DOCSLIB.ORG

Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus (VHSV): on the Search for Determinants Important for Virulence in Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus Mykiss

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus (VHSV): on the Search for Determinants Important for Virulence in Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus Mykiss Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 08, 2017 Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss Olesen, Niels Jørgen; Skall, H. F.; Kurita, J.; Mori, K.; Ito, T. Published in: 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Olesen, N. J., Skall, H. F., Kurita, J., Mori, K., & Ito, T. (2015). Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss. In 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish: Abstract book (pp. 147-147). [O-139] Las Palmas: European Association of Fish Pathologists. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. DISCLAIMER: The organizer takes no responsibility for any of the content stated in the abstracts. The abstract book contains abstracts as provided by their authors. No editing has been done except for spelling corrections. Published for: European Association of Fish Pathologists, 2015 Printed and bound in Las Palmas Copyright © European Association of Fish Pathologists, 2015 All rights reserved. No parts of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, xerography, or any information storage and removal system, without permission from the compiler. Picture front cover provide by Auditorium Alfredo Kraus 2 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Contents KEYNOTES Conference Keynote 5 Keynotes 2-4 6-8 ORAL PRESENTATIONS Viruses and viral diseases I 9 Immunosstimulamts, prebiotics and probiotics 14 Parasitic diseases I 21 Fish and shellfish immunology I 28 Parasitic diseases II 34 Nutrition and fish health 44 Aquatic fish epidemiology 49 Fish and shellfish immunology II 57 Emerging pathogens I 64 Bivalve and crustacean diseases I 71 Viruses and viral diseases II 76 Host-parasite interactions I 83 Bivalve and crustacean diseases II 90 Bacterial diseases I 96 Bacterial diseases II 105 Diagnostics 112 Environmental and toxicological diseases 120 Diseases of tuna 124 Bacterial diseases II 128 Host-parasite interactions II 135 Aquatic animal welfare I 142 Viruses and viral diseases III 146 Emerging pathogens II 153 Aquatic animal welfare II 160 Diseases of public concern 163 Fish and shellfish immunology III 167 Bacterial diseases IV 174 Fish and shellfish immunology IV 180 Prophylaxis and treatment I 187 Viruses and viral diseases IV 194 Cephalopods immunity and diseases 201 Prophylaxis and treatment II 209 Diseases of wild and ornamental fish 211 Fish and shellfish immunology V 215 Host-parasite interactions III 219 POSTER PRESENTATIONS Viruses and viral diseases 225 Immunosstimulamts, prebiotics and probiotics 257 Parasitic diseases 261 3 Fish and shellfish immunology 280 Nutrition and fish health 318 Aquatic fish epidemiology 325 Emerging pathogens 337 Bivalve and crustacean diseases 348 EDQM 356 Bacterial diseases 358 Diagnostics 380 Environmental and toxicological diseases 390 Host-parasite interactions 400 Aquatic animal welfare 417 Diseases of public concern 419 Prophylaxis and treatment 423 Cephalopods immunity and diseases 431 Diseases of wild and ornamental fish 437 WORKSHOPS WS1 Arraina 445 WS2 Mendeley 446 WS3 Novel cyprinid viruses 447 WS4 EDQM 448 WS5 Fish health in Med. aquaculture, past mistakes and future challenges 449 WS6 Publish or perish - scientific publishing workshop 450 WS7 AGD 451 WS8 Moltraq 452 WS9 Industry roundtable TargetFish 453 AUTHORS’ CONTACTS 454 4 CKN Conference keynote CHALLENGING THE DOGMA SURROUNDING THE STUDY OF BACTERIAL FISH DISEASES B. AUSTIN Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK Since the late nineteenth century, the acquisition of pure bacterial cultures has been central to all facets of microbiology. Fish pathology is no exception insofar as the goal of disease diagnostics and research is the acquisition of pure cultures of the pathogen. The basic premise is that pathological material may be inoculated onto a solid (usually gelled with agar) or into a liquid medium with incubation for a pre- determined interval when individual cells of the pathogen will be cloned into dense culture growth, which will then be subjected to further study. However, the range of media used by fish bacteriologists is restricted, and often centres on tryptone soya agar/broth, brain heart infusion agar/broth and/or marine equivalents. Moreover, the incubation regimes may have little relevance to the growth conditions of the fish. However, the desired outcome is the presence of dense virtually pure growth, which is taken as indicative of recovery of the pathogen. Unfortunately at best, a snap shot of the disease is obtained, and it may not be possible to decide if only one organism instigated the infection, and then contributed to the development of overt disease signs. It is unlikely that culturing on a single occasion would identify microbial population succession within a disease cycle. Also, conventional techniques are unlikely to recognise when two or more discrete organisms working synergistically to produce a single pathology. This situation has been observed with ulcerative conditions in cyprinids when Aeromonas salmonicida and A. hydrophila/ A. sobria may be involved together, with the former instigating infection, and the latter leading to the developing of large ulcers. Certainly, it is realized that not all cells will multiply sufficiently to produce visible colonies. Some cells produce micro-colonies that are invisible to the naked eye. Moreover, the proportion of culturable cells that produce visible growth will vary according to the species and the state of the cells – are they actively growing or comparatively inactive? The latter have a poorer rate of recovery in terms of culturability. The next premise is that an individual colony is derived from multiplication of a single cell. Yet, it is realized that cells in close proximity to each other may multiply and come together to produce a single colony. Then, the resultant growth will most certainly be derived from more than one initial cell. This has greater relevance if the two initial cells are from two different species. Although it is generally assumed that streaking and re-streaking on fresh media will purify any culture, there is evidence for microbial consortia interacting to form what appear to be single pure cultures. Thus, seemingly pure cultures of purple-pigmented aquatic bacteria were recognized to contain cells of A. salmonicida. As so-called pure cultures underpin most of microbiology, it is relevant to understand that the culture does not necessarily contain clones of identical bacteria, but that there is a variation in the genetic potential of the component cells, i.e. the cells are not homogeneous. Certainly, many bacteria change rapidly upon culturing in the laboratory. Cells may become bigger and less active in the laboratory, i.e. genetic potential is lost. It is difficult to be sure if the changes reflect a loss of DNA or whether standard culturing methods select faster growing cells that are effectively not representative of the environment from which they were derived. 5 KN-­‐2 AQUATIC VERSUS NON-AQUATIC HERPESVIRUSES: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES A. VANDERPLASSCHEN Immunology-Vaccinology, Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium The order Herpesvirales encompasses viruses that share structural, genetic and biological properties. However, members of this order infect hosts ranging from molluscs to humans. It is currently divided into three phylogenetically related families. The Herpesviridae family encompasses viruses infecting mammals, birds or reptiles. It is by far the most important, in terms both of the number of its members and the volume of studies that have been devoted to them. The Alloherpesviridae family encompasses viruses infecting fish and amphibians. And finally, the Malacoherpesviridae family comprises viruses infecting molluscs. Over the last decade, an increasing number of studies have been devoted to alloherpesviruses and malacoherpesviruses. Scientific interest in these viruses tends to originate from their impact on wildlife, the economic losses they cause to the aquaculture industry, or their importance as fundamental research object. In this talk, we will review the similarities and the differences existing between herpesviruses infecting aquatic and non-aquatic animals. 6 KN-­‐3 WHAT’S NEW IN BIVALVE MOLLUSC PATHOLOGY? OVERVIEW OF ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN THE LAST TWO YEARS A. VILLALBA Centro de Investigacións Mariñas (CIMA), Consellería
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Hook, Line and Infection: A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback Alexander Stewart*, Joseph Jacksonx, Iain Barber{, Christophe Eizaguirrejj, Rachel Paterson*, Pieter van West#, Chris Williams** and Joanne Cable*,1 *Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom x University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom { University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom jj Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom #Institute of Medical Sciences, Aberdeen, United Kingdom **National Fisheries Service, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom 1Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Stickleback Husbandry 7 2.1 Ethics 7 2.2 Collection 7 2.3 Maintenance 9 2.4 Breeding sticklebacks in vivo and in vitro 10 2.5 Hatchery 15 3. Common Stickleback Parasite Cultures 16 3.1 Argulus foliaceus 17 3.1.1 Introduction 17 3.1.2 Source, culture and infection 18 3.1.3 Immunology 22 3.2 Camallanus lacustris 22 3.2.1 Introduction 22 3.2.2 Source, culture and infection 23 3.2.3 Immunology 25 3.3 Diplostomum Species 26 3.3.1 Introduction 26 3.3.2 Source, culture and infection 27 3.3.3 Immunology 28 Advances in Parasitology, Volume 98 ISSN 0065-308X © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2017.07.001 All rights reserved. 1 j ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 Alexander Stewart et al. 3.4 Glugea anomala 30 3.4.1 Introduction 30 3.4.2 Source, culture and infection 30 3.4.3 Immunology 31 3.5 Gyrodactylus Species 31 3.5.1 Introduction 31 3.5.2 Source, culture and infection 32 3.5.3 Immunology 34 3.6 Saprolegnia parasitica 35 3.6.1 Introduction 35 3.6.2 Source, culture and infection 36 3.6.3 Immunology 37 3.7 Schistocephalus solidus 38 3.7.1 Introduction 38 3.7.2 Source, culture and infection 39 3.7.3 Immunology 43 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Thousand Parasites Under The
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Departament de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia Tesis Doctoral Twenty thousand parasites under the sea: a multidisciplinary approach to parasite communities of deep-dwelling fishes from the slopes of the Balearic Sea (NW Mediterranean) Tesis doctoral presentada por Sara Maria Dallarés Villar para optar al título de Doctora en Acuicultura bajo la dirección de la Dra. Maite Carrassón López de Letona, del Dr. Francesc Padrós Bover y de la Dra. Montserrat Solé Rovira. La presente tesis se ha inscrito en el programa de doctorado en Acuicultura, con mención de calidad, de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Los directores Maite Carrassón Francesc Padrós Montserrat Solé López de Letona Bover Rovira Universitat Autònoma de Universitat Autònoma de Institut de Ciències Barcelona Barcelona del Mar (CSIC) La tutora La doctoranda Maite Carrassón Sara Maria López de Letona Dallarés Villar Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Bellaterra, diciembre de 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cuando miro atrás, al comienzo de esta tesis, me doy cuenta de cuán enriquecedora e importante ha sido para mí esta etapa, a todos los niveles.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Health Assessment of Glass Eels from Canadian Maritime Rivers
    Fish Health Assessment of Glass Eels from Canadian Maritime Rivers D. Groman, R. Threader, D. Wadowska, T. Maynard and L. Blimke Aquatic Diagnostic Services, Atlantic Veterinary College Ontario Power Generation Electron Microscopy Laboratory, Atlantic Veterinary College Kleinschimidt Associates Project Background Objective - Capture glass eels in NS/NB for stocking in Great Lakes Watershed Protocol - Transfer glass eels to quarantine Health Assessment ( G. L. F. H. C.) OTC Marking of glass eels Transfer and stocking ( Ontario & Quebec ) 1 Glass Eel / Elver Glass Eel Transport Bag 2 Glass Eel Acclimation and Transfer Boat Glass Eel Transfer 3 Glass Eel Stocking Glass Eel Stocking Data Number Purchase kg Price Stocking Stocking Number of Eels Mean Length Mean Mass Year Purchased (per kg) Date Location Stocked (mm) (g) Mallorytown 2006 102.07 $ 637 Oct. 12, 2006 166,7741 0.69 (n = 25) Landing Mallorytown 2007 151 $ 1,310 – $ 1,415 June 21, 2007 436,907 59.2 (n=49; ±0.5) Landing Mallorytown 0.17 May 15, 2008 797,475 60.9 (n=40; ±0.6) Landing (n=40; ±0.0006) 2008 370 $ 630 - $ 805 Mallorytown 0.14 May 29, 2008 518,358 60.4 (n=40; ±0.5) Landing (n=40; ±0.0004) June 11, 2008 Deseronto 685,728 56.5 (n=40; ±0.5) 0.14 (n=40; ±0.006) 651,521 June 2, 2009 Deseronto 59.14 (n=246; ±4.0) 0.18 (n=246; ±4.0) (±47,269) 2009 299 $ 630 Mallorytown 651,521 June 2, 2009 59.14 (n=246; ±4.0) 0.18 (n=246; ±0.04) Landing (±47,269) Estimated Total Number of Eels Stocked from 2006 - 2009 3,908,284 4 Health Assessment Objective - To screen subsamples of glass eel
    [Show full text]
  • Oryzias Latipes)
    Betanodavirus infection in the freshwater model fish medaka (Oryzias latipes) Ryo Furusawa, Yasushi Okinaka,* and Toshihiro Nakai Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-hiroshima 739- 8528, Japan æfAuthor for correspondence: Yasushi Okinaka. Telephone: +8 1-82-424-7978. Fax: +81- 82-424-79 1 6. E-mail: [email protected] Running title: Betanodavirus infection in medaka Key words: medaka, betanodavirus, model fish, model virus, freshwater fish Total number of words; text (3532 words), summary (230 words) Total number of figures; 6 figures Total number of tables; 0 table SUMMARY Betanodaviruses, the causal agents of viral nervous necrosis in marine fish, have bipartite positive-sense RNA genomes. Because the genomes are the smallest and simplest among viruses, betanodaviruses are well studied using a genetic engineering system as model viruses, like the cases with the insect viruses, alphanodaviruses, the other members of the family Nodaviridae. However, studies of virus-host interactions have been limited because betanodaviruses basically infect marine fish at early developmental stages (larval and juvenile). These fish are only available for a few months of the year and are not suitable for the construction of a reversed genetics system. To overcome these problems, several freshwater fish species were tested for their susceptibility to betanodaviruses. We have demonstrated that adult medaka (Oryzias latipes), a well-known model fish, is susceptible to both Stripedjack nervous necrosis virus (the type species of the betanodaviruses) and Redspotted grouper nervous necrosis virus which have different host specificity in marine fish species. Infected medaka exhibited erratic swimming and the viruses were specifically localized to the brain, spinal cord, and retina of the infected fish, similar to the pattern of infection in naturally infected marine fish.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Genetic Diversity
    1.13 NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY Dennis P. Gordon National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington 6022, New Zealand ABSTRACT: The known genetic diversity represented by the New Zealand biota is reviewed and summarised, largely based on a recently published New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. All kingdoms and eukaryote phyla are covered, updated to refl ect the latest phylogenetic view of Eukaryota. The total known biota comprises a nominal 57 406 species (c. 48 640 described). Subtraction of the 4889 naturalised-alien species gives a biota of 52 517 native species. A minimum (the status of a number of the unnamed species is uncertain) of 27 380 (52%) of these species are endemic (cf. 26% for Fungi, 38% for all marine species, 46% for marine Animalia, 68% for all Animalia, 78% for vascular plants and 91% for terrestrial Animalia). In passing, examples are given both of the roles of the major taxa in providing ecosystem services and of the use of genetic resources in the New Zealand economy. Key words: Animalia, Chromista, freshwater, Fungi, genetic diversity, marine, New Zealand, Prokaryota, Protozoa, terrestrial. INTRODUCTION Article 10b of the CBD calls for signatories to ‘Adopt The original brief for this chapter was to review New Zealand’s measures relating to the use of biological resources [i.e. genetic genetic resources. The OECD defi nition of genetic resources resources] to avoid or minimize adverse impacts on biological is ‘genetic material of plants, animals or micro-organisms of diversity [e.g. genetic diversity]’ (my parentheses).
    [Show full text]
  • June 2021 Appendix 11: Approved Animal Drugs for Aqua
    APPENDIX 11: APPROVED ANIMAL DRUGS FOR AQUACULTURE USE This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the telephone number listed on the title page of this guidance. APPROVED ANIMAL DRUGS FOR AQUACULTURE Species/Class: Freshwater-reared salmonids, walleye, and freshwater-reared warmwater Animal Drugs for aquacultured food fish must meet finfish human food safety standards assessed during the approval process. When a fish producer (farmer) Indication for Use (21 CFR 529.382): or hatchery manager uses an approved drug for food fish as directed on the label, the treated fish • For the control of mortality in freshwater- are safe to eat. reared salmonids due to bacterial gill disease associated with Flavobacterium spp. The FDA-approved animal drugs for use in • For the control of mortality in walleye due aquaculture, with information on their approved to external columnaris disease associated sponsor/supplier, species for which the approval with Flavobacterium columnare. has been granted, required withdrawal periods, • For the control of mortality in freshwater- and other conditions are listed below. Additional reared warmwater finfish due to external details on provisions of use (e.g., administration columnaris disease associated with route, dosage level) can be obtained from Flavobacterium columnare.
    [Show full text]
  • Are All Species of Pseudorhabdosynochus Strictly Host Specific? – a Molecular Study
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by HAL-CEA Are all species of Pseudorhabdosynochus strictly host specific? - a molecular study Charlotte Schoelinck, Corinne Cruaud, Jean-Lou Justine To cite this version: Charlotte Schoelinck, Corinne Cruaud, Jean-Lou Justine. Are all species of Pseudorhabdosyn- ochus strictly host specific? - a molecular study. Parasitology International, Elsevier, 2012, 61, 10.1016/j.parint.2012.01.009. <10.1016/j.parint.2012.01.009>. <mnhn-00673113> HAL Id: mnhn-00673113 https://hal-mnhn.archives-ouvertes.fr/mnhn-00673113 Submitted on 22 Feb 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. Parasitology International, in press 2012 – DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2012.01.009 Are all species of Pseudorhabdosynochus strictly host specific? – a molecular study Charlotte Schoelinck (a, b) Corinne Cruaud (c), Jean-Lou Justine (a) (a) UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Systématique et Évolution, CP 51, 55 Rue Buffon, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France. (b) Service de Systématique moléculaire (CNRS-MNHN, UMS2700), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Département Systématique et Évolution, CP 26, 43 Rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Organisms (WGPDMO)
    ICES WGPDMO REPORT 2018 AQUACULTURE STEERING GROUP ICES CM 2018/ASG:01 REF. ACOM, SCICOM Report of the Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Organisms (WGPDMO) 13-17 February 2018 Riga, Latvia International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2018. Report of the Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Or- ganisms (WGPDMO), 13-17 February 2018, Riga, Latvia. ICES CM 2018/ASG:01. 42 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8134 The material in this report may be reused using the recommended citation. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, images, graphs, etc. of which it has own- ership. For other third-party material cited in this report, you must contact the origi- nal copyright holder for permission. For citation of datasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on the ICES website. All extracts must be acknowledged. For other reproduction requests please contact the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2018 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGPDMO REPORT 2018 | i Contents Executive summary ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proteome Analysis Reveals a Role of Rainbow Trout Lymphoid Organs During Yersinia Ruckeri Infection Process
    www.nature.com/scientificreports Correction: Author Correction OPEN Proteome analysis reveals a role of rainbow trout lymphoid organs during Yersinia ruckeri infection Received: 14 February 2018 Accepted: 30 August 2018 process Published online: 18 September 2018 Gokhlesh Kumar 1, Karin Hummel2, Katharina Noebauer2, Timothy J. Welch3, Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli2 & Mansour El-Matbouli1 Yersinia ruckeri is the causative agent of enteric redmouth disease in salmonids. Head kidney and spleen are major lymphoid organs of the teleost fsh where antigen presentation and immune defense against microbes take place. We investigated proteome alteration in head kidney and spleen of the rainbow trout following Y. ruckeri strains infection. Organs were analyzed after 3, 9 and 28 days post exposure with a shotgun proteomic approach. GO annotation and protein-protein interaction were predicted using bioinformatic tools. Thirty four proteins from head kidney and 85 proteins from spleen were found to be diferentially expressed in rainbow trout during the Y. ruckeri infection process. These included lysosomal, antioxidant, metalloproteinase, cytoskeleton, tetraspanin, cathepsin B and c-type lectin receptor proteins. The fndings of this study regarding the immune response at the protein level ofer new insight into the systemic response to Y. ruckeri infection in rainbow trout. This proteomic data facilitate a better understanding of host-pathogen interactions and response of fsh against Y. ruckeri biotype 1 and 2 strains. Protein-protein interaction analysis predicts carbon metabolism, ribosome and phagosome pathways in spleen of infected fsh, which might be useful in understanding biological processes and further studies in the direction of pathways. Enteric redmouth disease (ERM) causes signifcant economic losses in salmonids worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Paramoeba Perurans in Scotish Marine Wild Fish Populations
    Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 35(6) 2015, 217 NOTE ȱȱParamoeba perurans in Ĵȱȱ ȱęȱ H. E. B. Stagg*, M. Hall, I. S. Wallace, C. C. Pert, S. Garcia Perez and C. Collins Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB Abstract ȱȱParamoeba perurans, ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱ ȱ ȱęȱȱĴȱȱ ȱǻȱƽȱŘǰřŚŞǼǯȱOverall, the apparent prevalence was low. A ȱęǰȱȱȱȱTrachurus trachurus, ȱǯȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱȱ ȱP. perurans in horse mackerel. Paramoeba perurans is an amoeba parasite and the Salmo salar and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus ȱȱȱȱȱȱǻ Ǽȱ mykiss (Munday et al., 1990); coho salmon O. (Young et al., 2007, Crosbie et al., 2012). The kisutchȱǻ ȱȱǯǰȱŗşŞŞǼDzȱ Scophthalmus ȱ ȱęȱȱȱȱȱŘŖŖŜȱ maximus ǻ¢ȱȱǯǰȱŗşşŞǼDzȱȱȱDicen- with additional outbreaks occurring since 2011 trarchus labrax (Dykova et al., 2000); chinook ȱȱȱ¢ȱ ȱȱȱęȱ salmon O. tshawytscha ǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼDzȱ ȱȱȱĴȱȱ¢ȱ ayu Plecoglossus altivelis (Crosbie et al., 2010); (Marine Scotland Science unpublished data). ballan wrasse Labrus bergylta (Karlsbakk et al., ȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱ 2013); blue warehou Seriolella brama (Adams (Shinn et al., 2014) especially in the Australian ȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼDzȱȱȱȱDiplodus puntazzo ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ (Dykova and Novoa, 2001). ȱȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱ ŗşŞŚȱǻ¢ǰȱŗşŞŜǼǯȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱęȱȱȱȱȱȱ reported in the USA (Kent et al., ŗşŞŞǼǰȱ ȱ P. peruransȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ (Rodger and McArdle, 1996), the Mediterranean ȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ǻ¢ȱȱǯǰȱŗşşŞǼǰȱ ȱȱǻȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ ǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼǰȱ ¢ȱǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼǰȱ ȱ ȱȱęǯȱȱǰȱP. perurans has only (Crosbie et al., 2010), Chile (Bustos et al., 2011) ȱȱȱęȱȱȱ- ȱȱȱȱǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŗŚǼǯȱ- ǯȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ ceptible species to AGD include: Atlantic salmon ȱȱ ȱParamoeba ǯȱȱ ȱęȱ * Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] ŘŗŞǰȱǯȱǯȱǯȱȱǯǰȱřśǻŜǼȱŘŖŗś ǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼȱ ȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱęȱȱȱ¢ȱǻ ȱ ȱȱ in Tasmania and tested ȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŗǼǯȱ¢ȱęȱ ȱȱ ȱ using histological and immunohistochemical each haul based on the approximate proportion techniques however, the amoeba species was ȱȱȱȱȱȱǰȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱP.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Perch Rhabdovirus (PRV) in Farmed Grayling Thymallus Thymallus
    Vol. 106: 117–127, 2013 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published October 11 doi: 10.3354/dao02654 Dis Aquat Org FREEREE ACCESSCCESS Characterization of perch rhabdovirus (PRV) in farmed grayling Thymallus thymallus Tuija Gadd1,*, Satu Viljamaa-Dirks2, Riikka Holopainen1, Perttu Koski3, Miia Jakava-Viljanen1,4 1Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Mustialankatu 3, 00790 Helsinki, Finland 2Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Neulaniementie, 70210 Kuopio, Finland 3Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Elektroniikkatie 3, 90590 Oulu, Finland 4Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, PO Box 30, 00023 Government, Finland ABSTRACT: Two Finnish fish farms experienced elevated mortality rates in farmed grayling Thy- mallus thymallus fry during the summer months, most typically in July. The mortalities occurred during several years and were connected with a few neurological disorders and peritonitis. Viro- logical investigation detected an infection with an unknown rhabdovirus. Based on the entire gly- coprotein (G) and partial RNA polymerase (L) gene sequences, the virus was classified as a perch rhabdovirus (PRV). Pairwise comparisons of the G and L gene regions of grayling isolates revealed that all isolates were very closely related, with 99 to 100% nucleotide identity, which suggests the same origin of infection. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that they were closely related to the strain isolated from perch Perca fluviatilis and sea trout Salmo trutta trutta caught from the Baltic Sea. The entire G gene sequences revealed that all Finnish grayling isolates, and both the perch and sea trout isolates, were most closely related to a PRV isolated in France in 2004. According to the partial L gene sequences, all of the Finnish grayling isolates were most closely related to the Danish isolate DK5533 from pike.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Coral Reef Fish: How Much Do We Know? with a Bibliography of Fish Parasites in New Caledonia
    Belg. J. Zool., 140 (Suppl.): 155-190 July 2010 Parasites of coral reef fish: how much do we know? With a bibliography of fish parasites in New Caledonia Jean-Lou Justine (1) UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57, rue Cuvier, F-75321 Paris Cedex 05, France (2) Aquarium des lagons, B.P. 8185, 98807 Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie Corresponding author: Jean-Lou Justine; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A compilation of 107 references dealing with fish parasites in New Caledonia permitted the production of a parasite-host list and a host-parasite list. The lists include Turbellaria, Monopisthocotylea, Polyopisthocotylea, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda, Copepoda, Isopoda, Acanthocephala and Hirudinea, with 580 host-parasite combinations, corresponding with more than 370 species of parasites. Protozoa are not included. Platyhelminthes are the major group, with 239 species, including 98 monopisthocotylean monogeneans and 105 digeneans. Copepods include 61 records, and nematodes include 41 records. The list of fish recorded with parasites includes 195 species, in which most (ca. 170 species) are coral reef associated, the rest being a few deep-sea, pelagic or freshwater fishes. The serranids, lethrinids and lutjanids are the most commonly represented fish families. Although a list of published records does not provide a reliable estimate of biodiversity because of the important bias in publications being mainly in the domain of interest of the authors, it provides a basis to compare parasite biodiversity with other localities, and especially with other coral reefs. The present list is probably the most complete published account of parasite biodiversity of coral reef fishes.
    [Show full text]