Executive Summary Twenty-Fourth Report of The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Executive Summary Twenty-Fourth Report of The EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TWENTY-FOURTH REPORT OF THE SECRETARY GENERAL TO THE PERMANENT COUNCIL ON THE OAS MISSION TO SUPPORT THE PEACE PROCESS IN COLOMBIA The twenty-fourth report of the Secretary General to the Permanent Council on the OAS Mission to Support the Peace Process in Colombia (MAPP/OAS) is submitted pursuant to resolution CP/RES. 859 (1397/04), by which the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States (OAS) requested the Secretary General to report periodically on the work of the Mission. The mandate of the MAPP/OAS springs from the agreement concluded by the Government of the Republic of Colombia and the General Secretariat of the OAS (GS/OAS) on January 23, 2004, and resolution CP/RES. 859 (1397/04) adopted by the Permanent Council on February 6, 2004. That mandate has been expanded and extended on seven occasions,1/ most recently until December 31, 2021. The GS/OAS is grateful to the Government and people of Colombia for the confidence they have shown in the OAS by extending the MAPP/OAS mandate until 2021. The GS/OAS would also like, in particular, to express its appreciation for President Juan Manuel Santos who has worked tirelessly for peace and assisted in ensuring that the Mission can carry out its functions properly in an autonomous and independent way. That recognition extends to his entire government team. In the period from February 1 to August 31, 2017, significant progress was made in the implementation of the Final Agreement to End the Armed Conflict and Build a Stable and Lasting Peace concluded by the Colombian Government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People’s Army (FARC-EP), leading to a reduction in loss of life due to violence, opening the way for forgiveness, and laying the foundations for justice and reconciliation. However, various provisions of the Agreement relating to rural matters, fair access to land and territory, development in the areas worst affected by violence, and political participation for victims, among others, have encountered obstacles. This poses an enormous challenge for the institutional framework, since without an adequate response to address those causes and their underlying factors there could be a rapid resurgence of violence or criminality resulting from an insufficient state presence, which would set back the permanent consolidation of peace in provincial areas. The GS/OAS welcomes the resumption of the fifth cycle of talks between the Colombian Government and the ELN, which sends a clear message regarding the will on the part of both sides to end the armed conflict in Colombia and to open the way for the consolidation of full peace. The GS/OAS reiterates its support for and desire to assist the peace process underway and highlights that the current context calls for meaningful dialogue and progress on agreements in order to de-escalate the conflict and restore confidence between the parties. In that regard, it is critical to achieve a broad bilateral cease-fire with proper verification mechanisms to ensure that it encompasses provincial 1. The mandate has been expanded and extended via additional protocols to the original agreement signed on January 15, 2007, January 19, 2010, December 23, 2010, October 3, 2013, December 15, 2014, September 27, 2016, and December 19, 2017. - 2 - areas and to guarantee the continuity of progress with point 1 on societal participation in peace building. With respect to the situation in relation to violence, justice, and peace, the continuous monitoring by the MAPP/OAS has revealed persisting disputes between ELN guerrillas, organized armed groups (GAO), and organized criminal groups (GDO) vying for control of territory vacated by the FARC-EP,2/ particularly in areas where natural resources and conditions for engaging in unlawful activities are suited to their interests and which the State does not effectively control. The GS/OAS underscores the efforts of the authorities to dismantle those structures, enabling them to carry out operations whose main outcomes have been to neutralize several leaders of those groups in Caquetá, Nariño, Meta, and Bolívar. There have also been large drug seizures, such as those in May and August in Ipiales (Nariño) and Buenaventura (Valle del Cauca). Having said that, the GS/OAS considers that in order to guarantee the safety of the whole population efficiently, the State needs to strengthen its effective control of the entire country and increase the permanent presence of security forces in areas where other armed actors seek to fill the vacuum left by the FARC-EP. With regard to the territorial dynamics of the ELN, the GS/OAS finds that upon positioning itself in areas where the FARC-EP once had a presence, the ELN has generated various negative effects in terms of homicides, displacement, confinement, forcible recruitment, strengthening of its control over communities, harassment against the security forces, and hostile actions toward journalists. Those dynamics have particularly impacted departments such as Chocó, which has witnessed armed clashes between the guerrilla group and the Clan del Golfo in the Darién region. In that regard, the GS/OAS was deeply troubled by the killings in the village of El Carrá, in the Municipality of Litoral del San Juan, where four civilians were murdered after the ELN accused them of being members of the Clan del Golfo. Similar dynamics have been identified between the guerrilla group and other armed groups, such as FARC-EP dissidents in the coastal area of Nariño Department. The ELN has also harassed and directed attacks against the security forces in the municipalities of Fortul, Saravena, Arauquita and Arauca (Arauca Department); Vianí (Cundinamarca Department); La Gloria (Cesar Department); Hacarí, Teorama and Tibú (Norte de Santander Department); Samaniego and Cumbal (Nariño Department); and Sipí (Chocó Department). The GS/OAS welcomes the creation of coordination mechanisms and bodies within state institutions in order to offer security guarantees to those in local leadership roles. The GS/OAS recognizes the efforts and progress made by the National Commission for Security Guarantees, the Elite Corps of the National Police, the National Protection Unit, and other State institutions that within the framework of their official responsibilities help to advance understanding of this phenomenon and mitigate security risks in participation settings. Nonetheless, the ongoing murders, threats, attacks, forced displacement, and stigmatization of community leaders is cause for utmost concern. In that regard, the GS/OAS considers it pertinent to draw distinctions between each territorial context, and the dynamics associated with the armed conflict and social unrest. It also 2. GAO (for Grupos Armados Organizados) and GDO (for Grupos Delictivos Organizados) are terms adopted by the Colombian Government, which in Ministry of Defense Permanent Directive No. 15 of 2016 defines GAOs as groups “under the direction of a single command that exert control over an area of territory so as to enable them to engage in sustained and concerted military operations”; and GDOs as “structured groups of three or more individuals that exist over given period of time and act in concert for the purpose of committing one or more serious crimes or offenses recognized in the Palermo Convention, in order to obtain, either directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit.” It identified the Clan del Golfo, Los Pelusos, and Los Puntilleros as GAOs. It placed other, smaller groups with fewer weapons and less capacity to make war, such as Los Rastrojos, La Constru, and La Empresa, among many others, in the GDO category. - 3 - considers it relevant to identify the social, cultural, political, and economic drivers that lead to attacks on community leaders in order to adequately address that phenomenon, as well as to move forward with inquiries that do not stop at identifying the perpetrators, but also investigate possible masterminds. The national crop substitution program (Programa Nacional Integral de Sustitución de Cultivos de Uso Ilícito – PNIS) has been advancing in provincial areas in a bid to accomplish the goals set by the Government. In that context, as of August 31, 2017, the Crop Substitution Department (Dirección para la Sustitución de Cultivos Ilícitos) of the Office of the Advisor for the Post-Conflict (Alta Consejería para el Posconflicto) initiated the rollout of the PNIS by organizing 860 municipal awareness drives and concluding 82 collective voluntary substitution agreements in 85 municipalities. The agreements cover approximately 127,000 families and 85,000 to 90,000 hectares under illicit crops. This approach has generated high expectations as well as an opportunity for families that make their livelihood from illicit crops to obtain access to mechanisms that would enable them to change their sources of income. Having said that, the GS/OAS, through the MAPP/OAS, has learned that local communities have little faith in the program’s success, given the slow pace of its implementation and the presence of illegal armed actors who drive the illicit economies and threaten those who lead voluntary crop substitution processes. Several aspects relating to the implementation of the PNIS, such as the need for comprehensive rural reform, require a coordinated institutional framework in order to address issues such as access to land and peasant communities settling on collective lands belonging to Afro- Colombian communities, indigenous reservations, national parks, and unused State-owned land. In addition, clear rules are needed on aspects such as the maximum number of hectares to be substituted per household, the distinction between small and large farmers, and the linkage to substitution programs of non-farming individuals and families that make their living from the drug production chain,3/ among other issues. As regards the forcible eradication strategy being implemented by the security forces, according to reports from the Ministry of Defense, it is advancing at a good pace, as evinced by the fact that it has surpassed the annual target for 2017.
Recommended publications
  • Pdf | 271.02 Kb
    United Nations S/2019/1017 Security Council Distr.: General 31 December 2019 Original: English Children and armed conflict in Colombia Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report, submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1612 (2005) and subsequent resolutions, is the fourth report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict in Colombia and covers the period from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2019. The report provides information on the six grave violations against children, on parties to conflict responsible, where identified, and on progress made in the protection of children affected by armed conflict. The reporting period was marked by the implementation of the Final Agreement for Ending the Conflict and Building a Stable and Lasting Peace (S/2017/272, annex II) between the Government of Colombia and the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia-Ejército del Pueblo (FARC-EP), which put an end to a five-decade-long conflict. A decrease in the total number of grave violations against children was documented and can be explained in part by the signature of the peace agreement and the subsequent demobilization of the largest armed group in the country. Over the same period, however, other armed groups expanded their territorial presence, including in areas vacated by FARC-EP, and FARC-EP dissident groups emerged. These developments have continued to expose children to grave violations, in particular recruitment and use and sexual violence. Highlighted in the report are the efforts made by the Government of Colombia to strengthen the framework to respond to, end and prevent grave violations against children, including through prevention strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • FULLTEXT01.Pdf
    1 Cover photo: José Ramón Gomez, Arauca, 2012 Front page designed by: Manuela Giraldo 'When an Indigenous People disappears, a whole world is extinguished forever, along with its culture, spirituality, language, ancestral knowledge and traditional practices ... The survival of Indigenous Peoples with dignity is all in our hands.” National Indigenous Organization of Colombia (ONIC) "We are not myths of the past neither ruins in the jungle. We are people and we want to be respected…” Rigoberta Menchu Tum 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 5 PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 7 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Aim and Research Question ............................................................................................ 10 1.2 Theoretical Framework ................................................................................................... 10 1.2.1 Structural Violence ................................................................................................ 11 1.2.2 Civilians Targeted by GAO ML..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Colombia Page 1 of 21
    Colombia Page 1 of 21 Colombia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 6, 2007 Colombia is a constitutional, multiparty democracy with a population of approximately 42 million. On May 28, independent presidential candidate Alvaro Uribe was reelected in elections that were considered generally free and fair. The 42-year internal armed conflict continued between the government and terrorist organizations, particularly the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the National Liberation Army (ELN). .The United Self Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC) was demobilized by August, but renegade AUC members who did not demobilize, or who demobilized but later abandoned the peace process, remained the object of military action. While civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces, there were instances in which elements of the security forces acted in violation of state policy. Although serious problems remained, the government's respect for human rights continued to improve, which was particularly evident in actions undertaken by the government's security forces and in demobilization negotiations with the AUC. The following societal problems and governmental human rights abuses were reported during the year: unlawful and extrajudicial killings; forced disappearances; insubordinate military collaboration with criminal groups; torture and mistreatment of detainees; overcrowded and insecure prisons; arbitrary arrest; high number of
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Civilians in Colombia's Internal Armed
    ‘ L E A V E U S I N P E A C E ’ T LEAVE US IN A ‘ R G E T I N G C I V I L I A N S PEA CE’ I N C O TARG ETING CIVILIANS L O M B I A IN COL OM BIA S INTERNAL ’ S ’ I N T E R ARMED CONFL IC T N A L A R M E D C O N F L I C ‘LEAVE US IN PEACE’ T TARGETING CIVILIANS IN COLOMBIA ’S INTERNAL ARMED CONFLICT “Leave us in peace!” – Targeting civilians in Colombia’s internal armed conflict describes how the lives of millions of Colombians continue to be devastated by a conflict which has now lasted for more than 40 years. It also shows that the government’s claim that the country is marching resolutely towards peace does not reflect the reality of continued A M violence for many Colombians. N E S T Y At the heart of this report are the stories of Indigenous communities I N T decimated by the conflict, of Afro-descendant families expelled from E R their homes, of women raped and of children blown apart by landmines. N A The report also bears witness to the determination and resilience of T I O communities defending their right not to be drawn into the conflict. N A L A blueprint for finding a lasting solution to the crisis in Colombia was put forward by the UN more than 10 years ago. However, the UN’s recommendations have persistently been ignored both by successive Colombian governments and by guerrilla groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela Regional Migration Crisis: Who Are the Children Most at Risk?
    FINAL REPORT VENEZUELA REGIONAL MIGRATION CRISIS: WHO ARE THE CHILDREN MOST AT RISK? An analysis of shifting vulnerabilities in the border departments of Colombia (Arauca and La Guajira) Save the Children Colombia March 2019 Foreword Save the Children is strongly involved in the humanitarian response in Colombia as well as in For over 30 years, Save the Children Colombia has other neighbouring countries. Across the region, we been responding to emergencies related to the internal are committed to reach every last child and to unveil armed conflict and natural disasters. For the first time, the current gaps to the accomplishment of their rights. the organisation is responding to an international That is why we commissioned a study identifying who migration crisis of unprecedented proportions. Since were the children most at risk in the context of this 2015, our teams have reached pregnant adolescents, particular crisis, focusing on the two border departments mothers forced to bury their child along the way to of Colombia (Arauca and La Guajira). In our day-to-day Colombia, young adults at risk of being recruited by work, we observe that migratory patterns are dynamic, armed groups, and entire families who crossed the and that populations sometimes present cumulative layers border from Venezuela with little but hope. Economic of vulnerability. Save the Children needed a systematic and institutional challenges, as well as repeated exposure analysis of the impact of the crisis on children, including to violence, more often than not await Venezuelans and with a gender lens, with concrete recommendations Colombian returnees in countries to which they have to inform our programmes and that of our partners.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOTA COLOMBIANA ISSN Impreso 0124-5376 Volumen 20 · Número 1 · Enero-Junio De 2019 ISSN Digital 2539-200X DOI 10.21068/C001
    BIOTA COLOMBIANA ISSN impreso 0124-5376 Volumen 20 · Número 1 · Enero-junio de 2019 ISSN digital 2539-200X DOI 10.21068/c001 Atropellamiento vial de fauna silvestre en la Troncal del Caribe Amaryllidaceae en Colombia Adiciones al inventario de copépodos de Colombia Nuevos registros de avispas en la región del Orinoco Herpetofauna de San José del Guaviare Escarabajos estercoleros en Aves en los páramos de Antioquia Oglán Alto, Ecuador y el complejo de Chingaza Biota Colombiana es una revista científica, periódica-semestral, Comité Directivo / Steering Committee que publica artículos originales y ensayos sobre la biodiversi- Brigitte L. G. Baptiste Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos dad de la región neotropical, con énfasis en Colombia y países Alexander von Humboldt vecinos, arbitrados mínimo por dos evaluadores externos. In- M. Gonzalo Andrade Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia cluye temas relativos a botánica, zoología, ecología, biología, Francisco A. Arias Isaza Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras limnología, conservación, manejo de recursos y uso de la bio- “José Benito Vives De Andréis” - Invemar diversidad. El envío de un manuscrito implica la declaración Charlotte Taylor Missouri Botanical Garden explícita por parte del (los) autor (es) de que este no ha sido previamente publicado, ni aceptado para su publicación en otra Editor / Editor revista u otro órgano de difusión científica. El proceso de arbi- Rodrigo Bernal Independiente traje tiene una duración mínima de tres a cuatro meses a partir Editor de artículos de datos / Data papers Editor de la recepción del artículo por parte de Biota Colombiana. To- Dairo Escobar Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos das las contribuciones son de la entera responsabilidad de sus Alexander von Humboldt autores y no del Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Bioló- Asistente editorial / Editorial assistant gicos Alexander von Humboldt, ni de la revista o sus editores.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Bulletin Colombia Issue 04 | 01 - 30 April 2012
    Humanitarian Bulletin Colombia Issue 04 | 01 - 30 April 2012 In this issue Mass displacement rises 49% P.1 HIGHLIGHTS Hostilities hinder health assistance P.2 • UN Secretary-General issues Forced recruitment of children P.3 report on children adn armed conflict. More than 70,000 affected by rains P.5 Floods in San Estanilao, Bolívar COOPI / Daniel Perisco • Mass displacement rises by 49% in April. Clashes along the Pacific Coast exacerbate New UN report emphasizes plight of children in vulnerabilities. armed conflict • Hostilities drop but impact on civilians remains dire. Indigenous and Afro-Colombian children suffer disproportionately • GoC sets conditions to On 6 March, the UN Secretary-General issued his second report on children in armed strengthen risk management conflict in Colombia. The report highlights the persistence of grave violations against chil- and risk reduction. dren from January 2009 to August 2011 – including recruitment of children by non-State armed groups, use by all armed groups, killing and maiming, sexual violence, abductions, attacks on schools and hospitals, and the denial of humanitarian access. These violations FIGURES tend to be under-reported and disproportionately affect indigenous and Afro-Colombian # of IDPs in children. The report goes on to highlight Government efforts to address the situation fol- 2011 (NGO 259.146 lowing previous UN recommendations. Colombia is not formally on the Security Council sources) agenda and has voluntarily agreed to establish reporting and monitoring on children in Children victims armed conflict. A recent report from Watchlist also calls the attention on these violations. of APM/UXO in 34 2012 Both reports highlight the need to provide equal assistance and protection to children ERF 2012 1.6m separated from post-demobilization armed groups -considered as criminal groups by the Goverment-.
    [Show full text]
  • BOLETÍN CIENTÍFICO CENTRO DE MUSEOS MUSEO DE HISTORIA NATURAL Vol
    BOLETÍN CIENTÍFICO CENTRO DE MUSEOS MUSEO DE HISTORIA NATURAL Vol. 22 No. 2 SCIENTIFIC BULLETIN MUSEUM CENTER NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM Vol. 22 No. 2 bol.cient.mus.his.nat. Manizales (Colombia) Vol. 22 No. 2 222 p. julio-diciembre ISSN 0123-3068 ISSN: 2462-8190 de 2018 (Impreso) (En línea) ISSN 0123–3068 (Impreso) ISSN: 2462-8190 (En línea) -Fundada en 1995- BOLETÍN CIENTÍFICO Nueva periodicidad semestral CENTRO DE MUSEOS Tiraje 150 ejemplares Vol. 22 No. 2, 222 p. MUSEO DE HISTORIA NATURAL julio-diciembre, 2018 Manizales - Colombia Rector Alejandro Ceballos Márquez Vicerrector Académico Marco Tulio Jaramillo Salazar Vicerrectora de Investigaciones y Postgrados Luisa Fernanda Giraldo Zuluaga Vicerrector Administrativo Manuel Humberto Jiménez Ramírez Vicerrectora de Proyección Universitaria Patricia Salazar Villegas Decano Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Marco Tulio Jaramillo Salazar Centro de Museos Olga Lucía Hurtado Boletín Científico Revista especializada en estudios Centro de Museos de Historia Natural y áreas Museo de Historia Natural biológicas afines. Director Julián A. Salazar E. Médico Veterinario & Zootecnista (MVZ). Universidad de Caldas, Centro de Museos. Indexada por Publindex Categoría A2 Zoological Record SciELO Index Copernicus Scopus Cómite Editorial Cómite Internacional Ricardo Walker Ángel L. Viloria Investigador, Fundador Boletín Biólogo-Zoólogo, Ph.D., Centro Científico Museo de Historia de Ecología, IVIC, Venezuela Natural, Universidad de Caldas Tomasz Pyrcz Luis Carlos Pardo-Locarno Entomólogo, Ph.D., Museo de Ingeniero Agronómo, Ph.D., MSc., Zoología Universidad Jaguellónica, CIAT Palmira, Valle Polonia John Harold Castaño Zsolt Bálint MSc. Programa Biología, Biologo, Ph.D., Museo de Historia Universidad de Caldas Natural de Budapest, Hungría Luís M. Constantino Carlos López Vaamonde Entomólogo, MSc., Centro Ingeniero Agrónomo, Entomólogo, de Investigaciones para el café MSc., Ph.D., BSc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet #1, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2020 February 12, 2020
    VENEZUELA REGIONAL CRISIS FACT SHEET #1, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2020 FEBRUARY 12, 2020 HUMANITARIAN FUNDING NUMBERS AT HIGHLIGHTS A GLANCE FOR THE VENEZUELA REGIONAL CRISIS Government of Colombia grants RESPONSE IN FYs 2017–2019 citizenship to children born in Colombia to Venezuelan parents USAID/OFDA1 $117,078,942 4.8 Measles-related deaths in Venezuela USAID/FFP2 $147,117,407 decline by 96 percent in 2019 following million country-wide vaccination campaign State/PRM3 $208,206,327 Estimated Number of Government of Brazil grants refugee Venezuelan Migrants and status to 37,000 Venezuelans Refugees $472,402,676 R4V – February 2020 6.5 million KEY DEVELOPMENTS The 2020 Global Humanitarian Overview, released by the UN in December, requests Projected Number of Venezuelan Migrants and $2.1 billion to support the humanitarian response for the Venezuela regional crisis in Refugees by End of 2020 2020. The appeal includes $750 million for humanitarian efforts in Venezuela to reach R4V – November 2019 3.5 million of the estimated 7 million people in need, and $1.35 billion to reach approximately 4 million crisis-affected individuals across 17 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, as outlined in the 2020 Regional Refugee and Migrant Response Plan $750 for Refugees and Migrants from Venezuela (RMRP). The number of measles-related deaths in Venezuela declined by 96 percent in 2019 million compared to the previous year, following a country-wide vaccination campaign between Funding Requirement for April 2018 and July 2019 that reached nearly 9 million children ages 6 months–15 years, 2020 Humanitarian with funding from USAID/OFDA and other donors.
    [Show full text]
  • (National Liberation Army) in Colombia and Venezuela R
    The Reinforcing Activities of the ELN(National Liberation Army) in Colombia and Venezuela R. EVAN ELLIS, PHD* n the past five years, a confluence of events in Colombia and Venezuela have empowered the National Liberation Army (ELN) to become a far more dan- Igerous and intractable threat to both countries, and the region. The reinforc- ing effects of the partial demobilization the rival Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC),1 a dramatic expansion in coca production in Columbia,2 a permissive environment for the ELN in neighboring Venezuela,3 plus opportuni- ties arising out of that nation’s criminal economy and refugee crisis, have together allowed the organization to become larger, better funded, and more difficult to dislodge. In the process, the organization has begun to displace a range of key adversaries in both Colombia and Venezuela, increase its territorial control, play an expanded role in transnational criminal activities from drugs and gasoline smuggling to mining to extortion, impacting not only the security of Colombia, but the future of Venezuela, as well as facilitating ever greater flows of narcotics and refugees that impact Brazil, the Caribbean, Central America and beyond. ELN activities in Colombia and Venezuela countries are complimentary, al- though its actual activities differ from its public posture in both. In Colombia, the group seeks the overthrow of the government through revolutionary action,4 al- though its armed actions are limited relative to its fundraising through illicit ac- tivities. In Venezuela, the group does not openly seek the government’s downfall, and collaborates with that nation’s political leadership and local military commanders,5 as the ELN it uses the country as a strategic safe zone and concen- trates on the generation of revenue through illicit activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Evaluation Colombia Complexity-Aware M&E
    PHOTO: JUAN RUIZ DEVELOPMENTAL EVALUATION COLOMBIA COMPLEXITY-AWARE M&E Fifth Iteration CONTRACT NO. AID-OAA-I-15-00017, ORDER NO. AID-514-TO-17-00010 DISCLAIMER: This is an external evaluation. The view expressed in this document are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Submitted to: USAID/Colombia Submitted January 2021 Contractor: Democracy International, Inc. 7600 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1010 Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: 301-961-1660 www.democracyinternational.com EXTENDED SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Under its contract with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Democracy International (DI) is responsible for conducting the Complexity-Aware Monitoring and Evaluation (C-AME) activity to monitor and evaluate the USAID/Colombia Reconciliation Activity, PAR (Programa de Alianzas para la Reconciliación), implemented by ACDI/VOCA. As part of this activity, DI presents in this document the results of the fifth iteration of the developmental evaluation (DE). The DE is a systematic effort to track and analyze program results that emerge under conditions of complexity, to document and interpret the dynamics, interactions, and interdependencies that occur and inform results during the implementation of PAR. This DE report package includes three documents: 1) an extended executive summary, which presents an overview of the analysis from primary and secondary data collection used to address the core questions of this evaluation, along with recommendations and lessons for the implementation and programmatic levels. 2) an annex with the detailed analysis of implementation and context (including a separate section on gender issues); the introductory section of this annex includes details about the evaluation scope, methodology, and an overview of the context trends in the Colombia-Venezuela border municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Advice Colombia – COL38771 – M19– Bucaramanga
    Country Advice Colombia Colombia – COL38771 – M19– Bucaramanga – Valledupar – Arjona Cesar – Pailitas – Barranquilla 8 June 2011 1. Can you please confirm that there have been no significant changes to the information contained in COL38612 dated 20 April 2011? There have been no significant changes to the information contained in Country Advice COL38612 of 20 April 2011.1 More recent reports include the recently released Amnesty International 2011 report on Colombia, which refers to guerrilla groups, paramilitaries and the security forces in Colombia being “responsible for serious and widespread human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law, including war crimes.” The parties to the conflict did not distinguish between civilians and combatants, resulting in unlawful killings, forced displacement, kidnappings and enforced disappearances. The FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) and the smaller National Liberation Army (Ejército de Liberación Nacional, ELN) were reported to have “committed serious human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law, including unlawful killings, hostage-taking and the recruitment of children.” FARC in particular had “carried out indiscriminate attacks in which civilians were put at risk through the use of low-precision explosive devices.” Paramilitaries continued to kill civilians, recruit children, threaten and kill social leaders and human rights defenders, and carry out acts of “social cleansing”. These groups had continued to expand and become organisationally more sophisticated. There was continuing collusion with the security forces in many parts of the country.2 On 25 May 2011, it was reported that Colombia had issued a new security plan, aimed at breaking up criminal gangs, minimising drug trafficking and improving security in the next three years.
    [Show full text]