DOCSLIB.ORG

Wyolink and Broadband in Highway Rights-Of-Way

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wyolink and Broadband in Highway Rights-Of-Way WyoLink and Broadband in Highway Rights-Of-Way Broadband Task Force Online Meeting June 8, 2020 Version 3F, as of June 5, 2020 WyoLink Re-Cap Current Situation ● Is a Land Mobile Radio (LMR) proprietary technology, is not Cell phone Long Term Evolution (LTE) - 4G or 5G technology ● Awarded in 2005 to vendor after competitive bid process ● System (core and towers) has been designed to/and allows for multiple radio vendors to operate on the system ● Currently 78 towers statewide ● Additional 15 towers under contract – construction ● 500 + users on the system daily ● 16,000 users on the system ● 12,077,923 calls in 2019; up 302,731 from 2018 (11,775,192) ● 98% statewide coverage ● $120 million invested into the system ● Designed to allow local agencies to migrate onto the system as their funding allows ● Built as inter agency (command & control) network; not as a Tactical network 2 WyoLink - Tower Locations 3 As of April 10, 2020 PCE=Portable Coverage Enhancement site WyoLink - Expansion Opportunities Current WyoLink ● Tower site sharing with Internet Service Providers ○ Have already shared tower locations with interested providers ○ Sites have to be analyzed individually ○ Concerns that get addressed: ■ Vertical separation (space available between txm & rcv dishes) ■ Size and weight of provider equipment ■ Wind analysis ■ Interference ■ Security (building and property) ● 16 New Towers ○ Under contract and under construction, utilizing Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funds: ■ General area of: Buffalo, Wright, Orin Junction, Evanston, Jackson, Rock Springs 1, Rock Springs 2, Newcastle, Alcova, Bondurant, Northern Goshen County, Sundance, Greybull (Basin), Lusk, Ten Sleep, Northern Big Horn 4 WyoLink - Expansion Opportunities Moving Forward - Future WyoLink ● Requested 12 new towers from list of 17 expansion sites ○ Under consideration for utilizing Covid-19 funds if deemed as appropriate: ■ General area of: Saratoga, Northern Sheridan County, North Albany County, South Albany ■ County, Ranchester, Flaming Gorge, South East Sweetwater County, South Uinta County ■ South Jackson/Teton, I-90 East Buffalo/West Gillette, Ethete/Dinwoody (Fremont County) ■ Southern Carbon County, Southern Sublette, U-Cross (Johnson/Sheridan County), Southern ■ Goshen County (Yoder), Togwatee, North Fork West of Cody 5 WyoLink - Tower Locations Tower Locations and Approximate Fiber in Rights-Of-Way As of April 10, 2020 PCE = Portable Coverage Enhancement site 6 WyoLink - Expansion Opportunities Moving Forward - Future WyoLink ● Additional WyoLink Towers (Could Augment State and Local Broadband Capability) - ($12,000,000) Submitted May 28 (#16) This request would provide coverage to known areas with existing coverage gaps 12 new sites at $1,000,000 each. Note: anticipate 3 could be built by December 30, 2020, contracted for other 9 sites. ● Installation of Fiber Optics at WyoLink sites (map on next slide) - ($1,000,000) Submitted May 28 (#15) This request would harden connectivity for robust reliability and would promote collocation opportunities for Broadband providers. ● WyoLink Inter Subsystem Interface (ISSI) connection - ($150,000) Submitted June 1 (#18) This request would provide expanded interoperability allowing connection with other vendor systems and technologies (LMR Land Mobile Radio /LTE Long Term Evolution 4G/5G). ● WyoLink and WYDOT Microwave/Backhaul Upgrade - ($21,000,000) Submitted May 28 (#13) This request would upgrade the end of life microwave equipment WyoLink utilizes to a state of the art (Broadband Ethernet) network capable of carrying other WYDOT technologies (i.e., cameras, VSL, DMS, etc.). 7 WyoLink - Microwave vs Fiber Tower Locations - Potential for Fiber Connectivity As of April 10, 2020 PCE - Portable Coverage Enhancement site 8 WYDOT Broadband Procedures Policy and Agreements ● Dig Once ○ Working with service providers in sizing number of conduits and number of fiber strands. Reduces the need to have to revisit additional capacity in already crowded right-of-way (ROW) highway corridors for utilities. ● Utilities Department ○ Works and coordinates with internet service providers and district engineers on broadband in ROW projects ○ Refining policies and procedures ○ Shared Resource Agreement ○ M54 Utility Agreement (standard) 9 WYDOT Broadband Procedures NEPA Requirements ● If there is no federal nexus, NEPA does not apply. ● If there is a federal nexus, NEPA does apply: ○ Projects with a federal nexus (anticipated for CARES Act) ■ Federal nexus = federal funding or action on federal land ○ NEPA document required to provide a review and disclosure of environmental impacts ○ Most WYDOT actions with federal nexus are handled with a Categorical Exclusion (CE): ■ CE used for a project that does not have a significant effect on the human environment ■ Expected time frame: 3 to 6 months • 6 months if wetland, cultural, etc. clearances needed ■ Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement would take longer ● WYDOT utility permit (required to construct in highway right-of-way) ○ Approval time frame - 2 weeks ■ Final NEPA document (if applicable) required for permit approval 10 WYDOT Broadband Procedures Right-of-Way Acquisition and Eminent Domain ● General Right-of-Way Acquisition Information: ○ Engineering & Appraisal - 100 business days or 5 months ○ Easement or Deed (requires land survey) - 100 business days ○ Landowner negotiation estimate - 60 days ○ Unwilling landowner move to eminent domain (W.S. 1-26-501) ■ WYDOT could condemn for installation of fiber to WyoLink tower ■ Statute requires 90 days for landowner to consider offer ■ WYDOT process: • Initial Offer - 65 day letter • Final Offer - 15 day letter • File condemnation paperwork - 10 days • Landowner served - unknown • Court sets hearing date - unknown ○ With court delays caused by COVID-19, getting a court date will be late 2020 / early 2021 ○ Not feasible to acquire property prior to December 30, 2020 11 Utah Broadband Procedures UDOT General Principles (see attached documents) ● Public Private Partnerships ○ Utah changed its state law in the 1990s to allow companies to lease or barter in-kind for access within interstate rights-of-way under certain conditions. ○ Underserved communities are getting high speed connectivity by partnering with UDOT. ● Value of Interstate and Federal-Aid Rights-of-Way Enables Public/Private Partnerships ○ The property value of linear highway corridors is a major incentive enabling public/private partnerships. ○ Large value of using expansive linear corridors relatively free of obstructions and other utilities. ● States and Local Agencies Control Highway Rights-of-Way ○ A secondary benefit of highway rights-of-way is accommodation of public utilities. ● Interaction with Federal Land Agencies ○ In exchange for use of UDOT right-of-way, telecoms provide fiber and conduit - allowing UDOT to communicate with its variable message signs, CCTV cameras, weather sensors, traffic sensors, traffic signals, maintenance sheds and any other device or location that needs to be connected to the traffic network. 12 WyoLink & Broadband in Rights-Of-Way Question and Answer 13 Helpful Links to Utah Code and Rules on Telecommunication Facilities & Other Items 72-7-108. Longitudinal telecommunication access in the interstate highway system https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title72/Chapter7/72-7-S108.html?v=C72-7-S108_1800010118000101 Rule R907-64. Longitudinal and Wireless Access to Interstate System Rights-of-Way for Installation of Telecommunication Facilities. https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r907/r907-064.htm Rule R907-65. Compensation Schedule for Longitudinal Access to Interstate Highway Rights-of-Way for Installation of Telecommunications Facilities. https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r907/r907-065.htm Rule R930-7. Utility Accommodation. https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r930/r930-007.htm UDOT Fiber Map http://projects.horrocks.com/arcgis/udotfiber.html UDOT Top Ten Fiber Priorities https://uplan.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=43c32f052da8491ab565b1e42e45a1c1 UDOT UPlan http://uplan.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.html Fiber Optic Trade - Requires a login http://projects.horrocks.com/UDOTTradeTicket/Login.aspx UDOT Fiber Channels – Requires a login http://projects.horrocks.com/UDOTChannels/Login.aspx?redirect=http%3a%2f%2fprojects.horrocks.co m%2fUDOTChannels%2fOverview.aspx UDOT System Health – Requires a login http://511.commuterlink.utah.gov:9090/ FIBER AND CONDUIT LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN TELECOMMUNICATION PROVIDER AND THE UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION This Master Agreement “Master Agreement” is entered into this ____ day of _________ 2020 by and between the Utah Department of Transportation, hereinafter designated as “UDOT”, an agency of the State of Utah, whose principal office is located at 4501 S. 2700 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119, and TELCO NAME, Inc., hereinafter designated as “TELCO”, whose principal office is located at ADDRESS, CITY, STATE ZIP. UDOT and TELCO are hereafter sometimes collectively referred to as “parties” and either may be individually referred to as a “party”, all as governed by the context in which such words are used. RECITALS WHEREAS, UDOT is the owner of several rights of way which UDOT has acquired for the development and expansion of its highway system and the preservation of transportation corridors that could be useful to TELCO; WHEREAS, UDOT and TELCO own and operate separate fiber optic systems and conduit infrastructures in Utah; and, WHEREAS, UDOT and TELCO have both
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 13: Glossary
    Draper Transit Corridor Project Chapter 13: Glossary % percent D °F degrees Fahrenheit μg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter dB decibel μips micro-inch per second dBA A-weighted decibel § section DERR Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation 4(f) Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 DOE Determination of Eligibility Dr. drive A E AA Alternatives Analysis AADT average annual daily traffic E. east ADA Americans with Disabilities Act EB eastbound Alt. alternative EDR Environmental Data Resources AM morning EIS Environmental Impact Statement ANSI American National Standards Institute EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency APE area of potential effects ERNS Emergency Response Notification System AST aboveground storage tank et seq. and subsequent sections ATMS Advanced Traffic Management Systems AWDT average weekday daily traffic F B FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FHWA Federal Highway Administration BART Bay Area Rapid Transit FINDS Facility Index System Blvd. boulevard FOE Finding of Effect BMP best management practice FRA Federal Railroad Administration BRT bus rapid transit FrontRunner UTA’s commuter-rail transit system BTU British thermal units FTA Federal Transit Administration C G ca. circa (approximately) GIS geographic information system CBD Salt Lake City central business district GOPB Utah Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget CEI cost-effectiveness index GPS global positioning system CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Classification Update Report for the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area
    Functional Classification Update Report For the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area Functional Classification Update Report Introduction The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 required the use of functional highway classification to update and modify the Federal-aid highway systems by July 1, 1976. This legislative requirement is still effective today. Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. The functional classification system recognizes that streets cannot be treated as independent, but rather they are intertwined and should be considered as a whole. Each street has a specific purpose or function. This function can be characterized by the level of access to surrounding properties and the length of the trip on that specific roadway. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification system for urban areas is divided into urban principal arterials, minor arterial streets, collector streets, and local streets. Principal arterials include interstates, expressways, and principal arterials. Eligibility for Federal Highway Administration funding and to provide design standards and access criteria are two important reasons to classify roadway. The region is served by Interstate 15 (north/South) and Interstate 86 (east/west). While classified within the arterial class, they are designated federally and do not change locally. Interstates will be shown in the functional classification map, but they will not be specifically addressed in this report. Functional Classification Update The Idaho Transportation Department has the primary responsibility for developing and updating a statewide highway functional classification in rural and urban areas to determine the functional usage of the existing roads and streets.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR LEASE OR SALE Sale Price: $3,970,835 Multi - Unit Office Warehouse Lease Rate: $.65/SF NNN 5241 South Commerce Drive, Murray UT 84107
    FOR LEASE OR SALE Sale Price: $3,970,835 Multi - Unit Office Warehouse Lease Rate: $.65/SF NNN 5241 South Commerce Drive, Murray UT 84107 Seller will consider selling 5241- 5245 and 5247-5251 as separate properties 34,529 SF Total 8,719 SF Office 25,810 SF Warehouse Stew Knight 801.913.4990 KREA [email protected] Knight Real Estate Advisors knirea.com This statement, with the information it contains, is given with the understanding that all negotiations relating to the sale, purchase, or lease of the property described above shall be conducted through this office. The above information, while not guaranteed, has been secured from sources we believe to be reliable. Buyer or tenant to verify the square footage. 5251 5241 5247 5245 5241 (Unit A): 5245 (Unit B): 5247 (Unit C): 5251 (Unit D): • 10,175 sq. ft. total • 8,790 sq. ft. warehouse • 7,406 sq. ft. total • 8,158 sq. ft. total − 880 sq. ft. 2nd level office − 5,921 sq. ft. main warehouse − 560 sq. ft. 2nd level office − 4,079 sq. ft. 2nd level office − 880 sq. ft. main level office − 1,355 sq. ft. rear warehouse − 560 sq. ft. main level office − 350 sq. ft. office main level − 6,720 sq. ft. warehouse − 104 sq. ft. storage − 6,286 sq. ft. warehouse − 3,729 sq. ft. warehouse − 250 sq. ft. laundry − 1,410 sq. ft. office/bathrooms • (1) 12’ x 14’ GL door • (1) 12’ x 14’ GL door − 645 sq. ft. wash/groom area • (1) 10’ x 12’ GL door • Clear Height 12’– 14’ − 800 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Acre Gas, Food & Lodging Development Opportunity Interstate
    New 9+/-Acre Gas, Food & Lodging Development Opportunity Interstate 15 & Dale Evans Parkway Apple Valley, CA Freeway Location Traffic Counts in Excess of 66,000VPD 1 Acre Pads Available, For Sale, Ground Lease or Build-to-Suit Highlights Gateway to Apple Valley Freeway Exposure / Frontage to I-15 in excess of 66,000 VPD Off/On Ramp Location. Located in highly sought after freeway ramp location on I-15 in high desert corridor Interstate I-15 heavily Traveled with Over 2 Million Vehicles Per Month Located 20 Miles South of Barstow/Lenwood, 10 Miles North of Victorville Located in Area with High Demand for Gas, Food and Lodging Conveniently Located Midway Between Southern California and Las Vegas, Nevada Adam Farmer P. (951) 696-2727 Xpresswest Bullet Train from Victorville to Las Vegas plans to Cell. (951) 764-3744 build station across freeway. www.xpresswest.com [email protected] 26856 Adams Ave Suite 200 Murrieta, CA 92562 This information is compiled from data that we believe to be correct but, no liability is assumed by this company as to accuracy of such data Area / I-15 Gateway To Apple Valley Site consists of a 9 acre development at the North East Corner of Dale Evans Parkway and Interstate 15 located in Apple Valley. Site offers freeway frontage, on/off ramp position strategically to capture all traffic traveling on the I-15. Development will offer 9 pad sites available for gas, food, multi tenant and lodging. Interstate 15 runs North and South with traffic counts in excess of 66,000 ADT. Pads will be available for sale, ground lease or build-to-suit.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DRAFT REPORT APPENDIX B Strategic Implementation Plan Final
    PHASE III – FINAL DRAFT REPORT APPENDIX B Strategic Implementation Plan Final Report Appendix B – I-15 IRP Phase III Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................................4 Purpose...............................................................................................................................................................4 TASK 1: SUMMARY OF PROJECT STUDY REPORTS IN THE I-15 CORRIDOR................................................7 Project Study Reports .........................................................................................................................................7 Other Project Related Analysis .........................................................................................................................10 TASK 2: GOODS MOVEMENT DATA SUMMARY .............................................................................................12 Riverside County...............................................................................................................................................12 San Diego County .............................................................................................................................................14 Conclusions and Recommendations for Implementation ..................................................................................15 TASK 3: TRANSIT PRIORITY TREATMENTS AND TRANSIT LANE INFRASTRUCTURE
    [Show full text]
  • Final I-15 IRP Phase III Report
    Transportation Housing Economy I-15 Interregional Partnership I-15 Phase III Final Report Interregional Partnership February 2010 I-15 IRP JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP The primary goal of the I-15 Interregional Partnership (IRP) Joint Policy Committee is to review and provide policy input on Phase III of the I-15 IRP Project. The two regions seek to collaborate on mutually beneficial housing, transportation, and economic planning to improve the quality of life for the region’s residents through the identification and implementation of short-, medium-, and long-range policy strategies. The committee will meet three times during the duration of Phase III at dates and times to be mutually determined. Staff contacts: Jane Clough-Riquelme, SANDAG (619) 699-1909; [email protected] Kevin Viera, WRCOG (951) 955-8305; [email protected] MEMBERS Scott Mann (alt.) Councilmember, City of Menifee San Diego Association of Governments WRCOG Executive Committee (SANDAG) Sam Abed Riverside County Transportation Commission Councilmember, City of Escondido (RCTC) SANDAG Borders Committee Rick Gibbs Councilmember, City of Murrieta Dave Allan RCTC Commissioner Councilmember, City of La Mesa SANDAG Borders Committee Ron Roberts Mayor Pro Tem, City of Temecula Crystal Crawford RCTC Commissioner Mayor, City of Del Mar Jeff Stone (alt.) Patricia McCoy (alt.) Supervisor, Riverside County Councilmember, City of Imperial Beach RCTC Commissioner Chair, SANDAG Borders Committee Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Western Riverside Council of Government (WRCOG) Jeff Comerchero Councilmember, City of Temecula Thomas Buckley Chair, RTA Board of Directors Councilmember, City of Lake Elsinore WRCOG Executive Committee Bob Buster Supervisor, Riverside County Chuck Washington First Vice Chair, RTA Board of Directors Councilmember, City of Temecula WRCOG Executive Committee AGENCY EXECUTIVES Scott Farman (alt.) Mayor, City of Wildomar SANDAG Gary L.
    [Show full text]
  • I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017
    CALIFORNIA NEVADA ARIZONA UTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2017 MARCH 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) is a commerce, port authorities, departments of aviation, freight product of the hard work and commitment of each of the and passenger rail authorities, freight transportation services, I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and providers of public transportation services, environmental their dedicated staff. and natural resource agencies, and others. Individuals within the four states and beyond are investing Their efforts are a testament of outstanding partnership and their time and resources to keep this economic artery a true spirit of collaboration, without which this Master Plan of the West flowing. The Alliance partners come from could not have succeeded. state and local transportation agencies, local and interstate I-15 MOBILITY ALLIANCE PARTNERS American Magline Group City of Orem Authority Amtrak City of Provo Millard County Arizona Commerce Authority City of Rancho Cucamonga Mohave County Arizona Department of Transportation City of South Salt Lake Mountainland Association of Arizona Game and Fish Department City of St. George Governments Bear River Association of Governments Clark County Department of Aviation National Park Service - Lake Mead National Recreation Area BNSF Railway Clark County Public Works Nellis Air Force Base Box Elder County Community Planners Advisory Nevada Army National Guard Brookings Mountain West Committee on Transportation County
    [Show full text]
  • Mid City's I-15 Stretch to Open After Torturous 40-Year Saga San Diego Union-Tribune - Sunday, January 9, 2000 Author: Jeanne F
    A neighborhood's rough road: Mid city's I-15 stretch to open after torturous 40-year saga San Diego Union-Tribune - Sunday, January 9, 2000 Author: Jeanne F. Brooks They called it "Nightmare on 40th Street" -- a 2.2-mile example of urban life gone very wrong. By day, it was a corridor of weeds and broken bottles, abandoned houses, graffiti, exhaust fumes and rumbling, horn-blowing, radio-blasting, tire-squealing traffic. Endless traffic. At night, when the creatures of the dark came out -- prostitutes, drug dealers, gangbangers -- things got worse. From behind their locked doors, honest residents of the San Diego neighborhood of City Heights could hear gunfire in the no man's land along 40th Street. From time to time, they saw empty houses go up in flames. And nearly every night, they listened to the clatter of police helicopters, which some took to calling the City Heights Air Force. In the mornings, residents picked used condoms and needles out of their lawns, and they cursed the name of the entity they saw as their afflicter -- Caltrans. The problem was a freeway the California Department of Transportation wasn't building through the middle of the neighborhood. By the late 1980s, the long relationship between the state agency and the community of City Heights had grown deeply dysfunctional. Few then would have predicted the coming of a day such as this Friday, when Caltrans employees and community activists likely will shake hands and congratulate one another -- on the same side, in the end. Their common bond: the grand opening of the final segment of Interstate 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Henderson Interchange Feasibility Study February 2020
    Henderson Interchange Feasibility Study February 2020 Prepared for: City of Henderson, Nevada Nevada Department of Transportation Prepared by: James E. Mischler, PE, Lead Author Andrea Engelman Dev Sharma, PE Chad Anson, PE Vinay Virupaksha, EI Ancila Kaiparambil, PE, PTOE Naveen Veeramisti, PhD, PE Valerie Flock, PE John Karachepone, PE Jared Olson, PE Reviewed by: James Caviola, PE, PTOE Jeff Bingham 2/19/20 ii Acknowledgements City of Henderson Project Team NDOT Project Team Raymond Enerio, Hydraulics Tom Davy, Project Management Lynnette Russell, Project Management Rodney Schilling, Traffic Operations Scott Jarvis, Project Management David Bowers, Project Management Roshelle Olson, Materials Michael Kidd, Survey Luis Garay, Project Management Steve Buckley, Right-of-Way Mary Baer, Real Property Agent Chris Young, Environmental Tyler Thew, Stormwater Eric Hawkins, Traffic Jesse Smithson, Roadway Kathy Blaha, Public Affairs Laura Wiggins, Roadway Consultant Project Team Maylinn Rosales, Utilities Jessen Mortensen, Structures Jim Caviola, CA Group Heidi Dexheimer, Utilities David Chase, Structures James Mischler, CA Group Al Jankowiak, Utilities Casey Sylvester, Traffic Operations Jack Sjostrom, CA Group Christine Klimek, Environmental Charles Wolf, Drainage Jeff Bingham, CA Group Lance Olson, Construction Chris Wright, Traffic Andrea Engelman, CA Group Alyssa Rodriguez, Deputy Public Works Director Hoang Hong, Traffic Vinay Virupaksha, CA Group Anthony Ventimiglia, Utilities Eric MacGill, Traffic Dev Sharma, CA Group, JJ Muhlenbruck,
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Added Projects Name of Project Estimated Cost Proposed Start Date Estimated End Date
    Menifee traffic circulation improvement projects at-a-glance Newly Added Projects Name of Project Estimated cost Proposed start date Estimated end date Newport Road Widening $4.4 million Completed Winter 2013 Newport Road Widening – West Menifee Moving, the cit y’s traffic Menifee Road “Missing Link” $4 million Completed Spring 2014 Location: Newport Road from Bradley to Haun Roads circulation improvement program, began in 2013 and is moving full speed ahead. Newport Road / Interstate 215 $48.4 million Under construction 2016 This project is similar to the Newport Road Widening Interchange Improvement project completed on the east side of Interstate 215. Improving The road will be widened from two to three lanes in Encanto Road Improvements $350,000 Fall 2015 Fall 2015 each direction to improve traffic flow on this main MENIFEE 2 projects completed Safe Routes to Schools east/west thoroughfare. The project will: MOVING Antelope Road / Romoland $600,000 Fall 2015 Fall 2015 MENIFEE’S • Add one lane, for a total of three lanes in each SNAPSHOT 1 project under construction Newport Road West Widening $5 million 2016 2017 direction 3 projects added to create a 10-project CIP Infrastructure and • Install and landscape a new median. $170 million investment in the community Holland Road Overpass $18 million 2016 2017 Traffic Circulation Cost: Estimated $5 million. Construction is expected to begin in late 2016 and be Scott Road / Interstate 215 $52 million 2017 2019 Interchange Improvement completed in 2017. How are projects prioritized? Projects are prioritized based on a combination of need, funding availability Bradley Road and Salt Creek $8 million 2018 2018 Encanto Road Improvements and readiness to begin.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 15 Lane Restrictions and Detour for Wide Loads BRIDGE REPAIR PROJECT - VIRGIN RIVER GORGE
    Interstate 15 Lane Restrictions and Detour for Wide Loads BRIDGE REPAIR PROJECT - VIRGIN RIVER GORGE PANACA CEDAR ITY CRYSTAL PRINGS UTAH NEVADA ST. ORGE BEAVER M ARIZONA LEGEND Pr ea Detour MAP NOT TO SCALE LAS EGAS 19-077 Due to the terrain within the Virgin River Gorge and the narrow TRAVEL ALERT width of I-15, crews must reduce the width of the travel lanes during Restrictions on wide loads and lane closures construction to 10 feet, which prohibits the passage of vehicles wider than 10 feet through the construction zone. Crews will also move are scheduled on Interstate 15 in northwestern traffic over to one side of the highway while working on the other, Arizona. Motorists traveling on Interstate 15 providing one lane in each direction. These restrictions will begin this between Mesquite, Nevada, and St. George, Utah, April and are scheduled to remain in place through spring 2020. should plan ahead for delays in both directions This $6.4 million project will rehabilitate three bridge decks on through the Virgin River Gorge. Vehicles wider I-15 and is scheduled for completion in summer 2020. For more than 10 feet should prepare for an extended 224- information, please visit the project website at azdot.gov/I-15Bridges. mile detour. Drivers should proceed through the work zone with caution, slow down and watch for construction personnel and equipment. Schedules are subject to change based on weather and other CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS unforeseen factors. The Arizona Department of Transportation advises drivers to allow extra travel time and plan for the following continuous, around- CONTACT the-clock restrictions beginning in early April 2019 and continuing through spring 2020 as crews complete bridge work on I-15 through For more information, please call the ADOT Bilingual Project the Virgin River Gorge: Information Line at 855.712.8530 or go to azdot.gov/contact and select Projects from the drop-down menu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interstate Highway System Turns 60
    The Interstate Highway System turns 60: Challenges to Its Ability to Continue to Save Lives, Time and Money JUNE 27, 2016 202-466-6706 tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP ® of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit organization that researches, evaluates and distributes economic and technical data on surface transportation issues. TRIP is sponsored by insurance companies, equipment manufacturers, distributors and suppliers; businesses involved in highway and transit engineering and construction; labor unions; and organizations concerned with efficient and safe surface transportation. Executive Summary Sixty years ago the nation embarked on its greatest public works project, the construction of the Interstate Highway System. President Dwight D. Eisenhower provided strong support for the building of an Interstate Highway System that would improve traffic safety, reduce travel times and improve the nation’s economic productivity. Serving as the most critical transportation link in the nation’s economy, the Interstate Highway System has significantly improved the lives of U.S. residents and visitors. Throughout the nation, the Interstate system allows for high levels of mobility by greatly reducing travel times and providing a significantly higher level of traffic safety than other routes. But 60 years after President Eisenhower articulated a vision for the nation’s transportation system, the U. S. again faces a challenge in modernizing its aging and increasingly congested Interstate highway system. If Americans are to continue to enjoy their current level of personal and commercial mobility on Interstate highways and bridges, the nation will need to make a commitment to identifying a long-term funding source to support a well-maintained Interstate Highway System able to meet the nation’s need for additional mobility.
    [Show full text]