December-1970-Inoculum.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chorioactidaceae: a New Family in the Pezizales (Ascomycota) with Four Genera
mycological research 112 (2008) 513–527 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres Chorioactidaceae: a new family in the Pezizales (Ascomycota) with four genera Donald H. PFISTER*, Caroline SLATER, Karen HANSENy Harvard University Herbaria – Farlow Herbarium of Cryptogamic Botany, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA article info abstract Article history: Molecular phylogenetic and comparative morphological studies provide evidence for the Received 15 June 2007 recognition of a new family, Chorioactidaceae, in the Pezizales. Four genera are placed in Received in revised form the family: Chorioactis, Desmazierella, Neournula, and Wolfina. Based on parsimony, like- 1 November 2007 lihood, and Bayesian analyses of LSU, SSU, and RPB2 sequence data, Chorioactidaceae repre- Accepted 29 November 2007 sents a sister clade to the Sarcosomataceae, to which some of these taxa were previously Corresponding Editor: referred. Morphologically these genera are similar in pigmentation, excipular construction, H. Thorsten Lumbsch and asci, which mostly have terminal opercula and rounded, sometimes forked, bases without croziers. Ascospores have cyanophilic walls or cyanophilic surface ornamentation Keywords: in the form of ridges or warts. So far as is known the ascospores and the cells of the LSU paraphyses of all species are multinucleate. The six species recognized in these four genera RPB2 all have limited geographical distributions in the northern hemisphere. Sarcoscyphaceae ª 2007 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Sarcosomataceae SSU Introduction indicated a relationship of these taxa to the Sarcosomataceae and discussed the group as the Chorioactis clade. Only six spe- The Pezizales, operculate cup-fungi, have been put on rela- cies are assigned to these genera, most of which are infre- tively stable phylogenetic footing as summarized by Hansen quently collected. -
A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated. -
Listing a Species As a Threatened Or Endangered Species Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Listing a Species as a Threatened or Endangered Species Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, is one of the most far- reaching wildlife conservation laws ever enacted by any nation. Congress, on behalf of the American people, passed the ESA to prevent extinctions facing many species of fish, wildlife and plants. The purpose of the ESA is to conserve endangered and threatened species and the ecosystems on which they depend as key components of America’s heritage. To implement the ESA, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service works in cooperation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), other Federal, State, and local USFWS Susanne Miller, agencies, Tribes, non-governmental Listed in 2008 as threatened because of the decline in sea ice habitat, the polar bear may organizations, and private citizens. spend time on land during fall months, waiting for ice to return. Before a plant or animal species can receive the protection provided by What are the criteria for deciding whether refer to these species as “candidates” the ESA, it must first be added to to add a species to the list? for listing. Through notices of review, the Federal lists of threatened and A species is added to the list when it we seek biological information that will endangered wildlife and plants. The is determined to be an endangered or help us to complete the status reviews List of Endangered and Threatened threatened species because of any of for these candidate species. We publish Wildlife (50 CFR 17.11) and the List the following factors: notices in the Federal Register, a daily of Endangered and Threatened Plants n the present or threatened Federal Government publication. -
Activity 3: Six Kingdoms Brochure
Activity 3: Six Kingdoms Brochure Objective: You will demonstrate your knowledge of the six kingdoms of organisms by gathering information (from your class notes, the internet, and the biology textook) and creating a brochure on the six kingdoms in which scientists classify organisms. Your brochure will be organized as follows: 1. Making the Brochure- the brochure is made of one piece of paper. Fold the paper into thirds. 2. Cover- your cover should have a picture and an appropriate title. Your name should be written in the bottom right corner of the cover. 3. Inside the Brochure- inside your brochure, you should have one section for each of six kingdoms. Use the front and back of the paper. Since there will only be five open sections left in the brochure, you should place both the Eubacteria Kingdom and Archaebacteria Kingdom in the same section. You must include the following information for each of the six kingdoms: • Are the organisms unicellular (one cell) or multicellular (many cells) or both? • Do they have a nucleus in their cells? • Do they make their own food or get it from other organisms? • Other important characteristics • A picture or a diagram of sample organisms (one or a few) The Kingdom Fungi The Kingdom Fungi includes some of the most important organisms, both in terms of their ecological and economic roles. By decomposing dead material, they continue the cycle of nutrients through ecosystems. In addition, most plants could not grow without the fungi, or mycorrhizae, that live in their roots and supply essential nutrients. Other fungi provide numerous drugs (such as penicillin and other antibiotics), foods like mushrooms, truffles and morels, and the bubbles in bread (yeast), champagne, and beer. -
Bibliotheksliste-Aarau-Dezember 2016
Bibliotheksverzeichnis VSVP + Nur im Leesesaal verfügbar, * Dissert. Signatur Autor Titel Jahrgang AKB Myc 1 Ricken Vademecum für Pilzfreunde. 2. Auflage 1920 2 Gramberg Pilze der Heimat 2 Bände 1921 3 Michael Führer für Pilzfreunde, Ausgabe B, 3 Bände 1917 3 b Michael / Schulz Führer für Pilzfreunde. 3 Bände 1927 3 Michael Führer für Pilzfreunde. 3 Bände 1918-1919 4 Dumée Nouvel atlas de poche des champignons. 2 Bände 1921 5 Maublanc Les champignons comestibles et vénéneux. 2 Bände 1926-1927 6 Negri Atlante dei principali funghi comestibili e velenosi 1908 7 Jacottet Les champignons dans la nature 1925 8 Hahn Der Pilzsammler 1903 9 Rolland Atlas des champignons de France, Suisse et Belgique 1910 10 Crawshay The spore ornamentation of the Russulas 1930 11 Cooke Handbook of British fungi. Vol. 1,2. 1871 12/ 1,1 Winter Die Pilze Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz.1. 1884 12/ 1,5 Fischer, E. Die Pilze Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. Abt. 5 1897 13 Migula Kryptogamenflora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz 1913 14 Secretan Mycographie suisse. 3 vol. 1833 15 Bourdot / Galzin Hymenomycètes de France (doppelt) 1927 16 Bigeard / Guillemin Flore des champignons supérieurs de France. 2 Bände. 1913 17 Wuensche Die Pilze. Anleitung zur Kenntnis derselben 1877 18 Lenz Die nützlichen und schädlichen Schwämme 1840 19 Constantin / Dufour Nouvelle flore des champignons de France 1921 20 Ricken Die Blätterpilze Deutschlands und der angr. Länder. 2 Bände 1915 21 Constantin / Dufour Petite flore des champignons comestibles et vénéneux 1895 22 Quélet Les champignons du Jura et des Vosges. P.1-3+Suppl. -
(With (Otidiaceae). Annellospores, The
PERSOONIA Published by the Rijksherbarium, Leiden Volume Part 6, 4, pp. 405-414 (1972) Imperfect states and the taxonomy of the Pezizales J.W. Paden Department of Biology, University of Victoria Victoria, B. C., Canada (With Plates 20-22) Certainly only a relatively few species of the Pezizales have been studied in culture. I that this will efforts in this direction. hope paper stimulatemore A few patterns are emerging from those species that have been cultured and have produced conidia but more information is needed. Botryoblasto- and found in cultures of spores ( Oedocephalum Ostracoderma) are frequently Peziza and Iodophanus (Pezizaceae). Aleurospores are known in Peziza but also in other like known in genera. Botrytis- imperfect states are Trichophaea (Otidiaceae). Sympodulosporous imperfect states are known in several families (Sarcoscyphaceae, Sarcosomataceae, Aleuriaceae, Morchellaceae) embracing both suborders. Conoplea is definitely tied in with Urnula and Plectania, Nodulosporium with Geopyxis, and Costantinella with Morchella. Certain types of conidia are not presently known in the Pezizales. Phialo- and few other have spores, porospores, annellospores, blastospores a types not been reported. The absence of phialospores is of special interest since these are common in the Helotiales. The absence of conidia in certain e. Helvellaceae and Theleboleaceae also be of groups, g. may significance, and would aid in delimiting these taxa. At the species level critical com- of taxonomic and parison imperfect states may help clarify problems supplement other data in distinguishing between closely related species. Plectania and of where such Peziza, perhaps Sarcoscypha are examples genera studies valuable. might prove One of the Pezizales in need of in culture large group desparate study are the few of these have been cultured. -
Tropical Marine Invertebrates CAS BI 569 Phylum Chordata by J
Tropical Marine Invertebrates CAS BI 569 Phylum Chordata by J. R. Finnerty Porifera Ctenophora Cnidaria Deuterostomia Ecdysozoa Lophotrochozoa Chordata Arthropoda Annelida Hemichordata Onychophora Mollusca Echinodermata *Nematoda *Platyhelminthes Acoelomorpha Calcispongia Silicispongiae PROTOSTOMIA Phylum Chordata subPhylum VERTEBRATA subPhylum UROCHORDATA class Ascidaceae—the “sea squirts” class Larvaceae—the larvaceans class Thaliaceae—the salps subPhylum CEPHALOCHORDATA—the “lancelets” Subphylum Subphylum Subphylum Phylum Phylum Vertebrata Urochordata Cephalochordata ECHINODERMATA HEMICHORDATA Phylum CHORDATA Notochord Blastopore -> anus Dorsal hollow nerve cord Radial / equal cleavage Pharyngeal gill slits Coelom forms by enterocoely Endostyle Cross-section through a Chick embryo During Neurulation Subphylum Vertebrata Ordovician Origins—Jawless fishes vertebral column paired appendages post-anal tail Jawed fishes, gnathostomes late Ordovician, early Silurian jaws early Devonian / late Devonian tetrapods / amniotes Permian (299-251) Carboniferous subphylum VERTEBRATA (359-299) gnathostomes (with jaws) 1. Vertebral column Devonian 2. Paired appendages (416-359) 3. Jaws 4. Post anal tail Silurian (444-416) Bony fishes Cartilaginous fishes Paleozoic (543-225) Fishes with jaws & paired fins Ray-finned & Lobe-finned fishes Ordivician Jawless fishes (488-444) Vertebrate origins Jawless fishes phylum CHORDATA Cambrian 1. Dorsal nerve cord (542-488) Non-vert chordates “Cambrian explosion” 2. Notochord Rapid appearance of most 3. Gill slits Animal phyla in fossil record Including Phylum Chordata 4. Endostyle Permian (299-251) 4 3 2 1 1.Pre-mammal-like reptiles 2. Snake-lizard ancestor 3.Crocodile-Bird-Dino ancestor 4. Turtles Carboniferous (359-299) amphibians Early reptiles. Devonian (416-359) Vertebrates invade land “Age of amphibians” Silurian (444-416) Bony fishes AMNIOTES Cartilaginous fishes Paleozoic (543-225) Fishes with jaws & paired fins 1. -
Final Guidance on Awards of Grants to Indian Tribes Under Section 106 of the Clean Water Act
Final Guidance on Awards of Grants to Indian Tribes under Section 106 of the Clean Water Act For Fiscal Years 2007 and Beyond United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Office of Wastewater Management EPA 832-R-06-003 i This page intentionally left blank ii Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................................................. vii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Purpose of this Guidance ........................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Section 106 Tribal Program Background .................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Need for this Guidance .............................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 GPRA, PART, and Environmental Results .................................................................................................................................. 1-4 EPA’s Strategic Plan .................................................................................................................................................................. -
The Mycological Society of San Francisco • Oct. 2014, Vol. 66:02
The Mycological Society of San Francisco • Oct. 2014, vol. 66:02 MycoDigest: October 21 General Meeting Speaker William Bridge Cooke: an avid collector and much more Else Vellinga Chances are that you have never heard of William Bridge Cooke – an Ohio-born mycologist who lived from 1908 till 1991. Yet he played a big role in the history of California mycology. I came across his name over and over again while working on the digitization of the herbarium collections at UC Berkeley. He contributed over 2100 mushroom collections to the herbarium, more than any other collector. Cooke spent the summers of 1936–1941 and again 1946–1947 as custodian of the Shasta Alpine Lodge at the Horse Camp halfway along the route to the peak of Mount Shasta. That meant providing hikers with food, warmth and a shelter, but also ample time to investigate the plants, mushrooms, and other Katrina Blair fungi of the area. And that he did. He made a set of collections of Mount Shasta fungi, “Foraging on the Wild Side: which he offered to the University of California, Berkeley. Even more im- Edible Plants, Mushrooms, and Medicine portantly, Cooke discovered that in spring and early summer, certain mush- rooms fruited beside the melting snow, coining the term “snowbank fungi” to Katrina Blair began studying wild plants describe this phenomenon. Melting snow provides the fungi with the dearly in her teens when she camped out alone for a summer with the intention of eating primarily wild foods. She later wrote “The Wild Edible and Medicinal Plants of the San Juan Mountains” for her senior project at Colorado College. -
Mycological Society of America Newsletter - June
MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF A~I~RI~A JUNE IS62 - VOLa XI11 NO. I MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA NEWSLETTER - JUNE. TB62 VOL. XI11 NC Rdi ted by? Ri.chard ,,. -2n jamin me rreslaenTmsLet-cer. The Annual Meeting-1962, Oregon Stczte Ur:dversi ty. -- - The Annuel ay-1962, Oregon State University. Mycologic ciety Fellowship Election ,, ,-ficers, VI. Myc ologia, VII. Membership. Sustaining Members. IX. Publications. Research Materials. XI. Major Research Projects. XII. Myc ologic a1 Instruction. Assistantships , Fellowships, and Scholarships. XIV. Mycologists Available. Vacancies for Mycologically Trained Personnel. XVI . Recent Appointments and Transf ers . News of General Interest. XVIII. Other News about Members. XIX. Visiting Scientists. Honors, Degrees, Promotions, Invitational Lectures. The F, - F2 Generations. Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Claremont , C a3if ornia I. THE PRESIDENT'S LETTER To the Members of the Mycological Society of America: When thinking back to my days as a graduate student, this is the least likely position I ever imagined I would be inJ It is indeed a real pleasure to serve the Mycological Society to the best of my ability in this highest and most coveted position. It has been most gratifying to see the enthusiastic response among members when asked to serve in various capacities in the Mycological Society during this year. There is real evidence of a tremendous re- vitalization during the past year. It has been through the laborious efforts of Dr. lark ~ogerson,serving as Acting Editor of M~cologia, the past officers, and the cooperative patience of our members that the ~ycoio~icalsociety has really-gone forward. It is a fine tribute to Clark to have the Council and the Editorial Board unanimously request him to serve as Editor. -
Kingdom Fungi
Fungi, Galls, Lichens, Prokaryotes and Protists of Elm Fork Preserve These lists contain the oddballs that do not fit within the plant or animal categories. They include the other three kingdoms aside from Plantae and Animalia, as well as lichens and galls best examined as individual categories. The comments column lists remarks in the following manner: 1Interesting facts and natural history concerning the organism. Place of origin is also listed if it is an alien. 2 Edible, medicinal or other useful qualities of the organism for humans. The potential for poisoning or otherwise injuring humans is also listed here. 3Ecological importance. The organisms interaction with the local ecology. 4Identifying features are noted, especially differences between similar species. 5Date sighted, location and observations such as quantity or stage of development are noted here. Some locations lend themselves to description -- close proximity to a readily identifiable marker, such as a trail juncture or near a numbered tree sign. Other locations that are more difficult to define have been noted using numbers from the location map. Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates are only included for those organisms that are unusual or rare and are likely to be observed again in the same place. 6 Synonyms; outdated or recently changed scientific names are inserted here. 7 Control measures. The date, method and reason for any selective elimination. 8 Intentional Introductions. The date, source and reason for any introductions. 9 Identification references. Species identifications were made by the author unless otherwise noted. Identifications were verified using the reference material cited. 10Accession made. A notation is made if the organism was photographed, collected for pressing or a spore print was obtained. -
Mount Shasta Annotated Bibliography Chapter 31
Mount Shasta Annotated Bibliography Chapter 31 Science: Botany Mt. Shasta stands as if an island in the sky of northern California. The higher reaches of the mountain are a unique environment. Any such isolated habitat such as the heights of Mt. Shasta holds the promise of containing plants and trees which perhaps have evolved in some way independently of outside influences. From the times of earliest exploration on, botanists have desired to explore Mt. Shasta to see what grows upon its slopes. Comparisons with the flora of other peaks and alpine regions of the West helps give botanists insights into the geographic distribution and evolution of the plant kingdom. The Scotsman William Brackenridge, who discovered the California Pitcher Plant (Darlingtonia californica) near the base of Castle Crags in 1841, was the first botanist to cross over the slopes of Mt. Shasta (see Section 9. Early Exploration: American Government Expeditions, 1841-1860). During the latter half of the 19th Century some of the most famous botanists of the time came to Mt. Shasta. Scottish botanist John Jeffrey discovered the Jeffrey Pine in the Shasta Valley, possibly on northern slope of Mt. Shasta, in 1852. The famed American botanist Asa Gray, and English botanist Joseph Dalton Hooker, botanized on Mt. Shasta with John Muir in 1877 (see Section 21. Literature: John Muir). John Gill Lemmon, who climbed to the summit of Shasta in 1879, later scientifically named the specific variety of Red Fir trees he found upon the mountain's slopes as the Shasta Red Fir (see also Section 11. Mountaineering 19th Century).