DOCSLIB.ORG

The Larva of Parasetodes Respersellus (Rambur 1841) with Notes on Its Habitat and European Distribution (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Zootaxa 3841 (4): 563–572 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3841.4.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3B24BB74-8E96-442F-ABDD-A5CDA32287AC The larva of Parasetodes respersellus (Rambur 1841) with notes on its habitat and European distribution (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae) ARNOLD MÓRA1, PÉTER JUHÁSZ2, BÉLA KISS2, ZOLTÁN MÜLLER2 & KRISTÓF MÁLNÁS2 1MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Balaton Limnological Institute, Klebelsberg Kuno 3, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary 2BioAqua Pro Ltd., Soó Rezső utca 21, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary Corresponding author: Arnold Móra, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Two larvae collected from the River Tisza were recognized to belong to the genus Parasetodes according to the available generic description. The fact that Parasetodes respersellus is the only European/Western Palaearctic representative of the genus enabled us to describe the hitherto unknown larva of this species based on the collected specimens. Diagnostic fea- tures to distinguish the genus from other Central European genera are discussed. Possible species-specific characters are compared with those of other previously described species of the genus. Some notes on larval habitat and the European distribution of P. respersellus are given. Key words: long-horned caddisflies, larval description, morphological characters, Hungary Introduction In the family of long-horned caddisflies (Leptoceridae), Parasetodes McLachlan 1880 is a small genus, which was included in Nectopsychini by Morse (1981) and was phylogenetically clustered weakly with Leptocerina Mosely 1932 and Achoropsyche Holzenthal 1984 and possibly with Blyzophilus Andersen et al. 1999 and Nectopsyche Müller 1879 by Malm & Johanson (2011). The genus is distributed in the Afrotropical, Palaearctic and Oriental Regions, represented by seven species and one subspecies (Morse 2014) which Malicky (2006, 2013b) was unable to differentiate. Among these species, Parasetodes respersellus (Rambur 1842) is the only species known from the Western Palaearctic Region (Graf et al. 2008; Malicky 2004, 2013b; Morse 2014). Although the adults of Parasetodes species are well known, our knowledge of the larvae is more limited. A detailed generic description was given on the basis of larvae of P. tumbanus Marlier (Marlier 1962). Additionally, some characters of larvae of P. maguirus Mosely were mentioned and illustrated by de Moor (2002). Both species are distributed in the Afrotropical region (Morse 2014), and no information is yet available for larvae of species from the Palaearctic and Oriental regions. However, the above mentioned descriptions enable us to distinguish the larva of Parasetodes from those of other genera. At the same time, after the recent description of the larva of Homilia leucophaea (Forcellini et al. 2013), Parasetodes respersellus still represents the only Central European leptocerid genus with an unknown larva (Waringer & Graf 2011, 2013). In 2013 two leptocerid larvae were collected along the River Tisza, Hungary, which were not identifiable according to currently used keys for Central European species (Lechthaler & Stockinger 2005; Waringer & Graf 2011, 2013). Notwithstanding, we were able to recognize that the specimens belong to the genus Parasetodes according to the generic description by Marlier (1962). The fact that Parasetodes respersellus is the only European representative of the genus enabled us to describe the hitherto unknown larva of this species based on the collected specimens. Accepted by J. Morse: 9 Jul. 2014; published: 29 Jul. 2014 563 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 References cited Arimoro, F.O., Nwadukwe, F.O. & Mordi, K.O. (2011) The influence of habitat and environmental water quality on the structure and composition of the adult aquatic insect fauna of the Ethiope River, Delta State, Nigeria. Tropical Zoology, 24, 159–171. Bertuetti, E., Lodovici, O. & Valle, M. (2001) The caddisflies of the river Po (Insecta, Trichoptera). La Rivista del Museo Civico di Scienze Naturali “Enrico Caffi” Bergamo, 20, 87–97. [in Italian] Buczyńska, E., Shapoval, A.P. & Buczyński, P. (2014) The northernmost European record of Parasetodes respersellus (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae) from the Courish Spit (Russia) with notes on its distribution and imaginal morphology. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 38, 631–636. http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1401-1 Chakona, A., Phiri, C. & Day, J.A. (2009) Potential for Trichoptera communities as biological indicators of morphological degradation in riverine systems. Hydrobiologia, 621, 155–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9638-z Ciubuc, C. (2004) Trichoptera (Insecta) of the Danube Delta Reserve and Razim-Sinoe lagoon system (Romania). Travaux du Muséum National d’Historie Naturelle “Grigore Antipa”, 47, 211–231. de Moor, F.C. (2002) An assessment of the global distribution of Leptocerinae (Trichoptera) and use of larval characters for determining phylogenetic relationships. Nova Supplementa Entomologica, 15, 293–308. Deák, C. & Portelechi, D.D. (2014) First record of Wormaldia subnigra McLachlan, 1865 (Trichoptera) in Hungary. Acta Biologica Debrecina Supplementum Oecologica Hungarica, 32, 19–22. Forcellini, M., Statzner, B. & Tachet, H. (2013) A revised description of the larva of Homilia leucophaea (Rambur 1842) (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae) and comparisons with the known western European Athripsodes larvae. Zootaxa, 3682 (1), 191–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3682.1.10 Graf, W., Murphy, J., Dahl, J., Zamora-Muñoz, C. & López-Rodríguez, M.J. (2008) Volume 1 – Trichoptera. In: Schmidt- Kloiber, A. & Hering, D. (Eds.), Distribution and ecological preferences of European freshwater organisms. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 388 pp. Hering, D., Buffagni, A., Moog, O., Sandin, L., Sommerhäuser, M., Stubauer, I., Feld, C., Johnson, R., Pinto, P., Skoulikidis, N., Verdonschot, P. & Zahrádková, S. (2003) The development of a system to assess the ecological quality of streams based on macroinvertebrates – design of the sampling programme within the AQEM project. International Review of Hydrobiology, 88, 345–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200390030 Illies, J. (Ed.) (1978) Limnofauna Europaea. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart – New York + Swets & Zeitlinger B.V., Amsterdam, 532 pp. [in German] Laudee, P. & Prommi, T. (2011) Biodiversity and distribution of Trichoptera species along the Tapee River, Surat Thani Province, southern Thailand. Zoosymposia, 5, 279–287. Lechthaler, W. & Stockinger, W. (2005) Trichoptera – Key to larvae from Central Europe. Eutaxa—Taxonomic software, Wien. Malicky, H. (2004) Atlas of European Trichoptera. Second edition. Springer, Dordrecht, 359 pp. Malicky, H. (2005) Die Köcherfliegen Griechenlands. Denisia, 17, 1–240. [in German] Malicky, H. (2006) Beiträge zur Kenntnis asiatischer Leptoceridae (Trichoptera: Adicella, Athripsodes, Ceraclea, Leptocerus, Oecetis, Parasetodes, Tagalopsyche, Triaenodes, Trichosetodes). Linzer Biologische Beiträge, 38 (2), 1507–1530. [in German] Malicky, H. (2013a) Synonyms and possible synonyms of Asiatic Trichoptera. Braueria, 40, 41–54. [mostly in German] Malicky, H. (2013b) Trichoptera. Fauna Europaea version 2.6. Available from: http://www.faunaeur.org (accessed 7 April 2014) Malm, T. & Johanson, K.A. (2011) A new classification of the long-horned caddisflies (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae) based on molecular data. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11, 10–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-10 Málnás, K., Juhász, P., Müller, Z. & Kiss, B. (2012) First record of Oligoplectrum maculatum (Fourcroy, 1785) in Hungary (Trichoptera: Brachycentridae). Folia entomologica hungarica, 73, 5–8. Marlier, G. (1962) Genera des trichopteres de l'Afrique. Musee Royal de l'Afrique Centrale, Tervuren, Belgique, Annales, Serie in 8, Sciences Zoologiques 109, 264 pp. [in French] Móra, A., Boda, P., Csabai, Z., Deák, C., Málnás, K. & Csépes, E. (2005) Contribution to the mayfly, aquatic and semiaquatic bug, aquatic beetle, caddisfly and chironomid fauna of the River Tisza and its main inflows (Ephemeroptera, Heteroptera: Nepomorpha and Gerromorpha, Coleoptera: Hydradephaga and Hydrophiloidea, Trichoptera, Diptera: Chironomidae). Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matraensis, 29, 151–164. Móra, A., Juhász, P., Kiss, B. & Müller, Z. (2006) Faunistical results of the Trichoptera investigations carried out in the frames of the ecological survey of the surface waters of Hungary (ECOSURV) in 2005. – Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matraensis, 30, 359–367. Morse, J.C. (1981) A phylogeny and classification of family-group taxa of Leptoceridae. In: Moretti, G.P. (Ed), Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Trichoptera, Series Entomologica, 20, pp. 257–264. [W. Junk Publishers, The Hague] LARVA OF PARASETODES RESPERSELLUS Zootaxa 3841 (4) © 2014 Magnolia Press · 571 Morse, J.C. (2004) Insecta: Trichoptera. In: Yule, C.M. & Sen, Y.H. (Eds.), Freshwater invertebrates of the Malaysian Region. Academy of Sciences Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 501–539. Morse, J.C. (2014) Trichoptera World Checklist. Available from: http://www.clemson.edu/cafls/departments/esps/database/ trichopt (accessed 7 April 2014) Murgoci, A. (1969) Parasetodes respersella (Rambur) (Trichoptera) din bazinul cursului inferior al Dunării. Comunicări de zoologie, 7, 107–114. Nógrádi, S. & Uherkovich, Á. (2002) The caddisflies
Recommended publications
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U

    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U

    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
  • Makrozoobentos Kao Pokazatelj Ekološkog Potencijala Umjetnih Stajaćica

    Makrozoobentos Kao Pokazatelj Ekološkog Potencijala Umjetnih Stajaćica

    Makrozoobentos kao pokazatelj ekološkog potencijala umjetnih stajaćica Vučković, Natalija Doctoral thesis / Disertacija 2021 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:217:251464 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-11 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of Faculty of Science - University of Zagreb PRIRODOSLOVNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET BIOLOŠKI ODSJEK Natalija Vučković MAKROZOOBENTOS KAO POKAZATELJ EKOLOŠKOG POTENCIJALA UMJETNIH STAJAĆICA DOKTORSKI RAD Zagreb, 2020 PRIRODOSLOVNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET BIOLOŠKI ODSJEK Natalija Vučković MAKROZOOBENTOS KAO POKAZATELJ EKOLOŠKOG POTENCIJALA UMJETNIH STAJAĆICA DOKTORSKI RAD Mentor: Prof. dr. sc. Zlatko Mihaljević Zagreb, 2020 FACULTY OF SCIENCE DIVISION OF BIOLOGY Natalija Vučković MACROZOOBENTHOS AS AN INDICATOR OF THE ECOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF CONSTRUCTED LAKE DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Supervisor: Prof. dr. sc. Zlatko Mihaljević Zagreb, 2020 Ovaj je doktorski rad izrađen na Zoologijskom zavodu Prirodoslovno- matematičkog fakulteta, pod vodstvom Prof. dr. sc. Zlatka Mihaljevića, u sklopu Sveučilišnog poslijediplomskog doktorskog studija Biologije pri Biološkom odsjeku Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. MENTOR DOKTORSKE DISERTACIJE Prof. dr. sc. Zlatko Mihaljević Rođen je 21. siječnja 1966. godine u Varaždinu. Studij biologije (ekologija), upisuje 1986.
  • (Insecta, Trichoptera) of Four Adriatic Islands with a Note on Dna Barcoding

    (Insecta, Trichoptera) of Four Adriatic Islands with a Note on Dna Barcoding

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE NAT. CROAT. VOL. 28 No 2 403-413 ZAGREB December 31, 2019 original scientific paper/ izvorni znanstveni rad DOI 10.20302/NC.2019.28.26 CADDISFLY FAUNA CHARACTERISTICS (INSECTA, TRICHOPTERA) OF FOUR ADRIATIC ISLANDS WITH A NOTE ON DNA BARCODING Mladen Kučinić1*, Anđela Ćukušić2, Hrvoje Plavec3, Miro Landeka4, Mladen Plantak5, Marijana Vuković6, Višnja Bukvić7, Milivoj Franjević8, Sanja Žalac9 & Gordan Lukač10 1Department of Biology (Laboratory for Entomology), Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2Ministry of environment and energy, Radnička cesta 80/7, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 3Grožnjanska 18, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia 4 Marina Tartaglie 2, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia 5Elektroprojekt d.d., Civil and Architectural Engineering Department, Water Resources, Nature and Environmental protection, Alexandera von Humboldta 4, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 6Croatian Natural History Museum, Demetrova 1, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 7University Hercegovina, Blajburških žrtava 100, 88000 Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina 8Department for forestry and wildlife management, Faculty of Forestry, Svetošimunska 25, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb 9ZSC „Dr. Ivo Pevalek“, National park Plitvice Lakes, Josipa Jovića 19, 53231 Plitvička jezera, Croatia 10National park Paklenica, Dr. Franje Tuđmana 14a, 23244 Starigrad-Paklenica, Croatia Kučinić, M., Ćukušić, A., Plavec, H., Landeka, M., Plantak, M., Vuković, M., Bukvić, V., Franjević, M., Žalac, S. & Lukač, G.: Caddisfly fauna characteristics (Insecta, Trichoptera) of four Adriatic islands with a note on DNA barcoding. Nat. Croat., Vol. 28, No. 2., 403-413, 2019, Zagreb. To date, 13 species of Trichoptera from 11 genera and 8 families have been reported for the Adriatic islands of Cres, Krk, Pag and Hvar.
  • Buglife Ditches Report Vol1

    Buglife Ditches Report Vol1

    The ecological status of ditch systems An investigation into the current status of the aquatic invertebrate and plant communities of grazing marsh ditch systems in England and Wales Technical Report Volume 1 Summary of methods and major findings C.M. Drake N.F Stewart M.A. Palmer V.L. Kindemba September 2010 Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust 1 Little whirlpool ram’s-horn snail ( Anisus vorticulus ) © Roger Key This report should be cited as: Drake, C.M, Stewart, N.F., Palmer, M.A. & Kindemba, V. L. (2010) The ecological status of ditch systems: an investigation into the current status of the aquatic invertebrate and plant communities of grazing marsh ditch systems in England and Wales. Technical Report. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough. ISBN: 1-904878-98-8 2 Contents Volume 1 Acknowledgements 5 Executive summary 6 1 Introduction 8 1.1 The national context 8 1.2 Previous relevant studies 8 1.3 The core project 9 1.4 Companion projects 10 2 Overview of methods 12 2.1 Site selection 12 2.2 Survey coverage 14 2.3 Field survey methods 17 2.4 Data storage 17 2.5 Classification and evaluation techniques 19 2.6 Repeat sampling of ditches in Somerset 19 2.7 Investigation of change over time 20 3 Botanical classification of ditches 21 3.1 Methods 21 3.2 Results 22 3.3 Explanatory environmental variables and vegetation characteristics 26 3.4 Comparison with previous ditch vegetation classifications 30 3.5 Affinities with the National Vegetation Classification 32 Botanical classification of ditches: key points
  • Butterflies of North America

    Butterflies of North America

    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
  • A Case Study of Landscape-Level Species Loss and Trophic Composition Shift

    A Case Study of Landscape-Level Species Loss and Trophic Composition Shift

    J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 2010, 29(2):480–495 ’ 2010 by The North American Benthological Society DOI: 10.1899/09-029.1 Published online: 2 March 2010 Historical and contemporary biological diversity of Minnesota caddisflies: a case study of landscape-level species loss and trophic composition shift David C. Houghton1 Department of Biology, 33 East College Street, Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, Michigan 49242 USA Ralph W. Holzenthal2 Department of Entomology, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Ave., University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55108 USA Abstract. The biological diversity reflected by nearly 300,000 caddisfly specimens collected throughout Minnesota since 1985 was compared with that of 25,000 specimens recorded prior to 1950 and was analyzed based on the 5 caddisfly regions of Minnesota. In the Lake Superior, Northern, and Southeastern regions, .90% of species known historically from each region were recovered and additional species were discovered. In the Northwestern and Southern regions—the most disturbed areas of Minnesota—species recovery ranged from 60 to 70%. Historical and contemporary assemblages were similar to each other in the former 3 regions and markedly different in the latter 2. Prior to 1950, species in all trophic functional groups were widespread in all regions. A similar pattern still exists in the Lake Superior, Northern, and Southeastern regions, whereas the Northwestern and Southern regions are now dominated by filtering collectors in all sizes of lakes and streams. Over 65% of species extirpated from any region were in the long-lived families Limnephilidae and Phryganeidae, and 70% of these same species were in the shredder functional group.
  • The Trichoptera of North Carolina

    The Trichoptera of North Carolina

    Families and genera within Trichoptera in North Carolina Spicipalpia (closed-cocoon makers) Integripalpia (portable-case makers) RHYACOPHILIDAE .................................................60 PHRYGANEIDAE .....................................................78 Rhyacophila (Agrypnia) HYDROPTILIDAE ...................................................62 (Banksiola) Oligostomis (Agraylea) (Phryganea) Dibusa Ptilostomis Hydroptila Leucotrichia BRACHYCENTRIDAE .............................................79 Mayatrichia Brachycentrus Neotrichia Micrasema Ochrotrichia LEPIDOSTOMATIDAE ............................................81 Orthotrichia Lepidostoma Oxyethira (Theliopsyche) Palaeagapetus LIMNEPHILIDAE .....................................................81 Stactobiella (Anabolia) GLOSSOSOMATIDAE ..............................................65 (Frenesia) Agapetus Hydatophylax Culoptila Ironoquia Glossosoma (Limnephilus) Matrioptila Platycentropus Protoptila Pseudostenophylax Pycnopsyche APATANIIDAE ..........................................................85 (fixed-retreat makers) Apatania Annulipalpia (Manophylax) PHILOPOTAMIDAE .................................................67 UENOIDAE .................................................................86 Chimarra Neophylax Dolophilodes GOERIDAE .................................................................87 (Fumanta) Goera (Sisko) (Goerita) Wormaldia LEPTOCERIDAE .......................................................88 PSYCHOMYIIDAE ....................................................68
  • Of the Korean Peninsula

    Of the Korean Peninsula

    Journal288 of Species Research 9(3):288-323, 2020JOURNAL OF SPECIES RESEARCH Vol. 9, No. 3 A checklist of Trichoptera (Insecta) of the Korean Peninsula Sun-Jin Park and Dongsoo Kong* Department of Life Science, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea *Correspondent: [email protected] A revised checklist of Korean Trichoptera is provided for the species recorded from the Korean Peninsula, including both North and South Korea. The checklist includes bibliographic research as well as results after reexamination of some specimens. For each species, we provide the taxonomic literature that examined Korean Trichoptera materials or mentioned significant taxonomic treatments regarding to Korean species. We also provide the records of unnamed species based on larval identification for further study. Based on taxonomic considerations, 20 species among the previously known nominal species in Korea are deleted or synonymized, and three species omitted from the previous lists, Hydropsyche athene Malicky and Chantaramongkol, 2000, H. simulata Mosely, 1942 and Helicopsyche coreana Mey, 1991 are newly added to the checklist. Hydropsyche formosana Ulmer, 1911 is recorded from the Korean Peninsula for the first time by the identification of Hydropsyche KD. In addition, we recognized 14 species of larvae separated with only tentative alphabetic designations. As a result, this new Korean Trichoptera checklist includes 218 currently recognized species in 66 genera and 25 families from the Korean Peninsula. Keywords: ‌caddisflies, catalogue, history, North Korea, South Korea Ⓒ 2020 National Institute of Biological Resources DOI:10.12651/JSR.2020.9.3.288 INTRODUCTION Democratic Republic (North Korea). Since the mid 1970s, several scientists within the Republic of Korea (South Trichoptera is the seventh-largest order among Insecta, Korea) have studied Trichoptera.
  • Investigating the Effects of Winter Drawdowns on the Ecological Character of Littoral Zones in Massachusetts Lakes

    Investigating the Effects of Winter Drawdowns on the Ecological Character of Littoral Zones in Massachusetts Lakes

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses March 2020 INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES Jason R. Carmignani University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Carmignani, Jason R., "INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES" (2020). Doctoral Dissertations. 1816. https://doi.org/10.7275/j5k1-fz29 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/1816 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2020 Organismic and Evolutionary Biology © Copyright by Jason R. Carmignani 2020 All Rights Reserved INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Approved as to style and content by: ___________________________________ Allison H. Roy, Chair ___________________________________ Andy J. Danylchuk, Member ___________________________________ Cristina Cox Fernandes, Member ___________________________________ Peter D. Hazelton, Member ___________________________________ Jason T. Stolarksi, Member ___________________________________ Paige S.
  • C:\My Documents\Rasmussenfiles

    C:\My Documents\Rasmussenfiles

    IDENTIFICATION MANUAL FOR THE CADDISFLY (TRICHOPTERA) LARVAE OF FLORIDA REVISED EDITION 2004 Manuel L. Pescador Andrew K. Rasmussen Steven C. Harris State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Resource Management Tallahassee Development of this document was funded by a grant from the Clean Water Act Section 319 Final Report for DEP Contract Number WM715 December 2004 IDENTIFICATION MANUAL FOR THE CADDISFLY (TRICHOPTERA) LARVAE OF FLORIDA REVISED EDITION 2004 by Manuel L. Pescador, Ph.D. Professor of Entomology Florida A&M University Tallahassee, Florida 32307-4100 and Research Associate Florida State Collection of Arthropods Gainesville, Florida 32611 Andrew K. Rasmussen, Ph.D. Research Associate Entomology, Center for Water Quality Florida A&M University Tallahassee, Florida 32307-4100 and Florida State Collection of Arthropods Gainesville, Florida 32611 Steven C. Harris, Ph.D. Professor of Biology Clarion University Clarion, Pennsylvania 16214-1232 Karen Savage, Project Manager Division of Water Resource Management Florida Department of Environmental Protection Requests for copies of this document should be addressed to: Bureau of Laboratories, Attn: Joy Jackson Florida Department of Environmental Protection 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 This document is available at the following web site:http://www.dep.state.fl.us/labs/library/keys.htm TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1 General overview of the order............................................
  • Five New Species of Caddisflies (Trichoptera: Insecta) from Upper Tenasserim Range, Thailand and Myanmar

    Five New Species of Caddisflies (Trichoptera: Insecta) from Upper Tenasserim Range, Thailand and Myanmar

    Zootaxa 4524 (3): 351–358 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4524.3.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C1975EB8-F799-4360-BA89-90990C97EEB3 Five new species of Caddisflies (Trichoptera: Insecta) from Upper Tenasserim Range, Thailand and Myanmar PONGSAK LAUDEE1,3 & HANS MALICKY2 1Department of Fishery and Coastal Resources, Faculty of Science and Industrial Technology, Prince of Songkla University, Surat Thani Campus, Muang District, Surat Thani Province, Thailand 84100, E-mail: [email protected] 2Sonnengasse 13, A–3293 Lunz am See, Austria 3Corresponding author Abstract Five new species of caddisflies are described from the Upper Tenasserim Range, including Chimarra keawpradubi n. sp., Ecnomus niyomwasi n. sp., Psychomyia pinsuwanae n. sp., Leptocerus suwannarati n. sp., and Setodes lertpongsombatae n. sp., based on distinctive characters of male genitalia. Chimarra keawpradubi n. sp. differs from other Chimarra spp. in ventral aspect of inferior appendages, each of which is rectangular with a bulging process apicoventrally and with an acute apex. The basal part of each inferior appendage is square and the apical part is narrow in E. niyomwasi n. sp., dif- ferentiating it from other species in the genus. Psychomyia pinsuwanae n. sp. differs from P. amphiaraos Malicky and Chantaramongkol 1997, a closely similar species, by characters of the inferior appendages; the inner branch of each infe- rior appendage has a long, straight spine on its inner side. Leptocerus suwannarati n. sp. can be distinguished from other Leptocerus spp.
  • Key Factors for Biodiversity of Urban Water Systems

    Key Factors for Biodiversity of Urban Water Systems

    Key factors for biodiversity of urban water systems Kim Vermonden Key factors for biodiversity of urban water systems Vermonden, K., 2010. Key factors for biodiversity of urban water systems. PhD-thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen. © 2010 K. Vermonden, all rights reserved. ISBN: 978-94-91066-01-6 Layout: A. M. Antheunisse Printed by: Ipskamp Drukkers BV, Enschede This project was financially supported by the Interreg IIIb North-West Europe programme Urban water and the municipalities of Nijmegen and Arnhem. Key factors for biodiversity of urban water systems Een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Informatica PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 25 november 2010 om 10.30 uur precies door Kim Vermonden geboren op 20 november 1980 te Breda Promotores: Prof. dr. ir. A.J. Hendriks Prof. dr. J.G.M. Roelofs Copromotores: Dr. R.S.E.W. Leuven Dr. G. van der Velde Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. H. Siepel (voorzitter) Prof. dr. A.J.M. Smits Dr. J. Borum (Kopenhagen Universiteit, Denemarken) Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 9 Chapter 2 Does upward seepage of river water and storm water runoff 19 determine water quality of urban drainage systems in lowland areas? A case study for the Rhine-Meuse delta (Hydrological Processes 23: 3110-3120) Chapter 3 Species pool versus site limitations of macrophytes in urban 39 waters (Aquatic Sciences 72: 379-389) Chapter 4 Urban drainage systems: An undervalued habitat for aquatic 59 macroinvertebrates (Biological Conservation 142: 1105-1115) Chapter 5 Key factors for chironomid diversity in urban waters 81 (submitted) Chapter 6 Environmental factors determining invasibility of urban 103 waters for exotic macroinvertebrates (submitted to Diversity and Distributions) Chapter 7 Synthesis 121 Summary 133 Samenvatting 137 Dankwoord 141 Curriculum vitae 145 Urban water system Nijmegen.