DOCSLIB.ORG

FATE Case Studies Handbook Is a Collection of Examples For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FATE Case Studies Handbook Is a Collection of Examples For CASE STUDIES HANDBOOK Revisione date: 3/2/32011 ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAMMES Version: Final version AND MILITARY BROWNFIELDS RESTRUCTURING Action 4.1 Tools to manage the process F.A.T.E Table of contents Table of contents ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 13 2. SUMMARIES OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAMMES ................................................................. 14 Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy ............................................................................................................ 14 Pomurje Region, Slovenia .................................................................................................................. 14 Drama Prefecture, Greece................................................................................................................. 14 West-transdanubian Region, Hungary .............................................................................................. 15 Vojvodina Province, Serbia ................................................................................................................ 15 Slavonia and Baranja County, Croatia ............................................................................................... 15 South-East Development Region, Romania ...................................................................................... 16 North-East Development Region, Romania ...................................................................................... 16 North-West Development Region, Romania ..................................................................................... 16 South-West Development Region, Romania ..................................................................................... 17 2.1. Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy ................................................................................................ 18 Brief description of the interviewed entrepreneurship support organisation ............................. 18 Entrepreneurship support network of the territory ..................................................................... 18 Implemented entrepreneurship support projects/programmes .................................................. 20 Best practice entrepreneurship support project/programme ...................................................... 20 Objectives and results achieved so far .......................................................................................... 22 Development of the project/program .......................................................................................... 22 Customization to address specific needs ...................................................................................... 22 Financial aspects of the project/program ..................................................................................... 22 Main obstacles to the implementation ......................................................................................... 23 Premises and infrastructure that turned crucial to the implementation of the programme ....... 23 Most important services ............................................................................................................... 23 Other involved actors of the entrepreneurship support network ................................................ 23 Exit strategy ................................................................................................................................... 23 2.2. Pomurje Region, Slovenia ...................................................................................................... 24 Brief description of the interviewed entrepreneurship support organisation ............................. 24 Entrepreneurship support network of the territory ..................................................................... 24 Implemented entrepreneurship support projects/programmes .................................................. 25 FATE case studies handbook 2 Best practice entrepreneurship support project/programme ...................................................... 25 Objectives and results achieved so far .......................................................................................... 26 Development of the project/program .......................................................................................... 26 Customization to address specific needs ...................................................................................... 26 Financial aspects of the project/program ..................................................................................... 26 Main obstacles to the implementation ......................................................................................... 26 Premises and infrastructure that turned crucial to the implementation of the programme ....... 27 Most important services ............................................................................................................... 27 Other involved actors of the entrepreneurship support network ................................................ 27 Exit strategy ................................................................................................................................... 27 2.3. Drama Prefecture, Greece ..................................................................................................... 28 Brief description of the interviewed entrepreneurship support organisation ............................. 28 Entrepreneurship support network of the territory ..................................................................... 29 Implemented entrepreneurship support projects/programmes .................................................. 30 Best practice entrepreneurship support project/programme ...................................................... 39 Objectives and results achieved so far .......................................................................................... 40 Development of the project/program .......................................................................................... 40 Customization to address specific needs ...................................................................................... 41 Financial aspects of the project/program ..................................................................................... 41 Main obstacles to the implementation ......................................................................................... 41 Premises and infrastructure that turned crucial to the implementation of the programme ....... 41 Most important services ................................................................................................................... 42 Other involved actors of the entrepreneurship support network ................................................ 42 Exit strategy ................................................................................................................................... 42 2.4. West-transdanubian Region, Hungary .................................................................................. 43 Brief description of the interviewed entrepreneurship support organisations ............................ 43 Entrepreneurship support network of the territory ..................................................................... 44 Implemented entrepreneurship support projects/programmes .................................................. 45 Best practice entrepreneurship support project/programme ...................................................... 45 Objectives and results achieved so far .......................................................................................... 45 Development of the project/program .......................................................................................... 46 Customization to address specific needs ...................................................................................... 46 Financial aspects of the project/program ..................................................................................... 46 Main obstacles to the implementation ......................................................................................... 47 FATE case studies handbook 3 Premises and infrastructure that turned crucial to the implementation of the programme ....... 47 Most important services ............................................................................................................... 47 Other involved actors of the entrepreneurship support network ................................................ 47 Exit strategy ................................................................................................................................... 47 2.5. Vojvodina Province, Serbia .................................................................................................... 48 Brief description of the interviewed entrepreneurship support organisations ............................ 48 Entrepreneurship support network of the territory ..................................................................... 48 Implemented entrepreneurship support projects/programmes .................................................. 48 Best practice entrepreneurship support project/programme ...................................................... 49 Objectives
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Industry Report Travel Agency, Tour Operator and Other Reservation Service and Related Activities 2016 BULGARIA
    Industry Report Travel agency, tour operator and other reservation service and related activities 2016 BULGARIA seenews.com/reports This industry report is part of your subcription access to SeeNews | seenews.com/subscription CONTENTS I. KEY INDICATORS II. INTRODUCTION III. REVENUES IV. EXPENSES V. PROFITABILITY VI. EMPLOYMENT 1 SeeNews Industry Report In 2015 there were a total of 1,878 companies operating in I. KEY INDICATORS the industry. In 2014 their number totalled 1,824. The Travel agency, tour operator and other reservation NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN TRAVEL AGENCY, TOUR OPERATOR service and related activities industry in Bulgaria was AND OTHER RESERVATION SERVICE AND RELATED ACTIVITIES represented by 1,962 companies at the end of 2016, INDUSTRY BY SECTORS compared to 1,878 in the previous year and 1,824 in 2014. SECTOR 2016 2015 2014 TOUR OPERATOR ACTIVITIES 1,135 1,084 1,061 The industry's net profit amounted to BGN 30,829,000 in TRAVEL AGENCY ACTIVITIES 532 512 485 2016. OTHER RESERVATION SERVICE AND RELATED 295 282 278 ACTIVITIES The industry's total revenue was BGN 1,088,582,000 in 2016, up by 6.67% compared to the previous year. The combined costs of the companies in the Travel agency, tour operator and other reservation service and related III. REVENUES activities industry reached BGN 1,053,259,000 in 2016, up by 5.77% year-on-year. The total revenue in the industry was BGN 1,088,582,000 in 2016, BGN 1,020,466,000 in 2015 and 1,001,551,000 in 2014. The industry's total revenue makes up 1.17% to the country's Gross domestic product (GDP) in 2016, compared to 1.14% Total revenue for 2015 and 1.17% in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Report
    ANALYTICAL REPORT CAPACITY OF THE MUNICIPALITIES OF BANSKO, BELITSA, RAZLOG AND YAKORUDA FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTIVITIES RELATED TO ALTERNATIVE TOURISM IN A CROSS-BORDER REGION Part One 1. General Characteristics of the region а. Territory, towns, natural assets The four municipalities are located at the foot of the Pirin and Rila Mountains and in the Western-most part of the Rhodope Mountains. Their total area is 1,568 sq. km. and there are 5 towns and 31 villages situated there, including high in the mountains. The infrastructure is relatively good and ensures access to all settlements. The local roads are being renovated as per the adopted municipal pans. There is Internet in place, which ensures good conditions for modern communications. The region is mountainous and includes reserves, protected territories and National Parks. The area is rich in water resources: rivers, high-mountain lakes, waterfalls (the most famous one being the Sv. Nikola Waterfall – Municipality of Bansko). There are also many thermal springs, the majority of them being unique. The Banya village, located along the Razlog – Yakoruda road, is one of the richest settlements in Bulgaria in terms of thermal water – 72 springs have been found with various temperature and composition. Along the course of the Dobrinishka River, there is the mineral water pool built in ancient times and known as Rimskoto Banche (the Roman Bath). There are two thermal water deposits in the Municipality of Belitsa – one of them with low-mineralised water suitable for daily use and the other – with water suitable for treating locomotor problems. The natural rock formations – wonders of nature, which are the subject of various legends, are also numerous and varied.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of Waste Network for Sustainable Solid Waste Management Planning and Promotion of Integrated Decision Tools in the Balkan Region
    Establishment of Waste Network for Sustainable Solid Waste Management Planning and Promotion of Integrated Decision Tools in the Balkan Region (BALKWASTE) LIFE07/ENV/RO/686 Action 3: Evaluation of waste infrastructure in the Bulgarian target region – Razlog Municipality Sofia, December 2010 2nd Revision Main authors: Lucia Ilieva, Margarita Hristova, Iskra Kuncheva, Velika Chimeva (CSDCS) Contributors: Kyriakos Elaiopoulos, Tudor Dau (EFCon), George Katsanos, Eleni Feleki, Christos Venetis (Euroconsultants), Fotis Kourmousis, Dimitra Poulia (NTUA) ABREVIATIONS MOEW Ministry of Environment and Water MSW Municipal Solid waste NSI National Statistical Institute RIOSW Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Water PUDOS Programme for Actions related to environment OP Operational programme MW Municipal waste WM Waste management TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 3 1. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 5 1.1. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS 6 1.2. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8 1.3. TOURISM 9 1.4. TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE 10 2. DETAILED DATA FOR MUNICIPALITIES INCLUDED IN THE WM PROJECT 13 2.1. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS 13 2.2. ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 17 3. WASTE MANAGEMENT STAKEHOLDERS 20 4. WASTE QUANTITIES 21 5. WASTE COLLECTION 24 6. SEPARATION AT SOURCE SCHEMES 26 7. WASTE TREATMENT 29 8. COSTS 35 9. CONCLUSIONS 37 10. REFERENCES 44 11. ANNEX I – RAZLOG REGIONAL LANDFILL PROJECT 46 CSDCS - Club “Sustainable Development of Civil Society” 2 Executive Summary The report provides a detailed picture of the waste infrastructure in the target region of Razlog and the proposed construction of regional landfill. This landfill will be a modern in regard to technology installation corresponding to the undertaken engagements of the country towards the European community. The common vision is for considerable improvement and preservation of the environment especially in the situation of fast developing tourism and sport in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Reactive Monitoring Mission to Pirin National Park, Bulgaria, 10Th To
    World Heritage 36 COM Patrimoine mondial Distribution limited / limitée Paris, 15 June / 15 Juin 2012 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Thirty-sixth session / Trente-sixième session Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation / Saint Pétersbourg, Fédération de Russie 24 June – 6 July 2012 / 24 juin – 6 juillet 2012 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger. Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril MISSION REPORT / RAPPORT DE MISSION Pirin National Park (Bulgaria) (225bis) Parc national de Pirin (Bulgarie) (225bis) 10-14 October 2011 10-14 Octobre 2011 This mission report should be read in conjunction with Document: Ce rapport de mission doit être lu conjointement avec le document suivant: WHC-12/36.COM/7B UNESCO World Heritage Centre - IUCN MISSION REPORT Reactive Monitoring Mission to Pirin National Park, Bulgaria 10th to 14th October 2011 Stig Johansson (IUCN) Kishore Rao (UNESCO World Heritage Centre) November 2011 All photographs © Stig Johansson. 1 Acknowledgements The mission team would like to thank the Government of Bulgaria for its kind invitation, hospitality and assistance throughout the duration of the mission. The team is particularly grateful for the oppor- tunity to discuss with the Minister of Environment and Water, Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study Summary
    INTERREG IVC EPTA PROJECT FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR TRANSFER OF GOOD PRACTICES: BYCICLE SHARING SYSTEM CARPOOLING SYSTEM ASSIGNOR: MUNICIPALITY OF RAZLOG EXECUTOR: GEOCONSULT LTD. MARCH 2013 1 EPTA PROJECT – FEASABILITY STUDY BY Contents: 1. Introduction – study activities 2. Territorial and socio-demographic analysis 2.1. Territorial analysis 2.2. Socio-demographic analysis 2.3. Local population mobility 3. Shared bicycle system 3.1. Research of foreign experience 3.2. Territorial research. Bicycle potential of the municipality. 3.3. Research of the existing inter-settlement and intra-city bicycle routes and interconnectivity between bicycles and other modes of transport 3.4. Attitude survey of the local population on the shared bicycle system. Potential partners. 3.5. Legislation review 3.6. Economic feasibility, funding opportunities and project management. 3.7. Feasibility study conclusions. Road map. 4. Carpooling system 4.1. Nature of carpooling 4.2. Study of best foreign practices 4.3. Travel and mobility needs of the local population. Carpooling in Razlog. 4.4. Attitudes towards carpooling system 4.5. Legislation and regulations review 4.6. Carpooling system creation 4.7. Economic viability, budget, funding opportunities and system management 4.8. Conclusion 5. Public transport authority 5.1. General situation 5.2. Public active transport management body 5.3. Benefits of the active transport management NGO 6. Bibliography and appendixes 6.1. Information 6.2. List of appendixes 2 EPTA PROJECT – FEASABILITY STUDY BY Study team MANAGER: Angel Yanakiev, dipl. eng. PROJECT LEADER : Dr. Alexander Yanakiev TEAM MEMBERS: • Hristo Nikolov – urban planning • Dimitar Trifonov – urban planning • Nevena Germanova – sociology • Ilina Naidenova – architect • Bozidar Popov, dipl.eng.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Longhorn Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Entomological Collections in Bulgaria
    НАУКА ЗА ГОРАТА, КН. 1, 2020 FOREST SCIENCE, No 1, 2020 NEw RECORDS OF LONGHORN BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) IN ENTOMOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS IN BULGARIA Georgi Georgiev Forest research institute, Bulgarian academy of sciences Abstract: during the period 2008-2014, unpublished longhorn beetles in the entomo- logical collections of the Forest research institute, institute of Biodiversity and ecosystem research and national museum of natural history in sofia were studied. as a result, 86 taxa belonging to five subfamilies were identified: Prioninae (2 species), lepturinae (29 species and subspecies), spondylidinae (7 species and subspecies), cerambycinae (25 species and subspecies) and lamiinae (23 species and subspecies). in this study, new localities of rare taxa (Aegomorphus krueperi, Cortodera holosericea holosericea, Phymatodes lividus, Pilemia tigrina, Pogonocherus hispidus, Tetrops starkii starkii) were established in Bulgaria. these new records enlarge our knowledge of regional distribution of cerambycids in the country. Key words: cerambycidae, entomological collections, rare species, Bulgaria INTRODUCTION the longhorn beetles (coleoptera: cerambycidae) are relatively well studied in Bulgaria. the results of previous investigations are summarized in two monographs (angelov, 1995; migliaccio et al., 2007), two papers on host plants of xylophagous species (doychev et al., 2017, 2018) and several articles on cerambycid diversity in different mountains of the country (georgiev, 2011; georgiev et al., 2002, 2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2006, 2013, 2018; georgiev, stojanova, 2003; georgiev, hubenov, 2006; migliaccio et al., 2004; rapuzzi, georgiev, 2007, etc.). it must be noted, however, that there is insufficient knowledge about regional distribution of the species. the present work reports information about unpublished records of longhorn beetles in three entomological collections in Bulgaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Amcham Body88v4.Qxd
    10 EXTRA PAGES ON REAL ESTATE issue 88 april 2008 AmAm ChamCham Interview:Interview: BoykoBoyko Borisov,Borisov, SofiaSofia MayorMayor AlexAlex Nestor,Nestor, DundeeDundee PreciousPrecious MetalsMetals Analysis:Analysis: TheThe RealReal EstateEstate OverviewOverview -- Business,Business, Residential,Residential, Recreation,Recreation, GolfGolf AlbaniaAlbania && CroatiaCroatia toto JoinJoin NATONATO MeetMeet thethe newnew members:members: EmporikiEmporiki BankBank Bulgaria,Bulgaria, KimimpexKimimpex TradeTrade && Leasing,Leasing, MBLMBL Ltd.,Ltd., VMVM FinanceFinance GroupGroup UnitedUnited BulgarianBulgarian BankBank AmChamAmCham VolunteersVolunteers toto MakeMake ParksParks inin SofiaSofia NicerNicer American Chamber of Commerce in Bulgaria Business Park Sofia, Mladost 4 Area, Building 2, Floor 6, 1766 Sofia Tel.: (359 2) 9742 743 Fax: (359 2) 9742 741 homepage: www.amcham.bg e-mail: [email protected] editorial Dear Reader, Let me ask you a very simple question: "Do you happen to have a car?" If your answer is 'yes,' keep on reading. If it is 'not,' skip the next paragraph. So, you have an automobile, which is very likely to be used at least once a week in the Sofia downtown, where most of the government institutions, tax offices, banks, and other important businesses are located. Don't you think that getting around the downtown area has been becoming increasingly difficult? Sofia Mayor Boyko Borissov seems to agree with you. He gave us an inter- view (see Page 24), in which he explains that once the construction of Sofia Metropolitan is completed, the access to the city center will be regulated by a fee. But how long will the metro construction last? Four, five, or more years? By then, our nerves will be so frayed that most of us will have left Sofia for some other, better organized European capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Pirin National Park
    WHC Nomination Documentation File name: 225.pdf UNESCO Region EUROPE SITE NAME ("TITLE") Pirin National Park DATE OF INSCRIPTION ("SUBJECT") 9/12/1983 STATE PARTY ("AUTHOR") BULGARIA CRITERIA ("KEY WORDS") N (i)(ii)(iii) DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: The Committee mad no statement. BRIEF DESCRIPTION: The park has a limestone Balkan landscape, with its lakes, waterfalls, caves and pine forests, and a rich flora containing many endemic plant species. The rugged mountains, with around seventy glacial lakes scattered throughout them, are a relic of the ancient glacial days of Europe. 1.b. State, province or region: County of Blagoevgrad 1.d Exact location: South West Bulgaria, Pirin Mountain Pirin National Park Republic of Bulgaria Nomination for changes in the boundaries of Pirin National Park as Natural World Heritage Property 2009 Ministry of Environment and Water Pirin National Park Directorate Table of content EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY 10 2. DESCRIPTION 16 3. JUSTIFICATION FOR INSCRIPTION 27 Criterion VII 27 Criterion IX 28 Criterion X 30 4. STATE OF CONSERVATION AND FACTORS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY 35 5. PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE PROPERTY 43 6. MONITORING 58 7. DOCUMENTATION 61 8. CONTACT INFORMATION 64 9. SIGNATURE ON BEHALF OF THE STATE PARTY 66 Pirin WHS Nomination 2009 2 Acronyms CC Consultative Council EEA Environmental Executive Agency GIS Geographic Information System IBA Important Bird Area IPA Important Plant Area MAB UNESCO Man and Biosphere Programme MoEW Ministry of Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgarianproperties.Com/25628
    Offer: Fully furnished and equipped holiday apartment in Razlog Ref. No.: Redenka Lodge 15 (303) URL address of the offer: https://www.bulgarianproperties.com/25628 Fully furnished and equipped holiday apartment Price € 51 800 Location: Razlog , Bansko For sale Type of property: Large apartment Area features : In the countryside. , In ski resort, In mountain, Near a golf course, In vacation place, In fishing area, In hunting area, Near town, Near balneological resort Area: 103.65 m2 Garden: no Bedrooms: 3 Floor: 2 Heating system: Central heating Furnishing: Fully furnished Condition: Excellent Authorised agency Responsible agent Hristo Nestorov Bansko Mobile: +359 882 817 500 Phone: +359 2 425 68 62 Address: 14, Pirin Str. Vazrazhdane Sq, Bansko 2770 Skype: bulgarianproperties.bg Lovely 3-bedroom apartment in a modern gated ski complex near Bansko Located in Redenka Lodge Complex, this apartment is part of Redenka Holiday Club near the ski resort of Bansko and the town of Razlog. The apartment is set on the second floor and has southern disposition of the premises, as well as a lovely mountain view. The living area of the apartment spreads over 103.65 sq.m of area, where the pure usable area is 85.55 sq.m. It Page 1 Offer: Fully furnished and equipped holiday apartment in Razlog Ref. No.: Redenka Lodge 15 (303) URL address of the offer: https://www.bulgarianproperties.com/25628 comprises of a living room with a fireplace and an open-plan kitchen and dining zone, plus an access to a balcony. Further, there are three bedrooms, one with access to a terrace, and a bathroom/wc.
    [Show full text]
  • White Elephants in the Green Mountains
    White Elephants in the Green Mountains Ski developments in Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia and Ukraine WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme 2008 Table of contents Executive summary 2 Introduction – purpose and methodology 3 Europe’s treasure chest (boxed text) 5 Report Boom in ski developments 6 Public sector support 6 7 Ski in Romania (boxed text) In the public interest? 8 8 • Climate change 9 • Lessons from the Alps (boxed text) 10 • Artificial snow and water 10 • Biodiversity and nature values Conclusions and recommendations 13 Case studies • Pirin National Park, Bulgaria 16 • Vitosha Nature Park, Bulgaria 17 • Rila National Park, Bulgaria 19 • High Tatras National Park, Slovakia 21 • Bukovel, Ukraine 23 Annex I: List of problematic ski areas 24 Photo front cover: Rila National Park, Bulgaria © Konstantin Ivanov (c) 2008, WWF-International Danube-Carpathian Programme Synthesis report: Andreas Beckmann with support from Michael Easter and Jennifer Matthews on the basis of desk based research and country reports for Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia and Ukraine. We would especially like to thank www.forthenature.org for information and use of photos. This report and other related information and materials are available on the Internet at: http://www.panda.org/dcpo Page 2/27 Executive summary “White elephant” : something that has cost a lot of money but has no useful purpose (Cambridge dictionary). A white elephant is a valuable possession which the owner cannot dispose of, but whose cost exceeds its supposed usefulness. (Wikipedia) There is an ongoing boom in construction of new and expansion of existing facilities for downhill skiing across many parts of Central and Southeastern Europe, especially in Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia and Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • БАНСКО | BANSKO Център, Джакузи, 24 Часова Охрана, Ски Гардероб, Playground in Garden
    Знаете ли, че при покупка на имот от Форос, Вие Do you know that by purchasing a property trough Foros Комплекси .................................. 1-3 автоматично получавате сертификат you automatically win a 10% commission discount Completed complexes за 10% отстъпка от комисионната при следващи покупки. certificate for any consequent purchases. Новопостроенные комплексы И това не е всичко! And that is not all! Вашите роднини и приятели също могат да се възползват Your friends and relatives can also avail of this once-off Комплекси в строеж от тази отстъпка, използвайки Вашия сертификат! Off-plan complexes commission discount using your certificate! Комплексы в процессе Не правете просто покупка! Don't just buy! строительства: Направете услуга. Do a favour. Банско, Bansko, Банско ................... 4,5 Голф, Golf, гольф............................... 5,6 СПА, SPA, СПА ................................. 6,7 Разлог, Razlog town, в г. РАЗЛОГ ..... 8 Благоевград, Blagoevgrad city, в г. БЛАГОЕВГРАД ............................ 8 B A N S K O Апартаменти .......................... 9,10 Apartments Квартиры Вили ........................................... 10,11 Банско Completed villas Новые дачи дачи Вили в строеж ........................ 12,13 Off-plan villas Дачи в процессе строительства Селски къщи ............................... 13 Rural houses Сельские дома Земя в Банско ............................ 14 Land in Bansko Земля в Банско Земя до голф игрище ................ 14 Golf land Земля гольф Земя в спа курорти ................. 15 Spa resorts land Земля в спа курортах Земя в регулация ....................... 15 Офис продажби и наеми Sales and rentals office Regulated land Земельные участки в регуляции Банско 2770, ул. Пирин 6 Bansko 2770, 6 Pirin St, Bansko Хотели ...................................... 16,17 Тел./Факс: 0749 88542 Tel/Fax: +359 749 88542 Hotels Гостиницы Мобилен: 0896 698 721 Мobile: +359 896 698 721 Наеми .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pirin National Park
    EUROPE / NORTH AMERICA PIRIN NATIONAL PARK BULGARIA WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION PIRIN NATIONAL PARK (BULGARIA) - ID Nº 225 bis rev Background note: Pirin National Park, was inscribed on the World Heritage List in 1983 under criteria (vii), (viii) and (ix), at that time numbered natural criteria (i), (ii) and (iii). The original IUCN evaluation noted the mountain scenery, glacial geomorphology, and the continuing evolution of the fl ora, as evidenced by a number of endemic and relict species, as key features of the Outstanding Universal Value of the property. The proposed extension of Pirin National Park has been nominated under criteria (vii), (ix) and (x). In line with previous recommendations by the World Heritage Committee and IUCN, the State Party submitted both a proposal for the extension of the existing property in 2006, in which it also proposed to exclude the Bansko and Dobrinishte tourism zones from the property and to include them in a new buffer zone. This proposal was incomplete and therefore not evaluated by IUCN. A revised proposal submitted in 2007 was evaluated by IUCN but withdrawn by the State Party before its examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 32nd session of the (Quebec City, Canada, 2008). A further revised proposal, in which the State Party again proposes to exclude the Bansko and Dobrinishte tourism zones from the property and to include them in a new buffer zone, was submitted in 2009 and is the subject of this evaluation. Since 2002, the property has been the subject of repeated concern by the World Heritage Committee regarding threats to the Outstanding Universal Value of the property from the development of ski facilities in the Bansko and Dobrinishte tourism zones (see Decisions 26COM 21B.2, 27COM 7B.15, 28COM 15B.21, 29COM 7B.23, 31COM 7B.27 and 33COM 7B.21).
    [Show full text]