DOCSLIB.ORG

Robert A. Siegel Tom A. Jerman O'melveny & MYERS LLP 555

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Robert A. Siegel Tom A. Jerman O'melveny & MYERS LLP 555 Robert A. Siegel Tom A. Jerman O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 555 13th Street, NW, Suite 500W Washington, DC 20004-1109 (202) 383-5300 Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 Cases ) Case No. 02-83984-91 (SSM) US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC., et al., ) Hon. Stephen S. Mitchell ) Jointly Administered Debtors. ) ) SECOND INTERIM AND FINAL APPLICATION OF O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES O’Melveny & Myers LLP (“O’Melveny”), special labor, regulatory, antitrust and litigation counsel for US Airways Group, Inc. and seven of its subsidiaries and affiliates,1 debtors and debtors-in-possession in the above-captioned cases (collectively, the “Debtors” or the “Company”), hereby submits its application (the “Application”) for an order (i) approving compensation and reimbursement of expenses for the period from December 1, 2002 through March 31, 2003, and (ii) approving on a final basis compensation and reimbursement of expenses under the First Interim Application (as hereinafter defined) as well as this Application, pursuant to sections 330(a)(1) and 331 of Chapter 11, Title 11 of the United States Code (the 1 The seven subsidiaries and affiliates are the following entities: US Airways, Inc., Allegheny Airlines, Inc., PSA Airlines, Inc., Piedmont Airlines, Inc, MidAtlantic Airways, Inc., US Airways Leasing and Sales, Inc. and Material Services Company, Inc. The Application is submitted before the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, Bankruptcy Court (the “Court”). -1- “Bankruptcy Code”), and Rule 2016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), the proposed form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. O’Melveny certifies that the Debtors have received a copy of this Application, but have not completed this review. In addition, O’Melveny certifies that a copy of this Application has been served on the United States Trustees, counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and counsel for the postpetition lenders. In support of the Application, O’Melveny respectfully represents as follows: I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. O’Melveny previously filed its first interim application for allowance of compensation and reimbursement of expenses on January 16, 2003 (the “First Interim Application”) in the aggregate amount of $1,642,179.18, which O’Melveny has since reduced to $1,639,631.33.2 The First Interim Application covered the period from August 11, 2002 (the "Petition Date") through November 30, 2002 (the “First Application Period”). As of the date of this Application, the Court has not issued a ruling regarding O’Melveny’s First Interim Application. O’Melveny seeks final allowance of its fees and expenses for the First Application Period. 2. In addition, O’Melveny requests that this Court authorize compensation to O’Melveny in the amount of $1,391,360.40 and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $95,811.57 for the period from December 1, 2002 through March 31, 2003 (the “Second 2 In reviewing its fee application data subsequent to the filing of the First Interim Application, O'Melveny discovered two errors in the First Interim Application. First, three individuals were inadvertently noted in the First Interim Application as having higher rates than the rates actually billed to US Airways. Second, a single time entry was inadvertently billed to US Airways twice, on separate invoices. After correcting the erroneous rates and eliminating one of the time entries, O'Melveny has lowered its request for fees by $2,547.85, the amount of O’Melveny’s inadvertent errors. O’Melveny provided notice of the errors, as well as corrected backup data reflecting the proper billing information, to the Office of the U.S. Trustee on January 28, 2003. -2- Application Period”). These amounts are net of $171,292.60 in legal fees O’Melveny has written off by virtue of an automatic 10% discount and other voluntary write-downs.3 3. Pursuant to the Fee Protocol, the Debtors have been routinely paying O’Melveny 85% of its fees and 100% of its expenses for the First and Second Application Periods. O’Melveny continues to hold its retainer from the Debtors in the amount of $812,316.48, which it proposes to apply against the 15% of fees that remain unpaid (the “Holdback”) and any other amounts that remain unpaid for the First or Second Application Periods. O’Melveny also proposes to apply any balance of the retainer to future fees and expenses. 4. By this Application, O’Melveny seeks the entry of an order (a) finally allowing all compensation that was the subject of the First Interim Fee Application, (b) finally allowing compensation for the Second Application Period, and (c) authorizing and directing O’Melveny to apply the retainer to payment of the Holdback and any remaining unpaid disbursements for the First and Second Application Periods and permitting O’Melveny to apply any balance of the retainer to future fees and expenses. 5. As hereinafter set forth in detail, the activities performed by O’Melveny, in conjunction with the Debtors and the Debtors’ other retained professionals, were extensive during the Second Application Period, and yielded significant benefits to the estates and their creditors. Moreover, we believe it to be beyond dispute that O’Melveny’s efforts, as set forth below, directly or indirectly contributed to the estates’ receipt of tangible benefits and the successful resolution of the chapter 11 cases. In the circumstances, final allowance of all of O’Melveny’s billable time and disbursements, and payment of the amount unpaid of $829,722.96, is clearly warranted. 3 O’Melveny has applied a discount of 10% off its basic fees generally charged to non-bankrupt clients, amounting to $156,177.55. In addition, O’Melveny has reduced its request by $877.50 to account for 2.6 hours inadvertently billed by an O’Melveny attorney on December 18 to matter number –555 that should have been billed to another client. Finally, because O’Melveny estimated in its First Interim Application that it incurred approximately $37,800.00 in fees in preparation of the First Interim Application, but actually incurred $52,037.55 in fees for the preparation, O’Melveny has voluntarily written-off the difference between the estimated and actual fees in the amount of $14,237.55. -3- II. RETENTION OF O’MELVENY 6. O’Melveny has been the principal outside labor, regulatory, antitrust and litigation counsel to the Company since 1996. 7. On August 11, 2002 (the “Petition Date”), the Debtors filed voluntary petitions in this Court for reorganization relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors continued to operate their businesses and manage their properties as debtors-in- possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. On August 12, 2002, this Court entered a provisional order providing for the joint administration of these cases, which have been consolidated for procedural purposes only. On August 20, 2002, the United States Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Creditors Committee”) in these cases. 8. The Debtors filed their application to employ O’Melveny with the Court on August 11, 2002. O’Melveny charges legal fees on an hourly basis at its attorneys’ individual hourly rates, which are based on the attorney’s seniority and experience, and which are adjusted from time to time. During the Second Application Period, hourly rates were adjusted as of January 1, 2003. O’Melveny also charges the Debtors for actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred, such as court services, telecopies, computerized research, delivery services, photocopies, long distance phone calls, fees associated with ongoing litigation, travel and other costs necessarily incurred in connection with its representation of the Debtors. O’Melveny’s fee structure and expense reimbursement policies were disclosed in the Debtor’s application to employ O’Melveny, to which no party objected. This Court approved the O'Melveny retention by order entered on August 12, 2002, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. III. FEE PROCEDURES AND MONTHLY FEE STATEMENTS 9. On August 16, 2002, the Court approved formation of a joint fee review committee (the “Fee Review Committee”) to review, comment on and, if necessary, object to the -4- various fee applications filed in these cases. The Fee Review Committee has met and agreed upon a protocol in these cases (the “Fee Review Protocol”). 10. On September 6, 2002, this Court entered an Administrative Order Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a) and 331 Establishing Procedures For Interim Compensation And Reimbursement Of Expenses Of Professionals (Docket No. 445) (the “Administrative Order”). Pursuant to paragraph 2(4) of the Administrative Order, O’Melveny is submitting this Application to the Debtors, as well as to the Debtors’ postpetition lenders, counsel to the Creditors Committee, and the United States Trustee. 11. In compliance with the Administrative Order and the Fee Review Protocol, on or before the last day of each month following the month for which compensation was sought, O’Melveny furnished to the Debtors, counsel to the Debtors, co-counsel to the Debtors, as well as to counsel to the Debtors’ postpetition lenders, counsel to the Creditors Committee, and the United States Trustee, a monthly statement of all professional fees and disbursements incurred during the preceding calendar month. The parties had twenty (20) days to review any such statement. If there were no objections, at the expiration of the twenty (20) day period, the Debtors were ordered to promptly pay eighty-five percent (85%) of the fees and one hundred percent (100%) of the expenses identified in each monthly statement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US Air Release FINAL 5-10-4
    MDA FOR RELEASE Monday, May 10, 2004 US AIRWAYS ANNOUNCES LOWER FARES, ADDITIONAL SERVICE AND REGIONAL JETS FOR SYRACUSE Mayor Driscoll and MDA hail progress in continuing partnership to revitalize Hancock Airport SYRACUSE, N.Y., May 10, 2004 – US Airways, in cooperation with the Metropolitan Development Association of Syracuse and Central New York and Mayor Matthew Driscoll, today introduced lower fares and increased service to several of Hancock International Airport’s top business destinations. In five of the eight-nonstop destinations served by US Airways from Syracuse, the walk-up fares have been reduced by approximately 31-54 percent compared to previous levels and range from $278 to $786 roundtrip. These low fares do not require a minimum stay requirement. They are available between Syracuse and Baltimore/Washington (BWI), Charlotte, N.C., Hartford, Conn., New York LaGuardia and Philadelphia. These business fares on average are 31- to 54-percent lower than traditional walk-up fares offered on these routes. EXAMPLES OF THESE LOW ROUNDTRIP FARES* FROM SYRACUSE DESTINATION DISCOUNT FARE New York LaGuardia 52 percent $278 Baltimore/Washington 56 percent $419 Hartford, Conn. 35 percent $498 Philadelphia 31 percent $598 Charlotte, N.C. 34 percent $786 In addition, US Airways added two daily nonstop regional jet flights between Syracuse and Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, bringing the total number of flights on this route to five. These new flights also reflect the company’s plans to transition from the current turbo-prop service to regional jet service. “US Airways has been serving the Syracuse community dependably since 1949 and today we provide the most service of any carrier at Hancock International Airport,” B.
    [Show full text]
  • História Da Embraer
    História da Embraer Sumário 1965-1969 A Criação da Embraer 1 1000 a.C.-1936 A Gravidade Vencida 5 1936-1969 A Primeira Fabricação em Série de Aeronaves no País 9 1969-1976 Choque do Futuro 13 1975-1980 O Programa Piper 17 1972-1983 Em Busca de Novas Oportunidades de Negócio 21 1978-1983 Grandes Desafios 25 1980-1991 A Aviação na Década de 80 29 1976-1998 Segurança e Desenvolvimento 33 1989-1999 Uma Boa Idéia: Jato Regional 37 1994-2005 Família do ERJ 145: PT-ZJA, Um por Todos 41 1993-2005 Transferência Tecnológica 49 1991-2006 Derivados Militares do ERJ 145 57 2006 Presente e Futuro 65 1965 - 1969 A Criação da Embraer 1 história da aeronáutica é, essencialmente, a história da evolução tecnológica do setor temperada pelo Aespírito empreendedor dos pioneiros e inovadores. A nossa série de artigos sobre a história da Embraer se iniciará com o nascimento do bimotor Bandeirante, que, em primeira análise, levou à criação da empresa. No próximo fascículo será feito um apanhado dos principais fatos que marcaram a história da aeronáutica no Brasil desde os 2 3 primórdios da aviação. A narração da história seguirá com os principais marcos da história da Embraer, encerrando-se com um ensaio sobre a aviação no futuro. Brasileira, mas de alcance mundial No mês de agosto de 2004, durante as comemorações do 35o aniversário da criação da Empresa Brasileira de 4 5 Aeronáutica S.A., a Embraer, deve-se também ser festejada uma incrível história de um sucesso comercial, econômico e tecnológico. A empresa possui uma história peculiar, pois o bimotor Bandeirante, o seu principal produto durante muitos anos, precedeu a sua criação.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Regional Air Service Initiative Handbook
    Northwest Regional Air Service Initiative Handbook Small Community Air Service Development empowering pacific northwest communities Northwest Regional Air Service Initiative Handbook These materials are sponsored by Oregon Department of Aviation Washington Department of Transportation – Aviation Oregon Airport Management Association Washington Airport Management Association US Department of Transportation © Mead & Hunt, Inc. 2006 Table of contents Section 1 Section 4 An overview of the Northwest Regional Airline types and their potential for air Air Service Initiative (NWRASI) service development Introduction . 1 Legacy airlines . 11 Background . 1 Low-cost airlines . 12 NWRASI goals . 2 Select airlines . 13 NWRASI plan . 2 Regional airlines . 13 Phase I . Small Community Air Service Other airlines . 14 Development Tool Kit . 2 Summary of main points . 14 Phase II . Small Community Air Service Market Analysis . 3 Section 5 Phase III . Oregon–Washington Small The importance of airline partnerships Community Air Service Strategies . 3 Marketing Agreements . 15 Summary of main points . 3 Codeshares and their role . 15 Interline Agreements . 16 Section 2 Contract and at-risk agreements . 16 Air service contributions to economy and lifestyle Summary of main points . 17 Contribution to the overall economy . 5 Contribution to local businesses . 6 Section 6 Contribution to quality of life . 6 Kinds of aircraft and their fit with small communities Summary of main points . 6 Aircraft economics . 19 Matching aircraft to markets . 20 Section 3 Jet versus turboprop orders and replacements . 20 e v i Industry status and impact on air service t Regional airline fleet trends . 21 a i An industry struggling financially . 7 t i Service providers and aircraft . 21 n I The 9-11 hangover .
    [Show full text]
  • UFTAA Congress Kuala Lumpur 2013
    UFTAA Congress Kuala Lumpur 2013 Duncan Bureau Senior Vice President Global Sales & Distribution The Airline industry is tough "If I was at Kitty Hawk in 1903 when Orville Wright took off, and would have been farsighted enough, and public-spirited enough -- I owed it to future capitalists -- to shoot them down…” Warren Buffet US Airline Graveyard – A Only AAXICO Airlines (1946 - 1965, to Saturn Airways) Air General Access Air (1998 - 2001) Air Great Lakes ADI Domestic Airlines Air Hawaii (1960s) Aeroamerica (1974 – 1982) Air Hawaii (ceased Operations in 1986) Aero Coach (1983 – 1991) Air Hyannix Aero International Airlines Air Idaho Aeromech Airlines (1951 - 1983, to Wright Airlines) Air Illinois AeroSun International Air Iowa AFS Airlines Airlift International (1946 - 81) Air America (operated by the CIA in SouthEast Asia) Air Kentucky Air America (1980s) Air LA Air Astro Air-Lift Commuter Air Atlanta (1981 - 88) Air Lincoln Air Atlantic Airlines Air Link Airlines Air Bama Air Link Airways Air Berlin, Inc. (1978 – 1990) Air Metro Airborne Express (1946 - 2003, to DHL) Air Miami Air California, later AirCal (1967 - 87, to American) Air Michigan Air Carolina Air Mid-America Air Central (Michigan) Air Midwest Air Central (Oklahoma) Air Missouri Air Chaparral (1980 - 82) Air Molakai (1980) Air Chico Air Molakai (1990) Air Colorado Air Molakai-Tropic Airlines Air Cortez Air Nebraska Air Florida (1972 - 84) Air Nevada Air Gemini Air New England (1975 - 81) US Airline Graveyard – Still A Air New Orleans (1981 – 1988) AirVantage Airways Air
    [Show full text]
  • Refguide 10 Ds Final 19Uhr09
    RefGuide_2010_Umschlag_Ref.Guide_Umschlag 29.03.10 12:36 Seite 1 ™ REFERENCE GUIDE STAR ALLIANCE ™ MEMBERS AND LEGEND KEY Star Alliance welcomes Aegean Airlines and TAM STAR ALLIANCE STAR Spanair Future Members www.staralliance.com 14th Edition, May, 2010 May, 14th Edition, REFERENCE GUIDE For Employees of Star Alliance Members Carriers RefGuide_2010_Umschlag_Ref.Guide_Umschlag 29.03.10 12:36 Seite 2 Star Alliance Members WELCOME 2010 Adria Aegean Air Canada Air China Airways Airlines AC CA JP A3 APRIL MAY JUNE OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER Air New Air New ANA Asiana Welcome to the 14th edition of the Star Alliance Reference Guide. Zealand Zealand NH Airlines SMTWT F S SMTWT F S SMTWT F S SMTWT F S SMTWT F S SMTWT F S NZ NZ OZ 1 23 1 1234 5 1 2 1 23456 1234 Austrian Blue1 bmi Brussels OS KF BD Airlines 456 7 8 9 10 2345678 678 9 1011 12 3456 7 89 789 10 11 12 13 5678910 11 SN 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 1718 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2010 marks another year of growth for the Alliance. This edition includes baggage, airport and frequent Continental Croatia EGYPTAIR LOT Polish 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 2625 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CO Airlines MS Airlines flyer information for both TAM and Aegean Airlines (to join second quarter).
    [Show full text]
  • Present: All the Justices PMA CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY
    Present: All the Justices PMA CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Record No. 051179 OPINION BY JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS March 3, 2006 US AIRWAYS, INC., ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY Joanne F. Alper, Judge This appeal involves a claim for compensation for business interruption losses arising from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the United States of America. In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court correctly interpreted and applied the provisions of an insurance contract. For the reasons discussed below, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed. I. Facts and Proceedings Below US Airways, Inc., Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Piedmont Airlines, Inc., PSA Airlines, Inc., and MidAtlantic Airways, Inc., ("US Airways") entered into an "All Risk Manuscript Property Policy" ("Policy") subscription insurance contract with six insurance providers. The Policy provided commercial property coverage in the amount of twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000.00) from December 1, 2000, through December 1, 2001. The six insurance providers provided varying percentage amounts of coverage and, of the six, only one, PMA Capital Insurance Company ("PMA"), is involved in the present appeal. PMA is the successor in interest to one of the original subscribers, Caliber One Indemnity Company, which underwrote 10% of the twenty-five million dollars in coverage. On the morning of September 11, 2001, terrorists hijacked several commercial aircraft flying within the airspace of the United States. Shortly after two of the aircraft were crashed into the World Trade Center in New York City, the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) issued a “Notice to Airmen” (“NOTAM” or "ground stop order") ordering all civilian aircraft to land or stay on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • The Debtors Are the Following Entities: US Airways Group, Inc., US Airways
    John Wm. Butler, Jr. John K. Lyons SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM (ILLINOIS) 333 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2100 Chicago, Illinois 60606-1285 (312) 407-0700 Lawrence E. Rifken (VSB No. 29037) McGUIREWOODS LLP 1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1800 McLean, Virginia 22102-4215 (703) 712-5000 Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION In re: ) ) Case No. 02-83984 (SSM) ) Jointly Administered US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC., et al., ) Chapter 11 ) Hon. Stephen S. Mitchell Debtors. ) MOTION FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a) AND 331 ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR INTERIM COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES OF PROFESSIONALS US Airways Group, Inc. (“Group”) and seven of its subsidiaries and affiliates (the “Affiliate Debtors”),1 debtors and debtors-in-possession in the above- captioned cases (collectively, the “Debtors”), hereby move (the “Motion”) this Court for an administrative order, the proposed form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 The Debtors are the following entities: US Airways Group, Inc., US Airways, Inc., Allegheny Airlines, Inc., PSA Airlines, Inc., Piedmont Airlines, Inc., MidAtlantic Airways, Inc., US Airways Leasing and Sales, Inc. and Material Services Company, Inc. A, under 11 U.S.C. §§ 105 and 331 establishing procedures for interim compensation and reimbursement of expenses of professionals. In support of this Motion, the Debtors rely on the Affidavit of David N. Siegel in Support of Chapter 11 Petitions and First Day Orders, sworn to on August 11, 2002. In further support of this Motion, the Debtors respectfully represent as follows: BACKGROUND A.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Aviation Law Donald R
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 74 | Issue 1 Article 10 2009 Recent Developments in Aviation Law Donald R. Andersen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Donald R. Andersen, Recent Developments in Aviation Law, 74 J. Air L. & Com. 153 (2009) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol74/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN AVIATION LAW DONALD R. ANDERSEN* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. MONTREAL AND WARSAW CONVENTIONS .... 155 A. MONTREAL CONVENTION ........................ 155 1. Parties Liable ................................ 155 2. Exclusive Cause of Action .................... 162 3. A ccident .................................... 168 4. Venue ....................................... 172 5. Limitation of Actions ........................ 175 6. Damages ............................. 176 B. WARSAW CONVENTION ............................. 179 1. Exclusive Cause of Action .................... 179 2. Warsaw Notice Requirements.................. 183 3. "Carriageby Air" .... ....................... 184 4. "Accident" ....... ........................... 186 5. Embarking and Disembarking................. 188 6. Dam ages .................................... 191 II. AIR CARRIER LIABILITY .......................... 192 III. FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Between US Airways, Inc. and Passenger Service Employees
    Agreement Between US Airways, Inc. and Passenger Service Employees As represented by Communications Workers of America 2005 2005 Agreement Between US Airways, Inc. and the Communications Workers of America Representing Passenger Service Employees TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE Preamble.........................................................................................................iii Article 1 – Purpose of Agreement ................................................................... 1 Article 2 – Status of Agreement ...................................................................... 2 Article 3 – Recognition and Scope .................................................................. 4 Article 4 – Classifications................................................................................ 9 Article 5 – Hours of Service .......................................................................... 18 Article 6 – Overtime – Customer Service...................................................... 26 Article 7 – Overtime - Reservations .............................................................. 37 Article 8 – Seniority ...................................................................................... 43 Article 9 – Filling of Vacancies..................................................................... 47 Article 10 – Temporary Employees............................................................... 58 Article 11 – Seasonal Employee Transfer ..................................................... 59 Article 12 – Reductions in Force..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rae Meeting DECEMBER 15, 2011
    DVRPC RAe Meeting DECEMBER 15, 2011 • AGENDA • MINUTES from September 29, 2011 • NEWS ARTICLES d DELAWARE VALLEY fJ REGI!.rpC PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL PRESENTATION: TOM THATCHER Title: NJ Airport Aid Procedures - From the Airports' Viewpoint Spring Garden Street Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission 190 N. Independence Mall West t e Philadelphia, PA 19106 e D Str Percy Stre R (215) 592-1800 3 t e t re t et 10TH Street 9TH Street t S Darien S Stree TH H 5 8TH Street 8TH eet 6T 7TH Street 7TH Ridge Ave tr tre Willow Street H S H et T nue 4 Callowhill Street 9TH Street Wood Street ine Street Expressway V eet Vine Street Str e Vine Street 676 Vine Street Vine Street Lawrenc Winter Street New Street eet Franklin Square 676 Benjamin Franklin Bridge Spring Street Florist Street nklin Str nklin ra CHINATOWN t F Race Street Race Street City of Phila. Police Admin. DVRPC t Building United t et e eet National e tr 8TH Street 8TH Cherry Street Constitution States Cherry Street H S H D Str H Stre T Center T t R 10TH Street Federal 6 9 3 Appletree Street Reserve Mint t Street 7TH Bank Arch Street Arch Street t t United t OLD CITY States Federal Building eet eet tr tr Filbert Street Independence H S H H S H T T Visitor 4 5 United Center States Court 8th St. 5th St. House Station Station Market Street Market Street Market-Frankford Line Ludlow Street Liberty The Bell Bourse Ranstead Street Ranstead Street Center t - Parking (Daily and Monthly) Chestnut Street Independence Hall t - Parking (Daily Only) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 Miles D DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION BY AUTOMOBILE DVRPC is located From Western PA: Take 1-76 East (PA Turnpike) to Exit 326 Valley Forge Interchange.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Certificated Air Carriers (Last Updated: July 3, 2019)
    U.S. Certificated Air Carriers (last updated: July 3, 2019) Cargo Carrier Firstname Lastname Title Address City State Zip Telephone Pax/Cargo Operating Only ABX Air, Inc. David Soaper President 145 Hunter Drive Wilmington OH 45177 800-736-3973 2096 D&FS Yes Aeko Kula, LLC Elizabeth W Seaton President & CEO 50 Elliott St. Honolulu HI 96819 206-652-1101 D&FS Yes d/b/a Aloha Air Cargo "Betsy" Aero Micronesia, Inc. Adam Ferguson CEO P.O. Box 24858 GMF Barrigada GU 96921 671-647-0017 D&FC Yes d/b/a Asia Pacific Airlines Aerodynamics Incorporated Ted Vallas President and Chief 2100 Carlsbad Palomar Rd Carlsbad CA 92011 404-410-7612 DS Yes d/b/a Great Lakes Jet Express Operating Officer d/b/a Sky Value d/b/a Sky Value Airways d/b/a California Pacific Airlines Air Excursions, LLC Michael Stedman President 1873 Shell Simmons Dr. Suite 110 Juneau AK 99801 907- 789-3331 DS Yes d/b/a Alaska Seaplanes Air Transport International, Inc. James O'Grady President & CEO 145 Hunter Drive, Mail Stop 2061T Wilmington OH 45177 937-366-5028 D&FS Yes Christine Deister President and CEO W6390 Challenger Drive, Suite 203 Appleton WI 54914 920-749-4188 DS Yes Air Wisconsin Airlines LLC d/b/a United Express AirTran Airways, Inc. 9955 Airtran Boulevard Orlando Fl 32827 DS No/c Alaska Airlines, Inc. Bradley B. Tilden CEO Alaska Airlines, Inc. P.O. Box 68900, Seayz Seattle WA 98168 206-392-5362 D&FS Yes Alaska Central Express, Inc. Michael Bergt President 5901 Lockheed Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Hearing Brief of the US Airways (East) Pilot Seniority Integration Committee TABLE of CONTENTS
    BEFORE THE MCCASKILL-BOND AMENDMENT SECTIONS 3 AND 13 ARBITRATION BOARD DANA E. EISCHEN, IRA F. JAFFE, M. DAVID VAUGHN, Arbitrators _________________________________ ) In the matter of the seniority list ) integration involving the Pilots of ) NEW AMERICAN AIRLINES ) _________________________________ ) Post-Hearing Brief of the US Airways (East) Pilot Seniority Integration Committee TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1 Factual Background: Restoring American Airlines to Preeminence Through the Merger With US Airways ............................................................................... 11 1. American’s path into bankruptcy ................................................................... 12 2. American seeks to impose a concessionary agreement on its pilots that would gut the APA agreement and reduce the active American pilot group by 15 percent; the American pilots choose a merger of American and US Airways as their best strategic alternative ........................................ 14 3. US Airways’ pursuit of a merger with American ............................................ 19 4. USAPA initiates bargaining for a four-party memorandum of understanding ............................................................................................... 21 5. American receives permission to reject the American pilot contract under Section 1113 ....................................................................................... 22 6.
    [Show full text]