Migration Trends 2004–2006 Söderköping Process Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Migration Trends 2004–2006 Söderköping Process Countries MIGRATION TRENDS 2004–2006 SÖDERKÖPING PROCESS COUNTRIES Irina Pribytkova, professor Juris Gromovs, mag.iur., dr.cand.iur This project is funded by This project is implemented Swedish Migration Board The International the European Union by the United Nations High is a project partner Organization for Migration Commissioner for Refugees is a project partner Contact: Cross-Border Cooperation Process Secretariat 32-A Sichnevoho Povstannya St., Kyiv, 01015, Ukraine Tel: +380 44 254 55346 / 47 Fax: +380 44 288 9850 Email: [email protected] www.soderkoping.org.ua Th is paper was written by Dr. Irina Pribytkova and Juris Gromovs with the assistance of Ilmars Mezs, Programme offi cer, International Organization for Migration. Th is publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Commission. It pres- ents the views of its authors and in no way constitutes any obligation or expresses the offi cial position or views of the European Commission, IOM, UNHCR, or SMB. Th is paper may be freely quoted, cited and copied for academic, educational or other non-com- mercial purposes without prior permission from European Commission, IOM, UNHCR and SMB, provided that the source is acknowledged. Th e paper is available online at www.soderkoping.org.ua © European Commission, 2007 Contents Introduction 4 Regular and Irregular Migration in Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova, 2004–2006 5 Introduction 5 1. Ukraine 7 1.1. Migration process management 7 1.2. Regular migration 9 1.3. Irregular migration 11 2. Belarus 16 2.1. Management of migration processes 16 2.2. Regular migration 17 2.3. Irregular migration 18 3. Republic of Moldova 21 3.1. Migration process management 21 3.2. Regular migration 22 3.3. Irregular migration 22 Conclusions 24 Annexes 25 Overview of Migration Trends in the Countries – EU Member States of the Söderköping Process for the period of 2004–2006 34 Introduction 34 Trends in Regular and Irregular Migration 36 Estonia 36 Hungary 37 Latvia 38 Lithuania 41 Poland 42 Romania 45 Th e Slovak Republic 48 Th e fl ow of migrants from the new EU member states to the United Kingdom, Ireland and Sweden. 51 Conclusions 54 Conclusions: Trends in the irregular migration fl ows 55 Bibliography 58 Annexes 59 3 Introduction As the Söderköping process gains further momentum, it increasingly faces a changing environ- ment, newly-emerging patterns of migration fl ows and border management, and a new dynamic of EU enlargement. While cross-border cooperation, migration and asylum matters across the EU ex- ternal frontier has been very much at the heart of the Söderköping process since its very start, the ac- cession of the Baltic states, Poland, Slovak Republic, Hungary and, recently, Romania to the European Union has changed migration dynamics in the region considerably. While an obvious change took place in migration patterns, the EU enlargement also had an impact on the regulatory framework, adjusted some priorities in strengthening administrative and operational capacity of the participat- ing countries, and highlighted further areas and needs of cross-border cooperation on migration and border management, and refugee protection. Th e current publication provides a comprehensive overview of migration trends in the ten participating countries covering both regular and irregular migration in a systematic manner. Th e fi rst part, written by Dr. Irina Pribytkova covers Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova and the second, part written by Juris Gromovs covers the seven EU member-states. While some remaining diff erences in statistical approach makes few comparisons diffi cult, these studies provide broad empirical evidence from a comparative perspective, the analysis of which presents a number of conclusions and newly emerging patterns, both in migration fl ows as well as approaches to regulate them. Sizable, precise and up to date statistical amendments and color illustrations will help readers to learn about migra- tion trends in the region. Th e accession of the new countries to the EU changed some migration pat- terns considerably; while identifying the immediate eff ects, the study focuses on the long-tem agenda, challenges and solutions, of cross-border cooperation across the EU external frontier. While this publication is intended chiefl y as a source of reference for migration, asylum and border control offi cials of the Söderköping process countries, we trust it will be of interest to a broader audience, including academia, or anyone with an interest into the current developments and priori- ties of border and migration management in Europe. Th e full text of this publication is available on line for download at www.soderkoping.org.ua May, 2007 4 Regular and Irregular Migration in Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova, 2004–2006 Irina Pribytkova, professor Introduction Th e enlargement of the European Union in 2004 has changed the geopolitical map of Eastern and Central Europe. Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova, bordering the new EU member states of Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania in the West, became Eastern neighbours of the expanding European Union. At the same time, all the three countries borders with other states of the Commonwealth of Independent states (CIS): Ukraine and Belarus with the Russian Federation, while Moldova shares a border with Ukraine. Along the whole length, these frontiers remain quite porous. Th is factor has a considerable impact on the volume, structure and intensity of migration fl ows, both legal and illegal. In this context, Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova are viewed as the countries of origin, destination and transit of various migration fl ows. Th e Th ematic programme for cooperation with third countries in the areas of migration and asy- lum adopted by the European Commission on 25 January 2006 acknowledges the increase in the types and volumes of international migration fl ows, diversifi cation of countries of their origin and destination, rise in the number of migration routes and their combined impact on the European Union’s bilateral and regional relationships with third countries. In the information report submitted to the European Parliament and European Council, migration is viewed as one of the strategic priori- ties in external relations of the EU. Due to the complex problems of integration of migrants into the host societies, immigration has become an increasingly frequent topic on Europe’s political agenda. Links between migration and security have also been receiving close attention of international organisations dealing with relevant issues of the modern European political realities. In particular, migration is studied and addressed by the International Organization for Migration, the Offi ce of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Centre for Migration Policy Development. For example, the results of a comprehensive analysis of migration situation in CIS countries, including Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova, were presented in three reference publications of the International Organization for Migration in 1997, 1999 and 2002. Th e fi rst of these publications was the “CIS Migration Report: 1996”. Th e second report “Migration in the CIS: 1997–1998. Th e 1999 edition” was published two years later. Finally, in 2002, the third report “Migration Trends in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: 2001–2002 Review” was released. In addition to these publications, under the initiative of the IOM Mission in Ukraine, two reports were prepared in 2004 and 2006 on migra- tion dynamics in the country based on the data review of governmental statistics, while migration legislation of Ukraine was used as a methodological basis for analytical study, as follows: “Review of migration situation in Ukraine according to national and ministerial statistics data: 2002–2003.”; “Review of migration situation in Ukraine according to national and ministerial statistics data: 2004–2005”. Over the last two years, analytical studies in the fi eld of migration processes in CIS countries received additional methodological backup with the release of the following publications: 5 Review of migration systems in CIS countries / IOM: 2005. – 433 p.; Labour migration in the countries of Central Asia, Russian Federation, Afghanistan and Tajikistan. Analytical review / IOM: 2005. – 145 p.; Labour Migration Assessment for the WNIS Region / IOM: 2006/ – 36 p. Th e review of migration systems in CIS countries was prepared as part of the Project “Th e expan- sion of the Budapest process to the CIS region for the prevention of irregular migration inside the region, from the region and through its territory” under the auspices of the International Centre for Migration Policy Development acting as the Secretariat of the Budapest process. Th is review is based mainly on the information collected by the Centre’s staff and experts from CIS member states in the course of expert working missions to all the twelve CIS states. Th e analytical review of labour migration in Central Asian countries, the Russian Federation, Afghanistan and Pakistan was carried out as part of the Programme on the development of dialogue and technical capacity building in migration process management in the countries of Central Asia, Russian Federation, Afghanistan and Pakistan under the auspices of the International Organization for Migration with fi nancial support provided by the European Commission. Th e analytical report “Labour Migration Assessment for the WNIS Region,” produced by the IOM Mission in Ukraine in 2006, provides a review of the
Recommended publications
  • On the State Border Service of Ukraine
    On the State Border Service of Ukraine (Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR), 2003, N 27, st.208) (As amended in accordance with the Laws N 965-IV ( 965-15 ) Dated 19.06.2003, VVR, 2003, N 45, st.357 N 2505-IV ( 2505-15 ) On 25.03.2005, VVR, 2005, N 17, N 18-19, st.267 N 3200-IV ( 3200-15 ) On 15.12.2005, VVR, 2006, N 14, st.116 N 328-V ( 328-16 ) Dated 03.11.2006, VVR, 2006, N 51, st.519 N 489-V ( 489-16 ) Dated 19.12.2006, VVR, 2007, N 7-8, st.66 N 1014-V ( 1014-16 ) Dated 11.05.2007, VVR, 2007, N 33, st.442 N 107-VI ( 107-17 ) Dated 28.12.2007, VVR, 2008, N 5-6, N 7-8, st.78 - Changes are on December 31, 2008 N 289-VI ( 289-17 ) Dated 20.05.2008, VVR, 2008, N 26, st.243) (In addition, see. Decision of the Constitutional Court N 10-rp/2008 ( v010p710-08 ) Dated 22.05.2008) (As amended in accordance with the Laws N 586-VI ( 586-17 ) Dated 24.09.2008, VVR, 2009, N 10-11, st.137 N 884-VI ( 884-17 ) Dated 15.01.2009, VVR, 2009, N 24, st.298 N 1710-VI ( 1710-17 ) Dated 05.11.2009) (Document obtained from official sources - http://zakon.rada.gov.ua) This Law in accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine ( 254k/96-VR ) defines the legal basis and organization of the State Border Service of Ukraine and its overall structure, size, functions and powers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project "Transnistrian Problem: View from Ukraine"
    Strategic and Security Studies Group TRANSNISTRIAN PROBLEM: a view from Ukraine KYIV 2009 STRATEGIC AND SECURITY STUDIES GROUP The publication contains the results of the research of interstate relations between Ukraine and Moldova through the lens of Transnistrian settlement problem. The focal points of the research are the assessment of cooperation between two states, issues of citizenship, border regime, interethnic relations, NGOs partnership etc. The publication is aimed at enhancing the dialogue of Ukrainian and Moldovan experts and politicians. It was prepared within the project “Transnistrian problem: a view from Ukraine” supported by International Renaissance Foundation (project manager – O.Basarab). Chapters 14 and 16 were prepared with the kind assistance of Open Ukraine Foundation and Victor Pinchuk Foundation. The project was implemented by “Strategic and Security Studies Group” (SSSG) - non-governmental organization, which has been working since 2003 in the field of: National security policy and sustainable development of Ukraine International relations and foreign policy of Ukraine Regional and international security European political and integration processes Euro Atlantic dialogue and integration SSSG supports transparency in decision-making process and wider discussion regarding foreign, security and defense policy policy of Ukraine and to promotes democratic changes in society. Our contacts: Info[a]gsbs.org.ua www.gsbs.org.ua + 38 (044) 491 - 3830 Publication edited by S. GERASYMCHUK Authors: N. BELITSER (Pylyp Orlyk Institute for Democracy) S. GERASYMCHUK (Strategic and Security Studies Group) O. GRYTSENKO (Strategic and Security Studies Group) Y. DOVGOPOL (Independent expert) Z. ZHMINKO (Strategic and Security Studies Group) Y. MATIYCHYK (Strategic and Security Studies Group) O. SUSHKO (Institute of Euro-atlantic Cooperation) O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Customs Code of Ukraine
    The Customs Code of Ukraine (SECTION 1 - SECTION IV) As amended by laws of Ukraine No.291-IV of November 28, 2002 No.348-IV of December 24, 2002 The Customs Code of Ukraine defines the foundation and implementation principles of customs practice in Ukraine, and regulates economic, organizational, legal, personnel and social aspects of the activities of the customs service of Ukraine. The Code aims to secure the protection of Ukraine's economic interests, to create favorable conditions for the development of its economy, to protect the rights and interests of subjects of entrepreneurial activity and citizens, as well as to ensure adherence to Ukrainian customs- related legislation. SECTION 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter 1. THE FOUNDATIONS OF CUSTOMS PRACTICE Article 1. Definition of Basic Terms and Concepts The terms and concepts listed below are used in this Code in the following meaning: 1) currency values: currency of Ukraine - token money in the form of bank notes, treasury notes, coins and other forms, which are in circulation and are legal tender on the territory of Ukraine, as well as those withdrawn or being withdrawn from circulation, but are subject to exchange for token money in circulation; foreign currency – foreign token money in the form of bank notes, treasury notes and coins, which are in circulation and are legal tender on the territory of the respective foreign state, as well as those withdrawn or being withdrawn from circulation, but are subject to exchange for token money in circulation; payment documents and other securities (shares , bonds, coupons thereto, bills of exchange (promissory notes), bills of debt, letters of credit, checks, banker’s order , certificates of deposit, other financial or bank documents), denominated in the Ukrainian currency, foreign currency or bank metals; bank metals – gold, silver, platinum, metals of the platinum group, refined (affinaged) to the highest grades in accordance with world standards, in ingots and powder, which possess certificates of quality, as well as coins, manufactured of precious metals.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Ukraine
    CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 28, 1996 Amended by the Laws of Ukraine № 2222-IV dated December 8, 2004, № 2952-VI dated February 1, 2011, № 586-VII dated September 19, 2013, № 742-VII dated February 21, 2014, № 1401-VIII dated June 2, 2016 № 2680-VIII dated February 7, 2019 The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, on behalf of the Ukrainian people - citizens of Ukraine of all nationalities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, based on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and on the right to self-determination realised by the Ukrainian nation, all the Ukrainian people, providing for the guarantee of human rights and freedoms and of the worthy conditions of human life, caring for the strengthening of civil harmony on Ukrainian soil, and confirming the European identity of the Ukrainian people and the irreversibility of the European and Euro-Atlantic course of Ukraine, striving to develop and strengthen a democratic, social, law-based state, aware of responsibility before God, our own conscience, past, present and future generations, guided by the Act of Declaration of the Independence of Ukraine of August 24, 1991, approved by the national vote on December 1, 1991, adopts this Constitution - the Fundamental Law of Ukraine. Chapter I General Principles Article 1 Ukraine is a sovereign and independent, democratic, social, law-based state. Article 2 The sovereignty of Ukraine extends throughout its entire territory. Ukraine is a unitary state. The territory of Ukraine within its present border is indivisible and inviolable. Article 3 The human being, his or her life and health, honour and dignity, inviolability and security are recognised in Ukraine as the highest social value.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine – Russia: Relationships 2014 – Present
    Ukraine – Russia: Relationships 2014 – present Simulation of Negotiations: Ukraine-Russia-European Union Relations Dr. Vitalijs Butenko Dr. Sibylle Zürcher NECOM | 07.03.2017 | 1 1. Introduction NECOM | 07.03.2017 | 2 Ukraine Situation as of 2013: - Form of government: Semi-presidential republic - Administrative units: - 24 regions (“oblast”) - 2 cities of republican subordination (Kiev and Sevastopol) - Autonomous Republic of Crimea - Population*: - 48.4 m (2001 census) - 42.5 m (2016 estimate) - GDP (current prices)*: - $179.5 b (2013) - $87.2 b (2016 estimate) - Security: - 250’000 army personnel0 - Following Budapest agreement in 1994 the nuclear arsenal is removed to Russia in exchange for assurances against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine and admission to Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT). NECOM | 07.03.2017 | 3 * Note from IMF: 2013 data excludes Crimea and Sevastopol for comparison purposes with 2014 data. 2. Background on the crisis in Ukraine 5. Sept. 2014: Minsk protocol, Convoy cease fire Nov 2013 – Sept 2014 Odessa Dec 2014-Feb Conflict intensity 2015: Debaltseve “Pocket” War Mar. 2014: MH17 Civil war erupts in Luhansk and Donetsk regions 12. Sept. 2014: Ratification of the Mar. 2014: UKR-EU association US and EU agreement Crisis sanctions 21 Feb. 2014: Mar. 2014: Crisis settlement deal Incorporation of Crimea by Russia 22-23 Feb. 2014: Yanukovitch leaves Ukraine; Maidan leaders take over Open the government conflict 26. Sept. 2014 Another gas- Nov. 2013: UKR: repays $3.1 bn price crisis Euromaidan debt in steps UKR-RUS, EU begins RUS: Resumes as mediator supply at price $385 per 1,000 m2 Unstable peace StableNov.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT NAFTOGAZ FINANCIAL INDICATORS NAFTOGAZ GROUP NET CONTRIBUTIONS to the STATE BUDGET 2016 2016, UAH Billion in 20142016, UAH BILLION
    Ukrnafta (50%+1 share) Oil and gas production Naftogaz of Ukraine Ukrtransnafta (100%) NAFTOGAZ Headquarters, trading Oil transmission and storage Ukrgazvydobuvannya (100%) Ukrtatnafta (43 %) GROUP Oil and gas upstream GROUP Oil refining and storage Ukrtransgaz (100%) Petrosannan Company (JV, Egypt) STRUCTURE Oil and gas production Gas transmission and storage OIL Ukrspetstransgaz (100%) Zakordonnaftogaz (100%) LHG railway transportation GAS 6% Oil and gas production revenues Gas of Ukraine (100%) Retail supply until 2012 92% revenues OTHER Ukravtogaz (100%) Naukanaftogaz (100%) CNG retail (stations) 2% Research and development revenues Naftogaz Trading Europe S.A. (100%) (former Naftogaz Overseas S.A.) Vuhlesyntezgaz of Ukraine (100%) Development of gas replacement projects Trading (Geneva) Kirovohradgaz (51%) LIKVO (100%) Gas distribution and supply Prevention of emergencies Chornomornaftogaz* (100%) Naftogazbezpeka (100%) Oil and gas upstream Security services Ukrnaftogazkomplekt (100%) Supply of equipment Naftogazobslugovuvannia (100%) Services Gas value chain: 92% of the group revenues Oil value chain: 6 % of the group revenues EXPLORATION AND TRANSMISSION AND MARKETING AND EXPLORATION AND TRANSMISSION AND IMPORT DISTRIBUTION REFINING MARKETING AND RETAIL PRODUCTION STORAGE SUPPLY PRODUCTION STORAGE UKRGAZVYDOBUVANNYA NAFTOGAZ (HQ) UKRTRANSGAZ 1.5% NAFTOGAZ UKRNAFTA UKRTRANSNAFTA UKRTATNAFTA UKRNAFTA natural monopoly Naftogaz share in the segment (50 % + 1 share) natural monopoly (43 %) The biggest retail chain in Ukraine: 14.6 bcm
    [Show full text]
  • Vol.39 N° 68
    ppi 201502ZU4645 Esta publicación científica en formato digital es continuidad de la revista impresa ISSN-Versión Impresa 0798-1406 / ISSN-Versión on line 2542-3185Depósito legal pp 197402ZU34 Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Derecho Público "Dr. Humberto J. La Roche" de la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas de la Universidad del Zulia Maracaibo, Venezuela Vol.39 N° 68 Enero Junio 2021 ISSN 0798- 1406 ~ De pó si to le gal pp 198502ZU132 * Keywords: terrorist, andseparatistdemonstrationsonUkraine’s stateborder. borders, and thespreadofextremist, border regions,aswell as atUkraine’s threat of escalation of border conflicts and militaryintegrity in sovereign territory. Itisconcluded that there is apotential clashes in Ukraine’s state border threatened to lose the state part of sovereignty, territorial It wasrevealed that theincomplete process of legalthe formalization of formalizing the Ukrainian state border with the Russian Federation. threats toUkraine’snationalsecurity arising fromtheincomplete process state Ukrainian border with neigh bouring countries and highlights the main article seekstoanalyzethecurrentsituationoflegal formalization of the examination inthe context of complex relations between two states. This formalization of the Ukrainian-Russian state border requirescloser [email protected] ORCID ID Kyiv, Ukraine, Guard ServiceofUkraine, First Deputy Head of the State Border GuardService of Ukraine, Administrationof the State Border Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas Vol. 39, Nº 68 (Enero - Junio) 2021, 866-881 IEPDP-Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas - LUZ La re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas, es una pu bli ca ción aus pi cia da por el Ins ti tu to de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co “Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow Report to Ukraine's 19Th to 21Th Periodic
    SUBMISSION TO THE 79TH SESSION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION SHADOW REPORT TO UKRAINE’S 19TH TO 21TH PERIODIC REPORT UNDER THE ICERD The “Social Action” Centre – “No Borders” project Minority Rights Group International Contact persons: Bernadett Sebaly: [email protected] Iryna Fedorovych: [email protected] July 2011 1 CONTENTS 1. Introduction & Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 3 2. Recommendations……………………………………………………………………………..4 3. Prohibition of Discrimination In Ukraine: The Legislative Framework And The Practice Of Its Implementation..............................................................................................................................6 4. Failure of Ukraine authorities to protect minorities from racist violence and bring perpetrators of it to liability............................................................................................................................................9 5. Failure of Ukraine to meet the requirement of Article 4 of CERD by effectively banning propaganda and incitement of racial discrimination.........................................................................................18 6. Inefficiency Of Prohibition Of Discrimination Contained In Ukrainian Legislation (Article 2(1)(D))..........................................................................................................................................21 7. Inadequacy of Institutional
    [Show full text]
  • Reply of the Russian Federation to the Written Observations and Submissions of Ukraine on Jurisdiction
    PCA Case No. 2017-06 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION before AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER ANNEX VII TO THE 1982 UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA between UKRAINE and THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION in respect of a DISPUTE CONCERNING COASTAL STATE RIGHTS IN THE BLACK SEA, SEA OF AZOV, AND KERCH STRAIT Volume I - REPLY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION TO THE WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS AND SUBMISSIONS OF UKRAINE ON JURISDICTION ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL: Judge Jin-Hyun Paik, President Judge Boualem Bouguetaia Judge Alonso Gómez-Robledo Judge Vladimir Golitsyn Professor Vaughan Lowe, QC REGISTRY: The Permanent Court of Arbitration 28 January 2019 page intentionally left blank INDEX OF MATERIALS Volume I Reply of the Russian Federation to the Written Observations and Submissions of Ukraine on Jurisdiction Volume II Exhibits Volume III Legal Authorities (in electronic form only) i page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 THE TRIBUNAL HAS NO JURISDICTION OVER UKRAINE’S CLAIM: THE TRIBUNAL CANNOT DETERMINE WHICH STATE IS SOVEREIGN OVER THE LAND TERRITORY OF CRIMEA.................................................................................. 7 I. Alleged inadmissibility .................................................................................................. 9 II. Alleged implausibility .................................................................................................. 12 III. Mauritius
    [Show full text]
  • THEMATIC REPORT Freedom of Movement Across The
    SEC.FR/511/15 22 June 2015 ENGLISH only THEMATIC REPORT Freedom of movement across the administrative boundary line with Crimea 19 June 2015 Contents 1. Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3 3. The administrative boundary line with Crimea ............................................................................... 4 4. Legal context ................................................................................................................................... 5 5. Challenges in crossing the administrative boundary line ................................................................ 6 5.1. Citizenship and passports issues ............................................................................................. 6 5.2. Practical implications of documentary requirements .............................................................. 7 5.3. Suspension of public transport to Crimea ............................................................................... 8 5.4. Cases of the Crimean Tatars and people with pro-Ukrainian views restricted in crossing the ABL…………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Annex No. 1 Map of the ABL between the Kherson region and Crimea ............................................. 10 2 1. Summary The establishment of de facto control over the Autonomous
    [Show full text]
  • The One-Eyed Man and the Wicked Boar
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College Spring 5-2021 The One-Eyed Man and the Wicked Boar Iaryna Iasenytska Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the International and Area Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Political Theory Commons This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ONE-EYED MAN AND THE WICKED BOAR by Iaryna Iasenytska A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree with Honors (International Affairs) The Honors College The University of Maine May 2021 Advisory Committee: Kristin Vekasi, Professor of Political Science and School of Policy & International Affairs, Advisor Robert Ballingall, Assistant Professor of Political Science Robert Glover, Associate Professor of Political Science & Honors Lora Pitman, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Political Science Stefano Tijerina, Lecturer in Management ©2021- Iasenytska All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT This thesis examines territorial authoritarian threats to the Western world through an examination of historical and contemporary case studies. The historical examples used in this thesis are from Eastern Europe, since it had many chances to engage in international law with the authoritarian state, leading its people to understand the nature of one of the oldest authoritarian states: Russia. The four case studies used are: 1) Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (1918), 2) Soviet Invasion of Poland (1939-1940), 3) Soviet Occupation of Baltic states (1939-1945), and 4) Russian Annexation of Crimea (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Security & Defence
    NATIONAL SECURITY & DEFENCE CONTENT π 1-2 (177-178) THE WAR IN DONBAS: REALITIES AND PROSPECTS OF SETTLEMENT ................2 2019 1. GEOPOLITICAL ASPECTS OF CONFLICT IN DONBAS ............................................3 Founded and published by: 1.1. Russia’s “hybrid” aggression: geopolitical dimension ................................................ 3 1.2. Russian intervention in Donbas: goals and specifics .................................................. 6 1.3. Role and impact of the West in settling the conflict in Donbas .................................12 1.4. Ukraine’s policy for Donbas ......................................................................................24 2. OCCUPATION OF DONBAS: CURRENT SITUATION AND TRENDS ........................35 UKRAINIAN CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC & POLITICAL STUDIES 2.1. Military component of Donbas occupation ...............................................................35 NAMED AFTER OLEXANDER RAZUMKOV 2.2. Socio-economic situation in the occupied territories ................................................42 Director General Anatoliy Rachok 2.3. Energy aspect of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine .......................................................50 Editor-in-Chief Yuriy Yakymenko 2.4. Ideology and information policy in “DPR-LPR” .........................................................56 2.5. Environmental situation in the occupied territories ...................................................62 Editor Hanna Pashkova 3. DONBAS: SCENARIOS OF DEVELOPMENTS Halyna Balanovych AND PROSPECTS
    [Show full text]