DOCSLIB.ORG

Closing the Gap the South West Peninsula Strategic Rail Blueprint

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Closing the Gap the South West Peninsula Strategic Rail Blueprint Closing the gap The South West Peninsula strategic rail blueprint November 2016 For the South West, investment into the rail with other areas. Links to Bristol, Birmingham • Invest £1.5bn to reduce journey times by up to The UK’s record of investment into infrastructure network will unlock a host of benefits, generating and London, as well as other travel hubs such as 14 minutes to Penzance, through infrastructure is mixed; in the South West we strongly believe an additional £7.2bn of GVA and £1.8bn of transport Heathrow, Gatwick and Southampton are vital, as improvements, partial electrification and a new approach is needed. Other countries are benefits in the coming years, transforming the are our interregional provision. The report clearly franchise renewals using different ways to invest and deliver their economy and our communities. With passenger calls for reliable and high quality services, accessible infrastructure, successfully: on time and on budget. • Invest £150m reducing journey times and growth at 128%, we consistently outstrip industry to all, enabling passengers to work and travel in We want to work with Government, Network Rail, increasing core capacity on the Exeter –Waterloo forecasts and our potential is growing. 75% of SW comfort. train operating companies and private sector line businesses stated that rail is vital to their business Since the initial report, we have undertaken partners to explore new avenues and bring benefits and that reducing the journey time to London by 45 • Invest £358m to improve capacity and comfort extensive studies with partners Network Rail, the to the South West as soon as possible. minutes would have a significant positive impact on through new rolling stock, infrastructure Department for Transport, Great Western Railway Our message to Government is plain: there must be their productivity. enhancements and phased opening of the and the University of Plymouth to look at ways to real enhancements to our rail network, improving Northern Route Since the severe weather incidents of 2014 when the achieve our aims. existing provision. Reduced services, loss of line was severed at Dawlish, and floods engulfed the • Increase frequency to 2 trains an hour west of connections and slower trains are unacceptable. Our immediate priorities to 2019 are: Somerset Levels, the South West has been working Exeter to Bristol and the Midlands Whilst our rail network cannot be transformed • Invest £284m in resilience, including hard to develop a strategic plan for our rail network. We want to realise our true economic potential and overnight, we must tackle the decades of commencing the securing of the main rail line Starting with the formation of the Peninsula Rail contribute to UK PLC. With exceptional opportunities underinvestment, we must start now and we must through Dawlish and Teignmouth Task Force – a partnership of local authorities, such as Hinkley, world-class aerospace, nuclear and hold true to that course in the years to come. LEPs and stakeholders, it has gone on to work with • Completion of committed flood relief schemes marine industries, outstanding natural assets such South West MPs to respond to a commission by as the North Cornwall and Jurassic Coasts, UNESCO PRTF Chair • Introduce trains capable of operating along the Government for a plan. This is the result: ‘Closing Global Geopark and national parks, we have Councillor seawall in all weathers the gap’, our blueprint for rail. significant prospects to exploit. As investments into Andrew Leadbetter • Invest £2.5m in GRIP 3 options for the Our plan is not a quick fix, a long term view is other areas are realised, such as Crossrail and HS2, diversionary route East of Exeter required. The South West has lost out because the gap between the South West and the rest of the of poor transport investment for over 20 years, • Invest £22m in GRIP 3 options for reducing UK will become more pronounced. But we strongly averaging £35/head compared to a national average journey times believe that new infrastructure can, and will, redress this imbalance. of £98/head – leaving our region some £2bn behind • Increase frequency to 2 direct trains an hour other areas. Our regional rolling stock is the oldest, from Plymouth to London in the new franchise, dating back to the late 1970s. The Met Office reducing journey times by up to 10 minutes, says climate change incidents will become more whilst at least maintaining existing services RAIL FOR BUSINESS Survey frequent, and with Network Rail warning that the Important for • Work with the rail industry to maximise 80% line at Dawlish will suffer closure every four years by business travel 75% value links to the benefits of the new trains from Dec 2018 2065, the South West remains more vulnerable than Used by staff for NORTH 60% and invest £25m to make our journeys more business travel MIDLANDS value links to many parts of the UK. Our economy depends on 87% BRISTOL INTERNATIONAL good connectivity, but unlike other areas, we do not productive through on board travelling office, Used by AIRPORTS have a good network to start with. media and mobile/Wi-Fi connectivity. suppliers 53% Over the medium term to 2029, we are focused on Used by staff for commuting Our initial priorities of greater resilience, faster continuing investment: 36% Y value91% links to IT journey times and more capacity and connectivity IV • Invest £301m to complete Dawlish seawall CT LONDON remain. Our last report, ‘On Track’, set out the 69% NE SOUTH EAST and cliffs resilience, the diversionary route value links CON importance of maintaining the iconic mainline within the between Exeter and Castle Cary and estuary flood through Dawlish, creating real journey time savings protection and greater capacity, as well as increasing the SW Produced by the GeoMapping Unit, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University opportunities for communities to interconnect SURVEY NETWORK JOURNEY TIME IMPROVED PRIORITIES 47% RESILIENCE 43% REDUCTIONS 10% CAPACITY 2 PENNINSULA RAIL TASK FORCE PENNINSULA RAIL TASK FORCE 3 CLOSING THE GAP - THE SOUTH WEST PENINSULA STRATEGIC RAIL BLUEPRINT CLOSING THE GAP - THE SOUTH WEST PENINSULA STRATEGIC RAIL BLUEPRINT Endorsements Our economy Cornwall Devon Plymouth Somerset Torbay “I congratulate all those involved in SOUTH WEST compiling this 20 year plan which Our economy has many strengths but WORKPLACE GVA it cannot realise its full potential due to when implemented will see increasing SALARIES UK £24,600 constraints on connectivity. benefits brought to our region. I now South West average £22,300 call upon government to deliver and The South West is perceived to be BELOW distant from centres of commerce as a Devon £20,150 ensure that the South West has a rail NATIONAL service fit for the 21st century.” result of journey times, deterring inward Plymouth £19,900 investment. The economy is further AVERAGE Somerset £18,381 Gary Streeter restricted by long journey times, an moving 20% Devon population MP for South West Devon equally fragile road network and the west get Cornwall £17,300 dispersed nature of our towns and cities. Torbay £15,500 DO NOT OWN A CAR “Never again” – That is what I hear Greater connectivity would promote more lower from communities across the South employment, more opportunities for 98,000 1.1 million 2.2 million 36 billion West Peninsula when I ask about investment and greater accessibility for businesses jobs population output connectivity from our region. Never investors. again can we be cut off from the rest of the country because of creaking trips by rail for infrastructure and severe storms. TOURISM & aerospace HOSPITALITY This report, which is the culmination of years of hard work 50% by people across the South West, gives a sound and forward- marine thinking blueprint for the next generation of rail travel to the 14.7million manufacturing Peninsula. to London SW The storms of February 2014 forced Government to sit up businesses and listen to what we had been saying for years – that the hi-tech classed as South West has been chronically under-funded for decades, 25.6 million innovative resulting in millions of pounds lost in growth over a 6 week to the SW creative period. Whilst the Government gave the commitment to sort the line out at Dawlish and the Orange Army of Network Rail Photo © Tony Jackson engineers fixed the line, it has taken a united front, speaking REGIONAL SPEND with one voice, to get to this point. PER HEAD 128%passenger This is a serious report, which I know will spark a serious growth in discussion about how we deal with a historical lack of £35 yrs funding into our region. Better connectivity means better, SOUTH higher paying jobs and in turn, greater growth for our region. Last major £97 WEST 21 investment No major It took a shock to the system to reach this point, but I am ENGLAND over last sure that this report will lay the foundations for a golden Paddington timetable improvements generation in connectivity to and from the South West. to Penzance 20 years Paddington to Oliver Colvile Penzance £2,530,000,000 MP for Plymouth Sutton and Devonport, HST for years Chair of the SW Rail All Party Parliamentary Group has not been spent 1976 30 Produced by the GeoMapping Unit, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University 4 PENNINSULA RAIL TASK FORCE PENNINSULA RAIL TASK FORCE 5 CLOSING THE GAP - THE SOUTH WEST PENINSULA STRATEGIC RAIL BLUEPRINT CLOSING THE GAP - THE SOUTH WEST PENINSULA STRATEGIC RAIL BLUEPRINT GLOUCESTERSHIREGLOUCESTERSHIRE HERTFORDSHIREHERTFORDSHIRE Resilience and reliability South west rail infrastructure vulnerability GLOUCESTERSHIRE HERTFORDSHIRE OXFORDSHIREOXFORDSHIRE OXFORDSHIREBUCKINGHAMSHIREBUCKINGHAMSHIRE The Dawlish mainline remains our top priority. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE Resilience – the ambition: South South We expect resilient and reliable services that our travellers can depend South Windsor and Windsor and GloucestershireGloucestershire Windsor and GREATER GREATER upon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • XCTL-1001 Passenger Information During Disruption Local Plan
    XCTL-1001 Passenger Information During Disruption Local Plan Synopsis This document demonstrates the process and procedures in place within CrossCountry to comply with the ATOC Code of Practice for providing Passenger Information During Disruption (PIDD). Published by UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN PRINTED Safety Team CrossCountry 5th Floor, Cannon House 18 Priory Queensway © 2016 XCTL Birmingham B4 6BS Contents A Administration ............................................................................................................. 3 B Requirements .............................................................................................................. 4 1. Purpose & Scope ........................................................................................... 4 2. People ........................................................................................................... 4 C Procedure .................................................................................................................... 5 1. Background .................................................................................................... 5 2. Aims and Objectives of PIDD ......................................................................... 5 3. Interface with Network Rail and Other Organisations ..................................... 5 4. Compliance .................................................................................................... 6 5. Key Requirements ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers Parrett and Tone Dredge – Bank Profile Restoration Environmental Statement Addendum Non-Technical Summary July 2014
    Rivers Parrett and Tone Dredge – Bank Profile Restoration Environmental Statement Addendum Non-Technical Summary July 2014 Rivers Parrett and Tone Dredge – Bank Profile Restoration ES Addendum v We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Environment Agency Horizon house, Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk www.gov.uk/environment-agency Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: © Environment Agency 2013 http://publications.environment- agency.gov.uk or our National Customer All rights reserved. This document may be Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 reproduced with prior permission of Email: enquiries@environment- the Environment Agency. agency.gov.uk. Rivers Parrett and Tone Dredge: - Bank Profile Restoration Non-Technical Summary Addendum 1 Non-Technical Summary Introduction This Non-Technical Summary (NTS) describes the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) into the likely significant effects of the dredging of a section of the Rivers Parrett and Tone, including the construction of three stockpiles to store dredged material for up to a year and bank profile restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    High-Speed Rail Development Programme 2008/9 Principal Consultant Final Report 9 October 2009 Version 5.7 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 The Study 4 1.2 Study Approach 5 1.3 The Guiding Principles for High Speed Rail Development 8 2 Corridor Status Report 10 2.1 Overview of Corridors 10 2.2 Passenger Travel Market 11 2.3 Rail Infrastructure and Services in the 5 Corridors 13 2.4 Planning Issues/Objectives 21 2.5 Findings from regional workshops 22 2.6 Core objectives for high speed rail 23 3 Network Scenarios: Initial Network Testing 24 3.1 Objective of Initial Network Testing 24 3.2 Strategic Choices and Design Criteria 24 3.3 Conclusions from the Initial Network Scenarios 30 4 Issues addressed by Corridor and Network Studies 36 4.1 Building on the initial network scenario study 36 4.2 Utilising other evidence 36 4.3 Costs of Routes to Scotland 36 4.4 Serving the second corridor north from London 37 4.5 London linkages 37 4.6 Serving South Wales and the South West 38 4.7 Transpennine 38 4.8 Scenario development 38 5 Scenarios Tested 39 5.1 Overview 39 5.2 Scenario Tests 39 5.3 Infrastructure 40 5.4 HS Service Patterns 41 5.5 Changes to Classic Services 42 6 Evaluation of Scenarios 44 6.1 Introduction 44 6.2 Evaluation criteria 44 6.3 High Speed line from London/Heathrow/HS-CT to Birmingham and Manchester 46 Page 2 of 80 6.4 High Speed line from London/ HS-CT to Sheffield/Leeds (via M11) 47 6.5 HS-NW extended to Scotland 49 6.6 Scenario 4: Incremental benefit of Heathrow link 51 6.7 Value of HS-NE to Newcastle (M1 corridor) 53 6.8 How
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Rivers Authority 2018-19 Annual Report Summary
    Somerset Rivers Authority Summary of Annual Report 2018-19 At a glance KEY POINTS FROM 2018-19 £3.81m 100s EXTRA BIGGEST spent in Somerset on of places benefit across EVER flood risk reduction Somerset use of water injection and greater resilience dredging techniques to maintain the River SuDS Parrett Unique and massive review published around of Somerset SuDS (Sustainable Drainage 15,207 AWARD Systems) highways structures WINNING given extra cleaning to Hills to Levels wins UK stop roads flooding River Prize for natural flood management Private Members’ Bill to establish SRA as Major projects backed separate legal body by SRA include 25th October: passes Third Reading further River Parrett in House of Commons dredging, River Sowy- First Somerset and begins progress King’s Sedgemoor Resilience Day through House of Drain enhancements, Lords Bridgwater Tidal Barrier, Taunton Front cover image: an amphibious excavator and a hopper barge improvements 2 head up the River Frome on SRA works in Frome About Somerset Rivers Authority DURING the devastating floods of 2013-14, Somerset decided to try a new, local approach to tackling flooding. Various partners drew up a 20 Year Flood Action Plan. Somerset Rivers Authority was launched in January 2015 to oversee that Plan and do the extra work that long experience has shown Somerset needs. There is no single answer to Somerset’s many flooding problems, and different parts of the county have different needs. That is why the SRA was set up as a partnership. Different organisations are limited in what they can do individually, but as SRA partners they can get more done by acting collectively.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Peninsula Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1
    South West Peninsula Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 1 Purpose of Route Strategies 2 Strategic themes 2 Stakeholder engagement 3 Transport Focus 3 2. The route 5 Route Strategy overview map 7 3. Current constraints and challenges 9 A safe and serviceable network 9 More free-flowing network 9 Supporting economic growth 9 An improved environment 10 A more accessible and integrated network 10 Diversionary routes 15 Maintaining the strategic road network 16 4. Current investment plans and growth potential 17 Economic context 17 Innovation 17 Investment plans 17 5. Future challenges and opportunities 23 6. Next steps 31 i R Lon ou don to Scotla te nd East London Or bital and M23 to Gatwick str Lon ategies don to Scotland West London to Wales The division of rou tes for the F progra elixstowe to Midlands mme of route strategies on t he Solent to Midlands Strategic Road Network M25 to Solent (A3 and M3) Kent Corridor to M25 (M2 and M20) South Coast Central Birmingham to Exeter A1 South West Peninsula London to Leeds (East) East of England South Pennines A19 A69 North Pen Newccaastlstlee upon Tyne nines Carlisle A1 Sunderland Midlands to Wales and Gloucest M6 ershire North and East Midlands A66 A1(M) A595 South Midlands Middlesbrougugh A66 A174 A590 A19 A1 A64 A585 M6 York Irish S Lee ea M55 ds M65 M1 Preston M606 M621 A56 M62 A63 Kingston upon Hull M62 M61 M58 A1 M1 Liver Manchest A628 A180 North Sea pool er M18 M180 Grimsby M57 A616 A1(M) M53 M62 M60 Sheffield A556 M56 M6 A46 A55 A1 Lincoln A500 Stoke-on-Trent A38 M1 Nottingham
    [Show full text]
  • South West Peninsula Route Strategy
    South West Peninsula Route Strategy April 2015 Contents 1. Introduction 5 Purpose of route strategies 5 Setting the first Road Investment Strategy 6 What we will do 7 What we will deliver 8 2. The main issues and challenges 10 Summary of the evidence report 10 3. Our Investment Priorities 12 Modernising the route 13 Maintaining the route 13 Operating the route 14 Expressways 15 4. Planning for future investment 16 The investment planning cycle 16 Preparing for the next round of route strategies 17 Contents Page !3 London to Scotland East Route London Orbital and M23 to Gatwick London to Scotland West strategies London to Wales Felixstowe to Midlands The division of routes for the Solent to Midlands programme of route strategies on the M25 to Solent (A3 and M3) Strategic Road Network Kent Corridor to M25 (M2 and M20) South Coast Central Birmingham to Exeter South West Peninsula A1 London to Leeds (East) East of England South Pennines A19 North Pennines A69 Newcastle upon Tyne Midlands to Wales and Gloucestershire Carlisle A1 Sunderland North and East Midlands M6 A1(M) South Midlands A66 Middlesbrough A595 A174 A66 Information correct at A19 13 March 2015 A590 A1 A64 A585 M6 Yo r k Leeds M1 Irish Sea M55 M65 M606 M621 Kingston upon Hull M62 A63 Preston A56 M62 A1 M61 A180 North Sea M58 M1 Grimsby A628 M18 Manchester M180 Liverpool A616 ( ) M57 A1 M M62 M60 Sheffield M53 A556 M56 A46 Lincoln M6 A1 A55 A500 M1 Stoke-on-Trent A38 Nottingham A52 Derby A50 A453 A483 A5 A38 A42 A46 Norwich M54 A47 A47 A458 A5 M42 Leicester M6 Toll A1 A12 M6 M69
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Constitution of the South West Peninsula
    Constitution of the Transport for the South West Peninsula Shadow Board THE CONSTITUTION OF THE SOUTH WEST PENINSULA SHADOW SUB- NATIONAL TRANSPORT BODY 1. Introduction 1.1 The Cities and Local Government Devolution Act makes provision for the establishment and constitution of Sub-National Transport Bodies (STB) for any area in England (outside of Greater London). 1.2 The establishment of an STB as a statutory body requires approval from Government and a Statutory Instrument must be agreed by Parliament. It has been agreed by each of the Constituent Authorities to establish a shadow Body which will operate until and if a statutory body is established. 1.3 This Constitution will govern the running of the shadow Body and will form the basis of the development of a business case for the establishment of a statutory Body. This business case will be considered for approval by the Body and the Constituent Authorities and will set out the powers that the body will be seeking, to be informed by the SWPSSTB ’s vision, Transport Strategy, and negotiations with the Department for Transport (DfT). If the business case is approved, it will be submitted to the Secretary of State for consideration. 2. Constituent Authorities 2.1 The Constituent Authorities are the following Local Transport Authorities situated within the South West Peninsula:- Cornwall Council Devon County Council Plymouth City Council Somerset County Council Torbay Council 3. Area covered 3.1 This will be the administrative area of the of the Constituent Authorities. 4. Name 4.1 The name of the Body will be the South West Peninsula Shadow Sub-National Transport Body (SWPSSTB).
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrative Option Schemes in CP5 HLOS
    Illustrative Option schemes in CP5 HLOS The Department worked with Network Rail, the train operators and the transport authorities in the major cities to build up shared information on current rail usage. As far as practicable a shared view was also agreed on forecast demand, using standard rail industry models but adjusting these where there was evidence of likely stronger growth. This forecast growth is stated as a peak demand to be met in the HLOS. The forecast growth was assessed against current plans for train service provision in 2019. Illustrative train service enhancements that provided the capacity to meet this demand were identified and modelled for the morning peak services in London, Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds. In many cases these were directly based on the work undertaken by recent rail industry Route Utilisation Strategies (RUS). In some cases, notably in Leeds and Manchester, recent Government commitments to funding electrification and capacity enhancements had happened after the RUS and so the Department worked with key stakeholders to determine the most likely train service patterns the infrastructure changes might produce. The illustrative peak train services are not what will happen; that will be guided both by the rail industry’s response to the HLOS in the Strategic Business Plan for CP5 where the industry will set out how it proposes to meet the HLOS, and by the outcome of future train operator franchise competitions. But the illustrative train services are needed for the Department to confirm that a value for money solution can be provided to meet peak demand. It is likely the rail industry will produce a more detailed and efficient solution, and in this context the illustrative option can be viewed as the simple answer that should be bettered.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrification October 2009  Foreword
    Network RUS Electrification October 2009 2 Foreword I am pleased to present this Electrification Electrification has a potentially significant role Strategy, which forms part of the Network Route to play in reducing carbon emissions from rail Utilisation Strategy (RUS). The Network RUS transport as well as improving air quality and looks at issues affecting the whole network reducing noise. Electric trains, on average, rather than in specific geographical areas. emit 20 to 30 percent less carbon than diesel trains, and their superior performance in Approximately 40 percent of the network in terms of braking and accelerating can help terms of track miles is currently electrified, reduce journey times. In addition, they provide though several main lines, much of the cross- more seats for passengers, making a greater country network, as well as key freight links contribution to increasing the overall capacity of and diversionary routes remain un-electrified. the railway. Passengers and freight operators This document therefore sets out a potential would also both benefit from an improved longer-term strategic approach to further service in other ways, such as through the electrification of the network. creation of more diversionary routes. Electrification presents a huge opportunity for In England and Wales, two options in particular the industry, for those who use the railway and – the Great Western and Midland Main Lines for the country as a whole. Our analysis shows – are shown to have high benefit to cost ratios. the long-term benefits of electrifying key parts These options, along with key strategic infill of the network, in terms of both reducing its schemes, are both presented in the proposed ongoing cost to the country and improving its strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Workforce Engagement Report: South West Peninsula
    REGIONAL WORKFORCE ENGAGEMENT REPORT: SOUTH WEST PENINSULA CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION: THE CRITICAL CARE WORKFORCE ...................................................................... 4 1.1 Critical Care in the NHS ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Projected demand ................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Census data ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Expected increase in patient and NHS need for Critical Care ......................................... 5 1.2.3 Workforce aims ............................................................................................................... 5 2. BACKGROUND TO THE ENGAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Engagement Aims ................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 UK Wide Application ............................................................................................................... 6 3. THE WORKFORCE IN THE SOUTH WEST PENINSULA ..................................................................... 7 3.1 ICM Training, Clinical Demand and Workforce in the
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 FINAL , Item 56. PDF 274 KB
    BACKGROUND TO THE EAST COAST MAIN LINE AND INTERCITY EAST COAST FRANCHISE 1 The East Coast Main Line 1.1 The East Coast Main Line (ECML) is one of two high-capacity north-south trunk routes that run between Scotland and London. Whilst not formally defined, it is broadly accepted as being the rail line from Edinburgh southwards via Newcastle, York, Doncaster, and Peterborough to London Kings Cross. The mainline from Leeds to Doncaster via Wakefield Westgate (often referred to the West Riding section) is also regarded as part of the East Coast Main Line. 1.2 Whilst the route serves an important function for long-distance Anglo-Scottish inter-city passenger trains, the InterCity East Coast franchise operates fewer than half the trains on the route. It is a multi-functional railway, accommodating many other local and regional services, together with freight traffic along various parts of its length. For the City Region this includes: TransPennine Express services on the route north of York to Middlesbrough, Newcastle, and in future, Edinburgh; InterCity Cross Country services north of York to the north east and Scotland, and also south of York and Leeds towards Sheffield, the midlands and south west; open access operators: . Grand Central services between West Yorkshire, Doncaster and London; . Grand Central services between the north east, York and London . Hull Trains services between Hull, Selby, Doncaster and London. Local services between Leeds and Doncaster / Sheffield via Wakefield Westgate. 1.3 The route’s role in the “heavy-lifting” of commuter traffic into Leeds itself, and increasingly into Wakefield, Doncaster and York too, is vital to the economic success of the region, and to providing socially inclusive and sustainable access to work and education opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Oncology Training in the South West Peninsula
    Clinical Oncology Training in the South West Peninsula Why should you choose to train in Clinical Oncology in the Peninsula? For a start, Peninsula was ranked 1st in England for overall satisfaction for Clinical Oncology in the 2015 and 2016 GMC survey. Where else can you receive first class training during the day and visit the beach after work? The excellent standard of training is reflected in a high pass rate for the FRCR exams and the presentation of the Oncology Registrars’ Forum Trainer Award to one of our consultants in 2014. Training is provided at Derriford Hospital in Plymouth, the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital in Exeter and the Royal Cornwall Hospital in Truro. A typical 5 year rotation would involve 3 years in Plymouth, 1 year in Exeter and 1 year in Truro although there is some flexibility. There are currently 10 Clinical Oncology Specialty Registrars in the Peninsula. During the course of the rotation registrars will receive training in state of the art radiotherapy techniques including intensity modulated radiotherapy, image guidance, gating, 4DCT, stereotactic radiosurgery, high dose rate and low dose rate brachytherapy. All centres on the rotation have active clinical trials units and trainees will be encouraged to take part in research and quality improvement projects. There are no Medical Oncology trainees in the Peninsula, so Clinical Oncology trainees gain a broad experience in prescribing systemic therapy for all tumour sites. During the ST3 year trainees are supported to attend a basic sciences course in preparation for the FRCR part 1 examinations. Recent trainees have attended the three Biological Basis of Cancer Therapy courses run by the Christie in Manchester, each of which lasts one week.
    [Show full text]