DOCSLIB.ORG

Detection of Paramoeba Perurans in Scotish Marine Wild Fish Populations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Detection of Paramoeba Perurans in Scotish Marine Wild Fish Populations Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 35(6) 2015, 217 NOTE ȱȱParamoeba perurans in Ĵȱȱ ȱęȱ H. E. B. Stagg*, M. Hall, I. S. Wallace, C. C. Pert, S. Garcia Perez and C. Collins Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB Abstract ȱȱParamoeba perurans, ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱ ȱ ȱęȱȱĴȱȱ ȱǻȱƽȱŘǰřŚŞǼǯȱOverall, the apparent prevalence was low. A ȱęǰȱȱȱȱTrachurus trachurus, ȱǯȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱȱ ȱP. perurans in horse mackerel. Paramoeba perurans is an amoeba parasite and the Salmo salar and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus ȱȱȱȱȱȱǻ Ǽȱ mykiss (Munday et al., 1990); coho salmon O. (Young et al., 2007, Crosbie et al., 2012). The kisutchȱǻ ȱȱǯǰȱŗşŞŞǼDzȱ Scophthalmus ȱ ȱęȱȱȱȱȱŘŖŖŜȱ maximus ǻ¢ȱȱǯǰȱŗşşŞǼDzȱȱȱDicen- with additional outbreaks occurring since 2011 trarchus labrax (Dykova et al., 2000); chinook ȱȱȱ¢ȱ ȱȱȱęȱ salmon O. tshawytscha ǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼDzȱ ȱȱȱĴȱȱ¢ȱ ayu Plecoglossus altivelis (Crosbie et al., 2010); (Marine Scotland Science unpublished data). ballan wrasse Labrus bergylta (Karlsbakk et al., ȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱ 2013); blue warehou Seriolella brama (Adams (Shinn et al., 2014) especially in the Australian ȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼDzȱȱȱȱDiplodus puntazzo ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ (Dykova and Novoa, 2001). ȱȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱ ŗşŞŚȱǻ¢ǰȱŗşŞŜǼǯȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱęȱȱȱȱȱȱ reported in the USA (Kent et al., ŗşŞŞǼǰȱ ȱ P. peruransȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ (Rodger and McArdle, 1996), the Mediterranean ȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ǻ¢ȱȱǯǰȱŗşşŞǼǰȱ ȱȱǻȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ ǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼǰȱ ¢ȱǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼǰȱ ȱ ȱȱęǯȱȱǰȱP. perurans has only (Crosbie et al., 2010), Chile (Bustos et al., 2011) ȱȱȱęȱȱȱ- ȱȱȱȱǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŗŚǼǯȱ- ǯȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ ceptible species to AGD include: Atlantic salmon ȱȱ ȱParamoeba ǯȱȱ ȱęȱ * Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] ŘŗŞǰȱǯȱǯȱǯȱȱǯǰȱřśǻŜǼȱŘŖŗś ǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼȱ ȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱęȱȱȱ¢ȱǻ ȱ ȱȱ in Tasmania and tested ȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŗǼǯȱ¢ȱęȱ ȱȱ ȱ using histological and immunohistochemical each haul based on the approximate proportion techniques however, the amoeba species was ȱȱȱȱȱȱǰȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱP. perurans here ȱȱęǯȱ ȱȱęǯȱȱȱ¢ȱ ȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ ęȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱP. perurans ȱȱȱȱP. peruransȱȱ ȱȱ ǻȬ ȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŘǼǰȱęȱȱ- ęȱȱȱ ǯȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱřŘśȱ species sampled is shown in Table 1. A section ȱęȱȱȱ¡ȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱęȱȱǰȱȱȱȱ ǯȱȱęȱ ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ ȱȱȱęȱȱȱȱȱȱĚ- ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ ęǰȱ ȱ¢ȱȱȱŗŖŖƖȱȱ AGD was present. This study was conducted (Sigma) and stored at 4 °C prior to processing. when Neoparamoeba pemaquidensis was thought ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ǰȱȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱěȱ ȱȱȱP. perurans was not determined, (Qiagen) with 7 mm stainless steel beads using no paramoeba, or AGD lesions were observed the Qiagen TissueLyser system (Qiagen) at a ȱ¢ȱȱȱȱǯ ¢ȱȱŘśȱ £ȱȱȱȱȱŚȱǯȱ ȱȱ ȱ¡ȱȱśȱȱȱ ȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱP. perurans was ȱȱ¢¢ȱȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱęȱȱȱ QIAsymphony DNA DSP kit (Qiagen) using ȱȱȱǰȱȱȱȱȱ the Tissue LC 200 DSP protocol with an elution ȱȱȱȱ ȱęȱȱȱȱ ȱȱŘŖŖȱΐǯȱ reservoir species. Determining this background ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱ- Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) ȱ¢ȱȱȱǰȱǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱ- ȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱǰȱ ¢ȱŚŞŖȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱP. perurans Toughmix (Quanta BioScience) with primers may be expected during an AGD outbreak in and probes as described by Fringuellli et al. ȱȱǰȱ ȱȱę¢ȱ (2012) and detailed in Table 2. A single universal targeted in this survey. ęȱȱȱǰȱȱȱ ŗŞȱǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ǰȱęȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱ DNA quality and quantity. Samples were con- ȱǻȱȱŚŜȱȮȱŗşŘȱǼȱȱ- ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱĴȱȱ£ȱǻȱ ȱȱęȱ ȱǯȱȱ ŗǼȱȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ positive by qPCR, and samples generating am- ęȱ ȱȱȱŘŖŗřǯȱȱ ȱ biguous results, where only one replicate had methods have previously been reported as a a late Cp value, were subjected to nested PCR Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 35(6) 2015, 219 Figure 1.ȱęȱ ȱȱȱĴȱȱ ǯȱȱȱǻS) indicates sampling location ȱȱęȱ ȱȱȱParamoeba perurans. White circle ({) indicates sampling location where one ęȱ ȱȱȱP. perurans. 220, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 35(6) 2015 Table 1.ȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱȱȱȱȱǰȱȱ¢ȱǯ Fish Species Number Number Common Name Scientięc Name Sampled Positive ȱǻęǼ Lophius piscatorius 30 Blue whiting Micromesistius poutassou 163 0 Common dab Limanda limanda 95 0 Cod Gadus morhua 45 0 ȱ Phycis blennoides 50 Grey gurnard Eutrigla gurnardus 45 0 Goldsinny wrasse Ctenolabrus rupestris 10 Haddock ȱę ŘşŞ 0 Hake Merluccius merluccius 57 0 Herring Clupea harengus 259 0 Horse mackerel (scad) Trachurus trachurus 21 Lesser argentine Argentina sphyraena 16 0 Ling Molva molva 20 Long rough dab Hippoglossoides platessoides ŘŞ 0 Lemon sole ȱĴ 12 0 Lumpsucker Cyclopterus lumpus 10 Common dragonet Callionymus lyra 70 Mackerel Scomber scombrus 12 0 Megrim ȱ Ĝ 40 Norway pout Trisopterus esmarkii 597 0 Poor cod Trisopterus minutus 147 0 Plaice Pleuronectes platessa 62 0 Saithe Pollachius virens 54 0 Red gurnard Aspitrigla cuculus 22 0 Silvery pout Gadiculus argenteus 10 Sprat ĴȱĴ 134 0 Sea trout ȱĴ 10 Whiting Merlangius merlangus 275 0 Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 35(6) 2015, 221 Table 2. Primer and probe sequences used in this study. The Paramoeba perurans qPCR assay has been ȱ¢ȱȱȱǯȱǻŘŖŗŘǼǰȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱŗŞȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱęȱǯȱȱęȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱŗȱǻȱȱǯǰȱŗşşŝǼȱȱȱȱŗŖŚśȱǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼǰȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱǯȱǻŘŖŖŞǼǯ Assay Primer/probe name Primer/probe sequence Peru For 5’-GTTCTTTCGGGAGCTGGGAG-3’ Paramoeba perurans Peru Rev 5’-GAACTATCGCCGGCACAAAAG-3’ QPCR Peru probe 6FAM CAATGCCATTCTTTTCGGA-MGB UNIFISHFOR 5’-CCTGCGGCTTAATTTGACTCA-3’ Endogenous control UNIFISHREV 5’-AAAGAGCTATCAATCTGTCAATCCTTT-3’ QPCR UNIFISHPROBE 6FAM-CTCACCCGGCCCGGACACG-MGB ȱȱęȱ ERB1 5’-ACCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAG-3’ round Np1045r 5’-CTGTCCCTTTTAATCATTACACTTC-3’ Nested PCR second YOUNG F 5’-ATCTTGACYGGTTCTTTCGRGA-3’ round YOUNG R 5’-ATAGGTCTGCTTATCACTYATTCT-3’ ȱȱȱȱǰȱȱȱęȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱ negative results by an alternative method, re- water were included in extraction, qPCR and ¢ǯȱ ȱ¢ȱ¢ȱȱȱ ȱǯȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ¢ǰȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ ȱȱ ȱȱ¡ȱȱȱȱP. perurans ȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱǻȱęȱ¢ȱǰȱȱ assay (data not shown). et al., 2012) were ran in both qPCR and PCR. ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱǰȱȱȱȱȱ ȱǭȱȱǻǰȱȱȱ ambiguous result samples, in a 25 μl reaction ȱǰȱ¢ȱȱǰȱǰȱ as previously described (Snow et al., 2004) gen- www.dnaseq.co.uk) using the second round erating a 636 bp product using primer sets as nested PCR primers. The sequences were ana- ȱȱȱŘǯȱȱęȱȱȱ ¢ȱȱȱřǯŖȱ ȱǻ ȱ ȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱ Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and ERB1 (Barta et al., 1997) and reverse primer BLASTn searches in GenBank. Np1045r (Steinum et al., 2ŖŖŞǼȱ ȱȱ- ȱȱȱŚŝȱǚǯȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱ the nested PCR used primers and conditions ȱP. perurans and the apparent prevalence, as described by Young et al.ȱǻŘŖŖŞǼǯȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱęȱ- round PCR products were visualised by gel ȱȱȱȱȱȱęȱȱ ȱȱęȱȱ ȱ ȱȱǰȱ ȱǯȱęȱ ȱęȱȱǻǼǯȱ intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regres- 222, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 35(6) 2015 sion as Wald-type intervals on the log-odds ity (R) representing guanine or adenine, which scale using Taylor linearised standard errors ȱ¢ȱȱȱǰȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱǯȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ Calculations were carried out within the R sta- the salmon louse. The horse mackerel isolate tistical environment 3.1.2 (R Core Team, 2014) ȱ ȱşşǯŞƖȱ¢ǰȱǻȱȱ utilising the supplementary R package survey ěǼȱȱP. perurans (EU326494.1) isolated 3.30-3 (Lumley, 2004). ȱȱȱȱȱ ¢ȱǻ¢ȱȱ ǯǰȱŘŖŖŞǼǰȱ ȱȱȱȱěȱ ȱȱȱŘǰřŚŞȱęȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱěȱȱȮȱŚřŞȱȱȱȱ ǻȱȱȱŗǼȱ ȱȱȱP. perurans ȱǯȱȱȱ ȱĴȱ ¢ȱǯȱȱȱǰȱȱȱȱ- generic P. perurans ȱǻ şŞşŞŞŗǼǰȱşşǯŜƖȱ erel Trachurus trachurus,ȱȱȱȱP. ¢ȱǻŘȱȱěǼȱ ȱǰȱ perurans. ¢ȱ¡ȱȱȱȱ ȱȱěȱȱȱŚŚşȱȱȱ qPCR results where only one replicate tested previously discussed and a second nucleotide ǰȱ ȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ěȱȱȱŚŚŖȱȱȱȱȱ P. perurans ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱ isolate. At both positions there were ambiguity reported as negative. All other samples were in the culture isolate so again, this may not be ȱȱP. perurans by qPCR. These results ȱȱěǯȱȱȱ¡ȱȱȱ are summarised in Table 1. All negative controls ȱȱ ȱȱęǰȱ- had acceptable results. All endogenous controls cating that there was no contamination, and the ȱȱȱȱȱȱŘŖǯ ȱȱ ȱęȱ¢ȱȱȱ can be assumed that this is a true positive result. A partial sequence (495 nts, GenBank acces- ȱȱ şŞşŞŞŖǼȱȱȱŗŞȱȱȱP. ȱȱȱP. perurans positive sampled peruransȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ęȱ ȱŖǯŖŚřƖȱ ȱȱşśƖȱ ȱȱŖǯŖŖŜȮŖǯŘşřƖǯȱ ȱǯȱȱȱęȱP. ȱȱȱȱȱȱŖǯŖśŖƖȱ perurans and the sequence was most similar ǻŖǯŖŖŝȬŖǯřŜŚƖǼDzȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ to P. peruransȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱę¢ȱȱȱ wrasse ȱ ¢ǯȱę¢ǰȱȱȱ ȱ assay or gill sampling technique but does rep- ŗŖŖƖȱȱȱ ŗŝşśŘŖǯŗȱǻǼȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱşşǯŞƖȱ¢ȱǻȱȱěǼȱ ȱǯ to KF146711.1, KF146712.1, KF146713.1 (Karls- bakk et al., 2013). The horse mackerel isolate A previous study (Douglas-Helders et al., 2002) ȱ ȱşşǯŞƖȱ¢ȱǻȱȱ ȱȱ ȱęȱȱȱȱęȱ ěǼȱȱP. perurans (GU574794.1) isolated ȱȱP. peruransȱȱȱřŘśȱ ȱȱȱǰȱLepeophtheirus salmonis, on ȱęȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ Atlantic salmon in USA (Nowak et al., 2010). ǯȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱěȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱŚŚşȱȱȱȱ Ĵȱ ȱȱP. perurans was unlikely to mackerel partial sequence, a nucleotide ambigu- ȱȱȱȱȱȱ£ȱȱřŘśǯ Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 35(6) 2015, 223 ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ- as high as 20 °C in other countries (Munday et ȱȱ ȱǰȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ al., 1990). It has been reported that salinity is ¢ȱȱȱ¢ǰȱȱ a more relevant contributing environmental ȱęȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ¡ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱ- ȱȬęȱȱǯȱȱȱ ȱǃřŘȱȱǻ¢ȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŗǼǯȱȱȱ current samples were screened using molecular ěȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱ techniques and tissue integrity is not critical, the Scotland with outbreaks typically occurring ęȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ¡- ȱȱȱ ǰȱȱȱȱȱ sure to external environment might increase the (Marine Scotland Science unpublished data), ȱȱP. perurans detection. However, ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ such an assumption is not valid as intake and ȱǰȱȱȱȱȱP. per- ¡ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ urans might be expected. other gill arches and regions within those gills being more disposed to capturing and retaining There were two horse mackerel sampled in amoebae. Adams and Nowak (2001) analysed this survey - it is curious that the one positive ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱ ǯȱ¢ȱȱę¢ȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱęȱ in the dorsal section compared to median and ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ventral sections and suggested that this might ȱȱęȱȱȱP. perurans.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus (VHSV): on the Search for Determinants Important for Virulence in Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus Mykiss
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 08, 2017 Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss Olesen, Niels Jørgen; Skall, H. F.; Kurita, J.; Mori, K.; Ito, T. Published in: 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Olesen, N. J., Skall, H. F., Kurita, J., Mori, K., & Ito, T. (2015). Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss. In 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish: Abstract book (pp. 147-147). [O-139] Las Palmas: European Association of Fish Pathologists. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. DISCLAIMER: The organizer takes no responsibility for any of the content stated in the abstracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Organisms (WGPDMO)
    ICES WGPDMO REPORT 2018 AQUACULTURE STEERING GROUP ICES CM 2018/ASG:01 REF. ACOM, SCICOM Report of the Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Organisms (WGPDMO) 13-17 February 2018 Riga, Latvia International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2018. Report of the Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Or- ganisms (WGPDMO), 13-17 February 2018, Riga, Latvia. ICES CM 2018/ASG:01. 42 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8134 The material in this report may be reused using the recommended citation. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, images, graphs, etc. of which it has own- ership. For other third-party material cited in this report, you must contact the origi- nal copyright holder for permission. For citation of datasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on the ICES website. All extracts must be acknowledged. For other reproduction requests please contact the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2018 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGPDMO REPORT 2018 | i Contents Executive summary ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Proteomic Profiling of Newly Acquired, Virulent And
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Comparative proteomic profling of newly acquired, virulent and attenuated Neoparamoeba perurans proteins associated with amoebic gill disease Kerrie Ní Dhufaigh1*, Eugene Dillon2, Natasha Botwright3, Anita Talbot1, Ian O’Connor1, Eugene MacCarthy1 & Orla Slattery4 The causative agent of amoebic gill disease, Neoparamoeba perurans is reported to lose virulence during prolonged in vitro maintenance. In this study, the impact of prolonged culture on N. perurans virulence and its proteome was investigated. Two isolates, attenuated and virulent, had their virulence assessed in an experimental trial using Atlantic salmon smolts and their bacterial community composition was evaluated by 16S rRNA Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Soluble proteins were isolated from three isolates: a newly acquired, virulent and attenuated N. perurans culture. Proteins were analysed using two-dimensional electrophoresis coupled with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The challenge trial using naïve smolts confrmed a loss in virulence in the attenuated N. perurans culture. A greater diversity of bacterial communities was found in the microbiome of the virulent isolate in contrast to a reduction in microbial community richness in the attenuated microbiome. A collated proteome database of N. perurans, Amoebozoa and four bacterial genera resulted in 24 proteins diferentially expressed between the three cultures. The present LC–MS/ MS results indicate protein synthesis, oxidative stress and immunomodulation are upregulated in a newly acquired N. perurans culture and future studies may exploit these protein identifcations for therapeutic purposes in infected farmed fsh. Neoparamoeba perurans is an ectoparasitic protozoan responsible for the hyperplastic gill infection of marine cultured fnfsh referred to as amoebic gill disease (AGD)1.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report: an Overview of Emerging Diseases in the Salmonid
    TECHNICAL REPORT An overview of emerging diseases in the salmonid farming industry Disclaimer: This report is provided for information purposes only. Readers/users should consult with qualified veterinary professionals/ fish health specialists to review, assess and adopt practices that are appropriate in their own operations, practices and location. Cover Photo: Ole Bendik Dale. 32 Foreword Dear reader, as well as internationally by rapidly spreading through trans- Although we are still early in any domestication process, boundary trade and other activities. salmon is a relatively easy species to hold and grow in tanks and cages. Intense research to develop breeding programs, In this report we highlight and discuss six important diseases feed formulae and techniques, and technology to handle large or health challenges affecting farmed salmon. We have animal populations efficiently and cost-effectively, are all parts identified them as emerging as there is new knowledge on of making Atlantic salmon farming likely the most industrialized agent dynamics, they re-occur or they are well described in one of all aquaculture productions today. Consequently, salmon region and may well become a threat to other regions with the farming is an important primary sector of the economy in same type of production. producing countries; according to Kontali Analyse¹, global production of Atlantic salmon exceeded 2.3 million tons in 2017 Knowledge sharing on salmonid production, fish health and and today salmon is a highly asked-for seafood commodity emerging diseases has become a key prime awareness with worldwide. dedicated resource and focus from the farming industry through groups such as the Global Salmon Initiative (GSI).
    [Show full text]
  • Disease of Aquatic Organisms 73:43
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 73: 43–47, 2006 Published November 21 Dis Aquat Org Concentration effects of Winogradskyella sp. on the incidence and severity of amoebic gill disease Sridevi Embar-Gopinath*, Philip Crosbie, Barbara F. Nowak School of Aquaculture and Aquafin CRC, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1370, Launceston, Tasmania 7250, Australia ABSTRACT: To study the concentration effects of the bacterium Winogradskyella sp. on amoebic gill disease (AGD), Atlantic salmon Salmo salar were pre-exposed to 2 different doses (108 or 1010 cells l–1) of Winogradskyella sp. before being challenged with Neoparamoeba spp. Exposure of fish to Winogradskyella sp. caused a significant increase in the percentage of AGD-affected filaments com- pared with controls challenged with Neoparamoeba only; however, these percentages did not increase significantly with an increase in bacterial concentration. The results show that the presence of Winogradskyella sp. on salmonid gills can increase the severity of AGD. KEY WORDS: Neoparamoeba · Winogradskyella · Amoebic gill disease · AGD · Gill bacteria · Bacteria dose · Salmon disease Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION Winogradskyella is a recently established genus within the family Flavobacteriaceae, and currently Amoebic gill disease (AGD) in Atlantic salmon contains 4 recognised members: W. thalassicola, W. Salmo salar L. is one of the significant problems faced epiphytica and W. eximia isolated from algal frond sur- by the south-eastern aquaculture industries in Tasma- faces in the Sea of Japan (Nedashkovskaya et al. 2005), nia. The causative agent of AGD is Neoparamoeba and W. poriferorum isolated from the surface of a spp. (reviewed by Munday et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Report: 19Th Annual Workshop of the National Reference Laboratories for Fish Diseases
    Report: 19th Annual Workshop of the National Reference Laboratories for Fish Diseases Copenhagen, Denmark May 27th-28th 2015 FISH positive staining for Rickettsia like Gill necrosis in Koi Carp SVCV CPE on EPC cell culture organism in sea bass brain Organised by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Fish Diseases National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark 1 Contents INTRODUCTION AND SHORT SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................4 PROGRAM .................................................................................................................................................................8 Welcome ................................................................................................................................................................ 12 SESSION I: .............................................................................................................................................................. 13 UPDATE ON IMPORTANT FISH DISEASES IN EUROPE AND THEIR CONTROL ......................................................... 13 OVERVIEW OF THE DISEASE SITUATION AND SURVEILLANCE IN EUROPE IN 2014 .......................................... 14 UPDATE ON FISH DISEASE SITUATION IN NORWAY .......................................................................................... 17 UPDATE ON FISH DISEASE SITUATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN BASIN .......................................................... 18 PAST
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Temperature on Amoebic Gill Disease Development: Does It Play A
    1 Effects of temperature on amoebic gill disease 2 development: does it play a role? 3 Ottavia Benedicenti *a,b, Tom G. Pottinger c, Catherine Collins b,d, 4 Christopher J. Secombes *a 5 6 a Scottish Fish Immunology Research Centre, Institute of Biological and Environmental 7 Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, UK 8 b Marine Scotland Science Marine Laboratory, 375 Victoria Rd, Aberdeen AB11 9DB, UK 9 c Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, 10 Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK 11 d Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), Unité Mixte de Recherche UMR Biologie 12 des Organismes et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques (BOREA), 7 rue Cuvier 75231 Paris Cedex 05 13 14 *Corresponding authors: 15 Ottavia Benedicenti 16 Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal, 17 Instituto Nacional De Investigaciones Agrarias, 18 Carretera Algete-El Casar de Talamanca, Km. 8,1, 19 28130 Valdeolmos, Madrid, Spain 20 E-mail: [email protected] 21 Tel: +34 916202300 22 23 Chris Secombes 24 Scottish Fish Immunology Research Centre, 25 Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, 26 University of Aberdeen, 27 Tillydrone Avenue, 28 Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, UK 29 E-mail: [email protected] 30 1 31 Acknowledgements 32 This work was supported by a PhD studentship from the Marine Collaboration Research 33 Forum (MarCRF), which is a collaboration between the University of Aberdeen and Marine 34 Scotland Science (MSS), Marine Laboratory, UK, and by Scottish Government project grant 35 AQ0080. Thanks go to Dr. Una McCarthy for invaluable advice regarding the in vivo 36 experiment, to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • In Common Carp: a Pilot Study
    pathogens Article Natural Feed Additives Modulate Immunity and Mitigate Infection with Sphaerospora molnari (Myxozoa: Cnidaria) in Common Carp: A Pilot Study Vyara O. Ganeva 1, Tomáš Korytáˇr 1,2, Hana Pecková 1, Charles McGurk 3, Julia Mullins 3, Carlos Yanes-Roca 2, David Gela 2, Pavel Lepiˇc 2, Tomáš Policar 2 and Astrid S. Holzer 1,* 1 Biology Center of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology, 37005 Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice, Czech Republic; [email protected] (V.O.G.); [email protected] (T.K.); [email protected] (H.P.) 2 South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia, 37005 Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice,Czech Republic; [email protected] (C.Y.-R.); [email protected] (D.G.); [email protected] (P.L.); [email protected] (T.P.) 3 Skretting Aquaculture Research Centre, 4016 Stavanger, Norway; [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (J.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-38777-5452 Received: 26 October 2020; Accepted: 28 November 2020; Published: 2 December 2020 Abstract: Myxozoans are a diverse group of cnidarian parasites, including important pathogens in different aquaculture species, without effective legalized treatments for fish destined for human consumption. We tested the effect of natural feed additives on immune parameters of common carp and in the course of a controlled laboratory infection with the myxozoan Sphaerospora molnari. Carp were fed a base diet enriched with 0.5% curcumin or 0.12% of a multi-strain yeast fraction, before intraperitoneal injection with blood stages of S.
    [Show full text]
  • (Salmo Salar) with Amoebic Gill Disease (AGD) Chlo
    The diversity and pathogenicity of amoebae on the gills of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) with amoebic gill disease (AGD) Chloe Jessica English BMarSt (Hons I) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 i Abstract Amoebic gill disease (AGD) is an ectoparasitic condition affecting many teleost fish globally, and it is one of the main health issues impacting farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar in Tasmania’s expanding aquaculture industry. To date, Neoparamoeba perurans is considered the only aetiological agent of AGD, based on laboratory trials that confirmed its pathogenicity, and its frequent presence on the gills of farmed Atlantic salmon with branchitis. However, the development of gill disease in salmonid aquaculture is complex and multifactorial and is not always closely associated with the presence and abundance of N. perurans. Moreover, multiple other amoeba species colonise the gills and their role in AGD is unknown. In this study we profiled the Amoebozoa community on the gills of AGD-affected and healthy farmed Atlantic salmon and performed in vivo challenge trials to investigate the possible role these accompanying amoebae play alongside N. perurans in AGD onset and severity. Significantly, it was shown that despite N. perurans being the primary aetiological agent, it is possible AGD has a multi-amoeba aetiology. Specifically, the diversity of amoebae colonising the gills of AGD-affected farmed Atlantic salmon was documented by culturing the gill community in vitro, then identifying amoebae using a combination of morphological and sequence-based taxonomic methods. In addition to N. perurans, 11 other Amoebozoa were isolated from the gills, and were classified within the genera Neoparamoeba, Paramoeba, Vexillifera, Pseudoparamoeba, Vannella and Nolandella.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology of Amoebic Gill Disease
    Epidemiology of amoebic gill disease By Greetje Marianne Douglas-Helders B.Sc., M.Sc. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania, November 2002 Declaration This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgments is made in the text of the thesis. Marianne Douglas-Helders Authority of Access This thesis n-lay be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 Marianne Douglas-Helders Abstract Amoebic gill disease (AGD) is the main disease affecting the salmon industry in Australia, however inadequate information is available on the epidemiology of amoebic gill disease (AGD) and the biology of the pathogen, Neoparamoeba pemaquidensis (Page, 1987). Thus far no convenient mass screening test was available. In this project a pathogen specific and non-lethal dot blot test was developed and validated against indirect fluorescence antibody testing (IFAT), the 'gold standard'. The agreement between the 300 paired gill mucus samples that were analysed using both tests was high, with a corrected kappa value of 0.88. The overall aim of this project was to investigate distributions and seasonal patterns of the pathogen, identify risk factors for the disease and reservoirs of N. pemaquidensis, and develop and review husbandry methods in order to reduce AGD prevalence.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Bacteria in Amoebic Gill Disease
    Role of bacteria in amoebic gill disease by Sridevi Embar-Gopinath B.Sc., M.Sc., M.Phil. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Aquaculture, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia December, 2006 Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university and, to the best of my knowledge contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously published or written by any other person, except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. Sridevi Embar-Gopinath Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Sridevi Embar-Gopinath i Abstract Neoparamoeba spp., are the causative agent of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in marine farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar and AGD is the major problem faced by the salmonid industry in Tasmania. The only effective treatment to control AGD is freshwater bathing; however, complete removal of the parasite is not achieved and under favourable conditions AGD can reoccur within 10 days. Previous research on AGD suggests that gill bacteria might be one of the factors influencing colonisation of Neoparamoeba spp. onto Atlantic salmon gills. Therefore, the aim of this project was to investigate the role of salmonid gill bacteria in AGD. To obtain good understanding of the bacterial populations present on Atlantic salmon gills, bacteria samples were collected twice during this study. Initially, bacteria were cultured from AGD-affected and unaffected fish both from laboratory and farm.
    [Show full text]
  • FISH DISEASES LACKING TREATMENT Gap Analysis Outcome FINAL (December 2017)
    FISH DISEASES LACKING TREATMENT Gap Analysis Outcome FINAL (December 2017) FishMed + Coalition Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE) DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.09606 Contents Gap Analysis Outcome .................................................................................................................. 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ................................................................................................................. 2 Background: ................................................................................................................................. 4 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 4 Gap Analysis survey ...................................................................................................................... 4 Similar gap analyses ............................................................................................................................ 4 Laboratory hit list ......................................................................................................................... 5 Literature research ....................................................................................................................... 5 Aquaculture in Europe (data from FEAP Annual Report 2015)............................................ 6 Results .................................................................................................................................. 6 Salmon................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]