DOCSLIB.ORG

Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Acknowledgements Organizations - Poudre Heritage Alliance (PHA) – oversight and coordination - Poudre Learning Center – staff support and facilities use - National Park Service – oversight and technical support - City of Fort Collins – information source, staff support and facilities use - City of Greeley – information source, staff support and coordination - Larimer County – information source, staff support, provision of information - Town of Timnath – information source, - Weld County – information source, - Town of Windsor – information source, staff support, facilities use Consultants - Belt Collins – contractor for interpretive plan - Root House Design Studio (Mimi Mather, project manager) – subcontractor for interpretive plan - Holden McClure (Susan Walsh, project manager) – subcontractor for marketing portions of interpretive plan Staff - Members of the PHA Board – plan review, oversight, coordination, info source - Chris Kennedy, City of Greeley – management plan project manager - Susan Boyle, National Park Service (retired) – historical and interpretive research - Brandon Gossard, City of Greeley – mapping, data analysis, document production - Greta Steinmetz, City of Greeley – administrative support and document production - Tammy Rusch, Poudre Learning Center – general administrative support - Melanie Pierz, City of Fort Collins – general administrative support - Jeffrey Boring, Larimer County Open Space – general input - Zoe Wyman, City of Fort Collins Open Space – general input - Mike Sidwell, Poudre River Trail Manager – general input - Town of Windsor facilities staff – technical support, meeting setup - City of Fort Collins facilities staff – technical support, meeting setup - Colorado Welcome Center facilities staff – technical support, meeting setup Cache la Poudre River NHA Management Plan Page | i Cache la Poudre River National Heritage Area Management Plan Table of Contents ____________________________________________________________ Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... i How to Use this Document .............................................................................................. v Frequently Asked Questions ........................................................................................... vi Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 VOLUME 1: FOUNDATIONS The National Heritage Area Program: An Overview ................................................. 16 Overview of Cache la Poudre River National Heritage Area .................................... 20 Public Involvement ............................................................................................. 23 Cache la Poudre River NHA Map ....................................................................... 25 Timeline .............................................................................................................. 26 Pre-history and History of the Poudre ....................................................................... 27 Development of Modern Water Law on the Cache la Poudre .................................. 39 The Natural Environment ............................................................................................ 49 Colorado Piedmont ............................................................................................. 50 Climate ............................................................................................................... 51 Table 1: Modern Climatic Conditions .......................................................... 51 Table 2: Historic Climatic Conditions .......................................................... 52 Flora and Fauna ................................................................................................. 52 Table 3: Important Poudre Area Flora ........................................................ 53 Table 4: Important Poudre Area Fauna ...................................................... 54 Historical Ecological Change .............................................................................. 55 The Modern Cache la Poudre - A Snapshot of Today’s Land Uses ........................ 58 Ditches, Canals and Agriculture ......................................................................... 58 Table 5: CALA Acreage by Land Use Type and County ............................. 59 Public Lands ....................................................................................................... 60 Mineral Extraction and Other Business Uses ..................................................... 60 Residential .......................................................................................................... 61 Land Use Maps ............................................................................................. 62-64 Resource Inventory .................................................................................................... 65 Overview Map ..................................................................................................... 66 Cache la Poudre River NHA Management Plan Page | ii Upper Poudre Natural and Recreation Areas .................................................................... 67 Cultural, Educational and Historic Landmarks ............................................ 76 Infrastructure: Ditches, Canals, Dams and Bridges .................................... 78 Heritage and Recreational Events and Activities ........................................ 80 Upper Poudre Map ..................................................................................... 82 Lower Poudre Natural and Recreation Areas .................................................................... 83 Cultural, Educational and Historic Landmarks ............................................ 86 Heritage and Recreational Events and Activities ........................................ 89 Infrastructure: Ditches, Canals, Dams and Bridges .................................... 92 Lower Poudre Map ..................................................................................... 94 Complementary Organizations: Identifying Potential Partners .............................. 95 Potential Partners ............................................................................................... 95 Local Organizations .................................................................................... 96 Regional, State, and National Organizations .............................................. 96 Early Action Projects ........................................................................................ 108 Relationship with Federal government and other agencies .............................. 111 Duties and Actions ............................................................................................ 115 Duties of Poudre Heritage Alliance ........................................................... 117 Related Planning Efforts ................................................................................... 119 VOLUME 2: OPERATIONS Vision and Mission Statements................................................................................ 123 Interpretive Plan What is Interpretation? ............................................................................. 124 Statement of Significance ......................................................................... 124 Framework and Overarching Theme ................................................................ 126 Primary Themes and Storylines ........................................................................ 126 Audience .......................................................................................................... 133 Existing Interpretation within the CALA ............................................................ 134 Goals, Objectives and Action Steps ........................................................................ 137 Goal 1: Organizational Capacity ....................................................................... 138 Goal 2: Story-Telling ......................................................................................... 140 Goal 3: Striking a Balance ................................................................................ 142 Goal 4: Planning for Tourism ............................................................................ 144 Interpretation Implementation Strategies and Branding Initiatives ...................... 145 Interpretive Media Development ....................................................................... 145 Programming and Partnering............................................................................ 150 Branding ........................................................................................................... 155 Specific Commitments for Implementation ............................................................ 159 Implementation Priorities & Planning Level Cost Estimates Priority Actions .................................................................................................. 162 Short-Term Priorities ........................................................................................ 164 Cost Estimates Chart ................................................................................ 165 Cache la Poudre River NHA Management Plan Page | iii Implementation Measures ...............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • LZ Streets County Boundary Printed 4/23/2018 ®

    LZ Streets County Boundary Printed 4/23/2018 ®

    H R A I L R FR526 D A R G R HORSE SAD I DLE M SO E A A AP 9 STO RIN M N NE G 8 R TAIL RAN P I CH R E O O HORN L BUFFALO C C E O C TW K W A V O T O F N E B H R R C R W E RAWA S DIAMOND PEAK LZ AR E 2 A L E S A D 0 A V S 2 M O K L E A WALNO C R O B F B E O C M R N # K R * N E L I D W R A A E C G L K O D N T A A O D BIG HOLE A E S C N R R E A R R P H N E I E F D R B 8 E R Y R 9 V O P R L F SOAPSTONE PRAIRIE NA NORTH LOT LZ P O F S T R E C C A Y D U U H IX D Y W T M K A C D B L K W E S N F # N * M N T F E A S U L O Y Y IT A O L T M S B N O E Y Y V E M C O B R S D N R K O W A R I I A E N E O A R L R N E H I C IG L C L R W R AN I G 4 W E T D S E C S P F A B 3 R R N 7 A I E U T 8 NG I P F P N S G E R A Q O R F S L R L T H C T I S Y P R V 6 I E F C 4 0 I S N 5 A 2 O N E C D A D S R R C L G R 3 F N R G D 1 W T E N 2 U R N S 0 AIL L E I E O C R RED MOUNTAIN OPEN SPACE LZ K 3 RE K K O A O EK R L E M C Z R M N TIM P L N E BER # S E *N O C G T W H I O K R L N N Y E E N L O K H E C I C N C R L A Y C O I I C L H A O V T L P CR80C & FR87C LZ T E VIRGINIA DALE LZ I N A R G C N R RA ED O N J E E A A L P A R I S SH W E L 2 B R C F Y E R A T *# *# P F 8 1 S H C R C A D 8 O E 1 T A 7 E T A HOHNHOLZ LAKES LZ K R AT R E SOAPSTONE PRAIRIE NA SOUTH LOT LZ R V R N I C O R M M P E T R F F E I T 200 B U E W FR L E P # B S L E # * Y * R E K IN E T S C T I H L O 5 C N G K 4 E LS CREEK R I C DEVI D O F A 5 C N S D N E E W R EATON RESERVOIR LZ A I T F I N P U R E BE R A P E R K Q A D 5 R L 9 P *# N O V N K E I A T S T D L I M U D I CR80C MM 22 LZ L D M H E R E Y *# E C B V U R S L CR80C & CR89 LZ T L T DE D E M R S # W PA N E * A R T U L K HOMESTEAD LZ JOY A R N C 0 O J K CANYON O 4 E W A P HA F W 5 R R # L IV ROUND BUTTE LZ * X E R I ATE D F D M R CR92 W IV # B E * CH E E N L F A AN D R R H E R C 5 T J 2 O 3 R P R 1 .
  • Thesis Spatial and Temporal Variability in Channel

    Thesis Spatial and Temporal Variability in Channel

    THESIS SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY IN CHANNEL SURFACE FLOW ACROSS AN ELEVATION GRADIENT ON THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE Submitted by Caroline Martin Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2018 Masters Coittee: Advisor: Stephanie Kampf Sara Rathburn Michael Falkowski Copyright by Caroline Elizabeth Martin 2018 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY IN CHANNEL SURFACE FLOW ACROSS AN ELEVATION GRADIENT ON COLORADO FRONT RANGE Topographic indices such as Upslope Accumulation Area (UAA) and the Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) are commonly used in watershed analyses to derive channel networks. These indices work well for large rivers and streams, but they do not always produce stream locations that match those observed in the field for headwater streams, where geology and soils affect locations of surface channels. This study maps the actively flowing drainage network of four headwater watersheds across an elevation gradient in the Colorado Front Range and examines how these locations of flow relate to topography, geology, climate, and soils. The objectives are to 1) document and digitize the active stream networks in the field, 2) delineate stream network with topographic indices and evaluate how index-derived channel networks compare with observations, and 3) evaluate how geology, climate, and soils affect surface water flow paths. Study sites are small headwater watersheds (1.7 – 15.5 km2) that vary in elevation from 1780 m up to 4190 m. At each watershed, surveys of surface water locations were conducted twice during the summer about a month apart in order to capture temporal variation.
  • To See the Hike Archive

    To See the Hike Archive

    Geographical Area Destination Trailhead Difficulty Distance El. Gain Dest'n Elev. Comments Allenspark 932 Trail Near Allenspark A 4 800 8580 Allenspark Miller Rock Riverside Dr/Hwy 7 TH A 6 700 8656 Allenspark Taylor and Big John Taylor Rd B 7 2300 9100 Peaks Allenspark House Rock Cabin Creek Rd A 6.6 1550 9613 Allenspark Meadow Mtn St Vrain Mtn TH C 7.4 3142 11632 Allenspark St Vrain Mtn St Vrain Mtn TH C 9.6 3672 12162 Big Thompson Canyon Sullivan Gulch Trail W of Waltonia Rd on Hwy A 2 941 8950 34 Big Thompson Canyon 34 Stone Mountain Round Mtn. TH B 8 2100 7900 Big Thompson Canyon 34 Mt Olympus Hwy 34 B 1.4 1438 8808 Big Thompson Canyon 34 Round (Sheep) Round Mtn. TH B 9 3106 8400 Mountain Big Thompson Canyon Hwy 34 Foothills Nature Trail Round Mtn TH EZ 2 413 6240 to CCC Shelter Bobcat Ridge Mahoney Park/Ginny Bobcat Ridge TH B 10 1500 7083 and DR trails Bobcat Ridge Bobcat Ridge High Bobcat Ridge TH B 9 2000 7000 Point Bobcat Ridge Ginny Trail to Valley Bobcat Ridge TH B 9 1604 7087 Loop Bobcat Ridge Ginny Trail via Bobcat Ridge TH B 9 1528 7090 Powerline Tr Boulder Chautauqua Park Royal Arch Chautauqua Trailhead by B 3.4 1358 7033 Rgr. Stn. Boulder County Open Space Mesa Trail NCAR Parking Area B 7 1600 6465 Boulder County Open Space Gregory Canyon Loop Gregory Canyon Rd TH B 3.4 1368 7327 Trail Boulder Open Space Heart Lake CR 149 to East Portal TH B 9 2000 9491 Boulder Open Space South Boulder Peak Boulder S.
  • SPIDER in the RIVER: a COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY of the IMPACT of the CACHE LA POUDRE WATERSHED on CHEYENNES and EURO- AMERICANS, 1830-1880 John J

    SPIDER in the RIVER: a COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY of the IMPACT of the CACHE LA POUDRE WATERSHED on CHEYENNES and EURO- AMERICANS, 1830-1880 John J

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, History, Department of Department of History Spring 4-21-2015 SPIDER IN THE RIVER: A COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE IMPACT OF THE CACHE LA POUDRE WATERSHED ON CHEYENNES AND EURO- AMERICANS, 1830-1880 John J. Buchkoski University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the United States History Commons Buchkoski, John J., "SPIDER IN THE RIVER: A COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE IMPACT OF THE CACHE LA POUDRE WATERSHED ON CHEYENNES AND EURO-AMERICANS, 1830-1880" (2015). Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History. 83. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss/83 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SPIDER IN THE RIVER: A COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE IMPACT OF THE CACHE LA POUDRE WATERSHED ON CHEYENNES AND EURO-AMERICANS, 1830-1880 By John J. Buchkoski A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Major: History Under the Supervision of Professor Katrina L. Jagodinsky Lincoln, Nebraska April, 2015 SPIDER IN THE RIVER: A COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE IMPACT OF THE CACHE LA POUDRE WATERSHED ON CHEYENNES AND EURO-AMERICANS, 1830-1880 John Buchkoski, M.A.
  • A Report on the Difference You Made Caring for and Experiencing Your Colorado

    A Report on the Difference You Made Caring for and Experiencing Your Colorado

    Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado 2016 YEAR-END REPORT A report on the difference you made caring for and experiencing Your Colorado. Thanks to all our friends, partners, and supporters for an incredible year. Your support makes all the difference for Colorado’s outdoors. VOC 2016 Board of Directors Jonathan Adelman Laura Harmon Sean Bahoshy Howard Kenison Bob Broscheid Dara MacDonald Ryan Chase Brad McQueen Paige Claassen Jeff Trujillo Jeff Cornelius Tarn Udall Matthew Greenberg Rebecca Watson, Chair THANK YOU TO OUR SUPPORTERS (from October 27, 2015 to October 27, 2016) VISIONARIES CONSERVATORS ($50,000+) ($1,000 - $4,999) Helen K. and Arthur E. Johnson Foundation Anonymous Bureau of Land Management Jonathan Adelman Colorado Department of Public Health & Adobe Systems, Inc. Environment -- Supplemental Environmental Mary Agster Program AloTerra Restoration Services Mike O’Brien Living Trust Alpine Bank United States Forest Service American Bar Association American Quarter Horse Association STEWARDSHIP SOCIETY Aspen Environmental Foundation ($25,000 - $49,999) Sean and Melissa Bahoshy The Boeing Company Behm Investment Management Colorado State Trails Program Rose Beyer El Pomar Foundation Boulder Brands, Inc. Fred & Jean Allegretti Foundation Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP Noble Energy Burrell Family Foundation REI (Recreational Equipment, Inc.) The Chappell Family Xcel Energy Foundation Ryan Chase Montgomery C. Cleworth TRUSTEES’ CIRCLE Clif Bar & Company ($10,000 - $24,999) CoBank City of Colorado Springs Colorado Department of Agriculture Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife Colorado Trout Unlimited Colorado Native Community First Foundation Denver Parks & Recreation The Cornelius Family Firman Fund Tim and Sue Damour Harlan and Lois Anderson Family Foundation Douglas County Open Space IMI-Precision Engineering Mary H.
  • WY2015 C-BT East Slope North End Water Quality Report

    WY2015 C-BT East Slope North End Water Quality Report

    WY2000 – WY2015 C-BT East Slope North End Water Quality Report March 17, 2017 Prepared by: Judith A. Billica, P.E., Ph.D. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Berthoud, Colorado WY2000-WY2015 East Slope - North End Water Quality Report 03/17/17 This page intentionally left blank. ii WY2000-WY2015 East Slope - North End Water Quality Report 03/17/17 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ III LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................... VII LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... IX ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... XV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. XVII 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT & WINDY GAP PROJECT OVERVIEW ....................................................... 1 1.2 BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM OVERVIEW ..................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Purpose of Baseline Monitoring Program ................................................................... 3 1.2.2 Scope of Baseline Monitoring Program ......................................................................
  • The Environmental History of Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site

    The Environmental History of Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site

    CENTER FOR PUBLIC HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY The Environmental History of Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site Final Draft Elizabeth Michell July 31 2009 An abbreviated version intended as guide for visitors OYL/iJ INTRODUCTION On late spring day visitor stands on slight rise on the banks of Big Sandy Creek from where across Cheyenne chief Black Kettles village once stood whole lot of he nothing comments laconically It is quiet place its peacefulness giving it timeless But quality the visitor is wrong and the timelessness is deceptive You can never visit the past again The Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site is in southeastern fifteen Colorado about miles northeast of the small town of Eads This is high plains country dusty and flat the drab greens of grass and scrub melding into the relentless browns of desiccated vegetation sand and soil The surrounding landscape is crisscrossed dirt by trails and fence lines dotted with windmills outbuildings and stock watering tanks At the site groves of cottonwoods tower along the gently sloping banks of Big Sandy Creek in fact it would be difficult to follow the stream course without the line of trees For most of the year water does not flow and the creek bed is choked with sand sagebrushes and other the site dry prairie species Though is part of shortgrass most of the land is prairie actually sandy bottomland that may eventually become It in Black Kettles tallgrass prairie was dry time and it is still dry evident by how much more sagebrush species there are now
  • THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published Bi-Monthly by the State Historical Society of Colorado

    THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published Bi-Monthly by the State Historical Society of Colorado

    THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published bi-monthly by The State Historical Society of Colorado Vol. XXlll Denver, Colorado, July, 1946 No.4 Prehistoric Peoples of Colorado 1 FRANK H. H. RoBERTS, JR.* Colorado is commonly regarded as one of the younger states in the Union, a state with a relatively short history. yet within its boundaries there is evidence to show that it was one of the earliest occupied areas in North America. In the closing days of the last Ice Age when the climate was cooler and more moist than that of today and when large glaciers still lingered in the nearby moun­ tains small groups of hunters roamed the plains east of the foothills, some even drifted westward into the San Luis Valley, following the herds of game upon which they relied for sustenance. These nomads were part of one of the first in a series of migrations from north­ eastern Asia that was to populate the New World with what, millenia later, Columbus mistakenly called Indians. 2 The most likely route of travel for the earliest of these movements was by way of the Bering Strait region. 3 During the last stage of the Pleisto­ cene the lowlands bordering Bering Sea and the Arctic Coast were not glaciated and following the climax of the period, although large portions of North America were still covered by remnants of the Wisconsin ice sheet, there was an open corridor along the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. Consequently it was possible for men and animals to pass from Central Asia to Alaska, eastward to the Mackenzie River and thence southward into the Northern Plains.
  • Devil's Backbone Management Plan Update

    Devil's Backbone Management Plan Update

    Devil’s Backbone Management Plan Update 1 2 Adoption of the Resource Management and Implementation Plan for Devil’s Backbone Open Space The Resource Management and Implementation Plan for Devil’s Backbone Open Space was recommended for adoption by the Larimer County Open Lands Advisory Board on January 22, 2015 and adopted by the Larimer County Manager and City of Fort Collins Manager. Linda Hoffmann, Larimer County Manager Date I I Darin Atteberry, Fort Collins City Manager Date 3 The Larimer County Natural Resources Department celebrated our 60th Anniversary in 2014. During this period, the help preserve open spaces sales tax was passed and one of the first open spaces we developed for public access was Devil’s Backbone Open Space. Today, approximately 70,000 people per year visit the Backbone to hike, mountain bike and horseback ride. Devil’s Backbone Open Space continues to be one of the most popular outdoor recreation areas near Loveland and we expect visitation to rise. Devil’s Backbone Open Space is popular because it provides something for everyone. The rock feature is a local icon and hundreds of students come from Larimer, Boulder and Weld counties to study the geology. The scenery and views from the open space are fantastic, whether you look west through the Keyhole feature or hike through Indian Creek valley. Wildlife is abundant and visitors are likely to see deer, golden eagles, songbirds, butterflies and flowering plants throughout the open space. Hikers rave about these natural features and mountain bikers love to ride the technical terrain through Laughing Horse Loop or the gentle sections along the north end of the Blue Sky Trail.
  • Cache La Poudre River Management Plan

    Cache La Poudre River Management Plan

    CACHE LA POUDRE WILD AND SCENIC RIVER FINAL MANAGEMENT PLAN MARCH 1990 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Estes-Poudre Ranger District Larimer County, Colorado For Information Contact: Michael D. Lloyd, District Ranger 148 Remington Street Fort Collins, CO 80525 (303) 482-3822 CACHE LA POUDRE WILD AND SCENIC RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE 1 B. LOCATION AND MAPS 1-3 C. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 4 D. AREA DESCRIPTION 5 E. VISION FOR THE FUTURE 8 II RECREATIONAL RIVER MANAGEMENT A. RECREATION 1. Overnight camping 11 2. picnicking, Fishing and River Access 11 3. Kayaking and Non-commercial Rafting 13 4. Commercial Rafting 14 5. Trails 16 6. Information and Interpretation 17 B. CULTURAL RESOURCES 18 C. SCENIC QUALITY 19 D. VEGETATION 20 E. ROADS 21 F. WATER 22 G. FISHERIES 24 H. WILDLIFE 25 I. FIRE 26 J. OTHER LAND USES 27 III. WILD RIVER MANAGEMENT A. RECREATION 29 B. WATER 30 C. WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES 31 D. FIRE, INSECTS AND DISEASE 31 E. OTHER LAND USES 31 IV. SUMMARY OF PROJECTS AND COSTS 32 V. APPENDIX A. BOUNDARY MAPS 37 B. SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS 46 C. WATER QUANTITY 54 D. RECREATION CAPACITY 56 E. COOPERATION WITH LARIMER COUNTY 63 F. COOPERATION WITH STATE AGENCIES 67 G. LAWS, FOREST PLAN, AND OTHER AUTHORITIES 71 H. CONSULTATION WITH OTHERS 76 I. BIBLIOGRAPHY 79 I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to identify Forest Service actions needed to manage and protect the Cache La Poudre Wild and Scenic River and adjacent lands.
  • Geologic Characterization 111 Date 7/31/91 List of Appendices

    Geologic Characterization 111 Date 7/31/91 List of Appendices

    Characterization GEOLOGIC Prepared by ? TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ........................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Characterization .............................. 1 1.2.1 Literature Search .... ........................... 1 1.2.2 Core Processing and Description ..................... 2 1.2.3 Reprocessing of Seismic Data ........................ 2 1.2.4 Grain Size Analysis .............................. 2 1.2.5 Geologic Report ................................ 3 1.3 Location and General Setting ...., ........................ 3 1.4 Previous Studies ...................................... 5 2.0 STRATIGRAPHY ....................................... 7 Precambrian ......................................... 2.1 7 2.2 Paleozoic And Mesozoic Sedimentary Section ................ 2.2.1 Fountain Formation (PennsylvanianPermian) ............ 7 2.2.2 Lyons Sandstone Formation (Permian) ................ 7 2.2.3 Lykins Formation (PermianrTriassic) ................. 10 2.2.4 Ralston Creek Formation (Jiurassic) .................. 10 2.2.5 Momson Formation (Jurassic) ...................... 10 2.2.6 Dakota Group (Lower Cretaceous) ................... 10 2.2.7 Benton Shale Formation (Lower/Upper Cretaceous) ....... 11 2.2.8 Niobrara Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 11 2.2.9 Pierre Shale Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............. 11 2.2.10 Fox Hills Sandstone Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ....... 12 2.2.1 1 Laramie Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 12 2.2.12
  • The Rangelands of Colorado

    The Rangelands of Colorado

    RANGELANDS 15(5), October 1993 213 The Rangelands of Colorado John E. Mitchell To understand the rangelands of Utah border also receives very little Physlographic Regions Colorado,one should first look at its precipitation. Note: It is not com- Physiographers have dividedColo- physiography. Colorado can right- monly known that the stretch of the the be called the"zenith" of the Uni- ColoradoRiver between Grand Lake rado into three major provinces: fully and ted States; on is the and its confluence with Green Great Plains, Rocky Mountains, average, it high- the From a est state in elevation with morethan River in eastern Utah was called the Colorado Plateaus (Fig. 1). of time, these 50 peaks exceeding 14,000 ft. Moun- GrandRiver by early pioneers (Stan- perspective geological Iandforms are young.The pres- tain passes crossingthe Continental ton 1965).] quite Divide in ent Rocky Mountains were uplifted Colorado frequently are Like other western states, Colo- The Great above ft. The lowest in radois The only 60 million years ago. 11,000 point predominantly rangeland. ofalluvial mater- the state, the Arkansas River 1979 Assessment of the U.S. Forest Plainsare composed along ial that eroded from these where it enters is and mandated uplifting Kansas, only slightly Rangeland Situation, and were over below 3,400 ft., while about 95% of the Renewable Resources Plan- mountains deposited by thick mantles of ancient worn Colorado'sland area is morethan "a Act of estimated that 47.5 gravels ning 1974, from ancestral Rockiesformed mile The headwaters of four million ac., or 72°Jo ofthe state's lands away highl" the Paleozoic Era major rivers can be found in the are About 55%of this during (Chronic grazed.