2004 SÖDERKÖPING PROCESS CLUSTER MEETINGS: Meeting Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2004 SÖDERKÖPING PROCESS CLUSTER MEETINGS: Meeting Of Cross-Border Co-operation / Söderköping Process 2004 SÖDERKÖPING PROCESS CLUSTER MEETINGS: Meeting of the Northern Cluster, Minsk, Belarus, 9–10 September 2004 Meeting of the Central and Southern Cluster, Budapest, Hungary, 28–29 October 2004 This project is funded by the This project is implemented The United Nations High The International Organisation for European Union by the Swedish Migration Board Commissioner for Refugees is a Migration is a project partner project partner Compiled and edited by Myroslava Korenevych, External Relations Expert, Cross-Border Co-operation / Söderköping Process Secretariat Contact: Cross-Border Co-operation Process Secretariat 32-A Sichnevoho povstannya St., Kyiv, 01015, Ukraine Tel: + 380 44 254 5346/47 Fax: + 380 44 288 9850 E-mail: [email protected] www.sodrkoping.org.ua © 2005 European Commission All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored on a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. It presents the views of its authors and in no way constitutes any obligation or expresses the official position or views of the European Commission, donor governments, UNHCR, IOM or CBCP Secretariat. 2 CONTENTS FOREWORD 5 PART I. MEETING OF THE NORTHERN CLUSTER, Minsk, Belarus, 9-10 September 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 SUGGESTIONS FOR FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES 17 AGENDA 20 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 22 PART II. MEETING OF THE CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN CLUSTER, Budapest, Hungary, 28-29 October 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 25 SUGGESTIONS FOR FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES 36 AGENDA 38 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 40 PART III. PRESENTATIONS UPDATE ON THE MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SÖDERKÖPING PROCESS AND THE ACTIVITIES OF THE CBCP SECRETARIAT SINCE THE LAST SENIOR LEVEL REVIEW MEETING, Myroslava Korenevych, External Relations Expert, Cross-Border Co-operation Process Secretariat 43 UPDATE ON THE NORMATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LEGISLATION OF THE NORTHERN CLUSTER COUNTRIES, Gaspar Bergman, Head, Cross-Border Co-operation Process Secretariat 45 LEGISLATIVE AND ADIMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN CLUSTER COUNTRIES OF THE SÖDERKÖPING PROCESS: From October 2003 till present, Gaspar Bergman, Myroslava Korenevych, Cross-Border Co-operation Process Secretariat 48 THE MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE EU POLICIES AND PRACTICES ON ASYLUM AND MIGRATION: Summary of presentations made in Minsk, September 2004, and Budapest, October 2004, Annabelle Roig, Liaison Officer with the EU Institutions, UNHCR Regional Representation in Belgium 53 UKRAINE’S IRREGULAR MIGRANTS – RECEPTION AND RETURN, Chris Petch, Operations Officer, IOM Mission on Ukraine 58 UKRAINE’S EXPERIENCE WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU ACTION PLAN IN THE FIELD OF BORDER MANAGEMENT IN 2004, Andriy Fedoseev, Chief of Section, Administration of State Border Guard Service of Ukraine 61 3 SUMMARY OF THE TACIS PROJECT KI 03-13 “THE АSSISTANCE TO THE LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS IN UKRAINE IN THE SPHERE OF MIGRATION AND REFUGEES’ PROTECTION ACCORDING TO THE NORMS AND STANDARDS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION”, Janas Vidickas, Deputy Director of Migration Department, Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Lithuania 62 ANNEXES ANNEX I. CONVENTION PLUS AT A GLANCE, Convention Plus Unit, UNHCR HQ 64 ANNEX II. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE STATE BORDER GUARD SERVICE OF UKRAINE AND THE STATE BORDER GUARD OF THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA 68 ANNEX III. SUMMARY OF THE CROSS-REGIONAL CO-OPERATION PROJECT BETWEEN UKRAINIAN, HUNGARIAN AND SLOVAK ORGANISATIONS INVOLVED IN REFUGEE PROTECTION, Albert Pirchak, Director, NEEKA 70 4 FOREWORD This publication is a compilation of the minutes and presentations of the meetings of the Northern Cluster and the Central and Southern Cluster countries of the Söderköping process, which took place in 2004. The meetings served as a follow-up to recent EU enlargement and updated the asylum, migration and border guard officials and representatives of NGOs as well as international organisations on the developments that had taken place in the Eastern and Central European countries in this respect. The meetings of the Northern Cluster and Central and Southern Cluster countries, when compared to previous events held within the Söderköping process, took a new focus. The participating countries made an attempt to look into possible ways of sharing with Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus, the experience gained by the newly acceded EU Member States and the candidate country with aligning their migration legislation and practices with the EU Acquis in the process of accession. And this approach will further be developed and deepened, allowing the participating countries to take initiative in identifying the issues of concern and lead the process of finding appropriate solutions. The ideas and suggestions expressed by the participants are being followed-up by the Cross-Border Co- operation/Söderköping Process Secretariat and will be presented at the Senior Level Review Meeting in May 2005, in the interests of formulating specific steps that can be taken by the participating countries – aimed at transposing specific EU standards and legal norms into the legislation of Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova on asylum, migration and border management. Cross-Border Co-operation / Söderköping Process Secretariat 5 PART I. MEETING OF THE NORTHERN CLUSTER Minsk, Belarus, 9-10 September 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background On 9-10 September 2004, the European Commission (EC), the Swedish Migration Board (SMB), the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) with the support of the Cross-Border Co-operation/Söderköping process (CBCP) Secretariat convened a meeting of the Northern cluster countries of the Söderköping Process in Minsk, Belarus. Asylum, migration, border guard officials and representatives of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) from Belarus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine, as well as representatives of international organisations participated in the meeting. The co-chairs were the SMB, IOM and UNHCR. Purpose of the Meeting The meeting aimed to: • analyse consequences of the establishment of the new EU Eastern border; • provide an update on the most recent developments in the EU asylum and migration legislation; • collect ideas for future co-operation within the Söderköping process and consider proposals for joint actions at the operational level. Opening Remarks Mr. Sergey Matus, Deputy Head, Division for Migration, Refugees and Asylum, Department for Citizenship and Migration, Ministry of Interior of Belarus, Mr. Bernhard Bogensperger, Attache, Delegation of the European Commission to Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus, Mr. Göran Larsson, Head of Department, Swedish Migration Board, Mr. Guy Ouellet, Regional Representative, UNHCR Regional Representation for Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus, and Mr. Andreas Halbach, Regional Representative, IOM Vienna, welcomed the participants. In his opening remarks, Mr. Sergey Matus stressed the fact that Belarus was chosen as a venue for the Northern cluster meeting, and that this in turn represents an ‘act of trust’ to Belarus. Mr. Bogensperger noted that the Northern cluster meeting is ‘historic’ in the discourse of the enlarged EU. He stressed that the EU enlargement aims to reinforce the EU and partner countries. The European Neighbourhood Policy is an instrument by virtue of which such benefits of enlargement as strengthening stability, security, and well-being of all concerned are shared. Asylum and migration issues make an important part of them. In the context of the Söderköping process, the principle of joint ownership should be observed, as the EU aims to commit to certain objectives and actions to bring countries closer in certain priority fields in order to avoid new dividing lines. Mr. Larsson noted that the Northern cluster meeting represents a new phase in the Söderköping process which reflects a more concrete and practical approach to cross-border co-operation. Mr. Ouellet welcomed the participants and congratulated the delegates of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia with EU accession. He stressed the importance of understanding the reality of the new border and the fact that neighbouring countries face new challenges. In this context, one of the key elements of the Söderköping process is the transfer of experience from the recently acceded EU Member States to Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova. Mr. Halbach provided an overview of the Söderköping process and the evolution of alternative forms of co-operation, which exert a particular impact on the Newly Independent States (NIS). 6 PART I. MEETING OF THE NORTHERN CLUSTER, Minsk, Belarus, 9-10 September 2004 Presentations An update on the most recent developments in the Söderköping process and the activities of the CBCP Secretariat since the last Senior Level Review Meeting (17 October 2003) was presented by Ms. Myroslava Korenevych, CBCP Secretariat. The Secretariat was actively promoting the process through its information activities, which included briefings for embassies and international organisations, the quarterly newsletter and other publications aimed at collecting and streamlining the relevant information and creating a “database” of the Söderköping process. Currently, the Secretariat is creating a website. The Secretariat has also been
Recommended publications
  • On the State Border Service of Ukraine
    On the State Border Service of Ukraine (Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR), 2003, N 27, st.208) (As amended in accordance with the Laws N 965-IV ( 965-15 ) Dated 19.06.2003, VVR, 2003, N 45, st.357 N 2505-IV ( 2505-15 ) On 25.03.2005, VVR, 2005, N 17, N 18-19, st.267 N 3200-IV ( 3200-15 ) On 15.12.2005, VVR, 2006, N 14, st.116 N 328-V ( 328-16 ) Dated 03.11.2006, VVR, 2006, N 51, st.519 N 489-V ( 489-16 ) Dated 19.12.2006, VVR, 2007, N 7-8, st.66 N 1014-V ( 1014-16 ) Dated 11.05.2007, VVR, 2007, N 33, st.442 N 107-VI ( 107-17 ) Dated 28.12.2007, VVR, 2008, N 5-6, N 7-8, st.78 - Changes are on December 31, 2008 N 289-VI ( 289-17 ) Dated 20.05.2008, VVR, 2008, N 26, st.243) (In addition, see. Decision of the Constitutional Court N 10-rp/2008 ( v010p710-08 ) Dated 22.05.2008) (As amended in accordance with the Laws N 586-VI ( 586-17 ) Dated 24.09.2008, VVR, 2009, N 10-11, st.137 N 884-VI ( 884-17 ) Dated 15.01.2009, VVR, 2009, N 24, st.298 N 1710-VI ( 1710-17 ) Dated 05.11.2009) (Document obtained from official sources - http://zakon.rada.gov.ua) This Law in accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine ( 254k/96-VR ) defines the legal basis and organization of the State Border Service of Ukraine and its overall structure, size, functions and powers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project "Transnistrian Problem: View from Ukraine"
    Strategic and Security Studies Group TRANSNISTRIAN PROBLEM: a view from Ukraine KYIV 2009 STRATEGIC AND SECURITY STUDIES GROUP The publication contains the results of the research of interstate relations between Ukraine and Moldova through the lens of Transnistrian settlement problem. The focal points of the research are the assessment of cooperation between two states, issues of citizenship, border regime, interethnic relations, NGOs partnership etc. The publication is aimed at enhancing the dialogue of Ukrainian and Moldovan experts and politicians. It was prepared within the project “Transnistrian problem: a view from Ukraine” supported by International Renaissance Foundation (project manager – O.Basarab). Chapters 14 and 16 were prepared with the kind assistance of Open Ukraine Foundation and Victor Pinchuk Foundation. The project was implemented by “Strategic and Security Studies Group” (SSSG) - non-governmental organization, which has been working since 2003 in the field of: National security policy and sustainable development of Ukraine International relations and foreign policy of Ukraine Regional and international security European political and integration processes Euro Atlantic dialogue and integration SSSG supports transparency in decision-making process and wider discussion regarding foreign, security and defense policy policy of Ukraine and to promotes democratic changes in society. Our contacts: Info[a]gsbs.org.ua www.gsbs.org.ua + 38 (044) 491 - 3830 Publication edited by S. GERASYMCHUK Authors: N. BELITSER (Pylyp Orlyk Institute for Democracy) S. GERASYMCHUK (Strategic and Security Studies Group) O. GRYTSENKO (Strategic and Security Studies Group) Y. DOVGOPOL (Independent expert) Z. ZHMINKO (Strategic and Security Studies Group) Y. MATIYCHYK (Strategic and Security Studies Group) O. SUSHKO (Institute of Euro-atlantic Cooperation) O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Customs Code of Ukraine
    The Customs Code of Ukraine (SECTION 1 - SECTION IV) As amended by laws of Ukraine No.291-IV of November 28, 2002 No.348-IV of December 24, 2002 The Customs Code of Ukraine defines the foundation and implementation principles of customs practice in Ukraine, and regulates economic, organizational, legal, personnel and social aspects of the activities of the customs service of Ukraine. The Code aims to secure the protection of Ukraine's economic interests, to create favorable conditions for the development of its economy, to protect the rights and interests of subjects of entrepreneurial activity and citizens, as well as to ensure adherence to Ukrainian customs- related legislation. SECTION 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter 1. THE FOUNDATIONS OF CUSTOMS PRACTICE Article 1. Definition of Basic Terms and Concepts The terms and concepts listed below are used in this Code in the following meaning: 1) currency values: currency of Ukraine - token money in the form of bank notes, treasury notes, coins and other forms, which are in circulation and are legal tender on the territory of Ukraine, as well as those withdrawn or being withdrawn from circulation, but are subject to exchange for token money in circulation; foreign currency – foreign token money in the form of bank notes, treasury notes and coins, which are in circulation and are legal tender on the territory of the respective foreign state, as well as those withdrawn or being withdrawn from circulation, but are subject to exchange for token money in circulation; payment documents and other securities (shares , bonds, coupons thereto, bills of exchange (promissory notes), bills of debt, letters of credit, checks, banker’s order , certificates of deposit, other financial or bank documents), denominated in the Ukrainian currency, foreign currency or bank metals; bank metals – gold, silver, platinum, metals of the platinum group, refined (affinaged) to the highest grades in accordance with world standards, in ingots and powder, which possess certificates of quality, as well as coins, manufactured of precious metals.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Ukraine
    CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 28, 1996 Amended by the Laws of Ukraine № 2222-IV dated December 8, 2004, № 2952-VI dated February 1, 2011, № 586-VII dated September 19, 2013, № 742-VII dated February 21, 2014, № 1401-VIII dated June 2, 2016 № 2680-VIII dated February 7, 2019 The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, on behalf of the Ukrainian people - citizens of Ukraine of all nationalities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, based on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and on the right to self-determination realised by the Ukrainian nation, all the Ukrainian people, providing for the guarantee of human rights and freedoms and of the worthy conditions of human life, caring for the strengthening of civil harmony on Ukrainian soil, and confirming the European identity of the Ukrainian people and the irreversibility of the European and Euro-Atlantic course of Ukraine, striving to develop and strengthen a democratic, social, law-based state, aware of responsibility before God, our own conscience, past, present and future generations, guided by the Act of Declaration of the Independence of Ukraine of August 24, 1991, approved by the national vote on December 1, 1991, adopts this Constitution - the Fundamental Law of Ukraine. Chapter I General Principles Article 1 Ukraine is a sovereign and independent, democratic, social, law-based state. Article 2 The sovereignty of Ukraine extends throughout its entire territory. Ukraine is a unitary state. The territory of Ukraine within its present border is indivisible and inviolable. Article 3 The human being, his or her life and health, honour and dignity, inviolability and security are recognised in Ukraine as the highest social value.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine – Russia: Relationships 2014 – Present
    Ukraine – Russia: Relationships 2014 – present Simulation of Negotiations: Ukraine-Russia-European Union Relations Dr. Vitalijs Butenko Dr. Sibylle Zürcher NECOM | 07.03.2017 | 1 1. Introduction NECOM | 07.03.2017 | 2 Ukraine Situation as of 2013: - Form of government: Semi-presidential republic - Administrative units: - 24 regions (“oblast”) - 2 cities of republican subordination (Kiev and Sevastopol) - Autonomous Republic of Crimea - Population*: - 48.4 m (2001 census) - 42.5 m (2016 estimate) - GDP (current prices)*: - $179.5 b (2013) - $87.2 b (2016 estimate) - Security: - 250’000 army personnel0 - Following Budapest agreement in 1994 the nuclear arsenal is removed to Russia in exchange for assurances against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine and admission to Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT). NECOM | 07.03.2017 | 3 * Note from IMF: 2013 data excludes Crimea and Sevastopol for comparison purposes with 2014 data. 2. Background on the crisis in Ukraine 5. Sept. 2014: Minsk protocol, Convoy cease fire Nov 2013 – Sept 2014 Odessa Dec 2014-Feb Conflict intensity 2015: Debaltseve “Pocket” War Mar. 2014: MH17 Civil war erupts in Luhansk and Donetsk regions 12. Sept. 2014: Ratification of the Mar. 2014: UKR-EU association US and EU agreement Crisis sanctions 21 Feb. 2014: Mar. 2014: Crisis settlement deal Incorporation of Crimea by Russia 22-23 Feb. 2014: Yanukovitch leaves Ukraine; Maidan leaders take over Open the government conflict 26. Sept. 2014 Another gas- Nov. 2013: UKR: repays $3.1 bn price crisis Euromaidan debt in steps UKR-RUS, EU begins RUS: Resumes as mediator supply at price $385 per 1,000 m2 Unstable peace StableNov.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT NAFTOGAZ FINANCIAL INDICATORS NAFTOGAZ GROUP NET CONTRIBUTIONS to the STATE BUDGET 2016 2016, UAH Billion in 20142016, UAH BILLION
    Ukrnafta (50%+1 share) Oil and gas production Naftogaz of Ukraine Ukrtransnafta (100%) NAFTOGAZ Headquarters, trading Oil transmission and storage Ukrgazvydobuvannya (100%) Ukrtatnafta (43 %) GROUP Oil and gas upstream GROUP Oil refining and storage Ukrtransgaz (100%) Petrosannan Company (JV, Egypt) STRUCTURE Oil and gas production Gas transmission and storage OIL Ukrspetstransgaz (100%) Zakordonnaftogaz (100%) LHG railway transportation GAS 6% Oil and gas production revenues Gas of Ukraine (100%) Retail supply until 2012 92% revenues OTHER Ukravtogaz (100%) Naukanaftogaz (100%) CNG retail (stations) 2% Research and development revenues Naftogaz Trading Europe S.A. (100%) (former Naftogaz Overseas S.A.) Vuhlesyntezgaz of Ukraine (100%) Development of gas replacement projects Trading (Geneva) Kirovohradgaz (51%) LIKVO (100%) Gas distribution and supply Prevention of emergencies Chornomornaftogaz* (100%) Naftogazbezpeka (100%) Oil and gas upstream Security services Ukrnaftogazkomplekt (100%) Supply of equipment Naftogazobslugovuvannia (100%) Services Gas value chain: 92% of the group revenues Oil value chain: 6 % of the group revenues EXPLORATION AND TRANSMISSION AND MARKETING AND EXPLORATION AND TRANSMISSION AND IMPORT DISTRIBUTION REFINING MARKETING AND RETAIL PRODUCTION STORAGE SUPPLY PRODUCTION STORAGE UKRGAZVYDOBUVANNYA NAFTOGAZ (HQ) UKRTRANSGAZ 1.5% NAFTOGAZ UKRNAFTA UKRTRANSNAFTA UKRTATNAFTA UKRNAFTA natural monopoly Naftogaz share in the segment (50 % + 1 share) natural monopoly (43 %) The biggest retail chain in Ukraine: 14.6 bcm
    [Show full text]
  • Vol.39 N° 68
    ppi 201502ZU4645 Esta publicación científica en formato digital es continuidad de la revista impresa ISSN-Versión Impresa 0798-1406 / ISSN-Versión on line 2542-3185Depósito legal pp 197402ZU34 Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Derecho Público "Dr. Humberto J. La Roche" de la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas de la Universidad del Zulia Maracaibo, Venezuela Vol.39 N° 68 Enero Junio 2021 ISSN 0798- 1406 ~ De pó si to le gal pp 198502ZU132 * Keywords: terrorist, andseparatistdemonstrationsonUkraine’s stateborder. borders, and thespreadofextremist, border regions,aswell as atUkraine’s threat of escalation of border conflicts and militaryintegrity in sovereign territory. Itisconcluded that there is apotential clashes in Ukraine’s state border threatened to lose the state part of sovereignty, territorial It wasrevealed that theincomplete process of legalthe formalization of formalizing the Ukrainian state border with the Russian Federation. threats toUkraine’snationalsecurity arising fromtheincomplete process state Ukrainian border with neigh bouring countries and highlights the main article seekstoanalyzethecurrentsituationoflegal formalization of the examination inthe context of complex relations between two states. This formalization of the Ukrainian-Russian state border requirescloser [email protected] ORCID ID Kyiv, Ukraine, Guard ServiceofUkraine, First Deputy Head of the State Border GuardService of Ukraine, Administrationof the State Border Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas Vol. 39, Nº 68 (Enero - Junio) 2021, 866-881 IEPDP-Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas - LUZ La re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas, es una pu bli ca ción aus pi cia da por el Ins ti tu to de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co “Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • QR 04-06 (Eng).Indd
    QUARTERLY REPORT for the implementation of the PULSE Project APRIL – JUNE, 2019 (I²I QUARTER OF US FISCAL YEAR 2019) FOURTEENTH QUARTER OF THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION QUARTERLY REPORT for the implementation of the PULSE Project QUARTERLY REPORT for the implementation of the PULSE Project April – June, 2019 (IІI Quarter of US Fiscal Year 2019) fourteenth quarter of the Project implementation 2 April – June, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of abbreviations 4 Resume 5 Chapter 1. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE REPORTING QUARTER 5 Chapter 2. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 7 ER 1: Decentralisation enabling legislation reflects local government input Local government officials participate in sectoral legislation drafting 9 1.1.1. Preparation and approval of strategies for sectoral reforms 9 1.1.2. Preparation of sectoral legislation 24 1.1.3. Legislation monitoring 29 Resolving local government problem issues and promotion of sectoral reforms 30 1.2. Local governments and all interested parties are actively engaged and use 32 participatory tool to work on legislation and advocating for its approval 1.2.1 Support for approval of drafted legislation in the parliament: 32 1.2.2 Support for approval of drafted legislation in the parliament: tools for interaction with the Government of Ukraine 39 1.3. Local governments improved their practice and quality of services because 57 of the sound decentralised legislative basis for local governments 1.3.1. Legal and technical assistance 57 1.3.2. Web-tools to increase the efficiency of local government activities 58 1.3.3. Feedback: receiving and disseminating 58 ER 2: Resources under local self-governance authority increased 60 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow Report to Ukraine's 19Th to 21Th Periodic
    SUBMISSION TO THE 79TH SESSION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION SHADOW REPORT TO UKRAINE’S 19TH TO 21TH PERIODIC REPORT UNDER THE ICERD The “Social Action” Centre – “No Borders” project Minority Rights Group International Contact persons: Bernadett Sebaly: [email protected] Iryna Fedorovych: [email protected] July 2011 1 CONTENTS 1. Introduction & Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 3 2. Recommendations……………………………………………………………………………..4 3. Prohibition of Discrimination In Ukraine: The Legislative Framework And The Practice Of Its Implementation..............................................................................................................................6 4. Failure of Ukraine authorities to protect minorities from racist violence and bring perpetrators of it to liability............................................................................................................................................9 5. Failure of Ukraine to meet the requirement of Article 4 of CERD by effectively banning propaganda and incitement of racial discrimination.........................................................................................18 6. Inefficiency Of Prohibition Of Discrimination Contained In Ukrainian Legislation (Article 2(1)(D))..........................................................................................................................................21 7. Inadequacy of Institutional
    [Show full text]
  • Reply of the Russian Federation to the Written Observations and Submissions of Ukraine on Jurisdiction
    PCA Case No. 2017-06 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION before AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER ANNEX VII TO THE 1982 UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA between UKRAINE and THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION in respect of a DISPUTE CONCERNING COASTAL STATE RIGHTS IN THE BLACK SEA, SEA OF AZOV, AND KERCH STRAIT Volume I - REPLY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION TO THE WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS AND SUBMISSIONS OF UKRAINE ON JURISDICTION ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL: Judge Jin-Hyun Paik, President Judge Boualem Bouguetaia Judge Alonso Gómez-Robledo Judge Vladimir Golitsyn Professor Vaughan Lowe, QC REGISTRY: The Permanent Court of Arbitration 28 January 2019 page intentionally left blank INDEX OF MATERIALS Volume I Reply of the Russian Federation to the Written Observations and Submissions of Ukraine on Jurisdiction Volume II Exhibits Volume III Legal Authorities (in electronic form only) i page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 THE TRIBUNAL HAS NO JURISDICTION OVER UKRAINE’S CLAIM: THE TRIBUNAL CANNOT DETERMINE WHICH STATE IS SOVEREIGN OVER THE LAND TERRITORY OF CRIMEA.................................................................................. 7 I. Alleged inadmissibility .................................................................................................. 9 II. Alleged implausibility .................................................................................................. 12 III. Mauritius
    [Show full text]
  • THEMATIC REPORT Freedom of Movement Across The
    SEC.FR/511/15 22 June 2015 ENGLISH only THEMATIC REPORT Freedom of movement across the administrative boundary line with Crimea 19 June 2015 Contents 1. Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3 3. The administrative boundary line with Crimea ............................................................................... 4 4. Legal context ................................................................................................................................... 5 5. Challenges in crossing the administrative boundary line ................................................................ 6 5.1. Citizenship and passports issues ............................................................................................. 6 5.2. Practical implications of documentary requirements .............................................................. 7 5.3. Suspension of public transport to Crimea ............................................................................... 8 5.4. Cases of the Crimean Tatars and people with pro-Ukrainian views restricted in crossing the ABL…………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Annex No. 1 Map of the ABL between the Kherson region and Crimea ............................................. 10 2 1. Summary The establishment of de facto control over the Autonomous
    [Show full text]
  • In Ukraine: in Search of a Road­Map for Civil Society
    Countering Racism against ©Visible Minorities© in Ukraine: In Search of a Road-Map for Civil Society. Anticipatory Reconnaissance. SOA-3902 by Halyna Bocheva A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree: Master in Human Rights Practice Department of Social Anthropology, University of Tromsù School of Global Studies, Göteborgs University School of Business and Social Sciences, Roehampton University 1 September 2010 DECLARATION FORM The work I have submitted is my own effort. I certify that all the material in the Dissertation which is not my own work, has been identified and acknowledged. No materials are included for which a degree has been previously conferred upon me. Signed Halyna Bocheva Date 1 September 2010 2 ABSTRACT Civil society in Ukraine has been alarmed with the sudden surge of racist violence that was directed against individuals who differed from the majority in phenotype and started in 2006. NGOs and IOs concerned with the problem lobbied the Government to take measures aimed at outlawing racism and prosecuting perpetrators of racist violence. The Government established working groups and specialised units in its bodies that were entrusted with putting an end to racism in the society. In November 2009 Parliament of Ukraine adopted amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine which harshened liability for violent racist crimes. All of these measures, however, were undertaken with no research into what triggered racist attitudes among the population and what continued to perpetuate it. I tried to explore this question and came to conclusion that to some extend factors structuring racist prejudices against visible minorities have their roots in the official ideology and mass culture of the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]