DOCSLIB.ORG

Advisory Circular AC66-1 Aircraft Maintenance Engineer Licence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advisory Circular AC66-1 Aircraft Maintenance Engineer Licence Advisory Circular AC66-1 Revision 1 01 May 2016 Aircraft Maintenance Engineer Licence— General General Civil Aviation Authority advisory circulars contain information about standards, practices, and procedures that the Director has found to be an acceptable means of compliance with the associated rule. An acceptable means of compliance is not intended to be the only means of compliance with a rule, and consideration will be given to other methods of compliance that may be presented to the Director. When new standards, practices, or procedures are found to be acceptable they will be added to the appropriate advisory circular. An advisory circular also includes guidance material to facilitate compliance with the rule requirements. Guidance material must not be regarded as an acceptable means of compliance. Purpose The advisory circular provides acceptable means of compliance for issue of aircraft maintenance licences, certificates and ratings and the privileges and limitations of those licences, certificates and ratings. Related Rules This advisory circular relates specifically to Civil Aviation Rule Part 66. Change Notice No change. Advisory Circular AC66-1 Revision 1 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4 General ..................................................................................................................... 4 66.1 Purpose.................................................................................................................... 4 66.55 Application for licences, certificates, and ratings................................................... 4 66.7 Issue of licences, certificates and ratings ................................................................. 5 66.7(1) - Fit and proper person test .......................................................................... 5 66.7(2) - English language test ................................................................................. 5 66.7(3) - Eligibility requirements ............................................................................... 5 66.7(4) - Interest of aviation safety ........................................................................... 5 66.8 - Foreign AME Licence recognition ................................................................... 5 66.61 Duration of licences and certificates ...................................................................... 6 66.9 Examinations ........................................................................................................... 6 Subpart B - Aircraft Maintenance Engineer Licence ........................................... 8 66.57 Eligibility requirements .......................................................................................... 8 66.57(a)(2) - Examinations....................................................................................... 8 66.57(b) - Practical experience, training ................................................................... 9 66.59 Privileges and limitations ............................................................................ 10 Part 145 Demarcation ............................................................................................ 11 66.59(b) - Familiarity .............................................................................................. 11 66.59(c) - Special Test Equipment ......................................................................... 11 66.107 Eligibility requirements ........................................................................................ 12 66.107(2) - Practical experience ............................................................................ 12 66.107(3) - Examinations and courses .................................................................. 14 Subpart D - Aircraft Maintenance Specialist Certificate.................................... 17 66.157 Eligibility requirements ........................................................................................ 17 AMS-1 , AMS-2, AMS-3, AMS-4................................................................................ 17 Specific Maintenance Tasks .................................................................................. 17 Practical Experience for LAME applying for an AMS-4...................................................... 17 Subpart E - Certificate of Inspection Authorisation - (IA) ................................. 19 66.205 Eligibility requirements ........................................................................................ 19 66.207 Privileges and limitations ..................................................................................... 19 66.211 Recent experience requirements ........................................................................ 19 APPENDIX 1 - Categories and Ratings described ............................................. 20 APPENDIX 2 - AMEL Ratings ............................................................................... 21 Category Aeroplane Rating Groups 1 to 6 .............................................................. 21 Rating Group 1 ..................................................................................................... 21 Rating Group 2 ..................................................................................................... 21 Rating Group 3 ..................................................................................................... 22 Rating Group 4 ..................................................................................................... 22 Rating Group 5 - Type ratings ............................................................................. 22 Rating Group 6 - Type ratings ............................................................................. 23 Category Rotorcraft Rating Groups 1 to 3 .............................................................. 24 Rating Group 1 ..................................................................................................... 24 Rating Group 2 ..................................................................................................... 24 Rating Group 3 – Specific Type ratings ............................................................. 24 Category Power plant Rating Groups 1 to 3 ........................................................... 25 Rating Group 1 ..................................................................................................... 25 Rating Group 2 ..................................................................................................... 25 Rating Group 3 – Specific Type ratings ............................................................. 25 01 May 2016 2 CASA PNG Advisory Circular AC66-1 Revision 1 Category Electrical Ratings 1 to 2 ........................................................................... 27 Rating Group 1 ..................................................................................................... 27 Rating Group 2 – Specific Type Ratings ............................................................ 27 Category Instrument Ratings 1 to 3 ......................................................................... 27 Rating Group 1 ..................................................................................................... 27 Rating Group 2 ..................................................................................................... 27 Rating Group 3 – Specific Type Ratings ............................................................ 27 Category Radio Ratings 1 to 4 ................................................................................ 27 Rating Group 1 ..................................................................................................... 27 Rating Group 2 ..................................................................................................... 27 Rating Group 3 ..................................................................................................... 27 Rating Group 4 – Specific Type Ratings ............................................................ 27 Category Lighter Than Air Aircraft ....................................................................... 28 Rating Group 1 ..................................................................................................... 28 Rating Group 2 ..................................................................................................... 28 Rating Group 7 – Components .................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX 3 - Category Demarcations ............................................................... 29 APPENDIX 4 - List of typical maintenance tasks ............................................... 32 APPENDIX 5 - Acceptable PTR format ................................................................ 35 Documenting practical experience ..................................................................... 35 APPENDIX 6 - AME Licence Examination Syllabus Structure ......................... 36 Performance verbs .............................................................................................. 36 Topic Numbering ................................................................................................. 37 Objective description .......................................................................................... 37 Knowledge levels ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Decision 2005/07/R
    DECISION No 2005/07/R OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AGENCY of 19-12-2005 amending Decision No 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation (hereinafter referred to as the Basic Regulation) and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency1 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agency”), and in particular Articles 13 and 14 thereof. Having regard to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 28 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks.2 Whereas: (1) Annex IV Acceptable Means of Compliance to Part- 66 Appendix 1 Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence (hereinafter referred to as Part-66 AMC Appendix I) is required to be up to date to serve as reference for the national aviation authorities. (2) To achieve this requirement the text of Part-66 AMC Appendix I should be amended regularly to add new aircraft type rating. (3) The regular amendment of Part-66 AMC Appendix I is considered as a permanent rulemaking task for the Agency. This decision represents the first update according to an accelerated procedure accepted by AGNA and SSCC.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Helicopter Turboshaft Engines
    Comparison of Helicopter Turboshaft Engines John Schenderlein1, and Tyler Clayton2 University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80304 Although they garnish less attention than their flashy jet cousins, turboshaft engines hold a specialized niche in the aviation industry. Built to be compact, efficient, and powerful, turboshafts have made modern helicopters and the feats they accomplish possible. First implemented in the 1950s, turboshaft geometry has gone largely unchanged, but advances in materials and axial flow technology have continued to drive higher power and efficiency from today's turboshafts. Similarly to the turbojet and fan industry, there are only a handful of big players in the market. The usual suspects - Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, and Rolls-Royce - have taken over most of the industry, but lesser known companies like Lycoming and Turbomeca still hold a footing in the Turboshaft world. Nomenclature shp = Shaft Horsepower SFC = Specific Fuel Consumption FPT = Free Power Turbine HPT = High Power Turbine Introduction & Background Turboshaft engines are very similar to a turboprop engine; in fact many turboshaft engines were created by modifying existing turboprop engines to fit the needs of the rotorcraft they propel. The most common use of turboshaft engines is in scenarios where high power and reliability are required within a small envelope of requirements for size and weight. Most helicopter, marine, and auxiliary power units applications take advantage of turboshaft configurations. In fact, the turboshaft plays a workhorse role in the aviation industry as much as it is does for industrial power generation. While conventional turbine jet propulsion is achieved through thrust generated by a hot and fast exhaust stream, turboshaft engines creates shaft power that drives one or more rotors on the vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelado Del Turborreactor General Electric J85-13 Mediante Catia V5 Ingeniería Aeronáutica
    PROYECTO FIN DE CARRERA MODELADO DEL TURBORREACTOR GENERAL ELECTRIC J85-13 MEDIANTE CATIA V5 INGENIERÍA AERONÁUTICA Página | 1 FÉLIX RENTERO DE LLANO HOJA INTENCIONALMENTE DEJADA EN BLANCO Página | 2 Félix Rentero de Llano MODELADO DEL TURBORREACTOR GENERAL ELECTRIC J85-13 MEDIANTE CATIA V5 MODELADO DEL TURBORREACTOR GENERAL ELECTRIC J85-13 MEDIANTE CATIA V5 PROYECTO FIN DE CARRERA Autor Félix Rentero de Llano Tutores Juan Martínez Palacios María Gloria del Río Cidoncha Departamento de Ingeniería Gráfica Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Universidad de Sevilla Página | 3 Félix Rentero de Llano MODELADO DEL TURBORREACTOR GENERAL ELECTRIC J85-13 MEDIANTE CATIA V5 HOJA INTENCIONALMENTE DEJADA EN BLANCO Página | 4 Félix Rentero de Llano MODELADO DEL TURBORREACTOR GENERAL ELECTRIC J85-13 MEDIANTE CATIA V5 Índice PARTE I. INTRODUCCIÓN 1. OBJETIVO..................................................................................... 12 2. MOTIVACIÓN Y UTILIDAD ............................................................. 12 3.METODOLOGÍA ............................................................................. 12 4.ESTRUCTURA ................................................................................ 13 PARTE II. GENERAL ELECTRIC J85-13 5.HISTORIA Y MODELOS PREVIOS ...................................................... 16 6.GENERAL ELECTRIC J85 ................................................................. 18 6.1 Desarrollo ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2011. ■ 2012 USAF Almanac Bombers B-1 Lancer Brief: A long-range, air refuelable multirole bomber capable of flying intercontinental missions and penetrating enemy defenses with the largest payload of guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory. Function: Long-range conventional bomber. Operator: ACC, AFMC. First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); Oct. 18, 1984 (B-1B). Delivered: June 1985-May 1988. IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Tex. (B-1B). Production: 104. Inventory: 66. Aircraft Location: Dyess AFB, Tex.; Edwards AFB, Calif.; Eglin AFB, Fla.; Ellsworth AFB, S.D. Contractor: Boeing, AIL Systems, General Electric. Power Plant: four General Electric F101-GE-102 turbofans, each 30,780 lb thrust. Accommodation: pilot, copilot, and two WSOs (offensive and defensive), on zero/zero ACES II ejection seats. Dimensions: span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 ft, height 34 ft. B-1B Lancer (SSgt. Brian Ferguson) Weight: max T-O 477,000 lb. Ceiling: more than 30,000 ft. carriage, improved onboard computers, improved B-2 Spirit Performance: speed 900+ mph at S-L, range communications. Sniper targeting pod added in Brief: Stealthy, long-range multirole bomber that intercontinental. mid-2008. Receiving Fully Integrated Data Link can deliver nuclear and conventional munitions Armament: three internal weapons bays capable of (FIDL) upgrade to include Link 16 and Joint Range anywhere on the globe. accommodating a wide range of weapons incl up to Extension data link, enabling permanent LOS and Function: Long-range heavy bomber.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical-Mechanics
    JET OR REACTION PROPULSION Have YOU Joined the Well -paid Ranks of the TRAINED MEN? MANY THOUSANDS MORE ARE URGENTLY NEEDED. PREPARE YOURSELF FOR A MASTERPIECES 10- BETTER POSITION AND BETTER PAY IN MINIATURE! Ambitious men everywhere have succeeded through Long experience and consummate skillin the art of model making has made the name I.C.S. Home Study Courses. So also can you. We Bassett-Lowke famousfordetailperfect offer you the benefit of our 53 years' matchless ex- scale models ofallkinds.To -day we are fully engaged on work for H.M. Government, perience asthe creative pioneers of but as soon as victory is won we shall be " Building a air,. postal instruction.Since our establish- gaugeFlyingScots- ready to resume production of Model Rail- man," fully illustrated ways, Ships and Engines for all our customers. ment in1891, more than1,000,000 with drawings and photographs, priceII - Our London and Manchester branches are British men and women have enrolled post free. still open and our wartime staff will be pleased Wartime stock list to give assistance on any model matters. for I.C.S. Courses. (L/12) price 4d. post free. The man with an I.C.S. Training in any one of the subjects listedbelow knowsitthoroughly,completely,practically. BASSETT-LOW K E9 Ltd. And heknows how to applyitinhis everydaywork. NORTHAMPTON Accountancy Draughtsmanship Motor Engineering LONDON :112, HighHolborn, W.C.I. Advertising Drawing Office Practice Motor Mechanic MANCHESTER :28, Corporation Street. Aeronautical Engineering Electrical Engineering Moulding Aaro Engine Fitting Engineer in Charge Pattern making Aero Fitting and Rigging Eng. Shop Practice Quantity Surveying Aeroplane Designing Fire Engineering Radio Engineering Air -Conditioning Fitting and Turning Radio Servicing S.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Vehicle Options Arising from the Barrel Type Piston Engine
    Journal of Power Technologies 101 (1) (2021) 22–33 Military vehicle options arising from the barrel type piston engine Pawe l Mazuro1 and Cezary Chmielewski1,B 1Warsaw University of Technology B [email protected] Abstract in terms of efficiency, meaning that piston engines can deliver enhanced range and endurance. This is benefi- The article reviews knowledge about requirements for engines in cial in missions requiring a stopover for refueling and state-of-the-art unmanned aerial vehicles and tanks. Analysis of particularly useful for unmanned supply, observation design and operational parameters was carried out on selected and maritime missions. turboshaft and piston engines generating power in the range of 500 - 1500 kW (0.5 - 1.5 MW). The data was compared In contrast, land combat vehicles have significantly with the performance of innovative, barrel type piston engines, different drive unit requirements. High mobility en- which are likely to become an alternative drive solution in the ables the vehicle to rapidly change location after de- target vehicle groups. tection. To this end, the torque curve as a function of the rotational speed of the shaft is of decisive im- portance. Keywords: military UAV, tanks, turboshaft engines, piston engines, barrel type piston engines The complexity of tank engines adds an additional layer of requirements, impacting the reliability and durability of the power unit, and they come with re- 1 Introduction lated manufacturing and operating costs. In military land vehicles, the engine should be as small This article consolidates knowledge on options and as possible; the space saved can be used for other capabilities arising from use of the barrel type piston purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power for Flight: NASA's Contributions To
    The Power Power The forFlight NASA’s Contributions to Aircraft Propulsion for for Flight Jeremy R. Kinney ThePower for NASA’s Contributions to Aircraft Propulsion Flight Jeremy R. Kinney Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Kinney, Jeremy R., author. Title: The power for flight : NASA’s contributions to aircraft propulsion / Jeremy R. Kinney. Description: Washington, DC : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017027182 (print) | LCCN 2017028761 (ebook) | ISBN 9781626830387 (Epub) | ISBN 9781626830370 (hardcover) ) | ISBN 9781626830394 (softcover) Subjects: LCSH: United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration– Research–History. | Airplanes–Jet propulsion–Research–United States– History. | Airplanes–Motors–Research–United States–History. Classification: LCC TL521.312 (ebook) | LCC TL521.312 .K47 2017 (print) | DDC 629.134/35072073–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017027182 Copyright © 2017 by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the United States Government or of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC Table of Contents Dedication v Acknowledgments vi Foreword vii Chapter 1: The NACA and Aircraft Propulsion, 1915–1958.................................1 Chapter 2: NASA Gets to Work, 1958–1975 ..................................................... 49 Chapter 3: The Shift Toward Commercial Aviation, 1966–1975 ...................... 73 Chapter 4: The Quest for Propulsive Efficiency, 1976–1989 ......................... 103 Chapter 5: Propulsion Control Enters the Computer Era, 1976–1998 ........... 139 Chapter 6: Transiting to a New Century, 1990–2008 ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pursuit of Power NASA’S Propulsion Systems Laboratory No
    Pursuit of Power NASA’s Propulsion Systems Laboratory No. 1 and 2 By Robert S. Arrighi National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Program Office Public Outreach Division NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546 SP–2012–4548 2012 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Arrighi, Robert S., 1969- Pursuit of Power : NASA’s Propulsion Systems Laboratory, No. 1 & 2 / Robert S. Arrighi. p. cm. -- (NASA history series) (NASA SP ; 2012-4548) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Propulsion Systems Laboratory (U.S.)--History. 2. Wind tunnels. 3. Hypersonic wind tunnels. 4. Aerodynamics--Research--United States--History--20th century. 5. Propulsion systems--United States--History--20th century. 6. NASA Glenn Research Center. I. United States. NASA History Division. II. Title. III. Title: NASA’s Propulsion Systems Laboratory, No. 1 & 2. IV. Title: Propulsion Systems Laboratory, No. 1 & 2. TL568.P75A77 2012 629.1’1072--dc23 2011032380 • Table of Contents • Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ vii Condensed History of the PSL ......................................................................................................... ix Preserving the PSL Legacy ................................................................................................................. ix Endnotes for Introduction .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lycoming Engine Development, June 1963
    VOLUME 1, NU BER 3 JUNE, 1963 B. H. WARREN NOW VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL MANAGER---------------------------­ The appointment of Beverly H. Warren as vice president and general manager of Lycoming Division has been announced by James R. Kerr, president and cbief operating officer of AVCO Corporation. General Warren has been vice president of AVCO's Defense and Industrial Products Group since April, 1961, and director of its Operational Missiles Subdivision since September, 1960. He is a veteran of more than 25 years service with the U.S. Air Force, and retired in 1960 with the rank of Major General. In other organizational changes, General Warren announced the appointment of Dr. Anselm Franz as vice president and general manager, gas turbines, and of Paul A. Deegan as director of administration. Dr. Franz in turn announced that Dr. Heinrich Adenstedt bas been named to the position of vice president, gas turbines operations. LYCOMING SALES DEPARTMENT ACTIVE-------------------------------------------­ Sales promotion efforts during the Summer will be centered on demonstrations of the Bell 2u4B, commercial version of the Army's Iroquois helicopter, and sales proposals for Lycoming's T55 turboprop and turbofan engines to potential users in Europe, Canada, and the United States. The Bell 204B helicopter is owered by the 1100 shaft horsepower Lycoming T5309 gas turbine engine which differs from the T53-L-9 military engine only in the use of fireproof fuel and oil lines. Two aircraft will make three month demonstration tours, one heading West, the other East. Customers will be invited to demonstrations by the Bell Helicopter egional sales manager in their area, who will be assisted by Bob McCalpin of Lycoming's sales staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Off-Design Performance Prediction of Gas Turbines Without the Use of Compressor Or Turbine Characteristics
    Off-Design Performance Prediction of Gas Turbines without the use of Compressor or Turbine Characteristics by Janitha Kanishka Suraweera A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in Aerospace Engineering Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2011 Janitha Kanishka Suraweera Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87806-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87806-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tm-1-2840-252-23-3
    TM 1-2840-252-23-3 TECHNICAL MANUAL AVIATION UNIT AND AVIATION INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE MANUAL ENGINE, GAS TURBINE MODEL T55-L-714 NSN 2840-01-353-7635 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 1 DECEMBER 1994 TM 1–2840–252–23–3 CHANGE HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NO. 1 WASHINGTON, D.C., 31 January 2003 TECHNICAL MANUAL Aviation Unit and Aviation Intermediate Maintenance Manual ENGINE, GAS TURBINE, MODEL T55–L–714 (NSN 2840–01–353–7635) OZONE DEPLETING CHEMICAL INFORMATION This document has been reviewed for the presence of class I ozone depleting chemicals. As of the basic, dated 1 December 1994, all references to Class I ozone depleting chemicals have been removed from this document by substitution with chemicals by the Engineering, Environment, and Logistics Oversight Office that do not cause atmospheric ozone depletion. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited TM 1–2840–252–23–3, 1 December 1994, is changed as follows: 1. Remove and insert pages as indicated below. New or changed text material is indicated by a vertical bar in the margin. An illustration change is indicated by a miniature pointing hand. Remove pages Insert pages – – A and B i and ii i and ii A–1 and A–2 A–1 and A–2 C–3 and C–4 C–3 and C–4 C–7 and C–8(blank) C–7 and C–8(blank) G–123 and G–124 G–123 and G–124 Index–3 and Index–4 Index–3 and Index–4 2.
    [Show full text]