b/d or the 8,310 b/d and, in view standard specifications for that chemical By the Civil Aeronautics Board. of the anticipated requirements of the but which subsequently has been re­ Oil Import Appeals Board, paragraph cycled and mixed with other hydrocar­ [seal! Harold R. Sanderson, (a) of section 10 of the regulations is bons, commingled, or purposely debased. Secretary. amended to increase the amount of crude 3. Section 24 of Oil Import Regula­ [F.R, Doc. 69-10835; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; oil and unfinished oils available to the tion 1 (Revision 5) (33 F.R. 8449), is 8:47 a.m.] • Board by 1,200 b/d from the refinery set amended to read as follows: aside and 879 b/d from the petrochemical plant set aside fbr a total increase of Sec. 24 Aromatics and aliphatic hydro­ 2,079 b/d. carbons. Title 32A— NATIONAL DEFENSE, 1. Paragraph (a) of section 10 of Oil (a) Benzene or toluene or any xylene Import Regulation 1 (Revision 5), (33 derived from crude oil, liquefied gases, APPENDIX FJt. 19178), is amended to read as or natural gas products which meets the follows: distillation specification of the ASTM Chapter X— Oil Import Administra­ See. 10 Allocations—crude and unfin­ standard specifications for that chemical tion, Department of the Interior ished oils— refiners— Districts I—IV* is neither a finished product nor an un­ [Oil Import Reg. 1 (Rev. 5) Arndt. 16] finished oil. However, a mixture of hy­ (a) For the allocation period January drocarbons derived from crude oil, lique­ 01 REG. 1— OIL IMPORT REGULATION 1, 1969, through December 31, 1969, ap­ fied gases, or natural gas products which proximately 4,079 b/d of imports of crude contains benzene, toluene, or xylenes but Miscellaneous Amendments oil and unfinished oils into Districts I-IV does not meet the distillation specifica­ In the Federal Register for November are made available to the Oil Import tion of the ASTM standard specifications 26,1968 (33 F.R. 17631) notice was given Appeals Board. The Administrator shall for any of these chemicals is either a of proposals which, among other things, make, to eligible persons having refinery finished product or an unfinished oil. were addressed to problems in connection capacity in these districts, allocations of (b) Materials which are derived from with petrochemical plant inputs pre­ such imports for the allocation period as crude oil, liquefied gases, or natural gás sented by certain olefinic and parafinie provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of products and which are aliphatic mono­ Materials and to a revision of section 24 this section. olefins or paraffins in the range of “Aroniatics” of Oil Import Regulation 1 2. Paragraph (o) of section 22 of Oil Cs-Cis are unfinished oils or finished (Revision 5) as amended. Import Regulation 1 (Revision 5) (33 products. F.R. 8449), is amended to read as follows: After consideration of the 35 com­ This Amendment 16 shall become ef­ ments received it has been determined Sec. 22 Definitions. that materials which are aliphatic mono­ fective upon its publication in the Fed­ olefins or paraffins in the range C5-C15 eral Register. (0) “Petrochemical plant inputs” Walter J. Hickel, and which are derived from crude oil, means feedstocks charged to a petro­ Secretary of the Interior. liquefied gases, or natural gas products chemical plant. are unfinished oils 6r finished products, August 30, 1969. (1) And include only; - and section 24 is amended to add a new [F.R. Doc. 69-10811; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; paragraph (b) to that effect. Paragraph (1) Crude oil, 8:45 a.m.] (a) of section 24 has been amended as (ii) Unfinished oils (except those un­ Proposed to refer to the distillation spec­ finished oils specifically excluded in sub- ification of the ASTM standard specifi­ paragraph (2) of this paragraph) cations in distinguishing between aro­ produced in Districts I-IV and District V, Title 50— WILDLIFE AND matics which are neither finished prod­ and unfinished oils imported pursuant to ucts or unfinished oils and mixtures of an allocation, aromatics which are finished products or (2) But do not include: FISHERIES unfinished oils. (i) Unfinished oils which are producedChapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries in a petrochemical plant in the manu­ and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife ’ "Airport” means the airport at which the facture o f; petrochemicals and subse­ Service, Department of the Interior direct or connecting flight, on which the quently charged to a unit which is a part passenger holds confirmed reserved space, is of the same petrochemical plant in which PART 32—-HUNTING Planned to arrive or some other airport serv­ they were produced or to any other petro­ ing the same metropolitan area that is served J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife °y the former: Provided, That transpor­ chemical plant which is owned or con­ Refuge, N. Dak. tation to the other airport is accepted (i.e., trolled by the same person who claims used) by the passenger. the initial petrochemical plant inputs The following special regulation is »Ibid. from which the unfinished oils are issued and is effective on date of publi­ »Filed as part of original document. derived, cation in the Federal Register.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14284 RULES AND REGULATIONS

§ 32.32 Special regulations; big game; § 32.32 Special regulations; upland read as follows: * * * California—quail, for individual wildlife refuge areas. game; for individual wildlife refuge October 25, 1969 * * *. areas. North Dakota laude ard North Dakota C F. L , J . CLARK SALYER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Refuge Manager, Imperial J . CLARK SALYER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE National Wildlife Refuge, Public hunting of deer on the J. Clark Yuma, Arte. Salyer National Wildlife Refuge, N. Dak., Public hunting of gray partridge and sharptailed grouse on the J. Clark Salyer S eptember 3,1969. is permitted from 12 noon to sunset No­ National Wildlife Refuge, N. Dak., is per­ vember 7, 1969, and from sunrise to [F.R. Doc. 69-10807; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; mitted from sunrise to sunset Novem­ 8:46 a.m.] sunset November 8, 1969, through No­ ber 17, 1969, through December 14, 1969, vember 16, 1969, only on the area desig­ only on the area designated by signs as nated by signs as open to hunting. This open to hunting. This open area, com­ PART 32— HUNTING open area, comprising 58,400 acres, is prising 58,400 acres of the total refuge delineated on a map available at the Yazoo National Wildlife Refuge, area is delineated on a map available at Mississippi refuge headquarters, Upham N. Dak., the refuge headquarters, Upham, N. Dak. and from the Regional Director, Bureau 58789, and from the Regional Director, In F.R. Doc. 69-9915, appearing on of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Federal Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, page 13475 of the issue for Thursday, Building, Fort Snelling, Twin Cities, Federal Building, Fort Snelling, Twin August 21, 1969, under § 32.32, subpara­ Minn. 55111. Hunting shall be in accord­ Cities, Minn. 55111. Hunting shall be in graph (2) under special conditions ance with all applicable State regulations accordance with all applicable State reg­ should read as follows: covering the hunting of deer subject to ulations covering the hunting of gray (2) Bag limit—One deer of either sex the following conditions: partridge and sharptailed grouse subject during the archery hunt. One buck with (1) All hunters must exhibit their to the following special condition: antlers 4 inches or longer during the gun hunting license, deer tag, game, and vehi­ (1) All hunters must exhibit their hunt. cle contents to Federal and State officers hunting license, game and vehicle con­ C. Edward Carlson, upon request. tents to Federal and State officers upon Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. The provisions of this special regula­ request. tion supplement the regulations which The provisions of this special regula­ September 3,1969. govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas tion supplement the regulations which [F.R. Doc. 69-10808; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas 8:45 am.] generally which are set forth in Title 50, generally which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32, and Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32, and are effective through November 16, 1969. are effective through December 14, 1969. PART 32— HUNTING Robert C. Fields, R obert C. Fields, Conboy Lake National Wildlife Refuge Manager, J. Clark Salyer Refuge Manager, J. Clark Salyer Refuge, Washington National Wildlife Refuge, National Wildlife Refuge, In F.R. Doc. 69-10274, appearing on Upham( N. Dak. Upham, N. Dak. page 13744 of the issue for Thursday, S eptember 4,1969. S eptember 4,1969. August 28, 1969; the special condition [F.R. Doc. 69-10805; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; [F.R. Doc. 69-10806; Filed,...-Sept. 10, 1969; pertaining to pheasant, California Valley 8:45 a.m.] 8:45 a.m.] quail, chukar, and Hungarian partridge should be deleted. T ravis S. R oberts, PART 32— HUNTING PART 32— HUNTING Acting Regional Director, Bu­ J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Imperial National Wildlife Refuge, reau of Sport Fisheries and Refuge, N. Dak. Arizona and California Wildlife, Portland, Oreg. The following special regulation is In F.R. Doc. 69-9751, appearing on S eptember 3,1989. issued and is effective on date of publi­ page 13370 of the issue for Tuesday, [F.R. Doc. 69-10809; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; cation in the F ederal R egister. August 21, 1969, hunting seasons should 8:45 am .]

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14285 Proposed Rule Making

In consideration of the foregoing, the Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avia­ DEPARTMENT OF Federal Aviation Administration pro­ tion Administration, Federal Building, poses to amend Part 71 of the Federal 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, Mo. Aviation Regulations as hereinafter set 64106. All communications received TRANSPORTATION forth: within 45 days after publication of this Federal Aviation Administration (1) In § 71.171 (34 F.R. 4557), the fol­ notice in the F ederal R egister will be lowing control zone is amended to read: considered before action is taken on the [ 14 CFR Part 71 1 proposed amendments. No public hearing Chesterfield (Spirit of St. Louis) , Mo. is contemplated at this time, but arrange­ [Airspace Docket No. 69-CE-83] Within a 5-mile radius of Spirit of Sfc ments for informal conferences with Fed­ Louis Airport (latitude 38°39'35" N., longi­ eral Aviation Administration officials CONTROL ZONE AND TRANSITION tude 90038'45'' W .); within 2y2 miles each may be made by contacting the Regional AREA side of the Maryland Heights, Mo., VORTAC 310° radial, extending from the 5-mile radius Air Traffic Division Chief. Any data, Proposed Alteration zone to 7 miles northwest of the VORTAC; views, or arguments presented during within 2 y2 miles each side of the Maryland such conferences must also be submitted The Federal Aviation Administration Heights VORTAC 243° radial, extending from in writing in accordance with this notice is considering amending Part 71 of the the 5-mile radius zone to 7 miles southwest in order to become part of the record for Federal Aviation Regulations so as to of the VORTAC; and within 2 miles each side consideration. The proposals contained alter the Chesterfield (Spirit of St. of the Spirit of St. Louis Airport ILS localizer in this notice may be changed in the light Louis), Mo., control zone, and the Ches­ west course, extending from the 5-mile radius zone to the OM. This control zone is effective of comments received. terfield, Mo., transition area. during the specific dates and times estab­ A public docket will be available for Interested persons may participate in lished in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The examination by interested persons in the the proposed rule making by submitting effective date and time wUl thereafter be Office of the Regional Counsel, Federal such written data, views, or arguments continuously published in the Airman’s In­ Aviation Administration, Federal Build­ as they may desire. Communications formation Manual. ing, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, should be submitted in triplicate to the (2) In § 71.181 (34 F.R. 4637), the fol­ Mo. 64106. Director, Central Region, Attention: lowing transition area is amended to Since designation of controlled air­ Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avia­ read: space at Fort Dodge, Iowa, the instru­ tion Administration, Federal Building, ment approach procedures for Fort 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, Mo. Chesterfield, Mo. Dodge Municipal Airport have been 64106. All communications received That airspace extending upward from 700 altered. In addition, the criteria for the within 45 days after publication of this feet above the surface within a 9-mile radius designation of control zones and transi­ notice in the F ederal R egister will be of Spirit of St. Louis Airport (latitude 38°39' tion areas have changed. Accordingly, it considered before action is taken on the 35" N., longitude 90°38'45" W.); and within 2 y2 miles each side of the Spirit of St. Louis is necessary to alter the Fort Dodge, proposed amendments. No public hear­ ILS localizer west course, extending from the Iowa, control zone and transition area ing is contemplated at this time, but 9-mile radius area to 8 miles west of the OM, to adequately protect aircraft executing arrangements for informal conferences excluding the portion which overlies the St. the altered approach procedures and to with Federal Aviation Administration Louis, Mo., 700-foot floor transition area. comply with the new control zone and officials may be made by contacting the transition area criteria. Regional Air Traffic Division Chief. Any These amendments are proposed under the authority of section 307(a) of the In consideration of the foregoing, the date,, views, or arguments presented Federal Aviation Administration pro­ during such conferences must also be Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348), and of section 6(c) of the Depart­ poses to amend Pari; 71 of the Federal submitted in writing in accordance with Aviation Regulations as hereinafter set this notice in order to become part of ment of Transportation Act (49 U.S.G. 1655(c)). forth: the record for consideration. The pro­ (1) In § 71.171 (34 F.R. 4557), the fol­ posals contained in this notice may be Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on August lowing control zone is amended to read: changed in the light of comments 25, 19697 F ort Dodge, Iowa received. D aniel E. B arrow, A public docket will be available for Acting Director, Central Region. Within a 5-mile radius of Fort Dodge Municipal Airport (latitude 42°33'05" N., examination by interested persons in the [F.R. Doc. 69-10832; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; longitude 94°11'21" W.). This control zone Office of the Regional Counsel, Federal 8:47 a.m.] is effective during the specific dates and Aviation Administration, Federal Build- times established in advance by a Notice to tog, 601 Bast 12th Street, Kansas City, Airmen. The effective date and time will Mo. 64106. [1 4 CFR Part 71 ] thereafter be continuously published in the Airman’s Information Manual. Since designation of controlled air­ [Airspace Docket No. 69-CE-84] space in the Chesterfield, Mo., terminal (2) In § 71.181 (34 F.R. 4637), thejfol- area, two new instrument approach pro­ CONTROL ZONE AND TRANSITION lowing transition area is amended to cedures have been developed for the AREA read: Spirit of St. Louis Airport, Chesterfield, F ort Dodge, Iowa Mo., utilizing the new ILS system at this Proposed Alteration airport for the approach navigational The Federal Aviation Administration is That airspace extending upward from 700 aid. in addition, the criteria for the feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius considering amending Part 71 of the Fed­ of Fort Dodge Municipal Airport (latitude designation of obntrol zones and transi­ eral Aviation Regulations so as to alter 42°33'05" N., longitude 94°11'21" W.); that tion areas have changed. Accordingly, it the control zone and transition area at airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet is necessary to alter the Chesterfield Fort Dodge, Iowa. above the surface within a 14-mile radius (Spirit of St. Louis), Mo., control zone Interested persons may participate in of Fort Dodge VOR, extending from the Fort and the Chesterfield transition area to Dodge VOR 261° radial clockwise to the Fort the proposed rule making by submitting Dodge VOR 055° radial; within a 25-mile adequately protect aircraft executing the such written data, views, or arguments new approach procedures and to comply radius of Fort Dodge VOR, extending from as they may desire. Communications the Fort Dodge VOR 0550 radial clockwise to with the new control zone and transition should be submitted in triplicate to the the Port Dodge VOR 261° radial; within 4 y2 area criteria. Director, Central Region, Attention: miles southwest and 9% miles northeast of

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEM BE R 1 1 , 1969 14286 PROPOSED RULE MAKING the Fort Dodge VOR 127° radial, extending 12th Street, Kansas City, Mo. 64106. All of Rochester Municipal Airport (latitude from the 25-mile radius area to 32 miles communications received within 45 days 43°54'25" N., longitude 92°29'45'' W .); within southeast of the VOR; and within 4 % miles after publication of this notice in the 2% miles each side of the Rochester VOR northeast and 9% miles southwest of the 029° radial, etxendlng from the VOR to 23 Fort Dodge VOR 307° radial, extending freon F ederal R egister will be considered be­ miles northeast of the VOR; within 3 miles the 14-mile radius area to 18% miles north­ fore action is taken on the proposed each side of the Rochester ILS localizer west of the VOR; and that airspace extend­ amendment. No public hearing is con­ northwest course, etending from the 7-mile ing upward from 3,500 feet MSL south and templated at this time, but arrangements radius area to 19 miles northwest of the OM; east of Fort Dodge bounded on the north by for informal conferences with Federal and within 4% miles southwest and 9% V—100, on the east by V-13, on the south by Aviation Administration officials may be miles northeast of the Rochester ILS local­ V-172 and on the northwest by V-138. made by contacting the Regional Air izer southeast course, extending from 3 miles northwest to 18% miles southeast of the OM; These amendments are proposed un­ Traffic Division Chief. Any data, views, and that airspace extending upward from der the authority of section 307 (a) of the or arguments presented during such con­ 1,200 feet above the surface within a 22% - Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. ferences must also be submitted in writ­ mile radius of Rochester VOR, extending 1348), and of section 6(c) of the Depart­ ing in accordance with this notice in or­ clockwise from V-24 southeast of Rochester ment of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. der to become part of the record for con­ to V-82 northwest of Rochester; the airspace 1655(c)). sideration. The proposal contained in north and east of Rochester bounded on the this notice may be changed in the light west by the west edge of V-82, on the north­ Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on August west by the arc of a 36-mile radius circle of comments received. centered on the Minneapolis-St. Paul Inter­ 25, 1969. A public docket will be available for D aniel E. B arrow, national Airport (latitude 44°53'05" N., lon­ examination by interested persons in the gitude 93°13'15" W.), on the northeast by Acting Director, Central Region. Office of the Regional Counsel, Federal V-2 and on the south by V-82; within 5 [F.R. Doc. 09-10833; Filed, Sept. 10, I960; Aviation Administration, Federal Build­ miles west and 7 miles east of the Rochester 8:47 am.] ing, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, VOR 173° radial, extending from the 22%- Mo. 64106. mile radius area to 38 miles south of the VOR; and within 5 miles south and 7 miles I 14 GFR Part 71 1 The localizer, back course instrument approach procedure for Runway 13 at north of the Rochester VOR 104° radial, [ Airspace Docket No. 69-Œ -81 ] extending from 22% miles to 45 miles east Rochester, Minn., Municipal Airport, has of the VOR, excluding the portions that over- TRANSITION AREA been modified by adding a DME arc. Ac­ lie the Winona and Fairbault-Owatonna, Proposed Alteration cordingly, it is necessary to alter the Minn , transition areas. Rochester, Minn., transition area to ade­ The Federal Aviation Administration quately protect. aircraft executing the This amendment is proposed under is considering amending Part 71 of the modified approach procedure. the authority of section 307(a) of the Federal Aviation Regulations so as to al­ In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. ter the transition area at Rochester, Federal Aviation Administration pro­ 1348), and of section 6(c) of the Depart­ Minn. poses to amend Part 71 of the Federal ment of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. Interested persons may participate In Aviation Regulations as hereinafter set 1655(c)). the proposed rule making by submitting forth: Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on Au­ such written data, views, or arguments as In § 71.181 (34 FJR. 4637), the follow­ gust 25,1969. they may desire. Communications should ing transition area is amended to read: be submitted in triplicate to the Direc­ D aniel E. B arrow, tor, Central Region, Attention: Chief, Rochester, M om . Acting Director, Central Region. Air Traffic Division, Federal Aviation Ad­ That airspace extending upward from 700 [F.R. Doc. 69-10634; Filed, Sept. 10, 1009; ministration, Federal Building, 601 East feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius 8:47 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 174-—THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14287 Notices

2. In the absence of the Area Director, T. 19 N., R. 101 W., DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY the Assistant Area Director, and the Area Sec. 36, SW&NW^, N^SW^, and Administrative Officer, persons author­ NW}4SEi4. Office of the Secretary T, 20 N., JR. 101 W., ized to act in their stead may exercise Sec 36. ELECTRONIC RECEIVING TUBES any and all authority conferred upon the T. 13 N.( R. 102 W., FROM JAPAN Area Director by the Commissioner of Sec. 36. Indian Affairs. T. 15 N., R. 105 W., Determination of Sales at Not Less 3. Delegation of authority included Sec. 16, SW& and NW&SEft. Than Fair Value herein is not construed as depriving the T. 23 N., R. 105 W., Area Director of the authority conferred Sec. 16, N»/2NEi4. August 27,1969. T. 25 N., R. 105 W., upon him by the Commissioner of Indian Sec. 36, Si/2NWV4, SE^SW ^, and SE]4. On March 4, 1969, there was published Affairs. ~ T. 18 N., R. 106 W., in the Federal Register a “Notice of 4. The effective date of this delegation Sec. 16, S%SW& and SE14. Tentative Negative Determination,” that will be the date of signature by the Area T. 20 N., R. 106 W., electronic receiving tubes (except tele­ Director. Sec. 36. vision picture tubes) from Japan are not T. 21 N., R. 106 W., being sold at less than fair value within Dated: August 29,1969. Secs. 16 and 36. T. 22 N., R. 106 W., the meaning of section 201 (a) of the An­ Owen D. Morken, Sec. 36. tidumping Act, 1921, as amended (19 Area Director, Bureau of Indian T. 21 N., R. 107 W., U.S.C. 160(a)). Affairs, Minneapolis Area Sec. 16. The statement of reasons for the ten­ Office, Minneapolis, Minn. T. 16 N., R. 108 W., tative determination was published in the Sec. 16, Ny2. above-mentioned notice and interested Approved: September 4,1969. , T. 27 N., R. 108 W., parties were afforded until April 3, 1969, T. W. Taylor, Sec. 16. to make written submissions or requests Acting Commissioner T. 18 N., R. 109 W., for an opportunity to present views in Sec. 36. of Indian Affairs. T. 19 N„ R. 109 W., connection with the tentative determina­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10810; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; Sec. 36, E%SE}4. tion. 8:45 am.] The attorney for the complainant sub­ T. 22 N., R. 109 W., Sec. 36, S1/2NE14, NE^SW^, and sy2SW%. mitted a written request for an oppor­ T. 25 N., R. 109 W., tunity to present views in person in Bureau of Land Management Sec. 16, SE14SW14 and SE]4. opposition to the tentative determina­ [OR 3047] T. 23 N., R. 110 W., tion. The opportunity was afforded to the Sec. 16, NE14. attorney, and all interested parties of OREGON T. 24 N., R. 110 W., record were notified. All oral and written Sec. 16. materials submitted have received care­ Order Providing for Opening of T. 25 N„ R. 110 W., ful consideration. Public Lands Secs. 16 and 36. I hereby determine that, for the rea­ Correction T. 26 N., R. HOW., sons stated in the tentative determina­ Sec. 16. tion, electronic receiving tubes (except In F.R. Doc. 69-10042 appearing at T. 32 N., R. 110 W., television picture tubes) imported from page 13617 in the issue of Saturday, Au­ Sec. 36. Japan are not being, nor likely to be, sold gust 23, 1969, on page 13618 under “T. T. 33 N., R. 110 W., at less than fair value within the mean­ 21 S., R. 19 E„” in Sec. 14 the third line Sec. 36. ing of section 201 (a) of the Antidumping should read “SEy4, and SW?4SE%, ex­ T. 24 N., R. I ll W., Act, 1921, as amended (19 U.S.C. 160(a) ). cepting there—”. Sec. 36, Ny2 and NW^SW1^. This determination is published pur­ T. 16 N., R. 112 W., suant to section 201 (c) of the Antidump­ . Sec. 36, NE^NEi/4 and Sy2, ing Act, 1921, as amended (19 U.S.C. [Wyoming 20930}- T. 22 N., R. 112 W., 160(c)). WYOMING Sec. 36, Sy2SE%. T. 20 N., R. 114 W., [seal] Eugene T. Rossides, Order Providing for Opening of Sec. 36, SW14SE14 and E^SE^. Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. Public Lands T. 22 N., R. 114 W., (PR. Doc. 69-10826; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; Sec. 16. 8:46 a.m.] S eptember 5,1969. T 23 N., R. 114 W., 1. In exchanges of lands made under Sec. 16, wy2SWi4, SE14SW14, and SE14; the provisions of section 8 of the Act of Sec. 36. T. 16 N„ R. 115 W., departm ent o f t h e in t e r io r June 28,1934 (48 Stat. 1269) as amended Sec. 21, lot 6. Bureau of Indian Affairs (43 U.S.C. 315g), the following described T. 17 N., R. 115 W., lands have been reconveyed to the United Sec. 16. AREA ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, States: T. 18 N., R. 115 W., MINNEAPOLIS AREA OFFICE Sec. 36. Sixth Principal Meridian T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Redelegation of Authority T. 13 N., R. 99 W., Sec. 16, Wy2NWi4 and Sy2. 1. The Area Administrative Officer, Sec. 36, Sy2SWi4 and SE&. T. 20 N., R. 99 W., The areas described aggregate 17,206.- Bureau of Indian Affairs, Minneapolis Sec. 16. 89 acres. Ar®a ^.®ce> Minneapolis, Minn., is hereby T. 22 N„ R. 99 W., 2. The lands are located in Lincoln, j^hnnized to exercise all the power and Sec. 36, S&NW%, N ^SW ^, and SW}4 Sublette, Sweetwater, and Uinta coun­ authority of the Area Director of the sw>/4. ties. The topography ranges from nearly lnneaP°lis Area Office as delegated by T. 21 N.,R. 100 W., level to rough, and the lands have values ne Commissioner of Indian Affairs in Sec. 36, Ni/2. for watershed, grazing, wildlife and une with Secretarial Order No. 2508 and T. 22 N., R. 100 W., recreation which can best be managed as Provided in 10 BIAM 3. Sec. 16, E%NW}4. under principles of multiple use.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14288 NOTICES

3. The United States acquired miner­ lished in the F ederal R egister issue of No. MC 2567 (Sub-No. 13), filed Au­ als in the land in T. 16 N., R. 115 W., April 20, 1966, effective May 20, 1966. gust 11, 1969. Applicant: BELBEY only. The United States did not acquire These rules provide, among other things, TRANSFER COMPANY, a corporation, minerals in all other lands described that a protest to the granting of an appli­ 520 Belleville Turnpike, Kearney, N.J. herein. cation must be filed with the Commission 07032. Applicant’s representative: Bert 4. Subject to valid existing rights, the within 30 days after date of notice of Collins, 140 Cedar Street, New York, N.Y. provisions of existing withdrawals, and filing of the application is published in 10006. Authority sought to operate as a the requirements of applicable law, the the F ederal R egister. Failure seasonably common carrier, by motor vehicle, over lands will at 10 a.m. on October 10, 1969 to file a protest will be construed as a irregular routes, transporting: Elevators, be open to application, petition, and se­ waiver of opposition and participation in escalators, and parts thereof, and equip­ lection under the public land laws except the proceeding. A protest under these ment, material and supplies used or use­ that all the lands are subject to multiple- rules should comply with section 247(d) ful in the manufacture, installation and use classification W-5697 or W-12668 (3) of the rules of practice which requires maintenance of elevators and escalators and are not open to application under the that it set forth specifically the grounds and parts thereof, between the plantsite agricultural land laws (43 U.S.C., Parts 7 upon which it is made, contain a de­ of Otis Elevator Co., London, Ohio, and and 9; 25 U.S.C. sec. 334), or to public tailed statement of protestant’s interest points within 5 miles thereof, on the one sale under section 2455 of the Revised in the proceeding (including a copy of hand, and on the other, the plantsite of Statutes (43 U.S.C. 1171). The land in the specific portions of its authority Otis Elevator Co., Bloomington, Ind., and T. 16 N., R. 115 W., will also be open to which protestant believes to be in con­ points in New Jersey, Connecticut, Dela­ location under the U.S. mining laws. All flict with that sought in the application, ware, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode valid applications received at or prior to and describing in detail the method— Island, Massachusetts, Maryland, and 10 a.m. on October 10,1969, shall be con­ whether by joinder, interline, or other Washington, D.C., commercial zone. sidered as simultaneously filed at that means—by which protestant would use N ote: Applicant states it does not intend time. Those received thereafter shall be such authority to provide all or part of to tack, and is apparently willing to ac­ considered in the order of filing. the service proposed), and shall specify cept a restriction against tacking, if 5. Inquiries concerning the lands with particularity the facts, matters, and warranted. If a hearing is deemed nec­ should be addressed to the Bureau of things relied upon, but shall not include essary, applicant requests it be held at Land Management, Post Office Box 1828, issues or allegations phrased generally. New York, N.Y. Cheyenne, Wyo. 82001. Protests not in reasonable compliance No. MC 29120 (Sub-No. 109), filed Au­ with the requirements of the rules may gust 11, 1969, Applicant: ALL-AMERI­ Daniel P. Baker, be rejected. The original and one copy of CAN TRANSPORT, INC., 1500 Industrial State Director. the protest shall be filed with the Com­ Avenue, Sioux Falls, S. Dak. 57101. Ap­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10825; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; mission, and a copy shall be served con­ plicant’s representative: H. Lauren 8:45 a.m.] currently upon applicant’s representa­ Lewis (same address as applicant). Au­ tive, or applicant if no representative is thority sought to operate as a common named. If the protest includes a request carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Office of the Secretary for oral hearing, such requests shall meet routes, transporting: (1) Oils, greases, QUINAULT INDIAN RESERVATION the requirements of § 247(d) (4) of the petroleum products, antifreeze, dispens­ special rules, and shall include the certi­ ers, and related articles, from Spencer, Notice of Acceptance of Retrocession fication required therein. Iowa, and Omaha, Nebr., to points in of Jurisdiction Section 247(f) of the Commission’s Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, rules of practice further provides that Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, and (2) Pursuant to the authority vested in the each applicant shall, if protests to its ap­ containers, additives, materials and sup­ Secretary of the Interior by Executive plication have been filed, and within 60 plies used in the manufacture, produc­ Order No. 11435 (33 P.R. 17339), I hereby days of the date of this publication, tion, and sale of oils, greases, petroleum accept, as of 12:01 a.m., e.s.t., of the day notify the Commission in writing (1) products, antifreeze, dispensers and re­ following publication of this notice in the that it is ready to proceed and prosecute lated articles, from points in Illinois, In­ F ederal R egister, retrocession to the the application, or (2) that it wishes diana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, United States of all jurisdiction exercised to withdraw the application, failure in Ohio, and Wisconsin to Spencer, Iowa, by the State of Washington over the which the application will be dismissed and Omaha, Nebr. N ote: Common con­ Quinault Indian Reservation, except as by the Commission. trol may be involved. Applicant states it provided under Chapter 36, Laws of Further processing steps (whether does not intend to tack, and is apparently 1963 (RCW 37.12.010-37.12.060), as of­ modified procedure, oral hearing, or willing to accept a restriction against fered on August 15, 1968, by proclama­ other procedures) will be determined tacking, if warranted. If a hearing is tion of the Governor of the State of generally in accordance with the Com­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it Washington. mission’s General Policy Statement Con­ be held at Sioux Falls, S. Dak. Walter J. H ickel, cerning Motor Carrier Licensing Proce­ No. MC 35334 (Sub-No. 70), filed Au­ Secretary of the Interior. dures, published in the F ederal R egister gust 15, 1969. Applicant: COOPER-JAR- issue of May 3, 1966. This assignment RETT, INC., 23 South Essex Avenue, August 30, 1969. will be by Commission order which will Orange, N.J. 07051. Applicant’s repre­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10812; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; be served on each party of record. sentative: Irving Klein, 280 Broadway, 8:45 a.m.] The publications hereinafter set forth New York, N.Y. 10007. Authority sought reflect the scope of the applications as to operate as a common carrier, by filed by applicants, and may include de­ motor vehicle, over regular and irregular scriptions, restrictions, or limitations routes, transporting: I. Regular routes: INTERSTATE COMMERCE which are not in a form acceptable to General commodities (except those of the Commission. Authority * which ulti­ unusual value, classes A and B explo­ COMMISSION mately may be granted as a result of the sives, household goods as defined by the [Notice 1329] applications here noticed will not neces­ Commission, commodities in bulk, and sarily reflect the phraseology set forth in commodities requiring special equip­ MOTOR CARRIER, BROKER, WATER ment), (1) between Wallingford, New CARRIER AND FREIGHT FOR­ the application as filed, but also will Haven, Bridgeport, Conn., and the junc­ WARDER APPLICATIONS eliminate any restrictions which are not tion of Interstate Highways 79 and 80 acceptable to the Commission. at or near Mercer, Pa.: (a) From Wal­ September 5,1969. lingford over Connecticut Highway 70 The following applications are gov­ 1 Copies of Special Rule 247 (as amended) to the junction of Interstate Highway erned by Special Rule 1.2471 of the Com­ can be obtained by writing to the Secretary, 84, thence over Interstate Highway 84 to mission’s general rules of practice (49 Interstate Commerce Commission, Washing­ junction of Interstate Highway 81E, CFR Part 1100.247 as amended), pub­ ton, D.C. 20423. thence over Interstate Highway 8 IE to

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTICES 14289 the junction of Interstate Highway 80, state Highway 80S, thence over Inter­ 80S to the junction of Interstate Highway thence over Interstate Highway 80 to state Highway 80S to junction Interstate 77, thence over Interstate Highway 77 to the junction of Interstate Highway 79 at Highway 71, thence Over Interstate High­ junction of Interstate Highway 70, thence or near Mercer, Pa., and return over way 71 to Columbus and return over the over Interstate Highway 70 to Zanesville the same routes; (b) from New Haven same routes; (9) between junction In­ and return over the same routes; serving over Interstate Highway 91 to the junc­ terstate Highways 79 and 80 and Day- in conjunction with the routes described tion of Connecticut Highway 70, thence ton, Ohio: From junction Interstate immediately above in (1) through (15) to the junction of Interstate Highways Highways 79 and 80 to Columbus as de­ all intermediate and off-route points in 79 and 80 as described above in (1) (a), scribed above in (8) and thence over the following Ohio counties: Ashtabula, and return over the same routes; and Interstate 70 to junction Ohio Highway Trumbull, Columbiana, Jefferson, Lake, (c) from Bridgeport over Interstate 69, thence over Ohio Highway 69 to Day- Richland, Seneca, Lucas, Fulton, Aug­ Highway 95 to the junction of Interstate ton, and return over the same route; laize, Van Wert, Geauga, Portage, Stark, Highway 91 at New Haven, thence to the (10) Between Junction Interstate Tuscarawas, Carroll, Morrow, Marion, junction of Interstate Highways 79 and Highways 79 and 80 and Cincinnati, Wood, Henry, Williams, Mercer, Cuya­ 80 as described in (1) (a) above, and re­ Ohio: From junction Interstate High­ hoga, Summit, Medina, Wayne, Holmes, turn over the same routes. ways 79 and 80 to Columbus as described Ottawa, Crawford, Hancock, Putman, (2) Between New York, N.Y., and the in (8) above and thence over Interstate Defiance, Lorain, Ashland, Knox, Erie, junction of Interstate Highways 79 and Highway 71 to Cincinnati and return Huron, Sandusky, Wyandot, Hardin, 80 at or near Mercer, Pa.: From New over the same route; serving in conjunc­ Allen, and Paulding. York, N.Y., over Interstate Highway 95 tion with the routes described imme­ n . Irregular route: General commodi­ over the George Washington Bridge to diately above in (8), (9), and (10) all in­ ties (except those of unusual value, the junction of Interstate Highway 80, termediate and off-route points in the classes A and B explosives, household thence over Interstate Highway 80 to the following Ohio counties: Columbiana, goods as defined by the Commission, junction of Interstate Highway 79 at Jefferson, Carroll, Harrison, Belmont, commodities in bulk, and commodities or near Mercer, Pa., and return over the Monroe, Tuscarawas, Guernsey, Noble, requiring special equipment) between same route; (3) between Jersey City, Washington, Champaign, Clark, Greene, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the one hand, N.J., and the junction of Interstate Clinton, Brown, Holmes, Coshocton, and, on the other, points in Kentucky, Highways 79 and 80 at or near Mercer, Muskingum, Morgan, Athens, Meigs, restricted against the transportation Pa.: From Jersey City over Interstate Gallia, Knox, Licking, Fairfield, Allen, of shipments originating at, destined Highway 78 to junction Interstate High­ Auglaize, Shelby, Miami, Montgomery, to, or interlined at Cincinnati, Ohio, way 95, thence over Interstate Highway Perry, Hocking, Vinton, Jackson, Law­ and points in its commercial zone 95 to the junction of Interstate High­ rence, Morrow, Delaware, Union, Madi­ as defined by the Commission, and re­ way 80, thence over Interstate Highway son, Franklin, Warren, Clermont, Van stricted to the transportation of ship­ 80 to the junction of Interstate Highway Wert, Mercer, Darke, Pickaway, Toss, ments moving from, to, or through the 79 at or near Mercer, Pa., and return Pike, Scioto, Marion, Fayette, Highland, over the same route; (4) between junction of Interstate Highways 79 and Adams, Hardin, Logan, Preble, Butler, 80 at or near Mercer, Pa. Note : The pur­ Philadelphia, Pa., and the junction of and Hamilton; (11) between the junction pose of this application is to enable ap­ Interstate Highways 79 and 80 at or of Interstate Highways 79 and 80 and plicant to use new Interstate super high­ near Mercer, Pa.: From Philadelphia Toledo, Ohio: From the junction of In­ ways through Connecticut, New York, over the northeast exit of the Penn­ terstate Highways 79 and 80 over Inter­ New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and sylvania Turnpike to the junction of state Highway 80 to the junction of In­ Maryland, between terminal points in the Interstate Highway 80, thence over terstate Highway 280, thence over Inter­ East on the one hand, and points in Ohio Interstate Highway 80 to the junction state Highway 280 to Toledo and return on the other. In order to use these high­ of Interstate Highway 79 at or near over the same routes; (12) between the ways, it is necessary, that applicant ob­ Mercer, Pa., and return over the same junction of Interstate Highways 79 and tain an additional gateway to operate be­ route: (5) Between Baltimore, Md„ and 80 and Bucyrus, Ohio; From the junction tween the eastern points, and points in the Junction of Interstate Highways 79 of Interstate Highways 79 and 80 over Ohio. The additional gateway would be and 80 at or near Mercer, Pa.: From Interstate Highway 80 to the junction at the junction of Interstate Highways 79 Baltimore over Interstate Highway 70N Interstate Highway 80S, thence over In­ and 80, at or near Mercer, Pa. Applicant to junction Interstate Highway 70, terstate Highway 80S to the junction of will also require this new junction gate­ thence over Interstate Highway 70 to Interstate Highway 71, thence over In­ way in connection with operations to and junction Interstate Highway 80S, thence terstate Highway 71 to junction U.S. from Kentucky, moving the Cincinnati over Interstate Highway 80S to junction Highway 30, thence over U.S. Highway gateway, authorized to applicant in Interstate Highway 79, thence over 30 to the junction of U.S. Highway 30N, Docket No. MC-35334 (Sub-No. 66). No Interstate Highway 79 to junction Inter­ thence over U S. Highway 30N to Bucy­ new service will result. Applicant is pres­ state Highway 80 at or near Mercer, Pa., rus and return over the same route; and return over the same routes; ently a substantial competitor for traf­ (13) Between the junction of Inter­ fic to and from the areas which it is . (6) Between Pittsburgh, Pa., and the state Highways 79 and 80 and Cleveland, authorized to serve, and is presently junction of Interstate Highways 79 and Ohio: From the junction of Interstate operating in good faith through its au­ 80 at or near Mercer, Pa.: From Pitts­ Highways 79 and 80 over Interstate thorized gateways. It intends to prove by burgh over Interstate Highway 79 to Highway 80 to the junction of U.S. High­ documentary evidence that it is a sub­ junction Interstate Highway 80 at or way 422, thence over U.S. Highway 422 to stantial carrier of general commodities, near Mercer, Pa., and return over the Cleveland and return over the same that no new service will result, and that same routes; (7) between Buffalo, N.Y., route; (14) between the junction of In­ it is operating in good faith through its and the junction of Interstate Highways terstate Highways 79 and 80 and Kent, presently authorized gateways. Applicant 79 and 80 at or near Mercer, Pa.: From Ohio: From the junction of Interstate states it intends to tack the irregular Buffalo over Interstate Highway 90 to Highways 79 and 80 over Interstate route authority sought herein with the Jhe junction of Interstate Highway 79, Highway 80 to the junction of Interstate additional gateway involved so as to pro­ thence over Interstate Highway 79 to Highway 80S, thence over Interstate vide service over the super highway the junction of Interstate Highway 80 at Highway 80S to the junction of Ohio routes over which it seeks to operate. or near Mercer, Pa., and return over the Highway 43, thence over Ohio Highway Common control may be involved. If a same routes; serving no intermediate 43 to Kent and return over the same hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Points in conjunction with the above- route; and (15) between Junction Inter­ requests it be held at Washington, oescribed routes in (1) through (7); (8) state Highways 79 and 80 and Zanesville, D.C., or New York, N.Y. between junction Interstate Highways 79 Ohio: From the junction of Interstate nd 80 and Columbus, Ohio: From junc- No. MC 36556 (Sub-No. 19), filed Au­ Highways 79 and 80 over Interstate High­ gust 15, 1969; Applicant: HOWARD E. w Interstate Highways 79 and 80 over way 80 to the junction of Interstate High­ interstate Highway 80 to junction Inter­ BLACKMON, doing business as HOW­ way 80S thence over Interstate Highway ARD BLACKMON TRUCK SERVICE

No. 174------4 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,1969 14290 NOTICES

Post Office Box 186, Somers, Wis, 53171. FREIGHT LINES, INC., Post Office Box North Dakota, and South Dakota. N ote: Applicant’s representative: Earle Mun- 612, Winston-Salem, N.C. 27102. Appli­ Applicant states that the requested au­ ger, 520 58th Street, Kenosha, Wis. cant’s representative: B. M. Shirley, Jr. thority cannot be tacked with its existing 53140. Authority sought to operate as a (same address as above). Authority authority. If a hearing is deemed neces­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over sought to operate as a common carrier,~ sary, applicant requests it be held at irregular routes, transporting: Empty by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Kansas City, Mo. containers and container parts, from transporting: (1) Cream, or liquid sub­ No. MC 94265 (Sub-No. 224), filed Au­ Oconomowoc and Waupun, Wis., to stitutes, plain, sweetened or flavored, in gust 14, 1969. Applicant: BONNEY points in Ivory dale, Ohio; and empty hermetically sealed containers, and (2) MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., Post Office pallets and shrouds, and damaged or re­ sauces, dressing, salad, other than dry, Box 12388, Thomas Corner Station, Nor­ jected shipments on return. N ote: Ap­ from Washington Court House, Ohio, to folk, Va. 23502. Applicant’s representa­ plicant states that the requested au­ points in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, tive: Harry C. Ames, Jr., 705 McLach- thority cannot be tacked with its ex­ Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, len Bank Building, 666 11th Street NW., isting authority. If a hearing is deemed South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. 20001. Authority sought necessary, applicant requests it be held West Virginia. N ote: Common control to operate as a common carrier, by motor at Milwaukee, Wis., or Chicago, 111. may be involved. Applicant states that vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 52657 (Sub-No. 664) (Cor­ the requested authority cannot be tacked ing: Frozen foods, from Schaumburg, 111., rection) , filed July 22, 1869, published in with its existing authority. If a hearing to points in the States of Maryland, New the F ederal R egister issue of August 28, is deemed necessary, applicant requests it Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Penn­ 1969, and republished as corrected, be held at Washington, D.C. sylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, and this issue. Applicant: ARCO AUTO No. MC 66121 (Sub-No. 15), filed the District of Columbia. N ote : Applicant CARRIERS, INC., 2140 West 79th Street, August 15, 1969. Applicant: INDIAN states that the requested authority can­ Chicago, 111. 60620. Applicant’s repre­ BOW TRUCK LINES, LTD., 103 Harvard not be tacked with its existing authority. sentative: A. J. Bieberstein, 121 West Street, Smithtown, N.Y. 11787. Appli­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Doty Street, Madison, Wis. 53703. Au­ cant’s representative: Morton E. Kiel, cant requests it be held at Chicago, 111., thority sought to operate as a common 140 Cedar Street, New York, N.Y. 10006. or Washington, D.C. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Authority sought to operate as a common No. MC 94350 (Sub-No. 230), filed Au­ routes, transporting: (1) Communication carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular gust 13, 1969. Applicant: TRANSIT shelters (except mobile homes), equipped routes, transporting: Refuse containers, HOMES, INC., Haywood Road, Post or unequipped with communication from Deer Park, Copiague, and Haup- Office Box 1628, Greenville, S.C. 29602. equipment, ground support equipment pauge, N.Y., to points in Maine, New Applicant’s representative: Mitchell to mobilize shelters such as dollies, Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, King, Jr. (same address as above). Au­ mobilizer transporters, and demountable Rhode Islands Connecticut, New York, thority sought to operate as a common running gear;.(2) trucks, tractors, and New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular truck chassis, in secondary movements Delaware, District of Columbia, Virginia, routes, transporting: Trailers designed in truckaway service; (3) trailers and Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Florida, to be drawn by passenger automobiles in trailer chassis (except those designed to Louisiana, and Oklahoma, and returned initial movements, and buildings, in sec­ be drawn by passenger automobiles), and shipments on return. N ote: Applicant tions, or complete, from points in Craw­ containers, empty or when loaded with states it does not intend to tack, and is ford County, Ark., to points in the United general commodities (except explosives apparently willing to accept a restriction States (except Alaska and Hawaii). and other dangerous articles, household against tacking, if warranted. If a hear­ N ote : Applicant states that the requested goods and commodities in bulk), and ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ authority cannot be tacked with its ex­ (4) supplies and parts of commodities quests it be held at New York, N.Y. isting authority. Common control may described in (1), (2), and (3) above, No. MC 76032 (Sub-No. 248), filed be involved. If a hearing is deemed nec­ when moving on the same shipment with August 13, 1969. Applicant: NAVAJO essary, applicant requests it be held at commodities described in (1), (2), and FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1205 South Fort Smith, Ark. (3) above, from, to, and between points Platte River - Drive, Denver, Colo. No. MC 103993 (Sub-No. 447) in the United States including the 80223. Applicant’s representative: Wil­ (Amendment), filed July 28, 1969, pub­ District of Columbia (except points in liam E. Kenworthy (same address as lished F ederal R egister issue of August Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, above). Authority sought to operate as a 21, 1969, amended and republished as Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over amended, this issue. Applicant: MOR­ New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, regular routes, transporting: General GAN DRIVE-AWAY, INC., 2800 West and Wyoming). Restrictions: (a) Au­ commodities (except those of unusual Lexington Avenue, Elkhart, Ind. 46514. thority sought to be restricted against value, livestock, household goods as de­ Applicant’s representative: Paul D. the transportation of commodities which fined by the Commission, commodities in Borghesani, and Ralph H. Miller (same require the use of special equipment for bulk, commodities requiring special address as applicant). Authority sought transportation; (b) Authority sought equipment, those injurious or contami­ to operate as a common carrier, by motor herein is restricted to traffic moving (1) nating to other lading, lumber in bulk, in vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ on Government bills of lading, and (2) truckloads, sand and gravel, new auto­ ing: Prefabricated or precut buildings, on commercial bills of lading contain­ mobiles and uncrated furniture), be­ complete, knocked down, or in sections, ing an endorsement approved in Inter­ tween Raton, N. Mex., and Dumas, Tex.; and parts and materials used in the as­ pretation of Government Rate Tariff for from Raton over U.S. Highway 87 to sembly and erection thereof, from points Eastern Central Motor Carriers Associa­ Dumas, and return over the same route, west of the Mississippi River including tion, 322 ICC 161. N ote: Applicant serving no intermediate points, as an Louisiana and Minnesota, excluding Ha­ states it does not intend to tack, and alternate route for operating conven­ waii. N ote: Applicant states it does not apparently is willing to accept a restric­ ience only. N ote: Common control may intend to tack, and is apparently willing tion against tacking, if warranted. The be involved. If a hearing is deemed nec­ to accept a restriction against tacking, purpose of this republication is to cor­ essary, applicant requests it be held at if warranted. The purpose of this re­ rect a portion of item (4) above to read, Denver, Colo. publication is to include Alaska as a des­ * * * from, to, and between points in No. MC 92983 (Sub-No. 534), filed tination State. If a hearing is deemed the United States * * * inadvertently August 4, 1969. Applicant: ELDON MIL­ necessary, applicant requests it be held described as, “from” points in the United LER, INC., Post Office Drawer 2508, at Portland, Oreg. States * * * in the previous publica­ Kansas City, Mo. 64142. Authority sought No. MC 103993 (Sub-No. 450), filed tion. If a hearing is deemed necessary, to operate as a common carrier, by motor August 11, 1969. Applicant: MORGAN applicant requests it be held at Wash­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ ' DRIVE-AWAY, INC., 2800 West Lexing­ ington, D.C., or Chicago, 111. ing: Fats and oils, including blends and ton Avenue., Elkhart, Ind. 16514. Appli­ No. MC 64994 (Sub-No. 110), filed products thereof, in bulk, from points cant’s representative: Paul D. Borghe­ August 14, 1969. Applicant: HENNIS in California, to points in Colorado, sani, and Ralph H. Miller (same address

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTICES 14291 as above). Authority sought to operate ative: John Nelson (same address as Post Office Box 1200, Tallahassee, Fla. as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, applicant). Authority sought to operate 32302. Applicant’s representative: Sol H. over irregular routes, transporting: as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Proctor, 1729 Gulf Life Tower, Jackson­ Trailers, designed to be drawn by passen­ over irregular routes, transporting: ville, Fla. 32207. Authority sought to ger automobiles in initial movements, Chemicals, in bulk, from Garyville, La., operate as a common carrier, by motor from Henderson County, Ky., to points to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ in the United States (except Alaska and Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Okla­ ing: Acids and chemicals, in bulk, in Hawaii). N ote: Applicant states that the homa, Tennessee, and Texas. N ote: Ap­ tank, or hopper type vehicles, from the requested authority cannot be tacked plicant states that the requested au­ plantsite or storage facilities of the with its existing authority. If a hearing thority cannot be tacked with the Monsanto Co., at or near Gonzales and is deemed necessary, applicant requests existing authority. If a hearing is Pensacola, Fla., to points in Alabama, it be held at Evansville, Ind. deemed necessary, applicant requests it Connecticut, Georgia, Indiana, Ken­ No. MC 104149 (Sub-No. 185), filed be held at Washington, D.C. tucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, Penn­ July 30, 1969. Applicant: OSBORNE No. MC 110789 (Sub-No. 5), filed sylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, and TRUCK LINE, INC., 501 North 31st August 15,1969. Applicant: JOHN MAR­ Texas. N ote: Applicant states that it Street, Birmingham, Ala. 35203. Appli­ SHALL PHILLIPS, doing business as does not intend to tack, and is apparently cant’s representative: Maurice F. Bishop, J. MARSHALL PHILLIPS, R.F.D. No. 3, willing to accept a restriction against 327 Frank Nelson Building, Birmingham, Laurel, Del. 19956. Authority sought to tacking, if warranted. If a hearing is Ala. 35203. Authority sought to operate operate as a common carrier, by motor deemed necessary, applicant requests it as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ be held at Pensacola, Fla., Atlanta, Ga., over irregular routes, transporting: ing: Agricultural lime, from Lancaster or Jacksonville, Fla. Plastic pipe, plastic or iron fittings and County, Pa., to points in Delaware and No. MC 112713 (Sub-No. 116), filed connections, valves, hydrants, and gas­ Maryland, east of the Susquehanna August 19, 1969. Applicant: YELLOW kets, from the site of the plant and ware­ River and Chesapeake Bay. N ote: Ap­ FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., Post Office house f acilities of the Clow Corp. located plicant states that the requested author­ near Lincoln, Talladega County, Ala., to Box 8462 92d at State Line, Kansas City, ity cannot be tacked with its existing Mo. 64114. Applicant’s representative: points in Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, authority. If a hearing is deemed neces­ Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massa­ John M. Records (same address as ap­ sary, applicant requests it be held at plicant) . Authority sought to operate as a chusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Ne­ Washington, D.C., or Philadelphia, Pa. braska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over No. MC 111748 (Sub-No. 15), filed Au­ irregular routes, transporting: Meats, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Penn­ gust 15, 1969. Applicant: WILLIAMS sylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., Tar- meat products and meat byproducts, and Vermont, Wisconsin, and the District of articles distributed by meat packing­ kio, Mo. Applicant’s representative: houses, as defined in sections A and C of Columbia. Note: Applicant states that Duane W. Acklie, 521 South 14th Street, the requested authority cannot be tacked Post Office Box 806, Lincoln, Nebr. 68501. appendix I to the report in Descriptions with its existing authority. If a hearing Authority sought to operate as a common in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. is deemed necessary, applicant requests carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular 209 and 766, except commodities in bulk, it be held at Birmingham, Ala. routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ in tank vehicles and except hides, from No. MC 106398 (Sub-No. 417), filed ucts, and meat byproducts, and articles points in the Omaha, Nebr., Council August 14, 1969. Applicant: NATIONAL distributed by meat packinghouses, as Bluffs, Iowa, commercial zone, to points TRAILER CONVOY, INC., 1925 National defined in sections A and C of Appendix I in Nevada and Utah. N ote: Applicant Plaza, Tulsa, Okla. 74151. Applicant’s to the report ha Descriptions in Motor states that the present requested author­ representative: Irvin Tull and Fred Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and ity cannot be tacked with its existing au­ Rahal, Jr. (same address as above). Au­ 766, except commodities in bulk, in tank thority. If a hearing is deemed necessary, thority sought to operate as a common vehicles and except hides, from points in applicant requests it be held at Omaha, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular the Omaha, Nebr., Council Bluffs, Iowa, Nebr. routes, transporting: Trailers, designed commercial zone to points in Nebraska, No. MC 112713 (Sub-No. 117), filed to be drawn by passenger automobiles, in Kansas, and Missouri. N ote: Applicant August 19, 1969. Applicant: YELLOW initial movements, from points in Barn­ states that the requested authority can­ FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., Post Office well County, S.C., to points in the United not be tacked with its existing authority. Box 8462, 92d at State Line, Kansas City, States (except Alaska and Hawaii). If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Mo. 64114. Applicant’s representative: Note : Applicant states that the requested cant requests it to be held at Omaha, John M. Records (same address as ap­ authority cannot be tacked with its exist­ Nebr. plicant) . Authority sought to operate as ing authority. Common control and dual No. MC 112148 (Sub-No. 45), filed Au­ a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over operations may be involved. If a hearing gust 5, 1969. Applicant: POWERS regular routes, transporting: General is deemed necessary, applicant requests TRANSPORTATION, INC., Post Office commodities (except those of unusual it be held at Columbia or Charleston, Box 87, Storm Lake, Iowa 50588. Appli­ value, classes A and B explosives, live­ S.C. cant’s representative: William A. Lan­ stock, household goods as defined by the No. MC 107403 (Sub-No. 778), filed Au­ dau, 1451 East Grand Avenue, Des Commission, commodities in bulk, and gust 15, 1969. Applicant: MATLACK, Moines, Iowa 50306. Authority sought to those requiring special equipment), serv­ INC., io West Baltimore Avenue, operate as a common carrier, by motor ing Dexter, Mich., as an off-route point hansdowne, Pa. 19050. Applicant’s repre­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ in connection with carrier’s authorized sentative: John Nelson (same address as ing: Meat, meat products, meat byprod­ regular route operations to and from above). Authority sought to operate as a ucts, and articles distributed by meat Detroit, Mich. N ote: If a hearing is common carrier, by motor vehicle, over packinghouses, as described in sections deemed necessary, applicant requests it irregular routes, transporting: Liquid A and C of appendix I to the report in be held at Detroit or Lansing, Mich. awwreaj feed supplements, in bulk, in tank Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certifi­ No. MC 112713 (Sub-No. 118), filed chicles, from Adrian, Mich., to points in cates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from Post- August 19, 1969. Applicant: YELLOW Indiana and Ohio. N ote : Applicant states ville, Iowa, to points in Illinois, Indiana, FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., Post Office that the requested authority cannot be and Ohio. N ote: Common control may Box 8462, 92d at State Line, Kansas City, jacked with its existing authority. Com­ be involved. Applicant states it does not Mo. 64114. Applicant’s representative: mon control may be involved. If a hear- intend to tack, and apparently is willing John M. Records (same address as bg is deemed necessary, applicant re- to accept a restriction against tacking, above). Authority sought to operate as a ■ir is It be held at Detroit, Mich., or if warranted. If a hearing is deemed common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Washington, D.C. necessary, applicant requests it be held irregular routes, transporting: Prepared No. MC 107403 (Sub-No. 779), filed at Des Moines, Iowa, or Detroit, Mich. foodstuffs, in vehicles equipped with me­ august 21, 1969. Applicant: MATLACK, No. MC 112520 (Sub-No. 204), filed chanical refrigeration, from the plantsite 10 West Baltimore Avenue, Lans- August 8, 1969. Applicant: McKENZIE and warehouse facilities of the Pillsbury Wne> Pa. 19050. Applicant’s represent­ TANK LINES, INC., New Quincy Road, Co., at or near Denison, Tex., to points

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 1 T, T 969 14292 NOTICES in Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, and Connecticut, Delaware, District of Co­ rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular South Dakota. N ote: Applicant states lumbia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Mar­ routes, transporting: General commodi­ that the requested authority cannot be yland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New ties (except classes A and B explosives, tacked with its existing authority. If a Hampshire, New, Jersey, New York, Ohio, household goods as defined in 17 M.C.C. hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, 467, commodities in bulk, and livestock), requests it be held at Washington, D.C., Virginia, and West Virginia. Note: Ap­ restricted so that no service shall be ren­ or Kansas City, Mo. plicant states that the requested author­ dered in the transportation of any No. MC 113678 (Sub-No. 362), filed ity cannot be tacked with its existing parcels, packages, or articles weighing August 11, 1969. Applicant: CURTIS, authority. Applicant further states it in the aggregate more than 100 pounds INC., Post Office Box 16004, Stockyards does not seek any duplicating authority from one consignor at any one location Station, Denver, Colo. 80216. Applicant’s for the purpose of sale or otherwise. If a to one consignee at any one location on representatives: Duane W. Acklie, and hearing is deemed necessary, applicant any 1 day, between points located (1) in Richard Peterson, Post Office Box 806, requests it be held at Chicago, 111. an area bounded by a line beginning at Lincoln, Nebr. 68501. Authority sought to No. MC 114273 (Sub-No. 47), filed the Tex as-New Mexico State line near operate as a common carrier, by motor September 4, 1969. Applicant: CEDAR Farwell, Tex., extending along U.S. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ RAPIDS STEEL TRANSPORTATION, Highway 84 to Sweetwater, Tex.; thence ing: (1) Bananas, plantains, pineapples INC., Post Office Box 68, 3930 16th Ave­ southerly along Texas Highway TO to and coconuts, and (2) agricultural com­ nue SW., Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52406. the junction of U.S. Highway 277; thence modities, in mixed shipments, the trans­ Applicant’s representative: Robert E. along U.S. Highway 277 to San Angelo, portation of which is partially exempt Konchar, Suite 315, Commerce Exchange Tex.; thence along U.S. Highway 67 to from economic regulations under section Building, 2720 First Avenue NE., Cedar Barnhart, Tex., thence along Texas 206(b) (6) of the Act when transported Rapids, Iowa. Authority sought to oper­ Highway 163 to Ozona, Tex., thence with (1) above, from Wilmington, Del., ate as a common carrier, by motor vehi­ westerly along U.S. Highway 290 to junc­ to points in Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, cle, over irregular routes, transporting: tion U.S. Highway 80 (east of Kent, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Trailers, trailer chassis (except those de­ Tex.); thence along U.S. Highway 80 Ohio, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Nebraska, signed to be drawn by passenger auto­ (through El Paso, Tex.) to the New and Wisconsin. N ote: Applicant states mobiles) frailer converted dollies, truck Mexico-Texas State line (near Anthony, that it does not intend to tack, and is tractors, containers, bodies and mate­ N. Mex.), (2) in the counties of Curry, apparently willing to accept a restriction rials, supplies and parts of such com­ De Baca, Roosevelt, Lincoln, Chaves, against tacking, if warranted. If a hear­ modities, between points in Lee County, Dona Ana, Otero, Eddy, and Lea, N. Mex., ing is deemed necessary, applicanr does Iowa, on the one hand, and, on the other, and (3) points on U.S. Highway 80 from not specify a location. points in the United States, except Ha­ Sweetwater, Tex., to Dallas, and Fort Worth, Tex. N ote : Applicant states that No. MC 113828 (Sub-No. 163), filed waii and Alaska. N ote: Applicant states August 15, 1969. -Applicant: O’BOYLE that the requested authority cannot be it desires the right to interline with other TANK LINES, INCORPORATED, 4848 tacked with its existing authority. If a motor common carriers. Applicant fur­ Cordell Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20014. hearing is deemed necessary, applicant ther states that it would tack with its requests it be held at Chicago, 111. present authority at Dallas, Tex., to Applicant’s representatives: William P. serve Oklahoma City, Okla. The purpose Sullivan, 1819 H Street NW., Washing­ No. MC 114533 (Sub-No. 197), filed Au­ of this republication is to broaden the ton, D.C. 20006, also John P. Grimm gust 13, 1969. Applicant: BANKERS scope of authority sought. If a hearing (same address as applicant) . Authority DISPATCH CORPORATION, 4970 South is deemedmecessary, applicant requests it sought to operate as a common carrier, Archer Avenue, Chicago, 111. 60632. Ap­ be held at El Paso, Tex. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, plicant’s representatives: Warren W. No. MC 115322 (Sub-No. 62), filed transporting: (1) Chemicals, in bulk, Wallin, 330 South Jefferson Street, Chi­ August 6, 1969. Applicant: REDWING from Richmond, Va., to Waverly, Va,., cago, 111. 60606, and Arnold Burke, 2220 REFRIGERATED, INC., Post Office Box restricted to traffic having an immedi­ Brunswick Building, 69 West Washington 1698, Sanford, Fla. 32771. Applicant’s ately prior movement by rail; and (2) Boulevard, Chicago, 111. 60602. Authority representatives: James E. Wilson, 1735 glycerine, in bulk, from Baltimore, Md., sought to operate as a common carrier, K Street NW., Washington, D.C. 20006, to Richmond, Va. Note: Applicant states by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, and J. V. McCoy, Post Office Box 426, it does not intend to tack, and is ap­ transporting: Small parts, electronic Tampa, Fla. Authority sought to operate parently willing to accept a restriction components and supplies used in the re­ as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, against tacking, if warranted. If a hear­ pair, maintenance, and operation of elec­ over irregular routes, transporting: ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ tronic and mechanical office machines Frozen foods, (1) from the plantsite and quests it be held at Washington, D.C. and systems, limited to 150 pounds per storage facilities of Campbell Soup Co. No. MC 114211 (Sub-No. 130), filed shipment, (a) between Chicago, 111., on in Salisbury, Md., to points in North August 5, 1969. Applicant: WARREN the one hand, and, on the other, points Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, TRANSPORT, INC., 324 Manhard, Post in Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Mis­ Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, and Flor­ Office Box 420, Waterloo; Iowa 50704. souri, and Ohio; and (b) between De­ ida; and (2) from the plantsite and stor­ Applicant’s representative: Charles W. troit, Mich,, on the one hand, and, on the age facilities of Campbell Soup Co. in Singer, 33 North Dearborn Street, Suite other, points in Indiana and Ohio. N ote: Salisbury, Md., to points in Virginia for 1625, Chicago, 111. 60602. Authority Applicant has an application pending for stop-off for partial unloading on traffic sought to operate as a common carrier, contract carrier authority in MC 128616, destined to the above-named States. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, therefore dual operations may be in­ Note: Applicant states it does not intend transporting: Tractors (except those volved. Applicant states that the re­ to tack, and is apparently willing to ac­ with vehicle beds, bed frames, and fifth quested authority cannot be tacked with cept a restriction against tacking, u wheels), equipment designed for use in its existing authority. If a hearing is warranted. Common control may be in­ conjunction with tractors,agricultural, deemed necessary, applicant requests it volved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, industrial, and construction machinery, be held at Chicago, HI., or Detroit, Mich. applicant requests it be held at Washing­ and equipment, trailers designed for the No. MC 114737 (Sub-No. 6) (Amend­ transportation of the above described ment), filed April 30, 1969, published ton, D.C. commodities (except those trailers de­ F ederal R egister issue of May 29, 1969, No. MC 115491 (Sub-No. 118), filed signed to be drawn by passenger amended August 22, 1969, and repub­ August 11, 1969. Applicant: COMMER­ automobiles), attachments for the above- lished as amended this issue. Applicant: CIAL CARRIER CORPORATION, 502 described commodities, internal combus­ O. A. WOODY, doing business as O and East Bridgers Avenue, Post Office Box tion engines, and parts of the above- A FILM LINES, 14th and Avenue G, 67, Aubumdale, Fla. 33823. Applicant’s described commodities, when moving in Lubbock, Tex. 79401. Applicant’s repre­ representative: Tony G. Russell (same mixed loads with such commodities, from sentative: Warren A. Goff, 2111 Sterick address as above). Authority sought to the plant and warehouse sites of Deere Building, Memphis, Term. 38103. Author­ operate as a common carrier, by motor & Co. in Dodge County, Wis., to points in ity sought to operate as a common car­

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTICES 14293 vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, sary, applicant requests it be held at ing: Citrus products, canned beverages, West Virginia, and the District of Colum­ Washington, D.C. canned beverage preparations, glass or bia. Note: Applicant states that it does No. MC 117883 (Sub-No. 128), filed plastic containers and closures therefor, not intend to tack, and is apparently will­ August 14, 1969. Applicant: SUBLER in straight or mixed shipments, from ing to accept a restriction against tack­ TRANSFER, INC., East Main Street, Bradenton, Fla., to points in Alabama, ing, if waranted. If a hearing is deemed Versailles, Ohio 45380. Applicant’s rep­ Florida, and Georgia. N ote: Applicant necessary applicant requests it be held resentative: William J. Boyd, 29 South states it does not intent to tack, and is at Washington, D.C., or Philadelphia, Pa. La Salle Street, Chicago, HI. 60603. Au­ apparently willing to accept a restriction No. MC 116544 (Sub-No. I l l ) , filed Au­ thority sought to operate as a common against tacking, if warranted. Common gust 12, 1969. Applicant: WILSON carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular control may be involved. If a hearing BROTHERS TRUCK LINE, INC., 700 routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ is deemed necessary, applicant requests East Fairview Street, Post Office Box 636, ucts, and meat byproducts, and articles it be held at Tampa, Fla. Carthage, Mo. 64836. Applicant’s repre­ distributed by meat packinghouses, as No. MC 115523 (Sub-No. 153) (Amend­ sentative,: Robert Wilson (same address defined in sections A and C of appendix ment), filed June 26, 1969, published in as above). Authority sought to operate I to the report in Descriptions in Motor the Federal R egister issue of August 7, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 1969, amended, and republished as over irregular routes, transporting: 766, except commodities in bulk in tank amended this issue. Applicant: CLARK Meats, meat products, meat byproducts, vehicles and except hides, from points in TANK LINES COMPANY, a corporation, and articles distributed by meat packing­ the Omaha, Nebr., Council Bluffs, Iowa 1450 North Beck Street, Salt Lake City, houses, as described in sections A and C commercial zone, to points in Ohio, Utah 84116. Applicant’s representative: of appendix I to the report in Descrip­ Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Halard E. Barker (same address as appli­ tions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 York, New Jersey, Maine, Connecticut, cant). Authority sought to operate as a M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except hides and Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles), Massachusetts, Virginia, West Virginia, irregular routes, transporting: Road oil, from Friona, Tex., to points in Florida. Delaware, Maryland, and Washington, asphalt, and fuel oil in bulk, (a) between Note : Applicant states it does not intend D.C. N ote : Applicant states that the re­ points in Iron, Beaver, Millard, Juab, and to tack, and is apparently willing to ac­ quested authority cannot be tacked with Tooele Counties, Utah, and points in cept a restriction against tacking, if war­ its existing authority. If a hearing is Nevada and Arizona; and (b) from ranted. If a hearing is deemed necessary, deemed necessary, applicant requests it Grand Junction, Colo., and 10 miles applicant requests it be held at Kansas be held in Omaha, Nebr. thereof, to points in Utah, Arizona, Cali­ City, Mo. No. MC 118263 (Sub-No. 15), filed fornia, Colorado, Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 419), filed August 14, 1969. Applicant: COLDWAY Washington, Wyoming, Montana, New August 18, 1969. Applicant: WILLIS CARRIERS, INC., Post Office Box 38, Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, SHAW FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., a cor­ Clarksville, Ind. 47131. Applicant’s rep­ Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. poration, Post Office Box 188, Elm resentative: Paul M. Daniell, 1600 First Note: The purpose of this republication Springs, Ark. 72728. Applicant’s repre­ Federal Building, Atlanta, Ga. 30303. is to include North Dakota, South Da­ sentative: Bobby G. Shaw (same address Authority sought to operate as a common kota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and as applicant). Authority sought to oper­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Texas as destination States in (b) above. ate as a common carrier, by motor vehi­ routes, transporting: (1) Bananas, plan­ Applicant states it intends to tack the cle, over irregular routes, transporting: tains, pineapples, and coconuts, and (2) sought authority under MC-115523, Subs (1) Bananas, plantains, pineapples, and agricultural commodities, in mixed ship­ 19, 20, 27, 60, wherein it is authorized to coconuts and (2) agricultural commodi­ ments, the transportation of which is serve points in Oregon, Idaho, Utah, and ties, in mixed shipments, the transporta­ partially exempt under section 203 (b) (6) Wyoming. Applicant further states no tion of which is exempt under section of the Act when transported in mixed duplicating authority sought herein. If 203(b)(6) of the Act when transported shipments with (1) above, from Wil­ a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant with (1) above, from Wilmington, Del., mington, Del., to points in Kentucky, requests it be held at Salt Lake City, to points in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee. N ote : Ap­ Utah, or Grand Junction, Colo. Tennessee, Arkansas, Louisiana, Indiana, plicant states that it does not intend to No. MC 115703 (Sub-No. 3), filed Au­ Wisconsin, Illinois, Minnesota, Iowa, tack, and is apparently willing to accept gust 20, 1969. Applicant: KREITZ Missouri, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Ne­ a restriction against tacking, if war­ MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., 717 Tulpe- braska, South Dakota, North Dakota, and ranted. Applicant holds contract carrier hocken Street, Reading, Pa. 19603. Ap­ Colorado. Note: Applicant states that the authority under MC 111069 and subs plicant’s representative: James A. Vitez requested authority cannot be tacked thereunder, therefore, dual operations (same address as applicant). Authority with its existing authority. If a hearing may be involved. If a hearing is deemed sought to operate as a common carrier, is deemed necessary, applicant does not necessary, applicant requests it be held by motor vehicle, over- irregular routes, specify a location. at Washington, D.C. transporting: Commodities which require No. MC 117574 (Sub-No. 184), filed No. MC 119493 (Sub-No. 49), filed Au­ the use of special equipment or handling August 7, 1969. Applicant: DAILY EX­ gust 4, 1969. Applicant: MONKEM by reason of size or weight; contractors PRESS, INC., Post Office Box 39, Carlisle, COMPANY, INC., West 20th Street equipment; heavy and bulky articles, ma­ Pa. 17013. Applicant’s representative: Road, Post Office Box 1196, Joplin, Mo. chinery parts; self-propelled articles, E. S. Moore, Jr. (same address as appli­ 64801. Applicant’s representative: Ray F. each weighing 15,000 pounds or more and cant) . Authority sought to operate as a Kempt, Post Office Box 1196, Joplin, related machinery, tools, parts and sup­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Mo. 64801. Authority sought to operate plies restricted to commodities which are irregular routes, transporting: Vehicles, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, transported on trailers (except house- and other wheeled equipment specially over irregular routes, transporting: Sand bold goods and commodities in bulk), designed for off-highway use or combina­ and rock, whole or crushed, from points 1A) between military installations or tion off-highway use, and tools, equip­ in Arkansas on and north of the Arkan­ defense Department establishment in ment, or other commodities when shipped sas River and on and west of Arkansas Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, in such specially designed vehicles or Highway 23, points in Oklahoma on and Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, equipment when transported by the north of the Arkansas River, to points in Michigan, New Jersey, New York, North driveaway or towaway method (not in­ Cherokee County, Kans., and points in Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Is- cluding ordinary highway automobiles, Jasper and Newton Counties, Mo. N ote: jand, Virginia, West Virginia, and the trucks, buses, trailers, tractors, or mobile Applicant states that the requested au­ «strict of Columbia, and (B) between homes), between points in the United thority cannot be tacked with its existing Points in (A) above, on the one hand, States (excluding Alaska and Hawaii). authority. If a hearing is deemed neces­ noi 0n the other> Points in Connecticut, Note: Applicant states that the requested sary, applicant requests it be held at «laware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, authority cannot be tacked with its exist­ Washington, D.C. aryiand, Massachusetts, Michigan, New ing authority. Common control may be ersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, No. MC 123067 (Sub-No. 91), filed Au­ involved. If a hearing is deemed neces­ gust 4, 1969. Applicant: M & M TANK

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14294 NOTICES

LINES, INC., Post Office Box 612, Win­ ranted. Applicant further states no dupli­ service to be performed, under a contin­ ston-Salem, N.C. 27102. Applicant’s rep­ cating authority being sought. If a uing contract or contracts with The resentative: B. M.: Shirley, Jr. (same hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Lorillard Corporation of New York, N.Y; address as applicant). Authority sought requests it be held at Washington, D.C. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, to operate as a common carrier, by No. MC 125474 (Sub-No. 21), filed applicant requests it be held at Washing­ motor vehicle, over irregular routes, August 13, 1969. Applicant: BULK ton, D.C. transporting: Fertilizer and fertilizer HAULERS, INC., 1901 Wooster Street, No. MC 126910 (Sub-No. 2), filed Au­ materials, in bulk, in bags, from Clyo Wilmington, N.C. Applicant’s represent­ gust 21,1969. Applicant: KING B. ROW­ and Metter, Ga., to points in Florida and ative: John C. Bradley, 618 Perpetual LAND, 55 East Washburn Street, New South Carolina. N ote: Applicant states Building, Washington, D.C. 20004. Au­ London, Ohio 44851. Applicant’s repre­ that the requested authority cannot be thority sought to operate as a common sentative: Paul F. Beery, 88 East Broad tacked with its existing authority. Com­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Authority mon control may be involved. If a hear­ routes, transporting: (1) Dimethyl ter- sought to operate as a contract carrier, ing is deemed necessary, applicant ephthalate, (a) from points in New Han­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, requests it be held at Atlanta. Ga. over County, N.C., to points in Tennessee transporting: (1) Tile and drainage ma­ No. MC 123775 (Sub-No. 1) , filed Au­ and South Carolina and Virginia and terial, and (2) fittings, connections, lin­ gust 20, 1969. Applicant: GENE P. LIT­ (b) from Forster, S.C., to points in North ers and filters designed for use with the TLE, doing business es ROAD SERVICE Carolina and Tennessee and (2) metha­ foregoing articles in (1) above, between GARAGE, 1448 North Main Street, nol, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from points the plantsites of the E. Biglow Co., at Marion, Ohio 43302. Applicant’s repre­ in New Hanover County, N.C., to points or near New London, Ohio, and Michigan sentative: James R. Stiverson, 50 West in North Carolina, South Carolina, Ten­ Vitrified Tile Co., at or near Corunna, Broad Street, Columbia, Ohio 43215. Au­ nessee, Virginia, and Georgia. N ote: Mich., on the one hand, and, on the other, thority sought to operate as a common Applicant states that the requested au­ points in Michigan and Ohio. Restric­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular thority cannot be tacked with its existing tion: The operations requested herein routes,* transporting: Disabled and authority. Common control may be in­ will be limited to the transportation wrecked vehicles in wrecker service and volved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, service to be performed under a con­ tow away service and in connection applicant requests it be held at Raleigh, tinuing contract or contracts with the therewith, parts and equipment for dis­ N.C. or Washington, D.C. E. Biglow Co., New London, Ohio, and abled or wrecked vehicles, between No. MC 126045 (Sub-No. 18), filed June Michigan Vitrified Tile Co., Corunna, Youngstown, Ohio, on the one hand, and, 26,1969. Applicant: ALTER TRUCKING Mich. Note : If a hearing is deemed nec­ on the other, points in Illinois, Indiana, AND TERMINAL CORPORATION, Post essary, applicant requests it be held at Maryland, Michigan, New York, North Office Box 3122, Davenport, Iowa 52808. Washington, D.C. Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Applicant’s representative: Lord, Bissell No. MC 127042 (Sub-No. 44), filed West Virginia. Restriction: No mobile & Brook, 135 South La Salle Street, Chi­ August 1, 1969. Applicant: HAGEN, INC., homes or house trailer shall be trans­ cago, 111. 60603. Authority sought to op­ 4120 Floyd Boulevard, Post Office Box 6, ported under authority sought herein. erate as a common carrier, by motor Leeds Station, Sioux City, Iowa 51108. Applicant states that the requested au­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Applicant’s representative: Joseph W. thority cannot be tacked with its exist­ ing: Fertilizer and fertilizer materials, Harvey (same address as applicant). ing authority. If a hearing is deemed in bulk, from Des Moines, Iowa, to points Authority sought to operate as a common necessary, applicant requests it be held in Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, South carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular at Columbia, Ohio. Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Illi­ routes, transporting: Foodstuffs, and No. MC 124212 (Sub-No. 47), filed nois. N ote: Applicant states it does not foodstuffs in mixed loads toith agricul­ August 15, 1969. Applicant: MITCHELL intend to tack, and is apparently willing tural commodities as defined in section TRANSPORT, INC., 21111 Chagrin Bou­ to accept a restriction against tacking, 203(b) (6) of the Act, as amended, from levard, Cleveland, Ohio 44122; Applicant’s if warranted. If a hearing is deemed Sioux City, Iowa, to points in Arizona, representative: _J. A. Kundtz, 1050 Union necessary, applicant requests it be held California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Commerce Building, Cleveland, Ohio at Des Moines, Iowa. Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mex­ 44115. Authority sought to operate as a No. MC 126436 (Sub-No. 3) /filed June ico, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Wash­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over 30, 1969. Applicant: CONTINENTAL ington, and Wyoming. N ote: Applicant irregular routes, transporting: Cement CONTRACT CARRIERS CORP., Post states joinder or tacking possible under clinker, between the plantsites of Lehigh Office Box 20365, Greensboro, N.C. 27420. various subs however applicant intends Portland Cement Co. located at Union Applicant’s representatives: A. David also to accept interline shipments from Bridge, Md., Fogelsville, Pa., and Alsen, Millner, 744 Broad Street, Newark, N.J. other common carriers. If a hearing is N.Y. N ote: Common control and dual 07102 and Harry Ross, Warner Building, deemed necessary, applicant requests it operations may be involved. Applicant Washington, D.C. 20004. Authority be held at Sioux City, Iowa, o r Omaha, states that the requested authority can­ sought to operate as a contract carrier, Nebr. not be tacked with its existing authority. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, No. MC 127042 (Sub-No. 46), filed Au­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ transporting: Tobacco (except leaf, gust 8, 1969. Applicant: HAGEN, INC., cant requests it be held at Washington, chopped leaf, redried leaf, stemmed leaf, 4120 Floyd Boulevard, Post Office Box 6, D.C. and stems of tobacco), leaf, redried leaf, Leeds Station, Sioux City, Iowa 51108. No. MC 125430 (Sub-No. 4) , filed Au­ stemmed leaf, and stems of tobacco, when Applicant’s representative: Joseph W. gust 1, 1969. Applicant: CLAUDE W. transported in the same vehicle and at Harvey (same address as applicant). Au­ WAGNER, Route 1, McHenry, Md. 21541. the same time with commodities subject thority sought to operate as a common Applicant’s representative: Paul F. Sulli­ to economic regulation, tobacco products, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular van, 701 Washington Building, Washing­ and articles used in the production, proc­ routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ ton, D.C. 20005. Authority sought to essing, manufacture, sale and distri­ ucts and meat byproducts, and articles operate as a common carrier, by motor bution of tobacco and tobacco products, distributed by meat packinghouses, as vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ between the facilities of the Lorillard defined in sections A and C of appendix ing: (1) Such commodities as are dealt Corp. in Danville, Va., Greensboro, N.C., I to the report in Descriptions in Motor in by retail grocery stores from McKees­ and Lexington and Louisville, Ky., on Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and port and Belle Vernon, Pa.; to Western- the one hand, and, on the other, points 766, except hides and commodities in port, Md.; and (2) lumber, from points in Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colo­ bulk, from Salmon, Idaho, to points m in Pennsylvania on and west of U.S. rado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Ne­ Colorado, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, Highway 11 to points in Virginia, North braska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Da­ Missouri, Minnesota, Illinois, Wisconsin, Carolina, and Tennessee. N ote: Appli­ kota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, and Wyoming. N ote: Applicant states it cant states it does not intend to tack, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. does not intend to tack, and is apparently and is apparently willing to accept Restriction: The operations authorized willing to accept a restriction against a restriction against tacking, if war­ herein are limited to a transportation tacking, if warranted. If a hearing «

FEDERAL REGISTER. VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTICES 14295 deemed necessary, applicant requests it Ellis, Hood, Johnson, Parker, Wise, routes, transporting: Waste materials, be held at Salt Lake City, Utah, or Boise, Denton, Collin, and Palo Pinto Counties, and rags, cottons, woolens, clothing, and Idaho. Tex. N ote : Applicant states that the re­ burlap, all used, from New York, N.Y., to No. MC 127834 (Sub-No. 39), filed Au­ quested authority cannot be tacked with McAllen, El Paso, and Laredo, Tex. Note : gust 18, 1969. Applicant: CHEROKEE its existing authority. If a hearing is Applicant states it does not intend to HAULING & RIGGING, INC., 540-42 deemed necessary, applicant requests it tack, and is apparently willing to accept Merritt Avenue, Nashville, Tenn. 37203. be held at Fort Worth, Tarrant County, a restriction against tacking, if war­ Applicant’s representative: Robert M. Tex. ranted. If a hearing is deemed necessary, Pearce, Post Office Box E, Bowling No. MC 133735 (Sub-No. 1), filed applicant requests it be held at New Green, Ky. 42101. Authority sought to August 7, 1969. Applicant: AUDUBON York, N.Y. operate as a common carrier, by motor TRANSPORT, INC., Audubon, Iowa vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ 50025. Applicant’s representative: Wil­ Motor Carriers of P assengers ing: Aluminum light poles, light pole liam A. Landau, 1451 East Grand Avenue, No. MC 3647 (Sub-No. 418), filed Au­ brackets, parts and accessories there­ Des Moines, Iowa 50306. Authority gust 13,1969. Applicant: PUBLIC SERV­ for, from points in Washington County, sought to operate as a common carrier, ICE COORDINATED TRANSPORT, a Va., to points in United States (except by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, corporation 180 Boyden Avenue, Maple­ Alaska and Hawaii). N ote: Applicant transporting: Liquid fertilizer, fertilizer wood, N.J. 07040. Applicant's representa­ states that the requested authority can­ solutions, and anhydrous ammonia, in tive: Richard Fryling (same address as not be tacked with its existing authority. bulk, in tank vehicles, from Audubon, applicant). Authority sought to operate If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Iowa, to points in Kansas, Minnesota, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, cant requests it be held at Nashville, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and over regular routes, transporting: Pas­ Tenn. South Dakota. N ote: Applicant states sengers and their baggage, and express No. MC 128772 (Sub-No. 2), filed Au­ that it does not intend to tack, and is and newspapers, in the same vehicle with gust 14, 1969. Applicant: STAR BULK apparently willing to accept a restric­ passengers, between paints in Wayne TRANSPORT, INC., 827 North Front tion against tacking, if warranted. Com­ Township, N.J. and points in Denville Street, New Ulm, Minn. 56073. Appli­ mon control may be involved. If a hear­ Township, N.J.; from the junction of In­ cant’s representative: Charles E. Nie- ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ terstate Highway 80, New Jersey High­ man, 1160 Northwestern Bank Building, quests it be held at Des Moines, Iowa. way 23 and U.S. Highway 46, Wayne Minneapolis, Minn. 55402. Authority No. MC 133753, filed May 19,1969. Ap­ Township, N.J., over Interstate Highway sought to operate as a contract carrier, plicant: DOMSEY TRADING CORPO­ 80 to the junction of U.S. Highway 46, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, RATION, 29-05 122d Street, College Denville Township, N.J., and return over transporting: (1) Dairy products, from Point, N.Y. 11354. Applicant’s representa­ the same route, for operating conven­ Clarkfield, Minn., to points in Chicago, tive: Arthur Salm (same address as ience only, serving no intermediate HI., and (2) Dairy equipment, dairy sup­ above). Authority sought to operate as points, except at the termini for purpose plies, and dairy materials, from Chicago, a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over of joinder only with applicant’s existing 111., to points in Clarkfield, Minn., under irregular routes, transporting: Cande- authorized routes. N ote: If a hearing is contract with Five Star Dairyland Co­ lilla wax, from Marathon, Tex., to deemed necessary, applicant requests it operative. Note: If a hearing is deemed points in New York and New Jersey under be held at Allentown, Pa., or Newark, N.J. necessary, applicant requests it be held contract with Adams Candelilla Wax Co. No. MC 69394 (Sub-No. 9), filed Sep­ at Minneapolis or St. Paul, Minn. N ote : If a hearing is deemed ‘necessary, tember 3, 1969. Applicant: THE GRAY No. MC 129981 fSub-No. 1), filed applicant requests it be held at New York, LINE, INC., 25 Webber Street, Roxbury August 7, 1969.. Applicant: BRIDG- N.Y. (Boston), Mass. 02119. Applicant’s repre­ PORD DISTRIBUTING CO., a corpora­ No. MC 133936, filed August 1,' 1969. sentative: Charles W. Singer, 33 North tion, l Frozen Food Plaza, Secaucus, N.J. Applicant: LESCO, INC., Post Office Box Dearborn Street, Chicago, HI. 60602. Au­ 07094. Applicant’s representative: J. Max 2663, Memphis, Tenn. 38102. Applicant’s thority sought to operate as a common Harding, 605 South 14th Street, Post representative: D. D. Brunson, 419 carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular Office Box 2028, Lincoln, Nebr. 68501. Northwest Sixth Street, Oklahoma City, and irregular routes, transporting: Pas­ Authority sought to operate as a con­ Okla. 73102. Authority sought to operate sengers and their baggage, and express, tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irreg­ as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, mail and newspapers in the same vehicle ular routes, transporting: Frozen bread over irregular routes, transporting: (1) with passengers (A) Regular routes: (1) dough and frozen bakery products, from New furniture, in cartons, or containers; Between Boston, Mass., and Woonsocket, the plahtsite and warehouse facilities parts and items used or dealt in by R.I., serving all intermediate points. utilized by Frozen-Rite Foods, Inc., at wholesale and retail furniture merchan­ From Boston over Interstate Highway Dallas, Tex., to points in .the United disers and suppliers; (2) premiums, 90 to interchange number 13, thence over States (except Alaska and Hawaii); re­ prizes, displays, and advertising mate­ unnumbered highway to junction Mas­ turn shipments and material and sup­ rials used, distributed or dealt in by sachusetts Highway 30, thence over Mas­ plies used in the manufacture of frozen wholesale and retail furniture merchan­ sachusetts Highway 30 to junction Mas­ bread dough and frozen bakery products, disers and suppliers; and (3) commod­ sachusetts Highway 126, and thence over m the reverse direction; restricted ities as set forth in ICC Administrative Massachusetts Highway 126 to Woon­ against the transportation of any com­ Rules 77 and 110, when moving in mixed socket, and return over the same route. modities in bulk and limited to service shipments with regulated commodities (2) Between Holliston, Mass., and Bell­ ^ ii0rmed UHder a continuing contract set forth in (1) and (2) above, from New ingham, Mass. From Holliston over un­ with Frozen-Rite Foods, Inc. N ote: If a Albany, Miss.; Camden and Truman, numbered highway via Medway, Mass, hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Ark.; Athens and Memphis, Tenn.; requests it be held at Washington, D.C., (also over Massachusetts Highways 16 °r Dallas, Tex. Selma, Ala.; and Taccoa, Ga., to points and 109 and unnumbered highways via in Arkansas, Missouri, Mississippi, Ken­ West Medway), to junction Massachu­ No. MC 133643 (Sub-No. 1), filed Au- tucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Alabama, setts Highway 140, and thence over Mas­ {¡¡J 8. 1969. Applicant: JAMES W. and Georgia. N ote: If a hearing is sachusetts Highway 140 to Bellingham MOORE, doing business as FORT deemed necessary, applicant requests it (also from junction Massachusetts High­ WORTH TRANSFER CO., 1510 Jones be held at Oklahoma City, Okla.; Dallas, way 140 and unnumbered highway west street, Post Office Box 4089, Fort Worth, Tex.; or Memphis, Tenn. lex. 76106. Authority sought to operate of Franklin, Mass., over Massachusetts No. MC 133940, filed August 1, 1969. Highway 140 to Franklin, and thence 85 a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Applicant: EDWARD P. STROUTH, 903 over irregular routes, transporting: Cumberland Street, Bristol, Va. 24201. over Massachusetts Highway 140 to ontamerized and household goods and Applicant’s representative: Morris Honig, Bellingham) and return over the same Personal effects, between points in Tar- 150 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 10038. route. (3) Between junction of Massa­ County, Tex., on the one hand, and, Authority sought to operate as a common chusetts Highways 16 and 126 south of on the other, points in Tarrant, Dallas, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Holliston, Mass., and Bellingham, Mass.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14296 NOTICES Prom junction of Massachusetts High­ interest in and would be prejudiced by by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, ways 16 and 126 south of Holliston, the lack of proper notice of the authority transporting: Silver granules, from Her­ Mass., over Massachusetts Highway 16 to described in the findings in this decision culaneum, Mo., to points in South Am­ junction Massachusetts Highway 140 and order, a notice of the authority boy, N.J., under contract with St. Joseph near Milford, Mass, (also over Massa­ actually granted will be published in the Lead Company of New York, N.Y. Note : chusetts Highway 16 to Milford, Mass., F ederal Register and issuance of a per­ Common control may be involved. The and thence over unnumbered highway mit in this proceeding will be withheld purpose of this republication is to reflect to junction with Massachusetts Highway for a period of 30 days from the date that applicant seeks contract carrier au­ 140 near Milford, Mass.), thence over of such publication, during which period thority in lieu of common carrier au­ Massachusetts Highway 140 to Belling­ any proper party in interest may file a thority which was inadvertently shown ham, and return over the same route. petition to reopen or for other appro­ in the previous publication. (4) Between Boston, Mass., and junc­ priate relief setting forth in detail the By the Commission. tion Massachusetts Highways 16 and precise manner in which it has been so 109 near Milford, Mass, Prom Boston prejudiced. [seal] Andrew Anthony, Jr., Acting Secretary. over U.S. Highway 1 and city streets Application For Brokerage License to junction U.S. Highway 1 and Mas­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10778; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; sachusetts Highway 109, and thence No. MC 130095, filed July 30, 1969. 8:45 a.m.] over Massachusetts Highway 109 to its Applicant: ELEGANTE TOURS, INC., junction with Massachusetts Highway 16 1629 Lexington Avenue, New York, N.Y. [No. 19610 *1 near Milford, Mass., and return over the 10029. Applicant’s representative: Elias same route. (5) Between junction Inter­ Messing, 120 Broadway, New York, N.Y. ILLINOIS FREIGHT ASSOCIATION state Highway 90 and Massachusetts 10005. For a license (BMC 5) to engage in Switching Rates in the Chicago operations as a broker at New York, N.Y., Highway 128 and junction Massachu­ Switching District setts Highways 109 and 128. Prom junc­ in arranging for transportation in inter­ tion Interstate Highway 90 and Massa­ state or foreign commerce of passengers August 29, 1969. chusetts Highway 128 over Massachu­ and their baggage, both as individuals Notice is hereby given that member setts Highway 128 to its junction with and in groups, in all-expense tours to rail carriers of the Hlinois Freight As­ Massachusetts Highway 109, and return points of interest, beginning and ending sociation filed a petition with the Inter­ over the same route. (6) Between Fra­ at New York, N.Y., and extending to state Commerce Commission for modifi­ mingham, Mass., and junction Massa­ points in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, cation of the outstanding orders in these chusetts Highway 126 and unnumbered Virginia, and the District of Columbia. proceedings. The modification sought is highway south of Framingham. Prom Applications in Which Handling With­ to change the term “slag” to “slag, un­ Framingham oyer Massachusetts High­ out Oral Hearing Has Been Re­ suitable for the further extraction of way 135 to Ashland, Mass., and thence quested metals” in the tariffs named below. over unnumbered highway to its junc­ The modification sought would appear tion with Massachusetts Highway 126 No. MC 101529 (Sub-No. 3), filed in (1) items 405 and 435 of Illinois south of Framingham, and return over August 20, 1969. Applicant: VALLEY Freight Association Tariff 21-F, ICC No. the same route. (B) Irregular routes, in TRUCKING COMPANY, a corporation, 1168, (2) items 350 to 410 of Elgin, Joliet, special or charter operations. Between Morris, 111. Applicant’s representative: and Eastern Railway Company Tariff points on thè routes described In A Irving Klein, 280 Broadway, New York, 46-W, ICC No. 2384, (3) The Baltimore above, on the one hand, and, on the N.Y. 10007. Authority sought to operate and Ohio Railroad Company Tariff 467- other points in the United States. Note: as, a common carrier, by motor vehicle, B, ICC No. 24876, (4) The Baltimore and If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ over irregular routes, transporting: Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Com­ cant requests it be held at Boston, Mass. Paper, paper products, glue, paste, and pany Tariff 1-E, ICC No. 524, (5) Elgin, containers, serving the terminal site of. Applications for Freight F orwarder Joliet, and Eastern Railway Tariff 136— Cooper-Jarrett, Inc., approximately one- H, ICC No. 2403, and (6) other agency No. FF-322 (SUNPAK MOVERS, half mile West of the junction of Inter­ and individual lines tariffs naming INC.) FREIGHT FORWARDER AP­ state Highway 55 and County Line Road, similar rates between points in the PLICATION, (Republication), filed July in Du Page County, HI., as an off-route Chicago Switching District not other­ 27,1965, published in the Federal R egis­ point in connection with applicant’s wise specified by the petitioner. ter issue of August 11, 1965, and repub­ authorized regular route operations to The modification is sought to settle the lished this issue. Applicant: SUNPAK and from Chicago, HI. question of whether the present rates MOVERS, INC., 1621 Queen Anne No. MC 114290 (Sub-No. 39), filed prescribed on aggregate materials, in­ Avenue North, Seattle, Wash. Applicant’s August 7, 1969. Applicant: EXLEY EX­ cluding slag in open-top cars not cov­ attorney: Alan F. Wohlstetter, 1 Far- PRESS, INC., 2610 Southeast Eighth, ered by tarpaulin, published in the ragut Square South, Washington, D.C. Portland, Oreg. 97202. Applicant’s rep­ above-named tariffs are applicable on 20006. Upon consideration of the appli­ resentative: James T. Johnson, 1610 IBM slag having value for the further extrac­ cation as amended in the above entitled Building, Seattle, Wash. 98101. Authority tion of metal. proceedings, the examiner recommended sought to operate as a common carrier, Notice of the filing of this petition will the granting to applicant of a permit by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, be given by publication in the F ederal authorizing the freight forwarder serv­ transporting: Bananas, from Seattle, Register. ices substantially as indicated below. A Wash., to Portland, Eugene, Salem, Any persons interested in thè matter decision and order of the commission, Corvallis, Klamath Falls, Roseburg, of this petition may, on or before 30 days Review Board Number 3, dated Janu­ Coos Bay, Medford, and Bend, Oreg. from the publication of this notice in ary 21,1969, and served January 28,1969, Note: Applicant states that the re­ the Federal Register, file replies to the as modified, finds that operation by appli­ quested authority cannot be tacked with petition supporting or opposing the cant in interstate commerce, as a freight its existing authority. determination sought. An original and forwarder of used household goods, un­ No. MC 124328 (Sub-No. 37) (Correc­ 15 copies of such replies must be filed accompanied hag gage, and usèd automo­ tion), filed July 30, 1969, published in with the Commission and must show biles, between points in the United the Federal Register on August 21,1969, service of 2 copies upon Mr. John H. States, including Alaska and Hawaii, will republished as corrected, this issue. Ap­ Doeringer, attorney for petitioner, Illi­ be consistent with the public interest and plicant : BRINK’S INCORPORATED, 234 nois Central Railroad, 135 East lltn the national transportation policy. Be­ East 24th Street, Chicago, 111: 60616. cause it is possible that other persons, Applicant’s representative: F. D. Partlan 1 Embraces also No. 24950, Acme Steel Ch­ who have relied upon the notice of the (same address as above). Authority etai v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Rail­ publication as published, may have an sought' to operate as a contract carrier, way Co. et al.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTICES 14297 Place, Chicago, HI. 60605. Thereafter, a Tariff—Supplement 84 to Southern No. MC 107496 (Sub-No. 747 TA), filed determination will be made as to the dis­ Freight Association, agent, tariff ICC September 2, 1969. Applicant: RUAN position of the petition. S-417. TRANSPORT CORPORATION, Third [seal] Andrew Anthony, Jr., FSA No. 41743—Soda ash from points and Keosauqua Way, Des Moines, Iowa Acting Secretary. in Michigan and Ohio. Filed by Traffic 50309. Applicant’s representative: H. L. Executiv e Association-Eastern Rail­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10842; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; Fabritz (same address as above). Au­ 8:48 ajtn.] roads, agent (E.R. No. 2955), for inter­ thority sought to operate as a common ested rail carriers. Rates on soda ash, in carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular bulk, in covered hopper cars, in car­ routes, transporting: Liquid feed, in FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS FOR loads, as described in the application, bulk, in tank vehicles, from Sioux City, RELIEF from specified points in Michigan and Iowa, to points in South Dakota, Ne­ Ohio, to specified points in Alabama, braska, and Minnesota, for 150 days, September 8, 1969. Mississippi, and Tennessee. Supporting shipper: Kent Feeds, Inc., Protests to the granting of an appli­ Grounds for relief—Market compe­ Muscatine, Iowa 52761. Send protests to: cation must be prepared in accordance tition. Ellis L. Annett, District Supervisor, In­ with Rule 1100.40 of the general rules Tariff—Supplement 80 to Traffic Ex­ terstate Commerce Commission, Bureau of practice (49 CFR 1100.40) and filed ecutive Association-Eastern Railroads, of Operations, 677 Federal Building, Des within 15 days from the date of publica­ agent, tariff ICC C-611. Moines, Iowa 50309. tion of this notice in the F ederal By the Commission. No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 928 TA), filed Register. September 4, 1969. Applicant: CHEMI­ [seal] h . N eil Garson, Long-and-S hort H aul CAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 Secretary. East Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, FSA No. 41739—Chicken offal "between [F.R. Doc. 69-10843; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; Pa. 19335. Applicant’s representative: Points in southwestern, IF A and western 8:48 a.m.] Edwin H. van Deusen (same address as trunkline territories. Filed by Southwest­ above), Authority sought to operate as a ern Freight Bureau, agent (No. B-67), common carrier, by motor vehicle, over for interested rail carriers. Rates on [Notice 902] irregular routes, transporting: Steam chicken offal, ground, in carloads, as MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY cylinder oil, in bulk, in tank vehicles, described in the application, between AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS from Memphis, Tenn., to Freeport, Tex., points in southwestern territory, includ­ for 180 days. Supporting shipper’: The ing Mississippi River crossings Memphis, S eptember 8, 1969. Dow Chemical Co., Freeport, Tex. Tenn., and south; also between points in The following are notices of filing of 77541. Send protests to: Peter R. Guman, southwestern territory, on the one hand, applications for temporary authority District Supervisor, Interstate Commerce and points in Illinois Freight Association under section 210a(a) of the Interstate Commission, Bureau of Operations, 900 and western trunkline territories, on the Commerce Act provided for under the U.S. Customhouse, Philadelphia, Pa. other. new rules of Ex Parte No. MC-67, (49 19335. Grounds for relief—Short-line dis­ CFR Part 1131) published in the F ederal No. MC 112750 (Sub-No. 268 TA) filed tance formula and grouping. R egister, issue of April 27,1965, effective Tariffs—Supplements 30 and 139 to August 27, 1969. Applicant: AMERICAN July 1, 1965. These rules provide that COURIER CORPORATION, 2 Nevada Southwestern Freight Bureau, agent, protests to the granting of an applica­ tariffs ICC 4819 and 4690, respectively. Drive, Lake Success, N.Y. 11040. Appli­ tion must be filed with the field official cant’s representative: John M. Delany FSA No. 41740—Volcanic scoria or named in the F ederal R egister publica­ «ap from Santa Fe and Lamy, N. Mex. (same address as above). Authority tion, within 15 calendar days after the sought to operate as a contract carrier, Filed by Southwestern Freight Bureau, date of notice of the filing of the applica­ agent (No. B-77), for interested rail by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, tion is published in the F ederal R egis­ transporting: Commercial papers, docu­ carriers. Rates on volcanic scoria or slag, ter. One copy of such protests must be not pumice stone, in carloads, from Santa ments, written instruments and business served on the applicant, or its authorized records, (except currency and negotiable Fe and Lamy, N. Mex., to points in representative, if any, and the protests Illinois Freight Association and western securities), as are used in the business of must certify that such service has been banks and banking institutions; ( 1) be­ trunkline territories. made. The protests must be specific as to Grounds for relief—Market compe­ tween Roanoke, Va., on the one hand, tition. the service which such protestant can and, on the other, points in Tennessee; and will offer, and must consist of a Tariff-Supplement 139 to Southwest- (2) between Menominee, Mich., and Clin- signed original and six copies. tonville, Wis., for 180 days. Supporting 4690Freight Bureau> agent, tariff IOC A copy of the application is on file, shippers: ( 1) The First National Ex­ and can be examined at the Office of the FSA No. 41741—Newsprint paper from change Bank of Virginia, Roanoke^ Va. Secretary, Interstate Commerce Com­ 24010; (2 ) The First National Bank of Points in Canada. Filed by Traffic Execu­ mission, Washington, D.C., and also in t e Association-Eastern Railroads, Menominee, Menominee, Mich. 49858. field office to which protests are to be Send protests to: District Supervisor agent (E.R. No. 2957) , for interested rail transmitted. earners. Rates on fiewsprint paper, in Anthony Chiusano, Interstate Commerce carloads, as described in the applica­ Motor Carriers of P roperty Commission, Bureau of Operations, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, N.Y. 10007. tion from Jonquiere and St. Joseph No. MC 107295 (Sub-No. 217 TA), filed Wis rna’ Quebec, Canada, to Milwaukee, September 4, 1969. Applicant: PRE-FAB No. MC 117940 (Sub-No. 6 TA), filed TRANSIT CO., 100 South Main Street, August 29, 1969. Applicant: NATION­ titionOUndS ^0r re^e^‘—W ater compe- Farmer City, 111. 61842. Authority sought WIDE CARRIERS, INC., Post Office Box to operate as a common carrier, by motor 104, Maple Plain, Minn. 55359. Appli­ NQTariffr ^ upplement 42 to Canadian vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ cant’s representative: M. James Levitus, wi°Anal Eailways tariff ICC E.543. ing: Hardwood paneling, from Stuttgart, Nationwide Carriers, Inc., Post Office Box’ /rftm « No- 41742—Barites (Barytes) Ark., to points in New Jersey, New York, 104, Maple Plain, Minn. 55359. Authority Cartersville, Ga. Filed by O. W. Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode sought to operate as a common carrier, ¿22?’ Jr/,’ agent (No- A6127), for inter- Island, and Pennsylvania, for 180 days. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, f rai1 carriers. Rates on barites Supporting shipper: Townsend Paneling transporting: Bananas, plantains, pine­ sSvSf? > ground, in carloads, as de- Inc., Post Office Box 916, Stuttgart, Ark apples, and coconuts and agricultural viiip o ln 11116 application, from Carters- 72160. Send protests to: Harold C. Jol- commodities, otherwise exempt from eco­ L- ’ Qa., to Berwick and Morgan City, liff, District Supervisor, Interstate Com­ nomic regulations under section 203(b) merce Commission, Bureau of Opera­ (6) of the Act when transported in mixed tition°UndS f° r relief—Market compe- tions, Room 476, 325 West Adams Street, shipments with bananas, plantains, pine­ Springfield 111. 62704. apples, and coconuts, from Wilmington,

No. 174_____ s FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14298 NOTICES Del., to points in Illinois, Indiana, Michi­ Bureau of Operations, 803,1808 West End 7708, Federal Building, 300 North Los gan, Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, Building, Nashville, Tenn. 37203. Angeles Street, Los Angeles, Calif. 90012. Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin, for No. MC 125952 (Sub-No. 10 TA) , filed By the Commission. 180 days. Supporting shipper: West Allgust 29, 1969. Applicant: INTER­ tSEAL] H. N eil G arson, Indies Fruit Co., Post Office Box 1940, STATE DISTRIBUTOR CO., 8311 Secretary. Miami, Fla. 33101. Send protests to: Durango Southwest, Tacoma, Wash. {F.R. Doc. 69-10844; Filed, Sept, 10, 1969; A. N. Spath, District Supervisor, Bureau 98499. Applicant’s representative: 8:48 am.} of Operations, Interstate Commerce George R. LaBissoniere, 1424 Washing­ Commission, 448 Federal Building and ton Building, Seattle, Wash. 98101. Au­ U.S. Courthouse, 110 South Fourth thority sought to operate as a contract Street, Minneapolis, Minn. 55401. carrier, by motor vehicle,, over irregular No. MC 118959 (Sub-No. 51 TA), filed routes, transporting: Custom-cut lumber DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE August 28, 1969. Applicant: JERRY for furniture and cabinets—for the ac­ Business and Defense Services LIPPS, INC., 130 South Frederick, Cape count of Lindell Enterprises Co., from Administration Girardeau, Mo. 63701. Authority sought Tacoma, Wash., to points in California, to operate as a common carrier, by motor for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Lindell JACKSON LABORATORY vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Enterprises, 806 High Street, Bellingham, ing: Pipe, pipe fittings and couplings, Wash. 98225. Send protests to: E. J. Notice of Decision on Application for from Louisiana, Mo., to points in Ala­ Casey, District Supervisor, Bureau of Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article bama, Arkansas, Florida, Colorado, Operations, Interstate Commerce Com­ The following is a decision on an ap­ Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, mission, 6130 Arcade Building, Seattle, plication for duty-free entry of a scien­ Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Michi­ Wash. 98101. tific article pursuant to section 6 (c) of gan, Missouri, Ohio, Kansas, Nebraska, No. MC 128031 (Sub-No. 2 TA) , filed the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Oklahoma, North Carolina, Pennsyl­ August 25, 1969. Applicant; GEORGE A. Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub­ vania, South Carolina, Tennessee, West MCFARLAND, doing business as MC­ lic Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) and the Virginia, and Wisconsin, for 180 days. FARLAND TRUCKING, Box 643, Austin, regulations issued thereunder (32 F.R. Supporting shipper: Tallman Conduit Minn. 55912. Applicant’s representative: 2433 et seq.). Co., 600 South Main Street, Louisiana, Andrew R. Clark, 1000 First National A copy of the record pertaining to this Mo. 63353. Send protests to: J. P. Werth- Bank Building, Minneapolis, Minn. 55402. decision is available for public review mann, District Supervisor, Interstate Authority sought to operate as a com­ during ordinary business hours of the Commerce Commission, Bureau of Oper­ mon carrier, by motor carrier, by motor Department of Commerce, at the Scien­ ations, Room 3248, 1520 Market Street, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ tific Instrument Evaluation Division, De­ St. Louis, Mo. 63103. ing: Dairy products, dairy product sub­ partment of Commerce, Washington, No. MC 121654 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed stitutes, and citrus fruit juices, and mer­ D.C. August 29, 1969. Applicant: COASTAL chandise premiums in mixed loads with Docket No. 69-00527-33-46040. Appli­ TRANSPORT' & TRADING CO., 2700 said commodities, (1) from Rochester, cant: The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Louisville Road, Post Office Box 7177, Minn., to Buffalo Center, St. Ansgar, Harbor, Maine 04609. Article: Elec­ Savannah, Ga. 31408. Applicant’s repre­ Osage, Mason City, Charles City, North- tron microscope, Model HU-11C. Manu­ sentative: R. W. Gerson, The Commer­ wood, and Fort Dodge, Iowa, and Alden facturer: Hitachi, Ltd., Japan. Intended cial Building, Atlanta, Ga. 30303. Au­ Wells, Kiester, and Albert Lea, Minn., use of article: The article w ill be used thority sought to operate as a common with no transportation for compensation for studies to better acquaint staff mem­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular on return except as otherwise authorized; bers with the field of fine-structure routes, transporting: Natural resins, in (2) from Rochester, Minn., to Bancroft, analysis and the use of the instrument. drums, from points in Georgia to points Woden, Britt, Kanawha, Belmond, Gar­ Studies presently planned are as follows: in Chatham and Glynn Counties, Ga., for ner, Iowa, with no compensation on 180 days. Supporting shippers: Whitney return except as otherwise authorized, a. The developmental effects in the & Oettler Department, J. M. Huber Corp., for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Mari­ mouse of mutant genes causing morpho­ Post Office Box 8024, Savannah, Ga. gold Foods, Inc., 2929 University Ave­ logical abnormalities at e a rly embryonic 31404; Filtered Rosin Co., Baxley, Ga.; nue SE., Minneapolis, Minn. 55414. Send stages, J. K. Ebberwein Foreign Freight For­ protests to: A. N. Spath, District Super­ b. The development of testicular tera­ warder, Suite 208, Realty Building, Sa­ visor, Interstate Commerce Commission, tomas which occur with predictable fre­ vannah, Ga. 31402; Anderson Shipping Bureau of Operations, 448 Federal Build­ quency in an inbred strain of mice. Company of Savannah, Ga., No. 2 Whit­ ing and U.S. Courthouse, 110 South c. Studies of 12 distinct genetically aker Building, Savannah, Ga. Send pro­ Fourth Street, Minneapolis, Minn. 55401. caused anemias of mice. tests to: District Supervisor, G. H. No. MC 133984 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed d. The study of fine structure of mus­ Fauss, Jr., Bureau of Operations, Inter­ August 28, 1969. Applicant: POPPERT cle in preclinical stages of hereditary TRUCKING COMPANY, 1915 North mouse muscular dystrophy. state Commerce Commission, Box 35008, e. Studies concerning th e differences 400 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, Fla. Durfee, El Monte, Calif. 91733. Appli­ cant’s representative: Donald Murchison, in the molecular structure of transfer 32202. , . , . , RNA (sRNA) in normal and neoplastic No. MC 124117 (Sub-No. 3 TA), filed Suite 211 Paris Building, 211 South Bev­ erly Drive, Beverly .Hills, Calif. 90212; tissue of the mouse and in various other September 4, 1969. Applicant: EARL species*. FREEMAN, doing business as MID- Authority sought to operate as a contract TENN EXPRESS, Post Office Box 101, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Comments: No comments have been re­ Eagleville, .Term. 37060. Applicant’s rep­ routes, transporting: Store fixtures and ceived with respect to this application. resentative : Walter Harwood, Suite 1822, equipment crated and store fixtures and Decision: Application approved. No in­ Parkway Towers, Nashville, Tenn. 37219. equipment uncrated in mixed loads on strument or apparatus of equivalent Authority sought to operate as a common flatbed trailers between the plantsite and scientific value to the foreign article, for carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular warehouses of Hill Refrigeration Corp., such purposes as this article is intended routes, transporting: Malt beverages and located within Glendale and Burbank, to be used, is being manufactured in the related, advertising materials, from Calif., on the one hand, and, on the other, United States. Reasons: (1) The foreign Winston-Salem, N.C., to Winchester, points in Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Ne­ article provides a means for evacuating Tenn., for 180 days. Supporting shipper: vada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyo­ the specimen airlock before the specimen Anderton Distributing Co., 198 Fifth Ave­ ming, and Colorado j for 150 days. is introduced into the column. The mo** nue NE., Winchester, Tenn. 37398. Send Supporting shipper: Robert G. Harrison, closely comparable domestic electron protests to: Joe J. Tate,. District Super­ District Supervisor, Interstate Commerce microscope is the Model EMU-4B whic visor, Interstate Commerce Commission, Commission, Bureau of Operations, Room was being m anufactured by the Radi

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTI CCS 14299 Corp. of America (RCA) at the time the Washington, Pa. 19034 (NDA 11-300). initiated to withdraw approval of the applicant ordered the foreign article, but 2. Chlorzoxazone 125 milligrams and new drug applications for the above which is currently being manufactured acetaminophen 300 milligrams per tab­ mentioned drugs, pursuant to the pro­ by Forgflo Corp. (Forgflo). In the domes­ let (Parafon) ; Chlorzoxazone 250 milli­ visions of section 505(e) of the Federal tic electron microscope, the airlock is not grams and acetaminophen 300 milli­ Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. With­ evacuated before introducing the speci­ grams per tablet '(Parafon Forte) ; drawal of approval of the applications men, thus requiring the cutoff of the high marketed by McNeil Laboratories, Inc. will cause any such drugs on the market voltage with each specimen change and (NDA 11-529). to be new drugs for which an approval is a restabilization of the high voltage 3. Chlorzoxazone 125 milligrams, co­ not in effect. after it is restored. We are advised deine phosphate 15 milligrams, and The above-named holder of the new by the Department of Health Education, acetaminophen 300 milligrams per tab­ drug applications for these drugs has and W elfare (HEW) in its memo­ let (Parafon with Codeine) ; marketed been mailed a copy of the NAS-NRC re­ randum of June 25, 1969, that the pro­ by McNeil Laboratories, Inc. (NDA 11- port. Any interested person may obtain cedures inherent in the domestic electron 985). a copy of these reports by writing to microscope would affect the accomplish­ 4. Chlorzoxazone 125 milligrams, the office named below. ment of the research objectives of the acetaminophéh 300 milligrams and pred­ Communications forwarded in re­ program in which th e foreign article is nisolone 1 milligram per tablet (Parafon sponse to this announcement should be intended to be used. (2) The foreign ar­ with Prednisolone)' ; marketed by McNeil identified with the reference number, ticle permits a continuous change from Laboratories, Inc. (NDA 11-528). DESI 11-300, and be directed to the at­ 400 to 500,000 magnifications without the These drugs are regarded as new drugs. tention of the following appropriate of­ need to change pole pieces, whereas the The Food and Drug Administration’s fice and addressed to the Pood and Drug domestic instrument requires a change conclusions as to their effectiveness Administration, 200 C Street, SW., in pole pieces to produce distortion-free classification and marketing status are Washington, D.C. 20204: micrographs. We are also advised by described below. HEW that the 5-minute delay required - A. Effectiveness classification. 1. On Bequests for NAS-NRC reports: Press Rela­ each time the pole piece was changed, the basis of the Academy reports the tions Office (CE—300). Supplements (identify with NDA number) : which also involves breaking the vacuum articles containing chlorzoxazone with Office of Marketed Drugs (MD-300), Bu­ in the column, would tend to affect the acetaminophen, and with acetaminophen reau of Medicine. specimen and thus impair the achieve­ and prednisolone or codeine phosphate Original new-drug applications: Office of ment of the purposes for which the for­ are considered to be possibly effective for New Drugs (MD-100). Bureau of Medicine. eign article is intended to be used. all of their labeled indications. AU other communications regarding this For the foregoing reasons, we find that 2. Chlorzoxazone alone has been eval­ announcement: Special Assistant for Drug Efficacy Study Implementation (MD-16), the RCA Model EMU—4B is not of equiv­ uated as lacking substantial evidence of Bureau of Medicine. alent scientific value to the foreign ar­ effectiveness for reducing spasticity asso­ ticle for such purposes as this article is ciated with neurological disease and This notice is issued pursuant to the intended to be used. traumatic spinal cord injuries. For its provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and The Department of Commerce knows other labeled indications it has been Cosmetic Act (secs. 502, 505, 52 Stat. of no other instrument or apparatus of evaluated as possibly effective. 1050-53, as amended; 21 U.S.C. 352, 355) equivalent scientific value to the foreign B. Marketing status, 1. Holders ofand under the authority delegated to the article, for the purposes for which such previously approved new drug applica­ Commissioner of Food and Drugs (21 article is intended to be used, which is tions and any person marketing any such CFR 2.120). being manufactured in the United States. drug without approval will be allowed 6 Dated: August 28,1969. months from the date of publication of Charley M. D enton, W inton B. R ank in, Assistant Administrator for In­ this announcement in the Federal R eg­ ister to obtain and to submit in a sup­ Deputy Commissioner dustry Operations, Business of Food and Drugs. and Defense Services Admin­ plemental or original new drug applica­ istration. tion data to provide substantial evidence [F.R. Doc. 69-10822; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; of effectiveness for those indications for 8:46 a.m.] [F.R. Doc. 69-10819; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; which these drugs have been classified as 8:46 a.m.] possibly effective: Provided, That, in re­ gard to chlorzoxazone alone, the claim [DESI 2853], for which substantial evidence of effec­ CERTAIN SULFATHIAZOLE- tiveness is lacking (as described in para­ CONTAINING DRUGS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDU­ graph A above) is deleted within 60 days of the date of this publication. The holder Drugs for Human Use; Drug Efficacy CATION, AND WELFARE of the previously approved application Study Implementation for chlorzoxazone alone (Paraflex) is re­ Food and Drug Administration quested to submit within the 60-day The Food and Drug Administration [DESI 11-300] period a supplement containing revised has evaluated reports received from the labeling deleting the claim. The supple­ National Academy of Sciences-National CHLORZOXAZONE BY ITSELF OR IN ment should be submitted under the Research Council, Drug Efficacy Study COMBINATION WITH ACETAMINO­ provisions of 130.9 (d) and (e) of the Group, on the following sulfonamide- PHEN; CODEINE PHOSPHATE AND new-drug regulations (21 CFR 130.9 (d), containing drugs for systemic use. (e) ) which permit certain changes to be 1. Coco-Sulfonamides Triplex Sus­ ACETAMINOPHEN; OR PREDNISO­ pension; each 5 cc. containing 0.167 LONE AND ACETAMINOPHEN put into effect at the earliest possible time. Failure to do so may result in a gram each of sulfathiazole, sulfadiazine, Drugs for Human Use; Drug Efficacy proposal to withdraw approval of the and sulfamerazine; Eli Lilly and Co., new drug application. Post Office Box 618, Indianapolis, Ind Study Implementation 46206 (NDA 6-317). u F00^ and Drug Administration 2. At the end of the 6-month period 2. Sulfonamides Triplex Tablets; 0.167 as evataated reports received from the any data submitted will be evaluated gram each of sulfathiazole, sulfadiazine, Roo aI Academy of Sciences-National to determine whether there is substantial and sulfamerazine; Eli Lilly and Co «eseareh council, Drug Efficacy Study evidence of effectiveness of the drugs for (NDA 6-317). ant* °tker available evidence on such uses. After the evaluation, the con­ 3. Sulfathiazole, 0.5 gram per tablet; we following drugs: clusions concerning the drugs will be Eli Lilly and Co. (NDA 2-853). published in the F ederal R egister. If no tflhi^p^^oxazone 250 milligrams per 4. Sulfathiazole, 0.5 gram per tablet; studies have been undertaken or if the Bowman, Meli and Co., 1334-48 Howard wet (Paraflex); marketed by McNeil studies do not provide substantial evi­ aooratories, Inc., Camp Hill Road, Fort Street, Harrisburg, Pa. 17105 (NDA dence of effectiveness, procedures will be 4-734).

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14300 NOTICES 5. Sulfathiazole, 0.5 gram per tablet;505, 52 Stafc. 1050-53, as amended; 21 reconstitution and intravenous admin­ The Vale Chemical Co., Inc., 1201 Lib­ U.S.C. (352, 355)) and under authority istration and contain per dosage unit an erty Street, Allentown, Pa. 18102 (NDA delegated to the Commissioner (21 CFR amount appropriate for administration 3-583). 2.120). as described in the labeling conditions in this announcement. The Academy commented that the Dated: September 4,1969. Imbalance between benefit and risk of C. Labeling conditions. 1. The label serious untoward effects with sulfathia­ H e r b e r t L . L e t , J r ., bears the statement “Caution: Federal zole does not warrant its continued use Commissioner of Food and Drugs. law prohibits dispensing without inasmuch as other available sulfonam­ [FH. Doc. 69-10823; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; prescription.” ides have equivalent benefit and much 8:46 am.} 2. The drug is labeled to comply with less risk. The Academy also observed that all requirements of the Act and regu­ lations and those parts of its labeling in­ the incidence of serious reactions (in­ [DESI 7600} cluding renal complications, rash, fever, dicated below are substantially as fol­ blood dyscrasias, and liver damage) is ULTRASHORT ACTION BARBITURATES: lows: (Optional additional information, 18.6 percent for sulfathiazole versus 6.5 SODIUM METHOHEXITAL AND applicable to the drug, may be proposed under other appropriate paragraph percent for sulfadiazine. The Pood and SODIUM THIAMYLAL Drug Adm inistration concludes that headings and should follow the informa­ there is a lack of evidence that the ef­ Drugs for Human Use; Drug Efficacy tion set forth below.) fectiveness of sulfathiazole is sufficient Study Implementation S odium M ethohexital to justify its use systemically in view of known serious hazards associated with The Pood and Drug Administration has such use. Accordingly, the Commissioner evaluated reports received from the Na­ warning intends to initiate proceedings to with­ tional Academy of Sciences-National Re­ search Council, Drug Efficiency Study This drug should be administered draw approval of the above-listed new by persons qualified in the use of drug applications and all other new Group, on the following ultrashort acting barbiturates for intravenous injection: intravenous anesthetics and with drug applications for drugs which con­ the ready availability of appropri­ tain sulfathiazole for systemic use in 1. Sodium Methohexital, marketed as Brevital Sodium Ampoules, containing ate resuscitative equipment for man. prevention and treatment of anes­ Prior to initiating such action, how­ 500 mg., 2.5 grams, and 5 grams of sodium ever, the Commissioner invites the hold­ methohexital, by Eli Lilly and Co., Indi­ thetic emergencies. anapolis, 2nd. 46206 (NDA 11—559); and ers of new drug applications for such 2. Sodium Thiamylal, marketed as Su- sulfathiazole-containing drugs and any DESCRIPTION interested person who may be adversely rital in ampoules and vials containing affected by the removal of such articles 0.5 Gm., 1 Gm., 5 Gm„ and 10 Gm. of (Descriptive information to be in­ from the market to submit any perti­ sodium thiamylal, by Parke, Davis and cluded by the manufacturer or distrib­ nent data bearing on the proposal within Co., Detroit, Mich. 48232 (NDA 7-600). utor should be confined to an appropri­ 30 days after publication of this notice The drugs are regarded as new drugs ate description of the physical and chem­ in the Federal R egister. The only ma­ (21 U.S.C. 321 (p)). Supplemental new ical properties of the drug and the terial which will be considered accept­ drug applications are required to revise formulation.) able for review must be well-organized the labeling and to update previously ap­ ACTIONS and consist of adequate and well-con­ proved applications providing for such Sodium methohexital is a rapid, trolled studies bearing on both the safety drugs. A new drug application is required ultrashort acting barbiturate anesthetic and efficacy of the products, and not from any person marketing such drugs agent. previously submitted. without approval. The Pood and Drug Administration is INDICATIONS This announcement of the proposed prepared to approve new drug applica­ For induction of anesthesia, for sup­ action and implementation of the NAS- tions and supplements to previously ap­ plementing other anesthetic agents, as NRC reports for these drugs is made to proved new drug applications under con­ intravenous anesthesia for short surgical give notice to persons who might be ad­ ditions described in this announcement. procedures with minimal painful stimuli, versely affected by their withdrawal from or as an agent for inducing a hypnotic the market. Promulgation of any order ' Sodium M ethohexital and state. withdrawing approval of the new drug Sodium T hiamylal applications will cause any such drug on the market to be a new drug for which A. Effectiveness classification. 1. The Sodium methohexital is contraindi­ an approved new drug application is not Pood and Drug Administration has Con­ cated when general anesthesia is con­ in effect and w ill make it subject to regu­ sidered the Academy reports, and addi­ traindicated, in patients with latent or latory action. tional available evidence, and concludes manifest porphyria, or in patients with The above-named holders of the sub­ that sodium methohexital is effective as a known hypersensitivity to barbiturates. ject new drug applications have been an intravenous anesthetic agent for short surgical procedures, for the induction of WARNINGS mailed a copy of the NAS-NRC report, anesthesia, in combination with other Repeated and continuous infusi°^ and any interested person may obtain a may cause cumulative effects resulting copy on request from the office named agents for more prolonged anesthesia, and for inducing a hypnotic state. In prolonged somnolence, respiratory below. and circulatory depression. Communications forwarded in re­ 2. The Pood and Drug Administration sponse to this announcement should refer also concludes on the basis of the NAS- Usage in pregnancy: Safe use of NRC, Drug Efficacy Study Group reports sodium methohexital has not been estab­ to DESI No. 2853 which identifies this lished with respect to adverse effects announcement and should be directed to and other available evidence that sodium thiamylal is effective as an intravenous upon fetal development. Therefore, the following appropriate office and ad­ anesthetic agent for short surgical pro­ sodium methohexital should not be usea dressed to the Pood and Drug Adminis­ cedures, for the induction of anesthesia, In women of childbearing potential an tration, 200 C Street SW., Washington, in combination with other agents for particularly during early pregnancy un­ D.C. 20204: more prolonged anesthesia, and for in­ less in the judgment of the physician tn Request for NAS-NRC report: Press Rela­ ducing a hypnotic state. expected benefits outweigh the potential tions Office (CE—300). All other communications regarding this an­ Sodium thiamylal is regarded as pos­ hazards. nouncement: Special Assistant for Drug sibly effective for its recommended use Efficacy Study Implementation (MD-16), in terminating convulsions of unknown Respiratory depression, apnea, 0 Bureau of Medicine. cause. hypotension m ay occur due to variations This announcement is issued pursuant B. Form of the drug. Sodium metho­ hexital and sodium thiamylal prepara­ in tolerance from individual to indivi u to the provisions of the Federal Pood, or to physical status of patient. Cau Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sections 502, tions are in dry sterile form suitable for

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTICES 14301

should be exercised in debilitated pa­ ACTIONS above as possibly effective (not included tients, or those with impaired function in the labeling conditions in paragraph of respiratory, circulatory, renal, hepatic, Sodium thiamylal is a rapid, ultra- short acting barbiturate anesthetic C) may continue to be used for 6 and endocrine system s. agent. • months following the date of this publi­ Sodium methohexital should be used cation to allow additional time within with extreme caution in patients in INDICATIONS which holders of previously approved ap­ status asthmaticus. For induction of anesthesia, for supple­ plications or persons marketing the drug Extravascular injection may cause menting other anesthetic agents, as in­ without approval may obtain and submit pain, swelling, ulceration and necrosis. travenous anesthesia for short surgical to the Food and Drug Administration Intraarterial injection is dangerous and procedures with minimal painful stimuli, data to provide substantial evidence of may produce gangrene of an extrem ity. or as mi agent for inducing a hypnotic effectiveness. state. E. Marketing status. Marketing of the ADVERSE REACTIONS CONTRAINDICATIONS drugs may continue under the conditions The following reactions have been Sodium thiamylal is contraindicated described in paragraphs F and G of this reported: when general anesthesia is contraindi­ announcement except that those claims Circulatory depression, thrombo­ cated, in patients with latent or manifest referenced in paragraph D may continue phlebitis, pain at injection site, respira­ porphyria, or in patients with a known to be used as described therein. tory depression including apnea, Iaryngo- hypersensitivity to barbiturates. F. Previously marketed applications. spasm, bronchospasm, salivation, h ic­ 1. Each holder of a “deemed approved” cups, skeletal muscle hyperactivity WARNINGS riew drug application (i.e., an application (twiching to convulsive-like movements), (This section should be the same which became effective on the basis of emergence delerium, headache, injury to as the “Warnings” section for Sodium safety prior to Oct. 10, 1962) for such nerves adjacent to injection site, skin Methohexital.) drug is requested to seek approval of the rashes, urticaria, nausea, and emesis. claims of effectiveness and bring the ap­ PRECAUTIONS plication into conformance by submitting DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION (This section should be the same supplements containing: The dosage is individualized according as the “Precautions” section for Sodium a. Revised labeling as needed to con­ to the patient’s response. Methohexital.) form to the labeling conditions described Sterile water for injection is the pre­ herein for the drug. ferred diluent for preparation o f I per­ ADVERSE REACTIONS b. Adequate data to assure the biologic cent solutions of sodium methohexital. The following adverse reactions have availability of the drug in the formula­ Solutions of sodium methohexital are been reported: tion which is marketed; if such data are incompatible with acid solutions of salts Circulatory depression, thrombophle­ already included in the application, such as atropine sulfate, d-tubocurarine, bitis, pain at injection site, respiratory specific reference thereto may be made. succinylcholine chloride, and scopola­ depression including apnea/ Iaryngo- c. Updating information as needed to mine hydrobromide. spasm, bronchospasm, salivation, 'hic­ make the application current in regard Sodium methohexital cannot be re­ cups, emergence delerium, headache, to item s 6 (components), 7 (com posi­ constituted with Ringer’s Solution or injury to nerves adjacent to injection tion), and 8 (methods, facilities, and solutions containing bacteriostatic or site, skin raches, urticaria, nausea, and controls) of the new drug application other substances which may interact emesis. form FD 356H to the extent described in with the agent, the proposal for abbreviated new drug DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION applications, § 130.4(f), published in the A 1 percent solution is recommended The dosage is individualized according F e d e r a l R e g is t e r February 27, 1969. for induction of anesthesia as well as for (One supplement may contain all the in­ maintenance by intermittent intravenous to the patient’s response. Sterile water for injection is the pre­ formation described in this paragraph.) drip. A dilute solution (0.2%) may be 2. Such supplements should be sub­ used for continuous drip for mainte­ ferred diluent for preparation of I percent solutions of sodium thiamylal. mitted within the following time periods nance; for th is dilution, either 5 percent after the date of publication of this notice glucose or isotonic sodium chloride Solutions of sodium thiamylal are incom­ patible with acid solutions of salts such in th e F ed e r a l R e g i s t e r : should be used instead of distilled water a. 60 days for revised labeling. The in order to avoid extreme hypotonicity. as atropine sulfate, d-tubocurarine, and succinylcholine chloride. supplement should be submitted under Sodium methohexital Is stable in the provisions of section 130.9 (d) and Sterile Water for Injection at room Sodium thiamylal cannot be reconsti­ tuted with Ringer’s Solution or solutions (e) of the new drug regulations (21 CFR temperature for approximately 6 weeks; containing bacteriostatic or other sub­ 130.9) which permit certain changes to where diluted w ith 5 percent Dextrose be put into effect at the earliest possible ‘Option or isotonic sodium chloride ln- stances which may interact with the tim e. jectton it is stable for approximately 24 agent. A 2 Yz percent solution is recommended b. 180 days for biologic availability for induction of anesthesia as well as for data. S odium Thiamylal maintenance by intermittent intravenous c. 60 days for updating information. drip. A dilute solution (0.3%) may be 3. Marketing of the drug may con­ tinue until the supplemental applications WARNING used for continuous drip for mainte­ nance; for this dilution, either 5 percent submitted in accord with the preceding This drug should be administered glucose or isotonic sodium chloride paragraphs 1. and 2. are acted upon, by persons qualified in the use of should be used instead of distilled water provided that within 60 days after the intravenous anesthetics and with in order to avoid extreme hypotonicity. date of this publication, the labeling of the ready availability of appropri­ the preparation shipped within the ate resuscitative equipment for Sodium thiamylal solutions should be jurisdiction of the Act is in accord with prepared under aseptic conditions. Solu­ the labeling conditions described in this Prevention and treatment of an­ tions should not be heated for sterili­ esthetic emergencies. announcement. (It may continue to in­ zation. Preferably sodium thiam ylal clude the indication referenced In para­ solutions should be kept in a cool place, graph D for the period stated.) protected from excessive exposure to light DESCRIPTION G. New applications. and air and should be used within 24 I. Any other person who distributes or h^^^P tive information to be included hours after preparation. Only clear solu­ intends to distribute such drug which is 1 manufacturer or distributor tions should be administered. intended for the conditions of use for ^ confined to an appropriate de- D. Claims permitted during extendedwhich it has been shown to be effective, of the physical and chemical period for obtaining substantial evidence. as described under A above, should sub­ Those claims for which the drug sodium mit an abbreviated new drug application KSX,? 468 and the thiamylal is described in paragraph A meeting the conditions specified in the

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14302 NOTICES proposed regulation, § 130.4(f) (1), (2), and addressed to the Food and Drug ments, the Commission has determined and (3), published in the F ederal Administration, 200 C Street SW., Wash­ that the conditions specified in Safe­ Register of February 27, 1969. Such ap­ ington, D.C.20204: guards Amendment No. 1 are to be plications should include proposed Bequests for NAS-NRC report: Press Rela­ incorporated in License No. CSF-1 as labeling which is in accord with the label­ tions Office (CE-300). provided in 10 CFR § 70.32(c) of the ing conditions described herein and Supplements (identify with NDA number) : Commission’s regulations. adequate data to assure the biologic Office of Marketed Drugs (MD-300), Bureau The Commission has found that the availability of the drug in the formu­ of Medicine. information provided by NFS in letters lation which is marketed or proposed for Original (abbreviated) new drug applica­ dated August 15, 1968, March 6, 1969, marketing. tions: Office of Marketed Drugs (MD-300), and July 11, 1969, regarding the safe­ Bureau of Medicine. guarding of special nuclear material 2. Distribution of any such prepara­ All other communications regarding this an­ tion currently on the market without an nouncement: Special Assistant for Drug complies with the requirements of the approved new drug application may be Efficacy'Study Implementation (MD-16), Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, continued provided that: Bureau of Medicine. and the Commission’s regulations pub­ a. Within 60 days from the date of lished in 10 CFR, Chapter I. The Com­ publication of this announcement in the This notice is issued pursuant to the mission has made findings regarding the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, F ederal R egister, the labeling of such information provided which are set forth preparation shipped within the jurisdic­ and Cosmetic Act (secs. 502, 505, 52 Stat. in the amendment, and has concluded tion of the Act is in accord with the 1050-53, as amended; 21 U.S.C. 352, 355) that the issuance of the amendment will labeling conditions described herein. (It and under the authority delegated to the not be inimical to the common defense may continue to include the indication Commissioner of Food and Drugs (21 and security or the health and safety of referenced in paragraph D for the period CFR 2.120). the public. stated.) Dated: September 4, 1969. Within fifteen (15) days from the b. The manufacturer, packer, or dis­ date of publication of the notice in the H erbert L. L e y , Jr., F ederal R egister, the licensees may file tributor of such drug submits, within 180 Commissioner of Food and Drugs. days from the date of this publication, a a request for a hearing and any person new drug application to the Food and [F.R. Doc. 69-10824; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; whose interest may be affected by this Drug Administration. 8:46 a.m.] proceeding may file a petition for leave c. The applicant submits additional to intervene. Requests for a hearing and information that may be required for the petitions to intervene shall be filed in approval of the application within a rea­ accordance with the Commission’s rules sonable time as specified in a written ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION of practice in 10 CFR Fart 2. If a request communication from the Food and Drug [Docket No. 50-201] for a hearing or a petition for leave to Administration. intervene is filed within the time pre­ d. The application has not been ruled NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES, INC., AND scribed in this notice, the Commission incomplete or unapprovable. NEW YORK STATE ATOMIC AND will issue a notice of hearing or an ap­ H. Unapproved use or form of drug. SPACE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY propriate order. 1. If the article is labeled or advertised For further details with respect to this for use in any condition other than those Notice of Issuance of Safeguards amendment, see the amendment to the provided for in this announcement, it Amendment to Provisional Oper­ Provisional Operating License, which is may be regarded as an unapproved new ating License available for public inspection at the drug subject to regulatory proceedings Commission’s Public Document Room at until such recommended use is approved The Atomic Energy Commission has is­ 1717 H Street NW., Washington, D.C. in a new drug application, or is other­ sued, effective as of the date of issuance, Safeguards Amendment No. 1 to Provi­ Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 4th day wise in accord with this announcement. sional Operating License No. CSF-1, of September 1969. . 2. If the article is proposed for market­ dated April 19, 1966. The license author­ For the Atomic Energy Commission. ing in another form or for use other than izes Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. (NFS), the use provided for in this announce­ and New York State Atomic and Space R. P. Wischow, ment, appropriate additional informa­ Development Authority to operate the Director, Division of tion as described in § 130.4 or § 130.9 of irradiated nuclear fuel processing plant Nuclear Materials Safeguards. the regulations (21CFR 130.4,130.9) may located at the Western New York Nuclear [F.R. Doc. 69-10803; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; be required, including results of animal Service Center in Cattaraugus and Erie 8:45 a.m.] and clinical tests intended to show Counties, N.Y. whether the drug is safe and effective. By letters dated August 15, 1968, and [Docket No. 50-208] Representatives of the Administration March 6, 1969, pursuant to 10 CFR TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY are willing to meet with any interested §§ 70.22(b)(2) and 70.51(c)(2) of the person who desires to have a conference Commission’s regulations, NFS identified IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK concerning proposed changes in the la­ the fundamental material controls which Issuance of Operating License beling set forth herein. Requests for such were considered essential for assuring meetings should be made to the Office that special nuclear material in its pos­ In a notice of hearing published in the of Marketed Drugs (MD-300) at the ad­ session under License No. CSF-1 would F ederal R egister on June 28, 1969 (34 dress given below, within 30 days after be adequately safeguarded. By letters F.R. 10011), a hearing was scheduled be­ the publication of this notice in the dated April 29,1969, and June 6,1969, the fore an Atomic Safety and Licensing F ederal R egister. Commission provided NFS with copies of Board to consider the issuance of an op­ A copy of the NAS-NRC report has a proposed safeguards amendment to Li­ erating license to the Trustees of Colum­ been furnished to each firm referred to cense No. CSF-1 for comment. The bia University for a “Triga Mark II’ above. Any other manufacturer, packer, proposed safeguards amendment incor­ type research reactor to be located on or distributor of a drug of similar com­ porated the fundamental material con­ the Columbia University campus in position and labeling to the drugs listed trols identified by NFS and such other upper Manhattan, New York City. By a in this announcement or any other inter­ material control procedures as the Com­ subsequent notice, the hearing date has ested person may obtain a copy by re­ mission determined to be essential for the been scheduled for September 23, 1969 quest to the appropriate office named safeguarding of special nuclear material. (34 F.R. 12970; August 9,1969). below. By letter of July 11, 1969, NFS provided Following the issuance of these notices, Communications forwarded in re­ comments on the proposed license the Commission amended Part 2 of its sponse to this announcement should be amendment. After consideration of the regulations (10 CFR Part 2), effective 30 identified with the reference number, fundamental material controls submitted days after publication in the Federal DESI 7600, and be directed to the atten­ by NFS and the comments received from R egister on August. 19, 1969 (34 F.R- tion of the following appropriate office NFS on the proposed safeguards amend­ 13360), to provide for the establishment

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTICES 14303 of an Atomic Safety and Licensing Ap­ [Docket No. 21101] The rate in Order E-25610, August 28, peal Board. The Appeal Board w ill ex­ 1967, for the air transportation of prior­ ercise the authority and perform the re­ CHICAGO-BALTTMORE NONSTOP SERVICE INVESTIGATION ity mail was established by the Board in view functions which would otherwise the Domestic Service Mail Rate Investi­ have been exercised and performed by Notice of Prehearing Conference gation. We propose to establish a service the Commission in the categories of rate for the air transportation of prior­ licensing proceedings set forth in the Notice is hereby given that a prehear­ ity mail by Travel-Air at the level estab­ amendments. Among the foregoing, are ing conference in the above-entitled lished in Order E-25610, as amended, and proceedings on applications for licenses matter is assigned to be held on Octo­ the terms and provisions of that order under Part 50 (10 CFR Part 50) - for ber 7, 1969, at 10 am., e.d.s.t., in Room also shall be applicable to Travel-Air in facilities as to which the Commission has 726, Universal Building, 1825 Connecti­ the same manner as they were applicable made an arrangement for financial cut Avenue NW., Washington, D.C., be­ to Allegheny in providing mail services assistance pursuant to section 31 of the fore Examiner Robert M. Johnson. between the specified points. Atomic Energy Act, or has waived Requests for evidence, proposed issues, An open-rate situation has existed for charges for use of special nuclear m a­ stipulations, procedural dates, and state­ the air transportation of nonpriority terial pursuant to section 53 c.(4) of the ments of position shall be filed with the mail since April 6, 1967, when the Post Act. (Section 2.785 (a) (3) of 10 CFR examiner and other parties by the Bu­ Office petitioned for new nonpriority mail Part 2, as amended.) reau of Operating Rights on or before rates in Docket 18381. The rates cur­ By prior contract with the Trustees of September 26, 1969; other parties of rently being paid air carriers (including Columbia University, the Commission record will file on or before October 2, Allegheny) for the transportation of has an arrangem ent for financial assist­ 1969. nonpriority mail, established by Order ance and waiver of special nuclear m a­ Dated at Washington, D.C., Septem­ E-17255, July 31,1961, in the Nonpriority terial use charges for the subject re­ ber 8,1969. Mail Rate Case, are subject to such retro­ search reactor. In view thereof, the active adjustment to April 6,1967, as the Appeal Board will, under the amended [ seal] T homas L. W renn, final decision in Docket 18381 may pro­ Commission regulations, exercise the Chief Examiner. vide. Since it is equitable that Travel-Air authority and perform the review func­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10837; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; receive the same compensation as Alle­ tions which would otherwise have been 8:47 a.m.] gheny for the same services, we propose exercised and performed by the Com­ to establish temporary service rates for mission with regard to the subject [Docket No. 21285, Docket No. 18381; Order nonpribrity mail for Travel-Air at the 69-9-21] level established in Order E-17255, as proceeding. amended. We will also make Travel-Air In accordance with the amended reg­ TRAVEL-AIR AVIATION, INC. a party to the proceedings in Docket ulations, the Appeal Board w ill be com­ 18381 so the temporary nonpriority mail Order To Show Cause Regarding rates established herein will be subject to posed of the Chairman and Vice Chair­ Nonpriority Mail Rates man of the Atomic Safety and Licensing any retroactive adjustment ordered in that proceeding. Board Panel and a third member, who Issued under delegated authority The Board finds it in the public inter­ is technically qualified, designated by September 4,1969. Travel-Air Aviation, Inc. (Travel-Air), est to fix and determine the fair and rea­ the Commission. The Commission has is an air taxi operator providing services sonable rates of compensation to be paid designated Dr. Lawrence Quarles, Dean pursuant to Part 298 of the Board’s to Travel-Air Aviation, Inc., by the Post­ of the School of Engineering and Applied economic regulations. By Order 69-9-4, master General for the air transporta­ Science, the University o f Virginia, as adopted September 2, 1969, the Board tion of mail, and the facilities used the third member for this proceeding. approved Agreement CAB 21123 between and useful therefor, and the services Allegheny Airlines, Inc. CAllegheny), and connected therewith, between Elkins, Dated: September 8,1969. Travel-Air which contemplates that Charleston, and Morgantown, W. Va., By the Commission. Travel-Air will discharge Allegheny's Pittsburgh, Pa., Baltimore, Md., and certificate obligation to serve Elkins, W. Washington, D.C. Upon consideration of W. B. M cCqol, Va., through the operation of small air­ the petition, the answer of the Post­ Secretary. craft between Elkins, Charleston, and master General, and other matters offi­ [PR. Doc. 69-10880; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; Morgantown, W. Va., Pittsburgh, Pa., cially noticed, the Board proposes to issue 8:48 a.m.] Baltimore, Md., and Washington, D.C. an order* to include the following find­ No service mail rate is currently in ings and conclusions: effect for this service by Travel-Air. By 1. The fair and reasonable final serv­ petition filed August 6, 1969, Travel-Air ice mail rates to be paid on and after CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD requested the establishment of service September 2, 1969, to Travel-Air Avi­ [Docket No. 21237J mail rates for the transportation of ation, Jnc., pursuant to section 406 of priority and nonpriority mail by air be­ the Act, for the transportation of pri­ CESKOSLOVENSKE AEROLINIE ICSA) tween the above points. Travel-Air re­ ority mail by aircraft, the facilities used Notice of Hearing quests that the multielement rates and useful therefor, and the services established in Orders E-25610 and connected therewith between Elkins, Notice is hereby given pursuant to th€ E-I7255, which provided for payments to Charleston, and Morgantown, W. Va., Federal Aviation A ct o f 1958, as Allegheny be made applicable to this Pittsburgh, Pa., Baltimore, Md., and tended, that a hearing in the above- route. On August 26,1969, the Postmaster Washington, D.C. shall be the rates es­ entitled proceeding is assigned to be held General filed a late answer in support of tablished by the Board in Order E-25610, Allegheny’s petition .1 August 28, 1967, and shall be subject to Jf1 October 13, 1969, at 10 a.m., d.s.t., in the other provisions of that order; Room 911, Universal Building, 1825 Con­ 2. The fair and reasonable temporary necticut Avenue NW„ Washington, D .C 1 The present rates are as follows r Priority Mail by Air: 24 cents per ton-mile service mail rates to be paid on and after ore the undersigned examiner. plus 9.36 cents per pound at Elkins and Morgantown, 4.68 cents per pound at Charles­ ber>5t1969t Washington* D c -. Septem- •As tills order to show cause is not a final ton; and 2.34 cents per pound at Pittsburgh, action but merely provides for interested per­ Baltimore, and Washington. sons to be heard on the matters herein pro­ fsEAt^ John E. F aulk, Nonpriority Mail by Air: 15.115 cents per posed, it Is not subject to the review provi­ Hearing Examiner. ton-mile plus 4.98 cents per pound at Elkina sions of Part 385 (14 CFR, Part 385). Those and 3.32 cents per pound at Morgantown and provisions will apply to any final action taken Doc. 69-10836; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; 1.66 cents per pound at Pittsburgh, Balti­ 8:47 a.m.I by the staff in this matter under authority more, Washington, and Charleston. delegated in section 385.14(g).

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. T74— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, T969 , 14304 NOTICES

September 2,1969 to Travel-Air Aviation, [Docket No. 21386, Order 69-9-30} cisco. No justification has been submit­ Inc., pursuant to section 406 of the Act UNITED AIR LINES, INC. ted for the cancellations. for the transportation of nonpriority The Board's origin and destination mail by aircraft, the facilities used and Order of Investigation and Suspen­ surveys indicate that a substantial useful therefor, and the services connect­ sion Regarding Fare Revisions amount of traffic in the six affected mar­ ed therewith between Elkins, Charles­ kets travels via San Francisco and thus ton, and Morgantown, W. Va., Pittsburgh, Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics utilizes the fares United proposes to Pa., Baltimore, Maryland, and Wash­ Board at its office in Washington, D.C., cancel. In the absence of these fares, ington, D.C. shall be the rates established on the 5th day of September 1969. passengers traveling via San Francisco by the Board in Order E-17255, July 31, By tariff revisions1 marked to become would be required to pay a combination 1961, as amended, subject to any retro­ effective September 15, 1969, United Air of local fares which would exceed present active adjustment made in Docket 18381; Lines, Inc. (United), proposes a general fares by $22 in first-class service and $19 and revision of its normal first-class and in coach service. On the other hand, in 3. The service mail rates here fixedcoach' fares, based on the following many of the markets involved there is and determined are to be paid entirely formulas: no through service to which the direct by the Postmaster General. Coach Fares would be based on a route fare would apply, and passengers Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal terminal charge of $11 plus 5.7 cents per must utilize connecting flights generally Aviation Act of 1958 and particularly m ile. at Chicago or Denver if they are to sections 204(a) and 406 thereof, and reg­ First-Class Fares would be based on obtain that fare. In these circumstances, ulations promulgated in 14 CFR Part 302 120 percent of the constructed coach fare the Board believes that passengers and 14 CFR 385.14(f), or the existing first-class/coach ratio, traveling in these markets should have It is ordered, That: whichever is higher. available the large number of flights to 1. All interested persons and particu­ Corresponding changes, based on pres­ and from San Francisco, without being larly Travel-Air Aviation, Inc., the Post­ ent discount relationships, would be required to pay the substantially higher master General, and Allegheny Airlines, made to the various promotional fares. combination of local fares. Inc., are directed to show cause why the United also proposes to cancel all of its Furthermore, United’s proposal ap­ Board should not adopt the foregoing night coach fares and a number of other pears inconsistent with the rather wide­ proposed findings and conclusions and normal fares. spread practice of common faring points along the west coast from paints in toe fix, determine, and publish the final and The Board heard oral argument re­ temporary rates specified above, as the east and may result in certain inequities. garding United’s filing and the filings of For example, while passengers destined fair and reasonable rates of compensa­ other carriers on September 4, 1969, and tion to be paid to Travel-Air Aviation, to Medford may use connecting service the matter is now under consideration. at San Francisco, they are charged toe Inc., for the transportation of priority In view of the imminent effective date of and nonpriority mail by aircraft, the same fare as passengers terminating at United’s filing, and to provide an ade­ San Francisco. However, United would facilities used and useful therefor, and quate period of time in which to evaluate the services connected therewith as spec­ now have passengers to Reno pay about the many arguments advanced for and $18 more than the San Francisco fare ified above; against the various proposals before it, 2. Further procedures herein shall be for coach service, despite the fact that the Board will suspend that filing.* In Reno is 192 m iles distant from San in accordance with 14 CFR Part 302 and accordance with the recent action of the notice of any objection to the rates or Francisco as compared to 330 miles in Board regarding a similar filing of an­ the case of Medford. to the other findings and conclusions other carrier,8 the proposal to cancel proposed herein shall be filed within 10 Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal night coach fares, which would result in Aviation Act of 1958, and particularly days, and if notice is filed, written answer substantial fare increases, will be sus­ and supporting documents shall be filed sections 204(a), 403, 404, and 1002 pended along with the other proposed thereof, within 30 days after service of this order; fare revisions. With the one exception 3. If no notice of objection is filed It is ordered, That: noted below, this action is taken solely 1. An investigation is instituted to w ithin 10 days after service of this order, as a procedural matter and without prej­ determine whether the fares, charges, or if notice is filed and no answer is udice to United’s proposal. Furthermore, filed within 30 days after service of this and provisions described in Appendix A it does not constitute substantive disposi­ attached hereto, and rules, regulations, order, all persons shall be deemed to tion of the complaint which has been have waived the right to a hearing and or practices affecting such fares, charges, filed against the tariff.4 and provisions, are or will be, unjust or all other procedural steps short of a final The specific exception to which we decision by the Board, and the Board unreasonable, unjustly discriminatory, direct substantive comment relates to unduly preferential, unduly prejudicial, may enter an order incorporating the United’s proposal to cancel certain fares findings and conclusions proposed herein or otherwise unlawful, and if found to be between Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, New unlawful to determine and prescribe the and fix and determine the final and tem­ York, Pittsburgh, and Washington, on law ful fares, charges, and provisions, and porary rates specified herein; the one hand, and Reno, on the other. 4. If answer is filed presenting issues rules, regulations, and practices affecting The fares In question apply on routings such fares, charges, and provisions; for. hearing, the issues involved in deter­ via San Francisco, and are generally $1 mining the fair and reasonable final and higher than the direct fares to Reno 2. Pending hearing and decision by the temporary rates shall be limited to those when no stopover is made, and $5 higher Board, the fares, charges, and p ro v isio n s specifically raised by the answer, except when a stopover is made in San Fran- described in Appendix A 6 hereto are insofar as other issues are raised in ac­ suspended and their use deferred to and cordance with Rule 307 of the rules of including December 13, 1969, Unless practice (14 CFR 302.307); 1 Airline Tariff Publishers, Inc., agent, Tar­ otherwise ordered by the Board, and 5. Travel-Air Aviation, Inc., is hereby iffs CAB Nos. 90, 98, and 101, issued Aug. 1, th at no changes be made therein during 1969. order made a party in Docket 18381; and 3 The remaining tariffs now on file axe the period of suspension except by 6. This order shall be served upon marked for effectiveness on or after- Sept. 27, or special permission of the Board; Travel-Air Aviation, Inc., the Postmaster 1969. Accordingly, the Board does not deem 3. Except to the extent granted here­ General, and Allegheny Airlines, Inc. it necessary to take similar action with re­ in, action on the complaint in D ocket spect thereto. 21326 is hereby deferred; This order will be published in the 9 The Board by Order 69-6-124, dated 4. This investigation be assigned for F ederal R egister. June 24, 1969, suspended a proposal of North­ hearing bef ore an examiner of the Board [seal] H arold R. S anderson, east to cancel its night first-class and night at a time and place hereafter to be des­ coach fares. Secretary. * The complaint was filed by the Honorable ignated; and [F.R. Doe. 69-10838; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969i John E. Moss, M.C. (California), and 19 8:47 a m.] other Members of Congress. B Filed as part of the original document.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTICES 14305 5. A copy of this order be filed withmodity rates consist of a minimum The container tariff would result in the aforesaid tariffs and be served on charge per container determined by mul­ lower rates than are proposed for non­ United Air Lanes, Inc., and the Honor­ tiplying the general commodity rate at containerized shipments and would tend able John E. Moss, M.C. (C alifornia), the 3,000-pound weight break minus 1 to promote carrier efficiency. Although which are hereby made parties to this cent per pound times 3,200 pounds, shippers indicate that the lower con­ proceeding. which reflects a density of 7 pounds per tainer rates would be offset by their costs This order will be published in the cubic foot. The charge for any weight of loading and unloading containers, Federal R egister. above 3,200 pounds would be computed they would have the option of using or at rates which have been set at 67 per­ not using them and we do not find a By the Civil Aeronautics Board. cent of the applicable 3,000 pound gen­ basis to preclude the introduction of [seal] H arolb R. Sanderson, eral commodity rate. The latter charges these rates. Secretary. would then be added to the foregoing Most of the increases proposed by minimum charge resulting in the com­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10839; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; United, although apparently accounting 8:47 a.m.] plete charge for the container. for a minor part of the traffic and reve­ The minimum charge for specific nues in the Hawaiian market, would commodity container traffic would be amount to not over 7.5 percent, but not [Docket No. 21387; Order 69-9-29] equal to the minimum change under less than $1 per 100 pounds for specific UNITED AIR LINES, INC. general commodity rates or by multi­ commodity rates. The Board permitted plying the minimum weight in the con­ increases of the foregoing magnitude to Order of Investigation and Suspen­ tainer times the applicable specific com­ be effected by American Airlines, Inc., sion Regarding Air Freight Rates modity rate minus 1 cent per pound, in Order 69-5-114, dated May 23, 1969, whichever is higher. The container rates Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics and subsequently by other carriers. We for larger shipments are based on rates stated that such increases would not Board at its office in Washington, D.C., per pound that result in charges that on the 5th day of September, 1969. have a sharp impact upon shippers and effect reductions below those proposed would provide a reasonable compromise By tariff révisions1 described below, for noncontainerized shipments. between the carriers’ requirements for United Air Lines, Inc. (U n ited ), proposes Complaints requesting suspension and additional revenues and the shippers’ to revise its air freight rates between investigation of United's proposal have interest that sharp rate increases not be Hawaii and numerous points in the con­ been received from the State of Hawaii, imposed upon them at one step. United’s tinental United States as follows: Sears, Roebuck and Co., and the Papaya reports to the Board indicate all-cargo (1) General Commodity Rates: By Shippers of Hawaii, Inc. The complaints losses in the Hawaiian-U.S. market filing bearing a posting date of August 1, assert, inter alia, that United has not since 1965, with the operating loss for 1969, and marked to become effective provided adequate cost justification for 1968 amounting to about $500,000. September 14, 1969, United proposes to its proposed increased rates, that such However, upon consideration of all cancel in all markets its general com­ rates would be inflationary and have a relevant matters, the Board finds that modity rates (which are in some substantial impact upon the shipping the proposals indicated below may be instances higher westbound than east- public and the economy of Hawaii, and unjust, unreasonable, or unjustly dis­ bound) for weight breaks above 3,000 that the rate reductions proposed for criminatory, or unduly preferential, or pounds. The carrier further proposes to containers are more than offset by the unduly prejudicial, or otherwise unlaw­ increase, by 1 cent per pound, rates at increased costs of loading and unloading ful, and should be investigated. The fore­ the 3,000-pound weight break in a num­ such containers by shippers.2 going proposals are ( 1) the increased ber of markets. The filings would result In support of its proposals and in rates on fresh fruits and vegetables from either in no increases or in increases answer to the complaints, United asserts, Hilo and Honolulu to Los Angeles and typically of 2.5 to 7.7 percent. Prom Los inter aha, that ( 1) its all-cargo services San Francisco for shipments of 10,000 Angeles to Honolulu, however, the cur­ in the Hawaii-U.S. market have been pounds and over, and (2) the cancella­ rent weight breaks of 20,000, 30,000, and conducted for several years at an operat­ tion of the 30,000- and 40,000-pound 40.000 pounds would be canceled, re­ ing Joss chiefly because of low rates for weight breaks for general commodity sulting in rate increases ranging up to large shipments of general commodities 46 percent. rates from Los Angeles to Honolulu. and of fresh fruits and vegetable®, (2) The higher rates proposed on fruits (2) Specific Commodity Rates: By the low rates on papayas have existed and vegetables would affect chiefly large tariffs bearing th e filing or posting date only for 4 years, (3) the rate increases movements of papayas. The increases „ .y 31, 1969, and marked to become proposed on papayas would not have a proposed for shipments of 10,000-14,999 effective September 14, 1969, United detrimental effect upon the volume of air pounds would be from $7 to $9 per 100 proposes to increase by 7.5 percent but shipments, and (4) unless the proposed pounds, by 29 percent, and the increases not less than $1 per 100 pounds numerous rates are permitted to become effective, for shipments of 15,000 pounds and over ¡specific.commodity rates between Hawaii United will be required to assess the from $6 to $9 per 100 pounds, or by 50 and points in the continental United economic justification for providing percent.* The foregoing increases might 28**. such rates are published both cargo service in the market. well have significant impact upon ship­ ^stbound and westbound, but the com- Upon consideration of all relevant pers and thus upon the economic life modities covered in one direction are matters, the Board finds the complaints of Hawaii, and we shall suspend such inP+ually different from those included against United's proposed container increases pending investigation. How­ the other direction. For fresh fruits tariff and against its proposed general ever, the Board would be willing to con­ w .vegetables from Hilo/Honolulu to and specific commodity rates, with the sider the filing of an increase of $1 per os Angdes and San Francisco/Oakland, exceptions noted below, do not set forth 100 pounds in the foregoing rates, which nr toVer’ ra^es would be increased by $2 facts sufficient to warrant investigation, is within approved parameters. of in nnn kuudred pounds for shipments and consequently the request therefor, as 0110.000 pounds and over. The proposed cancellation of higher well as the request for suspension, will be weight breaks for general commodities h^L?°n!aJner Rates: By a tariff denied. ? filing date of August 15, 1969, from Los Angeles to Honolulu would re­ bnr become effective Septem- 2 Tire Board wiU consider the complaints sult in increasing rates for shipments of lish d-I’ 196,9, United Proposes to estab- against the container Tariff CAB 301, rejected 30,000-39,999 pounds from 15 to 19 cents tflinfenera*and specific commodity con- for technical reasons, to apply to United's refiled Tariff CAB 302 containing identical in r!Lrate.s between Hawaii and points rates. 3 The proposed container tariff would make _ aiuornia. The proposed general com- available#-a rate of $8 per 100 pounds for Other communications, not meeting the fruits and vegetables of at least 5,200 pounds Board’s procedural requirements set forth in per container. A shipper association, how­ IucReJiSio5 s Ainiue Tariff Publishers, its rules of practice in economic proceedings ever, claims that the use of containers would Lines ^ nt’ Tariff CAB 115 and United Air (14 OPR 302.500 et seq.) have been filed in s' Inc- Tariff CAB 164 and 302. force it to incur additional handling costs the correspondence section of the docket. more than offsetting the container discount.

No. 174- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14306 NOTICES per pound, or 26.7 percent» and for ship­ This order will be published in the commercial television broadcast station ments of 40,000 pounds and over from F ederal Register. to operate on Channel 41, Battle Creek, Mich., must be substantially complete 13 to 19 cents or, 46 .2 percent* H ie fore­ By the Civil Aeronautics Board. going: increases are relatively large and and tendered tor filing no later than the might also have a considerable effect EseaeI H arold R. Sanderson, close of business November 6, 1969. upon shippers and these rate propos­ Secretary. Action by the Commission Septem­ als will also be suspended pending [F.R. Doc. 69-10840; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; ber 4,1969. Commissioners Hyde CChair- investigation. 8:48 a.m.] mfl.nl, Bartley, W adsworth and H. Rex The Board, however, believes that the Lee, with Commissioner Robert E. Lee current rates, which would continue as not participating, and Commissioner a result of the suspension of the proposed {Docket No. 17727] Cox concurring in the result. increases, may be unduly low: The cur­ W.A.A.C. (NIGERIA) LIMITED F ederal Communications rent yields range between 10.2 and 11.7 Commission, casts per ton-mile, which are low for Notice of Hearing [seal! B en F. WAple, shipments in the predominant traffic Notice is. hereby given pursuant to the Secretary. flow. Consequently, we would consider Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, [F.R. Doc. 69-10820; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; increases raising the rate of 15 cents per 8:46 a.m.] pound at the 30,000-pound weight break that a hearing in tire above-entitled to a maximum of If cents, and the 13- proceeding is assigned to be held on September 25, 1969, at Iff a.m., e.d.s.t., [FCC 69-951] cent rate at the 40,000-pound weight in Room 726, Universal Building, Con­ break to not over 16 cents. The yields CANADA-U.S.A. TELEVISION AGREE­ from the foregoing rates would be 13.3 necticut and Florida Avenues NW., cents and 12.5 cents per ton-mile, re­ Washington, D.C., before the undersigned MENT MODIFIED spectively, which would still be relatively exam iner. Reallocation and Designation of low fear the movements involved but Dated at Washington, D.C. Septem­ Canadian UHF Channel Assign­ would bring revenues into a better rela­ ber 5, 1969. tionship with costs erf service. ments [ sealI Joseph L. F itzmaurice. September 8, 1969. Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal Hearing Examiner. Aviation Act o f 1958» and particularly T he Canada-U.S.A. Television Agree­ sections 204(a) and 1002 thereof, [F.R. Doc; 69-10841; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; ment of 1952 has been modified in the 8:48 a.m.1 f

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTICES 14307

Alberta British Columbia—C ontinued Newfoundland—Continued Channels Athabasca------51. Channels Channels Banff------Sii. R evelstoke______Buchans ______26. Barrhead------21. Rossland —___ 19. Burgeo______34. Blairmore-Coleman____ 57. Salmon Arm _____ 56. Carbonear______79. Bonnyville______78. Smith era . 2ft Clarenville_.______63. Brooks______66, 72. Squamish - _ as. Corner Brook______14, 20, 42. Summerland ------49. Deer Lake___ §!______71. Calgary ------16,22,38,44,50, Terrace 73, 79. Gander ______72. Camrose______20. Trail ...... _____ 36,52. Goose Bay______„ ___ 14, 20. Cardston______19. Vancouver ____- 26, 32, 45, 55, Grand Bank __ ;„.J_____ 49. Claresholm ______52. 72,83. Grand Falls______35, 70. Cold Lake__ ;__ _‘___ __65. Vanderhoof ...... 18. Labrador City______14, 20. Drayton Valley______66. V ernon______18,27. Lewisporte______41. Drumheller______;_30. Victoria______------42, 53, 74, 80. M arystown______27. Edmonton______17, 23, 46, 52, 58, Warfield ...... 25. Port aux Basques______27. 74, 80. Williams Lake ... _...... 21. St. Albans______57. Edson ______73. Manitoba St. Anthony______*___ _ 14, 20. Fairview______14. St. Georges___ __ i__ __79. Port MacLeods______74. A ltona______79. St. John’s______14, 20, 42, 71, 77. Fort McMurray______16, 80. Beausejour______65. St. Lawrence___ u— 78. Fort Saskatchewan_____ ! 29. Boissevain ______47. Springdale______;__ 23. Grarde Prairie..______51, 80. Brandon______------19,25,78. Stephenville ______50. Hanna ______. . 78. Carberry ______70. Wabana______26. Carman ______61. High Prairie______81. North West Territories High River______56. Churchill ______14,20. Hinton ______22. D auphin_____ ._____ 32,50. Yellowknife______14. Fisher Branch___ ...... 34. Innisfail ______71. Nova Scotia Jasper______. 58. Flin Flon ______17,23. Lacombe______15. Gimli — ______Amherst ______47, 797 Leduc ______64. Killamey ______41. Annapolis Royal______42. Lethbridge______23,58,64,80. Lac du Bonnet______75. Antigonish ______23. Medicine Hat______49, 65, 71. Lynn Lake _____'_ 14. Bridgetown___ ;______29. Olds______81. Melita ______76. Bridgewater______54. Peace River______73. Minnedosa ______49. Canso______28. Pinch«: Creek______70. Morden-Winkler _____ 39. C heticam p______72. Ponoka______36. Neepawa______27. D igby------52. Provost______24. Portage la Prairie._____ 18,58. Glace Bay______14, 26, 64. Raymond______36. Roblin SS. Halifax-Dartmouth_____ 22, 32, 38, 44, 63, Red Deer------r 31, 59, 65. R u ssel______...... 63. 74. Rocky MountainJHouse__37. S elk irk ______54. Kentville______76. St. Paul______73. Snow Lake______15. Liverpool______62. Slave Lake___ ,______15. Steinback______17. Louisburg______58. Stettler______57 Swan River ...... 77. Lunenburg______41. Tabor______” ” 49] The Pas______... 18. Middleton______60. Valley view______29. T hom pson______16. Mulgrave______78. Vegreville______70. Virden ______17. New Glasgow______15, 43, 65. Vermilion______79 Winnipeg _ _ 20, 26, 36, New Waterford______76. Vulcan ______” ” 25 71, 77, 83. North Sydney______36. Wainwright__IIIZIIIZI 45, 56. New Brunswick Parrsboro______T___ 20. Wéstlock ______27. Pictou______25. Wetaskiwin______42. Bathurst______------54,82. Sheet Harbour—______35. Whitecourt______44, 50. Buctouche ...... 27. Shelburne______75. Campbellton ------38,78. Springhill______26. British Columbia Caraquet______64. Sydney------20,42,70. Chipman ______67. Sydney Mines______54. Campbell River______49. Chatham ______;____ 62. Castlegar______81. Tatamagouche______49, 77. D alhousie__ ,______60. Truro______55, 71. Chilliwack______14’ 36. D orchester______18. Windsor______16. Courtenay______79’. Edmunston______18, 68. Wolfville______50. Cranbrook_____ J” ” ” 65. Fredericton______15, 45, 61. Yarmouth______40. Creston______42. Grand Falls______> 20. Dawson Creek___ 15 21 M cAdam______;___ __ 71, 77. Ontario Duncan...... 51| M illtown______33. Enderby —------72,78. Arnprior______20. Ferole M oncton______24, 30, 70, 83. Atikokan.______39. 2 1 . N ew castle______35. Barrie______:_____ 55, 74, 83. Nelson______14, 20. Oromocto ______21, 51. Belleville__ „.______15. 2” * St> ...... 17! 23. yolden_____ P e r th ______■_ 37. Blind River______40. R ichibucto______40. Grand Forks—I ” 57' Brantford____.______63. Hope Sackville______53. Brockville______27, 75. 65. St. Andrews______82. Chapleau______._. 33. Kamloops...... 50, 74, 80. St. John------17, 23, 39, 69, 78. Chatham______48. S i0™ * ------21,43. St. Leonard______50. Kimberley______rn Cobourg-Port Hope_____ 67, 80. 71. St. Quentin— 2______42. Collingwood______78. Kinnaird 63. St. Stephens______- __ 49. Kitimat .I I I ” ” Cornwall______36, 77, 83. 21. Salisbury______14. Deep River______25. ^ysm ith 29. Shediac ______36. Merritt___ I Dryden______20. 20. Shippegan______46. fission City” ” ” ” " ” si’ Elliot Lake______18. S u ssex ______:_____48. Española______77. Nanaimo ------_ no 23,63. co Nelson Tracadie ______52. Fort Frances______25. 14,23. W oodstock______55. Fort William- Port Arthur 20, 26, 32, 38, 44. Oliver 41. Fenticb Newfoundland Gananoque______19. 011------73, 79. Goderich______34. 27, 71. Argentia-Placentia__ — 55. Guelph______16. 15,43. Baie V e r te .______— 27. Hamilton______41, 47,53. j^hce Gee 14, 20, 26. frthce Ruj Bay Roberts______— 16. Kapuskasing______77, 83. 14, 20. Bishops Falls______— 64. prtnceton Kenora______21,32. 71. Cona vista — 34. Kingston------2____ 32, 38, 73. 43. Botwood ...... — 19. Kitchener-Waterloo_____ 76, 82.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 14308 NOTICES

Ontario—Continued Quebec—Continued water per day from Shoal Lake—Lake of Channels Channels th e Woods. Leamington -— 80. St. Jean-Iberville---.- 70. When Metro Winnipeg informs the London______40, 52,71. St. Jerome..___ £_— — 78. Commission th at it is prepared to pro­ Midland——— , 58. Senneterre ------19. ceed with the Application, the time and Niagara Falls__ 81. Sept-Isles __——;———. 14,20. place of the hearing will be fixed by the North Bay.__— 48, 70, 76. Shaw inigan____ _——— 16,43, 63. Commission and the public will be so Oakville—____ 73. Sherbrooke______— _ 14,30,50. 24, 46. g Sorel-Tracy______25. ( — ■ notified. Orillia______W. A. B ullard, Oshawa-______22, 77. Thetford Mines______32,74, 80. Ottawa______14, 24, 30, 40, 46, Trois Pistoles------— 73. Secretary, United States Sec­ 52, 58. Trois Rivieres______37,69. tion International Joint Com­ Owen Sound— . 26, 32. Val d’Or-Malartic— — _ 77,83. mission. Parry Sound.__ 62. Valleyfield — ------26,66. D. G. Chance, Pembroke____ _ 41,47,53. Victoriaville ___ _— 71. Secretary, Canadian Section Peterborough— 33, 44,54. Saskatchewan International Joint Commis­ Picton—:______56. Assiniboia —,------_____ 61. sion. Prescott__i — 48; Biggar ------___ — 41. Preston______28. Broadview ------_____ 62. S eptember 9, 1969. Renfrew------69. Oanora ______— — 64. [FR. Doc. 69-10889; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; St. Catharines_ 69. Creighton —— __ _ 83. 8:48 am.] St. Thomas____ 65. Esterhazy__ —. ____ 83. Sarnia.______74, 83. E stevan_____ — — — 40. Sault Ste. Marie. 20, 26, 48, 54, 83. fiston 4 -----¡¿à— ____- 32. Smith Falls____ 71,81. Fort Qu’Appelle— _____ 41. Stratford_____ .. 36. Gravelbourg------_____ 39. SECURITIES AND EXCHAN6E Sturgeon Falls.. 82. Hudson Bay------_____ 70. Sudbury______19, 25, 41, 47, 69. Hum bolt______— — 25. COMMISSION Thessalon____ 70. Indian Head------_____ 75. Timmins ____ 62, 68, 78. Kamsack------_____ 42. COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORPORA­ 19, 25, 45, 51, 57, Toronto _____ Kindersley ------_____ 38. TION OF NEW JERSEY 79. Lloydminster---- _____ 16. Trenton ____ 35. Maple Creek------______53. Order Suspending Trading Welland ______v ______75. Meadow Lake------...... ' 64. Windsor ______26, 32,78. Melfort------______48. S eptember 5,1969. W ingham ______72. Melville — ------_____ 46. Woodstock ______18. It appearing to the Securities and Ex­ Moose Jaw______...... 16,26.55. change Commission th at the summary P rince Edward I sland Moosomin ------...... 54. N ip aw in ------_____ 32. suspension of trading in the common Charlottetown ______31,37, 81. North Battleford...... 39,71. stock and all other securities of Com­ Summerslde ___ _-— 57,75. Oxbow ------— — 56. mercial Finance Corporation of New Jer­ S o u r is------21. Prince Albert---- ______18,24,77. sey, a New Jersey corporation, being Q u e b e c Regina ------___ __ 18, 24, 47, 53, 71, traded otherwise than on a national 77. Alma ------48, 74, 80. securities exchange is required in the R osetow n------...... 63. public interest and for the protection of A m os______22. Rosthern ------______46. A sbestos______53. Saskatoon ------______17,23,33,54,70, investors; Baie Comeau- 76. It is ordered, Pursuant to section 15 H auterive______28, 57, 79. Shaunavon------______78. (c) (5) of the Securities Exchange Act of Bale St. Paul______75. Shellbrook------...... 40. 1934, that trading in such securities Buckingham ______8 0 . Swift Current-______40,56. otherwise than on a national securities Cabano ______63. ______69. Chicoutimi-Arvida ____ 36, 58, 70, 76, 82. Tisdale ------exchange be summarily suspended, this Unity ------___ 80. order to be effective for the period Sep­ Clermont-La Malbaie—. 23. Wa tr o u s ______78. Cowansville_____ .------79. Weybum ------____ 48. tem ber 8, 1969 through September 17, Coaticook ______75. ______31. 1969, both dates inclusive. 78. W ilk ie______Dolbeau ______Wynyard______31. Donnacona ______24. ______20,33. By the Commission. Drummondville _____ — 19, 41. Yorkton ______[SEAL] ORVAL L. D uBOIS, E steourt------43. Yukon Secretary. Forestville ______77. D a w so n ______14, 20. Granby ------73. Whitehorse ______14, 20. [F.R. Doc. 69-10813; Filed, Sept. 10, 19®; Hes-de-la Madeleine___ 16, 22. 8:45 a.m.] Jonquiere-Kenogami — 14, 20, 30, 42. [F.R. Doc. 69-10821; Filed, Sept. 10, 1969; J o ilie t______65. 8:46 a.m.] Lac Megantic------42. La Sarre------33. FEDERAL OIL CO. La Tuque------34, 66. Order Suspending Trading M agog------81. M atane______24, 49. INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMIS­ S eptember 5, 1969. Mont Joli------22. It appearing to the Securities and Ex­ Mont Laurier------68. SION-UNITED STATES AND M ontmagny------49, 67. change Commission th at the summary Montreal______17, 23, 29, 35, 60, suspension of trading in the comm 76, 82. CANADA stock and all other securities of Federal New Carlisle------17. Oil Co., a Nevada corporation, berne P erce------15. METROPOLITAN CORPORATION OF traded otherwise than on a national se­ Plessisville —------61. GREATER WINNIPEG curities exchange is required in the Pu Port Alfred-Bagotville__ 52, 64. Quebec-Levis______15, 21, 27, 45, 51, Postponement of Public Hearing lie interest and for the protection 77,83. investors; ' . Rimouski ------16, 51. The International Joint Commission, It is ordered, Pursuant to section 1o'(c Riviere-du-Loup------35, 71. at the request of the Applicant, The (5) of the Securities Exchange Act Roberval------26. Metropolitan Corporation of Greater 1934, that trading in such secu^!Ls Rouyn-Nonanda______14,20,61. Winnipeg, has postponed until further othervttse than on a national secun _ Ste. Agathe-des-Monts— 56. notice the public hearing scheduled for Ste. Anne-de-la exchange be summarily suspended, w"® September 17 at Kenora, Ontario in the order to be effective for the period Sep Pocatiere______65. matter of the Application of the above- St. Felicien.______72. tember 7, 1969 through September St. Georges de Beauce—— 72. named for approval of the diversion of St. Hyacinthe______47. an additional 200 million gallons of 1969, both dates inclusive.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1969 NOTICES 14309 By the Commission. of 1934, that trading in such securities suspension of trading in the common [SEAL] ORVAL L. D uBOIS, otherwise than on a national securities stock of Pacific Fidelity Corp., a Nevada Secretary. exchange be summarily suspended, corporation, and all other securities of [F.R. Doc. 69-10814; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; this order to be effective for the period Pacific Fidelity Corp., being traded 8:46 ajxi.] otherwise than on a national securities September 6,1969 through September 15, exchange is required in the public inter­ LIBERTY EQUITIES CORP. 1969, both dates inclusive. est and for the protection of investors; By the Commission. It is ordered, Pursuant to section 15 Order Suspending Trading (c) (5) of the Securities Exchange Act S eptember 5, 1969. [seal] Orval L. D uB ois, of 1934, that trading in such securities It appearing to the Securities and Ex­ Secretary. otherwise than on a national securities change Commission that the summary [F.R. Doc. 69-10815; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; exchange be summarily suspended, this suspension of trading in the common 8:46 a.m.] order to be effective for the period stock and all other securities of Liberty September 7, 1969 through Septem­ Equities Corp., a D istrict of Columbia corporation, being traded otherwise than PACIFIC FIDELITY CORP. ber 16,1969, both dates inclusive. on a national securities exchange is re­ Order Suspending Trading By the Commission. quired in the public interest and for [seal] Orval L. D uB ois, the protection of investors; S eptember 5, 1969. Secretary. ' It is ordered, Pursuant to section 15 It appearing to the Securities and Ex­ (c)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act [F.R. Doc. 69-10816; Piled, Sept. 10, 1969; change Commission that the summary 8:46 a.m.J

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 174— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, ] 969 14310 FEDERAL REGISTER CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— SEPTEMBER

The following numerical guide is a list of parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during September

3 2 A CFR Pil8“ 3 CFR page 1 4 CFR— C o n tin u e d Page 127 ______14069 OIA (Ch. X ) : Executive Orders: OI Reg. 1______14283 10994 (superseded by 11480)— 14273 11018 (superseded by 11480)— 14273 3 3 CFR 11479 ______14271 P roposed Rules: 4n ______... __ a_____ 14211 11480 ______14273 19 ______14079 11481 ______14277 39 ______14226, 14227 3 6 CFR Proclamations : 47 ______14079 01 __ 14081 9 . — - - __ 14170 5 _14212 3927______14269 71 13999. 14082,14176,14285,14286 7 ... _ 14212 5 CFR 70 .... 14002. 14227 P roposed Rules: 213 13968.14066.14201 91 ______14079 7 ...... 13994, 14035 •7i q __ 14023 167______14129 288______14078 3 7 CFR 7 CFR 399______14078 S1 ______13991 P roposed R ules: i —___ 14176 1 6 CFR 15 ...... 13988 722 ______14065 3 9 CFR 729 ______14121,14201 Proposed Rules: RRR ______14201 245______14176 123 ______14170 908 ______14025, 14279 910 ______— 14122 1 7 CFR 132 ___ H______— 14171 926 ______14206 iod------14Q28 948 ______14065 981 ______14279 987______14280 249______14209 993______14206 Proposed R ules: „„o __ 14028 1421______14206 210______14227 1475______14206 230______14228 4 1 CFR P roposed Rules: 239 ______14234 12-1______14^13 2 9 ______- ____ 14035 240 14235 906______14129 249 _____ 14238, 14240 12 3 ______14221 oot 14224 iL ?::::::::::: ______932______14225 21 CFR 944 -13994 1 ______14070 4 3 CFR P4R 14035.14225 3 ______14167 1007______13994 19 . ■ 14070 1090______•----- 13994 20 ______14071 Public Land Orders: 1126______14226 19(1 14073. 14126. 14168 4582 (modified by PLO 4682) — 14076 121 ... 14168.14169 8 CFR 131______14167 103...... 14123 191______14169 4 7 CFR 9 CFR P roposed Rules: 99U ------13989,------i399Q 14222 17 o 14(124 22 ______13999 74 14024.14066 1 4 8 m ------14078 P roposed Rules: 3 1 7 ______13992 191______14129 ,7«, . _____ 14000 Proposed R ules: 112 ______14224 2 4 CFR 4 9 CFR 113 ______14224 1600...... - 14027 ,noo ¡1 I MM__ 14172 114 ...... — ...... 14224 1033...... 4 2 6 CFR 1048...... 1 1 0 CFR P roposed Rules: P roposed R ules: 40 _ 14067 -nr ' ____ 14054 151______14224 Ch IV ------1 2 CFR 265______14279 3 1 CFR 1307...... 1 251______14126 1 4 CFR 253 ______14126 21 _ ____ \______14067 254 ______14126 5 0 CFR 39 ______13968, 256 ______14126 m _ . 14028, 14223 13969, 14025-14027, 14123, 14207, 290______14126 ...... — ------“ ------13991. 14208, 14280 14032-14034, 14074, 14075, 14174, 71 14027r 32 CFR 14068, 14069, 14124, 14208, 14209, 14283, 14284 intli 163...... 14027 14280, 14281 oo ...... 14074 5 0 1 - . . ______14126 73______— 14069, 14124 Proposed R ules: 75 14209 806______14209 , , ...... 14079 97______13970 809______1421C