DOCSLIB.ORG

Paramoebiasis of Sea-Farmed Salmonids in Tasmania - a Study of Its Aetiology, Pathogenicity, and Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Paramoebiasis of sea-farmed salmonids in Tasmania - a study of its aetiology, pathogenicity, and control. By Teresa S. Howard B.Sc. (Latrobe University, Victoria) Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of Tasmania, Hobart. June 2001 This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the university or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis. Teresa Howard University of Tasmania HOBART June 2001 This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act, 1968. Table of Contents I Acknowledgements 1 Abstract 3 Abbreviations 5 Chapter 1. Background and review of literature 1.1 Sea-farming of salmonids 1.1.1 The Salmonidae ......................................................................................... 6 1.1.2 Introduction of salmonids to Aqstralia ...................................................... ? 1.1.3 History of sea-water salmon farming ......................................................... 9 1.1.4 Salmonid farming in Australia ................................................................... 10 1.1.5 Economics of the Tasmanian salmonid industry ....................................... 13 1.1.6 Sea-farming methods ................................................................................. 16 1.2 Major diseases of sea-farmed salmonids .................................... 19 1.2.1 Bacterial diseases ................. ..... .. ......................................... ...................... 20 1.2.2 Viral diseases ............................................................................................. 26 1.2.3 Diseases caused by protozoans .................................................................. 30 1.2.4 Other diseases ............... ........... .. .... ............................................................ 36 1.2.5 Diseases common in Tasmania ..................... ... ... ........... .... ... ....... .. ............ 38 1.3 Paramoebiasis of aquatic animals 1.3.1 The amoebae ................ .. ............................................................ ... ... .......... 39 1.3.2 Paramoeba species .... .. ..................................................................... ........ .41 1.3.3 Diseases of aquatic animals caused by amoebae .... ................................... 51 1.3.4 Paramoebiasis of crabs .............. ......... .. ................ ... ............. ... .. ................ 58 1.3.5 Paramoebiasis of sea urchins ............. .. .. .................................................... 63 1.3.6 Paramoebiasis of salmonids and turbot .. ....................................... ... ... .... .. 67 1.4 Objectives for this study .................................................................. 80 Chapter 2. Methods 2.1 Culture of marine amoebae ............................................................ 84 2.1.1 Seeding agar plates .................................................................................... 85 2.1.2 Subculture .................................................................................................. 85 2.1.3 Large-scale production ............................................................................... 86 2.1.4 Contamination control ............................................................................... 87 2.1.5 Revival of failing cultures ......................................................................... 88 2.2 Isolation of amoebae from fish gills 2.2.1 Ammonium chloride wash ......................................................................... 88 2.2.2 Cloning of amoebae ................................................................................... 89 2.3 Identification of Paramoeba species 2.3.1 Phase contrast microscopy ......................................................................... 90 2.3.2 DAPI-staining ............................................................................................ 91 2.3.2 Gomori's trichrome stain ........................................................................... 91 2.4. Cryopreservation of amoebae 2.4.1 Cryopreservation ........................................................................................ 92 2.4.2 Culture retrieval ......................................................................................... 93 2.5 Antigen preparation and antiserum production 2.5.1 Antigen Preparation ................................................................................... 93 2.5.2 Antiserum production in rabbits ................................................................ 94 2.5.3 Antiserum production in fish ..................................................................... 95 2.5.4 Serum preparation ...................................................................................... 96 2.6 Gill health assessment methods 2.6.1 Gross examination ..................................................................................... 97 2.6.2 Preparation of gill tissue for histological examination .............................. 97 2.6.3 Immunofluorescence antibody test (IF AT) ................................................ 98 2. 7 Immunostaining techniques 2.7.1 Immunofluorescence .................................................................................. 100 2.7.2 Immunoperoxidase .................................................................................... 100 2.7.3 Alkaline phosphatase ................................................................................. 101 2.8 Preparation of Paramoeba for electron microscopy .............. 102 2.9 Chemical screening assays 2.9.1 Preparation of chemicals ............................................................................ 103 2.9.2 Growth inhibition assay ............................................................................. 103 2.9.3 Contact inhibition assay ............................................................................. 106 2.10 ·Mucus antibody extraction 2.10.1 Gill perfusion ............................................................................................. 110 2.10.2 Antibody extraction from mucus ............................................................... 111 2.11 ELISA to detect Paramoeba antibodies in fish ........................ 111 Chapter 3. Isolation and verification of the pathogen 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 113 3.2 Methods .................................................................................................. 114 3.2.1 Isolation and characterisation .................................................................... 114 3.2.2 Verification of the pathogen ...................................................................... 121 3.2.3 Additional investigations ........................................................................... 127 3.3 Results ..................................................................................................... 131 3.3.1 Isolation and characterisation .................................................................... 131 3.3.2 Verification of the pathogen ...................................................................... 143 3.3.3 Additional investigations ........................................................................... 156 3.4 Discussion .............................................................................................. 163 3.4.1 Isolation and characterisation .................................................................... 163 3.4.2 Verification of the pathogen ...................................................................... 168 3.4.3 Gill health .................................................................................................. 177 3.4.4 Additional investigations ........................................................................... 181 3.5 Conclusions ........................................................................................... 184 Chapter 4. Pathogenicity of Paramoeba sp. 'AGD' 4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 186 4.2 Methods .................................................................................................. 187 4.2.1 Tank systems .............................................................................................. 187 4.2.2 The fish ...................................................................................................... 191 4.2.3 Disease assessment .................................................................................... 192 4.2.4 Culture challenges ..................................................................................... 192 4.2.5 Cohabitation challenges ............................................................................. 198 4.2.6 Electron microscopy .................................................................................. 199 4.3 Results ..................................................................................................... 200 4.3.1 Culture challenges ..................................................................................... 200 4.3.2 Cohabitation challenges ............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback

    A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback

    ARTICLE IN PRESS Hook, Line and Infection: A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback Alexander Stewart*, Joseph Jacksonx, Iain Barber{, Christophe Eizaguirrejj, Rachel Paterson*, Pieter van West#, Chris Williams** and Joanne Cable*,1 *Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom x University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom { University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom jj Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom #Institute of Medical Sciences, Aberdeen, United Kingdom **National Fisheries Service, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom 1Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Stickleback Husbandry 7 2.1 Ethics 7 2.2 Collection 7 2.3 Maintenance 9 2.4 Breeding sticklebacks in vivo and in vitro 10 2.5 Hatchery 15 3. Common Stickleback Parasite Cultures 16 3.1 Argulus foliaceus 17 3.1.1 Introduction 17 3.1.2 Source, culture and infection 18 3.1.3 Immunology 22 3.2 Camallanus lacustris 22 3.2.1 Introduction 22 3.2.2 Source, culture and infection 23 3.2.3 Immunology 25 3.3 Diplostomum Species 26 3.3.1 Introduction 26 3.3.2 Source, culture and infection 27 3.3.3 Immunology 28 Advances in Parasitology, Volume 98 ISSN 0065-308X © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2017.07.001 All rights reserved. 1 j ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 Alexander Stewart et al. 3.4 Glugea anomala 30 3.4.1 Introduction 30 3.4.2 Source, culture and infection 30 3.4.3 Immunology 31 3.5 Gyrodactylus Species 31 3.5.1 Introduction 31 3.5.2 Source, culture and infection 32 3.5.3 Immunology 34 3.6 Saprolegnia parasitica 35 3.6.1 Introduction 35 3.6.2 Source, culture and infection 36 3.6.3 Immunology 37 3.7 Schistocephalus solidus 38 3.7.1 Introduction 38 3.7.2 Source, culture and infection 39 3.7.3 Immunology 43 4.
  • Twenty Thousand Parasites Under The

    Twenty Thousand Parasites Under The

    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Departament de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia Tesis Doctoral Twenty thousand parasites under the sea: a multidisciplinary approach to parasite communities of deep-dwelling fishes from the slopes of the Balearic Sea (NW Mediterranean) Tesis doctoral presentada por Sara Maria Dallarés Villar para optar al título de Doctora en Acuicultura bajo la dirección de la Dra. Maite Carrassón López de Letona, del Dr. Francesc Padrós Bover y de la Dra. Montserrat Solé Rovira. La presente tesis se ha inscrito en el programa de doctorado en Acuicultura, con mención de calidad, de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Los directores Maite Carrassón Francesc Padrós Montserrat Solé López de Letona Bover Rovira Universitat Autònoma de Universitat Autònoma de Institut de Ciències Barcelona Barcelona del Mar (CSIC) La tutora La doctoranda Maite Carrassón Sara Maria López de Letona Dallarés Villar Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Bellaterra, diciembre de 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cuando miro atrás, al comienzo de esta tesis, me doy cuenta de cuán enriquecedora e importante ha sido para mí esta etapa, a todos los niveles.
  • Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus (VHSV): on the Search for Determinants Important for Virulence in Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus Mykiss

    Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus (VHSV): on the Search for Determinants Important for Virulence in Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus Mykiss

    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 08, 2017 Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss Olesen, Niels Jørgen; Skall, H. F.; Kurita, J.; Mori, K.; Ito, T. Published in: 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Olesen, N. J., Skall, H. F., Kurita, J., Mori, K., & Ito, T. (2015). Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss. In 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish: Abstract book (pp. 147-147). [O-139] Las Palmas: European Association of Fish Pathologists. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. DISCLAIMER: The organizer takes no responsibility for any of the content stated in the abstracts.
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 De Juan Et Al

    (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 De Juan Et Al

    US 200601 10428A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 de Juan et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 25, 2006 (54) METHODS AND DEVICES FOR THE Publication Classification TREATMENT OF OCULAR CONDITIONS (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventors: Eugene de Juan, LaCanada, CA (US); A6F 2/00 (2006.01) Signe E. Varner, Los Angeles, CA (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 424/427 (US); Laurie R. Lawin, New Brighton, MN (US) (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: Featured is a method for instilling one or more bioactive SCOTT PRIBNOW agents into ocular tissue within an eye of a patient for the Kagan Binder, PLLC treatment of an ocular condition, the method comprising Suite 200 concurrently using at least two of the following bioactive 221 Main Street North agent delivery methods (A)-(C): Stillwater, MN 55082 (US) (A) implanting a Sustained release delivery device com (21) Appl. No.: 11/175,850 prising one or more bioactive agents in a posterior region of the eye so that it delivers the one or more (22) Filed: Jul. 5, 2005 bioactive agents into the vitreous humor of the eye; (B) instilling (e.g., injecting or implanting) one or more Related U.S. Application Data bioactive agents Subretinally; and (60) Provisional application No. 60/585,236, filed on Jul. (C) instilling (e.g., injecting or delivering by ocular ion 2, 2004. Provisional application No. 60/669,701, filed tophoresis) one or more bioactive agents into the Vit on Apr. 8, 2005. reous humor of the eye. Patent Application Publication May 25, 2006 Sheet 1 of 22 US 2006/0110428A1 R 2 2 C.6 Fig.
  • Protistology Mitochondrial Genomes of Amoebozoa

    Protistology Mitochondrial Genomes of Amoebozoa

    Protistology 13 (4), 179–191 (2019) Protistology Mitochondrial genomes of Amoebozoa Natalya Bondarenko1, Alexey Smirnov1, Elena Nassonova1,2, Anna Glotova1,2 and Anna Maria Fiore-Donno3 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia 2 Laboratory of Cytology of Unicellular Organisms, Institute of Cytology RAS, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia 3 University of Cologne, Institute of Zoology, Terrestrial Ecology, 50674 Cologne, Germany | Submitted November 28, 2019 | Accepted December 10, 2019 | Summary In this mini-review, we summarize the current knowledge on mitochondrial genomes of Amoebozoa. Amoebozoa is a major, early-diverging lineage of eukaryotes, containing at least 2,400 species. At present, 32 mitochondrial genomes belonging to 18 amoebozoan species are publicly available. A dearth of information is particularly obvious for two major amoebozoan clades, Variosea and Tubulinea, with just one mitochondrial genome sequenced for each. The main focus of this review is to summarize features such as mitochondrial gene content, mitochondrial genome size variation, and presence or absence of RNA editing, showing if they are unique or shared among amoebozoan lineages. In addition, we underline the potential of mitochondrial genomes for multigene phylogenetic reconstruction in Amoebozoa, where the relationships among lineages are not fully resolved yet. With the increasing application of next-generation sequencing techniques and reliable protocols, we advocate mitochondrial
  • Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Organisms (WGPDMO)

    Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Organisms (WGPDMO)

    ICES WGPDMO REPORT 2018 AQUACULTURE STEERING GROUP ICES CM 2018/ASG:01 REF. ACOM, SCICOM Report of the Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Organisms (WGPDMO) 13-17 February 2018 Riga, Latvia International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2018. Report of the Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Or- ganisms (WGPDMO), 13-17 February 2018, Riga, Latvia. ICES CM 2018/ASG:01. 42 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8134 The material in this report may be reused using the recommended citation. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, images, graphs, etc. of which it has own- ership. For other third-party material cited in this report, you must contact the origi- nal copyright holder for permission. For citation of datasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on the ICES website. All extracts must be acknowledged. For other reproduction requests please contact the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2018 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGPDMO REPORT 2018 | i Contents Executive summary ...............................................................................................................
  • Detection of Paramoeba Perurans in Scotish Marine Wild Fish Populations

    Detection of Paramoeba Perurans in Scotish Marine Wild Fish Populations

    Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 35(6) 2015, 217 NOTE ȱȱParamoeba perurans in Ĵȱȱ ȱęȱ H. E. B. Stagg*, M. Hall, I. S. Wallace, C. C. Pert, S. Garcia Perez and C. Collins Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB Abstract ȱȱParamoeba perurans, ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱ ȱ ȱęȱȱĴȱȱ ȱǻȱƽȱŘǰřŚŞǼǯȱOverall, the apparent prevalence was low. A ȱęǰȱȱȱȱTrachurus trachurus, ȱǯȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱȱ ȱP. perurans in horse mackerel. Paramoeba perurans is an amoeba parasite and the Salmo salar and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus ȱȱȱȱȱȱǻ Ǽȱ mykiss (Munday et al., 1990); coho salmon O. (Young et al., 2007, Crosbie et al., 2012). The kisutchȱǻ ȱȱǯǰȱŗşŞŞǼDzȱ Scophthalmus ȱ ȱęȱȱȱȱȱŘŖŖŜȱ maximus ǻ¢ȱȱǯǰȱŗşşŞǼDzȱȱȱDicen- with additional outbreaks occurring since 2011 trarchus labrax (Dykova et al., 2000); chinook ȱȱȱ¢ȱ ȱȱȱęȱ salmon O. tshawytscha ǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼDzȱ ȱȱȱĴȱȱ¢ȱ ayu Plecoglossus altivelis (Crosbie et al., 2010); (Marine Scotland Science unpublished data). ballan wrasse Labrus bergylta (Karlsbakk et al., ȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱ 2013); blue warehou Seriolella brama (Adams (Shinn et al., 2014) especially in the Australian ȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼDzȱȱȱȱDiplodus puntazzo ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ (Dykova and Novoa, 2001). ȱȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱ ŗşŞŚȱǻ¢ǰȱŗşŞŜǼǯȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱęȱȱȱȱȱȱ reported in the USA (Kent et al., ŗşŞŞǼǰȱ ȱ P. peruransȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ (Rodger and McArdle, 1996), the Mediterranean ȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ǻ¢ȱȱǯǰȱŗşşŞǼǰȱ ȱȱǻȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ ǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼǰȱ ¢ȱǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼǰȱ ȱ ȱȱęǯȱȱǰȱP. perurans has only (Crosbie et al., 2010), Chile (Bustos et al., 2011) ȱȱȱęȱȱȱ- ȱȱȱȱǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŗŚǼǯȱ- ǯȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ ceptible species to AGD include: Atlantic salmon ȱȱ ȱParamoeba ǯȱȱ ȱęȱ * Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] ŘŗŞǰȱǯȱǯȱǯȱȱǯǰȱřśǻŜǼȱŘŖŗś ǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼȱ ȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱęȱȱȱ¢ȱǻ ȱ ȱȱ in Tasmania and tested ȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŗǼǯȱ¢ȱęȱ ȱȱ ȱ using histological and immunohistochemical each haul based on the approximate proportion techniques however, the amoeba species was ȱȱȱȱȱȱǰȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱP.
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016

    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016

    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
  • STEROGYL 15A Et

    STEROGYL 15A Et

    STEROGYL 15A and 15H Ergocalciferol Prophylaxis and/or treatment of vitamin D deficiency. FORMS and PRESENTATIONS Sterogyl 15 “A”: Oral solution 600,000 IU/1.5 ml (alcohol-based, colorless): Ampoule-vial filled to 1.5 ml, unit pack. Sterogyl 15 “H”: Oral and IM injection solution 600,000 IU/1.5 ml (oil-based, light yellow): Ampoule-vial filled to 1.5 ml, unit pack. COMPOSITION Sterogyl 15 “A”: per ampoule Ergocalciferol (INN) 600,000 IU Excipients: ethyl alcohol 96.2°, purified water. Inerting gas: nitrogen. Alcohol titer (v/v): 89.8°. Ethanol content: 1.06 g/amp. Sterogyl 15 “H”: per ampoule Ergocalciferol (INN) 600,000 IU Excipient: groundnut oil. Inerting gas: nitrogen. INDICATIONS Treatment and prophylaxis of vitamin D-deficient states. DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION Dosage: Restricted to adults. This dosage form is not suitable for children due to its high vitamin D content. ½ to 1 ampoule (equivalent to 300,000 to 600,000 IU vitamin D2), in a single dose, once a year. Treatment cost: Sterogyl 15 “A”: €0.80 to €1.60; Sterogyl 15 “H”: €0.85 to €1.69. Method of administration: Sterogyl 15 “A”: Do not drink this medicinal product pure. Dilute it in water or fruit juice. Sterogyl 15 “H“: IM route. The ampoule can also be administered by the oral route. CONTRAINDICATIONS Hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients. Hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, calcium lithiasis. WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS FOR USE Sterogyl 15 “A”: Note : this medicinal product has an alcohol titer of 90°, or approximately 1 g alcohol per ampoule. It is not recommended in patients with liver disease, alcoholism or epilepsy.
  • A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa

    A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa

    Protist, Vol. 162, 545–570, October 2011 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 28 July 2011 PROTIST NEWS A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa: Lobosa) Introduction together constitute the amoebozoan subphy- lum Lobosa, which never have cilia or flagella, Molecular evidence and an associated reevaluation whereas Variosea (as here revised) together with of morphology have recently considerably revised Mycetozoa and Archamoebea are now grouped our views on relationships among the higher-level as the subphylum Conosa, whose constituent groups of amoebae. First of all, establishing the lineages either have cilia or flagella or have lost phylum Amoebozoa grouped all lobose amoe- them secondarily (Cavalier-Smith 1998, 2009). boid protists, whether naked or testate, aerobic Figure 1 is a schematic tree showing amoebozoan or anaerobic, with the Mycetozoa and Archamoe- relationships deduced from both morphology and bea (Cavalier-Smith 1998), and separated them DNA sequences. from both the heterolobosean amoebae (Page and The first attempt to construct a congruent molec- Blanton 1985), now belonging in the phylum Per- ular and morphological system of Amoebozoa by colozoa - Cavalier-Smith and Nikolaev (2008), and Cavalier-Smith et al. (2004) was limited by the the filose amoebae that belong in other phyla lack of molecular data for many amoeboid taxa, (notably Cercozoa: Bass et al. 2009a; Howe et al. which were therefore classified solely on morpho- 2011). logical evidence. Smirnov et al. (2005) suggested The phylum Amoebozoa consists of naked and another system for naked lobose amoebae only; testate lobose amoebae (e.g. Amoeba, Vannella, this left taxa with no molecular data incertae sedis, Hartmannella, Acanthamoeba, Arcella, Difflugia), which limited its utility.
  • Host-Parasite Interaction of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) and the Ectoparasite Neoparamoeba Perurans in Amoebic Gill Disease

    Host-Parasite Interaction of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) and the Ectoparasite Neoparamoeba Perurans in Amoebic Gill Disease

    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 31 May 2021 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.672700 Host-Parasite Interaction of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and the Ectoparasite Neoparamoeba perurans in Amoebic Gill Disease † Natasha A. Botwright 1*, Amin R. Mohamed 1 , Joel Slinger 2, Paula C. Lima 1 and James W. Wynne 3 1 Livestock and Aquaculture, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, St Lucia, QLD, Australia, 2 Livestock and Aquaculture, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Woorim, QLD, Australia, 3 Livestock and Aquaculture, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Hobart, TAS, Australia Marine farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) are susceptible to recurrent amoebic gill disease Edited by: (AGD) caused by the ectoparasite Neoparamoeba perurans over the growout production Samuel A. M. Martin, University of Aberdeen, cycle. The parasite elicits a highly localized response within the gill epithelium resulting in United Kingdom multifocal mucoid patches at the site of parasite attachment. This host-parasite response Reviewed by: drives a complex immune reaction, which remains poorly understood. To generate a model Diego Robledo, for host-parasite interaction during pathogenesis of AGD in Atlantic salmon the local (gill) and University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom systemic transcriptomic response in the host, and the parasite during AGD pathogenesis was Maria K. Dahle, explored. A dual RNA-seq approach together with differential gene expression and system- Norwegian Veterinary Institute (NVI), Norway wide statistical analyses of gene and transcription factor networks was employed. A multi- *Correspondence: tissue transcriptomic data set was generated from the gill (including both lesioned and non- Natasha A. Botwright lesioned tissue), head kidney and spleen tissues naïve and AGD-affected Atlantic salmon [email protected] sourced from an in vivo AGD challenge trial.
  • Canadian Aquaculture R&D Review 2019

    Canadian Aquaculture R&D Review 2019

    AQUACULTURE ASSOCIATION OF CANADA SPECIAL PUBLICATION 26 2019 CANADIAN AQUACULTURE R&D REVIEW INSIDE Development of optimal diet for Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Acoustic monitoring of wild fish interactions with aquaculture sites Potential species as cleaner fish for sea lice on farmed salmon Piscine reovirus (PRV): characterization, susceptibility, prevalence, and transmission in Atlantic and Pacific Salmon Novel sensors for fish health and welfare Effect of climate change on the culture Blue Mussel (Mytilus edulis) Oyster aquaculture in an acidifying ocean Presence, extent, and impacts of microplastics on shellfish aquaculture Validation of a hydrodynamic model to support aquaculture in the West coast of Vancouver Island CANADIAN AQUACULTURE R&D REVIEW 2019 AAC Special Publication #26 ISBN: 978-0-9881415-9-9 © 2019 Aquaculture Association of Canada Cover Photo (Front): Cultivated sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) on a culture line at an aquaculture site. (Photo: Isabelle Gendron-Lemieux, Merinov) First Photo Inside Cover (Front): Mussels. (DFO, Gulf Region) Second Photo inside Cover (Front): American Lobsters (Homarus americanus) in a holding tank. (Jean-François Laplante, Merinov) Cover Photo (Back): Atlantic Salmon sea cages in southern Newfoundland. (KÖBB Media/DFO) The Canadian Aquaculture R&D Review 2019 has been published with support provided by Fisheries and Oceans Canada's Aquaculture Collaborative Research and Development Program (ACRDP), and by the Aquaculture Association of Canada (AAC). Submitted materials may have been edited for length and writing style. Projects not included in this edition should be submitted before the deadline to be set for the next edition. Editors: Tricia Gheorghe, Véronique Boucher Lalonde, Emily Ryall and G. Jay Parsons Cited as: T Gheorghe, V Boucher Lalonde, E Ryall, and GJ Parsons (eds).