Oakland Apartments Designation Study – Submittal for State Historic Preservation Office Comment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DESIGNATION STUDY OAKLAND APARTMENTS 213 9 TH STREET SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS NOVEMBER 5, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE MINNEAPOLIS CITY PLANNING CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS COMMISSION Jacob Frey, Mayor Sam Rockwell, President Lisa Bender, Council President Matthew Brown Andrea Jenkins, Council Vice President Jean Coleman Alondra Cano Jono Cowgill Phillipe Cunningham Kim Ellison Jeremiah Ellison Ryan Kronzer Steve Fletcher Alissa Luepke-Pier Lisa Goodman Alyssa Olson Cam Gordon Council Member Jeremy Schroeder Andrew Johnson Amy Sweasy Linea Palmisano Kevin Reich DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ECONOMIC Jeremy Schroeder DEVELOPMENT (CPED) Abdi Warsame David Frank, CPED Executive Director Stephen Poor, Director of Development Services Kimberly Holien, Manager, Land Use, Design MINNEAPOLIS HERITAGE and Preservation Team PRESERVATION COMMISSION Andrea Burke, Historic Preservation Supervisor Ginny Lackovic, Chair John Smoley, Ph.D., CPED, Principal Investigator Diana Dyste Laurel Fritz Barbara Howard Jesse Kling Linda Mack Kimberly Sandbulte Ian Stade Madelyn Sundberg Claire VanderEyk 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 1 Mayor and City Council of the City of Minneapolis .................................................................................. 1 Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission ...................................................................................... 1 Minneapolis City Planning Commission .................................................................................................... 1 Department of Community Planning and Economic Development (CPED) ............................................. 1 Designation Study Purpose and Background ................................................................................................ 5 Basic Property Information ........................................................................................................................... 6 PART 1: PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY .................................................................................... 7 Parcel Location, Shape, and Size ............................................................................................................... 7 Description of building(s) on the property ............................................................................................... 7 Description of the Primary Structure .................................................................................................... 7 Description of Interior Features ............................................................................................................ 7 Description of Landscape and Landscape Features .............................................................................. 7 PART 2: DISCUSSION OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................................... 8 PART 3: RATIONALE FOR LOCAL HISTORICAL DESIGNATION ..................................................................... 10 Designation Criteria ................................................................................................................................ 10 Integrity of historic resource .................................................................................................................. 12 Relationship to the body of locally-designated properties in Minneapolis ............................................ 13 Relationship to the Minneapolis Preservation Plan ............................................................................ 13 Comprehensive and Long-Range Planning ......................................................................................... 13 National Register Status ...................................................................................................................... 15 State Designation ................................................................................................................................ 15 Period of Significance .......................................................................................................................... 15 PART 4: REGISTRATION AND CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION .................................................................. 16 PART 5: PHOTOGRAPHS, DRAWINGS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS ............................................................. 19 END NOTES .................................................................................................................................................. 42 • Appendix A: Demolition of a Historic Resource staff report • Appendix B: HPC actions from demolition hearing • Appendix C: Letter to SHPO • Appendix D: Letter from SHPO • Appendix E: Memorandum to City Planning Commission • Appendix F: Staff report to Heritage Preservation Commission • Appendix G: HPC actions from designation hearing (forthcoming) 3 • Appendix H: Request for Council Action (forthcoming) • Appendix I: Zoning and Planning Committee actions (forthcoming) • Appendix J: Actions of the City Council (forthcoming) • Appendix J: Public comment since publication of the nomination staff report (forthcoming) • Appendix K: Public comment since publication of the designation staff report (forthcoming) 4 DESIGNATION STUDY PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND On December 5, 2018, property owner Dave Gonyea submitted a complete Demolition of a Historic Resource application to demolish the subject property at 213 9th Street South. On January 9, 2019, the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) denied the Demolition of a Historic resource application, placed the property under interim protection, and directed the Planning Director to prepare or cause to be prepared this designation study. This Study is intended to fulfill the requirements for local historical designation outlined in Title 23, Chapter 599.230 of the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances. The study is based on a review of resources which includes a 1980 City of Minneapolis designation study, which received the approval of the Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission and Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office; a 1981 National Register of Historic Places nomination form; a 1989 survey of downtown properties deemed the building “very critical” as the first Minneapolis multiple-family residence with common entrance; a 2000 context statement for downtown Minneapolis which identified the Oakland Apartments as the last remaining example of a small apartment building for middle class residents from 1890-1910; a 2008 landmark nomination application from author Elizabeth Vandam, well known for her expertise in Harry Wild Jones’ work; and a 2011 reconnaissance-level survey of the central core of Minneapolis which recommended the property for intensive-level evaluation. 5 BASIC PROPERTY INFORMATION CURRENT NAME Oakland Apartments HISTORIC NAME Oakland, Oaklands, The Oakland, Oakland Apartments CURRENT ADDRESS 213 9th Street South HISTORIC ADDRESS 213-215 9th Street South ORIGINAL 1889 CONSTRUCTION DATE ORIGINAL unknown CONTRACTOR ORIGINAL ARCHITECT, Harry Wild Jones MASTER BUILDER, ENGINEER, DESIGNER, ARTIST, OR CRAFTSMEN HISTORIC USE Six-unit apartment building PROPOSED USE Multiple-family dwelling WARD: Ward # 7 NEIGHBORHOOD: Downtown West 6 PART 1: PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY PARCEL LOCATION, SHAPE, AND SIZE The subject lot is a narrow, rectangular, 40’x165’ lot located mid-block in Minneapolis’ central business district (Figure 2). DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING(S) ON THE PROPERTY Description of the Primary Structure DATE(S) OF CONSTRUCTION: William P. Burnett pulled the Building Permit to construct this multi- family residence on June 20, 1889 for an estimated cost of $20,000. The schedule estimated construction would occur over the summer and be complete by September 20.1 SIZE AND MASSING: The subject property is a three-story residence laid out in a compound plan, two units wide by three units deep (Figure 1). LOCATION, PLACEMENT, AND ORIENTATION OF BUILDING ON THE SITE: The building is centered on the northern edge of the lot and faces north toward downtown Minneapolis. Situated mid-block, between 2nd and 3rd Avenue South, the subject building and its western neighbor, the League of Catholic Women Building, are the last remaining buildings on a block dominated by surface parking lots (Figure 2). ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Harry Wild Jones designed the building in the Richardsonian Romanesque style KNOWN ORIGINAL ELEMENTS THAT ARE DETERIORATED OR MISSING: The subject property has suffered from a number of fires during its one hundred thirty-year history. The only extant historic features on the exterior of the building are its masonry walls, front staircase, and two porthole stained- glass windows, currently removed for repair. Description of Interior Features The subject property has suffered a number of fires during its one hundred thirty-year history. Few historic features remain inside the building, therefore its interior is not suitable for designation. Description of Landscape and Landscape Features One non-historic deciduous tree and a small patch of sparse grass at the front of the lot constitute the only landscaping on site. 7 PART 2: DISCUSSION OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE Residential Development in Minneapolis Oakland Apartments has long been recognized as one of the first multiple-unit residential buildings built in Minneapolis, emblematic of the