DOCSLIB.ORG

Newly Added Projects Name of Project Estimated Cost Proposed Start Date Estimated End Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Newly Added Projects Name of Project Estimated Cost Proposed Start Date Estimated End Date Menifee traffic circulation improvement projects at-a-glance Newly Added Projects Name of Project Estimated cost Proposed start date Estimated end date Newport Road Widening $4.4 million Completed Winter 2013 Newport Road Widening – West Menifee Moving, the cit y’s traffic Menifee Road “Missing Link” $4 million Completed Spring 2014 Location: Newport Road from Bradley to Haun Roads circulation improvement program, began in 2013 and is moving full speed ahead. Newport Road / Interstate 215 $48.4 million Under construction 2016 This project is similar to the Newport Road Widening Interchange Improvement project completed on the east side of Interstate 215. Improving The road will be widened from two to three lanes in Encanto Road Improvements $350,000 Fall 2015 Fall 2015 each direction to improve traffic flow on this main MENIFEE 2 projects completed Safe Routes to Schools east/west thoroughfare. The project will: MOVING Antelope Road / Romoland $600,000 Fall 2015 Fall 2015 MENIFEE’S • Add one lane, for a total of three lanes in each SNAPSHOT 1 project under construction Newport Road West Widening $5 million 2016 2017 direction 3 projects added to create a 10-project CIP Infrastructure and • Install and landscape a new median. $170 million investment in the community Holland Road Overpass $18 million 2016 2017 Traffic Circulation Cost: Estimated $5 million. Construction is expected to begin in late 2016 and be Scott Road / Interstate 215 $52 million 2017 2019 Interchange Improvement completed in 2017. How are projects prioritized? Projects are prioritized based on a combination of need, funding availability Bradley Road and Salt Creek $8 million 2018 2018 Encanto Road Improvements and readiness to begin. The need priority ranks projects according to impact Improvements between An updated guide to Location: Encanto Road south of McCall Boulevard to traffic circulation improvement. For funding, the city must budget for Rio Vista and Potomac Drives projects and work to secure additional outside funding sources to cover Menifee’s Capital This project includes road repairs to lanes, resurfacing McCall Blvd. / Interstate 215 $35 million 2020 TBD project costs. The readiness criteria depends on where a project is in the and restriping on Encanto Road in both directions. It Interchange Improvement Construction pending funding Improvement Program pre-construction phase, which can last nearly three years, and how well the is part of the city’s Pavement Management Program Estimated project dates are based on available funding. project relates to current and future projects (see the project timeline on (PMP), preventative maintenance to repair and the back panel). preserve the life expectancy of the city’s roadways. Timeline for major traffic circulation improvement projects Preliminary design 9 months Cost: Estimated $350,000. The project will be completed in fall 2015. Please be patient as the City of Menifee works to improve traffic circulation: Environmental review (EIR) 12 months Safe Routes to Schools Developing plans and specifications 12 months • Please avoid construction areas when possible Location: Antelope Road between Highway 74 and Project out to bid/choosing contractor and • Follow posted detours or alternate routes construction to completion 24 months Watson Road in Romoland • Plan ahead for traffic delays Total time from start to finish 4 years, 9 months This project will add additional sidewalk pathway • Drive slowly and safely through construction zones near the Romoland Elementary School, creating a • Get updates by signing up for city notifications on projects or safe walkway for pedestrians near the school, pave emergency notices at www.cityofmenifee/notifyme For construction information, visit the city’s website at a portion of the parking lane and resurface existing www.cityofmenifee.us or call (951) 672-6777. roadway. Menifee Moving construction information is available at www.cityofmenifee.us , under Construction Update. facebook.com/cityofmenifeeus Cost: Estimated $600,000. The project will be completed in fall 2015. twitter.com/cityofmenifee Completed Projects Under Construction Future Projects Newport Road Widening – completed in winter 2013 Holland Road Overpass Bradley Road and Salt Location: Newport Road between Antelope and Menifee Roads Location: Holland Road from Haun to Hanover Roads Creek Improvements Cost: $4.4 million Location: Salt Creek at Bradley Road This project will construct a four-lane bridge over This project widened Newport Road from two to Interstate 215 creating an additional east/west This drainage and flood control three lanes in each direction; installed a signal at connectivity route in Menifee. The new freeway related project will enable Salt Creek Via Corazon and added conduit for future signals; overpass will help reduce congestion on the city’s to act as a flood control facility and added a double left turn lane from westbound other east/west connections, Newport and therefore reduce the frequency of Newport Road to southbound Antelope Road; Scott Roads. Bradley Road closures at Salt Creek installed and landscaped a new median; and due to flooding. The project will: Cost: Estimated between $18 million and is prepared the road for the interchange project. • Construct a bridge across Before partially funded. The project is expected to begin in 2016 with completion in 2017. Salt Creek at Bradley Road to allow vehicles and pedestrians to safely pass during storms. Scott Road / Interstate 215 Cost: $8 million, funding is in development. The project is expected to begin and be completed in 2018. Interstate 215 / Newport Road Interchange rendering Interchange Improvement Location: Scott Road between Haun and Interstate 215 / Newport Road Interchange Antelope Roads Interstate 215 / McCall Boulevard Location: Newport Road between Haun and Antelope Roads Interchange Improvements This freeway interchange project will alleviate traffic Location: McCall Boulevard from Bradley Road New median After This project will reconstruct the interchange to provide easier freeway access and widen the congestion on Scott Road by providing more to Encanto Drive overpass to improve traffic flow on this busy thoroughfare. The project will: through-lanes over the freeway and improving Menifee Road “missing link” – completed in spring 2014 • Reconstruct the existing diamond interchange into a partial cloverleaf interchange design freeway access. The project will: This freeway interchange project will improve freeway access and provide more through-lanes Location: Menifee Road between Aldergate Drive and Simpson Road to ease traffic flow • Reconstruct the highway overcrossing and add over the freeway to help improve traffic circulation Cost: $4 million • Add dedicated right-hand turn lanes for northbound and southbound loop on-ramps to four lanes for a total of six through-lanes eliminate all left turns for freeway access • Build two new loop ramps north of Scott Road to improve entering and exiting on McCall Boulevard. The project will: This project paved the “missing link” on Menifee Road between Aldergate Drive and • Widen the existing bridge to accommodate six through-lanes of traffic, including outside the freeway • Reconstruct the highway overcrossing and add Simpson Road creating a main north/south thoroughfare in eastern Menifee. It included shoulders that will be used as bike lanes and a sidewalk on the north side. • Add five turning lanes for easier freeway access four lanes creating a total of six through-lanes paving, striping and landscaping this new section of Menifee Road. • Widen and realign freeway on- and off-ramps. • Widen and realign freeway on- and off-ramps Cost: The $48.4 million project is funded by the City of Menifee, Transportation Uniform • Add five turning lanes for easier freeway access Before After Mitigation Fees (TUMF), Eastern Municipal Water District, STP and Gas Company. The project Cost: Estimated between $52 million, partially funded. If completely funded, the project • Build two new loop ramps, eliminating all left began in spring 2015 and is expected to be completed in winter 2016. could begin in 2017. turns for freeway access. Cost: Estimated $35 million. The project could begin in 2020 pending complete funding..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 13: Glossary
    Draper Transit Corridor Project Chapter 13: Glossary % percent D °F degrees Fahrenheit μg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter dB decibel μips micro-inch per second dBA A-weighted decibel § section DERR Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation 4(f) Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 DOE Determination of Eligibility Dr. drive A E AA Alternatives Analysis AADT average annual daily traffic E. east ADA Americans with Disabilities Act EB eastbound Alt. alternative EDR Environmental Data Resources AM morning EIS Environmental Impact Statement ANSI American National Standards Institute EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency APE area of potential effects ERNS Emergency Response Notification System AST aboveground storage tank et seq. and subsequent sections ATMS Advanced Traffic Management Systems AWDT average weekday daily traffic F B FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FHWA Federal Highway Administration BART Bay Area Rapid Transit FINDS Facility Index System Blvd. boulevard FOE Finding of Effect BMP best management practice FRA Federal Railroad Administration BRT bus rapid transit FrontRunner UTA’s commuter-rail transit system BTU British thermal units FTA Federal Transit Administration C G ca. circa (approximately) GIS geographic information system CBD Salt Lake City central business district GOPB Utah Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget CEI cost-effectiveness index GPS global positioning system CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
    [Show full text]
  • FOR LEASE OR SALE Sale Price: $3,970,835 Multi - Unit Office Warehouse Lease Rate: $.65/SF NNN 5241 South Commerce Drive, Murray UT 84107
    FOR LEASE OR SALE Sale Price: $3,970,835 Multi - Unit Office Warehouse Lease Rate: $.65/SF NNN 5241 South Commerce Drive, Murray UT 84107 Seller will consider selling 5241- 5245 and 5247-5251 as separate properties 34,529 SF Total 8,719 SF Office 25,810 SF Warehouse Stew Knight 801.913.4990 KREA [email protected] Knight Real Estate Advisors knirea.com This statement, with the information it contains, is given with the understanding that all negotiations relating to the sale, purchase, or lease of the property described above shall be conducted through this office. The above information, while not guaranteed, has been secured from sources we believe to be reliable. Buyer or tenant to verify the square footage. 5251 5241 5247 5245 5241 (Unit A): 5245 (Unit B): 5247 (Unit C): 5251 (Unit D): • 10,175 sq. ft. total • 8,790 sq. ft. warehouse • 7,406 sq. ft. total • 8,158 sq. ft. total − 880 sq. ft. 2nd level office − 5,921 sq. ft. main warehouse − 560 sq. ft. 2nd level office − 4,079 sq. ft. 2nd level office − 880 sq. ft. main level office − 1,355 sq. ft. rear warehouse − 560 sq. ft. main level office − 350 sq. ft. office main level − 6,720 sq. ft. warehouse − 104 sq. ft. storage − 6,286 sq. ft. warehouse − 3,729 sq. ft. warehouse − 250 sq. ft. laundry − 1,410 sq. ft. office/bathrooms • (1) 12’ x 14’ GL door • (1) 12’ x 14’ GL door − 645 sq. ft. wash/groom area • (1) 10’ x 12’ GL door • Clear Height 12’– 14’ − 800 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DRAFT REPORT APPENDIX B Strategic Implementation Plan Final
    PHASE III – FINAL DRAFT REPORT APPENDIX B Strategic Implementation Plan Final Report Appendix B – I-15 IRP Phase III Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................................4 Purpose...............................................................................................................................................................4 TASK 1: SUMMARY OF PROJECT STUDY REPORTS IN THE I-15 CORRIDOR................................................7 Project Study Reports .........................................................................................................................................7 Other Project Related Analysis .........................................................................................................................10 TASK 2: GOODS MOVEMENT DATA SUMMARY .............................................................................................12 Riverside County...............................................................................................................................................12 San Diego County .............................................................................................................................................14 Conclusions and Recommendations for Implementation ..................................................................................15 TASK 3: TRANSIT PRIORITY TREATMENTS AND TRANSIT LANE INFRASTRUCTURE
    [Show full text]
  • Final I-15 IRP Phase III Report
    Transportation Housing Economy I-15 Interregional Partnership I-15 Phase III Final Report Interregional Partnership February 2010 I-15 IRP JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP The primary goal of the I-15 Interregional Partnership (IRP) Joint Policy Committee is to review and provide policy input on Phase III of the I-15 IRP Project. The two regions seek to collaborate on mutually beneficial housing, transportation, and economic planning to improve the quality of life for the region’s residents through the identification and implementation of short-, medium-, and long-range policy strategies. The committee will meet three times during the duration of Phase III at dates and times to be mutually determined. Staff contacts: Jane Clough-Riquelme, SANDAG (619) 699-1909; [email protected] Kevin Viera, WRCOG (951) 955-8305; [email protected] MEMBERS Scott Mann (alt.) Councilmember, City of Menifee San Diego Association of Governments WRCOG Executive Committee (SANDAG) Sam Abed Riverside County Transportation Commission Councilmember, City of Escondido (RCTC) SANDAG Borders Committee Rick Gibbs Councilmember, City of Murrieta Dave Allan RCTC Commissioner Councilmember, City of La Mesa SANDAG Borders Committee Ron Roberts Mayor Pro Tem, City of Temecula Crystal Crawford RCTC Commissioner Mayor, City of Del Mar Jeff Stone (alt.) Patricia McCoy (alt.) Supervisor, Riverside County Councilmember, City of Imperial Beach RCTC Commissioner Chair, SANDAG Borders Committee Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Western Riverside Council of Government (WRCOG) Jeff Comerchero Councilmember, City of Temecula Thomas Buckley Chair, RTA Board of Directors Councilmember, City of Lake Elsinore WRCOG Executive Committee Bob Buster Supervisor, Riverside County Chuck Washington First Vice Chair, RTA Board of Directors Councilmember, City of Temecula WRCOG Executive Committee AGENCY EXECUTIVES Scott Farman (alt.) Mayor, City of Wildomar SANDAG Gary L.
    [Show full text]
  • Henderson Interchange Feasibility Study February 2020
    Henderson Interchange Feasibility Study February 2020 Prepared for: City of Henderson, Nevada Nevada Department of Transportation Prepared by: James E. Mischler, PE, Lead Author Andrea Engelman Dev Sharma, PE Chad Anson, PE Vinay Virupaksha, EI Ancila Kaiparambil, PE, PTOE Naveen Veeramisti, PhD, PE Valerie Flock, PE John Karachepone, PE Jared Olson, PE Reviewed by: James Caviola, PE, PTOE Jeff Bingham 2/19/20 ii Acknowledgements City of Henderson Project Team NDOT Project Team Raymond Enerio, Hydraulics Tom Davy, Project Management Lynnette Russell, Project Management Rodney Schilling, Traffic Operations Scott Jarvis, Project Management David Bowers, Project Management Roshelle Olson, Materials Michael Kidd, Survey Luis Garay, Project Management Steve Buckley, Right-of-Way Mary Baer, Real Property Agent Chris Young, Environmental Tyler Thew, Stormwater Eric Hawkins, Traffic Jesse Smithson, Roadway Kathy Blaha, Public Affairs Laura Wiggins, Roadway Consultant Project Team Maylinn Rosales, Utilities Jessen Mortensen, Structures Jim Caviola, CA Group Heidi Dexheimer, Utilities David Chase, Structures James Mischler, CA Group Al Jankowiak, Utilities Casey Sylvester, Traffic Operations Jack Sjostrom, CA Group Christine Klimek, Environmental Charles Wolf, Drainage Jeff Bingham, CA Group Lance Olson, Construction Chris Wright, Traffic Andrea Engelman, CA Group Alyssa Rodriguez, Deputy Public Works Director Hoang Hong, Traffic Vinay Virupaksha, CA Group Anthony Ventimiglia, Utilities Eric MacGill, Traffic Dev Sharma, CA Group, JJ Muhlenbruck,
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Lake Valley Health Department Community Health Assessment
    Gary L. Edwards, MS Executive Director 2001 South State Street, S-2500 PO Box 144575 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4575 phone 385-468-4117 fax 385-468-4106 slcohealth.org Last Updated July 31, 2013 PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY SLCoHD - CHA Page 2 COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT STEERING COMMITTEE Brian Bennion MPA, LEHS Suzanne Millward, MPH/MHA (2013), CHES Deputy Director Graduate Student Administration Lead University of Utah Jim Thuet, MPA Daniel Bennion, MPH/MHA (2013) Management Analyst Graduate Student Intern Project Coordinator University of Utah Cynthia Morgan, PhD, RN Daniel Crouch, MPH Special Projects Graduate Student Intern University of Utah Darrin Sluga, MPH Community Development Director ACCREDITATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Tom Godfrey, BA, MA Past Chair Salt Lake County Board of Health Gary Edwards, MS Executive Director, Salt Lake County Health Department Dagmar Vitek, MD, MPH Beverly Hyatt Neville, PhD, MPH, RD Medical Director Bureau Manager, Health Promotion Royal Delegge, PhD, MPA, LEHS Michelle Hicks Director, Environmental Health Services Administrative Assistant Iliana MacDonald, BSN, MPA, RN Krista Bailey, BA Bureau Manager, WIC Administrative Assistant Teresa Gray, BS, LEHS Julie Parker, BSN, RN Bureau Manager, Water Quality Davis County Health Department, Invited, non-voting Toni Carpenter, MPH Utah County Health Department Invited, non-voting SLCoHD - CHA Page 3 PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY SLCoHD - CHA Page 4 Gary L. Edwards, MS Executive Director LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Interested Individuals and Agencies The Salt Lake County Health Department (SLCoHD) is pleased to announce the release of the 2013 Salt Lake County Community Health Assessment. Many dedicated individuals spent numerous hours collecting data, providing input, analyzing results, and compiling information in hopes it will be useful to all those interested in the health of Salt Lake County.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Removal and Replacement of the 4500 South Bridge Over I-215 in Salt Lake City
    UTAH DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: RAPID REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF THE 4500 SOUTH BRIDGE OVER I-215 IN SALT LAKE CITY Final Report June 2013 i FOREWORD The purpose of the Highways for LIFE (HfL) pilot program is to accelerate the use of innovations that improve highway safety and quality while reducing congestion caused by construction. LIFE is an acronym for Longer-lasting highway infrastructure using Innovations to accomplish the Fast construction of Efficient and safe highways and bridges. Specifically, HfL focuses on speeding up the widespread adoption of proven innovations in the highway community. “Innovations” is an inclusive term used by HfL to encompass technologies, materials, tools, equipment, procedures, specifications, methodologies, processes, and practices used to finance, design, or construct highways. HfL is based on the recognition that innovations are available that, if widely and rapidly implemented, would result in significant benefits to road users and highway agencies. Although innovations themselves are important, HfL is as much about changing the highway community’s culture from one that considers innovation something that only adds to the workload, delays projects, raises costs, or increases risk to one that sees it as an opportunity to provide better highway transportation service. HfL is also an effort to change the way highway community decisionmakers and participants perceive their jobs and the service they provide. The HfL pilot program, described in Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) Section 1502, includes funding for demonstration construction projects. By providing incentives for projects, HfL promotes improvements in safety, construction-related congestion, and quality that can be achieved through the use of performance goals and innovations.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Commercial
    Commercial and Retail Opportunities Centrally located in the Salt Lake Valley, Murray City is an ideal location for retail opportunities. Murray City is easily accessed at the central hub of Interstate 15 and Interstate 215 and boasts three Trax commuter light rail stations with a future platform to platform connection from Trax to the FrontRunner commuter train. The recently completed Nordstrom store is located at Fashion Place Mall. The mall has 1,057,100 square feet of gross leasable area. Fashion Place Mall and the surrounding areas offer a variety of shopping opportunities and fine dining establish- ments including The Cheesecake Factory, Macaroni Grill, Olive Garden, and others. The Pointe @ 53rd boasts 130,000 square feet of retail area and is a popular destination for shopping and dining. An extremely well-educated workforce, with a family median There’s MORE to Murray MORE to There’s income of $61,000 a year, supports and encourages a robust retail and professional office environment. National and regional retail providers have rooted successful ventures in Murray, including: •Applebee’s • Eddie Bauer •Red Cross of Utah •Barnes & Noble • Gap/Gap Kids •Red Robin •Borders • Gold’s Gym •Red Lobster •Burlington Coat Factory • IHOP •Rumbi Island Grill •California Pizza •Lowe’s Home •Sam’s Club •The Carhartt Store Improvement •Sears •The Cheesecake Factory •Macaroni Grill • Shopko •Chuck-a-Rama •Macy’s •Smith’s •Costco Wholesale •Men’s Warehouse •Toys R Us •Crate & Barrel (opening 2011) •Mimi’s Restaurant •Desert Star •Nordstrom Theatres •The Olive Garden •Dillard’s •RC Willey Retail opportunities exist at a number of prime locations within Murray, including: Ivy Place at 9th and Van Winkle.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Creek Land Development Mixed Use Development Opportunity
    CROSS CREEK LAND DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY OFFERING MEMORANDUM 100 S - 200 S 1350 E | LEHI, UTAH CROSS CREEK LAND DEVELOPMENT OFFERING MEMORANDUM the OPPORTUNITY Mixed Use Land Development Asset in Utah County With Immediate Access to the Thriving Silicon Slopes’ Boundless Economic Opportunities Marcus & Millichap is pleased to present the opportunity to acquire the Cross Creek Land Development located in Lehi, Utah. Lehi is located 30 miles south of Salt Lake City, along the Wasatch Front and was the 11th fastest growing city in the United States in 2015. The city has grown 28% since 2010 according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The development site is located between Interstate 15 and Highway 89 with freeway visibility. Traffic counts show that about 187,000 cars pass this location daily. Currently, the property is zoned C (Commercial) but can be changed to TOD (Transit Oriented Development) zoning on a case by case basis with Lehi city. (All zoning regulations must be verified by buyer). Because of the population growth in Lehi and the surrounding areas, many new employers and businesses continue to relocate to the area and have created a immense demand for commercial and multifamily development. With a prime location in the heart of Utah’s fastest growing region, direct access to Interstate 15, and the many major employers that surround the area, this land site presents a developer with an exceptional infill development opportunity in a premier location. THE The property is located in a Transit Oriented Development Zone located in Lehi, UT, allowing for a much larger and denser projects.
    [Show full text]
  • S a W P a SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California 92503 • (951) 354-4220
    S A W P A SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY • 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California 92503 (951) 354-4220 REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2020 – 9:30 A.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (David J. Slawson, Chair) 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS Members of the public may address the Commission on items within the jurisdiction of the Commission; however, no action may be taken on an item not appearing on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by Government Code §54954.2(b). 4. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by the Commission by one motion as listed below. A. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: JANUARY 21, 2020 .................................................... 5 Recommendation: Approve as posted. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. ASSESSING HOMELESSNESS IMPACT ON WATER QUALITY, RIPARIAN AND AQUATIC HABITAT IN UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED | TASK 1 REPORT (CM#2020.8) ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Presenter: Mark Norton Recommendation: Receive and file. B. PURCHASE OF AN EMERGENCY GENERATOR (CM#2020.9) .......................................... 103 Presenter: Carlos Quintero Recommendation: Authorize the transfer of $48,000 from Building Reserves to the General Fund and authorize the General Manager to issue a Purchase Order to YC Power Systems in the amount of $63,243.56 for the purchase of a Generac Model
    [Show full text]
  • Wyolink and Broadband in Highway Rights-Of-Way
    WyoLink and Broadband in Highway Rights-Of-Way Broadband Task Force Online Meeting June 8, 2020 Version 3F, as of June 5, 2020 WyoLink Re-Cap Current Situation ● Is a Land Mobile Radio (LMR) proprietary technology, is not Cell phone Long Term Evolution (LTE) - 4G or 5G technology ● Awarded in 2005 to vendor after competitive bid process ● System (core and towers) has been designed to/and allows for multiple radio vendors to operate on the system ● Currently 78 towers statewide ● Additional 15 towers under contract – construction ● 500 + users on the system daily ● 16,000 users on the system ● 12,077,923 calls in 2019; up 302,731 from 2018 (11,775,192) ● 98% statewide coverage ● $120 million invested into the system ● Designed to allow local agencies to migrate onto the system as their funding allows ● Built as inter agency (command & control) network; not as a Tactical network 2 WyoLink - Tower Locations 3 As of April 10, 2020 PCE=Portable Coverage Enhancement site WyoLink - Expansion Opportunities Current WyoLink ● Tower site sharing with Internet Service Providers ○ Have already shared tower locations with interested providers ○ Sites have to be analyzed individually ○ Concerns that get addressed: ■ Vertical separation (space available between txm & rcv dishes) ■ Size and weight of provider equipment ■ Wind analysis ■ Interference ■ Security (building and property) ● 16 New Towers ○ Under contract and under construction, utilizing Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funds: ■ General area of: Buffalo, Wright, Orin Junction, Evanston,
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Climatic Summary April 2017
    Utah Climatic Summary April 2017 Precipitation and Snowfall Reports for the Month of April Station Precipitation Normal % of Snowfall Normal % of Normal Normal Alpine 2.50 2.13 117 3.3 5.0 66 Alta 9.12 5.04 181 73.9 66.0 112 Altamont 0.28 0.73 38 0.8 2.2 36 Alton 1.24 0.94 132 3.0 5.7 53 Beaver Canyon 1.57 2.02 77 - 15.7 - Big Water 0.91 0.52 175 - - - Bountiful Bench 5.42 - - 9.5 - - Brigham City 2.64 1.76 150 0.0 1.1 0 Bryce Canyon 0.68 0.82 83 6.5 6.1 107 Bullfrog Basin 0.33 0.35 94 - - - Capitol Reef Nat’l Park 0.80 0.54 148 0.0 0.2 0 Castle Dale 0.08 0.52 15 0.0 0.4 0 Cedar Breaks N.M. 1.93 - - 6.0 - - Centerville 5.43 - - 4.0 - - City Creek 6.16 3.28 188 4.7 12.1 39 Clearfield 2.92 - - Trace - - Cottonwood Weir 5.58 3.17 176 - 6.4 - Cutler Dam 2.61 1.76 148 0.0 0.2 0 Deer Creek Dam 1.57 1.73 91 0.0 1.5 0 Duchesne 0.16 0.88 18 Trace 1.6 0 Echo Dam 2.46 1.38 178 5.0 5.8 86 Ephraim 0.85 1.21 70 Trace 0.5 0 Escalante 0.66 0.48 138 1.5 1.3 115 Fillmore 1.69 1.90 89 6.0 6.4 94 Fremont Indian S.P.
    [Show full text]