DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluating the Ownership, Governance Structures, And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluating the Ownership, Governance Structures, And Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (COMCEC) Evaluating the Ownership, Governance Structures and Performances of Ports in the OIC Member Countries COMCEC COORDINATION OFFICE January 2015 Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (COMCEC) Evaluating the Ownership, Governance Structures and Performances of Ports in the OIC Member Countries COMCEC COORDINATION OFFICE January 2015 This report has been commissioned by the COMCEC Coordination Office to Dr. Khalid BICHOU from Bichou Consulting. Views and opinions expressed in the report are solely those of the author(s) and do not represent the official views of the COMCEC Coordination Office or the Member States of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Excerpts from the report can be made as long as references are provided. All intellectual and industrial property rights for the report belong to the COMCEC Coordination Office. This report is for individual use and it shall not be used for commercial purposes. Except for purposes of individual use, this report shall not be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including printing, photocopying, CD recording, or by any physical or electronic reproduction system, or translated and provided to the access of any subscriber through electronic means for commercial purposes without the permission of the COMCEC Coordination Office. For further information please contact: COMCEC Coordination Office Necatibey Caddesi No:110/A 06100 Yücetepe Ankara/TURKEY Phone : 90 312 294 57 10 Fax : 90 312 294 57 77 Web : www.comcec.org Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Study Background .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Scope of the Study .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Approach and Methodology........................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Structure of the Report .................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction to Port Systems ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Facilities and Services ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Terminal Operations ......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3. Hinterland and Logistics Extensions ...................................................................................................... 10 2.4. Ownership and Institutional Structures ............................................................................................... 11 3. Market Structure and Competitive Performance .............................................................................. 15 3.1. Sector Capacity and Services ...................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.1. Maritime Transport ........................................................................................................................................ 15 3.1.2. Ports ...................................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2. Sector Developments and Trends ............................................................................................................ 20 3.2.1. Shifts in Trade Patterns and Increased Share of South-South Trade ....................................... 21 3.2.2. Larger Ships and Cargo Concentration .................................................................................................. 21 3.2.3. Containerisation, Automation and Technological Change ............................................................ 22 3.2.4. Global Consolidation Strategies ................................................................................................................ 22 3.2.5. Developments in International Maritime Infrastructure .............................................................. 23 3.2.6. Focus on Performance Differentials and Competitive Benchmarks ......................................... 23 3.2.7. Emphasis on Port Safety and Security ................................................................................................... 23 3.2.8. Relationship to Landside Logistics, Hinterland and City-Interface .......................................... 24 3.2.9. Port Environmental Concerns and Climate Change Impacts ....................................................... 24 3.2.10.Ports Skills Gap ................................................................................................................................................. 25 4. Ownership Structure and Institutional Performance ...................................................................... 27 4.1. Organisation of the Port Sector in OIC countries .............................................................................. 27 4.1.1. The Landlord Model ....................................................................................................................................... 27 4.1.2. The Public Service Model ............................................................................................................................. 28 4.1.3. The Hybrid Landlord-Public Service Model ........................................................................................ 28 4.1.4. The Autonomous Model ............................................................................................................................... 29 4.1.5. Other Models ..................................................................................................................................................... 29 4.1.6. Institutional Structure of Port Terminals under Study .................................................................. 30 4.2. Private Sector Participation and OIC Ports .......................................................................................... 31 4.2.1. Forms of Private Sector Participation in Ports................................................................................... 32 4.2.2. Economic Benefits of Private Sector Participation ........................................................................... 35 4.2.3. Private Sector Participation in OIC Ports .............................................................................................. 36 4.3. Analysis of Institutional Port Performance ......................................................................................... 38 4.3.1. Institutional Structure and Fragmentation.......................................................................................... 38 4.3.2. Ownership and Service Commercialisation ......................................................................................... 40 5. Regulatory Framework and Governance Performance................................................................... 43 5.1. Regulatory Performance ................................................................................................................. 43 5.1.1. Technical Regulation...................................................................................................................................... 43 5.1.2. Economic Regulation ..................................................................................................................................... 47 6. Operational Structure and Port Efficiency ........................................................................................... 53 6.1. Methodology and Data .................................................................................................................... 53 6.1.1. Methodology ...................................................................................................................................................... 53 6.1.2. Data and Variables .......................................................................................................................................... 54 6.2. Efficiency Results and Analysis ..................................................................................................... 55 6.2.1. DEA Benchmarking Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 56 6.2.2. Productivity Change Analysis .................................................................................................................... 64 6.3. Analysis of Logistical Inefficiency ............................................................................................................ 71
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modernising Trust Ports [Second Edition] I
    Modernising Trust Ports [second edition] i. Introduction This is the second edition of Modernising Trust Ports (MTP). The first was published in 2000 by the then Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, and followed a review of the trust ports sector that focused principally on corporate governance and accountability. That review highlighted a need for a general improvement in the openness and accountability with which trust ports conduct their business, and prompted the Department to stipulate governance guidelines which it expected all trust port boards to use as the benchmark of best practice — Modernising Trust Ports. A similar exercise was undertaken with respect to municipal ports. The general improvement sought by the Government has been widely in evidence in the years since then, and the sector should be congratulated for the considerable strides it has taken in this direction. In 2006 the successor Department for Transport embarked upon a thorough review of ports policy, in light of devolution in the UK planning and political systems, and the evolution of global trading patterns. The review looked among other things at the future of the mixed ports sector, including the outlook for trust ports in the coming decades. This was set against the backdrop of the decision by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) in 2001 to classify the largest trust ports as public corporations, which had the effect of placing those ports’ borrowing on the Department’s accounts, and the relevant ports' subsequent applications, now on hold, to remove themselves from perceived public sector controls through the pursuit of appropriate Harbour Revision Orders (HROs).
    [Show full text]
  • Newlyn Harbour: Historical Developments ______
    Newlyn Harbour: Historical Developments ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ NEWLYN HARBOUR: Historical Developments from Favoured Landing Beach to Premier Fishing Harbour August 1932 – Newlyn Harbour and Town Looking North West The Old Quay, South and North Piers (Source: https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW039842 ) Researched and compiled by Maritime Archaeology Trust Volunteer Roger Burns 1 of 19 Newlyn Harbour: Historical Developments ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ NEWLYN HARBOUR Historical Developments from Favoured Landing Beach to Premier Fishing Harbour Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Location ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Geology and related characteristics .......................................................................................................... 4 Storms and Surges .................................................................................................................................... 4 Newlyn Harbour – The Old Quay and Fishing ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South West Ports Association
    Chairman: Cdr. David Vaughan O.B.E. (Teignmouth) Vice-Chairman: Hon. Secretary: Duncan Paul (Falmouth Harbour Commissioners) Hon. Treasurer: Sandra Lynch (Cattewater Harbour Commissioners) SOUTH WEST REGIONAL PORTS ASSOCIATION A Directory of Ports and Harbours in the South West Region September 2016 South West Regional Ports Association Directory September 2016 The aims of the SOUTH WEST REGIONAL PORTS ASSOCIATION To provide a forum for ports and harbours within the South West Region to come together for regular discussions on topics affecting ports in the region. To provide self-help advice and expertise to members. To provide members with representation at all levels on all topics affecting port and harbour operations. To co-ordinate attention on issues including environment, leisure and tourism, road and rail links, contingency plans and future development of the South West. To support and encourage the British Ports Association. To improve trade using South West ports, particularly within the E.C. To establish link between ports in the region and the many leisure sure bodies including R.Y.A. Cruising Club, R.N.S.A. diving, fishing, power boating, rowing, 'et skiing and other organisations using harbours. To provide to the media and others, information and statistics on the ports industry. To support other bodies and organisations in ensuring the South West receives the necessary support and encouragement from Government and the E.C. To improve operations and co-operations between South West port members and Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, County Fire Brigades, H.M. Customs and H.M. Coastguards vigorously supporting initiatives on crime, drug smuggling and safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Privatisation: Ownership Involvement by External Companies
    MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MARITIME SCIENCE MASTER DISSERTATION Academic year 2017 – 2018 Port privatisation: Ownership involvement by external companies Alan Johnson Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements Supervisor: Prof. dr. Theo Notteboom for the degree of: Master of Science in Maritime Science Assessor: Prof. Daan Schalck PERMISSION I declare that the content of this Master dissertation may be consulted or reproduced, provided that the source is referenced. Alan Johnson PREFACE This Master dissertation marks the conclusion of my advanced studies in the Master of Science in Maritime Science. I would like to explicitly thank certain people who have contributed to the realisation of this thesis. In the first place, I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Prof. dr. Theo Notteboom and co-promotor Prof. Daan Schalck for their confidence and valuable feedback. Their willingness and assistance have resulted in the accomplishment of this dissertation. Furthermore, my appreciation goes to the interviewees for their cooperation and insights as well as to the respondents for completing the survey regarding my qualitative research. Many thanks go to my friends who are always available for advice. Their relentless and unconditional enthusiasm mean a lot to me. Last but not least, I am deeply grateful to my parents for the opportunity they have offered me to follow and finalise this additional master programme. Their exceptional support and motivation are extremely valuable for me. Alan Johnson Ghent, 24 January 2018 I II
    [Show full text]
  • 'Gateways for Growth'
    South West Ports ’Gateways for Growth’ PRODUCED FOR THE SOUTH WEST REGIONAL PORTS AssOCIATION BY THE BRITISH PORTS AssOCIATION CONTENTS Ports in the South West PORTS IN THE SOUTH WESt – 3 PORTS IN THE SOUTH WEST “GATEWAYS FOR GROWth”. The region served by the South West 8 COMMERCIAL SECTOrs Regional Development Agency (SWRDA) stretches from the tip of the South West 16 PORTS - THE FUTURE Peninsular to the Severn Estuary and Poole Harbour, a coastal route of 700miles. It has more coastline than any other English region, making its maritime economy fundamental to economic growth. SUPPORTING THE REGION Ports and harbours in the South West have a unique role. They are gateways into and out of the region and provide a base for trade and employment serving local, regional and national markets. South West ports and harbours are part of a almost 19m tonnes of cargo. As a UK ports industry which is the largest, and proportion of the national total, this is 3.4 arguably the most diverse, in Europe. More per cent of all UK imports and exports by than 95 per cent of UK imports and exports tonnage. This however, is a small part of pass through British ports. Our economy is the story. The figure does not include the therefore heavily dependent on their vitality value and impact of the leisure industry, and efficiency. passenger traffic, the sizeable numbers of fish landings in the South West or the role It is estimated that port and harbour related that harbours play in attracting tourists to activity, including cargo handling and the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Roundtable: Competition in Ports and Port Services 2011
    Competition in Ports and Port Services 2011 The OECD Competition Committee debated competition in ports and port services in June 2011. This document includes an executive summary of that debate and the documents from the meeting: an analytical note by the OECD Secretariat and written submissions from Bulgaria, Chile, Estonia, Finland, the European Union, France, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, the Russian Federation, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Chinese Taipei, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States (Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission), as well as an aide-memoire of the discussion. Ports, whether maritime, inland or river ports, are important pieces of infrastructure that serve a wide range of customers including freight shippers, ferry operators and private boats. One of the main functions of ports is facilitating the domestic and international trade of goods, often on a large scale. Competition in maritime ports and port services is central to countries with significant volumes of maritime- based trade. Inland and river ports can also play important transport roles within countries in particular for heavy or bulky goods where alternative ways of transport are more costly. Ports are, therefore, important for the functioning of the world economy and effective competition in ports and port services plays an important role in the final prices of many products. The roundtable discussion focussed on market definition, regulatory reforms and antitrust enforcement in ports
    [Show full text]
  • Lerwick Port Authority Annual Review 2017-18 Dales Voe Base Britain’S Project Support & Offshore Decommissioning ‘Top’ Port
    LERWICK PORT AUTHORITY ANNUAL REVIEW 2017-18 DALES VOE BASE BRITAIN’S PROJECT SUPPORT & OFFSHORE DECOMMISSIONING ‘TOP’ PORT OPEN STORAGE AND LAYDOWN SITES SHETLAND ISLANDS COUNCIL INCINERATOR WASTE-TO-ENERGY PLANT RECYCLING PLANT CONTENTS GREENHEAD BASE DREDGED TO 9.0m PROJECT SUPPORT & OFFSHORE DECOMMISSIONING MISSION AND VALUES ............................................................ 4 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT .......................................................6 DREDGED TO 9.0m HEOGAN FISHMEAL CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S STATEMENT ..........................................8 & OIL FACTORY GREMISTA QUAY 2017 HARBOUR STATISTICS ...................................................9 FISH PROCESSING OUR BUSINESS ..........................................................................10 LERWICK NORTH MARINA HARBOUR OUR PEOPLE ............................................................................. 12 HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT AND QUALITY ......... 18 MAIR’S PIER BRESSAY NEW FISHMARKET LOCATION OBJECTIVES UPDATE .............................................................20 (COMPLETION 2019) 2018 OBJECTIVES & TARGETS ............................................ 22 RO-RO TERMINAL BUNKERING HOLMSGARTH QUAY SECTOR HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................. 24 F ER DREDGED TO 9.0m RY T SPOTLIGHT ON: FENDERING SYSTEM .............................. 32 O AB E MORRISON DOCK RD EE SPOTLIGHT ON: ORGANISATIONAL REBRAND ............. 34 CARGO JETTY N SHEARER’S QUAY ICE PLANT 2018 CAPITAL PROJECTS .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trust Port Study Key Findings and Recommendations
    Trust Port Study Key Findings and Recommendations Department for Transport, May 2016 Contents Ministerial Foreword 4 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 7 Background to the Study 7 Background to Trust Ports 8 2. Secretary of State Appointments 12 Current Model 12 Discussion 14 Conclusions 15 Recommendations 15 3. Relationship with the Department for Transport 18 Current Model 18 Discussion 19 Conclusions 19 Recommendations 19 4. Stakeholder Engagement 21 Current Model 21 Discussion 22 Conclusion 24 Recommendations 24 5. Investment Capability 25 Current Model 25 Discussion 27 Conclusions 28 Recommendations 28 6. Conclusions and next steps 29 Overall effectiveness 29 Next Steps 30 2 Annex A: List of recommendations 31 Annex B: Summary of responses from trust ports who are not Major Trust Ports to questions in letter from DfT of 1 August 2014 33 Annex C: Lists of Trust Ports in England and Wales 37 3 Ministerial Foreword The fifty two trust ports in England and Wales play a very important role in our national and regional economies as well as in local communities. They range from some of our largest nationally significant ports playing a key role in our economy, to medium-sized ones that play an important role in regional economies to the smallest ones where the harbour can be the focal point of a community. The trust port model is a longstanding and a unique one. These ports are independent organisations that operate commercially without government support. They are accountable to stakeholders including port users, local communities and Government, who in some ways play the same role of shareholders in a private company.
    [Show full text]
  • Fowey Estuary Management Plan (Pdf)
    FOWEY ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012 - 2017 FOWEY ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP Contents Fowey Estuary Management Plan Management Estuary Fowey Contents ...................................................................................................................2 Abbreviations...........................................................................................................3 Definitions ................................................................................................................4 Section 1 Introduction & Vision ..............................................................................5 Section 2 Background .............................................................................................6 Section 3 The Management Plan Area....................................................................7 Section 4 Management Framework ........................................................................9 Section 5 Management Policies............................................................................14 Section 6 Landscape Conservation......................................................................15 Section 7 Nature Conservation .............................................................................16 Section 8 Historic Assets ......................................................................................19 Section 9 Commercial Activities...........................................................................21 Section 10 Fisheries ..............................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Port Management Structures and Ownership Models
    PORT REFORM TOOLKIT SECOND EDITION MODULE 3 ALTERNATIVE PORT MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES AND OWNERSHIP MODELS THE WORLD BANK © 2007 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank All rights reserved. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF) or the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Neither PPIAF nor the World Bank guarantees the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of PPIAF or the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this work is copyrighted. Copyright is held by the World Bank on behalf of both the World Bank and PPIAF. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including copying, recording, or inclusion in any information storage and retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the World Bank. MODULE 3 The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly. For all other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, please contact the Office of the Publisher, World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail [email protected]. ISBN-10: 0-8213-6607-6 ISBN-13: 978-0-8213-6607-3 eISBN: 0-8213-6608-4 eISBN-13: 978-0-8213-6608-0 DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6607-3 MODULE THREE CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • South-West England: Seaton to the Roseland Peninsula
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 10 South-west England: Seaton to the Roseland Peninsula edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the Project Steering Group. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S. Pullen WWF UK (Worldwide Fund for Nature) N.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Governance in the Uk: Planning Without Policy
    PORT GOVERNANCE IN THE UK: PLANNING WITHOUT POLICY Jason Monios Transport Research Institute, Edinburgh Napier University Merchiston Campus, Edinburgh, EH10 5DT, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] This is the pre-published version of the text. The final published paper can be found at: Monios, J. (2017). Port governance in the UK: planning without policy. Research in Transportation Business and Management. 22: 78-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.10.006 Abstract The UK’s highly privatised port system means that, while many of the issues in the port governance literature relevant to port concessions do not arise here, the respective roles of harbour authorities and port operators continue to be questioned. The concern in the UK is whose role it should be to monitor the capacity and service quality of the port sector, including how to govern the ways in which the different classes of port stakeholder interact. This paper describes and discusses the UK port sector, the main ports and cargo types, the governance system and recent developments. Recent changes in national policy are reviewed and potential new developments in governance are considered, reflecting on how the UK case represents some key theoretical considerations regarding infrastructure governance within a modern political system favouring private ownership and operation of the transport sector. Key words: UK; port governance; private; trust; container; policy; planning 1 1. Introduction The UK is unusual in its highly privatised port system, with approximately 69% of tonnage handled by privately owned and operated ports. The result is that many of the discussions in other countries about port concessions do not arise here.
    [Show full text]