<<

and TANU-H-71 -OD1 c. 2 Development System

CiaCmaatse Col'Y gyesGrant. Depositot7

~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~

0 ~ ~

e% ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ q ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ yO ~ P ..:-' j

~ 0

~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~

~ g o & ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~

~ ~

~ 0 C 0 r ~ 0

~ ~ ~ r

~ ~

~ ~ Port and Harbor Daveloi,'mentSystem Architecture Research Center Phase1- Design GuldeNnas College of Architecture 8 Work Repel Environmental Design Texas A&M University August 1971 TAMU- SG -71-236 College Station, Texas 77843

C<~CU~gTING CPPY Sea Grant Depository Acknowledgments

This project was partially fundedby NOAA, We wish to thank the personsand departments National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminis- who furnished us information: tration, Office of Sea Grants, Departmentof Mr. Leonard E. Hassil Commerce,through institutional grant GH-101 Prolect Manager made to TexasA8M University. Port and Cargo SystemsCommittee National Research Council Washington, D.C. Thework on the Portand Harbor Development Systemproject is the resultof the effortsof Mr. Paul A. Amundsen several groups: Executive Director The American Association of Port Authorities Architecture ResearchCenter, ResearchTeam: Washington, D.C, RussellL. Stogsdill, ResearchArchitect, Project Director Mr. Frank McCurry John Langston, ResearchAssistant Santa Fe Railroad Arie Schinnar, ResearchAssistant Amarillo, Texas Mike Willingham,Graduate Research Assistant Linda Escamilla, Secretary Mr. C.J. Calvin Judith Hlubucek, Secretary The Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association Linda Jarnison, Secretary Washington, D.C. Lucinda Kerley, Librarian Mr. H.J, Rome Research Advisors: Superintendentof Docks Prof. Gunter Schmitz, Director of Project Mr. Verdun Daste Development Publicity Representative Randolph Waligura, ResearchArchitect New Orleans Centroport New Orleans, Louisiana Administrative support: Sea Grant Program Office Dr. Charles C. Bates Willis H. Clark, Assistant Director Science Advisor DonaI d Walsh, ProgramAssociate U.S. Coast Guarcl RogerD. Anderson, Marine Educationand Washington, D.C. Training Coordinator Allen Martin, Administrative Assistant Mr. George W. Altvater LeathaMiloy, Headand Editor, Departmentof Deputy Director Marine Resources information Port of Houston Janet Howe, Associate Editor Houston, Texas Ka thi Jensen, Assistant Editor RosemaryE. Hoykin, ProgramAssociate Col. J.S. Newman Executive Director of Civil Works Departmentof the Army Office of the Chief of Engineers Washington, D.C.

Mr . C . S. Devoy Port Director and General Manager Port of Galveston Galveston, Texas Direct'o rs and staffs of the following : Port of Dublin, Ireland United States: Port of , China Port of , Washington SouthAfrican Railwaysand Port of New York, New York Port of Kitimat, British Columbia , Cal ifornia Port of Halifax, Nova Scotia Port of Tampa, Florida Port of Antwerp, Belgium Port of Hampton Roads, Virginia Nat'ional Harbor Board, Canada , Portof London, England , California Portof Liverpool, England Port of , California Port of Piraeus, Greece Port of Baltimore, Maryland Port oF Bangkok, Thialand , Massachusett's Port oF Bristol, England Port of Phila d elphia, Pennsy I vania Port of Lagos, Nigeria Port oF Catoosa, Okla homa Port. of Beaumont, Texas Special Credits Port of Galveston, Texas Appreciationis extendedfo the following Port of Port Arthur, Texas individualsfor supportand encouragement: Port of Corpus Christi, Texas EdwardJ. Romieniec, Dean, College of Port of New Orleans, Louisiana Architecture and EnvironmentalDesign, Foreign Dr. John C. Calhoun, Jr., Director, Sea Port of Lisbon, Portugal Grant Program Office . Port of Amsterdam, Netherlands Port of Rotterdam, Netherlands Special thanksto the Followingpersons for Port of Dover, England their time and efforts in editing fhe text: Port of , France . Roger D. Anderson, Sea Grant Program Port of Calcutta, India Office Port of Auckland, New Zealand ' Dan Bragg, Industrial Economics Research Port of Copenhagen, Denmark Division Israel , Israel ' John 0. Greer, Architecture Research Port of Hamburg,West Germany Center Port of Ghent, Belgium ' Gerry Maffei, College of Architecture and Port of Bremen, Germany Environmental Design Port of Helsinki, Finland ' Ahn Miloy, industrial EconomicsResearch Port of Venice, Italy Division Port of Hanko, Finland ' Don Sweeney, Architecture ResearchCenter. Port of Sydney, Au stral ia Port of Wellington, New Zealand Port of Christchurch, New Zealand Port of Bergen, Norway Port of Melbourne, Australia Port of Manchester, England Port of Stockholm, Sweden Port of Belfast, Northern ireland Part of Bombay, India Port of Osaka, 1 Table of Contents

1 Table of Contents

2 introduction

3 Port 3.1 Types 3.1.1 Geographi ca I Analysis 3.1.2 Cargo

3.2 Location 3.2.1 Physical Factors 3.2.2 Socio-economic

3.3 Administration 3.3.1 Owning Organizations 12 3.3.2 Operations

3.4 Transportation 3.4,1 Land 18 3.4,2 Airborne 3.4.3 Waterborne

3.5 Cargo Handling 3.5.1 Methods 32 3.5,2 Equipment

3.6 Labor 3.6.1 Type 3.6.2 Structuref'Organization 3.6.3 Occupational Structure 3.6.4 Age 3.6.5 Mechanization 3.6.6 Safety 3.6.7 Work hours 3.6.8 Wages 3.6.9 Amenities and Welfare 3.6.10 Manpower 3.6.11 Training

3.7 Support Industry

3.8 Safety 3.8.1 Types of Fires 50 3.8.2 Firefighting Agents 3.8.3 Fire Prevention 3.8.4 Medical 3.8,5 Navigational Aids 3.8.6 Marine Safety

3,9 Finance 3,9.1 Ob jectives 3.9.2 Revenue 4 Planning 4.1 Design and 4.1.1 Decision 58 ConstrUction 4.1,2 Prel iminary 4.1,3 Site investigation 4.1.4 General Review 4.l.5 Harbor and 4,1.6 Brea kwa ters 4.1.7 Terminal s 4.1.8 Offshore Structures 4.1.9 Bvil ding s 4.1,10 Dock Types 4.1. l 1 Dry Docks 4 ~1.12 Piles 4.1.13 FenderSystems 4.1.14 Mooring 4.1.15 Dolphins 4.1.16 Moles, Trestles and Catwa I ks

5 Trends 102

6 Concepts 6.1 ExistIng Port 105 6.2 interim Port 115 6.3 Trans-Port 125

7 Glossary 132

8 Bibl iography 2 Introduction Perhapsno aspect of modern times is as portsin differentstages of development.Nau- pervasiveand influential as change, This tical terms,perhaps unusual ta the uninitiated, century has been marked from its beginning are explained in the Glossary, Part 7. by far-reaching change-- scientific, tech- nical, social, political, even cultural, The synergisticeffect of changeacting on change has increased Its rate, so that the ability to cope with and plan for changehas become a central feature of modern exis- fence.

The problemsthat can result from the mobility fo respondfo changeare well illustrated by the designof manyof the world's portsand harbors. Until recently thesefacilities could be designed by looking backward for examples from the past. But rapid communication and the economicpressures of world trade have so shortened the gap between scientific break- through and technological implementation that modelsfrom antiquity no longer suffice. Con- tainerization, supersized vessels, oceangoing barges and new cargo handling techniques are but few of the most recent developments to which ports must respond. Another, spawned by necessityand massivesocial pressure,is the need for preserving environmental balance.

Clearly, ports and harbors of the future must be planned and designed to accommodate change. The purposeof this report is to aid those who are involved in and responsible for port and harbor planning and design. If is hoped that through the use of the guidelines presented herein, marine facilities may be de- veloped which are more rational, more flexible and thus more functional .

Thenext section of the report, Part 3, pre- sents an analysis of present harbor design features. Part 4 describesstep by step re- quirements in port design and construction. Importanttrends in marineand transportation technology are described in Part 5, and Part 6 suggestsplanning and design concepts for 3 Port Analysis 3.1 Types

3.1.1 Geographical

3 .1 .1 .1 Coastal Port 3.1.1.2 CoastalPorts are thosewhich are affected by Inland portsare thosewhich have little or no tidal rangesand are readily accessibleto tidal effects. Theseports are locatedup rivers openwater. Theyprovide the following or channels, They provide the following ad- advantages: vantages: ~ deepwater for large vessels ~ protection ~ expansioncapabilities on water and land ~ water access to interior maximumaccessibility for coastaI and reduced transportation costs overseas trade ' limited tidal action. ' desirable locations for industrial develop- ment,

Reproducedby permissionoF the Port of Reproducedby permissionof the Port of Hamburg, Wellington, New Zealand Germany Disadvantagesof coastal ports: Disadvantagesof inland ports: ~ tidal action - unseasonaI rise and fall of rivers or channels sl I ting ~ accumulation of sedimentary material - unprotected. limitsan vessel size.

Coastal port development fol laws two basic Inland port developmentfollows two basic forms: forms: A . Seawardexpansion A . Restrictive

B, Inland expansion. B. Unrestrictive . 3.1.2 Cargo

3.1.2,1 Conta inerized Classification of ocean borne general cargo The container provides a sound protective suitable for is listed in three covering for cargo and provides an econom- general classifications: ical systemfor transferof cargo from one A . Prime generally commoditiesof high transportationmode to another. value with relatively high shippingrates. Theseprime commoditiespossess physical Containers come in five basic types: reefer, attributes which permit them to be effi- dry, insulated,vented and special . They ciently packedin containers. Many of these are manufactured in 10 foot increments, commoditiesare highly susceptibleto damage ranging from 10 to 40 feet,and are 8 feet or pilferage. Examplesof prime cargoes are tall and 8 feet wide. l iquars, wines, pharmaceuticals and non- Advantages of containerization are: bul ky items. reduced ship turnaround time B. Suitable - generally commodities of ' less damage moderate value with shipping rates less than ' less theft those for prime commodities. This classifi" ~ transit shed not required cation has a modest susceptibility to damage ' containers can be stacked, or pilferage. Exampleof this type include wood shingles, wire products and bagged Disadvantages of containerization are: coffee. Other type cargoes that fit in this ' large amount of land area for container category are those that could be contaminated, marshaI Iing and storage required such as bagged flour or cargoes that incur ' older vesselsnot designed to handle such labor penalty chargessuch as green hidesand large units carbon black. ' expensive handling equipment required C. Marginal - generally low value cargoes paperwork involved not as advancedas that could be placed in containers. This type containers, thereforedelays occur. cargo includes pig iron, steel ingots and unmanufactured wood . 8. Wef bulk all commodities which exist in a liquid or semi-liquidstate. Thiscargo is usuallypumped. Examples: sulphur, petro- chemicals,crude, gas, slurriedminerals coal, baux ite, iron ore! .

Loadingfacilities for wet bulk usuallyinclude a loading dock which supportsthe various valvesand required hose handling equipmenf. Tankersand fank bargesgenerally are equip- ped wifh adequatepumping equipment to dis- chargefheir cargo.

Advantagesof bulk handling: Reproducedby permissionof the Port of Brisfol, . minimum labor required England ' no packingor packagingrequired 3.1.2.2 Bulk Cargo ' one bill of loading A homogeneouscargo with no form oF pack- usually one port of call aging and not capable of being handled with ' ability fo haul largevolumes over long a sling . There are two general classificafions distance . For bulk cargo: A. Dry bulk all commodities which are not DisadvantagesoF bulk handling: in a liquid or gaseoussfate. Examples:ore, ' not all ports can service bulk vessels potash, phosphate,gypsum, limestone, ce- ' limitecf variety of cargo ment, coal, grain. .' require large storage facilifies ' many bulk cargoes difficult to dis- 'Loadingfacilities for dry bulk vary from con- charge ventional drag line to seasidegalleries equip- ' require extensiveclean up of equipment ped with elevators, storagebins and convey- for differenf fype cargoesusing same or systems. dischargingequipment . 3.1.2.3 Hreak Sulk Existing problemsfacing passengerservice: Generalcargo that is largelymanufactured declinein passengervolume due to airlines itemsor componentsof varioustypes anci passengervessel routes seldom change quantitiesthat are shipped together. A great ~ speed and cost. deal of food stuffsand raw materialsfat f into this category. Theseitems generally require storageor protectionoffered by transitsheds.

Advantagesof breakbulk cargo: ~ usuallytransported by landcarriers because of value truck ar rail! ~ shippedon regularschedule ~ can be economicallystored away from dockside .

Disadvantagesof break bulk cargo: ~ require large open storage space ~ subjectto theRand pilferage ~ require transit shedsfor sortingand tem- porary holding .

3.1.2.4 Passenger Portswhich are designatedFor the movementof peopleand their personaleffects to and froma vessel . Reproducedby permission of the Portof Bristol, England Characteristics of passengerports: . provisionoF facilities for passengers:toilets, lounges,baggage check, etc. ' related to established transocean routes ' usuallyconcentrated at densely-populated Passengerand Freight time schedulesfor the areas . Port of Dover, England

Dover ~ ~ Hovercraft Roll-oniroll-off ~e ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ Zeebrugge TownsendFerries.3.75hours. $sailings dally ~ ~ ~ ~ BelgianMarine.3.75hours.Osaeinee daily ~ ~ Ounkerque BritishRail Ferry.3.$0houra.e ceilings daily French Railways.3.50 hours . 2 saillnysdally C4ISII FrenchRailways .1.50hours .8 sailinSsdally BritishRaH F'erry.1.50hours,d ceilingsdally Towrreend Ferries.l.ac hours. 12 sailln0a dally Boll+PS BritishRoll Ferry.1.50 bours.12 ceilings dally SeaspeedSRH4 Hovercraft.&minutes,12fSShts daily 3.2 Location

3.2.1 Physical Factors

3.1.2.5 Specialized 3.2.1.1 Land Portswhich handle one material or product Parameters to be considered include: only. All their equipment is geared to maxi- ' established trade routes and their relation mize the handling of its particular cargo at to interior fransportafion networks the highestefficiency, Example: coal port, exist ing adjacent port installations fishery port. ' accessibility to hinterland and areasof producfion . Fisheryports are of basically two classifi- First and second day rail service cations: 4 . Commercial- port utilized as a place of dischargefor fish product. Theyrequire facilities for fil leting, packing, freezing and manufacturing fertilizer or fish meal . B. Small fishing boat operation catch sold day by day at the docks.

First and secondday truck delivery

Source: Port of New Orleans

3.2.1.2 Wafer A harbor is primarily a shelteredwater area af- fording a natural or artificial haven for ships. Harborsprovide calm water for maneuveringof and berthing shipsas well as providing anchor- ing space.

Harbors have three general classifications: A . Natural harbor an inlet or area of water protected from stormsand wave action by the natural configuration of the land itself. The entrance is so formed and located that it pro- vides safe navigation as well as protection. 10

B. Semi-natural harbor "an inlet or river D. Embayedvolcanoes where an island or shelteredon two sidesby head landsand re- coastal volcano has had its crater walls eroded quiringartificial protectionat the entrance and submergencehas taken place. The crater and the erodedgully can form a deep, well- only. C. Artificial harbor" protected from wave protectedharbor . action by meansof breakwatersor by dredging. E. Coral harbors coral reefs in the form of atolls and barrier reefs often act as immense Typesof naturaI harbors: brea kwaters . A . Ria harbors submerged estuaries in a rejuvenatedland surface provide very good lt is necessaryin the selection of a suitable shelterwith adequatedepths for vessels. harbor site to consider.. 8. Fiords great length in proportionto ~ amount of dredging that will be required breadth, steepsides, unimportanceof rivers ~ bottom conditions which drain into them, seawardthreshold, ~ shore area available for terminal develop- have great depths. ment C. Fohrden- estuariesin low country of ' size and shapeof harbor soft rocks,which havelost the riverswhich ' geographic,climatological andgeological once flowed into them. information .

Ria harborexample Fiord harbor example 11

3.2.2 Socio- economic

Location in areas with unexploited resources and an embryonicindustrial developmentre- quires an appraisalof basic positionof the port in reference to how it will bast serve tha hinterland. Factorsinfluencing thesedeci- sions include: ~ processingplants utilizing inexpensive water transportation for raw materials and finished products ~ fuel typesand accessibility ~ export and import potential,

In clevelopingcountries, ports ara developed for usually ona of the fo'Ilowingfour reasons: A . Establishmentof new national boundaries. Thisprocess may have eradicated or placeda port outsideof the new boundariesmaking it necessaryfo establisha new port if the country is to continua in trade and commerce, 8. Shiftsin nationalgrowth patterns may create the need for facilities nearer the hinter- land previouslyserviced by remotetrade centers. C . New or major industryrequiring a coastal outlet . D. If existing portsore unable to expandand have reached their economic limits, it is nec- essaryto establishnew adjacent facilities to efficiently handle the trade. 3.3 Administration 12

3.3.1 Owning Organizations

After close examination, it becomesapparent ~ the representationwhich they offer to those that no two portsare administeredthe same using the port in the courseof businessand way. No standardadministrative strucfure to organizationswhose interests are affected has been esfablished. However, most ports by its efficiency and svccess fall into the following classifications: ' their freedomfrom political considerations ' self~overning board,trust, authority, their impartialpolicy in relationto all forms commission! of transportwishing to usethe port. private industry~wned! ~ public /state 3.3.1.2 Private ~ munici pal Privatelyowned ports are thoseowned and ~ others railway-owned, customs~wned, managedfor the purposeof makinga profit, free ports!. in the samemanner as any other private enter- prise. They are normallyowned by companies 3.3.1.1 Self-Governing or private individuals operating understatutory A self~overningor trust port is onecontralled powersconferred on themby government.Within andoperated under the directionof the users, this category fall those partsof a port owned pri- the portauthorities and other interestedorgani- vately andrun for the particularpurpose of dealing zations . This includes local public authorities with the specialized cargoesof a companyor trad- and statedepartments, all of whomare re- Ing group presentedon a governingbody, usuallycalled a board. The board is almost invariably made Originally, manyporfs were run as private enter- up of appointedmembers, presided over by a prises,but the heavycost of capitalizingthem, chairman. Normally, thereis a svbsfantial, the rapidobsolescence of expensivefacilities manytimes a majority, representationof payers causedby the great advancein size of ships, and of rates and charges on vesselsand goods using the freezingof capital in anticipationof such fhe port. Thetrust ports are non-profitmaking developmentsmade fhem unsuitable subjects for with underfakingsordinarily financed by this type of undertaking.They gradually came publicsubscriptions bearing fixed ratesof in- under the control of one or the other of the more terest. However, becauseborrowing can be financially powerfultypes of organization. The madeonly with governmentalconsent, funds major characteristicsof privatelyowned ports available to trusf portsfor developmentare are their: normallylimited to fhe gainsrealized by success- relative freedom from restrictions ful management.The trust port authorities, freedomfrom political considerations independentand non-political, provide a unity impartialpolicy in relationto all farmsof of administrafion with a considerable fund of transporf . expert bvsinessexperience on which the port can depend. Thedesires of the memberswho 3,3,1 .3 Publi c/State are port usersare combinedwith the long ex- Publiclyand statemwned ports are bothgovern" perienceand know-howof fhe managementand ment~wned ports, althoughthere is a distinction executive officers. Summingvp, it may be between those that come directly under a govern- said that self~overning portsowe their growing mentdeparfment i.e. state-ownedport! andthose popularity in manyports of the world to; organizedvnder control of sometype of govern- their powerto shoulderthe heavy finan- mental agency . cial burden which the provision and main- tenanceof port and dock enfails With the state running the port, the national policy can be expectedto be evident. Theport maywell be 13

integrated with rail, road and waterway imparfial policy in relation to all forms serviceswhen they too are nationalized. of transport. Subsidies from state sources are nof un- known, parficularly where major develop- 3.3,1.5 Others ments are concerned ~ Fears of absentee Railway-ownershiphas been broughtabout direction, bureaucatic interference and in many cases by the practice often followed failure to apprecia te local conditions may by railway companiesof acquiring or build- be evident. It should be noted thaf state ing docks for the purposeof feeding their ownership in its present form is not ac- railway systemsor for use as terminals. Such companied by any reducfion in the number docksare regardedas independentprofit- of organizafions operating within the port. earning units. Theyare part of the service In facf, fhe state rarely seeks to do more offered by railway companiesto the trading than provide a port, leaving the users to or traveling communities. Railwaycompanies operate it. have been enabled by their good financial resourcesto spendlarge sumsin developing The major characteristics oF state-owned and improving docks. The major characteris- ports include: tics of railway"owned dock undertakingin- ~ ex c eI Ien t f ina nc ia I resources cludee: opporfunity for planning on a national good financial resources level ability to offset losseson docks, against impartial attitude to all methodsof profits earnedover the whole railway fransporf desirousof using the ports. sysf'em freedom from politica I considerations . 3.3.1 4 Municipal Municipal ports are usually administered by An ancient Formof port managemenfwhich a commiffeeof the local authorify. This still lingers in someparts of the world is thaf committeeis usually drawnenfirely from of control by customsadministrations of fhe members oF the town council who therefore country concerned. It is understandable that rely on re-election at municipal elections under primitive conditions the ruler oF a mari- fo continue their membershipon the com- time state shouldregard portsas meansthrough mittee. This systemcreates incentive for which much needed revenue could be channel- elected personsto take pride in a smooth ed, with the day by day runningof the port as operating port. However, there is litfle a secondaryobjective . guarantee that a newly elected committee- man will be well-informed on the problems The free port is a port area in which goods peculiar to the porf . Surplus revenuethat liable to import duties can be storedwithout shouldgo to port developmenfmay prove payrnenf of duty; this is paid when the goods too greaf a femptation fo city councilors with go ouf through the dock gate fo their destina- pet schemesfor municipal improvemenf. tion in the surroundingcountry. Theobvious advantage of fhis system is that foreign goods The major characteristics of municipal port can be dischargedfrom ships, put into ware- undertakings are: houses,processed and exporfedagain without - good financial resources having to pay duty to the national exchequer. ' ability to offset lossesagainst "invisible assets", such as employment for towns- peoplee 14

3.3.2 Operations

Theoperation of a port is a complexunder- taking. Dueto the overlappingof typesof portownership and administration, it hasbeen necessaryto establishsome sort of operational format. This has been successfully achieved in the formationof port authorities. Func- tions of port authorities vary but usually in- clude items such as: develo pmentplanning ' tra f fi c promotion ' ca pita l ra i sing independentterminal development leasing facilities operating transportationmodes ' operating harborequipment.

A majority of the port authorities of the &ited Statespossess the powerof right of eminent domo ln .

Thefollowing examples are the organizational charts of three selected ports.

Port of London, London, England

PortofNew York, New York City worldtrade

tunnels 8 bridges

Hoard of Executive Commissioners Director

termina I s rail transportation marine termina l s aviation 15

Mayor Deputy Port and Admini stra t ion generaI general affa irs Mayors Harbor Division affairs welfare Bureau departm 1st accounting 2nd accounting requisition

promotion~ promotion and research i research department management~management operations

port opera- marine tions de- wharfage partment 1st port service 2nd port service

Engineering planning 1st planning Division department 2nd planning engineering

engineering engineering works de- works partment inspection construction machinery el ectric

designde- ~ 1st designing partment L. 2nd designing

1stconstru- ~ 1st construction ction office i 2nd construction

2nd construc- 1st construction tion office 2nd construction

Rec I ama t ion construction designing Division department 1stconstruction 2nd construction

project department

Portof Osaka, Osaka, Japan 36

3.3,2.1 Cusfoms Ship related problemsor responsibilityof The primaryresponsibility of the U.S. Bureau cargo matters %II into the jurisdiction of of Cusfoms is fhe administration of the Traffic the CargoSuperintendents Department. Act of 1930, as amended. Their duties in- Usually one person either on staff of the clude: company or on contract assumesfhe duties ' assessment and collection of all duties, tax" out lined: es and fees on imported merchandise see that all booked or maniFestedcargo ' enforcement of customs and related laws is loaded or discharged administration of certain navigation laws ' note its condition on receipf and treaties. ' comply with the requirements of the master in the mafter of storage As an enforcement organization, it combats ' ensure fhot the stevedore's responsibilities smugglingand fraud and enforcesthe regula- are satisfactorily discharged. tions of numerousother federal agencies. The number of independently operated organi- Criteria for establishing a customsofFice is zations involved in executing porf and harbor basedlargely on volumeof businessin a port. functionsmay vary from suprisinglyfew fo Size of staff also is "dependent" upon many. The following list indicates several volume of business. Facility requirements typical types: are dictated by staff size, 4 . Carriers: ~ steamships 3.3.2.2 Physical barges The physical functions carried out in a port are ra i I roa ds divided into inboard and outboard functions mofor trucks with fhe transifion point being the ship's rail . airlines pi pennines. B. Storage Agencies: waterfront general storage agencies warehouses grain el evafors Free trade zones. C . Shipper and Shipper's Agents: shippers of freight receivers of freight customs brokers export agents . D . Freight Handlers: stevedores car and truck loaders and unloaders cooperage firms termina I cornpanies grain elevators ore, coal and other bulk handling, E . Vessel Agents: steamship agents steamshipbrokers. 17

F . Vessel Service Agents: G . Financial tnstitutions: towage firms banks vessel stores suppliers insurance firms, fuel suppliers H. industry: repair yards waterfront business firms dry dock firms free trade zones supplier of wafer and power. export subsidiaries of warehousing firms,

Diagram of cargo movement from vessel Source.' Port of Rotterdam

Temporary storage

Transit Customs Storage

Import IAIDO 4 3.4 Transportation 18

3.4.1 Land

The main function of the various transpor- This is the point about which all points on tation modesis the fast, efficient movement trailer «2 must rotate to misstrailer «1. of cargo. E. With the compasspoint on point X, swing 3,4,1, 'l Trucks trailer «2'snose around until pointA reaches Truck characteristics which relate to port Ai . Sketch trailer «2 into its positionas usageand planning include the weights, shown . sizesand turning radii . The following charts are an attempt to provide a reference guide F ~ Through the location of the kingpin p ex- for truck information, but detailed informa- tend a line back through point X. This line tion concerningeach state's vehicle laws then representsthe center line of the tractor must be used in the final planning of a parti- drive axle or bogie. From this drive axle cular port. center line, draw the tractor with the great- Ll est turning radius in its proper position with respect to trailer 2 in its second position.

G. With the compasspoint on the tractor front bumper oppositeside from the direction of the turn! scribe an arc equa'l to the turning radius of the tractor so that it intersects the center line of the tractor drive axle at point Y.

H, With the compassset at the turning radius of the tractor,place the point at Y and scribe CSrll&IIII ~ OI LlladlnyIIaLL loller aal~ an arc that representsthe curve through which Determining Maneuvering Equipment the bumper will travel .

A, Drawto scale trailers up againstthe load- I . Finally, measurethat distancefrom the dock ing dock at expectedminimum spacings. Use to that point on the curve just drawnwhich measurementsof longestand widest trailer ex- representsthe greatestdistance from the dock, pectedat dock with rear mostaxle or tandem Hasedon a Single Continuous Forward Move- position . ! ment, This Re resents the Absolute Minimum Distance Awa from the Dock Needed For Extend trailer «2 axle or tandem center line Maneuvering Area . in direction of turn. Minimum interference distances may be de- C . Drawchord AA1 from that point on the side creased by increasing the minimum spacing of trailer «2 where the axle or tandem center betweentrailers, by using trailers with the line intersects the side of the body, to the nose axle or tandem advance as far forward as cornerof theadjacent trailer «1!. Thisis a possible, by usingtractors with smallerturning chord of the curve through which point trailer radii and by usinga saw-toothedloading plat- «2 musttraverse to misstrailer «1. form design. Power steering can be of some help, for in a practical operationand for a D. Sisect chord AA1 and extend a perpendi- given turning radius, the less effort required cular line until it intersects the extension of to turn a tractor, the shorter the distance re- trailer «2 axle or tandemcenter line at point X. quired to maneuver the vehicle.

Reproducedby permissionof Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association erndfsundo« IN Horncbn enhkcc, ~ rrlcfar sold«O, buckbnckw. Ironer or snNNracershee asceed ~ lenclhof «l leal

Cceblnrtlanol Nabkcas Theac Nrof N«Nauan niN nol apply lo ~ ~ edf«berIf Nra beche-eernbrebsr c«rarkr«krn doesnof ascend NO leal in Icf««npbr

ffc becktr«nor «nl e«nlbeN«opsrafsdIn CrXllkkraSonChacaesaad ~ loselIonblh nf 55fa« orhanIbe a«heber lc «I lealIn lsfsl Iencfh

IN NoIruck and hoser re tna honorscr «syrnbar Induna«encfI%lac«a eperefcd Irr~ «adore ~ shSN aecaedNc NSCC Ia rna«b IarNINS «r«sdle «! toollerbdba lor sbnda rnhbdec

ta cc

Source: Texas Commercial Vehicle Size and Weight Limitations, 1 969 20

R I H I I aw Aal w ~ N Iwd ~ Iww alf Iaafw dah~ ~hdaaardlt. ~ WUtta. I Pf I h I UMWV. 11

7 W H Iru ~ Wdttt,4 Vdt u W, I W «d 4 hddard W WUPa AWa U~ U Ml I I I f u IWdl~ I, I,M UUV,W N .I !Jl VWWJI~f Lk9 talM. I I h V I Iad rdddl VW I 0 Wf.

74 U N 0 Ihl1. I L-NU,taa,udt-hat~ Wlra4h1 N da lart I adaa 4 4 Pd

f ~

I9 I ~ ll ~ N 7h JSN $3I

~I 8!it!RJAJEEKI UaaI Uhd V dd ardt lttl UaadU4 4 Udl aa It Wa IWI~~N I I I ~I I I UVWUV~WI N d rdl~uhsadNT. VWIHANA at VJAV AJJA LJWIV r I f a I t I I rd u td a'IGC4~ I lfr' TU I I JIKJKLIALJJNJL.aTl I I 4 d ad h I IWIU ~ I d da dua I r~~t I Ua d P IOUV4 4 I IUU Tl tla I ~ ad. ~ A4.I IWU~ WftadufUd I' a ~ w ~ ata da M thdWNN 0 I I wd 4 MU I ~ CI hltuas UCU ALLVVAhul0th 74rd 0 L W 0 W ~ Ud halho Reproducedby permission of Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association . STATE SIZE S LAJE!IZOITLIMITS JIJ!Y 1, 1ST%3 LCNDfNIING% Rl! AXLQtOSt Nll!NC! CMD%8WSICN1 IJNITI!IW! ~ LROKW!LA al~ IU CI d J BNCr« adaWON CI0 5 IATI Nltdd'I 1 IL ~Was I w I 1A~ 951 II N al I Star I Il Al« 0kt 4 4NC ll,sdtEu . lait 72,QN 'Tl,209 A!aasal 1 ~3. od PS 55 MP KP I,DNIEl Nt.VW I'Iill t LDII04d Swkt I 3-~ $4 ~0 44 wl To,hatDt ll, 044 lu,SOI 7 .2 Cod 7 .'Ias Aflahl I 2-~ 'la MR C5 6$ Itl, uat ls,ldo Il,V IV 1'I2NC 71Wd NS 5$ 6$ ~ S lt COI 12,049 ll Vat ,is,000 arihall 12-t tt $5 !l.dlu 12,000 'II, NVI t6 ldd CdLm lt N Rl tu Il 'll.Vlrt is,lou l5,VW I I,luo dt,Ildd 15.MEI Gdo4 I5-IAt 9l Idl diAl S Al ~ Al5 5J,lull hit,tuo 11.INN 11,dld I J-l I I~ A422 55 NP XP 22,JIVIMKl 14,140El lt,vuu C5,CDD 73,Wd 3,NNI EhdJ0sr LJ-I' ~ 'I MR Sl 15 10,064DS 51 74.0th 'Td.Md DlotdddCtlI ~ 12I ~ ~ KR MP 22,Ma Ju,ttdo sd.dlue, 46,~ lo 12,Xl I ~ kdld 13-~ ~ l NRf.l 51 $$ NP Io,dOue5 ~ rialIt, 1 I It.da5 10oiv 13.!dd 'll,Md Guitarl «14 5 ~ NR 5L $8 id,lid 5$.Wo Nl.Idl 1 NNI 'l3,JW N Wl 12-4 IM Ml W,ddoD7 11,tlat W.Nla ~1, Uut 1 ~,Aal VR 60 CL O'II7 'I'I,otu24 .Il,IIVII Il Nld 5~, Illa 13,089 SNR 11 I'I I' ttl !I',tltu ~ VOP5, 15 13,3eo W ll-l 9l 44 ll olultu :II, 400 IS,NNI CQD Ts,Iad Rt la Mo 'll I Ifa W Ml,OM Es Jl.luuEl ~ 5,WDXl SLQQCEI fl,altXI IJ,MO 53-S ac MRCt 5' 55 ld ~ 000S, Sl,lod 71, Ma «,Ma -6 9 IN~ ls.s a CSAl C5Al 14,Dld J2.VW W,Cdo Al 71.Ila al 73,144 14altdll -6Al INI 1541 ISAJ l,uohNf 22ld TJ IS,VMAl TLMO 'I3, 29V Ital~ llhl it-f ad INI 6C CS NP Ul,Qol D I 1,Vdl TT,NO 73,Wo W la' Iad ltrsAI MR Lf 55 NP 2!.INNR3 NINNIAl 5I,Ua ho,Nld 72,010 RR 75 55 NlAl as,Joe $1.IND SS.CM 71170 1 7 Natu!Md 1 5-6 MP 12,NIC Pl 3 ~,DIW 51.Iao Cl.UNI 1 2,494 73,liat M wwridor Ill' 13-4 %s Ml 55 M ll,dwlIXLICI 21.4091 I t5.NNI Sl.Dlo At IJ,CCCAJ 124,040 Al turdK 11-4 S4 KR Sd U 05Al 'll 40C CSlad 7 91, du 13,NNI Etwas 13-I ~ 4 Nt $5 I~ 8 'll,044 W,WD IJ.IWIAl 13.2NI Al Jtl ' IPO IJ.C Wl 5 S5 NP ld,DDD Ia Jl,ND Al ~ VQO5, 'I'IIhut 15,Ms IY-~ CS Idl ad W Al CSAl I I,ODI 51,IM 45,0NI 73,tdD E! ' I~ C'At CJAJ IN,ODIICa Ja,odd Gl ~ Iad5. 51,dtl 9 TS.449C3 fd,adoGl IJW NR M Cl CS as LA,MD13 32,suaEl IS,CINI21 I,DDDXs 71,I I4 %0,lal Al Idh k 136 ICkCl T4Gr «I,INI 21IVID I5.Wd pl,CDa 7l040 I4404 Nd ~ el8 70 7D 34add as,ede t4.I at 7't.Xla 7T1 T9T129 11,440Dl IJI ~ 4 NR 65 LS 05 Rt~ RR $1.IND 5:I ~ l,tls25 TI,NN 75,2 at NWJV 11-~ ~ I !IRCI EIY lf, ds ta,tadDd Xl M Wd dl.WD 77,494 00iso N Nrw la ~ NlR3 LNI ~ 5 ~ ' 2!,C40DQ LI,!la dlIVO TI,WO81 13, I NI York 13-0 ~ 6 NRCl 55 5' NP 12,dla M 34,Mt DJ,VDOKl 1D,908 EJ f3,240 NorthCarolt a IJ 0 NR 5$ NP Ih,aaIN El 16.MCEd ~ ddd3 EJ ILI AJ 1'l « ~ ~ 4 !S Id ~ 0 01At ld,Wv D3 32,444 tl WNIXJ 5O,IMO Td 15 ~ 5 492 L7,CDSDI 31,01"Gl Cl,404 11OW cah I&I ~ I Ml CS LN,sdtDl 21I48 ILMQ II, IBO T T Ilklhu S Nl 45 I!,I40M,r"I JILCNI Ct 19,00sAl CJslD Al 12.2IN 7tl.CW ll-6 95Bl 35Cs CdAl SSAi. Clu TSIRta $8,000Cs 40hat 23 ts.aeo 13,100 Il-0 ID 15 IS NP 12,IDC CC 34444 4f tse 73,IM 'I3, 180 WNNlvtcad I!-6 !IN soa 5$ $5 MP El,14D S3.INKI 71.Nl& IV-I ~ I Ia 55 NP 34,4NIAl 50,4041$ as,ccdKL 73.Mu ~ UNCwutt ~ Al5 ClAl II ldlIXI 12,4DO 0$,444 73.Qdd 15,1NI BalaDa I IJ-u 34 ldAt Ih.Wl 36,444 45.Dld 50.Iwd Tl.Cdd 73,INI TOWf' t>d Sd NNCa SD KP HP IS.Ddd w,409 TS,OW Ts,ICO T llu I! 6 INI NR Cl VS 4$ II.Dld Dt 32,INV 50,4at Tl,dad ra.pw Milk il Pl 40 ~ 4 DlCll WlCl I Id,INI . IS.CM 59.'m TS.SNL V I l-l 96 NE 55 $5 NP 12,INI 13 5d,owt IJ,Itl4 I 96 Ml LS NP 13ICD Di 33,040 tl, 0th 31,O44 14,tdd VlON ~ D C5 I!,NltIXI 17.400 IS,dad 5'.064 ss,add ld,Wl N SIVVU 12-d Pd ~ 0 N I' GI,OWEl 32.400KJ 45,000Xs SC,44O81 'la,990 15.tda A! T1'7 T d 'Iudl tl-I Al 9O NR NlAl I Al 'Il, 444 TS,tao -5 00 lSCJ S5 NP Hl.Jad 31.CW I II,404 73,184 12d ~ C IM 65 I'I Cl II', ldo 34.OOO Is,sus M,SCD 'll.854 Nl a '14' I Urlaw

VI I a'h a ~ rl I I SIQELL L I ~ l aa l Ur I IIa d d lt 21

3.4.1.2 Rail Anotherconcept utilized in the rail industry Rail movementof cargo representsa sizeable is the "unit train". Thisidea, not really volume. The types, sizesand numberof newto the industry,is growingin use. rail carsare many: Hasically, the concept is designedfor bulk general purpose box cars cargoes,such as coal, pelletized ore, potash, ' bulk head Flat cars phosphate,lead, corn, etc., which can be ' general and special purposeflat cars loadedaf one point then delivered uninter- ' specially equipped box cars rupted at the destinedport. ThIsowner of ' auto-veyor and saddleback flat cars the cargoleases the entiretrain for his cargo. ' gondola cars covered hopper cars Anofher concepf designedto competewith ' open-top hoppercars marine conveyanceis the "land bridge". ' refrigerafor cars ~ The land bridge is the utilization of land transportfor part of what would normally Eachrail line providestheir own sizesand be an acean voyage. Its infent is to move variations to each of the above as well as goodsby shortestdistance between two manycustom and special cars. Theonly poinfsat the fowesfelapsed fime and cost. ifem that remains constant is the wheel Containerizationis the key to bringing spacing to fit existing tracks. time and cost for land fransportto a com- petitive positionwith seatransport. Now" In 1968, the total U.S. fleet of freight cars ever, many experts in transportation believe wasapproximately 8'14,000, of which 70,000 it will be difficult for land bridgesto com- were added in fhat year, The trend has been pete with Ihe new faster confainer ships to larger cars. currently coming into service. The "piggy back" conceptrepresents 5/o of all car loading.

In 1968, there were approximately 1,337,000 railway car loadings, which carried 2,179',000 revenue producing units. This figure increases as more items are containerized.

Problemsgenerated by this increaseare pri- marily onesof congestion. Many shippers desire late afternooncoll ection and early morning delivery. To accommodate this, more trailer parking space is needed at the port . 22

Proposedroute of the "Land Bridge" Source: New Orleans, Centroport

doors Side t onl

Lowplatform High platform For all cars except refrigeratorcars

Buildingsand sheds Warehouseand Highplatforms serving Canopiesand awnings adjacent sidetracks enginehouse doors refrigeratorcars Source: Architectural Graphic Standards 23

NOTES TM5Co ARTFOR INFORJJIATIOh ONLY-NO LIAIKII ITY CAN SE ASSSISSEP ARCNTECTC,COHTRICTOIIS, E745«oujd C«ECA MTIasiciidaO 'HvdcvCD Giwzildi ~T j«owvIN lect AND INCNKl MEfol TIHIIEMTTIICH- Noel Lj«5 5tCcitr iacachstj rCI CJavl ~ aal NI~ C LC1Cv IT60 TIICI, Sir'CIL.VEISVNC'J~ CV TOPDF RAIL, ESCEPO CIHIOS ~ SASC OtRI L FOI OTHE~THIN PLATFORMS, 10IEDNTII.MEISIJRCC FloltCCNTC1 LiNEOF TRJCR. ARPLV0 Ncw COHSRHMCT!OH, SOMERECQHETaucrao» IHOlavE SRPEMZHN. SOMECr.r ~ E vARIED VPOL IafaovL. Ol IFPLICITION STSOISRNa«e MXM. AIESACCO OHVRAIVVN Caa'SISC FD1 ARIZQIJA. CII,IFORM!a. !OIHO.I NINE 90TA,NDhlfswl, INWIW. JeDITH OIHOTI, CICaoar IilDVas«INSTCN AREMPJIMHM EHCCPTCOL

LEJQALCLEARANC- R.LOUIREIJ:ENTS TI1401CI TERS Vf4TICAL .4 7011TJL 7 ' rcfi