SAMPLE CONDITION REPORTS from the Museum of Texas Tech University •General Condition Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SAMPLE CONDITION REPORTS from the Museum of Texas Tech University •General Condition Report SAMPLE CONDITION REPORTS From The Museum of Texas Tech University • General Condition Report - A report designed for a wide range of artifacts that uses a checklist plus remarks to record condition issues. • Condition Report for Fine Arts Objects - Specifically for fine arts. Uses a narrative style. • Originating/Ongoing Condition Report - Used to monitor the condition of an artifact while on loan for exhibit. Additional "Ongoing" pages can be added if the exhibit is travelling to multiple venues. From the Museum Forms Book • Arizona State Museum - A general-purpose form that uses a checklist format. • Georgia Museum of Art - Specifically for two-dimensional artwork. Uses a more structured narrative format. • Virginia Museum of Natural History - Specific to taxidermy mounts. Includes a very specialized checklist/grid. • Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory - Specific to boats! Also includes space to note treatments. • Idaho State Historical Museum - Includes treatment and storage recommendations and specialized handling instructions. • University of Iowa Medical Museum - Used to evaluate suitability of artifacts for loan or exhibit. From Museum Registration Method • MRM5 Museum - Specific to two-dimensional artwork. Uses a combination of checklist and narrative styles. CIOOC 211 Condition Reports: Reporting Damage and Loss Lubbock, TX - July 1. 2011 tt _ catalog / accession /loan \ location GENERAL CONOmON REPORT MUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY Artifact/Type: _ Purpose of Report: Photodocumentation (B&W /Color): . _ _ accession (dept. ) PROVENIENCE _ loan (from ) Continent & Country: _ _ inventory (dept. ) State/ Province: _ other _ Site: Feature: _ Level/Strat: Date/Time Period: _ Previous Assigned If: _ DIMENSIONS MATERIALS Height(cm): _ Warp & Weft: _ Length/pep.th(an): _ Pile: Width/ Diameter(cm): _ Additional Elements: _ INDrvIDUAL COMPONENTS - General (Ceramic, Stone, Etc.) 1. 5. _ 9. _ 2. ~. _ 10. _ 3. 7. _ 11. _ 4. 8. _ 12. _ Description: Rough Sketch: More information on reverse side General Condition: Stability: r ri ori! y: Recommendation: Excellent Stable _ 1 (low) Inhouse Good Unstable 2 Conscrv ator Fair 3 Monitor Poor _ 4 (high) Ot/H'r _ OVFJ\ )})}»})})}) [<erort By: catalog / accession / loan CONDmON REPORT for Fine Arts Objects MUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY Type of Object: . _ Purpose of Report: Title: _ ____accession (dept. ) Artist/ Maker: ----------------- _ loan (from ) Signature/ Date: _ YES NO Where? _ _ inventory (dept. ) Media/ Materials Used: ----.------- other --------- Support (type & materials used): _ ---------------- Framed: Backing: Hangers~ G lazin~ YES YES _ WIRE YES NO NO 0- RIN GS NO ------ Dimensions: DescriptioI! ~ Rough Sketch: r ~-- -------------------------------------- More information on reverse side General Condition: Stability: Priority: Recommendation: Excellent Stable 1 (low) Inhollse Cood Unst<1ble 2 Conserviltor F <1 ir J Monitor Poor 4 (high) Other _ l\l'IH)rl I~y: _ I )all'/ D<1lc Updated: . _ MUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY ORIGINATING CONDITION REPORT ill NUMBER: TTU 1959-241 OBJECT/TITLE: The Legend of Pecos Bill ARTIST/MAKER: Harold Van Schmidt MATERIAL: Oil on canvas, framed DATE: 1948 DIMENSIONS: 39" x 45" CONDITION: Canvas loose on stretcher. Minor crackling throughout. Concentric crackling radiating from top left corner. Stretcher mark around all edges, heaviest along bottom and lightest along top. Small black spots on left proper sleeve, on and around moon, and near cougar's head. Small spots of loss on stomach and near horses in right foreground. Very minor surface dust. FRAME: Minor chips, scratches, and wear throughout. Finish worn on all corners. Minor fraying to fabric. Minor dust. Some tarnish and smudges to brass plaque on reverse. Reported by: Matt Renick Date: 4 Dee 2003 MUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY ONGOING CONDITION REPORT ill NUMBER: TTU1959-241 OBJECT: Yon Schmidt Legend of Pecos Bill INSTITUTION:_M_us_e_u_m_X _ CONTACT PERSON:------------------- INCOMING CONDITION: SIGNED:------------ DATE: OUTGOING CONDmON: SIGNED: _ DATE: ~ . ARIZONA STATE MUSEUM i CONDITION REPORT Cat. Ii ---------- Object: _ Recorder: _ Datc: _ Matenals (Generdl): _ Damagc (If Known) Due tl}- Phvsical- Biol~- __ Fire/SmokelWatcr- _ __ AbradedlWom- _ __ PastlPresent Insect Damage or Infestation" __ Displayllntcrpretivc Programs- _ __ BrinlelDry- _ __ PastlPrcscnt Mold- __ HandlinglShipping- _ Broken _ __ Other _ __ Storage _ __ BumedJCharre:d- _ __ Pesticide Use _ __ Othcr _ __ Crackcd _ __ Cut/SplitITcar4' _ Smell E\;dencc of- __ FoldcdJCreascd- _ __ Chemical _ __ PrehistoriclEthnographic Deposits- _ _ Hole _ _Moldy _ __ PrehistoriclEtlmographic U~ _ __ Discolorcd_. ~ __ Other _ _ Darkcncd _ __ PrehistoriclEthnographic R.cpairs- _ __ Drawing on back __ MinorlMajor Restoration - _ _Dye Blecding _ __ Minor /Major Repair- _ _ Fadcd _ Stability• Other -------------- _Staincd _ Stablc Modem Usc _ __ Distortcd _ __ UDstablc _ __ Bcnt ~ __ UDccrtain, _ Parts are• _ Crushcd _ N Detached ----------- _Warpcd _ Gencral Condition- 0 __ Missing _ __ FraycdJShrcddcd--------- __ E!Ccllcnt (pcrfect) __ Mo..;ng _ __ Shcdding, _ __ Good (Minimal. minor ddects) Loose __ Weave BreakagelLoss- _ __ Fair (Many defects, but s.able) __ Selvage BreakagelLoss- _ __ Poor (Might nced stabilization) Q£QQsits __ Warp Breakage 1Loss- _ __ CorrosionlTamish- _ __ Weft BreakagelLoss- _ Action. Complctcd-Datc __ Crystalline _ Wrinklcd _ __ Frozcn _ __ Encrustations _ __ Surface Damagcd _ __ Vacuumcd _ __ Marks _ __ Bucklcd1Liftcd Areas- _ Action Recommcndation• _ChippcdlFlakcd- _ -Dusty-------- __ Nonc __ GrcasylWa.xy- _ __ Cracklcd/Crazed- _ __ Monitor _ __ SOilcd _ __ Powdercd _ __ Finger Marks _ SCratchcd _ __ To Conscnation, _ __ Other Dcposits _ _ Spallcd _ __ Other _ Comments: _ Check conditIOns if thc:y apply, use space: at end of condition to clarify "wherc" and "what." "If used, cross out tt:nn that docs not apply. 11f20/% REI! - -------~-~---------- l Georgia Museum of Art] 1.0. # REPORTED BY: DATE: ARTIST: TITLE: OVERALL CONDITION (check one): Excellent Good Fair Poor FRAME: Losses: Abrasions/Scratches: Soiled/Stained: Miters: Other: IMAGE: Abrasions/Rubs: Accretions: Cracking: Folds: Tears/Rips: Losses: ~pairs: Foxing: Scratches: Soiled/Stained: Surface Distortions (i.e. buckling): Other: 118 .J [Virginia Museum of Natural History] CONDITION REPORT - MOUNTED SPECIMENS Reported by: date: _ CATALOG NO. _ COMMON NAME _ PREPARATOR _ GENUSISPECIES _ PREP. NO. _ FAMILY _ NATIJRE OF SPECIMEN: _full mowlt head & shoulders __ cast other: _. _ NATIJRE OF BASE I SUPPORT: _ CONDmON of specimen _ Excellent Good Fair Poor Condition of base Excellent Good Fair Poor _ steady wobbles IDENTIFYING MARKSILABELS (list initials, numbers, sketch; note location on specimen) ___ tag ___ tatoo ___ other ___ none PREPARATION REPORTS: EVIDENCE OF PREVIOUS REPAIRS(rREATMENTS __ ~prior to mounting none ___ mounting/taxidenny records _ re-attached parts dale: _ other _ source: _ BIOLOGICAL DAMAGE CHEMICAL DAMAGE _ none none _ powdery deposits _ mold I mildew stains _ crystalline deposits insects _ active inactive _ faded (foxed) odorous type insects _ other _ PHYSICAL DAMAGE Broken I Cracked Loose Detached G~ Dirty I Dry Holes WaIJ:Z Worn Dis- Other Tom Dusty Damage spots colored Ears Antlerslhoms Eye openings Beaks I bills Nose region Mouth Wings Legs Fins Feet Tail Bcdy Feathers Hair Base I Support COMMENTS: LOCATION OF SPECIMEN 121 YM1'lH . Z41uly 1990 MUSEUM AND ART GALLERY OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY MARITIME VESSEL - EXHIBITION MAINTENANCE REPORT Accession Number: ------------ Name of Boat: -------------- General Condition: o good o fair o unstable o presence of dust/dirt o presence of mould o visible insect activity [past or present] (identify the location(s) on diagram) o sample of fTass/insect obtained o insect identified Additional problems: o major damage to wood _ o corrosion ofmetal _ o loose components _ o inadequate support system/cradle _ o other Treatment carried out: o Dry cleaning- [] brush/vacuuming o other o Wet cleaning - o 30 water:70 ethanol + Terrie N9 detergent o other -------------------- o Fumigation - LJMeBr C Freezing C Other Completed by: Date: 101 ARTIFACT CONDITION REPORT IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL MUSEUM Object Person reportin~2 _ Accession number Date of report~---------------- Inventory location Photographs: BIW Neg# Site COlor Slide # ------------------ Physical description of object(color; construction; materials; size--LxWxH inches/cm): _ Structure: glass Surface decoration/attachments ceramic ---------------- metal wood Structural damage textile -------------------- basket paper Areas of insecurity/weakness _ leather Surface: unfinished Areas of loss varnished painted patina veneer Previous repairs/restorations _ glazed unglazed oiled Previous aItera tions/addi tions/modific.a tio ns other Condition: Degree of damage (slight, moderate, major, extreme) _ __ dirt/grime worn abrasions Location of damage (draw sketch or diagram) stained corrosion tarnish __ warping __ Shrinking __ !laking -powdering holes tears scratches __ bulges cracked rotted __ insects/roden ts __ mold/mildew __ moisture damage __ embrittlement aa:retions delamination deformations other " 97 --------------------- ..--.q University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Medical Museum CONDITION REPORT Object Number: _ Report Date _ Object Name: _ Value ----- Borrower: -------------------------- Report completed by: _ Summary of Condition: o Unsuitable for exhibition or loan o Requires Conservation Treatment" o Minor treabnent/
Recommended publications
  • Art: Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery
    UCLA Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press Title Art: Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5xf6b5zd ISBN 978-1-938770-08-1 Author Scott, David A. Publication Date 2016-12-01 Data Availability The data associated with this publication are within the manuscript. Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California READ ONLY/NO DOWNLOADS Art: Art: Authenticity, Restoration, ForgeryRestoration, Authenticity, Art: Forgery Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery David A. Scott his book presents a detailed account of authenticity in the visual arts from the Palaeolithic to the postmodern. The restoration of works Tof art can alter the perception of authenticity, and may result in the creation of fakes and forgeries. These interactions set the stage for the subject of this book, which initially examines the conservation perspective, then continues with a detailed discussion of what “authenticity” means, and the philosophical background. Included are several case studies that discuss conceptual, aesthetic, and material authenticity of ancient and modern art in the context of restoration and forgery. • Scott Above: An artwork created by the author as a conceptual appropriation of the original Egyptian faience objects. Do these copies possess the same intangible authenticity as the originals? Photograph by David A. Scott On front cover: Cast of author’s hand with Roman mask. Photograph by David A. Scott MLKRJBKQ> AO@E>BLILDF@> 35 MLKRJBKQ> AO@E>BLILDF@> 35 CLQPBK IKPQFQRQB LC AO@E>BLILDV POBPP CLQPBK IKPQFQRQB LC AO@E>BLILDV POBPP CIoA Press READ ONLY/NO DOWNLOADS Art: Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery READ ONLY/NO DOWNLOADS READ ONLY/NO DOWNLOADS Art: Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensics and Microscopy in Authenticating Works of Art Peter Paul Biro
    Forensics and Microscopy in Authenticating Works of Art Peter Paul Biro 4 ISSUE 1 MARCH 2006 Fingerprints have been used around the world for identifying individuals since 1908. The availability of such evidence on works of art has been overlooked until the authentication of a Turner canvas in 1985. Since that case, a new methodology has been developed and the new discipline of forensic authentication was born. More recently, the concept of fingerprinting encompasses not only the marks left behind by our fingers but also the materials and working methods, widening the available ways to identify an artist. This innovative forensic approach has helped resolve equivocation and identify numerous important works of art as well as opening up a new field of research in art. bout 20 years ago, a client hang it as a demonstration. We gave walked into our Montreal in and a deal was struck. Some Aconservation laboratory with months later, a small area of the a large canvas he wanted cleaned and painting was tested to see how it restored. On first glance the painting behaved. After removing a small area seemed heavily overpainted and of overpainting on the sky we were recently so. The client shook his awestruck at the beauty of the head at the estimate for cleaning it, original surface coming to light. and said that it was not worth the Excitement grew and considerable cost as it was a wreck anyway. He effort was put into removing the asked whether our company would heavy coat of paint hiding the original buy the painting - to which he was surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Curatorial Care of Easel Paintings
    Appendix L: Curatorial Care of Easel Paintings Page A. Overview................................................................................................................................... L:1 What information will I find in this appendix?.............................................................................. L:1 Why is it important to practice preventive conservation with paintings?...................................... L:1 How do I learn about preventive conservation? .......................................................................... L:1 Where can I find the latest information on care of these types of materials? .............................. L:1 B. The Nature of Canvas and Panel Paintings............................................................................ L:2 What are the structural layers of a painting? .............................................................................. L:2 What are the differences between canvas and panel paintings?................................................. L:3 What are the parts of a painting's image layer?.......................................................................... L:4 C. Factors that Contribute to a Painting's Deterioration............................................................ L:5 What agents of deterioration affect paintings?............................................................................ L:5 How do paint films change over time?........................................................................................ L:5 Which agents
    [Show full text]
  • Fictive Strategies
    CONTENT 1 CONTENT 2 - 3 HOLLY ROBERTS - ABOUT 4 HOLLY ROBERTS - ARTIST STATEMENT 5 SUZANNE SBARGE - ABOUT 6 SUZANNE SBARGE - ARTIST STATEMENT 7 EXHIBITION STATEMENT 8 - 9 EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY 10 - 12 BEHIND THE SCENES 13 - 17 WORKS IN SHOW 18 THANK YOU PAGE 1 ABOUT THE ARTIST HOLLY ROBERTS Holly Roberts’ first national exposure c a m e i n 1 9 8 9 with the publication of the monograph, "Holly Roberts", from the Untitled Series published by the Friends of Photography. Although her work has always been based on the photograph, it was the inclusion of paint that made it so distinct. As David Featherstone says in his introduction, “Roberts is a painter, yet it is the photograph underlying the paint, even when it can scarcely be seen, that gives the work its intriguing, mysterious power. Drawing from the iconography of primitive art, particularly that of the Native American, Mexican and Hispanic cultures of the Southwest, where she lives, she creates paintings that address a broad range of human emotions. While it is Roberts’ evolving interaction with the photograph that takes her to her finished work, it is the existence of the underlying photographic image— even when it is obscured by paint— that gives the work its powerful qualities and sets up the emotional challenge for the viewer.” PAGE 2 ABOUT THE ARTIST HOLLY ROBERTS Her work has continued to evolve, but she has reversed her original process of heavily overpainting the black and white silver print. She now works on top of a painted surface, developing a narrative scene with collaged photographic elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8: Conservation Treatment
    Chapter 8: Conservation Treatment Page A. Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 8:1 What is preservation and how is it accomplished? ......................................................................... 8:2 What is conservation treatment? .................................................................................................... 8:2 What is stabilization? ...................................................................................................................... 8:3 What is restoration? ........................................................................................................................ 8:3 Why use reproductions? ................................................................................................................. 8:4 Why should treatments be reversible? ............................................................................................ 8:4 What NPS guidance is available to help me make decisions about conservation treatment? ....... 8:4 When do I need a conservator? ...................................................................................................... 8:4 B. Factors to Consider Before Conservation Treatment ................................................................ 8:5 How will I know what conservation treatment is appropriate? ........................................................ 8:5 What guidelines should I follow when considering
    [Show full text]
  • RES.7 the Presentation of Wall Paintings
    THE PRESENTATION OF WALL PAINTINGS Views, Concepts, and Approaches Ljubljana, 2020 Original title in Slovenian: Zavod za varstvo kulturne dediščine Slovenije Restavratorski center PREZENTACIJA STENSKIH POSLIKAV – pogledi, koncepti, pristopi Monografska objava prispevkov, nastalih leta 2018 iz referatov z dveh simpozijev: Retuša in problematika prezentiranja stenskih poslikav, Škofja Loka, 27. 10. 2016 in Estetska prezentacija stenskih slik – problemi in rešitve, Narodna galerija, Ljubljana, 3. 10. 2017. RES.7 publikacije ZVKDS Restavratorskega centra Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Slovenia Restoration Centre THE PRESENTATION OF WALL PAINTINGS – Views, Concepts, and Approaches Monograph of papers from 2018 based on talks given at the symposia: Retouching and the Issues of Wall Painting Presentation, Škofja Loka, 27 Oct 2016, and The Aesthetic Presentation of Wall Paintings – Problems and Solutions, National Gallery, Ljubljana, 3 Oct 2017. RES.7 The publications of the IPCHS Restoration Centre Issued and published by: Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Slovenia, on its behalf: Jernej Hudolin Prologue: Mateja Neža Sitar Authors: Janez Balažic, Marta Bensa, Ivan Bogovčič, Vlasta Čobal Sedmak, Alberto Felici, Andrej Jazbec, Anita Kavčič Klančar, Martina Lesar Kikelj, Simona Menoni Muršič, Ajda Mladenovič, Minka Osojnik, Robert Peskar, Ursula Schädler-Saub, Mateja Neža Sitar, Ivan Srša, Klavdij Zalar, Gorazd Živkovič Photo credits: see Image Sources Editor: Mateja Neža Sitar Members of the editorial board: Vlasta Čobal Sedmak, Anita Kavčič Klančar, Martina Lesar Kikelj, Simona Menoni Muršič, Ajda Mladenovič, Mateja Neža Sitar Content revision: Ajda Mladenovič, Mateja Neža Sitar Peer review: Matej Klemenčič, Neva Pološki Sources and bibliography: Mateja Neža Sitar, Tanja Dolinar Foreign authors submitted their papers in English and Slovenian authors in Slovene.
    [Show full text]
  • The Removal of Overpaintings in the Case of a Newly Found Painting by Master HGG
    Varstvo spomenikov 45 Simona Škorja The removal of overpaintings in the case of a newly found painting by Master HGG Keywords: parish church of St Martin’s, Laško, mature period of Master HGG, painting on canvas, conservation, restoration, ethics of removing overpaintings, scientific examination methods Abstract The article looks at the issue of overpaintings of works of art on canvas supports, with a focus on a newly discovered painting by Master Hans Georg von Geigerfeld from the parish church of St Martin’s in Laško, which had been overpainted in its entirety. The subject of the removal of overpaintings from works of arts is interesting from several points of view: the procedures involved in the actual removal, scientific testing procedures, the interpretation of research results and the professional and ethical dilemmas faced by restorers during this process. The article introduces the methods and procedures used in the removal of overpaintings and discusses the issues raised during the conservation- restoration work carried out on the painting in question. Introduction The oil painting on canvas showing the Holy Trinity (83.5 x 51.5 cm) is part of the Rosary altar from the parish church of St Martin’s in Laško.1 In 2006 the painting was brought to the easel painting department of the Restoration Centre at the Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Slovenia (RC ZVKDS) as part of the project to restore the altarpiece.2 Even an initial close inspection in visible light revealed that the painting had been overpainted with dense, thick applications of oil paint.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Raman and X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopies To
    AlessiaCoccato_kaft_v3.pdf 1 10/05/2017 10:03:51 The non-destructive examination of paintings, pigments, and their degradation of examination The non-destructive Application of Raman and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopies to Cultural Heritage materials Heritage Cultural to spectroscopies fluorescence and X-ray Raman of Application Application of Raman and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopies to Cultural Heritage materials The non-destructive examination of paintings, pigments, and their degradation C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Alessia Coccato Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Archaeology Alessia Coccato Alessia Supervisor Prof. dr. Peter Vandenabeele Department of Archaeology – Ghent University Co-supervisor Prof. dr. Danilo Bersani Department of Physics and Earth Sciences – University of Parma Dean Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Archaeology 2017 Thanks to my supervisor, Prof. dr. Peter Vandenabeele, for the opportunity and for the support through the years. I do appreciate (now) all the challenges you proposed me, and all the times you had to push me to do more. It hasn’t always been easy, or smooth, but I have made it this far. Thanks for having trusted me. Thanks to Prof. dr. Danilo Bersani, for having first planted the Raman-seed almost 10 years ago, when I first started studying conservation science. Thanks for the feedback, for the scientific cooperations and for the support. Thanks to Prof. dr. Luc Moens, for the kind curiosity on whatever new project I was working on.
    [Show full text]
  • Acrylic Paint and Montreal Hard-Edge Painting Jessica Veevers a Thesis in the De
    The Intersection of Materiality and Mattering: Acrylic Paint and Montreal Hard-Edge Painting Jessica Veevers A Thesis In the Department Of Art History Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Art History) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada January 2020 ©Jessica Veevers, 2020 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Jessica Veevers Entitled: The Intersection of Materiality and Mattering: Acrylic Paint and Montreal Hard-Edge Painting and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor Of Philosophy (Art History) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: Chair Dr. Haidee Wasson External Examiner Dr. Mark Cheetham External to Program Dr. Mark Sussman Examiner Dr. Steven Stowell Examiner Dr. Edith-Anne Pageot Thesis Supervisor Dr. Anne Whitelaw Approved by Dr. Kristina Huneault, Graduate Program Director January 10, 2020 Dr. Rebecca Taylor Duclos, Dean Faculty of Fine Arts iii ABSTRACT The Intersection of Materiality and Mattering: Acrylic Paint and Montreal’s Hard-Edge Painting Jessica Veevers, Ph.D. Concordia University, 2020 Set in Montreal with the advent of Hard-Edge painting and the invention of acrylic paint, this thesis takes a critical look at the relationship between materiality and mattering. The Hard-Edge painters, Guido Molinari, Claude Tousignant and Yves Gaucher undertook a new medium to express their new way of seeing and encountering the world and they did so in a way that was unique from other contemporaneous abstract painters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Roles of Curators and Conservators
    Disciplines in motion: The changing roles of curators and conservators Ron Spronk Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada Radboud University, Nijmegen. Slide 1 Dear Olga, thank you very much for your kind introduction, and thank you to the members of Programme Committee for the invitation to speak today. Ladies and gentlemen, dear colleagues, it is a great pleasure to share with you today some thoughts about the conference theme of CODART Vijftien. Slide 2 Conserving the arts: the task of the curator and the conservator? My first thought, and probably many of you had a similar initial response, was that the answer to this question is a rather obvious one. Perhaps if we simply remove the question mark the issue would be settled. Slide 3 According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the meaning of the verb “to conserve” is: “to keep from harm, decay, loss or waste, especially with a view to later use. To preserve with care.” Naturally, conserving the arts is the shared task of both the curator and the conservator. And, for that matter, it is also the task of anyone else who works in a museum. Slide 4 In the announcement of the conference, the Programme Committee laid out the issues in more detail. I quote: “The cross-over of responsibilities sometimes leads to conflict: who decides on the conditions in which works of art are exhibited? Who determines the restoration priorities? Who has the final say in approving loan requests? Yet despite the occasional frictions among curators and conservators, technical research plays an increasingly significant role in the art-historical interpretation of works of art and has become standard practice in studying museum collections.” A few days after I saw the announcement, the Committee approached me with the request to address this topic, quite to my surprise, since I am neither a conservator nor a curator.
    [Show full text]
  • Aic Paintings Specialty Group Postprints
    AIC PAINTINGS SPECIALTY GROUP POSTPRINTS Papers Presented at the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works Minneapolis, Minnesota June 8-13,2005 Compiled by Helen Mar Parkin Volume 18 2006 The American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works This publication entitled 2006 AIC Paintings Specialty Group Postprints is produced by the Paintings Specialty Group of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works (AIC). © 2006 The American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works Publication of this serial began in 1988. Except for Volume 3 (1990) all issues until Volume 16 are unnumbered. ISSN 1548-7814 The papers presented in publication have been edited for clarity and content but have not undergone a formal process of peer review. This publication is primarily intended for the members of the Paintings Specialty Group of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works. The Paintings Specialty Group is an approved division of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works, but does not necessarily represent AIC policies or opinions. Opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and not official statements of either the Paintings Specialty Group or the American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works. Responsibility for the materials/methods described herein rests solely with the contributors. Additional copies of this publication are available for purchase by contacting the Publications Manager at the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences - Permanence of Paper for Publication and Documents in Libraries and Archives, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Techniques for Cultural Heritage Research
    IAEA RADIATION TECHNOLOGY SERIES No. 2 IAEA RADIATION TECHNOLOGY SERIES No. 2 Scientifi c studies of art and archaeology are a necessary complement to cultural heritage conservation, preservation and investigation. Nuclear techniques, such as neutron activation analysis, X ray fl uorescence analysis and ion beam analysis, have a potential for non-destructive and reliable investigation of precious artefacts and materials, such as ceramics, stone, metal, and pigments from paintings. Such information can be helpful in repair of damaged objects, in identifi cation of fraudulent artefacts and in the appropriate categorization of historic artefacts. Nuclear Techniques for Cultural Heritage Research INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA ISBN 978–92–0–114510–9 ISSN 2220–7341 @ 11-20121_P1501_cover.indd 1 2011-09-26 10:46:06 IAEA RADIATION TECHNOLOGY SERIES PUBLICATIONS One of the main objectives of the IAEA Radioisotope Production and Radiation Technology programme is to enhance the expertise and capability of IAEA Member States in utilizing the methodologies for radiation processing, compositional analysis and industrial applications of radioisotope techniques in order to meet national needs as well as to assimilate new developments for improving industrial process efficiency and safety, development and characterization of value-added products, and treatment of pollutants/hazardous materials. Publications in the IAEA Radiation Technology Series provide information in the areas of: radiation processing and characterization of materials using ionizing radiation, and industrial applications of radiotracers, sealed sources and non-destructive testing. The publications have a broad readership and are aimed at meeting the needs of scientists, engineers, researchers, teachers and students, laboratory professionals, and instructors. International experts assist the IAEA Secretariat in drafting and reviewing these publications.
    [Show full text]