UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE on the Thin Blue Line: Examining the Mexican American Officer Experience In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE on the Thin Blue Line: Examining the Mexican American Officer Experience In UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE On The Thin Blue Line: Examining the Mexican American Officer Experience in the Los Angeles Police Department A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Roberto Gallardo September 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Adalberto Aguirre, Chairperson Dr. Tanya Nieri Dr. Augustine Kposowa Copyright by Roberto Gallardo 2018 The Dissertation of Roberto Gallardo is approved: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION On The Thin Blue Line: Examining the Mexican American Officer Experience in the Los Angeles Police Department by Roberto Gallardo Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in Sociology University of California, Riverside, September 2018 Dr. Adalberto Aguirre, Chairperson This study focuses on the impact of race on Mexican­American minority law enforcement officers’ ideology and experiences in the LAPD. Previous studies have focused on the issue of race within a municipal police department, however these studies have generally not included Hispanic/Latino officers. Most research has strictly focused on the impact of race on White and African­American officers, the impact of race on Hispanic/Latino officers (and especially Mexican­American officers) is relatively unknown. Interviews of Mexican­American officers were used gain the information required for analysis. The study finds that using a binary view of race, respondents understand and interpret interactions with other officers under a color blind ideology. Respondents also understand racism and discrimination as strictly an overt action or response. This is influenced by their occupational culture, their own history, and negative interactions with the community. iv Table of Contents I. Chapter 1: Introduction A. Introduction……………………………………...………………….……..1 B. The Thin Blue Line: Us v Us? …………………….……………………..6 C. What Do We Know About Minorities in Policing?.....................................7 D. Minorities in a Minority­Majority Department……………..……………..8 E. Why Does it Matter?…………….……………………………………….10 F. Chapter Outlines………………………………………………………....11 II. Chapter 2:Background I History, Policing, and the LAPD A. Roots of Modern Police Practices………….……………………...……..13 B. Police Culture………………………………………………………… …23 C. Latinos in Law Enforcement……………… …………………………….28 D. State and Local…………………………………………...……………....31 E. Local Police Departments…..……………………………………………33 F. Racial Composition of Los Angeles and the LAPD Today……………...33 III. Chapter 3:Background II Minorities and the LAPD A. Hispanic/Latinos and the LAPD…………………………….…………...35 B. The Early Period…….…...……………………………………………....36 C. Mexican Activism……………………………………………………….40 D. Deportations and Labor………………...…………….…………………..42 E. Mexican Americans & Mexican American Youth…………………..…...43 v F. Sleepy Lagoon…………………………………………………………...44 G. 1943 Los Angeles………………………………………………………..45 H. Bloody Christmas and Police Brutality………....………………………..47 I. LAPD,Social Movements, and an Escalating Tension…………………..51 J. Lawsuits, Professional Minority Recruiting, and an increase in Tension..57 K. Can’t We All Just Get Along?....................................................................59 L. California’s Political Climate…...…………...…………………………...66 M. CRASHing Rampart …...………………………………………………..67 N. 2007 MaCarthur Park…………………………………...………………..69 O. The Dorner Incident……………………………………...……………....69 IV. Chapter 4: Review of the Research Literature A. Early Minority Officers……………………………...…………………...72 B. Minority Experiences in Policing ...…………………...………………...75 C. Why Research On Latino Police?..............................................................85 D. Mexican American Officers………………………………...…………....91 V. Chapter 5:Theoretical Framework A. Contemporary Race Theory……………………………………………...94 B. Racial Formation Theory………………………………………………...96 C. Racism…………………………...…………………………………….....98 D. Aren’t All Minorities the Same?..............................................................100 E. A Latino Threat Narrative……………………………………………....103 vi F. Committing to the Narrative …………………………………………...108 VI. Chapter 6: Methodology A. Recruitment……………………………………………………………..111 B. Sample………………………………………………………………......114 C. Pre­Interview Procedures……………………………………………….115 D. Building Rapport with Participants…...………………………………...116 E. Interviews…………………………………………………………….....120 F. Coding and Data………………………………………………………..123 VII. Chapter 7:Results A. Self Identification……………………………….……………………....125 B. Motivations for Becoming a Police Officer…………………...………..128 C. Academy Training….…………………………………………………...140 D. Culture……………………………………………………………….….143 E. Blue ID……………………………………………………………….....146 F. Retaliation……………………………………………………………....148 G. Race Based Effect……………………………………………………....152 H. Promotions……………………………………………………………...156 I. Racism & Discrimination……………………………………………....165 J. The Community………………………………………………………...171 VIII. Chapter 8: Analysis and Discussion A. Self Identification………………………………………………………181 vii B. Motivations……………………………………………………………..185 C. Culture…………………………………………………………………..190 D. Blue ID……………………………………………………………….....193 E. Promotions……………………………………………………………...195 F. Racism & Discrimination……………………………………………....198 G. The Community………………………………………………………...202 IX. Chapter 9: Conclusion & Future Directions A. Conclusion……………………………………………..…………….....207 B. Interest Convergence…………………………………………………...213 C. Future Directions ……………………………………………………... 215 X. Work Cited & Bibliography ……...…………………………………………...217 viii CHAPTER 1:Introduction Introduction On August 9th 2014, a pair of unarmed African American teenagers were stopped by Officer Darren Wilson in possible connection with a local convenience store robbery. The officer was searching for two suspects who were accused of stealing cigarettes from the store earlier in the day. The teenagers were initially walking in the street as Officer Wilson approached in his vehicle. At a point in the interaction, a struggle ensued and shots were fired. While both teens ran, Wilson then encountered one of the juveniles with his weapon drawn. Officer Wilson proceeded to fire his weapon several times. That teen, Michael Brown, 18, was shot and killed by Officer Wilson on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri. What actually happened during the incident which ended with the death of Brown, was widely disputed by witnesses on the scene and Officer Wilson himself. In the official report of the incident, Wilson claimed that Brown reached for the officer’s weapon when he approached him in the street. Where the initial shots rang out, the suspects ran, and Wilson took chase after Brown. According to Wilson, Brown stopped running, turned around and charged at him with malicious intent. Feeling he had no other choice, Wilson fired at Brown several times. The last of the 12 shots fired by Wilson proved to be the fatal shot. Brown was unarmed at the time (Department of Justice 2015). Initial reports from eyewitnesses on the scene painted a different picture than what Wilson, and later, what the official report stated. Some witnesses stated that Brown did not charge at Wilson, but instead had his arms up when he was shot. The Department 1 of Justice concluded later that the witnesses who claimed that Brown had his hands up could not be considered ‘credible’ (This included the other teenager who ran from the scene). The other teenager at the scene painted a different picture than the official testimony and investigation. Dorian Johnson, a friend of Brown, gave his account of the incident. Johnson said the two were approached by Officer Brown as they were walking in the street. Wilson pulled up to them and said, “Get the fuck on the sidewalk?” They replied that they were almost to where they were going and that they would soon be out of the street. Wilson then blocked the young men with his vehicle and attempted to open the door but was hindered by Johnson and Brown, who were simply standing there. The door closed on the officer, and Wilson then proceeded to grab Brown from the neck through the window. Brown attempted to escape the grasp, all while never reaching for the officer’s weapon. Wilson drew his firearm and said “ I’ll shoot you” and purposely discharged his weapon hitting Brown in the arm. Brown was able to free himself and the two teens attempted to flee. Wilson then shot at Brown as he was running away. Brown then stopped and turned around with hands up, but not completely because he had been hit. Johnson claimed Brown said “I don’t have a gun” and tried to repeat the sentence but was shot several times. Johnson maintained that Brown never attempted to run at Officer Wilson (Department of Justice 2015). The national media caught wind of the incident when the details of the shooting became public. The fact that Brown was unarmed, and that some witnesses claimed that he raised his hands to give up, and that the officer proceeded to shoot him, sparked 2 further outrage in the community as well as across the nation. Protest and marches began locally in Ferguson; then they spread across the country. This incident prompted questions regarding the use of deadly force by the officer. It also brought to the surface national attention about the possible impact that race had in the incident, and other similar incidents in Ferguson and across the country; Wilson
Recommended publications
  • Bad Cops: a Study of Career-Ending Misconduct Among New York City Police Officers
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Bad Cops: A Study of Career-Ending Misconduct Among New York City Police Officers Author(s): James J. Fyfe ; Robert Kane Document No.: 215795 Date Received: September 2006 Award Number: 96-IJ-CX-0053 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Bad Cops: A Study of Career-Ending Misconduct Among New York City Police Officers James J. Fyfe John Jay College of Criminal Justice and New York City Police Department Robert Kane American University Final Version Submitted to the United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice February 2005 This project was supported by Grant No. 1996-IJ-CX-0053 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of views in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Communique from an Ex-Cop
    communiqué from an ex-cop by christopher jordan dorner annotated by research and destroy new york city new york / los angeles 2013 From: Christopher Jordan Dorner /76486 To: America Subj: Last resort7 Regarding CF# 07-0042818 I know most of you who personally know me are in disbelief to hear from media reports that I am suspected of committing such horrendous murders and have taken drastic and shocking actions in the last couple of ________ 1 Posted on Facebook on February 4th, 2013 at 1:48 AM, according to a February 6th search warrant (see Appendix A; Search Warrant. Superior Court of California, County of Orange. 6 Feb. 2013. 17). 2 From the beginning, all news outlets have referred to Dorner’s text as a “manifesto,” often preceded by the word “rambling,” (a Google News phrase search for “rambling manifesto” yielded 1,860 articles at the height of the manhunt) though more often “angry” (3,930 articles). Labeling a document a “manifesto” is one way the media marks its author as mentally unstable, or, even worse, a lone voice yelling into the wilderness. Revelations of isolated lives spent in cabins, whether in the remote Mon- tana wilderness or the snow-capped mountains of Big Bear, CA, paint an image of an unhinged, anti-social individual wholly out of touch with reality, if not totally against it (the climactic self-inflicted gunshot wound provides ultimate confirmation of this). The Riverside Chief of Police articulated early on the portrait of a suspect both soli- tary and certifiable: “My opinion of the suspect is unprintable.
    [Show full text]
  • When Rodney King Was Beaten in 1991 by LAPD Officers, and Rioters
    FROM THE AGE OF DRAGNET TO THE AGE OF THE INTERNET: TRACKING CHANGES WITHIN THE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT Wellford W. Wilms, UCLA School of Public Policy and Education Following the Rodney King beating in 1991, rioters later burned and looted South Central Los Angeles on the news that the accused Los Angeles Police officers had been acquitted. It seemed that things could hardly get worse. But the King beating only served to focus public attention on the problems of policing a huge and diverse city like Los Angeles. It was the beginning of a series of wrenching changes that would all but paralyze the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) for more than a decade. Following the King beating, then-Mayor Tom Bradley established the Christopher Commission (named after chairman, former Secretary of State Warren Christopher) to delve into the underlying causes. The Commission sought to reveal the roots of the LAPD’s problems. According to the Commission, since William Parker had become chief in 1950 and took steps to professionalize the department, officers learned to respond to crime aggressively and swiftly. Strapped for resources to police a huge city of 465 square miles, Parker relied on efficiency to squeeze production from his officers. He began the practice that persists today of evaluating officers on statistical performance – response time, number of calls handled, citations issued and arrests made. Not surprisingly, the LAPD began to pride itself on being a high profile paramilitary organization with “hard-nosed” officers, an image that was greatly enhanced by the radio and TV program, “Dragnet.” But while the Christopher Commission acknowledged that aggressive, statistics-driven policing produced results, it did so at a high cost, pitting residents against police creating a “siege mentality” within the department (Independent Commission, 1991, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rampart Scandal
    Human Rights Alert, NGO PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: [email protected] Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert 10-04-08 DRAFT 2010 UPR: Human Rights Alert (Ngo) - The United States Human Rights Record – Allegations, Conclusions, Recommendations. Executive Summary1 1. Allegations Judges in the United States are prone to racketeering from the bench, with full patronizing by US Department of Justice and FBI. The most notorious displays of such racketeering today are in: a) Deprivation of Liberty - of various groups of FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons), and b) Deprivation of the Right for Property - collusion of the courts with large financial institutions in perpetrating fraud in the courts on homeowners. Consequently, whole regions of the US, and Los Angeles is provided as an example, are managed as if they were extra-constitutional zones, where none of the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights are applicable. Fraudulent computers systems, which were installed at the state and US courts in the past couple of decades are key enabling tools for racketeering by the judges. Through such systems they issue orders and judgments that they themselves never consider honest, valid, and effectual, but which are publicly displayed as such. Such systems were installed in violation of the Rule Making Enabling Act. Additionally, denial of Access to Court Records - to inspect and to copy – a First Amendment and a Human Right - is integral to the alleged racketeering at the courts - through concealing from the public court records in such fraudulent computer systems.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Police Brutality And
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Police Brutality and Communities of Color A graduate project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Public Administration in Public Sector Management and Leadership By Edith Jacqueline Gonzalez August 2019 i The thesis of Edith Jacqueline Gonzalez is approved: _________________________________________ ______________ Dr. Sarmistha Majumdar Date _________________________________________ ______________ Dr. Boris Ricks Date _________________________________________ ______________ Dr. Henrik Minassians, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Dedication Above all I would like to thank God almighty for giving me the strength and determination to complete this Master’s program. I am grateful to everyone who believed in me and encouraged my journey to higher education. I would like to dedicate this research project to my mother, who crossed borders so that that I could be here. Mom, thank you for making the biggest sacrifice—leaving your family, leaving your country, leaving everything you knew to provide me with the opportunities you never had. I am the product of your sacrifices, hard work, and love. Thank you for being the shining example of what I wanted to be, for every hug, every prayer, word of encouragement, and act of love. All that I am or hope to be, I owe to you. To my younger siblings, Stephanie and Genesis, whom without knowing it inspired me to pursue higher education. If I can do it, you can do it too. For every first generation student
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Gang Injunctions on Crime: a Study of Los Angeles from 1988-2014
    Department of Criminology Working Paper No. 2018-3.0 Effect of Gang Injunctions on Crime: A Study of Los Angeles from 1988-2014 Greg Ridgeway Jeffrey Grogger Ruth Moyer John MacDonald This paper can be downloaded from the Penn Criminology Working Papers Collection: http://crim.upenn.edu Effect of Gang Injunctions on Crime: A Study of Los Angeles from 1988-2014 Greg Ridgeway Jeffrey Grogger Ruth Moyer John MacDonald Department of Criminology Harris School of Public Policy Department of Criminology Department of Criminology Department of Statistics University of Chicago University of Pennsylvania Department of Sociology University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania Abstract Objective: Assess the effect of civil gang injunctions on crime. Methods: Data include crimes reported to the Los Angeles Police Department from 1988 to 2014 and the timing and geography of the safety zones that the injunctions create, from the first injunction in 1993 to the 46th injunction in 2013, the most recent during our study period. Because the courts activate the injunctions at different timepoints, we can compare the affected geography before and after the imposition of the injunction contrasted with comparison areas. We conduct separate analyses examining the average short-term impact and average long-term impact. The Rampart scandal and its investigation (1998-2000) caused the interruption of three injunctions creating a natural experiment. We use a series of difference-in-difference analyses to identify the effect of gang injunctions, including various methods for addressing spatial and temporal correlation. Results: Injunctions appear to reduce total crime by an estimated 5% in the short-term and as much as 18% in the long-term, with larger effects for assaults, 19% in the short-term and 35% in the long-term.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Response to Gangs: a Multi-Site Study
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Police Response to Gangs: A Multi-Site Study Author(s): Charles M. Katz; Vincent J. Webb Document No.: 205003 Date Received: April 2004 Award Number: 98-IJ-CX-0078 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Police Response to Gangs: A Multi-Site Study 1 Prepared for the National Institute of Justice by Charles M. Katz Vincent J. Webb Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology December 2003 Phoenix, Arizona 1 This research report was funded by the National Institute of Justice, Grant No. 1998-IJ-CX-0078. The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the National Institute of Justice. Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................ i Research Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................ i Research Design and Methodology.................................................................................. i Research Results and Conclusions..................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Consent Marcy Strauss
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 92 Article 4 Issue 1 Fall Fall 2001 Reconstructing Consent Marcy Strauss Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Marcy Strauss, Reconstructing Consent, 92 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 211 (2001-2002) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/01/9201-0211 THE JOURNAL o CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol 92, No I in US.A. Copyright 0 2001 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed RECONSTRUCTING CONSENT MARCY STRAUSS* "Will you walk into my parlor? Said the Spider to thefly. " Every year, I witness the same mass incredulity. Why, one hundred criminal procedure students jointly wonder, would someone "voluntarily" consent to allow a police officer to search the trunk of his car, knowing that massive amounts of cocaine are easily visible there?2 The answer, I have come to believe, is * Professor of Law, Loyola Law School. J.D. 1981, Georgetown University Law Center; B.S. 1978, Northwestern University. As always, I am grateful to my dear friend Erwin Chemerinsky for reading and critiquing this manuscript. Thanks are owed to my research assistants Karin Necessary, Kris An, James Warren, Lisa Jones, and especially Aaron Agness. This Article is dedicated with love and admiration to my oldest son,Jeffrey Chemerinsky, as he reaches the age of legal consent.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Dr. Todd Boyd CTCS 510: Reagan's America (Crack Nation) Wednesdays (Fall 2012) Seminar 1:00-3:50 /SCA 216 Screening 4:00-6:5
    Dr. Todd Boyd CTCS 510: Reagan’s America (Crack Nation) Wednesdays (Fall 2012) Seminar 1:00-3:50 /SCA 216 Screening 4:00-6:50/SCA 112 Dr. Boyd’s office hours: Wednesdays & Thursdays 12:00-12:45 Office hour meetings are by appointment. To make an appointment for Dr. Boyd’s office hours call (213.740.3334) or visit the Critical Studies main office (SCA 320). Course Description: This course will study cinema, media, and popular culture during the “Reagan Era,” with a specific focus on the politics of the crack cocaine epidemic that began in the mid 1980s. Using the landmark N.W.A. album Straight Outta Compton (1988) as a cultural touchstone, the course will investigate the relationship between the image of Ronald Reagan’s presidency (“Reaganomics”), the influx of cocaine into American cities, and the ensuing “crack culture” that emerged and came to define this era. This course will highlight a number of cultural themes, historical issues, political controversies, and other societal trends, including; the Iran/Contra scandal, the prison industrial complex, gang culture, the death of basketball star Len Bias, gangsta rap, hip hop culture, hip hop cinema, the 1988 presidential election, the travails of Washington DC mayor Marion Barry, the LA riots, the Rampart scandal, and the murders of Tupac Shakur and Biggie Smalls, among other topics. These topics will be pursued in the interest of addressing larger questions such as; what role have drugs historically played in American society? To what extent do drugs reveal broader issues relative to race and class? What is the connection between politics, private enterprise, and issues of “law & order”? How have all of these issues been reflected in popular culture? Course Requirements: 1.Oral Presentation on one of the films screened in class: You will select one of the course screenings for your in-class presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Assessment for the Lincoln Heights Jail Los Angeles, California
    CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE LINCOLN HEIGHTS JAIL LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering Environmental Management Group 1149 S. Broadway, Suite 600 Los Angeles, California 90015-2213 Prepared by: AECOM 401 West A Street, Suite 1200 San Diego, California 92101 Authors: Jeremy Hollins, M.A. Monica Mello, M.A. Linda Kry, B.A. September 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1 Report Organization ............................................................................................................ 1 Project Description.............................................................................................................. 1 Project Location .................................................................................................................. 2 Regulatory Setting .............................................................................................................. 2 State Regulations ....................................................................................................... 2 Local Regulations ...................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2 PROJECT SETTING..........................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Meek Mill's Trauma: Brutal Policing As an Adverse Childhood Experience, 33 St
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives Faculty Scholarship 2021 Meek Mill’s Trauma: Brutal Policing as an Adverse Childhood Experience Todd J. Clark Caleb Gregory Conrad andré douglas pond cummings University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law, [email protected] Amy Dunn Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Todd J. Clark et. al., Meek Mill's Trauma: Brutal Policing As an Adverse Childhood Experience, 33 St. Thomas L. Rev. 158 (2021). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLARK ET AL. FINAL.DOCX (Do Not Delete) 6/11/21 11:00 AM MEEK MILL’S TRAUMA: BRUTAL POLICING AS AN ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCE TODD J. CLARK* CALEB GREGORY CONRAD** andré douglas pond cummings*** & AMY DUNN JOHNSON**** INTRODUCTION Meek Mill’s life and career have been punctuated by trauma, from his child- hood lived on the streets of Philadelphia, through his rise to fame and eventual arrival as one of hip hop’s household names. In his 2018 track Trauma,1 Meek * Professor of Law, St. Thomas University College of Law; J.D., University of Pittsburgh School of Law. First, I would like to thank God for putting me in a position to write about and shed light on issues that I find compelling.
    [Show full text]
  • William H. Parker and the Thin Blue Line: Politics, Public
    WILLIAM H. PARKER AND THE THIN BLUE LINE: POLITICS, PUBLIC RELATIONS AND POLICING IN POSTWAR LOS ANGELES By Alisa Sarah Kramer Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In History Chair: Michael Kazin, Kimberly Sims1 Dean o f the College of Arts and Sciences 3 ^ Date 2007 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY UBRARY Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3286654 Copyright 2007 by Kramer, Alisa Sarah All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 3286654 Copyright 2008 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. © COPYRIGHT by Alisa Sarah Kramer 2007 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. I dedicate this dissertation in memory of my sister Debby.
    [Show full text]