Innst. 13 S (2011–2012) Innstilling Til Stortinget Fra Transport- Og Kommunikasjonskomiteen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Innst. 13 S (2011–2012) Innstilling Til Stortinget Fra Transport- Og Kommunikasjonskomiteen Innst. 13 S (2011–2012) Innstilling til Stortinget fra transport- og kommunikasjonskomiteen Prop. 1 S (2011–2012) Innstilling fra transport- og kommunikasjonskomiteen om bevilgninger på statsbudsjettet for 2012, kapitler under Samferdselsdepartementet, Fiskeri- og kystdepartementet, Fornyings-, administrasjons- og kirkedepartementet og Justis- og politidepartementet (rammeområde 17) Innhold Side 1. Sammendrag .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Oversikt over budsjettforslaget ....................................................................................... 7 2. Komiteens hovedprioriteringer for rammeområde 17 ................................................................. 10 2.1 Stortingets vedtak for rammeområde 17 og oppsummering av forslag .......................... 10 2.2 Generelle merknader fra komiteen .................................................................................. 12 2.2.1 Generelle merknader fra Arbeiderpartiet, Sosialistisk Venstreparti og Senterpartiet ..... 12 2.2.2 Generelle merknader fra Fremskrittspartiet .................................................................... 16 2.2.3 Generelle merknader fra Høyre ....................................................................................... 29 2.2.4 Generelle merknader fra Kristelig Folkeparti ................................................................. 34 3. Samferdselsdepartementet – Utdrag fra budsjettkapitler og komiteens merknader til disse .......................................................................................................................................... 38 3.1 Sammendrag – Hovedpunkter Samferdselsdepartementet .............................................. 38 3.2 Kap. 1300 og kap. 4300 Samferdselsdepartementet ....................................................... 38 3.2.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 38 3.2.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 39 3.3 Kap. 1301 Forskning og utvikling mv. ........................................................................... 40 3.3.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 40 3.3.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 40 3.4 Kap. 1310 Flytransport .................................................................................................... 42 3.4.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 42 3.4.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 42 3.5 Kap. 1311 Tilskot til regionale flyplassar ....................................................................... 44 3.5.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 44 3.5.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 44 3.6 Kap. 1313 og 4313 Luftfartstilsynet ............................................................................... 45 3.6.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 45 3.6.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 45 3.7 Kap. 1314 Statens havarikommisjon for transport .......................................................... 45 3.7.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 45 3.7.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 45 3.8 Kap. 4312 Oslo Lufthavn AS .......................................................................................... 46 3.8.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 46 3.8.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 46 3.9 Kap. 4312 Oslo Lufthavn AS .......................................................................................... 47 3.9.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 47 3.9.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 47 3.10 Kap. 1320 Statens vegvesen ............................................................................................ 47 3.10.1 Sammendrag – Generelt .................................................................................................. 47 3.10.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 47 3.10.2.1 Post 23 Trafikktilsyn, drift og vedlikehold av riksveier m.m. ........................................ 49 3.10.2.2 Post 26 Vegtilsyn ............................................................................................................ 54 3.10.2.3 Post 29 Vederlag til OPS-prosjekter ............................................................................... 55 3.10.2.4 Post 30 Riksveiinvesteringer ...........................................................................................56 3.10.2.5 Post 31 Rassikring ........................................................................................................... 71 3.10.2.6 (ny) Post 32 Uforutsette skred-, ras- og flomhendelser .................................................. 72 3.10.2.7 (ny) Post 32 Planleggingsmidler OPS ............................................................................. 72 3.10.2.8 Post 35 Vegutbygging i Bjørvika .................................................................................... 72 3.10.2.9 Post 36 E16 over Filefjell ................................................................................................ 72 3.10.2.10 Post 37 E6 vest for Alta .................................................................................................. 72 Side 3.10.2.11 Post 61 Rentekompensasjon for transporttiltak i fylkene ............................................... 72 3.10.2.12 Post 62 Tilskudd til rassikring til fylkesveinettet ............................................................ 74 3.10.2.13 (ny) Post 63 Tilskudd til trafikksikringstiltak på fylkesveier .......................................... 74 3.10.2.14 Post 72 Kjøp av riksvegferjetenester ............................................................................... 74 3.10.2.15 Post 73 Trafikksikkerhetstiltak .......................................................................................75 3.10.2.16 (ny) Post 74 kjøp av fylkesveifergetjenester ................................................................... 76 3.11 Kap. 4320 Statens vegvesen ............................................................................................ 77 3.11.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 77 3.11.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 77 3.12 Kap. 4322 og 5624 Svinesundsforbindelsen AS ............................................................. 77 3.12.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 77 3.12.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 77 3.13 Fv. 659 Nordøyvegen i Møre og Romsdal – forhåndsinnkreving av bompenger ........... 77 3.13.1 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 78 3.14 Kap. 1330 Særskilte transporttiltak ................................................................................. 78 3.14.1 Sammendrag .................................................................................................................... 78 3.14.2 Komiteens merknader ..................................................................................................... 78 3.14.2.1 Post 60 Særskilt tilskudd til kollektivtransport ............................................................... 78 3.14.2.2 (ny) Post 61 Styrking av kollektivtrafikken – Storbypakke ............................................ 83 3.14.2.3 (ny) Post 61 Belønningsordning gang- og sykkelveier ................................................... 83 3.14.2.4 Post 70 Kjøp av sjøtransporttjenester på strekningen Bergen–Kirkenes ........................ 83 3.14.2.5 Post 75 Kompensasjon til distriktene for forskjeller i drivstoffpriser ............................. 84 3.15 Kap. 1350 og 4350 Jernbaneverket ................................................................................. 84 3.15.1 Sammendrag ...................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • NFF English Report Series
    S USTAINABLE UNDERGROUND CONCEPTS SUSTAINABLE UNDERGROUNDCONCEPTS NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY PUBLICATION NO. 15 NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY REPRESENTS EXPERTISE IN • Hard Rock Tunneling techniques • Rock blasting technology • Rock mechanics and engineering geology USED IN THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF • Hydroelectric power development, includ- ing: - water conveying tunnels - unlined pressure shafts - subsurface power stations - lake taps - earth and rock fill dams • Transportation tunnels • Underground storage facilities • Underground openings for for public use NORSK FORENING FOR FJELLSPRENGNINGSTEKNIKK Norwegian Tunnelling Sosiety P.O. Box 34 Grefsen, N-0409 Oslo, Norway [email protected] - www.tunnel.no SUSTAINABLE UNDERGROUND CONCEPTS Publication No. 15 NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY 2006 DESIGN/PRINT BY HELLI GRAFISK AS, OSLO, NORWAY Publication No. 15 ISBN-NR. 82-92641-04-1 Front page picture: Gjøvik Olympic Mountain Hall, span 61 meters. Courtesy VS-Group/Bjørn Fuhre Layout/Print: Helli Grafisk AS [email protected] www.helligrafisk.no Disclaimer This publication issued by the NorwegianT unnelling Society (NFF) is prepared by professionals with expertise within the actual subjects. The opinions and statements are based on sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. Readers are advised that the Publications from NorwegianT unnelling Society NFF are issued solely for informational purposes. The opinions and statements included are based on reliable sources in good faith. In no event, however, shall NFF and/or the authors be liable for direct or indirect incidental or conse- quential damages resulting from the use of this information. SUSTAINABLE UNDERGROUND CONCEPTS Norway is a mountainous country. Topographical features along the western coastline are long fjords cutting into steep and high mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principles of Norwegian Tunnelling
    THE PRINCIPLES OF Photo: Gunnar Kopperud NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY PUBLICATION NO. 26 NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY REPRESENTS EXPERTISE IN • Hard Rock Tunneling techniques • Rock blasting technology • Rock mechanics and engineering geology USED IN THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF • Hydroelectric power development, including: - water conveying tunnels - unlined pressure shafts - subsurface power stations - lake taps - earth and rock fill dams • Transportation tunnels • Underground storage facilities • Underground openings for for pub- lic use NORSK FORENING FOR FJELLSPRENGNINGSTEKNIKK Norwegian Tunnelling Sosiety [email protected] - www.tunnel.no www.nff.no Photo: Hæhre Entreprenør AS THE PRINCIPLES OF NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING Publication No. 26 NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY 2017 DESIGN/PRINT BY HELLI - VISUELL KOMMUNIKASJON, OSLO, NORWAY NORWEGIAN TUNLLIN E NG SOCIETY PUBLICAO TI N NO. 26 PUBLICATION NO. 26 © Norsk Forening for Fjellsprengningsteknikk NFF ISBN 978-82-92641-39-2 Front page image: Gunnar Kopperud Layout/Print: HELLI - Visuell kommunikasjon AS [email protected] www.helli.no DISCLAIMER “Readers are advised that the publications from the Norwegian Tunnelling Society NFF are issued solely for informational purpose. The opinions and statements included are based on reliable sources in good faith. In no event, however, shall NFF or the authors be liable for direct or indirect incidental or consequential damages resulting from the use of this information.” 2 NORWEGIAN TUNLLIN E NG SOCIETY PUBLICAO TI N NO. 26 FOREWORD The Norwegian Tunnelling Society NFF is publishing this issue No. 26 in the English Language series for the purpose of sharing with international colleagues, and friends, the experiences of tunnel and cavern construction along with examples of underground use.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Degree Thesis
    Master’s degree thesis LOG950 Logistics Reallocation of seafood freight flows from road to sea Irina Karlsen and Shulin Huang Number of pages including this page: 94 Molde, 23.05.2016 1 Mandatory statement Each student is responsible for complying with rules and regulations that relate to examinations and to academic work in general. The purpose of the mandatory statement is to make students aware of their responsibility and the consequences of cheating. Failure to complete the statement does not excuse students from their responsibility. Please complete the mandatory statement by placing a mark in each box for statements 1-6 below. 1. I/we hereby declare that my/our paper/assignment is my/our own work, and that I/we have not used other sources or received other help than mentioned in the paper/assignment. 2. I/we hereby declare that this paper Mark each 1. Has not been used in any other exam at another box: department/university/university college 1. 2. Is not referring to the work of others without acknowledgement 2. 3. Is not referring to my/our previous work without acknowledgement 3. 4. Has acknowledged all sources of literature in the text and in the list of references 4. 5. Is not a copy, duplicate or transcript of other work 5. I am/we are aware that any breach of the above will be considered as cheating, and may result in annulment of the examination and 3. exclusion from all universities and university colleges in Norway for up to one year, according to the Act relating to Norwegian Universities and University Colleges, section 4-7 and 4-8 and Examination regulations section 14 and 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Monitoring Items for Adverse Ground Conditions In
    Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 32 (2012) 19–33 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tust Evaluation of monitoring items for adverse ground conditions in subsea tunneling ⇑ Hyunwoo Kim a, Seokwon Jeon b, , Eui-Seob Park c a School of Civil, Urban and Geosystem Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea b Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea c Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon, South Korea article info abstract Article history: Three monitoring items, i.e. displacement vector orientation, preceding displacement, and water inflow, Received 1 July 2011 were compared to determine which one best provided supplementary and valuable information on the Received in revised form 21 December 2011 ground ahead of a subsea tunnel face when used with probe drilling. The geotechnical factors affecting Accepted 2 May 2012 tunnel stability were selected from the case studies on the construction of subsea tunnels, and six repre- Available online 12 June 2012 sentative types of adverse ground condition were built with combinations of the factors. The capabilities of monitoring items were compared in depression and weakness zone types that were selected as major Keywords: adverse ground conditions with three criteria, i.e. the capability of categorizing the type of adverse Monitoring ground condition, the early-warning time, and the response capability. A three-dimensional finite ele- Subsea tunnel Adverse ground condition ment analysis program was used to simulate the process of subsea tunnel excavation, and the Analytic Numerical modeling Hierarchy Process was used to select the optimum monitoring item.
    [Show full text]
  • Vurdering Av Ventilasjonsanleggene I Hitra- Og Frøyatunnelen
    Vurdering av ventilasjonsanleggene i Hitra- og Frøyatunnelen Mats Andre Lied Master i veg og jernbane Innlevert: mai 2016 Hovedveileder: Alex Klein-Paste, BAT Medveileder: Gunnar Lotsberg, Statens veivesen Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet Institutt for bygg, anlegg og transport Forord Masteroppgaven er skrevet i samarbeid mellom Faggruppe for veg, transport og geomatikk, Institutt for bygg, anlegg og transport, ved Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet og Statens vegvesen. Masteroppgaven er den avsluttende delen for det erfaringsbaserte masterprogrammet Veg og jernbane. Statens vegvesen har finansiert oppgaven og studiet, med kostnad og arbeidstid, og det rettes en stor takk til disse institusjonene for gjennomføringen. Oppgaven er skrevet på deltid høst 2015 og vår 2016. Hovedveileder hos NTNU, som har utformet oppgaveteksten, har vært Alex Klein-Paste og lokal veileder har vært Gunnar Lotsberg i Statens vegvesen. Studien stiller spørsmålet med ventilasjonsanleggene for Hitra- og Frøyatunnelen med tanke på tunnelsikkerhetsforskriften. Arbeidet med å vurdere ventilasjonanlegg i tunneler er en omfattende prosess og jeg håper dette arbeidet vil bli med i videre prosess for å vurdere tiltak i tunnelene. En stor takk til fagpersoner i Statens vegvesen som har bidratt til å belyse problemstillinger og samtalen med varabrannsjefene i Frøya og Hitra kommune. For tilgangen på beregningsverktøy og forklaring av modellering av ventilasjonsanlegg rettes en ekstra takk til lokal veileder og en siste takk til hovedveileder for
    [Show full text]
  • Diapositiva 1 -..:: CIFI Collegio Ingegneri Ferroviari Italiani
    Commissione Studi - Gruppo Energia ed Ecologia Comitato ITL - Infrastrutture, Trasporti e Logistica PRESENTA “INFRASTRUTTURE STRATEGICHE PER L’ITALIA” LE GRANDI INFRASTRUTTURE NEL MONDO Giovanni Saccà 2021 06 07 – Q32: Le grandi infrastrutture nel mondo (a cura di Giovanni Saccà) Structurae - International Database and Gallery of Structures International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering SFTB International Tunneling and Underground Space Association The International Federation for http://www.infoparlamento.it/Pdf/ShowPdf/8417 Structural Concrete (fib – World Tunnel Congress (WTC) Fédération internationale du béton) The design guidelines for SFTBs 2021 06 07 – Q32: Le grandi infrastrutture nel mondo (a cura di Giovanni Saccà) 2 Ponti sospesi a grande luce 2021 06 07 – Q32: Le grandi infrastrutture nel mondo (a cura di Giovanni Saccà) 3 Ponte sospeso Ponte strallato Ponti sospesi e ponti strallati 2021 06 07 – Q32: Le grandi infrastrutture nel mondo (a cura di Giovanni Saccà) 4 Lunghezza teorica massima dei ponti 5,4 km circa Hybrid bridge proposals for Gibraltar Theoretically optimal forms for very long-span Straits Crossing bridges under gravity loading, Volume: 474, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Z96elalN1I Issue: 2217, DOI: (10.1098/rspa.2017.0726) https://www.academia.edu/22312614/CABLE_SUSPENDED_BRIDGES https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2017.0726 2021 06 07 – Q32: Le grandi infrastrutture nel mondo (a cura di Giovanni Saccà) 5 Curve qualitative di andamento dei costi dei ponti sospesi (SB) e dei
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Tunnel Builders Are the World's Best – a Myth? by Arild Palmström, Msc, Phd., Rockmass AS
    Revised from comments in www.tunnel.no, December 2014 and January 2015 Comments to the paper Norwegian tunnel builders are the world's best – a myth? by Arild Palmström, MSc, PhD., Rockmass AS During the NFF1 Fall Conference on 27 November 2014, Dr. Palmström presented points of view on the Norwegian tunnellers. Some of us assuming that the level of competence is high (even extremely high) whereas others, and the author, have a more factual view. His presentation underscores some facts rocking the bases for exaggerated self-esteem. In the following you will find a selection from his paper. Arild Palmström is well known in the Norwegian geo-engineering sector, he is author of numerous papers, author or co-author of books on rock mechanics, and has wide experience from projects worldwide. In his thesis (Doctor Scientiarum Oslo University 1995), an important part concerns methods for collecting and using geological parameters with focus on block size, rock material and the quality description of the rockmass defined in the index RMi. Summary Some Norwegians within the underground construction environment boast of our tunnellers (not limited to the crew at tunnel face), claiming that these obtain weekly advance higher than competitors abroad. Frequently one will hear that the Underground Olympic Hall in Gjövik (some 100 km north of Oslo) is the largest underground opening for public use, the Laerdal Tunnel is the longest road tunnel, or that one will find the deepest subsea road tunnel on the west coast of the country, and repeatedly that the largest number of underground power house complexes will be found in our country.
    [Show full text]
  • 1D Basin Modelling and Hydrocarbon Resourceassessment of the Taoudeni Basin, Mali
    Institutt for geologi og bergteknikk Hovedoppgaver 2008 2008 Amadou, Ibrahim (S. Lippard) 1D Basin Modelling and Hydrocarbon ResourceAssessment of the Taoudeni Basin, Mali. The intracratonic Taoudeni Basin is the largest sedimentary basin in NW Africa covering large parts of Mali and neighbouring Mauritania. The basin was formed during the mid-late Proterozoic and subsidence continued through to the mid-Paleozoic when Hercynian deformation and uplift occurred. Up to 6000 m of late Precambrian and Paleozoic sediments are found in the basin. A preliminary phase of drilling in the 1970s and 1980s penetrated most of the sedimentary succession and two potential petroleum systems, Late Precambrian and Paleozoic, have been defined. The Late Precambrian system has proven source rocks (algal stromatolites) and black shales and reservoirs in carbonates and sandstone sequences. The Paleozoic system comprises Silurian-Devonian marine shale source rocks and reservoirs in overlying Devono-Carboniferous sandstones and underlying Cambro-Ordovician sandstones. Potential trapping styles are unconformity traps and large scale Hercynian folds. There are several risks to exploration in the Taoudeni Basin. There is a lack of knowledge on the volume and distribution of source, reservoir and seal rocks in the basin, and the detailed structural architecture of the basin itself is poorly understood. Poblems with petroleum generation modelling in the basin include the thermal effects of Hercynian uplift and erosion and the intrusion of Mesozoic dolerites. Using a uniform low heat flow, appropriate for intracratonic basins, the provisional results indicated that the Paleozoic source rocks may have been only marginally mature prior to Hercynian uplift, whereas the Late Precambrian source rocks were probably mature to overmature prior to uplift.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Support in Norwegian Tunnelling
    NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING NORWEGIAN SOCIETY Are you looking for tunneling technology and experience? ROCK SUPPORT IN NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING Check out: www.tunnel.no The Tunneling Technology Website ROCK SUPPORT ROCK IN SUPPORT TUNNELLING NORWEGIAN You will find: – Consultans and experts – Contractors – Equipment and Suppliers – Applied technology – Project descriptions – Pubilications A NFF (Norwegian Tunnelling Society) initiative to promote modern, cost and time efficient tunnelling NO. 19 PUBLICATION NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY PUBLICATION NO. 19 NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY REPRESENTS EXPERTISE IN • Hard Rock Tunneling techniques • Rock blasting technology • Rock mechanics and engineering geology USED IN THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF • Hydroelectric power development, including: - water conveying tunnels - unlined pressure shafts - subsurface power stations - lake taps - earth and rock fill dams • Transportation tunnels • Underground storage facilities • Underground openings for for public use NORSK FORENING FOR FJELLSPRENGNINGSTEKNIKK Norwegian Tunnelling Sosiety P.O. Box 34 Grefsen, N-0409 Oslo, Norway [email protected] - www.tunnel.no ROCK SUPPORT IN NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING Publication No. 19 NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY 2010 DESIGN/PRINT BY HELLI GRAFISK AS, OSLO, NORWAY No r w e g i a N Tu nn e l l i N g So c i e T y Public aTioN N o . 19 PUBLICATION NO. 19 ISBN-NO. 978-82-92641-19-4 Front page picture: Hilde Lillejord. Railway line Lysaker-Sandvika Layout/Print: Helli Grafisk AS [email protected] www.helligrafisk.n0 DISCLAIMER «Readers are advised that the publications from the Norwegian Tunnelling Society NFF are issued solely for informational purpose. The opinions and statements included are based on reliable sources in good faith. In no event, however, shall NFF or the authors be liable for direct or indirect incidental or consequential damages resulting from the use of this information.» 4 No r w e g i a N Tu nn e l l i N g So c i e T y Public aTioN N o .
    [Show full text]