DOCSLIB.ORG

Howitzer Battery of the Regimental Armored Cavalry Squadron

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Howitzer Battery of the Regimental Armored Cavalry Squadron FM 17-95 HOWITZER BATTERY OF THE REGIMENTAL ARMORED CAVALRY SQUADRON During reconnaissance operations, the centrally positioned well forward within the squadron's artillery battery is usually used as squadron area. It will usually be given a a unit. This adds to efficient round-the-clock direct support mission with priority of fires operations and ease of massing fires. Some- established by the squadron commander. times, it may be necessary to split the During squadron movements (for example, battery. This is usually not desirable as it the squadron moves from the assembly area compounds the problems of fire direction, to an area reconnaissance) the battery should maintenance support, resupply, and com- be placed in the line of march far enough mand and control. However, a battery may forward to provide fires for the leading be split so that all squadron elements are elements of the squadron. within a field artillery range fan. The battery may frequently displace by platoons during reconnaissance operations to give continuous FM 6-20 contains fire planning, tactics, fire support. The battery should normally be and techniques for field artillery. 5-55 C1, FM 17-95 Reconnaissance instructions are nor- Reconnaissance orders should ensure a mally issued orally as an operation order. coordinated effort, but should not unneces- Changes are in the form of fragmentary sarily restrict subordinate commanders. orders (FRAGO's). Generally, time available When possible, squadron commanders and prevents preparation and issuance of a commanders of units reporting to or support- written order before starting an operation. In ing the regiment should be assembled to this case, the written order may be prepared receive the order. This face-to-face meeting after the fact for historical purposes. helps ensure that schemes of maneuver and fire If the regiment is to conduct, or requires a support are understood. After reconnais- subordinate unit to conduct, two or more sance begins, FRAGO's are issued as neces- reconnaissance missions concurrently, it sary. These orders are usually transmitted must set priorities. These priorities are by radio, but may also be sent in writing by determined by the relative importance of messenger or radio teletypewriter. Messen- information sought and time available. gers at the regimental level often use aircraft. ARMORED AND AIR CAVALRY SQUADRONS Command and control considerations regiment. The difference is in the scope of during reconnaissance operations at squad- command and level of operation. ron level are essentially the same as at ARMORED CAVALRY, AIR CAVALRY, AND CAVALRY TROOPS During reconnaissance operations, a * Zone, area, route, or axis of advance. troop commander operates from his battle- * When, field vehicle. where, and how information is to be required. A troop commander controls his unit through the executive officer and platoon Time of departure. leaders. At times, an air cavalry troop * Phase lines, control points, recon- commander may elect to directly control naissance objectives, and, when teams. required, the times they are to be reached. A reconnaissance mission is normally assigned to the troop as a unit with specified Locations and procedures for control measures. When more than one refueling/rearming, when required. mission is assigned, a priority is stated. A • Time mission is to be completed. troop commander assigns tasks to platoons. Instructions to platoons include: * Action after the mission is completed. Available information on the enemy and friendly troops in the area of operation. A troop commander issues orders orally to his platoon or section/team leaders. * Plans of the higher commander, After reconnaissance when appropriate. begins, additional instruc- tions are provided by radio,messenger, or by * Specific information desired. the troop commander in person. 5-57 FM 17-95 ARMORED CAVALRY, CAVALRY, AND AIR CAVALRY PLATOONS A reconnaissance mission is assigned to a platoon by the parent troop. After receiving the order, the platoon leader issues orders to his platoon. After the reconnaissance starts, additional instructions are disseminated by radio, messenger, or the platoon leader in person. The platoon leader moves and locates where he can best control the team. An armored cavalry or cavalry platoon uses hand-and-arm (or a flag as an extension of the arm) signals as often as possible to reduce radio transmissions. This is done more frequently within teams than between them. An air cavalry platoon or team must rely primarily on radio. Well developed standing operating procedures and the use of the same personalities together as frequently as possible reduce need for radio transmissions. SUMMARY The purpose of reconnaissance is to gather information upon which commanders may base plans, decisions, and orders. The three types of reconnaissance are route, zone, and area. A route reconnaissancemission is concerned with a specific route and all adjacent terrain from which the enemy could influence movement along that route. Zone reconnaissanceis the reconnaissance of all natural and man- made features within specified boundaries. An area reconnaissanceis conducted to obtain information about a specified area; for example, a town, a ridge, or a woods. Cavalry conducts reconnaissance according to five fundamentals: Orient on the location or movement of the reconnaissance objective. Report all information rapidly and accurately. * Retain freedom to maneuver. • Gain and maintain enemy contact. * Develop the situation rapidly. 5-58 FM_ 17-95 ® CHAPTER 6 SECURITY OPERATIONS The purpose of security operations is to provide reaction time, maneuver space, and information about the enemy to the main body. Security includes all measures taken to prevent observation, annoyance, surprise, espionage, or sabotage. Aggressive and bold reconnaissance to reduce the unknowns in terrain and enemy situation is an integral part of security. CONTENTS PAGE THE THREAT....................................................6-4 SCREEN......................................................... 6-11 GUARD.......... ................................................ 6-20 COVER........... ............................................... 6-27 OFFENSE................................................... 6-35 DEFENSE.........................................6-40 DELAY ..... .................................................... 6-47 AREA SECURITY................................................ 6-52 AIR CAVALRY ............................................................. 6-55 TANK COMPANY OF THE REGIMENTAL ARMORED CAVALRY SQUADRON........................................ 6-58 HOWITZER BATTERY OF THE REGIMENTAL ARMORED CAVALRY SQUADRON........................................ 6-58 NIGHT OPERATIONS............................................. 6-59 COMMAND CONTROL CONSIDERATIONS ............................... 6-61 SUMMARY....................................................... 6-68 - FM 17-95 When. Cavalry units conduct security Where. Security forces may operate to operations when directed. the front, flanks, or rear of a moving or stationary main body. Why. Cavalry units conducting secu- rity operations provide information about the size, composition, location, and direction of Operation and Orientation. The the movement of enemy forces, and provide type of operation and the orientation with reaction time and maneuver space so that the regard to the main body are determined by: main body can be warned, prepared, and properly deployed to engage the enemy. Cavalry units are specially organized, equipped, and trained to conduct security operations over wide and deep areas, thus Mission: Usually stated as cover, permitting the main body commander to guard (protect), or screen. retain tanks, mechanized infantry, and other combat units in the main body, ready to concentrate at the place and time of decision. * Enemy: Most dangerous direction (front, flank, or rear) with respect to the main body. What. Security operations include: Terrain: Extent of space available. * Troops and Equipment Available: Number and size of cavalry units available to the commander. Time and Space Required. SScreen: Maintain surveillance and provide early warning by maintaining contact with enemy forces encountered. Air Cavalry. As in reconnaissance A screening force must impede and operations, air cavalry is integrated with harass the enemy by organic and sup- ground cavalry during security operations. porting fires, and within its capability, Most often, air cavalry screens and acts as a must destroy or repel enemy patrols. rapid reaction force. It may be used as an advance guard when the situation is fluid. Such a mission is conducted in the same f Guard (Protect): Prevent enemy ground observation, direct fire, and manner as a route reconnaissance when the surprise attack. A guard force destroys, situation is fluid. Such a mission is con- stops, or delays the enemy within its ducted in the same manner as a route capability. reconnaissance when enemy contact is likely (page 5-45). Air cavalry does not conduct a flank or rear guard. It does not conduct a E Cover: Operate apart from the main covering force mission. It usually reconnoi- body to intercept, engage, deceive, disor- ters and screens forward and/or to the flanks ganize, and destroy enemy forces before of ground cavalry during movement to they can attack or halt the main body. contact. After a line of contact has develop- 6-2 FM 17-95 ed, air cavalry may reconnoiter and screen to FUNDAMENTALS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 16Th Infantry Division 47Th Field Artillery Camp Kearny, California Private John Leslie Banner
    16th Infantry Division 47th Field Artillery Camp Kearny, California Private John Leslie Banner John Leslie Banner, a son of Samuel Banner and Ellen Radford Banner, was born on November 5, 1896 in Upton, Utah. He was the tenth of eleven children in the family of seven girls and four boys. He entered the army on September 3, 1918 and was assigned to Camp Kearny, California where he was training in the field artillery. While training, he became ill with influenza and developed pneumonia. The military contacted his Mother and she traveled to Camp Kearny to be at his side when he died. Just before he died, he told his mother, “Tell the folks not to feel bad. I am one out of thousands”. He died on December 6, 1918. A military funeral was held at Camp Kearny before his body was shipped home. Funeral services were held at the Coalville, Utah cemetery and he was buried there. At the time of his death, he was survived by his parents, four sisters and two brothers: Mary Ellen, Elizabeth Ann, Lydia, Cora Leone, Samuel, and William Henry. He was preceded in death by three sisters and one brother: Frances Alice, Lydia May, Mabel, and Benjamin. During World War I, the 16th Division was renamed the 37th Infantry Division. The formation of another division designated as the 16th Division occurred in 1918 and was stationed at Camp Kearny, California. It never went overseas and it was one of several divisions in WWI that did not select an insignia. The Army has not designated a new division as the 16th since it was demobilized in March 1919..
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2020 3
    SIPRI Fact Sheet March 2021 TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL KEY FACTS w The volume of international ARMS TRANSFERS, 2020 transfers of major arms in 2016–20 was 0.5 per cent lower than in 2011–15 and 12 per cent pieter d. wezeman, alexandra kuimova and higher than in 2006–10. siemon t. wezeman w The five largest arms exporters in 2016–20 were the The volume of international transfers of major arms in 2016–20 was United States, Russia, France, 0.5 per cent lower than in 2011–15 and 12 per cent higher than in 2006–10 Germany and China. Together, they accounted for 76 per cent of (see figure 1).1 The five largest arms exporters in 2016–20 were the United all exports of major arms in States, Russia, France, Germany and China (see table 1). The five largest 2016–20. arms importers were Saudi Arabia, India, Egypt, Australia and China w In 2016–20 US arms exports (see table 2). Between 2011–15 and 2016–20 there were increases in arms accounted for 37 per cent of the transfers to the Middle East (25 per cent) and to Europe (12 per cent), while global total and were 15 per cent there were decreases in the transfers to Africa (–13 per cent), the Americas higher than in 2011–15. (–43 per cent), and Asia and Oceania (–8.3 per cent). w Russian arms exports From 15 March 2021 SIPRI’s open-access Arms Transfers Database decreased by 22 per cent includes updated data on transfers of major arms for 1950–2020, which between 2011–15 and 2016–20.
    [Show full text]
  • The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2Nd December 1917
    Centre for First World War Studies A Moonlight Massacre: The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2nd December 1917 by Michael Stephen LoCicero Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law June 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The Third Battle of Ypres was officially terminated by Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig with the opening of the Battle of Cambrai on 20 November 1917. Nevertheless, a comparatively unknown set-piece attack – the only large-scale night operation carried out on the Flanders front during the campaign – was launched twelve days later on 2 December. This thesis, a necessary corrective to published campaign narratives of what has become popularly known as „Passchendaele‟, examines the course of events from the mid-November decision to sanction further offensive activity in the vicinity of Passchendaele village to the barren operational outcome that forced British GHQ to halt the attack within ten hours of Zero. A litany of unfortunate decisions and circumstances contributed to the profitless result.
    [Show full text]
  • American Armies and Battlefields in Europe
    Chapter v1 THE AMERICAN BATTLEFIELDS NORTH OF PARIS chapter gives brief accounts of areas and to all of the American ceme- all American fighting whi ch oc- teries and monuments. This route is Thiscurred on the battle front north of recommended for those who desire to Paris and complete information concern- make an extended automobile tour in the ing the American military cemeteries and region. Starting from Paris, it can be monuments in that general region. The completely covered in four days, allowing military operations which are treated are plenty of time to stop on the way. those of the American lst, 27th, 30th, The accounts of the different operations 33d, 37th, 80th and 91st Divisions and and the descriptions of the American the 6th and 11 th Engineer Regiments. cemeteries and monuments are given in Because of the great distances apart of the order they are reached when following So uthern Encr ance to cb e St. Quentin Can al Tunnel, Near Bellicourc, October 1, 1918 the areas where this fighting occurred no the suggested route. For tbis reason they itinerary is given. Every operation is do not appear in chronological order. described, however, by a brief account Many American units otber tban those illustrated by a sketch. The account and mentioned in this chapter, sucb as avia- sketch together give sufficient information tion, tank, medical, engineer and infantry, to enable the tourist to plan a trip through served behind this part of the front. Their any particular American combat area. services have not been recorded, however, The general map on the next page as the space limitations of tbis chapter indicates a route wbich takes the tourist required that it be limited to those Amer- either int o or cl ose to all of tbese combat ican organizations which actually engaged (371) 372 THE AMERICAN B ATTLEFIELD S NO R TH O F PARIS Suggested Tour of American Battlefields North of Paris __ Miles Ghent ( î 37th and 91st Divisions, Ypres-Lys '"offensive, October 30-November 11, 1918 \ ( N \ 1 80th Division, Somme 1918 Albert 33d Division.
    [Show full text]
  • The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars As Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1965 The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars as Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War Charles John Goodall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Goodall, Charles John, "The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars as Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War" (1965). Master's Theses. 3907. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3907 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UTILIZATION OF ARTILLERY AND MORTARS AS INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS IN THE CHACO WAR by Charles John Goodall A thesis presented to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June, 1965 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation for the co-operation of the following agencies and research facilities in gathering materials and providing technical advice in the production of this thesis: The University of Texas Library, Austin, Texas. The University of North Carolina Library, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The University of Florida Library, Gainesville, Florida. Duke University Library, Durham, North Carolina. The University of California Library, Los Angeles, California The United States Army War College, Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas. The United States Army Ordnance School, Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominant Land Forces for 21St Century Warfare
    No. 73 SEPTEMBER 2009 Dominant Land Forces for 21st Century Warfare Edmund J. Degen A National Security Affairs aperP published on occasion by THE INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY Arlington, Virginia Dominant Land Forces for 21st Century Warfare by Edmund J. Degen The Institute of Land Warfare ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER The purpose of the Institute of Land Warfare is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of ILW’s editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper, but does suggest that the Association believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER NO. 73, September 2009 Dominant Land Forces for 21st Century Warfare by Edmund J. Degen Colonel Edmund J. Degen recently completed the senior service college at the Joint Forces Staff College and moved to the Republic of Korea, where he served as the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) J35, Chief of Future Operations. He is presently the Commander of the 3d Battlefield Coordination Detachment–Korea. He previously served as Special Assistant to General William S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Messines
    CHAPTER XV THE BATTLE OF MESSINES-JUNE 7TH BEFOREmost great attacks on the Western Front, during that critical last night in which, generally, the infantry left its billets and made its way, first, in column of fours on dark roads beside moving wheel and motor traffic, then, usually in file, along tracks marked across the open, and finally into communication trenches to wind silently out in the small hours and line the “ jumping-off ” trenches or white tapes laid in the long wet grass of open No-Man’s Land, where for an hour or two it must await the signal to assault-during these critical hours one thought was usually uppermost in the men’s minds: does the enemy know? With the tactics of 1917,involving tremendous preparatory bombardments, which entailed months of preliminary railway and road construction, G.H.Q. had been forced to give up the notion of keeping an attack secret until it was delivered. Enemy airmen could not fail to observe these works and also the new camps, supply centres, casualty clearing stations, hangars for aeroplanes. Reference has been made to the Comniander-in-Chief’s desire to impart the impression, in April, of a serious attack, and,‘in May, of a feint. But the final week’s bombardment had given sure notice of the operation, and the most that could be hoped for was that the enemy might be deceived as to the main stroke that would come after, and might continue to expect it at Arras rather than at Ypres. As far as the Messines offensive went, the Germans must know that a great attack-whether feint or principal operation-was imminent ; indeed, German prisoners spoke with certainty of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge
    Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge Andrew Krepinevich, Barry Watts & Robert Work 1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW, Suite 912 Washington, DC 20036 Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge by Andrew Krepinevich Barry Watts Robert Work Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments 2003 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent public policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking about defense planning and investment strategies for the 21st century. CSBA’s analytic-based research makes clear the inextricable link between defense strategies and budgets in fostering a more effective and efficient defense, and the need to transform the US military in light of the emerging military revolution. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundation, corporate and individual grants and contributions, and government contracts. 1730 Rhode Island Ave., NW Suite 912 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 http://www.csbaonline.org CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... I I. NEW CHALLENGES TO POWER PROJECTION.................................................................. 1 II. PROSPECTIVE US AIR FORCE FAILURE POINTS........................................................... 11 III. THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND ASSURED ACCESS: A CRITICAL RISK ASSESSMENT .29 IV. THE ARMY AND THE OBJECTIVE FORCE ..................................................................... 69 V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................... 93 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the Cold War, the United States defense posture called for substantial forces to be located overseas as part of a military strategy that emphasized deterrence and forward defense. Large combat formations were based in Europe and Asia. Additional forces—both land-based and maritime—were rotated periodically back to the rear area in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • This Index Lists the Army Units for Which Records Are Available at the Eisenhower Library
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS U.S. ARMY: Unit Records, 1917-1950 Linear feet: 687 Approximate number of pages: 1,300,000 The U.S. Army Unit Records collection (formerly: U.S. Army, U.S. Forces, European Theater: Selected After Action Reports, 1941-45) primarily spans the period from 1917 to 1950, with the bulk of the material covering the World War II years (1942-45). The collection is comprised of organizational and operational records and miscellaneous historical material from the files of army units that served in World War II. The collection was originally in the custody of the World War II Records Division (now the Modern Military Records Branch), National Archives and Records Service. The material was withdrawn from their holdings in 1960 and sent to the Kansas City Federal Records Center for shipment to the Eisenhower Library. The records were received by the Library from the Kansas City Records Center on June 1, 1962. Most of the collection contained formerly classified material that was bulk-declassified on June 29, 1973, under declassification project number 735035. General restrictions on the use of records in the National Archives still apply. The collection consists primarily of material from infantry, airborne, cavalry, armor, artillery, engineer, and tank destroyer units; roughly half of the collection consists of material from infantry units, division through company levels. Although the collection contains material from over 2,000 units, with each unit forming a separate series, every army unit that served in World War II is not represented. Approximately seventy-five percent of the documents are from units in the European Theater of Operations, about twenty percent from the Pacific theater, and about five percent from units that served in the western hemisphere during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Artillery Ammunition from the 1781 Siege of Star Fort
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Faculty & Staff Publications Institute of 9-2020 Artillery Ammunition from the 1781 Siege of Star Fort James B. Legg Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sciaa_staffpub Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Military History Commons Research Artillery Ammunition from the 1781 Siege of Star Fort By James B. Legg th Regular readers of Legacy, will recall that daily feature of the siege. By June 18 , the The 6-pounder was the standard field in 2018 and 2019, SCIAA Director Steve Americans were entrenched immediately caliber used by both British and American Smith conducted USC “Maymester” north of the ditch of Star Fort, but a large artillery during the Revolution. Historical archaeological field schools in and around relief force of British regular troops was sources indicate that the Americans used Star Fort, a component of the 1781 British on its way to break the siege. Greene at least four, 6-pounder field guns in defenses of Ninety Six, South Carolina, at decided to risk a direct assault on Star Fort the siege of Star Fort, while the British Ninety Six National Historic Site (Figures before giving up the siege, but the attack had only two or three 3-pounders, and 1 and 2). The work included formal met with a bloody repulse. Greene broke possibly some very light-caliber swivel excavation units, and an array of metal off the siege and withdrew the following guns. Nevertheless, we found both detector sample areas. Among our findings day, but the British then decided that the American and British 6-pounder shot in was a significant assemblage related to the post of Ninety Six was too exposed to be Star Fort.
    [Show full text]
  • FM 6-120: the Field Artillery Observation Battalion and Batteries
    DEPARTMENT OF 'I.: .:RMY FIELD MANUAL U.S. Arlmy Midt' nHiUwy tnsUtute THE FIELD ARTILLERY OBSERVATION BATTALIOn AND BATTERIES A UT~4)Ri'TY 'FiLE DEPARTMENTOF TH.E ARMY · JULY 1951 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY * JULY 1951 WARNING Authority for release of this document to a foreign government must be secured from the Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2. When this document is released to a foreign government, it is released subject to the follow- ing conditions: This information is furnished with the understanding that it will not be released to another notion without specific approval of the United States of America, Department of the Army; that it will not be used for other than military purposes; that individual or corporation rights originating in the information whether patented or not will be respected; and that the information will be afforded substantially the same degree of security as afforded by the United States of America, Department of the Army. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL FM 6-120 This manual supersedes FM 6-120, 1 May 1945 THE FIELD ARTILLERY OBSERVATION BATTALION AND BATTERIES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY · JULY 1951 United States Government Printing Office Washington: 1951 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON 25, D. C., 5 July 1951 FM 6-120 is published for the information and guid- ance of all concerned. [AG 322 (8 May 51)] BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: OFFICIAL: J. LAWTON COLLINS WM. E. BERGIN Chief of Staff Major General, USA United States Army Acting The Adjutant General DISTRIBUTION: Arm & Svc Bd (2); AFF (40); AA Comd (2); OS Maj Comd (2); Base Comd (2); MDW (2); Log Comd (2); A (20); CHQ (5); D (2); B 6 (5); R 6 (5); Bn 6 (5); C 6 (2); FC (2); Sch (2) except 6 (100); RTC 6 (50); T/O & E's, 6-76 (9); 6-77(8); 44-7(2); 44-10-1(2); 44-12(2); 44-15 (2); 44-115(2).
    [Show full text]
  • 156 Field Artillery Battalion, Unit History United States Army
    Bangor Public Library Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl World War Regimental Histories World War Collections 1946 156 Field Artillery Battalion, unit history United States Army Follow this and additional works at: http://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/ww_reg_his Recommended Citation United States Army, "156 Field Artillery Battalion, unit history" (1946). World War Regimental Histories. 17. http://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/ww_reg_his/17 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the World War Collections at Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl. It has been accepted for inclusion in World War Regimental Histories by an authorized administrator of Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TO THE MEN OF THE 71ST INFANTRY REGIMENT 1945 COPYRIGHT, 1946, BY !56TH FIELD ARTILLERY BATTALI ON Typography, engraYings and printing by Army & NaYy Publishing Company 234 Main Street Baton Rouge, Louisiana 2 156 3 Page 4 [blank] The generous efforts of these men have made this book possible. Authors . CPL. CLINTON w. MEHRING CPL. EARL K. GuLLEN CAPT. MALCOLM P. McNAIR, JR. CAPT. JoHN B. BRICKHOUSE T / SGT. EDWARD w. STEELE, JR. S / SGT. RussELL P. HALL CPL. EARL TRIBOU CAPT. MENTER G. BAKER, JR. M / S GT . RoBERT E. WALKER Art . .. SGT. ARNOLD c. BLACK Photos . .. M / SGT. RoBERT E. WALKER T I 4 RoBERT L. HoLT T I 4 HAROLD G. FRIDDELL cw I 0 EDWARD c. ALLEN CAPT. EDwARD H. DEws PFc. FRED w. ELLIS CPL. RoBERT E. HowARD U.S. ARMY SIGNAL CoRPS U.S. CoAsT GuARD Edited by .
    [Show full text]