DOCSLIB.ORG

This Document Consists of 10 Printed Pages. [Turn Over Cambridge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Document Consists of 10 Printed Pages. [Turn Over Cambridge Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge Ordinary Level HISTORY (MAURITIUS AND MODERN WORLD AFFAIRS) 2162/01 Paper 1 Mauritius and Modern World Affairs October/November 2018 MARK SCHEME Maximum Mark: 80 Published This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers. Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes. Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2018 series for most Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level components. This document consists of 10 printed pages. © UCLES 2018 [Turn over 2162/01 Cambridge O Level – Mark Scheme October/November PUBLISHED 2018 Generic Marking Principles These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1: Marks must be awarded in line with: • the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question • the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question • the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 2: Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions). GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 3: Marks must be awarded positively: • marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate • marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do • marks are not deducted for errors • marks are not deducted for omissions • answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 4: Rules must be applied consistently e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 5: Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen). GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 6: Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind. © UCLES 2018 Page 2 of 10 2162/01 Cambridge O Level – Mark Scheme October/November PUBLISHED 2018 Section A: International Relations and Development Question Answer Marks 1 Describe the main territorial terms of the Treaty of Versailles. Explain 20 why Wilson, Clemenceau and Lloyd George had differing views on how Germany should be treated in the peace settlement. Territorial terms (10 marks). Eupen-Malmedy to Belgium North Schleswig to Denmark Polish Corridor; Upper Silesia and Posen to Poland Memel to Lithuania Saar to League Alsace-Lorraine to France Togoland, Cameroons, German West Africa and German South-West Africa lost by Germany. Differing views (10 marks). Largely a result of different experiences. USA late entry wanting to avoid future war. Clemenceau looking for revenge and future security. Lloyd-George keen to maintain trade with Germany, but had made promises to electorate. Question Answer Marks 2 Describe how the League of Nations was organised. Explain why the 20 League failed to prevent the Italian invasion of Abyssinia in 1935. Organisation (10 marks). Assembly, Council, Secretariat, the ILO, Commissions allow membership, voting and lack of army Abyssinia (10 marks). Britain and France dominating League and wanted to maintain friendship of Mussolini versus Hitler. Hoare-Laval Pact, lack of care for Abyssinia, ineffective sanctions, keep Suez Canal open. © UCLES 2018 Page 3 of 10 2162/01 Cambridge O Level – Mark Scheme October/November PUBLISHED 2018 Question Answer Marks 3 Describe the main events of the German invasion of the Soviet Union 20 (Operation Barbarossa) in 1941. Explain why Germany lost the Second World War. Invasion (10 marks). June 1941, invasion delayed to help Mussolini in Greece, three-pronged attack, rapid advance to Moscow, Leningrad and Kiev, winter arrives and advance stops. Russian counter offensive. Battle of Stalingrad. German surrender Feb 1943. Retreat. Reasons for defeat: (10 marks). Failure to win Battle of Britain, Allies better resourced (especially after entry of USA), consequences of Barbarossa. Allied air supremacy and bombing 1944/45. Question Answer Marks 4 Describe the main events of the U2 spy-plane incident in 1960. Explain 20 why did Khrushchev ordered the building of the Berlin Wall in 1961. U2 (10 marks) 1 May 1960, just before Paris summit, USA says weather plane, Soviets show Gary Powers, Eisenhower refuses to apologise, Paris summit ruined, Khrushchev walks out. Eisenhower later owns up, but says all part of necessary measure and intends to continue. Why Wall built (10 marks). Reward general Cold War rivalry and division of Germany/Berlin, plus immediate events such as US embarrassment at Bay of Pigs, failure to reach agreement about Berlin at summits, refugee crisis and need to protect Soviet image. © UCLES 2018 Page 4 of 10 2162/01 Cambridge O Level – Mark Scheme October/November PUBLISHED 2018 Section B: History of Mauritius 1 Ile de France 1715 to 1810 Question Answer Marks 5 Describe the main events in the Ile de France from the arrival d’Arsel in 20 1715 to the appointment of Labourdonnais as Governor in 1734. Explain why Labourdonnais has been called ‘the greatest of all governors of the islands’. Main Events (10 marks D’Arsel first arrival. But no development. Others follow from 1721, Conseil Superieur, role of Cossigny, etc. Labourdonnais (10 marks) Developed Port Louis, promoted French interests in Indian Ocean, introduced new crops, established order. Responsible for continuation of Ile de France as French dependency. Question Answer Marks 6 Describe the problems faced by the French in governing the Ile de 20 France in the period up to 1756. Explain why the Seven Years’ War (1756 to 1763) was important in the history of Mauritius. Problems (10 marks). Quick succession of governors, quarrels, war of Austrian Succession, administrative issues, the issue of slavery. 7 Year’s War (10 marks). Immediate problems such as expedition based on the island, Magon resigns, situation made worse by cyclone, showed Ile de France incapable of provisioning major fleet; major disaster for French East India Company (FEIC) and impact on islanders was increase in privateering. FEIC sells island to French Crown so royal administration from 1767. © UCLES 2018 Page 5 of 10 2162/01 Cambridge O Level – Mark Scheme October/November PUBLISHED 2018 Question Answer Marks 7 Describe the improvements made to Port Louis by Pierre Poivre. 20 Explain why slavery was important to the Ile de France in the period up to 1789. Port Louis (10 marks). Improved defences, accommodation, roads, improved moral standards Slavery (10 marks). Slaves arrive in large numbers from 1720 and by mid-18th century 90% of island population were slaves. Suggestion that treated better than slaves elsewhere, but laws and office of Syndic probably not effective. Significant law and order problem of runaways. Played an important role in rock clearance to allow cultivation, worked in sugar industry, mills, agriculture in general, domestic slaves and as ‘royal’ slaves. Also had cultural impact. Question Answer Marks 8 Describe how the Ile de France prospered in the years 1803 to 1810. 20 Explain why the British were able to take control of the island in 1810. Prosperity (10 marks). Admin changes, reconstruction, improvements to harbour, law, education, especially trade and commerce British take control French naval inferiority, early British capture of Reunion, Decaen had offended locals, troops outnumbered. Decaen decides not to fight. offer of generous terms for surrender. Faced with overwhelming military force and offered these generous terms, Decaen surrendered and so saved many lives. © UCLES 2018 Page 6 of 10 2162/01 Cambridge O Level – Mark Scheme October/November PUBLISHED 2018 2 British Mauritius from 1810 to 1922 Question Answer Marks 9 Describe the reaction of the Mauritian planters to the appointment of 20 John Jeremie as procureur général in 1832. Explain why it proved difficult to abolish slavery in Mauritius. Appointment of Jeremie (10 marks). Opposed, tried to stop him landing, Colonial Committee organise a general strike, Jeremie then dismissed. Jeremie returns and carries out arrests, public outcry. Governor fails to support and Jeremie dismissed. Abolition of slavery (10 marks). Initial British desire to maintain status quo, importance to economy, plus recent influx of slaves under British, arguments over compensation, role of d’Epinay. In Mauritius the Abolition of Slavery Act came into force in February 1835 – over a year later than elsewhere in the British Empire. Question Answer Marks 10 Describe how labour was provided to work in the sugar industry in the 20 period c.1820 to c.1865. Explain why these years saw a rapid development in the industry. Provision of labour (10 marks). The use of indentured labour had begun before the emancipation of the slaves. Workers entered into a contract that included their passage – usually from India – accommodation and payment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women, Slavery, and British Imperial Interventions in Mauritius, 1810–1845
    Women, Slavery, and British Imperial Interventions in Mauritius, 1810–1845 Tyler Yank Department of History and Classical Studies Faculty of Arts McGill University, Montréal October 2019 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Tyler Yank 2019 ` Table of Contents ! Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Résumé ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Figures ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 10 History & Historiography ............................................................................................................. 15 Definitions ..................................................................................................................................... 21 Scope of Study .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1: Manumission and Freedom in Early British Mauritius, 1811–1839
    4 ‘Fit for Freedom’1: Manumission and Freedom in Early British Mauritius, 1811–1839 Satyendra Peerthum …it was often possible for the slave [and apprentice], by great perseverance and labour to purchase his own freedom and, this being accomplished the freedom of those dear to him.2 The slaves, however, were not prepared to wait for freedom to come to them as a dispensation from above….They were fully impressed with the belief that they were entitled to their freedom and that the cause they had embraced was just and in vindication of their own rights.3 Introduction The objective of this chapter is to explore the experience of slaves during the Slave Amelioration Period and of apprentices during the Apprenticeship era in Mauritius. It focuses on slaves’ and apprentices’ attempts to free themselves through manumission, their motives and the methods used to achieve this between 1829 and 1839. The aim is to show that slaves did not wait for the official abolition of slavery by the British government to attempt to change their servile status and instead used innovative attempts to improve their lives. As stated by Saunders for South Africa: Historians of slavery…may lay too great a stress on the great day of freedom…or the more important day four years later. Freedom had come to many individuals long before either of those dates … Individually and collectively they moved from effective slavery to ‘freedom’ before emancipation day dawned for the slaves.4 The slaves’ and apprentices’ attempts at manumission were interpreted in a number of ways by colonial officials and local colonists, and thus this chapter will 70 Transition from Slavery in Zanzibar and Mauritius also seek to extract all available information from sources to try to understand the world view of the slaves as this is rarely seen or stated explicitly in the sources.
    [Show full text]
  • 2549-1296 Volume 3, Number 1, January 2019 Unilateral Claim Ov
    Padjadjaran Journal of International Law ISSN: 2549-2152, EISSN: 2549-1296 Volume 3, Number 1, January 2019 Unilateral Claim over Chagos Archipelago as British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) by United Kingdom Based on International Law Jerina Novita Elpasari Abstract In 1965, United Kingdom (UK) made a unilateral claim over the Chagos Archipelago as British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) based on the BIOT Order of 1965 and Statutory Instrument of 1965 No. 1020. Due to this unilateral act, the Chagos Archipelago no longer parts of Mauritius. Problem arising from Britain's unilateral claim to the territory was further aggravated by the United Kingdom’s act in enforcing population transfer towards all Chagos islanders (Chagossians) out of the territory without adequate compensations and resettlement. This research aims to analyze the legality of unilateral claims over the Chagos archipelago as a BIOT and the enforced transfer of Chagossians from their original residential place by the United Kingdom. It argues that under international law, Chagos Archipelago is recognized as an area that should remain integrated within the territory of Mauritius. It further argues that the UK has violated international law by committing enforced population transfer. Keywords: BIOT, Enforced Population Transfer, Territory, The Chagos Archipelago, Unilateral Act. Klaim Sepihak Inggris terhadap Kepulauan Chagos sebagai British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional Abstrak Pada tahun 1965, Inggris melakukan klaim sepihak atas wilayah Kepulauan Chagos sebagai British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) berdasarkan British Indian Ocean Territory Order of 1965 dan Statutory Instrument of 1965 No. 1020. Kepulauan Chagos merupakan bagian dari Mauritius pada saat Mauritius berada dibawah penjajahan Inggris.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief After JO Comments 12 September 2011
    THE GLOBAL FORUM ON TRANSPARENCY AND EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION FOR TAX PURPOSES THE GLOBAL FORUM ON TRANSPARENCY AND EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION FOR TAX PURPOSES INFORMATION BRIEF 12 September 2011 For more information please contact: Jeffrey Owens, OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Director (jeffrey.HU [email protected])UH or Pascal Saint-Amans, Global Forum Secretariat (pascal.saintHU [email protected])UH 12 September 2011 THE GLOBAL FORUM ON TRANSPARENCY AND EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION FOR TAX PURPOSES BREAKING NEWS! JURISDICTIONS MOVE TOWARDS FULL TAX TRANSPARENCY 1. Furthering efforts to fight against international tax evasion and bank secrecy, members of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes have issued 12 new peer review reports. 2. Reports on Andorra, Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Austria, Bahrain, the Virgin Islands (British), Curaçao, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Saint Kitts and Nevis and the Turks and Caicos Islands focus on their legal frameworks which allow for transparency and exchange of tax information. The review report on the United Kingdom considers in addition the exchange of information in practice. 3. In addition, two supplementary reports for Belgium and the Cayman Islands show that they are swiftly amending their domestic legislation to address recommendations made by the Global Forum in previous reviews. 4. The reports describe each jurisdiction’s rules for ensuring that information is available to the tax authorities, how it can be accessed by authorities and the mechanisms in place to exchange information with foreign tax authorities. They also identify deficiencies and make recommendations on how to improve co-operation in international tax matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Indentured Labour in Sub-Saharan Africa (1870-1918): Circulation of Concepts Between Imperial Powers
    Indentured Labour in Sub-Saharan Africa (1870-1918): Circulation of Concepts between Imperial Powers ULRIKE LINDNER INTRODUCTION When German mining companies in the German colony of South West Africa pressed their government to recruit Chinese or Indian indentured workers for their enterprises in 1912, a discussion ensued in neighbouring South Africa. In the Transvaal, at that time already part of the Union of South Africa, tens of thousands of Chinese had been imported to work in the mines at the Witwatersrand between 1904 and 1907 (Richardson 1984). The advice of a Transvaal Newspaper to the German colonial minister was to keep German South West Africa as a “white colony” and to refrain from importing Asian coolies as it would endanger the racial order.1 But German South West Africa proceeded with its endeavour to recruit Indian indentured workers, even though it was not successful, as the Indian government restricted indenture in general. Almost at the same time, in 1910, a British government committee, the Sanderson committee, exploring the future use of Indian contract migrants in colonial environments, mentioned the “invaluable service” of Indian im- migration in many colonies of the British Empire and proposed encouraging the introduction of indentured labourers in the future.2 It also stated that it would be 1 National Archive of Namibia, ZBU 2076 W IV R1, (transcript, German Consulate, Johannesburg to Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg, 16 August 1912). 2 Report of the Committee on Emigration from India to the Crown Colonies and Protectorates
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 = Bibliographie Nationale De Maurice 2004
    NATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MAURITIUS 2004 = BIBLIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE DE MAURICE 2004 NATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MAURITIUS 2004 BIBLIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE DE MAURICE 2004 EDITED BY Yves Chan Kam Lon NATIONAL LIBRARY Republic of Mauritius Port-Louis 2007 1 NATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MAURITIUS 2004 = BIBLIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE DE MAURICE 2004 Published by National Library, c2007 1st & 2nd Floors, Fon Sing Building, 12, Edith Cavell Street, Port-Louis Copyright 2007 National Library All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any terms, without written permission from the publisher National Library (Republic of Mauritius) Cataloguing-in-Publication Data National bibliography of Mauritius 2004 = Bibliographie nationale de Maurice 2004 / edited by Yves Chan Kam Lon .– Port-Louis : National Library, c2007. p. ; cm Includes indexes ISBN 1. Bibliography, National (Mauritius) 2. National libraries (Mauritius) I. Chan Kam Lon, Yves (ed.) 015'.6982 dc-22 ISBN 2 NATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MAURITIUS 2004 = BIBLIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE DE MAURICE 2004 Contents Acknowledgements Introduction 000 – 099 : Generalities 100 – 199 : Philosophy & psychology 200 – 299 : Religion 300 – 399 : Social sciences 400 – 499 : Language 500 – 599 : Science 600 – 699 : Technology 700 – 799 : Arts & recreation 800 – 899 : Literature 900 – 999 : History & geography List of Newspapers Author Index Title Index Subject Index 3 NATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MAURITIUS 2004 = BIBLIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE DE MAURICE 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • AGOA – an Instrument of the US Ruling Class
    DIEGO GARCIA IN TIMES OF GLOBALISATION A Collection of Essays written by LALIT Published, typeset and printed by Ledikasyon Pu Travayer October 2002 Note: This may not be the final version that was printed in October 2002 Konteni Prefas ...........................................................................................................9 U.S Hegemony and Unilateralism .......................................................................17 By Ram Seegobin How Diego Garcia was Depopulated & Stolen ..................................................25 By lindsey collen &Ragini Kistnasamy AGOA – an instrument of the US ruling class ...................................................57 By Rajni Lallah Losean Indyin Zonn de Pe ubyin Zonn de Ger? ................................................85 Par Ashok Subron Lalit dimunn ordiner ...........................................................................................109 Par Lindsey Collen ek Rajini Kistnasamy Pozisyon Guvernman ek burzwazi ...................................................................125 Par Alain Ah-Vee Sityasyon Chagosyen Zordi ..............................................................................135 Par Rajini Kistnasamy & Lindsey Collen What exactly is “Mauritius”? .............................................................................147 By Lindsey Collen Diego Garcia under occupation ........................................................................155 By Anonymous Contributors False Assertions about the “Impossibility” of Getting
    [Show full text]
  • Research → Bibliography
    Further Reading Archaeological reports from Mauritius: Summers. G, &, Summers. F 2009. Archaeological potential of the Forbach Estate Camp for Labourers. Final report. Unpub. archaeological report. Historical archaeology of fort Frederik Hendrik, a Dutch East India Company outpost at Mauritius, a report on the 1997 - 2003 excavation seasons. Available from: http://easy.dans.knaw.nl/dms Selected texts on Mauritius: Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund 2003 The Aapravasi Ghat. Past and present. Port Louis: Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund. Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund 2006 Indenture: a brief history of indenture in Mauritius and in the world. Port Louis: Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund. Addison, J. &, Hazareesingh, K. 1984 A New History of Mauritius. Rose-Hill: Editions de l’Océan Indien. Allen, R. B. 1999 Slaves, Freedmen, and Indentured Laborers in Colonial Mauritius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Allen, R. B. 2001 Licentious and unbridled proceedings: the illegal slave trade to Mauritius and the Seychelles during the early nineteenth century. In Journal of African History, Vol. 42, pp. 91-116. Allen, R. B. 2008 The constant demand of the French: the Mascarene slave trade and the worlds of the Indian Ocean and Atlantic during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In Journal of African History, Vol. 49, pp. 43-72. Barker, A. 1996 Slavery and Antislavery in Mauritius, 1810-33. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Boswell, R. 2006 Le Malaise Creole: Ethnic Identity in Mauritius. New Directions in Anthropology. New York: Berghahn Books. Boswell, R. 2008 Challenges to Identifying and Managing Intangible Cultural Heritage in Mauritius, Zanzibar and Seychelles. Codesria. Carter, M. 1995 Servants, Sirdars and Settlers: Indians in Mauritius, 1834-1874.
    [Show full text]
  • See Complete Issue In
    Issue 9, September 2017 ISSN: 2286-7511 EISSN: 2287-0113 Special Issue–The Lessons of History Editorial: The Presence of the Past: Lessons of history for anti-trafficking work Black Suffering for/from Anti-trafficking Advocacy ‘The New Order of Things’: Immobility as protection in the regime of immigration controls ‘Bound Coolies’ and Other Indentured Workers in the Caribbean: Implications for debates about human trafficking and modern slavery Anti-White Slavery Legislation and its Legacies in England Historicising ‘Irregular’ Migration from Senegal to Europe ‘Shock and Awe’: A critique of the Ghana-centric child trafficking discourse ATR #9 First Page---01.pmd 1 1/1/2545, 3:44 review GUEST EDITOR EDITOR JULIA O’CONNELL DAVIDSON BORISLAV GERASIMOV EDITORIAL BOARD RUTVICA ANDRIJASEVIC, University of Bristol, United Kingdom JACQUELINE BHABHA, Harvard School of Public Health, United States URMILA BHOOLA, UN Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences, South Africa XIANG BIAO, Oxford University, United Kingdom LUCIANA CAMPELLO, Panamerican Health Organization, Brazil MIKE DOTTRIDGE, Independent Human Rights Consultant, United Kingdom JOY NGOZI EZEILO, University of Nigeria; Former UN Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children, Nigeria ANNE GALLAGHER, Independent scholar and legal advisor, Australia JOHN GEE, Transient Workers Count Too, Singapore CHANDRE GOULD, Institute for Security Studies, South Africa SUZANNE HOFF, La Strada International, The Netherlands
    [Show full text]
  • The Destiny of the Chagos Islands and Its People
    Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana THE DESTINY OF THE CHAGOS ISLANDS AND ITS PEOPLE Memorandum Concerning Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 Authors: Urša Demšar, Vid Drole, Mohor Fajdiga, Anže Kimovec, Ula Aleksandra Kos, Anže Mediževec, Pia Novak, Gregor Oprčkal, Miha Plahutnik, Ana Samobor, Hana Šerbec. Student Coordinator: Suggestion for the project and feedback: Mohor Fajdiga Dr Veronika Fikfak, University of Cambridge Date: Ljubljana, 3 August 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................... i Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................... iii Table of cases ......................................................................................................................................... iv Table of treaties and other instruments ................................................................................................... v I) Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 II) Factual background ......................................................................................................................... 2 III) Admissibility .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nanar Khamo Genocide, Slavery, and Violence
    Khamo 1 Nanar Khamo Genocide, Slavery, and Violence: Imagining Reparations in the Francophone Indian Ocean, 1715-1835 Slavery is “genocide by substitute,” famously declares the Martinican poet and politician Aimé Césaire in the 1970s, in reference to the historical institution of slavery in the Caribbean (Rothberg 2009). His allegation raises a pressing question that continues to create contention both within and outside the field of genocide studies: how to constitute what is and is not genocide? The unresolved question of slavery as genocide plays a pivotal role in the debate, as indicated by work done by genocide scholars such as Adam Jones, with references to the well- established field of the Atlantic Slave Trade often offered as supporting evidence. This paper demonstrates the need to imagine reparations for historical violence in the less visible field of Indian Ocean slave trade to consider the ways in which the use of the term genocide could foster the conditions ripe for reparations. By focusing on the multicultural, multilingual island-nation of Mauritius as a microcosm of slavery in the South-Western Indian Ocean (even as I acknowledge the particularities of each island system and their discrete histories), I suggest that slavery under the French (1715-1810) could constitute genocide and that British colonial practice (1810-1968) continued to maintain conditions that did not reintegrate slaves into colonial society, upon abolition of slavery in 1835, leading to the current marginalized place of today's descendants of slaves in Mauritius. By considering the possibilities of the term “genocide,” I envision the ways in which reparations could foster new directions forward, particularly for female descendants of slaves who were often double victims of the masculine slave society (Vergès 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Education and National Development in Post-Independent Mauritius in an International Perspective - 1968-1982
    EDUCATION AND NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN POST-INDEPENDENT MAURITIUS IN AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE - 1968-1982 Thesis Presented by: S. JUGGERNAUTH, B.A.(Hons.) English, (C.N.A.A.); Diploma in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (University of London Institute of Education); Diploma in Education (University of London Institute of Education). Master of Arts in Sociology of Education (University of London Institute of Education); For the Course of: Ph.D in Sociology of Education, At: The University of London Institute of Education, For: The Academic Year, 1984-1985. To the loving memory of the living: My beloved wife, Fifi; and my loving son, Kamal. In the living memory of loved ones: My late Parents, my two elder Brothers, and a dear Sister. "The materialist doctrine that men are products of circumstances and upbringing, and that, therefore, changed men are products of other circumstances and changed upbringing, forgets that it is men that change circumstances and the educator himself needs educating." Karl Marx: "Theses on Feuerbach: III", in Karl Marx and Frederick Engles: Selected Works, London: Lawrence & Wishart, (1968 (1888): 28). 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have taken its present form without the close su- pervision and expert guidance of my personal tutor, Dr. Charles Posner who encouraged me to make explicit what was already implicit in my research. To Professor Basil Bernstein of the Sociology of Education Department I am grateful for reading and commenting upon a first draft of this study. To John Hays of the Sociology of Education Department, I am thankful for lending a patient ear to my research problems during the absence of my perso- nal tutor.
    [Show full text]